All Episodes
Previous Next
March 4, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:48
March 4, 2016, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 247 podcast.
Okay, so let me ask you a question.
Are all the fact checkers gonna get involved here and start checking penis size and hand and finger size, folks?
Is that where we're headed next?
Is that what's gonna happen here?
Washington post fact checker, politic fact.
And how are we supposed to trust what they tell us after this fact check on that kind of live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida?
It's open line Friday.
Are you kidding me?
Oh man, greetings, my friends, and welcome.
It's great to have you here, Rush Lindball behind the golden EIB microphone.
Yes, sir, we 80082882, the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
So they found a knife on the property of the demolished OJ Simpson estate.
Let me see if I understand this.
A construction worker finds a knife on the grounds of OJ's house when they're in the process of demolishing the house back in 1998.
He then takes the knife after looking at it for a while and gives it to an off duty traffic cop, the LAPD, who then takes it home and frames it for years.
And then all of a sudden, for reasons unbeknownst to us, he just, you know what, I better turn this over.
He turns the knife over to the LAPD.
They now are starting to examine whether the knife's got anything to do with the crime, O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown Simpson, Ronald Goldman, and so forth.
And everybody's how in the hell can this happen?
How can it happen?
Have you not been aware there's an OJ Simpson murder TV show on right now on some cable network?
What do you mean, how can this happen?
LAPD has a press conference coming up pretty soon here to announce whatever they've found about the knife.
Uh the the the idea that things are real in the American media today is still stunning to me.
There's no question what's going on here in my mind.
They're trying to hype this what networks, this uh this uh it's called American Crime Story, the O.J. Simpson, I think it's FX.
Hey, I don't blame them if they can pull a stunt like this off.
But the LAPD's got a press conference coming up.
Also, let me see if I understand something else here.
The same drive-by media that has been calling for the candidates to take the gloves off against Donald Trump are now all aghast and a gog, having fainting spells because the gloves have come off against Donald Trump.
The same drive by media that played Rubio's joke about Trump's small hands on a practically a nearly endless loop are now pretending to be all aghast and shocked and stunned that Trump would say he doesn't have small hands, and by the way, he doesn't have a small anything else, and it's nothing to worry about, folks.
Trust me, you don't have to worry about it.
It's all there.
And the media is having vapors.
The media can't believe what's happened here when they're the ones that stoked this kind of thing.
I mean, this the same infotainment media's done everything it can.
Let me just put it out there.
Everybody is aware that cultural standards are rotting away.
And there hasn't been anybody standing up.
Not in the drive-by media, drive by media doesn't stand up.
In fact, if you happen to point out cultural standards are rotting away in public decorum, they laugh at you and call you a nerd.
They call you an old fuddy duddy, they call you a stiff shirt, they call you a Victorian trying to get in the way of people's fun.
Now here they are, acting all offended and upset that this could possibly happen to our political discourse.
You ever heard of Bill Clinton for crying out loud?
The same drive-by media that wanted to pass that off as nothing.
The same drive-by media wanted to look at Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky and a cigar and everything else as none of anybody's business because it's just sex, and it didn't get in the way of him doing his job, now acting all distressed and wringing their hands and say, Oh my god, what's happening to our country?
Yeah, well, many of us have been asking that question for many, many moons.
You know, I I don't go into these debates with any expectations anymore.
That's the key to being able to handle all this.
If you if you go into these debates expecting your candidate to be treated fairly, you're going to be disappointed.
Whoever your candidate is, if you go into these debates expecting fairness, however you define it, you're going to be disappointed.
I have, I just watch them.
I watch them and soak it all up as a sponge.
I literally I try to shelve every expectation I've got and every hope that I have, whatever they are, uh, and whoever I happen to be pulling for, broom that too, and just watch it.
Just take it in as it happened and judge it accordingly.
And the here's my takeaway from last night.
We'll, of course, fill in blanks and get into this in great detail.
So...
But I think Ted Cruz won that debate last night hands down.
I don't think it's even close.
I think Ted Clue, Ted Cruz was in a different league last night.
Ted Cruz was in a different debate than what everybody else was doing, including Kasich.
I think Ted Cruz was running rings around everybody in terms of awareness of the issues, knowledge of the issues, mastering whatever it was that was discussed.
Megan Kelly tried a couple of times to insult him in questions and take him off balance and didn't work either time.
He did not respond to her in a negative way.
He just took her question, answered it, and blew it out of the park.
The one question where she said, so looks like in this instance, we just can't trust Ted and his answer, specified how her question was misleading and had incorrect data in it.
I think it was a polling question on seeing in poll Trump and uh 49% uh and and Cruz pointed out in that poll that he's the only one beating Trump, or beating Hillary, rather, in that poll.
This is not to say that if you like Trump, if you like Rubio, if you like Kasich, then I thought those guys didn't do well.
I'm just telling you, as I watched this thing with with no expectations and with no hopes and with no preconceived ideas of what was going to happen.
I just thought last night, within the context of what happened last night, nothing compared to what's happened on previous occasions.
No baseline from previous debates or appearances from which I'm making comparisons, just within the confines of that debate last night, when Ted Cruz got the question about Detroit Flint, Michigan.
He's the only guy that got the answer right.
Now, the things other people said about it were true, but Ted Cruz is the only guy that got anywhere close to explaining what's wrong with Detroit.
Liberalism, left-wing policies, 50 years, everything that's going wrong wherever you go in the country.
People that have been running left-wing Democrat Party, wherever they've been in charge, unchecked, everything's a mess, just like it is in Detroit.
I think Cruz's skills as a debater were on full display last night for anybody to see.
But there was a period of time early on in the debate, in the debate where he was the new Ben Carson, meaning he didn't speak or wasn't heard from for easily a half hour.
His sections, his portions of the debate would nobody would call them the most entertaining.
The most entertaining portions, obviously, were between uh Rubio and Trump.
And Trump is entertaining and captivating and dominating whenever he is participating, no matter what he says, and no matter how he says it.
But I really, for the for the first time, I actually I don't know how else to explain this other than to think I in terms of the old way that we used to consider qualifications for the presidency.
The old way in which we used to analyze competence.
Ted Cruz hit a grand slam home run last night.
But that's not how we make judgments on these things today.
That's not a complaint.
It's just an observation.
I'm not whining.
I do not whine.
So that's my overview.
Of course, there are intricate elements and details of this thing last night to discuss.
We'll do that while mixing your phone calls in with the with the program today.
Plenty of audio sound bites to review from the debate last night as well.
One of the, I guess, one of the items of focus last night, based on just my perusal of drive-by media coverage, is some people think that Trump flip-flopped in a major way on immigration on the H1B visa questions and discussion.
There are other people who are expressing incredulity that Trump seemed to not know what off the record means.
Based on his answer about it, the off-the-record questions came up regarding Trump and his interview off the record with the New York Times editorial board.
And everybody's dying to know what he said.
And because he won't tell anybody what he said, and he won't release the tapes, and they asked him, the moderators and a number of people challenged him to release the tapes.
Tell us what you said there, Mr. Trump.
And Trump said, well, I have too much respect for off the record.
I have just too much respect.
I wouldn't do it to the other guys.
I would hope they wouldn't do it to me.
And I admit I was scratching my head on it because off the record is a protection for the candidate in this case, or the subject of a news story is totally in control of off the record.
If Trump wants to release it, he can.
If the New York Times does, they are violating a profound journalistic principle.
If they release it, which I think they've already done.
I think the New York Times even alluding to this to BuzzFeed and getting this whole thing going is a giant violation of journalistic ethics.
But Trump himself is in total control.
He's the one that would demand off the record.
The media doesn't offer it to you.
And if they do, you've got to be very suspicious about it.
Very rarely will the media offer you off the record.
Now, maybe for an editorial board meeting, maybe it's standard operating procedure to be off the record and everybody knows it going in.
But normally whoever is the subject, whoever's the interviewee has to request off the record, and then the media either agrees to do it or not, in which case the interviewee then decides how much he or she wants to say.
And if the media will not go along with a request to go off the record, you shut up, has been my experience.
The only way you go forward is if they if they uh grant you your request to go off the record.
But it's a it's a it's it's not something that anybody but the interviewee is in control of.
So uh it's it's not that the New York Times and Trump have to come to an agreement, it's totally up to Trump.
It's like grand jury testimony.
Grand jury testimony is secret, private, off the record.
But if the subject wants to go out and talk about it, the subject can.
But the prosecutors can't, and the grand jurors can't.
Whoever else is in the room can't.
But if you want to, if you're being, if you're the witness, you want to go in and talk about what have you can.
Very, very few do, but because when you get quote before a grand jury, it's generally pretty serious, as is this you know, this interesting that Hillary Clinton's uh this this guy that set up her server has been granted immunity.
And when I first heard that, that's not gonna mean anything.
This guy has no knowledge of anything other than how the thing was set up.
But then I learned he's been granted immunity, which told me, well, that means there must be a Grand jury.
And if there's a grand jury, that means somebody's presenting evidence of what Mrs. Clinton did, and this guy is being granted immunity as a means of facilitating the investigation into what Mrs. Clinton did or what Mrs. Clinton asked this guy to do.
So the existence of a grand jury in this case.
Um that makes it it it changes the focus of that particular story in a powerful way.
Take a brief time out.
We'll start with the audio sound bites here as Mr. Snerdley screens callers and gets us ready to go for open line Friday.
Remember, you don't have to talk about the debate if you don't want to.
Whatever it is.
You can talk about something that happened on the program yesterday if you want.
Day before it has nothing to do with politics.
That's what Open Line Friday is for.
OJ.
You got a call on OJ.
No, no, no.
We're still no OJ none of the time.
No, no, no, no, no, OJ.
I mean, that no.
I don't even want to talk about the FX series on the OJ story.
I mean, it.
No, no, no, no.
Our operative philosophy back then was no OJ, none of that trial happened while this program was on the air every day.
I never wanted something to end faster than that thing.
And I never had any doubt what was going to happen.
I've never thought one time they were going to find him guilty.
So as far as I was concerned, get it done and know the outcome here, let's move on.
So it was no OJ none of the time here on the EIB network, and that's still the operating philosophy.
Snerdley, if you had, if you had to just use one word to describe the debate last night, could you come up with that?
I know I'm putting you on the spot here.
I'll give you mine.
I'll give you my my word to describe the debate last night, troubling, and I'm still troubled by it.
I was troubled by that debate last night, and I still am, and I'm still trying to nail drilled down exactly why.
You know, there's a it it's right now it's a, and it was last night too, a I don't know what the feeling of unease.
I mean, I laughed at the parts that everybody laughed at, and I I watched this, but but it's something about it.
I and I don't know that it was just one thing about it, but uh I didn't I didn't finish that debate relishing coming here to talk about it today.
Anyway, we're gonna start with the audio sound bites, and before we get to the debate sound bites, I want to share with you this from John Heilman and Mark Halpern on their program with all due respect on the Bloomberg TV network.
They were talking about Romney and his speech yesterday in um in Utah, and it's timing.
And here's what they said.
The uh uh Heileman and Halpern have this, they're both talking about it, and this is the upshot of it.
Laid it all out of the table, every possible argument against Trump.
Will it have an effect on the race?
I doubt it.
And I doubt it mainly because of the fact that the Republican establishment, which Romney and McCain embody is in such disrepute with the Republican electorate now that it's not clear to me that it'll change very much.
We've seen Rush Limbaugh and Fox analysts rally to Trump's side.
Obviously, he's not what Romney had in mind.
That was Mark Halperon.
And just to repeat what he said there, seeing Rush Limbaugh and Fox analysts rally to Trump's side, obviously not what Romney had in mind.
Um, let's go back to just a little bit over 24 hours.
And it did he started at 11:30.
Romney did.
He finished 20 minutes later, which was 10 to 15 minutes before this program beginning.
And Snerdley said, you know, they chose this.
Snurdley's always snurdley is is constantly thinking everything goes on out there is timed around me.
You know, I don't think that way, but Snerdley does.
He's very loyal.
He said, you know, they timed this thing to start and finish right for your show started, which means this message was intended for you.
They're trying to get you to come out against Trump, and they're trying to make it easy on you to come out against Trump by quoting somebody else, i.e.
Romney.
And so I thought about that.
Well, if if if if you have a certain mindset, I can see how somebody might think that.
And let's say that it was.
Let's say that what Romney, among the many other things he was hoping to do, was to provide a way for people in the media to quote him in criticizing Trump rather than having to say it themselves, because the establishment might think that there are a bunch of conservative media types who really would like to launch into Trump, but who are afraid to do so.
So if I, Romney go out there and really unload, they can quote me and imply they support what I said, and that's the way we can get this done.
Now I of course had not considered that till Snerdley put that entire thought process in my mind.
But there are many flaws in that.
As we discussed yesterday, the the the entire the entire event raised more questions than it than it answered.
But I'll deal with that aspect of this, uh Snerdley's theory on this when we come back, and we will keep going, folks.
Hang in there be tough much more straight ahead.
We are back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh, open line Friday.
By the way, there is a second sound bite between Heileman and uh and and Halper.
Let's let's play these back to back.
Uh Greg, uh I should have done this at first.
They're on different pages.
Soundbites three and four.
They're actually just they're they're they're they're one bite here for the purposes of what I want to say.
So here's Heileman and Halpern again on their program at Bloomberg last night.
Laid it all out of the table.
Every possible argument against Trump.
Will it have an effect on the race?
I doubt it.
And I doubt it mainly because of the fact that the Republican establishment, which Romney and McCain embody is in such disrepute with the Republican electorate now that it's not clear to me that it'll change very much.
Obviously he's not what Romney had in mind.
There's an element, I think of the tactical here.
I mean, there's no way Romney could make the argument he was making, doing this unprecedented thing of being the past nominee attacking the current most likely nominee without demonstrating that he has partisan bona fides that part of what he's thinking about here is that Hillary Clinton is the ultimate foe.
If he didn't say that, he would have been attacking more than he already was by many on the right, like Rush Limbaugh.
All right, so uh as you can see, I remain a fixture in the minds of Heileman and Helper, and I'm honored to be there.
It isn't a problem.
But back to the original premise that and I by the way, before just so there's misunderstand no misunderstanding, I do not subscribe to this.
I'm just telling you, it's an interesting thing that was mentioned to me to bounce off of.
Romney goes out and does this thing from 11.30 Eastern time to 11.50, 10 to 15 minutes before the program.
By the way, I need to preface this by pointing something out that I know.
I know that within the confines of the Republican Party, the RNC, the elected Republican uh class, if you will, in Washington, there is mounds and mounds and mounds of frustration.
That conservative media is not only not criticizing or attacking Trump, but in some cases openly supporting him.
And they don't understand it, and they're pulling their hair out, trying to figure it out.
And they are trying to figure out ways that they can turn some in the conservative media against Trump.
And I think whoever put this idea in my head, who uh um it might have been Snerdley that the whole purpose here for Romney, not the whole purpose, but one of the one of the objectives, send Romney out there, use Romney's voice to rip into Trump, theoretically making it easier for conservative media to agree with Romney and thus criticize Trump that way without having to do it themselves.
And now they're sitting there all a Twitter and puzzled because it didn't work.
Because there wasn't any such use of Romney's words to join in criticism of Trump.
And it's it goes back to to what I said immediately after Romney's statement yesterday.
The divide, the disconnect between what we call the Republican establishment and and it's not just people supporting Trump, people supporting Cruz, people supporting Rubio, Even people supporting Ben Carson.
The disconnect between the people elected Republican class and their voters is larger.
It's wider.
It's a wider gulf than I've ever imagined it could be.
It's wider than I thought it was just last week.
And Romney's remarks illustrate how they just don't get it.
If they think they have this denial that there's this mountain of criticism for Trump just waiting to be unleashed, or that the Trump campaign's going to implode, or that Trump's going to quit.
I mean, they're still harboring uh fantasies like that.
But what became clear to me, both with Romney's remarks and what, well, actually some things that people said prior to, but not just prior after.
What really has the Republicans scared is what happened with Trump.
Well, the whole thing has him scared.
Don't misunderstand.
But but the thing that set him off, the thing that really started ringing the alarm bells and forced Romney and whoever else was behind this to send him out there was this business of Trump on Jake Tap on CNN not disavowing the KKK and David Duke.
Because the Republican Party, I have I have now decided, I've can I've figured it, I have suspected it.
The reason they don't criticize Obama, the reasons are many, they don't want to be called racists.
They want to be seen as cooperating, they want to be seen as bipartisan, but it really is the race.
It's really real they are paranoid.
They are paranoid that the entire American population sees them as racists.
And when Trump, who is now leading the primaries, didn't disavow on that one show, didn't disavow Duke or the KKK, even though he's disavowed them a thousand gazillion times before and after, because he didn't on that one show, that gave them their opening, that scared the death out of them.
That's what's animating them about this.
And gang, it's time to get over that.
You're taking this defensiveness about this to the point of paralysis.
And nobody ever got anywhere, being on defense the entire time, worried about what somebody thinks about you, and then when something happens that supposedly confirms it, going into action to try to disprove it.
And Romney even harped on this in his in his remarks about about Trump.
But the problem is nobody thinks Trump's a racist.
Nobody thinks Trump is a bigot.
Nobody thinks that Trump supports the KKK.
It's absurd.
And yet the Republican establishment sitting there thinking that it's possible.
And since he's the standard bearer now, since he's leading in the primary, they're worried that this is going to be amplified and that more and more Americans are going to see the Republican Party as a bunch of racists.
It's the most ridiculous thing.
Because Trump's supporters do not see him that way at all.
Trump is attracting African Americans.
He's attracting Democrats.
He's attracting Hispanics.
What he says about broadening the Republican base is actually happening.
So this fear they have over this being called racist, well, that really bugs them, but all of the other allegations against them explains a lot.
They are totally paralyzed by Obama's race.
They will not say one syllable in opposition to Obama.
We now know for a fact without a doubt now that the reason they have not made a single move towards stopping Obama is simply because of race.
There may be other reasons, but that's the overriding, that's the umbrella under which everything else is happening here.
They haven't figured out how to refute this charge for the last 60 years that they're a bunch of racists and so forth.
They think everybody believes it.
Trump comes along, has that slip up on Jake Tapper's show, even though there's thousands of disavowals before and after, even though nobody thinks that Trump, I mean, the drive by's are not even the drive-by's are not trying to prove Trump's a racist.
They're trying to prove Trump's other things with this continually harping on why didn't you conclusively say what we know you believe?
What was the reason you wanted to back off on Tamper show?
It it's not to prove that Trump's a race.
Nobody's even making that charge, but they in the Republican establishment are sitting there thinking that's all anybody's seeing.
Ergo Romney's got to go out there and disavow Trump.
Romney's got to go out there and disavow Trump on that basis because we can't afford for this, they're saying their minds for this to continue to be seen.
And it's time to get past that because that's phony baloney, plastic banana, good time rock and roller stuff anyway.
That's not that it's not serious, but the way they're dealing with this is not the way to change people's perception about it.
And it's easy for me to sit here and say, I mean, I'm not in their business, I don't go get votes, I don't run the party, I'm not in charge of their messaging or any of that, but it's it it it's it's easy to see that they're not dealing with it in the in the right way.
And then the bit about throwing in criticisms of Hillary in order to try to that that's not what we were asking.
What we were asking is why now?
And why go out and do that if you're not gonna endorse somebody else at the same time?
Why go out and savage Trump and not endorse somebody else?
Why not get in yourself if it's this dire?
If if we can't have this guy as our standard bearer, if that's unacceptable.
Why aren't you getting in yourself?
Why aren't you endorsing somebody else?
Where was the where was this to save Jeb?
Way back when.
Those are legitimate questions to ask about this.
And also to raise questions about the real motive behind it.
But it further illustrates something else.
They still have no idea why Trump is Trump.
They have no idea why Trump is attracting a crowd.
They have no idea why Trump's crowd is loyal to him.
Despite being told every day, despite the evidence, right in front of them every day.
And it isn't complicated.
You don't need focus groups with dials monitoring the response in debates to understand this.
You don't need to hire a bunch of consultants to try to explain it to you.
It's simple as pie.
It's right out in front of their face.
And it is no more complicated than people that vote Republican simply do not think the Republican Party is going to do one thing to stop and change the direction this country is in and on, which is toward its transformation and destruction.
It is such a serious thing to the people who worry about this and care about it.
They don't.
If somebody landed here from Mars that had three eyes and openly stated they hated Orson Wells, but promised to stop what's happening to destroy this country, they would be supported.
The people who make this country work are the ones who have not benefited at all from any supposed economic growth in the last 30 years, 40 years.
It really's so easy to see that there must be some purposeful desire to ignore it, to pretend it's not real, or even worse, to beat it back.
The people who desperately want this fixed are patriots.
They love their country, and they feel like they're in opposition with people that run the party they have supported all these years, are actively trying to sabotage the fix.
It isn't hard to understand, and you're not gonna go out there and talk people out of this with the usual personal political insults that you make because you you can't make them with any credibility.
By that I mean the Republican establishment.
Anyway, I've got to take a break here, folks.
Hang on, we'll get to your phone calls.
People want to weigh in, I'm sure.
Hang in there.
Well, I just received a couple of new soundbites from Mitt Romney, so we'll play them.
And Trump has announced that he's pulling out of CPAC.
He was scheduled to speak at CPAC on Saturday.
Yes, my friends, I was invited.
I was I was invited to wrap it up again this year, and I uh I couldn't, I couldn't make it.
But Trump has pulled out on Saturday.
Instead, he is going to be campaigning in Kansas and Florida.
That's that's what the Trump campaign says.
Here's Romney on Cavuto Coast to Coast, the Fox Bidness Network this afternoon.
Uh Cavuto says, you know, I was struck by the fact that uh you don't want Donald Trump to be the nominee.
You said that everyone should support the candidates that are out there, Kasich and Ohio, Rubio, Florida, and uh and Cruz anywhere else, where besides Ohio and Florida because Kasich and Rubio in the ballot there.
Uh it sounds like you're almost wishing for a brokered convention, Governor Romney.
I'd like to see an open convention where there's more give and take between the candidates and someone else besides Donald Trump becomes the dominant in a convention.
Let's say uh Donald Trump had 40% of the delegates, and the other guys have 30% each, and uh, what does that give us?
All right, that's a hundred percent.
All right.
So in a case like that, you'd say that's 60 percent that don't want Donald Trump, and totally appropriate for them.
Let's say they get together, form a ticket.
That's how politics works.
All right, listen, put it on the table.
What he's talking about is a fusion ticket between Rubio and Cruz.
Unless he wants to throw his own hat in this ring at some point.
Which which, you know, don't rule that out.
Don't don't rule that out.
Um Romney thinks he understands what he did wrong in the last campaign.
And among the things that he thinks that he did wrong, he misjudged the polling data in the final three weeks of the race.
He trusted it.
The polling data that showed he was leading by six.
And you remember that polling data was everywhere.
It wasn't just one poll.
And yet Dick Morris all over TV explaining why the polls were right.
And uh Romney, he didn't say this, but he he uh you you can infer that that Romney thinks it caused him to go into a pre-vent defense mode.
Uh, you know, back off, don't do anything to blow the lead, don't say anything is gonna upset anybody, when in fact the polls were not right.
And there's just four to five million people that didn't show up.
So it's uh some people think he wants a do-over.
Uh Cavuto said, Well, would you vote for Hillary if you don't get what you want at the Republican convention and your nominee, somebody you can support.
Would you vote for Hillary Clinton?
No, I'm not gonna vote for Hillary Clinton.
I'll either vote for a conservative who runs, or I'll write in a name of a conservative.
I cannot in good conscience vote for a person who has been as degrading and disruptive and unhinged.
Well, okay, but all that happens when you talk that way, you just glue Trump's supporters to him tighter.
You go out, you've you've got these people.
If you I he I guess this is the point of view you wish people that were supporting Trump weren't, right?
And so you go make a speech and you try to sound the alarm bells, try to wake them up.
Hey, uh here's who this guy really is.
You go out and do it.
It that never works.
You can't talk people out of an emotional bond they have with something.
You you can't talk people out of.
You got a Budweiser fan.
You can't talk him out of it.
So that doesn't work.
So the next day, you come.
I can't, in good conscience, vote for a person's been degrading, disruptive, and unhinged.
Well, you're you're now calling his supporters disruptive, degrading, and unhinged by association.
You're just cementing the relationship even tighter.
This is really it's why I say, folks, the the disconnect here from the establishment down to the grassroots rank and file.
They still don't understand how and why this has happened.
And there I speaking for myself, there's nothing more I can do to explain it.
I probably have devoted a grand total over the weeks of five hours to explaining this in every which way possible.
As have others.
And it's apparently it isn't registering in any way with them.
It is Open Line Friday on the most listened-to radio talk show in the country, hosted by me, your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh.
We have an obscene profit break here at the top of the hour.
Debate, sound bites are coming up, as well as reaction from you.
What you thought about it last night.
I'm holding back, pending hearing from you.
▲
Export Selection