All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 23, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:31
February 23, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, I'm telling you, I think that I think the Chelsea video is a hoax.
It's just, it was too cliched.
It fits every stereotype too perfectly.
Young girl, millennial, in politics, trying to make a difference, trying to help people, trying to be, you know, like really uh involved.
And she making phone calls for Bernie.
Because we love Bernie.
Well, it's actually them.
And then out of the blue, she ends up talking to Trump voters.
She's working a Bernie Sanders phone back, and we all know that's get out the vote.
That's not calling people to argue with them or change their mind.
It's just get out the vote.
And she's talking to ends up talking to Trump people who are so mean.
And you made me cry.
You're gonna be Mexicans and animals and these white people.
I don't even know what it means to be white anymore.
Starts crying about that.
And then these people, these people, they still think they won the civil war.
It's like talking to less than a brick wall.
It's way just about it.
When I heard like talking to people who still won the civil war, she's not old enough to know what the civil war is, and there's no question she'd probably not been accurately taught about the Civil War anyway.
Um so I think I think the whole thing, it was just it's too pat.
It's gone viral too fast.
And I think it's it's designed.
A typical Democrat trick to uh portray in this words of this innocent young flower of a Sanders supporter.
Not yet pollinated.
How mean and this out there.
And then there's this, folks.
You see the report in the Hill.com over the weekend of Bernie supporter.
A Bernie Sanders supporter was investigated by the Secret Service for trying to post an obituary in the newspaper for Hillary.
That's right.
February 20th, the Hill.com Clinton obituary notice prompt Secret Service Report.
A man who appears to be a Bernie Sanders supporter has been uh reported to the Secret Service after trying to leave an obituary notice for Hillary Clinton in a Nevada newspaper.
The man who identified himself as Don Schubert filed the obit Friday with the Las Vegas Review Journal.
The newspaper reported the notice listed Clinton's date of death as Saturday, the day of the Nevada Democrat caucuses.
He was asked to leave the building with later reported to the Secret Service by the newspaper, the review journal.
And get this, it turns out that the guy who did this hosts Bernie Sanders phone banks.
Just like our young flower, Chelsea hosts Bernie Sanders phone banks.
The official Sanders campaign website also lists Don Schubert's house in Long Beach, California as a volunteer phone bank site.
So here's this guy running a Bernie phone bank.
And actually post an obituary for Hillary Clinton.
You gotta, you gotta love it.
But I'm just saying, it looks like some dirty tricks are coming out of the Sanders camp, folks.
And the dirty tricks are aimed at Hillary and uh and also at Trump.
Well, and the Republicans, the um conservatives in general.
And if I'm wrong, if if if her video is genuine and if everything she says happened, happened, and she was minding her own business calling Bernie supporters, and some of them started shouting at her about Mexicans and the Civil War and reduced her to tears, then well, we're very, very sorry for that.
It's very, very sad.
Really very sad that that happened.
I'm sorry she had such a rude awakening to the political system in America.
I know it's not what they learned in kindergarten.
And it's got to be.
Oh, yeah, this she these people were worth the animal.
They were worth And I don't know what it means to be white anymore.
What does that mean?
I don't know what it means to be white.
That's not something a Bernie supporter would say.
And if you if somebody's running around talking like that, it's going to be from an entirely different demographic group.
Anyway, I just wanted to be on record as thinking to me it sounds like a hoax.
I can be wrong, but it sounds just too pat.
Greetings and welcome back.
It's a delight to have you here, 800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
I have to tell you, I was I was kind of blown away watching Obama today.
He was on time for the most part.
He was scheduled to show up at 1030 and make comments regarding the closing, finally, of Club Giftmo, where we have a thriving licensed merchandise business by the merchandise business.
One of the first things Obama did to refresh your your memories.
I mean, it was the first week that he was in office.
He's up there reading all these executive orders and making announcements about their intentions.
And he's got some guy there named Greg Craig, who was a Washington lawyer who had been involved in sending Elian Gonzalez back home to the communists from Florida.
And Obama's going through these things he's going to do and his executive orders, and he had to stop in the middle of it and say, What are we doing here, Greg?
What's going on here, Greg?
And Greg gets kind of embarrassed because he wrote it for Obama to say, and Obama didn't quite understand it.
But they ended up talking about they're going to close Gitmo.
They're going to close Guantanamo Bay.
It's where we're keeping the terrorists and it's rotten.
It's horrible.
It's where waterboarding went on.
It's it's a it's a it's a recruitment uh plus for the for the terrorists for that we have this prison there, and he's been promising to close for seven years.
So he goes out there today to announce that he's going to close it.
And I I really I was I was stunned watching this.
For one thing, the issue as far as Obama goes is seven years old now.
There hasn't been any sense of urgency about this in seven years.
Not like this today.
And yet there he was portraying this, closing the prison at Gitmo as one of the most pressing, urgent, important, we can't delay any longer things that we face today.
He went on about how hard he has been working for seven years to close this.
He said that our allies call him every day, demanding answers, wanting to know when we are gonna close Gitmo.
Because Giftmo, according to Obama and our allies, is the number one terrorist recruitment tool in the world.
Which of course cannot possibly be true.
Well, okay, I'll be glad to demonstrate that.
What is Guantanamo Bay?
It's a prison in Cuba.
Who's there?
Battlefield captured terrorists.
Right now there are 107 of them, seven of them there.
All these allies, Obama says, all of our allies are calling in every day, demanding to know what we're gonna do, when we're gonna close it.
None of them want any of the prisoners, however, Obama said that.
So what are we gonna do with them?
What do you think we're gonna do?
We're gonna transfer them here, folks.
We're gonna we're not letting them out of prison.
We're changing the prison.
We're gonna move them from Guantanamo to supermax facilities in the United States.
Now, if Guantanamo is the number one terrorist recruitment tool in the world, guess what's gonna happen?
Our supermax prisons are going to become the number one terrorist recruitment because they're still gonna be in prison.
This is it was insulting to my intelligence, but it was absurd to boot because we know what what the number one terrorist recruitment tool is Islamic supremacy.
Islamic superiority, Islamic ideology.
The imams, the mosques, that's where the recruitment am.
Are you kidding me that Guantanamo Bay, the number one terrorist recruitment tool in the world?
That's no different than Obama saying the United States defending itself and protecting itself is the number one terrorist recruitment tool in the world.
So essentially Obama just insults the United States again and basically claims that our very existence is putting us at risk because our very existence is angering young Islamic men and inspiring them to jihad.
When anybody with half a brain knows that's not the case, what's inspiring them to Islamic jihad is their mothers, their fathers, the imams, the mosques, and Islamic supremacy as it is taught.
To be consistent, if Guantanamo Bay was making the United States an even bigger target, we would release them.
No matter whether another country would accept them or not, we would release them.
And then we would not be as big a target, right?
Because then we would be nice people, and we would be understanding, and we would no longer be holding Islamic terrorists prisoners.
But we're not going to release them.
We're just going to move them.
So we're really to believe here that a facility, a brick and mortar facility, maybe a couple of palm trees, but you get the drift.
In Cuba, is what is really putting us at risk from further terrorist attacks.
I thought it was Apple.
But it was iPhones.
Now we're finding out it's Club Gitmo.
Okay, so we're going to move them to American prisons here in America, continental United States.
Where Obama says, though worry they'll never get out.
We're going to put them in these supermaxs and never been an escape.
Ain't gonna happen.
That's not where we're worried about.
There hasn't been an escape from Gitmo either.
That's not the thing.
The attempted escape becomes the problem.
What have if happens if you have a terror cell that decides it wants to attack one of these supermax prisons under the premise of trying to get one of these or two of these prisoners out?
It's still increasing the risk for people that work at our prisons and people who live near them in any other number of ways.
This move doesn't make any sense.
That close gitmo under under these premises, it's ridiculous.
That a brick and mortar facility with some palm trees and a beach happens to be the number one terror recruitment.
That that's that telegraph to the world what a bunch of rotten mean people America has.
And so in order to eliminate and get rid of that threat, we're going to move them to American prisons.
Where they're supposed to then go, okay, we're not happy now.
You have closed Guantanamo Bay and put them at Superman action colorado.
We love you now.
Is that how this works?
It's crazy.
But that's what Obama said he's going to do.
Once again, if you strip it all away, what Obama said was that it's the very existence of the U.S., our laws, and our enforcement of our laws that really ticks them off out there.
Really angers them and makes us a bigger target.
If we just stopped enforcing our laws, if we just stopped imprisoning captured terrorists, why they would respect us more, they would love us more and maybe attack us less.
Here, listen to yourself, Obama.
Two soundbites here from this morning at the White House number one.
When it becomes clear that something is not working as intended, when it does not advance our security, we have to change course.
For many years it's been clear that the Wait a second, wait, Q that back up.
What evidence is there that these prisoners being in prison is not enhancing or advancing our security?
It most certainly Is the people in the prison are not free to go out and conduct attacks.
I'm so glad this is about over, but this just reminds me of how what what absolute horror these last seven years have been dealing with this kind of I don't care what the issue is.
Like if it's health care, I don't know if we care about what whatever this guy was that we get this kind of nonsense, BS, lies that insulting insult everybody's intelligence.
Mr. Trump, you really want a guy that's not telling the truth about things.
Focus on this guy.
This guy, this guy is leading the pack.
This guy Nick Clinton's.
They're making pikers out of anybody else you happen to think is lying out there.
Okay, play this thing again from the top.
When it becomes clear that something is not working as intended, when it does not advance our security, what we have to change course.
For many years, it's been clear that the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay does not advance our national security.
How so?
It undermines it.
How?
Keeping this facility open is contrary to our values.
Whoa, come on!
It undermines our standing in the world.
It is viewed as a stain on our broader record of upholding the highest standards of rule of law.
What an absolute crock.
That's the biggest, most gigantic filled croc I have encountered from this guy in a long time.
He's essentially saying for many years it's been clear that the prison does not advance our national security.
Our prison undermines it.
Keeping the prison open is contrary to our values.
What freaking values is he now besmirching?
This is the constant go-to for Obama.
It's not reflecting our values.
I don't think his values are mine, folks, not too many of them.
But clearly.
Keeping Islamic terrorists in prison undermines our standing in the world.
Do you notice it's always about that?
It goes back to 2008, the Iraq war, Obama's campaign making the world love us again.
And now it's been open for seven years under his auspices.
Once again, the limbaughorem on display.
Obama acting like somebody else has kept it open.
Somebody else is making this country at great risk.
Somebody else is denying our values.
Somebody else is making us look really bad around the world.
He's gonna come in, save the day, and close the place down, even though for seven years with all of these reasons hanging over, he said, every day he couldn't be bothered to close it.
But now that he's leaving, and he even said, you know, Biden and I are leaving, so we don't even have to be political about it anymore.
We can we can do the right thing.
Well, that's a tandem out admission that the reason he didn't shut it down is because of politics.
Get this, get this next bite.
We have time here for it.
I've been working for seven years now to get this thing close.
Right.
That's enough.
Stop the tape and go to a break.
I've been working for seven years to get this thing, as though somebody's been up there stopping him.
So somebody, these dark forces, powerful forcement standing in his way.
He's president of the United States for crying.
It's the same reaction I have when I listen to Hillary or Bernie talk about the economy or health care.
Who the hell's been in charge for crying out loud?
All right, look at me.
I'm gonna tell you what this really all about.
What Obama wants, before he can move these people, they have to have a trial.
And by the way, all these calls that he's getting from our allies asking about Gitma, what they're really asking is will we take their refugees?
That's what they're really asking.
They want to get rid of their rabble.
They're asking if we'll take them at Club Gitmo.
They're not asking Obama when he's gonna shut it down so America's values are restored.
What a crock.
What this is about is giving many of these incarcerated terrorist bad guys trials.
as though they are citizens.
Obama knows plenty of radical left-wing lawyers that cannot wait to defend these guys, Paid for by the United States government.
You remember how Obama and Eric Holder they wanted to bring uh Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to New York for a trial?
And there was such an outrage.
He still wants that.
Now you might be saying, what is it what does he want to put him on trail for?
Well, I folks.
Um people may not yet have learned this, or may not yet have gotten to point where they can't accept it.
But Obama disagrees profoundly with everything we did in Iraq from the war on terror.
He disagrees with everything about it.
He doesn't like that we are at war with Islam, and he wants these terrorists to be able to testify to what rotten treatment they got.
He wants these people in American courts shouting their grievances of the United States to the world.
He wants trials for many of these people before he moved them to American prisons.
And the reason he wants trials is he wants to give them a voice.
And in the process of conducting their defense.
They bring witnesses, they testify maybe themselves to their mistreatment, to how horrible the United States has been in their native countries to their families, for their friends, or whatever.
Brace yourselves, because that's what that's the desire here.
This is about making the United States face in front of the world.
The the horror and the terror it has brought to otherwise innocent and harmless people around the world.
Make no mistake that that is part and parcel of what is desired here.
Back in a moment.
Now don't misunderstand.
Obama can't close Gitmo on his own.
And that's what this thing was all about today.
The dark forces standing in Obama's way of closing Club Gitmo has been a bipartisan Congress which has voted time after time in bipartisan majorities to not fund to not pay for moving these terrorists.
So once again, Obama wants to go out and use illegal executive orders to bypass as much as he can with public pressure.
And that's why all this malarkey about it's not true to our values, it's putting us at greater risk.
It's just condescendingly insulting.
Here's here's the second Obama soundbite, by the way.
Here it is, number 30.
You know, three, two, one, he.
In order to affect the appropriate disposition of individuals currently detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo.
Uh and promptly to close the detention facility at Guantanamo, consistent with the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice.
I hereby order.
And we then provide uh the process whereby Guantanamo will be closed no later than one year from now.
We will be uh is there a separate uh executive order, Greg with respect to how we're gonna dispose of the Hold it.
That that that 30 is the second Obama bite, talking about well, no, 29's the first Obama bite, and 30 is the second Obama bite.
31 is that what you just played.
That's the numbers I've got.
That was Obama telling Greg Craig and the I'm trying to follow what is this?
Okay, let me explain this.
Here's here's the here's the set the bite that I wanted says this.
Obama, I've been working for seven years now to get this thing closed.
As president, I've spent countless hours dealing with this.
I do not exaggerate about that.
Our closest allies raise it with me continually, and that's the bit about him calling him raising it and making him think that uh he wants us to think that they want it closed.
When if if they're calling him, it's because they want us to accept their refugees at Gitmo.
They don't want it closed.
They want to send us their dregs and everything else.
Obama's trying to twist it around and say, oh no, no, uh, we're uh they want us close uh Club Gitmo and it's making everybody look better.
Now, when he says he spent seven years trying to close it, uh these dark forces, these it's Congress.
Bipartisan Democrats and Republicans have refused to pay for it.
They do not want these prisoners here.
And they do not want them to have trials.
There are some Democrats who don't want any part of this, but Obama does.
He wants them brought here so they can have trials.
He wants to put them in supermax prisons here, which still has them in prison, which still is not our values, which still makes the prison a target for potential attacks trying to effect an escape.
I mean, I what's the difference if they're in prison here or there?
It seems like we're safer if they're in prison in Cuba.
Closest thing we'll ever have to Alcatraz here.
This is all so damn convoluted.
I'm telling you what this is.
He wants these trials.
He wanted the Khalid Sheikh Muhammad trial.
He wanted it public, he wants it on television.
He wants these people telling the world how rotten they've been treated by the United States, how unfairly they've been treated.
They want these, he wants these people to recount all of the horrors they have experienced at the hands of the U.S. military.
And who knows whatever else.
Because I'm here to tell you that Obama resents the heck out of the entire war on terror and its premise.
He won't even identify it.
He will not even say Islamic terror.
You can't even say terrorism.
You can't say jihad, none of this stuff.
Now, I do just since I mentioned this, grab what on my sheets number 31 is the soundbite you just played.
This is 19 or 2009, January 22nd, 2009.
I mean the day after Obama's been immaculated here, and where he first brings up the whole notion of closing Club Gitmo, and he's got this famed Washington lawyer, Greg Craig with him there, and in the Oval Off.
And Obama has signed the executive order calling for the closure of Guantanamo Bay within one year.
In order to effect the appropriate disposition of individuals currently detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo, uh, and promptly to close the detention facility at Guantanamo consistent with the National Security and Foreign Policy Interests of the United States and the interests of justice, I hereby order.
And we then provide uh the process whereby Guantanamo will be closed uh no later than one year from now.
We will be uh is there a separate uh executive order, Greg, with respect to how we're gonna dispose of the detainees?
Is that uh we will be setting up a process uh whereby this is gonna be taking place.
So here's here's our young boy wonder president here announcing he's gonna close Club Gitmo.
No thought has been given to what the hell we're gonna do with him.
So in the middle of announcing his executive order, he has to turn to the guy who actually wrote it, Greg Craig, who's the guy who got Elian Gonzalez out of that little house in Florida and sent back down to the communists in Cuba, is uh Greg uh uh is a separate uh separate order here for what we're gonna do with the uh disposed of the teenies, what we're gonna say, and says we're gonna set up a process.
Oh, oh, yeah, right, right, yeah.
We'll be we'll be setting up process uh whereby this is gonna be taken.
So he just ran out there, and the first thing he wanted to do was satisfy these radical left-wing lunatics that had elected him, who thought that his election was all about closing Guantanamo because of silly notion about our values or what have you.
Um it looked like he'd not even seen these.
It looked like the his these had been pre-written for him, and he was sent out there to read them.
Uh, what are we doing next?
Uh Greg, what are we doing?
Anyway, to the phones we go, this is uh this is Alina in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Yes, good mor good afternoon.
Yes.
Um, I have a question.
What is that?
So this morning, Obama gives his little speech, and then in March, he's gonna go visit Cuba.
Right.
Is it possible that he's going to just hand over the naval base over to Cuba, and can he do so unilaterally without Congress approval?
No.
No, he can't do it.
Well, he's done anything.
with this guy, look.
There has to be caveats, I know.
The law says that he cannot randomly, discriminately, not only hand bases over to people he can't close them on his own.
We have a separate base closure commission of former government officials who, since they can't, they're not in office, they can't the flack they get won't affect them.
Our current elected officials don't want their fingerprints on anything like that.
So we set a blue ribbon panels to close bases.
And we've been doing that for well, at least 15 years.
But no, he can't just hand it over to Castro.
Castro's, by the way, it's a good question you're asking because Castro just despises the fact that we have a presence there.
Just despises that there is still a naval basic one tonable bay.
Now your real question is if he w if he could, would he?
And you can probably answer that yourself, Lena.
She can if he could, he would.
If he could, he would.
He would have done it already.
Uh yeah.
Well, he doesn't want to go over there empty-handed.
That's why I thought about this.
Well, he's he doesn't need to give them Guantanamo in order to no.
He's already given them the gift of he's is he's just propped up this communist regime when they were about to implode.
He just propped them up.
He's given them life.
Yeah.
He's not he's not going to Cuba empty-handed, and he's not gonna come back empty-handed either.
Anyway, I'm not gonna be begrudging him going to Cuba.
I'd like to go to Cuba.
But no, I'd be I'm too famous.
I I I couldn't I I I can't do those kinds of things.
You mean they don't know me there?
You have no idea.
In your dreams, they don't know me there.
They most assuredly do know me in Cuba.
They've got they've got a couple of five-star hotels in Havana.
Well, international five that look, they do have a couple of really for Cuba, ten star, yeah, uh worldwide.
They've they've got a couple from I don't I've we're reporting what I've been told.
Uh by people who have been there.
It's not very many.
I mean, most people still walking around with their hands out hoping that the Castros will give them a rice cooker.
Now the general population over there is still.
A day trip to Cuba?
Well, yeah, but but I can't get in there and get out.
No, no, we we Americans still do not have blanket freedom.
You still have to get certain kind of visas to get in there.
Not not much has really changed yet on that.
There have to be specific reasons where you get a journalist visa, they wouldn't give me one.
I don't think.
I wouldn't want to go on a journalist piece anyway, but uh there's it it's a little bit easier to get there, but it's not just if you want to go go.
Although I did read recently a bunch of airlines are expanding the number of flights from the United States to Cuba, it's gonna be an incredible number of what is it, daily or weekly flights whenever they get it up and running.
But I mean I when I say I'm too famous, I couldn't I couldn't go there and and not be noticed and followed around and inspected, you know, documented, and with news reported back what I did.
I just couldn't do it.
I'm too famous for this.
And is Don't think they don't know you in Cuba.
If you only knew, folks, if you only knew By the way, I just want to reiterate again, because I kind of threw this out there and mentioned in passing.
Do you see where the FBI, the Department of Justice is said, oh by the way, after we get into this terrorist phone, after Apple lets us in that we have twelve other phones here that we uh we need help getting into.
And they're not related to terrorism.
Other crimes, not related to terrorism, not terrorist possessed phones.
There's twelve other phones that oh, by the way, uh we want Apple to get us in these twelve, too.
It's not going to stop.
Um let's see.
Uh one other thing.
Uh just just to uh from the New York Times on November 15th last year, 2015, no just a few months ago.
The latest defense bill out of the House even explicitly forbids the closing of Guantanamo Bay.
As recently as November that's what Obama's all fired up about.
So who knows what he's gonna do when he's down there.
Or even before.
Here's Pam in Brentwood, Tennessee.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush, how are you?
Fine, thank you.
I have been listening to you since I was in college and I'm 48 now.
And today was the first day I had to call in because I was ticked off.
Oh no.
I'm sorry, Rush, I was.
I just felt like you had an opportunity to share Marco Rubio's true true stance on immigration, and that one snippet from O'Reilly, and I realize you can't play it all, but you could have expanded upon it and shared exactly what he was saying.
Okay, okay, hang on, Pam, hang on.
I'm gonna find here, it's it may take me a half hour to find it, but I want to find the soundbite of and I'll play it for you, and I want you to say, Oh, look, I found it.
It's number thirty.
We've obviously got two number thirties here, so I don't know what number this is for you, but it's Rubio tells the base what it doesn't want to hear is what it's titled, and it's from uh Fox News last night.
So Mike, when you found that, let me Okay.
So Pam, I'm gonna play this, and then you and I will talk about it.
And if you're ticked off at me and you're not the only one, uh, for not telling the full story, you'll have your opportunity to do so.
Here, O'Reilly's question is of Rubio.
Your vision is to deal with illegal aliens here who have broken our laws.
How?
What will you try to sell the voters?
And here's what Senator Rubio said.
As far as the 12 million that are here, look, I I don't believe the American people support some sort of militaristic roundup of individuals, and I don't think you could carry it out.
The sort of tactics that would require would offend the American people.
And the good news is we don't have to do it that way.
If you secure our border, if you secure our border, if you put in place mandatory e-verify, if you put in place a mandatory entry-exit tracking system, if we prove to the American people that illegal immigration is finally under control, I think the American people will respond in a very rational, reasonable, but responsible way.
And that's the end of our bite.
And my comment was that I that I'm not sure that that's what Republican primary voters want to hear, because what it means is that once we get the border secure, we're not going to do anything about the 12 million here illegally except find a way to make them legal.
And and that's simply not his stance.
And I and I have to admire Marco Rubio for not exploiting the anger of the American people on this immigration situation.
I look at myself as a realistic conservative, and the people I talk to and my friends who are of different political viewpoints, all feel the same way.
And and and it is unrealistic for anyone to think that Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are going to deport 12 million people.
And so Marco Rubio went on and discussed his deverify, and again, it may be the uninformed electorate, but if you read what that means, it means you come out of the shadows.
You have to register.
If you don't, you're deported.
You also deport um criminal illegals.
And I don't get the fact that people aren't sharing this his stance on immigration.
And we know you know that.
Well, because you've just I'm now you're gonna really hate me.
I I you know you don't know it's not your problem, Pam, but I'm being beat up these past two weeks, like you can't imagine.
For every one of you, there's ten Cruise people calling, and there's fifteen Trump people calling, and then there's four Casic people calling.
I can't win.
This is what happens.
Well, if I endorsed one of them, it'd be even worse.
What you just described comes right out of the gang of eight bill.
The e-verify, I've had it explained to me by no less than Senator Schumer.
And uh that's my point here.
I'm I uh it's well my I guess I'm I guess I'm concerned that people listen to you and they cling to your words because you ninety-nine point whatever percent of the time are usually right.
Eight.
Eight, okay.
Eight percent of the time you're usually right.
And when you make it seem like it's a realistic option for Donald Trump, that's I'm just giving you my interpretation.
No, no, no.
You're no you're not you're not clinging on my words.
You're now interpreting them.
I'm just talking about what people are saying and how the base might respond to it.
Right, but I want you to hang on this no, this is important, and uh, I need you to hold on for a while.
If you can't, maybe you can give us your number.
We'll call you back when it's time to get back on the.
I've gotta go, I've gotta take a break here.
Mr. Snerdley will explain it to you, but I will expand on this in a moment.
It is the fastest three hours in media, my friends.
This, I mean, this is heavy breathing here in order to keep up.
So we got a chance here to catch our collective breath here at the top of the hour with an obscene profit timeout, perhaps.
Um local news, biased or unbiased, depending on your station.
Just kidding.
▲
Export Selection