All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:31
February 10, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, there's a picture of it right now.
If this doesn't say it all, Bernie Sanders sitting here at Sylvia's in Harlem with the Reverend Sharpton.
Seven years into the first administration of the African-American, first African-American president.
Bernie Sanders is sitting with Al Sharpton and they are whining and moaning about how it's all gone wrong for the black community in America.
And it has.
It has gotten worse under Obama.
I don't care where you go to look, where you go to unemployment, employment, teen unemployment, per capita income, whatever category you want to use, life in America has gotten demonstrably worse for practically everybody, and especially for African Americans.
And so here's Bernie Sanders, while we have the first African-American president ever who was elected to reverse this.
He was elected finally, finally, after all these years in slavery.
The United States of America and its government was going to focus on the victims of this country.
It was going to focus on the victims and the people who've been made to pay and build and do all this and have been ripped off and taken advantage of.
The Obama administration was finally going to get even with all those people who had mistreated minority groups left and right.
And every one of those minority groups, even if you want to include women in there because the feminists love to portray themselves as victims, they're all complaining.
It's all worse.
This is the Limbaugh theorem on display, bigger than it's ever been.
These guys are complaining about the status quo that they built.
They are complaining about the problems that they are the architects of.
It is mind-boggling to me how they get away with this.
On the one hand, we're told that Obama has been a brilliant president.
He has been great.
He has been historic.
Obama's the first president with national health care, the first president to do this, the first president to do, he's the smartest president.
We have all of these things.
And yet over here, the Democrat campaign, this country's in worst shape than it's ever been in.
And somehow, it's the fall of Wall Street.
Somehow, Obama failed to tame them.
He got even with everybody else, but somehow he has failed to get even with Wall Street.
Dirty little secret, Wall Street buys funds, props up the Democrat Party.
So here's Bernie sitting around having coffee with Al Sharpton, talking about what needs to be done for the African-American community.
Seven years of everything they believe in having been implemented with no opposition.
Well, no, I don't expect them to sit there and admit that they're the problem.
No, no, no, no, no.
I don't expect that.
But I am hopeful that the American people, that this is going to be tough.
I mean, you've got college graduates now coming out of school having apparently bought totally into socialism.
They think it's cool.
They think it's fair.
They think it's equality.
And, you know, in a way, look at it from their standpoint.
Where they go to school, college campuses.
For the most part, they're pretty nice places.
Other than the rape that they say happens there.
But you can avoid that.
The campuses are nice.
They're idyllic.
Classrooms are nice.
The professors.
Look at the professors.
The socialists teaching this stuff.
They look like they got pretty comfortable lives.
I mean, they've got jackets with little patches on the elbows, and some of them smoke pipes, but they've got nice offices and they've got nice homes, quarters, whatever you want to call them on the campus.
It looks really, really clubby and affluent.
What's not to like?
And then these graduates run around.
Look at Hillary Clinton, and here she is making $115 million over the years doing speeches, and she's a devout socialist.
Well, she doesn't admit it, but she is.
What's not to like?
I mean, if you look at it from their point of view, it's not hard to see how socialism has been sold, including as having an economic advantage and having an economic superiority.
They're not taught, obviously, about the failures of socialism.
The failures of this country and the problem areas are all blamed on big corporations, the usual Democrat Party enemies list, and Republicans and George Bush and the Iraq War and what have you.
So I know it's a long shot, but I'm going to keep harping on it.
It's just amazing to listen to Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders run around, whine, moan, complain about this country and what's going wrong these past seven years when they have got everything they want to one degree or another.
Here's Bernie, little soundbite, outside, actually he had left, I guess he was on the view talking about his meeting with Al Sharpton, the National Action Network.
And the co-host, Sonny Hoston, says, we've heard that you met with Al Sharpton this morning for breakfast at Sylvia's restaurant in Harlem.
I was a bunch of a breakfast.
I only had half a cup of coffee.
We have a lot of support within the African American community.
I think the reason we'll do well is our views on criminal justice in this country.
Most Americans, black, white, Latino, whoever, understand that it is not acceptable to see unarmed people being shot by police officers.
And let me just say this.
When youth unemployment in the African-American community, kids who are unemployed or underemployed for high school graduates, is 51%.
Don't tell me we do not need to invest heavily in the African-American community and create decent paying jobs.
There it is, right there in it.
51% in the African-American community.
It wasn't that when Obama took office.
51%.
And we have to do what?
We have to invest heavily in the African-American community and create decent paying jobs.
What have you been doing the past seven years?
Why has Obama allowed things to get so bad in the African-American community with Barack Obama in the White House and they run around talking about all of these innocent, unarmed African-Americans being shot by the cops like it happens every day?
Why?
How?
What's going to be any different with you in there, Bernie?
We've just had Obama, who is every bit the socialist you are, and he's a little smarter about it than you are.
Every bit the committed leftist, every bit the anti-police department president that you would be.
Why is all this happen even after Obama's DOJ takes over local police departments?
Why is it they continue to behave in manners you disapprove of?
And I thought, Obama, how many job summits have we had here with people like Thomas Lupi Friedman and New York Times participating in the first two, three years of the White House?
There were job seminars seemingly every month.
There's nothing the government can do to create jobs.
The government is destroying jobs.
The government is destroying the 40-hour work week.
The government is destroying every element of every institution that has defined this country's greatness.
And we're living amongst that destruction.
And Hillary and Bernie are running for office as though all this that has happened either hasn't happened or it's somebody else's fault.
Look at if seven years, going on eight now, of unopposed, unstoppable socialism, transformation, whatever you want to call them, if that doesn't even begin to show progress, then what is it that says we need seven more years of it?
These are the people who have made the problem, the problems.
These are the people, the architects.
They have created the problems.
It is socialism.
It is a gigantic and growing government comprved of all of its inefficiencies and lack of compassion, bloated bureaucracies that has led to all of this.
Anyway, one of Bernie Sanders' big complaints is all the money in politics.
We've got to get rid of Citizens United.
We've got to get rid of all the money.
You know, if you look at the people that won in New Hampshire, they probably are people who had the least money.
New Hampshire combined campaign and super PAC spending, New Hampshire.
Jeb Bush, 36 million.
Percentage of the vote, 11.1%.
Chris Christie, $18.5 million.
Percentage of the vote, 7.5%.
Marco Rubio, 15.2 million, 10.5% of the vote.
John Kasich, $12.1 million, 16% of the vote.
Donald Trump, 3.7 million, 35% of the vote.
Ted Cruz, $580,000.
Barely over one half of $1 million.
Cruz got 11.5%, 11.6%.
If big money were buying elections, then Jeb and Hillary would have won big last night, and it wouldn't have even been close.
And Bernie Sanders would not have even been an asterisk if big money was what really wins elections.
John Kasich spent $12 million to come in second.
Trump spends $8 million less and comes in first and more than doubles Kasich's support.
You want to talk about a waste of time and a waste of money.
And when you run these numbers and you boil it down to how much was spent per vote, it becomes even more illustrative of the absolute waste.
But where did the money go?
Where does this money really, really go?
The lion's share of all of this money goes to the drive-by media because the lion's share of this money is spent to buy advertising, television advertising, radio advertising, print advertising, and none of the pamphlets.
And you have to spend some money to hire people to run out there and knock on doors and make phone calls and so forth.
But it's in the drive-by media's interest that all of this money be spent.
And it's the drive-by media that keeps celebrating all the monies.
It's the drive-by media that keeps promoting the value of all the money in politics.
Yes, because they're the primary beneficiaries of all the money, above and beyond, maybe in some cases, even the candidates.
I'd say that the drive-by media has benefited much more from Jeb's money than Jeb did.
They love all these candidates still being in.
They love all this continue to go on.
They love this big money.
And they sit there.
The F. Chuck Todds and the rest of these drive-bys, they love to tell you how they think it's so pathetic.
It's so impure of this money in politics, and yet it's what's paying them all.
Ted Cruz spent the least amount per vote than all candidates in New Hampshire took third place.
Jeb Bush spent more than 30 times the amount of money in New Hampshire than Donald Trump did.
When you break it down, Jeb Bush spent $1,200 per vote in New Hampshire.
$1,200 and still was unable to finish in the top three.
Back after this.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Great to have you here.
800-282-2882 if you ought to be on the program already.
Wednesday, the fastest week in media, this is.
And we're going to go to Ron and Houston.
You're next, sir, and I'm really glad that you waited.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, Mega Guido from the Big Oil Capital of the World.
Quick question.
I really need your insight and your wisdom on this.
I'm a Trump supporter.
I've donated several times to his campaign.
I'm really excited about what he's done.
But as I meet with friends and the more and more we discuss the mess that Washington's in, the political incorrectness, everything that's going wrong, not only in this country, but in the world, I continue to wonder if maybe he's too nice to get done what needs to be done in Washington.
And what we're looking at in the global stage, I wonder if maybe as radical as it sounds, Trump might be the best alternative.
And the reason I say that, Rush, is because honestly.
Wait, wait.
Wait just a second.
I didn't hear.
Who did you say is too nice?
I think that Ted Cruz is too nice.
Ted Cruz is too nice.
Even though he talks tough, and we know that he's got the political will, he's got the conservative background.
He's a great debater.
I just don't think he's going to be able to do what needs to be done in Washington fast enough.
And the reason I say that is the world is so radically different today.
I wonder if even Ronald Reagan, with the same political expertise that he had, if he could make the radical changes after seven years of what Obama does to set our country and possibly the world back decades in time.
I need to ask you a question since you're eventually getting to where you're going to ask for my advice on this or whatever.
I need to ask you a question first.
Sure.
If Cruz is too nice to deal with the powerful forces that are currently shaping the world, and if Reagan might not even be, what is Trump going to do?
What are you convinced Trump is going to do to beat back these powerful forces?
Well, I think what Trump does is he've said it yourself, Rush, ever since he got into the campaign.
He doesn't need the media.
He doesn't need the establishment.
I mean, business in the world today and business in New York City is probably as tough an environment that you need to exist in.
And he has constantly succeeded.
Sure, he's used the rules in his favor, but he's not easily intimidated.
He's got the character.
He's got the political will.
He's got the finance.
Okay, look, hold it.
I don't, that's...
That's fine.
Let me ask it again, but telling you one thing first.
You don't think Ted Cruz is tough enough?
You will not find another senator in your memory who's ever gone to the floor of the Senate and accused his majority leader of being a liar to his face on national TV, Senate being covered by C-SPAN 2.
Ted Cruz has taken on personally, face to face, the people in the Senate where he is that he believes are not doing enough to stop Obama and are lying to him about the issues that they are asking him to support.
I don't know how you define guts or courage, but actually, Rush, I understand your point, and maybe I misspoke.
It's not that he's not tough enough.
I just believe that under the normal process that a standard traditional politician would work and would try to get things done in Washington is not what we need.
I think the level that this country has depressed to after seven years of Obama, I don't believe that there is just a traditional political exit from where we are.
So what do you what is how does that manifest?
If the traditional way that politics has happened in this country is not going to work anymore, what does that mean?
That Trump's going to go in there and do what he wants regardless what the House and Senate say about it, and he's just going to use the power of his personality to get it done.
And if they disagree with him, he's going to tell them to pound sand and do it anyway, because that's what we need right now.
What does all this mean to you as it manifests itself in real life?
That's what you're asking me to consider.
So I'm asking, how's he going to do all this?
Okay, well, exactly.
The very thing that so many people have criticized him for is that he said he's going to make deals.
He does make deals.
The Democrats, under the last seven years, they've gotten absolutely everything they want with no pushback from the Republicans.
I believe that he would be able to negotiate, giving the Democrats the same thing that all great negotiations in the world take place, so that both parties walk away from the table, saving faith, so they can go back to their supporters and say that they won.
So I think that he could give them, give the Democrats, give the Liberals substantial action.
He could give them gains in the game, but he would get what we need: close the border, stop illegal immigration, start creating jobs, start working towards making the U.S. great in the world in terms of having people respect us instead of treat us as if we're just another person sitting around the table at NATO.
I hear Trump say all that, and I see people cheering it, and it sounds great.
I just want to find out from you and others who support Trump on a day-to-day, but what do you see happening?
Do you see him building the wall?
Will the wall be built, do you believe?
Without a doubt, the wall will be built.
Will Mexico pay for the wall?
I believe what the average person probably understands is that Mexico will pay for it.
The question is: are we going to send them an invoice and they're going to reimburse us?
No.
But he will get it back in trade.
I believe that at the end of the day, just as he would on any of his business deals, he would be able to show you on the balance sheet that we have not paid for it, that someone else has.
Okay.
That's fine.
I don't want you to misunderstand the tone here.
All of this is me learning.
You're an avowed Trump supporter.
You're convinced that he's the only guy.
I'm just curious what you see day to day happening.
Thanks.
Right on, we're back.
Back we are, El Rushbo, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Folks, I want to remind you, we're not the beginning of the cycle again.
Before the Hawkeye cauckey, everything was theoretical.
All we had to go on was polling data.
And it led to all kinds of agendas and scenarios.
And the media has to report something 24-7 news cycles.
They've got to report something.
So they're naturally going to conflate polling data with reality, and the two are going to end up being confused.
Then by the time you throw everybody's agenda from guest to guest to guest, analyst to analyst to analyst, before anything has ever happened, you have a number of people already thinking they know what the outcome is.
But then we actually have the vote.
And everything that happened and was said prior to it is pretty much forgotten because an injection of hard-cold reality has taken place.
It happened after Iowa.
And you remember what happened after Iowa?
After Iowa, oh my God, Ted Cruz.
Oh, my God.
Oh, Ted Crow.
Geez, Ted Cruz.
Establishment went nuts, but then they were happy because Trump didn't win.
Oh, my God.
It may be true.
It may be true.
Maybe Trump is a myth.
Maybe Trump isn't real.
Oh, we're still alive.
We're still thinking, God, we've got a chance.
Reality changed everything.
Then the cycle started repeating because upcoming was New Hampshire.
So Iowa was forgotten.
What do the polls in New Hampshire say?
And another six, seven days of theoretical analysis coupled with agendas from analysts and guests and hosts and so forth started dominating a news cycle.
Once again, we had the conflation, the conflating or the combination of reality and theory to the point that people were prepared for what they thought they already knew was going to happen because of all the pre-New Hampshire primary coverage.
Then the New Hampshire primary comes and then another hard cold injection of reality.
We have the results.
And the establishment was so happy after Iowa.
Their boy just bottomed out.
Marco Rubio bottomed out in New Hampshire.
Trump outperforms the polling.
Oh, no.
Oh, no.
For the first time in the entire process, they said Trump's real.
Do not doubt me.
Even after Iowa, they were really hoping that this whole Trump thing was a myth.
See, what they were telling themselves was, if there's a real anti-establishment revolution going out there, if there's real populism and real nationalism going on out there, then Trump would have won 50% of the vote in Iowa.
But he didn't win.
He came in second place.
He was not happy.
He was not, everybody was upset.
Ted Cruz won the thing.
People started telling us, well, yeah, we knew that that was likely going to happen because of the evangelical vote.
They get all geared up.
They get all excited for the possibility that Trump is really not real.
It's just a myth.
Then New Hampshire happens.
Oh, no.
Now a dose of reality sets in, and every myth that they had created for themselves the last five or six days blown to smithereens.
And now we're starting it all over again this time with New Hampshire.
And what are we hearing about New Hampshire?
Well, in New Hampshire, it's all for both sides, by the way.
Bernie's toast.
One off New Hampshire.
It's a toast.
He's toast because there aren't any African Americans in New Hampshire.
It's Louis White in New Hampshire.
It's Lily White in Iowa.
You go to New Hampshire.
Ha, it's a much different.
That's where Hillary is going to get back in it and close Bernie out.
And it's South Carolina.
And it's over.
That's right.
South Carolina.
And on the Republican side, South Carolina now.
That's Kasich comes in second.
That was, of course, the second place finisher.
New Hampshire is often proclaimed the winner.
Establishment chosen guy Rubio didn't perform like they hoped.
So now they're lost.
Dude, Jeb didn't perform.
Nowhere to go.
Trump wins big.
Oh, no.
Trump's real.
Now we have five or six more days of theorizing as they try to tell themselves they still have a chance.
They try to tell themselves it's still not over.
They try to tell themselves that whatever they want to believe is true.
And on February 20th, we're going to have another hard dose of reality.
We're going to have another debate this Saturday on February 20th, South Carolina primary.
Hard dose of reality is going to settle it.
And this cycle, it's important not to get caught up in it.
What's really happened so far?
And I got to be very careful here.
I don't want to offend anybody.
But all that's happened here Is two small states have voted.
Two small states.
We're not even to 1% of the delegates yet.
And people are acting like it's over here, it's over there.
For some candidates, it obviously is, but they're not dropping out.
They're not dropping out.
That's only going to help Trump, by the way, at least as far as South Carolina goes.
But it is this endless cycle here of theorizing and pretend and fantasy land with an occasional hard, cold shower of reality that brings everybody back for a while.
But then the whole process starts repeating where everybody tells you what they know is going to happen in South Carolina and why it's going to happen in South Carolina.
And yet, in the two states so far, there have been shocks, despite what everybody thought they knew.
Bernie winning as big as he did was a shock.
And as far as the establishment's concerned, after Iowa, they really thought maybe it's all over state of Trump.
Maybe Trump's polling is nowhere near what his turnout's going to be.
Uh-uh, not the case.
Worse than they thought.
We here just sit back and watch this stuff and comment as it goes.
Let's go to the audio soundbites and let's look at some, listen to some of the reaction last night from varied interests.
We'll start with Britt Hume, Fox News, special coverage, New Hampshire primary, Brett Bayer speaking with the senior political analyst emeritus, Britt Hume, about Trump's primary victory.
Brett Baer says, Britt, what are your thoughts here, buddy?
The Federation of the Fed Up, it appears, has carried the day in the Republican Party.
The voters that were for Trump are people who consistently we've seen in polling in this exit polling tonight are people who have had it with the standard politicians.
Now, whether this will carry, how far this will carry forward into the upcoming states is anybody's guess, but that's where we are.
This establishes it as well as anything we've seen.
The Federation of the Fed Up.
That's you.
The Federation of the Fed Up appears has carried the day in the Republican Party.
The Federation of the Fed Up has just flipped the bird to the establishment.
They're not happy about it.
The voters that were for Trump are people consistently we've seen in polling are people who've had it with standard politicians.
Whether this will carry on, how far this will go on, anybody's guessed.
Britt, it's going to keep going on.
It's going to keep going on because the Republican Party people have lost faith in it.
They've lost faith in its purpose.
Its purpose, when in the minority, is to stop the Democrats.
Pure and simple.
And there hasn't been any of that in seven years.
That this is hard for people in Washington to figure out is quite telling to me because it's right, it's so obvious you can't miss this.
The motivation for supporting Trump, the motivation for supporting outsiders, the energy that comes with it.
How can you miss what this is about?
Maybe you don't miss it.
Maybe you just deny it and think that in time the Federation of the Fed Up will come to its senses.
Whereas the Federation of the Fed Up will tell you that after seven years, they have come to their senses and they have realized what's up with what.
And that's why they're doing what they're doing.
A couple of days ago, David Brooks, remember David Brooks, he's a conservative columnist of the New York Times.
His most recent column, he wrote of what great people Barack and Michelle Obama are.
The civility, the sophistication, the erudite nature of their character and personality.
And he demonstrated it this way.
He said, wouldn't you much rather have people like Barack and Michelle Obama go on the board of a charity in your community or your town than Ted Cruz?
Wouldn't it make you feel better about your town and your community if the charity apparatus in your town was chaired by Barack and Michelle Obama in their civility and sophistication, as opposed to Ted Cruz,
which is how he chose to demonstrate that he thinks Cruz is a neophyte, anti-intellectual barbarian, and the Obamas are the epitome of sophistication and culture and civility.
And what a damn shame.
So many people don't see it that way.
Well, David Brooks was on PBS special coverage of the New Hampshire primaries.
Judy Woodruff said, We heard Donald Trump say that he was going to be the greatest president that God has ever created.
David, there's no shortage of self-regard for Mr. Trump.
Is there?
He just has become a force of nature.
And the question for Donald Trump is: where's the ceiling?
A, can he make himself broadly acceptable to all parts of the party?
And B, is there an alternative?
Is anybody going to rise up and become the rival?
Will it ever be a one-on-one race, Trump versus someone else?
Right now, it looks like Cruz is the most likely of those possible alternatives among the mainstream conservatives.
Maybe there is no viable unifying force.
He's dejected, folks.
This is not making Mr. Brooks happy.
That there's no alternative to Trump and Cruz.
Why even be a conservative then?
Why even be a Republican?
If that's our alternative, oh my God, does that not signal the end of civilization as we know it?
And this muddled outcome, the fact that the field was not winnowed and parried down has caused the worst possible outcome for these people because they want somebody they can support to rise up and take on Trump.
That's what they're hoping and praying for.
Oh, it was going to be Jeb, and then it was going to be Rubio, and maybe it was going to be Christie.
And now, Kasich relieves.
Hey, try this.
This is the politico.
Just to fresh off the wire dispatch headline: Jeb plans scorched earth attack on Kasich and Rubio.
Jeb Bush already laying the groundwork for a brutal South Carolina campaign against establishment rivals John Kasich and Marco Rubio.
In an internal memo circulated late Tuesday, by the way, remember, the politico is where establishment Republicans go to leak news to the drive-bys.
The politico, that's where the establishment Republicans go to leak stuff.
So that's why this is probably true.
In an internal memo circulated late Tuesday, the Jeb campaign distributed talking points to top campaign aides and surrogates, highlighting lines of attack they plan to take against both candidates.
The memo suggests that Kasich does not have a realistic path to winning, and that's why the attack is going to take place.
They're going to tell people, don't waste your vote on Kasich.
He's hopeless.
You'll have a chance of winning.
Don't waste your time.
The real question is, then, why are you wasting your money on him?
But that's just me.
The attack on Rubio.
Senator Rubio has lost momentum, has been exposed as completely unprepared to be president, it says.
And then it adds that Rubio has demonstrated no respect for the nomination process and expects this to be a coronation.
That's what Jeb is going to say in the scorched earth campaign against Rubio.
Then the memo says Jeb also did well because he remains the only Republican candidate willing to take on Donald Trump and willing to stand up for conservative values.
Oh, they make this so hard somedays.
Internal memo claiming that Jeb's the only guy remaining the only guy willing to take on Trump, and yet the memo is how it scorched earth against Kasich and Rubio.
Now, I understand the strategery.
The strategery is, forget Trump, you got to get some people out of the way first.
You got to get rid of Kasich, came in second New Hampshire, got to get rid of Rubio.
He finished ahead of Jeb, so you got to get rid of those two first.
Understand that.
It's like in baseball, if you're in fourth place, you have to beat the teams ahead of you.
It doesn't mean when you play the first-place team, you don't try to beat them.
So it's an attempt here to win on the field.
What Jeb is going to try to do is use South Carolina to emerge as the one remaining establishment candidate that the establishment can coalesce behind as the original dream was way back in the early days of this and take on Trump.
Here's Sarah in Darnstown, Maryland.
Great to have you.
Appreciate your patience and hello.
Hey, Rush, great to talk to you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I agree with your point earlier that the Republicans have missed a huge opportunity, but I just think Trump is not the answer, really for two main reasons.
One, he's not a conservative.
And I think after Mitt lost, we all spent so much time reflecting and saying, well, that's what we got for not electing a conservative.
And I think the other main problem is his demeanor is just not presidential.
I mean, we've spent years still revisiting Clinton and what a disaster that was.
And I just think it would be such a mistake for the Republicans to elect someone or nominate someone who's so borish and classless and have him associated with the Republican Party.
And I want you to keep listening because in the next hour, we're going to get back to these two Trump soundbites where he's asked about this, and he admits that it's all going to change when he becomes president.
That there's a different set of requirements when you're running and you're campaigning and your primaries.
But when you actually, when the whole thing become president, you've got to change.
And he assures people he's going to change.
It was a question specifically related to the kitty cat name that his female audience member called Cruz.
But you know, this conservative angle, your question about Romney is good, but here's the difference.
I know that it's true.
We had a bunch of Republicans sit home in 2012 because Romney wasn't conservative enough, conservative enough, and you're asking, what about Trump?
I think a lot of conservatives, and don't forget, look, this is going to irritate a lot of people, but you look at the exit polling and how it's backed up by the actual returns in New Hampshire.
Conservatives are not the majority of Trump's coalition.
They are not.
He's got a coalition made up of virtually every group of people and every demographic and every nationality, every ethnicity.
And the conservatives that are in his, I think it's not about the conservatism anymore to them.
They're saying, what good has all this conservatism done us anyway?
Now, Sarah, if you have further questions, hang on.
I'll be glad to answer them.
I just am out of time right now.
We've got to go.
Rinse Privus's weighed in on what happened in New Hampshire.
And it was on Wolf Blitzer on CNN.
Have the audio soundbite coming up.
You can be the judge whether or not the RNC establishment even now understands what happened to them and what is happening.
▲
Export Selection