All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 9, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:32
February 9, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, that's exactly right.
It's exactly what I said yesterday about Hillary and her speech transcripts.
The reason she doesn't want those released is because she's going in there and she's praising these banks.
She is just probably thanking them for saving America doing everything.
Probably goes in there and just praises them to the hilt.
That's why everybody wants to see the transcripts of her speeches and she won't even release them.
Been paid $225,250,675,000 to come and give speech to Goldman Sachs.
Will not release the transcript.
Is it any wonder why?
Here she is.
She and Bernie are out there trying to be the biggest bashers of the banks out there.
Now, Hillary's not all in bashing the banks like Bernie is, but she does her share of it.
She does it enough that if the transcripts of her speeches were ever revealed, people would find out that she is in bed with these banks.
They are propping her up.
They are giving her money.
They are donating to her campaign and her foundation.
And she's going to reward them somehow.
You know, if half the people of Vote Democrat found out who really pays for and props up the Democrat Party, they would be outraged.
If they found out, it was the people they hate.
These rich corporate titans, these rich bankers, if they have the foggiest idea that that's who it is basically funding the Democrat Party, along with the unions, can you imagine the hell to pay there would be?
Well, on paper anyway.
Greetings, welcome back.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh here on the day of the New Hampshire primary.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
Email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
I say this next, not to be critical.
I'm just sharing with you genuine emotions.
I had, well, if I've received one of these, I've probably received 10.
I got an email this morning.
Why?
Could you tell me why?
Why are you, why are you, why are you endorsing Rubio?
I'm not endorsing Rubio.
I haven't endorsed anybody.
I haven't endorsed Trump.
I haven't endorsed Cruz.
I haven't endorsed anybody.
Well, okay, well, why are you?
Is it really that complicated, folks?
What I happen to be supporting is when people say something that I think needs to be said, I'm going to amplify it.
To me, all of this is about ideas, and it certainly matters who wins, and it certainly matters the ideas that they have.
Now, if Rubio is out saying what nobody else in the party other than Ted Cruz will say, then I'm not going to condemn him for saying it.
I don't care how many times he says it.
I don't care if he looked robotic when he said it.
Yeah, it didn't look good, but that's not what's important to me.
It's not complicated at all.
Barack Obama has an executed strategy to transform this country.
He has said so.
If you go back and listen to Obama, as we have, in audio sound by stating all the way back to the early 2000s, I don't care if it's single-payer health care, national health care, whatever it is, the problem with equality, the racial problem in this, whatever it is, our superpower status, Obama has let everybody know he doesn't like the way this country was founded.
And he thinks this country needs to be chopped down to size.
And he said when he assumed office and when he campaigned that he was going to transform this country, he loved what Reagan did.
He thought Reagan was transformative, and Reagan was, in the sense that he converted this country for a few short years into an unabashed, no doubt about it, market-based, entrepreneurial, opportunity society, reducing the size of government, at least thematically, and lowering taxes, promoting individual liberty.
Obama thought it was massive what Reagan was able to do.
He disagreed with all of it, but he wanted to do the same thing, but with his ideas.
He's not accidentally making mistakes.
He's not rooted in incompetence and incapability.
Barack Obama is doing exactly what he planned on doing, and he's doing it well.
He's done, I think Obama and Michelle probably pinched themselves at night, unbelieving how easy it has been.
I think they sit there, and when they're honest with themselves, they can't believe how little opposition there has really been to it.
Oh, yeah, there have been some Republicans out there talking about it, but when it comes to actually pushing back and stopping any of this, there hasn't been any.
Obama's got the last budget deal, even he couldn't believe how much the Republicans gave up.
He couldn't believe how much he won.
It's not rooted in incompetence or inexperience what Obama's doing.
It's rooted in whatever you think of it.
He has got his ideas.
He's got his beliefs.
They are not great about this country.
He thinks this country has been unjust and immoral from its founding, and it's his job to change it and turn it around.
And that's what he's doing.
Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are the only two guys saying it.
I'm not going to go out and condemn somebody for however many times they say it when I think it needs to be said.
I think everybody needs to learn it.
I think everybody, as many people as possible, need to understand what has been going on.
And when you have, like I said yesterday, folks, how come these governors do not say this about Obama?
Take your pick of any of them.
Kasich, Christie, any number of them, Rick Perry, an exception, but for the most part, none of them will go anywhere near the idea is doing this.
Obama is doing this on purpose.
They all fall back on the fact that Obama's just inexperienced.
He wasn't qualified.
He wasn't prepared.
And that's why we don't want Rubio in there.
And that's why we don't want Cruz in there.
These guys haven't done anything.
They have no experience doing it.
We governors, we make tough executive decisions every day, like destroying our states and working with Obama.
And that's the key.
They can no more go out and tell the truth about Barack Obama because they have helped him.
Now, that may sound a little bit hard-hitting or brutal, but they have.
They have worked with Obama.
They can't turn around and then accuse Obama of having this negative agenda because they have helped him make it possible.
Not that that was their desire.
See, that makes it even worse.
If you ask me, I don't think any of these Republican governors agree with Obama that the country sucks.
I don't think they agree with him that it was founded in an unjust and immoral way, but they didn't stand up to it for whatever reason.
They needed money, whatever wanted photo ops.
I don't care what the reason was.
They worked with Obama.
They didn't push back.
They did not, as Republicans, tell the people in their states why the destruction that's happening in this country is happening.
They didn't point the right finger at the right direction, the right person to blame for this, which is crucial in turning this around.
It ought to be a gigantic, teachable moment, and yet we haven't had any teaching.
It ought to be the greatest opportunity to contrast who we are and what we believe with our political opponents because they are succeeding every day in their mission to fundamentally transform and change this country from a beacon of freedom to a beacon of welfare, state, dependence, and forever debt.
They want to cut this country down to where it's no longer a superpower.
They don't want to have any international involvement whatsoever.
They believe the United States is the problem in the world, not the solution.
And we have people on our side who won't say it.
And in fact, won't say it, can't say it, because they have, in one form or another, at one time or another, worked with and cooperated with Obama.
And I'm sure they were saying, hey, Rush, I mean, I got to deal with it as I see it.
I'm a governor of a state.
My state needs money.
My state needs this federal cooperation.
I can't go out there and be bashing Obama.
I'm not talking about bashing Obama.
I'm talking about telling the truth about why the country's in the dregs that it's in, why the country's headed in the direction it's in.
We've got to turn it around.
We've got to stop it.
Too many people in this country being educated that socialism is great, socialism is fair, that socialism is the great.
We are killing the engine that creates wealth.
And we are going to maintain wealth in the hands of the people who have it now and nobody else.
We are putting in place obstacle after obstacle after obstacle toward the creation of wealth by average ordinary people.
And it's happening because there is an ideology leading this country called liberalism, socialism, whatever you want to call it, that wants total power over citizens, believes that average people cannot take care of themselves, will not make the right decisions with their own money or otherwise.
And a great teachable moment has gone to waste here for seven years, except there have been people who have been speaking up.
So when Rubio comes out and says what he says about Obama over and over again, I'm going to amplify it because Rubio's right.
When Ted Cruz says it, same thing.
When Donald Trump earlier in the campaign is demonstrating that you don't have to fear political correctness, I'm going to point it out, and I'm going to say it's a great thing.
When Donald Trump is demonstrating that you don't have to be afraid of the media, that you can triumph being who you are if you are confident, if you believe in what you believe.
We don't need to tiptoe through the American political system when we're trying to save the country.
You don't have to be afraid of these things.
All of this has been in evidence.
I have been trying to point it out.
Whenever somebody says or does anything I happen to agree with, that's what I promote.
Sadly, I don't think it's all contained inside one candidate.
There are a couple that are there that come close to embodying all of this, and some that don't embody any of it.
But I have always promoted the ideas, I believe, and I have always championed people who publicly articulate them, even if they might have a credibility problem here or there.
And I think it happens to be very crucial.
I think it's relevant as it can be that as many people as possible understand that what's happening in this country is not coincidence.
It's not unfortunate because we elected somebody who doesn't know what he's doing.
We elected somebody who knows exactly what he's doing, did not have the guts to tell us what he was going to do, per se.
If Obama had told you all of this that was going to happen, would you have voted for him?
There is no way in Sam Hill that he would have been certainly not re-elected.
And he wouldn't have been elected in the first place, in my view, if Obama had been honest about what his purpose is.
If Obama had promised to take the national debt to $20 trillion from $12 trillion when he was in office, when he assumed office, if he had promised to make a total mess of our health care system so that in the future he can have the government run the whole thing, if he had told you, my plan is to so screw up the health care system that in a number of years you're going to be begging the government to do it, would he have been elected?
No.
He had to position this as though it was already broken and he was the savior come in and fix it all.
He was the guy going to make all this great.
He was going to reduce global warming and lower disease levels.
He was going to bring about love and unity and respect for the U.S. all over the world.
How's that working out for us?
It's the exact opposite of what he said he was going to do.
I'm sorry, people need to know it.
We have a Republican Party that is not engaged in one day's worth of this kind of pushback over the course of seven years.
And it's just too important to continue to operate as though this is just politics as usual.
And Democrats happen to win two elections in a row.
And it's coming up on our turn.
This is not your dad's Democrat Party.
And it's sure as heck in your grandfather's Democrat Party.
This is a Democrat Party that Fidel Castro and Mao Seitong and V.I. Lennon would applaud and say, keep going, guys.
You're on your way.
This is not the Democrat Party everybody thought existed for the working man, the blue-collar guy, the union assembly line worker.
The downtrodden, the thirsty, the hungry, the little guy being spoken.
The little guy is getting creamed by this administration, along with everybody else except rich, uber-rich people who buy and pay and get involved in cronyism with the administration or the regime.
They're doing gangbusters.
And they're all going to see that Obama does gangbusters after he leaves office.
He's going to be fine.
Michelle's going to be fine, just like the Clintons are fine.
$115 million in speeches in 10 years.
I'm sorry, folks.
There aren't that many people with that much money who care that much and think the Clintons are that special and that unique in order to pay them that much money to hear them come in and flap their gums.
There's something else going on.
And you and I know what it is.
They're all buying influence on the come in the idea that Hillary might someday be president.
No reason.
These people don't even get invited to cocktail parties in the afternoon in the Hamptons anymore because all the dregs they attract.
But somebody else should go out and pay them gazillions of dollars for speeches, fandom spit, 25-minute, 30-minute speech, and Hillary won't even release transcript because if she did, people voting for her in the Democrat Party would look at the transcript.
My God, this woman may as well be a banker.
She thinks they're the greatest people on earth.
She's promising to protect them.
She's promising to look out after their interests.
It would be the greatest betrayal your average ordinary Democrat socialist voter could discover.
But they would never find such a transcript of a speech by Bernie Sanders because he wouldn't do it.
And as such, Bernie Sanders didn't get paid $115 million over the last six years or 10 years or whatever it is.
So that's why I'm making a big deal out of what Marco Rubio said.
It's really simple.
He's right.
And a lot more people need to hear it.
And even more than that, need to start understanding it and believing it.
We'll be back after this.
Let me illustrate this one more way.
You go back to Jeb Bush.
Jeb Bush and his comments about not blaming Obama for a single thing, promising everybody, unlike his predecessor, he's not going to blame his predecessor if he happens to be elected president.
I mean, that, how can you possibly say that knowing this is being done on purpose?
What is your purpose in being in the White House?
You know, I have to tell you something, folks.
I have been perplexed.
I understand the Bush family, and I know them, and I appreciate them.
And I know the reverence they hold for the office of the presidency and the traditions therein.
I understand all that.
But what's been done to this country since George Bush left office, I don't know how he stays quiet about it.
Now, there are certain things.
Let me put myself in the equation.
The best way to explain this.
If I were ever president for two terms and had succeeded in the agenda I believe in and had succeeded in promoting some idea, and the next guy comes in and starts tearing it apart and ripping it into shreds and lying about me, I am not going to stay silent about it.
If it mattered that much to me that I ran for president to try to save the country, to try to put my ideas into action nationally, somebody comes along, and I guarantee you Obama's not going to remain silent.
I am here to tell you that whoever the next president is, Republican or Democrat, that does one thing to Obamacare or anything else that he holds dear, he's going to be out there calling whoever he likes in the media that day, and they're going to make him the lead story in the nightly news saying Barack Obama is warning the United States of what the new president is doing.
He's not going to sit by and let somebody undo this, which only makes sense if your heart and soul's in it, if you really believe it.
So I, this, making a pledge not to criticize your predecessor when your predecessor has admitted that his objective was to transform this country and turn it into something it was never founded to be.
And you want, you're saying that for praise, for like getting a gold star.
Somehow that means you're polite and well-mannered and you're going to be executing proper presidential decorum?
At what point do the ideas matter?
At what point does your core belief and your principles matter?
And at what point do they not?
Well, Russia just isn't done.
Past presidents, past presidents are supposed to disappear.
It's the polite thing to do.
The American people have spoken.
New man's been elected or woman.
And it's time for you to, you understand that, maybe for a couple of weeks, but if I'd poured my heart and soul in it and my core and everything else, and some lying SOB comes along, lying about me and impugning the things that I have done for the country and especially the successes that had been had, I'm sorry.
The first question on my mind is not going to be, what's the tea time today?
No, I don't know.
Maybe that wouldn't be the case.
Maybe if I were actually elected president, serve two terms, and maybe the power of the institution and its protocols and its traditions would overcome me.
I don't know.
But I'm just trying to find a way here to express to you why when the power of ideas, why I think they're important, words mean things.
And I'm just befuddled by people who think or who want applause and credit for Not criticizing my predecessor or my opponent even.
I mean, what criticism of Obama's going on now for crying out loud?
I really thank all of you who are holding on the phones.
It's your turn now.
We're starting with Randy and Findlay, Ohio.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Conservative vegetarian dittos to start out with.
Well, thank you very much, sir.
Trust as a conservative vegetarian.
You're not militant about it.
Exactly.
Good, good, good.
What I wanted to ask was, what evidence is there for Trump supporters to think that he would have any more respect for the Constitution than Obama does?
I mean, they're both progressive, and Trump has seemed to change his mind on so many things lately.
But the main thing is just, why do they think he would have, why he would honor the Constitution?
Have you asked that of any Trump supporters that you know?
No, I don't know very many.
I do know one in particular, but no, I have not asked him.
See, because I think most Trump supporters lost you when you started comparing him to Obama.
I think they don't get that.
They don't see Trump as a progressive, and I don't think they see him as a conservative.
They see him as not of Washington.
They see him as an outsider who understands them, understands their plight, who joins them in thinking the problems in this country all emanate from a too stupid government that's too big and too overbearing and too regulatory.
I don't think when it comes to Trump, I don't think his supporters are even thinking who he might put on the Supreme Court.
I think it's much more personal.
Well, I just want to know why, if we don't go by the Constitution, what do we have to guide us?
Well, agreed.
Agreed.
I need to ask, what is it that Trump's done, said, not said, not done that made you believe he is not respectful of it?
Well, where he talks, he sounds a lot like, I hate to use the analogy like Obama again, that he has a phone and a pen.
He makes it sound like, well, I'm going to do this.
I'm going to do that.
There's not any.
I haven't heard of it.
Oh, I get it.
You're worried that Trump is sounding like Obama in the authoritarian sense.
That Obama's out there saying if he doesn't get what he wants with Congress, he'll just do it with an executive order.
And Trump's out there saying he's going to do this.
He's going to do that.
He's going to do that.
And you're worried that his supporters are signing off on the same kind of authoritarian, outside of the Constitutional behavior that Obama is engaging in, yet that they're supporting it for Trump.
It might surprise people to learn that some people actually wouldn't mind that.
This is the danger, I think, when you have, and I don't know how many Trump supporters this is.
It's probably not a lot, but there's some people who think that the country is in such dire straits that it may take drastic action that we don't have time for to go through the normal channels to stop some of this stuff, to reverse it.
If Obama does an executive order, letting him in, that we're going to do an executive order, kicking them out.
The hill with going through Congress can't trust those creeps anyway.
And I think Trump's the guy to do it.
So I've had mostly, you know, who articulates those fears to me?
A bunch of leftist media types who sit there and applaud it when Obama does it.
But they worry that the Trump support base is ignorant and is by quirk of fate actually endorsing and supporting almost dictatorial powers in the executive.
Yet applaud it when Obama engages in those kinds of things.
Like I said, I've spent weeks and months analyzing and explaining the Trump support base that I it's it'd be too long to go through the whole thing again.
I just want to remind you of something, though.
When Trump lights into Ted Cruz, there's nothing authoritarian about it.
He lights into Ted Cruz as unable to work with the guys in the Senate because they hate him.
Trump says you've got to do deals with those guys.
Remember, Trump said, I can do deals with Pelosi.
I can do deals with Schumer.
I know those guys.
I like them.
I can do deals with those people.
But Trump says that Cruz can't because they hate him.
So Cruz would be a disaster.
Well, wait a minute.
Trump's.
What do you mean, do deals with those people?
And Trump's asked him, what do you mean?
We don't want to do deals with those.
Trump says, no, no, no.
The deals I do, they lose.
Oh, okay, fine.
Yeah, the deals I do, we're going to win.
My deals win.
When we do a deal, my ideas triumph.
When we do a deal, it's my deal.
I'm going to kick their ass.
He said, oh, okay, fine.
If you're going to deal with them and kick their butts, then fine.
But make no mistake out there, Andy.
Trump has sent signals that he's going to work with people and make deals with them, even though he's going to snooker them.
Not snooker.
He's going to beat them back, beat them down.
Here's John in Cherry Valley, Illinois.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, I'll be brief and I'll get off the phone as quickly as I can.
I don't care about vulgar language.
I didn't even hear what he said.
Everything was bleeped out.
Maybe 2,000 people heard what he said.
So I want the country to get better.
I don't care about language.
Let's get this thing straightened out as quickly as possible.
It seems like the press is making a bigger deal out of vulgar language than Bill Clinton's vulgar actions in the White House.
No question about it.
No question.
No question.
They want to condemn Trump for what he said and applaud Clinton for what he did.
Yeah, well, that's ridiculous.
And I'm going to say one more thing: second point.
I'm tired of these politicians saying, go with experience.
We got experience.
Yeah, we've got experience for about two, three decades.
We got $19 trillion in and we get screwed over.
So they have a lot of experience.
I hear you.
Exactly.
Left over.
Exactly right.
Where's all this experience getting us?
Nowhere, nowhere.
So let's go somewhere.
Desperate times, you've got to get someone that's different.
We gave Obama a chance.
Let's give this guy a chance.
So I got two things to say.
Go Trump, and we don't need another Bush.
Thank you, Rush.
Hang on a minute.
Did you really not hear the word that the woman shouted at Trump?
No, I didn't hear nothing.
You still don't know what it is?
I know it was supposed to be.
I heard.
No, I really didn't.
Honest, Scott, I didn't.
You don't know what the, even now, you do not know what the woman called Ted Cruz?
No, and if she said something bad, I don't care.
I don't care.
You're going to do everybody else in this country doesn't use vulgar language once in a while.
See, I find myself in the same dilemma that Trump had.
I got a guy.
I'll tell you, well, let's just play the bike.
You missed it, and you need to hear this.
You're upset while they're all going on and on and on about it.
Here's what it is.
They asked Ted Cruz, serious question.
Well, what do you think of waterboarding?
Is it okay?
And honestly, I thought he'd say absolutely.
And he didn't.
He said, well, he's concerned about the answer because some people.
She just said a terrible thing.
You know what she said?
Shout it out because I don't want to say.
Okay.
You're not allowed to say, and I never expect to hear that from you again.
She said, I never expect to hear that from you again.
She said he's a pussy.
That's terrifying.
Terror.
There you go.
There you go, John.
That was it.
Oh, you know, come on.
Rush.
I mean.
Is this not that big a deal?
No, it's nothing.
It's nothing.
I thought it was a lot worse.
I'm thinking of another P word.
Not that.
Exactly right.
Just called him a coward.
The thing is, it's not even true.
The one thing Ted Cruz is not is that.
There is no way Ted Cruz is a coward.
It just isn't the case.
But you had the woman shouting at Trump.
Trump played this for all it's worth.
I don't.
What other P word is he talking about?
John, I got people asking me what you mean by the other P word.
What do you mean by your P word?
Well, I'm just that's one word I can't say.
I'm not going to say it, okay, Russ.
It's not important.
It didn't happen.
I really didn't hear the word.
So now that I really heard the word.
See, this is how it works.
This is stupid.
It's not important.
You're tempting everybody here.
You're toying with everybody here on the other P word.
They got everybody dying to know what you mean, and you won't say it.
Well, I thought she called him something else.
It's what you can probably do with a pin when you.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Okay, got it.
Okay, I'm not kidding.
You penis, that kind of thing, right?
They've got that little word.
There you go.
There's all kinds of ways you can get the point across.
That's what we professional, highly trained broadcast specialists are capable of doing here and remaining legal and safe all at the same time.
It is an interesting juxtaposition.
I mean, here you have a presidential campaign in the old live-free or die state New Hampshire going on, New Hampshire primary, and everybody is attempting to put forth a deeply serious, studied presidential image and character and countenance, temperament.
And then over here, you have Trump, who happens to be leading.
And now what's happening, you know, all the stories are coming out of the woodwork.
Well, you know, you remember what Newt's mom called Connie Chung?
Have you forgotten that one?
That was the old B word.
And there have been other, I mean, Barbara Bush, I think, one's called Geraldine Ferraro, something along the lines of the B word.
Nobody uses a seaboard.
That's the one thing nobody, because once again, it's undefeated.
Nobody is going to go there.
The idea that this is something that doesn't happen and is outrageous.
It does represent a coarsening.
Been warning about this for, well, the whole time I've been doing this program, but we've been losing the battle here.
That's my point.
Compare the pregame ceremonies, Super Bowl, a halftime.
Two completely different Americas, portrayed and celebrated.
Joanna in Corpus Christie.
Got to be Texas Hive.
It's an honor to speak to you.
Thank you very much.
So I want you to start off by saying I am a very avid Trump supporter, and I think he may be the only one who's going to be able to get the job done ultimately.
But I have a theory about his performance in the caucuses versus the primaries that I wanted to get your two cents on, see what your thoughts are about this.
Sure.
So I saw a bumper sticker as I was driving onto the base, and it said Trump, finally, somebody with balls.
And I thought.
Well, here we go.
We've charted a course and we're not deviating.
Right, exactly.
So I thought it was an awesome bumper sticker, but I thought to myself, you know, it takes balls to put that bumper sticker on your car these days because it's been my experience at least that people who do support Trump don't want to maybe admit it as much as they would if they were for another candidate because they don't want to be lumped into or to be considered racist.
Joanna, wait a second.
I don't know about that because Trump's crowds are much larger than anybody else's.
There are people that have no problem demonstrating there for Trump by showing up through all kinds of inclement weather going to his appearance.
I don't know that there's that kind of reluctance, but your theory is that it manifested itself in Iowa.
Yes, that in a caucus, it's not anonymous, whereas a primary it is.
And so people who might not want to admit that they're Trump supporters to their friends and colleagues might be more likely to vote for him in an anonymous vote for the caucus.
So a variation on the wilder effect.
Well, I have the wilder effect is when you tell a pollster that you're going to vote for a black guy, but you don't.
You're afraid to, you don't want the pollster thinking you're a racist, so you'll tell him you're voting for the black candidate, but when it comes time to vote, you don't.
So the black candidate polls really well, but then loses the election, and the liberals in the media are scratching their heads, and they've concocted the wilder effect to explain it.
He was a black candidate for governor of Virginia and was polling crazily and lost, which it ticked them all off.
But you might be right.
There might be people that not want to go to a caucus and have to defend Trump, speak up for him.
Who knows?
Let me ask you this.
I've got about 45 seconds.
There's a budding theory.
I'll play you the soundbite the next hour.
That if Trump does not win New Hampshire by 15 points, that is equivalent to losing it.
How do you see that?
Well, I don't think that's going to happen, but that's one losing it.
I think he's going to win the election.
He's going to win the nomination.
Well, okay.
And I'm going to be president.
Are you military?
I am.
You are.
I'm active duty army.
Okay, that's fascinating.
Well, look where we are here.
I was going to ask what she said means, but sadly, I'm out of time here.
But what do you people think of his theory?
You'll hear it.
Frank Luntz is the guy bandying it about.
If Trump does not win by a minimum of 15, that he may as well consider it a disappointment.
We will be back.
Don't go away.
Big news, Capitol Hill.
There's some hearings going on.
Intelligence experts have said today that there will be ISIS attacks in this country this year, and that ISIS is successfully infiltrating all the refugees that are entering the country.
I mean, they said this definitively, folks.
All the while Obama and Hillary.
No, no, no.
ISIS, John Kerry's out there.
They're not even Islamists, John Kerry.
▲
Export Selection