All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 18, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:46
January 18, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now, look, here's another thing, folks.
As you go through the primary, you get mad at Cruz, you get mad at Trump.
Do not take your eye off the Republican establishment and do not do not let yourself get sidetracked.
Because I'm going to tell you what, if the Republican establishment, what is it?
Say Ted Cruz wins this, they're going to do their best to undermine him.
They might even do so if Trump wins.
See, right now the Republican establishment calculation.
Now keep in mind who these people are.
They've been trying to drum conservatives and their influence out of the party in various ways for quite a while.
The donor class is who they prefer to listen to for the most part.
And the consultants, who are every bit members of the establishment as well, they have been doing their best.
Well, they've been doing two things.
They've been hoping that everybody would eventually see Trump the way they see him.
And they see Trump as a pretender of Charlotte and a Barnum and Bailey Circus Act, who's unserious, maybe not even a Republican when you get right down to it, but more importantly than that, somebody they can't get can't control and can't do business with, and they've been doing everything they can to undermine him, thinking it's going to happen, trying to urge it.
And over here, they've got Cruz, who they literally despise because he's principled conservative and they can't deal with that.
They don't want to deal with that, and they are intimidated by it.
Make no mistake about that.
So that's why the hateful comments come about Cruz and his personality and so forth and so on.
But in the midst of all this, like I told you in the last hour, and I saw this commented on Friday, in fact, how the establishments now decided that Trump may be inevitable.
And so they are going to sidle up.
They are going to, in an effort to keep this all away from Ted Cruz, that they are going to make an accord, so to speak, with Trump on the theory that Trump is nowhere near as principled as Cruz is, and thus would be open to making deals with them as they wish to deal with the Democrats and other accredited members of the establishment or ruling class.
When it comes to Cruz, they don't see there's any way of Cruz bending and shaping to them.
So they're thinking maybe they have a better shot at having a coexistence where they run the show here with Trump.
Now, I'm not going to do whether they're right or wrong, but it's not the point.
The point is that in this campaign, as you let your emotions get ratcheted up in one direction or another.
Don't forget that at the end of this process, there is still the Republican establishment to deal with.
And maybe even in the midst of it, in the midst of the process, in the midst of the primaries.
If it's Trump, they think they can deal with as of today.
If it's Cruz, they probably would do what they could to.
Well, you've heard them say they'd vote for Hillary.
I mean, you've seen it, I've seen it.
There's been numerous stories out there from some of them even allowed themselves to be quoted.
That if it's Cruz, and some of them have said it about Trump, that they would vote Hillary.
Now they're moderating in their attitudes about Trump.
And that's only because they haven't been able to stop him.
And they don't see the Jeb certainly not rising to the task.
And they see Rubio with some problems here, so they're at their wit's end.
My only point is just keep your eye on them during all of this, as you do with uh the two candidates or three or however many you think are viable.
Now let's go to the audio sound bites.
This is from Meet, sorry, this today's show, this morning, Matt Wower speaking with uh F. Chuck Todd of Meet the Press.
Now, this this is about the recurring theme That Trump continues to put himself in a precarious position with talk radio.
You know, talk radio, the people that are just entertainers.
Um they're not really to be taken seriously.
They're they're just entertainers.
But now all of a sudden, the establishment's turning to talk radio to deal with Trump.
It's all of a sudden now it's our job to take Trump out.
Or our job to take out who they've ever it is that they don't like.
So Matt Wauer says to Chuck Todd, Chuck, if you go on the campaign trail, you go to a Donald Trump event, the people in that room love to hear Trump skewer other people.
They love to hear Trump skewer other politicians, especially Democrats.
But it seems there's a line when it comes to Ted Cruz.
It seems that Trump voters do not like it when Trump goes after him.
Well, look, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump, they do share some of the same sort of anti-establishment outside supporters.
Donald Trump in his war against political correctness, it has really been very popular with the talk radio crowd.
But Ted Cruz, sort of a more strident confrontational conservative in Washington, he's popular with the talk radio crowd.
And the talk radio crowd, they're more principled conservatives.
If they had a choice, they'd probably vote Cruz over Trump.
This is why this is a very precarious strategy for him.
He could hurt himself as much as he helps himself by going after Cruz.
Helps himself.
Who's Chuck thinking he's helping himself with?
I'm not disagreeing.
I'm just who does Chuck think Trump is helping himself with going after Cruz.
We're in a Republican primary here, don't forget.
Although, let me remind you, South Carolina's open.
South Carolina's an open primary.
That means that any number of shenanigans take place there.
But note again here how all of a sudden today, talk radio has the chance to make or break the Republican nominee to define who is and who isn't.
And Trump had better be careful because he's in a very precarious position.
Because if he ticks off the wrong people in talk radio, he may hurt himself.
See, I think all of this is predicated on the fact that people in a Trump crowd are brain dead.
Whether Chuck Todd means this or not, and or whether or not it's a conscious thought, what he's essentially saying here is that the audience that Trump has or Cruz has really a talk radio audience.
And a talk radio audience does not have minds of their own.
They only think what they think after they listen to the radio.
They don't know anything until they listen to radio.
They don't know what to think about anything until they listen to the radio.
And so that's why F. Chuck Todd can say, you know what?
Trump could be sailing along.
His audience could be very happy with him, they could really love him, and then they hear on talk radio how Trump's making a mistake, and then all of a sudden they'll turn on Trump.
I don't think it works that way, folks.
I, for example, and I don't know how many times I've had to explain this, I do not think you are mind-numbed robots or brain dead.
I never have.
I don't think you tune in here every day to find out from a standpoint of ignorance what you have to think every day.
You already think what you think.
You listen to this program because it's a good show.
And to the extent that you hear things you agree with, fine, it validates what you agree.
But even if you don't agree, you still listen because it's a good show.
It isn't complicated here.
Best show, really, best show ever.
But as Trump would say.
But the point is, in the minds of all these other people, you are incapable.
The only way, for example, the only way Trump can hurt himself is not by what he does.
It's what we tell you about what he does.
And I simply reject that.
But they think it.
And I detect it all the time.
And it's it's insulting, yeah, But it's the way they look at this.
And I don't think it's just you.
I think most of the American people are thought of the same way F. Chuck inadvertently expressed himself here.
In other words, the talk radio crowd is a specific group of people who turns to talk radio to find out what to think.
And then there are the other people who listen to the drive-bys, and they listen or watch the drive-bys to find out what to think.
And then the New York Times readers, they're idiots too, and they're brain dead, and they don't know what to think until they read the New York Times.
Well, that may be true.
But I think there's a universal contempt for the people of this country by media types, establishment types, or what have you.
Here's Molly Ball.
She was on CBS Slay the Nation yesterday.
This was during the round hall.
Sorry, the uh round table.
And John Dickerson, who is a he's a hack.
He's a Democrat, he's a political director.
He's never going to host the show.
And he was talking to uh uh Molly Ball, who Molly Ball, who is Molly Ball won the war.
Uh well I don't know who she is, but she was on the show there.
And he said to her, hey, look, there's a race going on on the one hand between Republican candidates and then Nikki Haley gave a response to the State of the Union, in which she said very warm things about undocumented workers, saying that they shouldn't be treated harshly.
And she also talked about anger taking over too much of the party.
Seemed like the Republican Party was sending a message to itself.
She's a staff writer for the Atlantic.
Okay.
Did anybody understand this question?
Let me read this to you again.
Okay, here's Dickerson.
He's asking Molly Ball, staff writer for the Atlantic.
There's a race going on on the one hand between Republican candidates.
Okay, and then Nikki Haley gave a response to the State of the Union, in which she said very warm things about illegals, saying that they shouldn't be treated harshly.
She also talked about anger taking over too much in the party.
It seemed like the Republican Party was sending a message to itself.
Oh, I get it.
He's asking her about Nikki.
And that's already been dealt with.
Nikki's already walked it back.
But they're still trying to keep it alive because it was the party going after us.
Oh, I get it.
Anyway, here's what Molly Ball, staff writer for the Atlantic, said Cruz is extremely well positioned here.
And I am not convinced that Trump actually won that exchange with Cruz in the debate, because the goodwill that Ted Cruz has with the sort of talk radio faction that's been giving Donald Trump a free pass is going to really help him now that those two are in conflict.
This is just fascinating to me, folks.
Once again, here, the talk radio faction.
So here's what they believe.
Obviously, you have Cruz and Trump, and they represent the top tier, the two most likely candidates here, one of whom to win.
And then you throw in the talk radio faction, which has extended good will toward Ted Cruz and a free pass toward Donald Trump.
But now that Donald Trump is going after Cruz, well, then the talk radio faction has been giving Trump a free pass, is now going to be mad at Trump.
Let me ask a question.
You know what this is based on is the belief that...
Somehow, that conservatives believe that Trump and Cruz would never ever be critical of each other, that there was a pact or some such thing, as though both of them can win.
And both of them can't.
There's only going to be one nominee.
The nominee, whoever he is, is not going to share it with anybody.
And so once again, we have a apparently a belief by the analysts here, the drive-bys, thinking that neither of these two were ever going to criticize each other.
And then all of a sudden, when it started, oh no.
Oh no, Trump's going after Cruz.
What's the talk radio faction going to do?
As though you are incapable of figuring it out yourself.
And there's also another hidden meaning, and that is that all these people in the drive bys and in the establishment are secretly hoping that we in talk radio will take one of these two out.
And who depends on the day to day.
One day they want us to take Trump out, the next day they want us to take Cruz out.
And most of the days they just they think we're inconsequential entertainers.
Now all of a sudden, we are the arbiters.
We hold all the cards, we have all the power to determine who survives and who doesn't.
It's amazing.
Here's Kevin Maddon.
Kevin Madden is was on this week, the round table with Stephanopoulos.
He's a Republican strategist.
And this is about Nikki Haley's response to the State of the Union.
Stephanopoulos said, now, Speaker Ryan chose Nikki Haley to give the response for the Republican Party to Governor South Carolina, and she did have that very direct shot at Donald Trump, Kevin.
There was also a backlash.
So many voters out there felt like they were being scolded by this establishment that they feel that there's a canyon between them and the Republicans in Washington.
They feel like that their anger is legitimate and that their voice is not being heard, and that the last thing they want from is a another establishment, you know, leader in Washington or being chosen by leaders in Washington to tell them that their anger's not legitimate.
And I think that's why you saw so much in the like the talk radio world and also so many among the grassroots conservatives start to actually push back on Nikki Haley.
He's right.
I mean, whatever he is, he's a Republican strategist, but he's right.
He's correct in his assessment there is a canyon between the establishment and the base.
And the establishment is locked in a past of 10 to 15 years ago.
Maybe even 25 years ago.
You know the old angry white man thing.
That's a trope the Democrats used to use in the Republicans.
Oh, no, no, we're not mad, we're not mad.
And it's always been a pejorative to say if somebody they're angry, somehow they're unserious or they're unstable or they're not all there.
Fact of the matter is anger is the legitimate reaction to what's happening to the country.
Anger coupled with the fear is quite natural, and it would be very troubling and worrisome if there weren't any anger over what's happening.
But the Republicans seem to believe that anger is going to worry the independents.
It's going to send the independent running right back to the Democrats.
Because the independents, you know, they don't like anger.
They don't like confrontation, they don't like people going to war when you want everybody to get along.
And so the Republicans are trying to tell everybody they can get along and they're not angry and so forth.
And the blowback on this was huge because it was legitimate.
Let me leave you with one more before the break.
Steve Schmidt ran McCain's campaign.
Normally, huge, big anti-talk radio, pro-establishment guys on depressed or meet the depressed.
And Chuck Todd says, is this fight one between Cruz and Trump?
Is this the fight the establishment's been waiting for?
Look, right now you look at Trump's strength across the country in the national polls, all these establishment candidates, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Christie, they need Ted Cruz to beat Donald Trump in Iowa.
If Ted Cruz doesn't win the state of Iowa, Donald Trump is gone.
He's going to win New Hampshire.
He's going to be very, very tough to catch as this race moves south and moves into the bigger states.
It's a fascinating win.
Analyze this one too when we get back.
Okay, so what Steve Schmidt was saying here, the establishment right now is rooting for Cruz in Iowa because they think if Trump wins and Iowa's gonna run the table and it's over.
And yet there are stories about how the establishment now thinking they've got to pretty much get in bed with Trump.
But don't forget that what I think is the blockbuster of last week.
I this guy's last name is his last name is O'Connell.
He's a young millennial.
He uh Republican consultant strategist advisory is at their all of their uh uh retreats and so forth.
He is the guy who wrote and believes that if Cruz is the Republican nominee, that's the worst thing that could happen.
The second no the no, that'd be the second worst thing.
Then the worst thing can happen would be Cruz elected president.
This is a Republican fundraiser consultant saying that Cruz winning the presidency would set the Republican Party back a generation in the modernization it must have if it's to survive long term.
The Republican Party must make peace with the gays, he said.
We must make peace with the LGBTs.
We've got to get serious about climate change.
And what else did he say?
Oh, yeah, we have to understand once and for all that the Reagan fetish is over and done with.
We've got to cast it aside and never ever go back to it.
Now, he's not alone.
There are a lot of Republican establishment types.
That's why I'm telling you, keep your eye on them no matter how this primary works out, because they're still going to be there after we have a winner and thus a loser.
And if they don't get what they want here, don't be surprised if they undermine.
This is, you know.
you Yeah, that's the guy, Ford O'Connell.
He is the author of that piece we quoted Friday.
Well, maybe Thursday, late last week.
But he's not the only one.
Now, I want you to stop and think of that.
And if you didn't hear this last Thursday or Friday, whenever I want you to hear this now.
Ford O'Connell, Republican establishment uh millennial, young guy, fundraiser, strategist, what whatever these guys call themselves.
But he goes to the establishment meetings, the retreats and so forth, party leadership.
And actually has written that for the party to succeed long term, it's exactly what you've heard today.
We've got to reach out to Hispanics if we ever hope to win the White House again.
We've got to stop our war on women, as though we're conducting one if we ever hope to win the White House again.
So there's an inside the party, there is this uh uh apparently evolving strategy.
The party must modernize.
And if it doesn't, it will cease to exist very, very soon.
And by modernize, it must stamp out all of the conservative vestiges.
We have got to reach out to the gays and embrace them and tell them we love them.
And we've got to wholeheartedly embrace uh gay marriage and the whole LGBT agenda.
That we we have to uh do comprehensive immigration reform.
We can't any longer uh stand in the way or oppose this.
We've got to get rid of this fetish that some of the old Republicans have with Ronald Reagan.
We've got to broom that.
We've as long as we keep having this fetish with Reagan, these ties to the 80s, we're gonna ever forever remain a backward minority party.
We have got to modernize.
And this guy went as far to say that if Ted Cruz, or or take your pick of any other conservative nominee, any conservative nominee wins nomination and wins the White House, that will set the party back.
Now stop and think of that.
If a conservative Republican wins the White House, this guy and others like him think it will set the party back and bring to a screeching halt this much-needed modernizing.
You know what this is.
This is a bunch of new fangled Republicans, and I use the term very liberally, who are not deciding to the con the Republican Party consists of A, B, C, D, and E, and in that A, B, C and D is conservatism.
Let's face it, the Republican Party's number one identity is conservative, small government, less intrusive.
Now, we know that hasn't been in practice for a long time, but that's the that's the imagery.
They want to broom that.
So they don't really want to become Republicans.
What they are trying to do is redefine what Republican is under the under the existing umbrella of the party and have it change.
It's uh, you can call it a silent coup d'etat, so to speak, if you will.
Some people look at conservatives as running a coup against the party.
I don't think that's what's going on.
The party, to one degree or another, has always been known as a party of low taxes, pro-entrepreneurism, pro-innovation, pro-liberty, pro-feedom, freedom constitution, all of that.
Smaller government, smaller taxes, less intrusion, fewer regulations.
This new bunch wants no part of that.
I why don't they just become Democrats?
Wouldn't it just be simpler to join the Democrat Party and take over that stuff that you want's already there?
And if that's how you want people to think of you, that you don't like Reagan, that you're very much into gay marriage and all that, just become a Democrat.
I'm sure they'd love to have you.
But no, they they want to come in and under the theory of saving the Republican Party, they want to modernize it and turn it into something it really has never been.
And that's the battle that's been going on here the past 20 years, and you could even take this battle back and say it was being fought during the 80s with Reagan, but it's really intensified.
I don't know why they don't just sign on to the Democrat Party and be done with it.
Because it is they actually, if you ask me her trying to take over the Republican Party, it looks like it's conservatives trying to, but we're actually being pushed out or marginalized.
And we're at a point now where the establishment, the people we're talking about, don't like either of these two front runners.
Because neither of these front runners take the party where these brainiacs think the party needs to go.
Trump doesn't for whatever various reasons, and Cruz doesn't because he's a conservative.
And I don't think these people have the slightest idea how to win.
I don't think they understand putting together majorities.
I don't think they at all understand a majority of the American people.
What they understand is what the media says.
They're totally prison in prison to what the media says.
Whatever world the media creates is the one they believe actually exists.
And they're out of touch.
And that's why there's so much anger, and that's why the circumstances here have got so many people roiled.
R-O-I-L-E-D.
It's not hard to understand.
Let's go back to the phones to uh Braden in Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Great to have you, sir.
I'm glad you waited.
You're next.
Hey, thanks, Russ.
We love you out here.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Listen, aside from Trump's big rhetoric, he's the perfect establishment candidate because of his, you know, lifelong liberal views.
You know, Trump and Cruz are diametric opposites.
Trump has many liberal views where Cruz has been rock solid forever.
You know.
Uh the reason Trump said Cruz was a uh a nasty guy this weekend is because he tries to personally destroy every person that goes against him.
He's attacked Levin, he's attacked Rich Lowry, he called Michelle Malkin dumb.
Uh Jonah Goldberg.
You know, he's exactly like Obama.
And he just he wants to destroy personally his opponent.
Uh, you know, Meghan Kelly with her with her bloodiness.
Uh I'm scared to death for to have another president like that.
And I think if Trump asked Cruz to be his vice president because of Cruz's principles, he would turn it down.
Uh, you know, as a matter of fact, I think Trump actually voted for Obama in 2008.
You know, he was a registered Democrat for seven years prior to the election of Obama.
And in New York, Democrats voted for Obama 91% to 9%.
And in 2009, he hailed how great the people were that Obama surrounded himself with.
And he's supposed to be.
Now, wait, wait, hold it.
I I'm not going to deny that.
But he was by no means the only one.
I mean, half the Republican Party did too, if not more.
And when they picked Eric Holder to be the attorney general, I'm about puked as I listen to one Republican conservative intelligentsia member after another, praise the choice of Eric Holder.
And I had to hurry, I had to listen to nude praise, the choice of somebody to run the National Security Institute.
We were falling all over ourselves after the after the election.
This is very key.
The we're falling all over ourselves to praise the new young president and to make everybody understand that there's no racism here.
I'm not one.
I look at I love Obama.
My only point, maybe Trump might have done that.
He wasn't alone.
There were a lot of people on our side did it for purely personal calculating reasons.
We haven't had any principles of opposition to Obama since I can think of since he's since the campaign of 2008.
McCain didn't even run any opposition to Obama when you get right down to it, but we haven't had any since this campaign.
This is the first time it's been in.
Ted Cruz has since he got in.
And, you know, you didn't say that when he first got in, that he was a great person.
Trump says that he's got this great judgment, that he's just so smart.
That's not smart.
I'm just a lowly handyman out here trying to make a living, and I knew better than to vote for Obama in 2008.
Trump's this big billionaire, you know, smart guy, and I'm smarter than him.
Well, I don't know who Trump voted for.
And I do know that people have accused Trump of voting for Obama, have apologized for it.
Well, let me say this.
His proof that this weekend he said that he did not vote for Obama, and his proof of that is that he gave money to McCain and went out to eat with McCain and his wife in 2008 before the election.
Well, that doesn't mean anything because he also gave money to Harry Reed during the even during the Tea Party uprising time, he gave money to Harry Reed.
Nancy Pelosi, Chug Schumer, uh Anthony Wiener, and wait for it, wait for it.
Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Well I know, but everybody knows this, and they don't seem to care out there.
And I don't understand.
We have to have principles.
Trump he claims to be this hardliner on immigration.
You have to be consistent.
And in 2009, he was promoting how great the Dream Act was.
He says what he need he says what he thinks needs to be said to the right person, just like you were talking about Liberty University and how he Yeah, well, we got we've got those sound bites coming up, too.
You'll uh I've got a bunch of those just waiting.
In fact, now might be an opportune time since you have transitioned right into it.
So uh Braden, I appreciate the call.
Thank you much.
And we'll take a break and be right back.
Okay, let's start with Soundbite 30.
Trump is at Liberty University today, and Fox News carried what about 75% of it.
Everybody did.
They bumped out in time for this program to say Trump finished right before this program started, too.
They all who have proper instincts know that if they're doing something around noon, except for Obama, you stop.
As this program's about to begin.
Trump did.
Here's what he said about the Bible and Christianity.
Well, this is not the Christianity uh quote.
This is just the Bible quote at Liberty University this morning.
I wrote the art of the deal.
I wrote many best sellers like the art of the deal.
Everybody read the art who has read the art of the deal in this Trump.
Everybody.
I always say, I always say a deep, deep second to the Bible.
The Bible is the best, the Bible.
The Bible blows it away.
That's nothing like that.
But the art of the deal was about, in fact, there are a few of them right over there.
But the art of the deal was the best-selling business book.
And Obama didn't read it and Kerry didn't read it.
But we can do things with a country that will be so good.
But I've always used that word incompetent.
They're incompetent.
Now I I don't care anymore.
I don't care.
So it's pure improv.
Uh I I asked some devout Christians earlier, is it bother you when Trump says the Bible blows it away?
Oh no, that doesn't matter.
I said, doesn't?
And doesn't it sound disrespectful?
So the Bible kills it, the Bible is the best, the Bible blows it away.
There's nothing.
No, no, he's right.
Okay.
So I wouldn't be surprised if people say, I don't like talking about the Bible.
You don't say the Bible blows it away.
You don't say the Bible kills it.
You know.
And see, I think, you know, putting his book second.
Uh his audience eats that up.
They're not out there offended, and how dare he?
And yet, people that don't get this connection, this bond, think, oh my God, this is outrageous.
Who could dare compare their book to the Bible?
Nobody would ever like David Brooks and that crowd said that goes.
Oh my God, this is horrible.
Give us somebody in a gray suit and a red tie.
Give us somebody boring and dull.
Oh, this is scaring us, is what they say.
Now we have other bites from Trump at Liberty University today.
Let's just start with the first one in order.
Here we go.
I see it on television.
These generals, they get up and they talk on television.
They're being interviewed.
I don't want generals to be interviewed.
One of the generals just recently.
Well, what do you think of the ISIS threat?
And oh, they're very tough.
They're very well, can we beat them?
Well, it's gonna take a long time.
I don't want that kind of a general.
I want a general where we knock the hell out of him.
Fast.
That applause went on and on and on.
We edited it here for uh purposes of time.
But look at I've I have I have to say I agree with this.
I'm not crazy about all these retired generals going on TV, second guessing everybody and so forth.
Something about it is always made me nervous.
I think what's become of TV news makes me nervous anyway.
Because so much of it is this isn't news.
Some of them are good.
I mean, don't misunderstand it.
Just you ever see a Supreme Court justice on TV.
You never do.
Even the retired ones, you do not see them.
You do not.
It would cheapen what they do.
Can you imagine when his term is over, Anton and Scalia going on TV and analyzing the court after he's gone?
You wouldn't see it.
You would never ever see it.
And as such, the court doesn't end up being cheapened.
It's it's I understand First Amendment, everybody can speak and need the need for programming and to fill time.
Um think he's got a point there.
This uh this is the silent majority riff that has now become part of the routine.
The press is very dishonest, like the camera trick.
I call it the camera trick where they don't show.
So what's happening and what's happening in the country is you're not getting a real picture of the silent majority, which Jerry Sr. had something to do.
And that's a phrase you should be really cognizant of.
Because it is a silent majority, but I think I'm gonna up it a little bit because it's no longer so silent.
It's really a noisy majority.
It's become a noisy majority.
People want to see greatness for our country.
They want to see things happen.
They want to see things happen, and they're not seeing it.
And the wall time is let's say right right.
Now here's the wall, and uh Trump's doubled down on this too.
Who's gonna build the wall?
Mexico.
Everybody knows.
I say that again.
They say, oh, you can't build a wall.
So so easy, you have no idea.
And the reason it's easy, and it is for me.
It's I just built a 92-story building.
I mean, when you build buildings, building a wall, it's called like give me some prefab plank thing, and I gotta make it, but I really but I really I have to make it look beautiful.
Why?
Because someday they'll name the wall Trump Wall.
And I gotta have it.
They won't name it Trump Wall, he will.
It'll be named President Donald J. Trump Wall.
And illegal immigrant complex or or some such thing.
And then, if of course, now and then, ladies and gentlemen, just to confuse everybody, he throws me in.
I started talking about illegal immigration.
And boy did I take it.
For two weeks, Rush Lembo said the most incoming he's ever seen a human being take.
But I didn't give up because you can never give up.
One of the things I do when I speak about success, and a lot of people ask me to speak about success, where just great.
I love speaking about because I can help people.
One of the things I say, you gotta love what you do, but you can never, this applies to so many young, incredible people in this room, you can never ever give up.
You can never give up.
If you give up, you're not gonna make it.
So I took a lot of incoming, as Rush said, who's a great one?
I gotta go to the break, be right back in one big exciting busy broadcast hour remains on a day many people.
The unimportant ones take the day off.
▲
Export Selection