All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:18
December 16, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right.
99.8% at a time.
Just a great privilege to be with you every day and have you here.
Appreciate it more than you know.
Telephone number 800 282882, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
The first caller should get a gold star.
This is exactly what I mean when I say a caller's job make the host look good.
This guy has lit a fire under me.
Because this guy said something that I know a lot of when I watch a debate.
I know a lot of people are probably thinking it.
Boy, this guy Trump is just, he's not very deep.
You know, it just nuclear triangle what that is.
He's answering these questions off on tangent.
This guy, I don't know.
I don't know how smart this guy really is.
It's not that you're saying, I don't think he's smart.
I don't know what this guy knows.
This guy must not really know very much.
I know a lot of people are having that reaction to Trump.
And even among those who aren't, the question still is what explains Trump.
Everybody's running around trying to explain it.
Now, I just did in the first hour of the program, and I will do it again in mere moments, but I want to add to it here.
Because that guy's call illustrated something for me that is really important and ever so true, even on the Republican side of the aisle.
The question today and going forward is not what explains Trump.
The question is not how do we understand Trump?
Just who is this guy?
Why is Trump succeeding?
Why can't Trump be taken out?
Why do people who support Trump not leave him?
That's not the question.
It's a wrong question.
It's the question posed every day by who?
The establishment and the media.
Real question is, what's with them?
How do you explain them?
If anything needs to be explained, it's the Washington establishment and particularly the Republican establishment.
If anything needs to be understood, if there need to be questions asked, and if some of us need to get answers on anything, it's that question.
What is with them?
The evidence is all around us, and it's what Trump has tapped into.
The policies being implemented in Washington are destroying this country.
They are destroying this country's economy and its future, destroying this nation's health care system, making a mockery of our immigration law, and in fact making a mockery of the rule of law in a broad-based sense as well.
Overregulation, taxes, health care entitlements, out of control, irresponsible spending.
We don't have the money for any that we're doing right now.
Immigration, national security.
The ruling class establishment is engaging in behavior that demands explanation.
The things that they are doing defy common sense.
There is no reason for the borders of this country to be as wide open as they are, and everybody welcomed as though we are obligated to take them.
The rulings the ruling class establishment attacks on mainstream people in this country need to be explained.
There is a palpable fear all over this country.
People who have lost their jobs are afraid they won't find one.
People who have jobs are afraid they're going to lose theirs.
People who have savings are worried it isn't going to last.
Or it's going to be erased or taken away.
There is a palpable fear.
Militant Islamic terrorists seem to be able to kill at will.
And when it happens, the ruling class seeks to point fingers at people who are the actual victims.
And they want to find evidence of racism and bigotry.
Then they want to discuss the niceties of beating the bad guys.
And to tell us how we can't do that and do it, we can't do that and do it.
We can't do this and do it.
And people are confused because it makes no sense.
There's no common sense in what's coming out of Washington to do.
The question is not what's wrong with Trump.
Not what's wrong with crews, not what's wrong with it.
The question's what's wrong with the people currently leading the country.
Why do not they see what the rest of us see?
And if they do, if they do see what we see, then why do they permit this to continue to happen?
Why do they fund it?
Why do they support it?
Why are they taking us down a path that is endangering this country as founded?
Why are they doing it?
That's the question.
And why will they not answer those questions?
So I don't think the issue here, it may be for you in the context of the Republican presidential race, but overall, in terms of problems that we face, questions that we have, the issues not understanding Trump, which is easy.
I just explained Trump to you, and I'll do it over and over again.
It's not hard to understand why Trump's doing what he's doing and why it's working.
He speaks plainly.
He's straightforward.
He's not politically correct.
He refuses, he refuses to accept the terms mandated by the establishment and the ruling condition uh ruling class, the conditions they put on everything.
Trump's not destroying anything.
Trump hasn't cost anybody their job.
Trump, quite the contrary.
Trump's not taking papal's health care away from them and making it more distant and unaffordable.
Trump is not implementing policies that place American citizens at risk to acts of terror and crime in their cities and towns and communities.
That's all on the establishment, the ruling class.
What do you want to call them?
So the public's not hanging on every word that Trump utters.
The public is not micromanaging and looking for mistakes or errors.
The public is not playing gotcha.
The country's not trying to find evidence to laugh at Trump and put him down.
That's the ruling class doing that.
And every time they do it, every time they try to play it that way, all they do is cement and solidify Trump's support and the support of anybody else they target.
What you see is that these supposed wise and intellectual and brilliant ruling class types have given us a massive debt, endless illegal immigration.
They create problem after problem after problem, and then they claim they're the only ones with the solution.
And the solution makes the problem worse.
The solution actually codifies and cements the problem and justifies it.
Now it used to be that all of this that I was saying used to apply primarily to the Democrats.
The great sobering reality is that you have to include some Republicans in this diatribe now.
Because there are plenty of Republicans of the ruling class who are joining forces with the powers that be who are demanding all of these policies.
We endless immigration, we have a dismal economy and 94 million Americans not working for crying out loud.
We got more people on welfare and federal benefits than ever before in our lives.
We got more food stamps.
We're creating we're destroying people's lives.
We're destroying human dignity.
We're taking away from them the opportunity to be the best they can be before they even have a chance to understand what's happening to them.
We have attacks on the family by redefining marriage and then calling people bigoted who have deeply held religious beliefs that were present at the founding of the country.
Those people are the new bigots and racists.
We've turned the U.S. military into a social architecture playground for the Democrats and the Libs.
Every day brings new race baiting.
Hands up, don't shoot.
Don't make me repeat what blew me up yesterday.
Yeah, the Washington Post.
You know what?
Hands up, don't shoot.
That was where four Pinocchios.
That's one of the biggest lies all year.
Really?
Who made that happen?
Who made that?
The very people handing out the Pinocchios.
Now about Trump's lack of intellect.
You know, there's somebody else they accused of being a dunce.
And that would be Ronaldus Magnus.
Ronaldus Magnus was tarred and feathered as being too simple, simplistic, and amiable, dunce, a nice guy, didn't have the brain power to stay engaged on anything longer than ten minutes, and then it was off for a nap.
Reagan's reply was, there aren't any easy answers, but there are simple answers.
And you see, when we're talking about the intellectual elite and the ruling class, understand one thing.
The more complex, the better, as far as they're concerned.
Because the more complex, the harder it is for you to understand something, the greater the divide between them and you.
The more complex, the harder it is for you to understand it, the more complex, the more necessary they are to explain it and deal with it.
Because they have the deep intellect to get it.
The more complex the better.
But the fact of the matter is, as Ronaldus Magnus said, yep, no easy answers, but there are simple answers.
We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.
Well, I would submit to you that a lot of people see Trump that way.
They're not worried about the niceties and the intellect and all that.
They understand that the problems are deep.
And here's a guy talking about his desire to fix them and solve them, and he has a track record of doing that.
Reagan would cut through all the academic debating, present the simple answers.
And the intellectual elite do not like simplicity.
They're not needed for that.
And you know, oftentimes they don't even get it.
Yeah, the simplicity is too beneath them.
Folks, we have just had, and we are still in the middle of seven years of somebody that the drive-by media in the Democrat Party think is the smartest president we've had in generations.
Barack Hussein, oh.
Oh man, is he smart?
Does he use language?
Oh, does this guy know how to speak?
This guy's so brilliant.
It's dripping off of him.
Harvard Law, law review, except we've never seen the transcripts.
Never mind.
What good has all of that brain power done us?
That is why I've always maintained that we have the need to redefine smart here.
But here's another reality.
For all of you trying to understand Trump, understand that today, the ruling class is aiming all of its fire at Ted Cruz.
Now, part of the reason the ruling class establishment's backing Rubio, and they are Rubio is assumed the position that Jeb occupied.
The ruling class, nobody's admitting it yet, but they understand that Jeb's not going to pull this off.
They need a stand-in, and for them, in their mind, it's uh it's Rubio.
And they're pushing for Rubio to try to take out Cruz.
Rubio's the new stalking horse.
I mean, they were hoping that Kasich could do this too.
I still go back to last night.
Kasich opening up by saying, yeah, my daughter said, Dad, you know what I don't like about politics?
There's too much yelling, there's too much screaming, there's too much disagreeing, there's too many arguments that go on.
This is from the guy who pledged his super pack to take down Trump.
Remember that?
So there's a lot of hypocrisy out there that people also note.
So the big Rhino donors are going to move to Rubio.
They're going to put tons of money in his pack, gonna run a lot of ads suggesting Cruz is anti-Israel, anti-military, pro-amnesty.
But there isn't any amount of pack money that's going to convince people that Ted Cruz is pro-amnesty, but they're going to try.
You know, folks.
Here's a point.
They're never going to be able to make the case that Ted Cruz is pro-amn of all the people in the world that would be trying to make the case that Trump is.
And yet they're going to try with all of this money.
As many of us suspected, you're going to think this is a big subject off a move off the subject, but it isn't.
When they closed the LA school system yesterday, there were a lot of people, and I was one of them who thought, wait, this these people are overreacting.
They got scared.
This is going to be a hoax.
You wait.
It's a bunch of people that have been just totally shackled by PC.
We're living in the shadows of the San Bernardino Massacre just to the east of L.A., And it turned out to be a hoax.
And you know how they finally figured out it was a hoax, and this is very important.
The hoax came from Germany.
It was an email.
It turns out that the hoax, hoaxer, was using the storyline from this season's series Homeland.
This season's episodes of Homeland was his inspiration.
But you know how they knew, ultimately, that the email was a hoax?
There was no capital A on Allah.
Now wait, wait a minute.
What does that mean?
It means that he could not have been a true Muslim.
He could not have been a true Islamic Muslim terrorist, because he didn't have the sense to capitalize Allah.
Well, folks, I'm sorry.
They have just admitted with this explanation that it is indeed devout Muslims from where militant Islamic terrorism comes from.
They've just, whether they know it or not, they just admitted Obama's out there saying that there can't be any terrorism in Islam because Islam's a religion of peace, and that Islam opposes ISIS, Islam opposes all this terrorism, they oppose it as much as we do, and yet the experts in Islamic terrorism were able to proclaim this email a hoax because Allah was not capitalized, which meant it wasn't from a true Muslim.
But wait, these very same people tell us that, no, no, no, you've got to, you can't, No, there's no terrorism in Islam.
They have just exposed themselves.
Now, for whatever reason they're lying to us, but it's another example, the ruling class trying to tell us that what we know isn't so, telling us that what's right in front of our face that we can see isn't what we see.
Militant Islamic terrorism is militant Islamic terrorism.
I'm trying to tell us it isn't because there's no such thing as terrorism in Islam.
Except they knew it was a hoax because the emailer forgot to capitalize Allah, which meant that he wasn't a genuine devout Muslim.
Okay.
There was even more to this, but I recognize that I have got to take a break here.
We'll do that and get back with more after this.
And by the way, if Hillary Clinton is an example of deep intellect and intelligence, then spare me.
As I don't want any part of it.
I think this whole argument about intellectualism and depth and who's smart and who's not.
It's idiotic.
Take a ruling class establishment want nothing to do with two of the smartest people in our country today.
Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.
Trump, enormously successful businessman, well-liked, generous, very popular.
Ted Cruz, the smartest man in the United States Senate, the smartest man maybe in the Republican Party, and the ruling class of Washington wants nothing to do with either of them.
So the question to me is what's with them.
Why are they so exclusionary?
And of who?
I mean, they're trying to destroy these two people.
They must feel really threatened.
Meanwhile, you don't hear of anybody going after Hillary or Obama the way they Go after these two.
And these are the questions people are asking out there.
People in this country are trying to understand why Washington's doing what it's doing, why Washington supports the people it supports issues and on and on.
Here's uh here's John Sue City, Iowa.
John, great to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
Hello, Rush.
Thank you for taking my call.
Um I understand where the previous callers coming from, but here's the deal.
We need somebody in office who loves the United States of America and who will support and defend the constitutional republic for which it represents, number one.
And I've listened to Trump a lot on his rallies and things like that, and the man's a builder.
He builds things just like he says in his rallies.
He's a concrete thinker, he's a nuts and bolts kind of guys.
And excuse me, and uh when he wants a building built, he knows what he wants, when he wants it, and how he wants it and why he wants it, but he has a whole multitude, a whole team of surveyors, engineers, and architects and draftsmen that actually put you know that puts the thing together.
You could liken that to him being the president of the United States.
He'll have a whole uh cabinet of the this is the point.
What why is it that the only brainiacs don't hang up out there, John?
Why the people that the establishment hires to do this building are making a mess of everything.
Why are we supposed to respect that?
Okay, back here with John in Sioux City, Iowa.
I uh Sir, I took that call.
I thought I had one more minute than I misread the clock, so I'm sorry I had to interrupt you, but finish your point.
It's a privilege to be on your show.
Thank you.
You bet.
Um I was just saying that that one of the problems that people are having with understanding Trump is that I think as a nation over the years that we have been conditioned and trained with an expectation of what a politician or more to the point uh an established politician should sound like.
Okay.
Trump is a straight talker, he's a straight dealer, he gets things done, like you said, look at his track record, and uh that's exactly what we need.
And just like Trump says, we need good, tough, smart people running the country.
And the original point I wanted to make when I called was uh just real quick, and then I let you go.
Uh Trump may have already come up unwittingly with the strategy to get the Muslim population to help us with the Islamic terrorists, and that's with the band.
And how would that be?
That would be an incentive for them to help us out.
If we're going to put a band on any Muslims coming to this country for for a temporary time, what better way to incentivize those people?
Well, it's interesting.
It's interesting you you you bring that up, John, because right here at the next item at the top of my stack.
This is not in the debate stack.
Couldn't be though.
New York Times.
Look at of all places.
Now, this is a strange story because it's it's atypical of the times or untypical.
How unpopular is Trump's Muslim ban?
Depends on who you ask, is the headline.
Now, in one sense, this makes my point.
Everybody's asking the quote, well, what how unpopular is Trump's Muslim ban?
They don't ask any questions like this of people who are actually implementing policies that are putting our country at risk.
Here we have a candidate who's run around and made a proposal that it's rooted in common sense and has precedent, previous precedents in this country's history.
But this is a surprising article.
Because it first acknowledges the possible existence of the Trump effect.
We posited last week.
This article, the Trump effect is that his support in the polls is understated.
That there are actually more people in favor of Trump than say so.
Depending on the poll and how it's taken.
If the poll is a personal interview or a phone call, and it's not a robot on the other end, it's an actual human being because of the drive-by media and the public impression of Trump, a lot of people to support him may not admit it.
So they don't want to get grief or they don't want to, they don't want the pollster to think they're an idiot.
So they don't say Trump when they when they support Trump.
The New York Times is acknowledging that this is a valid question to ask in assessing Trump's strength right now.
And the story ends by saying it's impossible to look at all of these polls and figure out how the public really feels about Trump's ban.
That is an amazing admission from the New York Times.
You would expect the New York Times to run a story claiming that the vast majority of reasonable Americans oppose this, it's deadly, it's dangerous, it's bigoted, it's racist, and they're holding out the possibility that it's more popular than any of us, meaning them and the establishment media are aware.
But it still goes to the point that they're still asking the how unpopular is Trump's ban.
Now, I understand it's it's a it's a unique proposal, nobody else has made it, therefore it's makes sense questions would be asked, but again, I don't think the question today properly is what what explains Trump.
Trump's not doing anything.
The question is what explains Washington today?
What explains what is happening there and what's coming out of there?
What explains Obama?
What the hell is it that explains if anything needs explaining it's Barack Obama and what he's doing and wants to do.
And I happen to believe that a majority of the American people think that are asking that very question, and they think they know the answer in many cases, and they don't like it.
But you look, ruling class here, they are dead set against two of the smartest Americans having anything to do with the American political system, Trump and Cruz.
Now, John and Sue City, there is one thing I've said it before.
It bears repeating.
He made the point here that we have been conditioned to accept a certain personality type and a certain resume as the qualifications to be a successful politician.
And he is right.
However, it must be noted that politics is its own enterprise in business, and as such, it does have its own rules, requirements for climbing the ladder of success in that business.
And like a lot of other businesses, it is an insider-based business.
People in sports media, I can tell you this person, people in sports media do not want somebody from political world coming in and doing their jobs.
They're looked on as outsiders and they're not welcome, and they'll do everything they can to get rid of them.
And a lot of businesses that way, economists do not want anybody other than trained, ordained economists who know the language endeavoring to explain it.
No outsiders welcome.
So it's not just politics that's exclusionary to disillusion.
The difference here is that politics and Washington is about how we manage our affairs.
It's about maintaining and growing the greatness of the United States.
It's not a separate business in and unto itself, which it's been converted into now.
The problem really is, I think that those in the political business have decided to make it a business that's oriented toward their personal enrichment, their personal acquisition of power, and maintaining that power.
And the idea that they are there to do something like defend protect the Constitution, defend and protect the country, yeah, but secondary.
The primary purpose of politics now is to glorify those in it.
And maybe it always has been to a certain extent, but it really seems more of an exclusive insider, no outsider's welcome type of enterprise than it has ever been.
And yet, it seeks and demands the American people thinking they're part of it in order for it to succeed.
So a giant game is being played.
The American people during campaigns are told how important they are.
And then after the election's over, the American people go back to becoming irrelevant again.
And Dunces and Know Nothings.
And worse.
To the audio sound bites.
This isn't just Patty Solis Doyle.
Patty Celise Doyle is a former Hillary Clinton campaign manager.
She was on CNN this afternoon.
Legal View is the name of the show.
It's hosted by Ashley Banfield.
Who said of Patty Celeste Doyle, she asked her question I've uh heard rumors that there were back room meetings between Trump and Cruz staffers in Las Vegas.
Now, given the fact that we didn't really see them go after each other last night, it uh it gave some credence to those rumors that there was a private powwow between Cruz and Trump people.
Is that what happens at these debates, Patty?
You've worked for Hillary, you would know this.
Do they regularly get together, really get together, discuss in advance before debate, how they're gonna treat each other?
The two big winners of last night debate, in my opinion, were Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.
Basically, because the dynamic of this race was not changed uh after this debate.
Ted Cruz has the momentum, and he wasn't gonna sacrifice that momentum by going after Trump and alienating those voters.
Donald Trump is in the lead by a large margin, and he wasn't gonna sacrifice that lead by alienating Ted Cruz voters.
He tried doing that just prior to the debate, and Rush Limbaugh, you know, gave him a severe warning to stop, and Donald Trump did.
So I think uh both of them wanted to keep their momentum going into the sprint in January.
So she's essentially saying that there might have been some truth to the fact that there was a powwow between these two camps, and that there was a mutually agreed hands-off.
She doesn't know it, she just could well be because you saw that uh the gloves came off between these two.
And then I want to remind you of this.
Grab audio soundbite number one.
This is a replay of me yesterday on the program predicting to you what of many things are gonna happen last night.
I think what you want to look for tonight is Cruz versus Rubio.
If you want to look at it in versus terms, but we're getting to the point now.
You know, the idea that Trump's gonna implode or destroy himself, quit or whatever, that's long gone now.
So the responsible people that look at this and treat reality as it is are gonna have to come to grips with the fact that Trump is number one, and he's not going anywhere right now.
So what's next?
What's available next?
What's available next is number two.
And the battle for number two right now is Cruz and Rubio, and Rubio has a lot on the line tonight.
And so does Cruz.
And listen to how the drive by is analyzed it after the debate last night.
We have a little montage here.
We saw Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz battle back and forth.
Fight night in Vegas.
Cruz and Rubio.
There were a lot of interesting exchanges.
Cruz versus Rubio became the main event.
The sharp exchanges between Ted Cruz versus Marco Rubio.
The two senators who sparred Rubio and Cruz.
Marco Rubio took several shots at Ted Cruz.
There was Rubio versus Cruz.
Cruz versus Rubio.
Marco Rubio versus Ted Cruz.
The debate between Rubio and Cruz was a really good one.
Cruz and Rubio going after each other.
Rubio and Cruz, they were arguing with one another.
Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, that battle between the two of them is really the battle for the heart of the Republican Party.
Oh, did you hear that?
That was Brett Beer, Fox News.
Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, that battle is the battle for the heart of the Republican Party.
Meaning, Trump don't talk to us about Trump.
Come on.
But anyway, just more evidence when I say don't doubt me.
Don't talent on loan from God.
Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Highly trained broadcast specialist talent on display, 800 282-288-2 to Mansfield, Ohio, and Tim.
Hello, sir.
You're up next.
Hey, Rush.
Hey!
Quite an adrenaline rush, so to speak.
This is great.
Anyway.
I appreciate that, sir.
You had a caller the other day, uh, might have been yesterday, who uh said that you're a Trump advisor.
And uh after watching the debate last night, I've come to agree with him.
Um I heard Donald Trump say something about Dr. Carson, which I've heard you say numerous of times.
And that is, he said, what uh he he said he believes Dr. Carson is one of the most decent men in America.
And Rush, you say that all the time.
Well, I have said that I can't deny that.
I have I have described because he is.
He's one of the most decent honorable upstanding people, citizens this country has ever had.
He's just it it is it's a great man in his own regard.
Yeah, I have said that.
No question about it.
Yeah, there's further further evidence of that, Rush.
Also, he rolled over for Cruz last night.
You said, you know, you better back off Cruz.
And he did.
And and here's my thought.
I believe you want Trump to be president because you and him are friends, and so you're gonna be basically in the White House, and hey, why not?
Great strategy, Rush.
You think that that's how I make up my mind on things.
Well, I mean, I think you would you would take Cruz, because he's a great conservative.
Um, but you know, Trump's your man.
You guys are both number one.
You're both the best at what you do.
Well and your pals.
I don't have a I don't I honestly don't have a man right now.
That's too, it's still way too soon.
There's way too much that can happen.
But I'm I'm flattered nevertheless uh that that you you what did you say that I uh about me being in the White House?
Well, I mean, you'd be connected.
You and Trump are pals.
Because I was gonna say my house is nicer than the White House.
I'm not sure I yeah.
Would want to go now.
Yeah.
I've been both places, and and White House can be I mean, it would be an honor.
It is an honor every time you're there.
No question about it.
I'll take my library any day.
It's got a smoke eater system in it.
The White House is you gotta go out in the Truman balcony to have a cigar.
Anyway, uh not not trying to avoid your point.
Let me uh he he let me let me Tim let me ask you.
When you say, what exactly do you mean when you say when you accuse me, or when you not accused, but when you suggest I'm a Trump advisor, what do you actually say?
Well, I believe that um Trump's holding you in high regard, and I believe that when you talk to us, your audience on the air, I believe he listened, and I believe he takes what you say to heart.
And so you're not directly advising him.
All right, indirectly.
Okay, I just want to make that clear.
I want to make the because he says that I'm a Trump advisor, and if I don't deal with that, people are gonna think, yeah, yeah, well, she didn't say anything about it.
I'm not advising anybody.
I mean, I do on the on the radio, but I nobody's seeking it.
Ted Cruz invite me to White House, right?
Uh but here's what he's talking about, folks.
We just happened to have it's amazing coincidence here.
We just happened to have the soundbite of the moment he was talking about last night in the debate, Dana Bash of CNN.
Mr. Trump just this weekend, you said that Senator Cruz is not qualified to be president because he does have a right temperament.
He acted like a maniac when he arrived in the Senate and the way he deals with people there.
Well, last month you said that you were open to naming Senator Cruz as your running mate.
I did.
So why would you be willing to put somebody who's a maniac, one heart beat elevator?
He has a wonderful temperament.
He's just fine.
Don't worry about it.
Okay.
That is what old Tim from Mansfield, Ohio is referring to.
And then the next up is Ted Cruz and Trump have this exchange spawned by do we have time here?
We do, Dana Bash.
Senator Cruz, you have not been willing to attack Mr. Trump in public, but you did question his judgment in having control of America's nuclear arsenal during a private meeting with supporters.
Why are you willing to say things about him in private and not in public?
Dana, what I said in private is exactly what I'll say here, which is that the judgment that every voter is making of every one of us up here is who has the experience, who has the vision, who has the judgment to be commander-in-chief.
That is a judgment for every voter to make.
What I can tell you is all nine of the people here would make an infinitely better commander-in-chief than Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.
Okay, and we gotta go.
We have to take a break.
Be right back.
Don't go away here, folks.
You know, folks, I I indirectly advise millions of people every day on this program.
I simply, you know, I can't I can't help it.
I mean, even if Hillary wins, God forbid, I'm to be living rent free in her head, and her husband's the whole time they're there.
▲
Export Selection