All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 9, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:02
December 9, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You are listening to the most listened to radio talk show in America, the Rush Limbaugh program, and now into our 28th year.
We have survived all efforts of the Democrat Party, numerous presidents, numerous senators, and a drive-by media, all of whom have targeted this program and me for destruction, and we are here still dominating.
It's great to have you here, as it always is.
The telephone number, if you want to be on the program is 800 282-2882, the email address, Ilrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Just had a new survey released.
This is uh survey, is it Survey USA, it's an automated poll.
Yeah, Survey USA, which is an automated polling firm that claims to have scientific results, and they are reported frequently.
They're not an oddball outlier poll.
They're part of the mainstream group of polls that uh many drive-by's report.
Oh, oh, one thing I've got to remind you something here, folks.
The Jimmy Carter stuff that I just told you about.
All of these statements that Jimmy Carter made were made in public, and all of these uh the announcements that he made that he was going to send Iranians home, Iranian students home, that they had to report to immigration, they had to confirm they were here legally, those who weren't were sent back.
They would have put a moratorium on all Iranians being allowed in the country back in 1979.
Carter did that publicly.
He announced it in public and he announced it proudly.
Cookie has been scouring our archives and all of the other archives that are out there to try to find Carter Audio, but she can't.
And the reason is the networks are not digging it up and playing it for anybody.
The networks have it, is the point.
There is video of Jimmy Carter making these announcements.
ABC, CBS, NBC, the odds are have video of Jimmy Carter, just as they do of Reagan and Nixon and all the way back to Kennedy when television started, they've got it.
They're just not interested in finding it.
They're not interested in dredging it up and playing it for anybody.
But it was made.
These are not proclamations on a Friday night document dump where nobody was paying attention.
Carter proudly announced these maneuvers in public.
And the drive-bys, if they were doing their jobs, would be digging into their archives trying to find this.
But it's not in their interests.
Because right now, they're all trying to say that what Trump has proposed is unconstitutional.
It's ugly.
What Trump wants to do is dangerously ugly.
It ignores the law, it ignores the Constitution, and it feeds into our worst impulses.
It feeds into the worst aspects of who we are.
Just ugly.
In fact, it's not.
It's been used before.
It's been United States law since 1952.
And we get back to that here in just a second.
Another salient point to make about that, but I want to tell you about Survey USA.
They just completed, listen to this.
They just completed two surveys in cities near San Bernardino.
Their focus was on Trump's declaration that the United States should block any Muslims from entering the country.
In both of these cities, near San Bernardino, the majority of adults polled supported Trump's proposal.
In fact, more than a third of adults in both of these cities strongly agreed with the idea that Muslims should be barred from entering the country.
In both cities, more people strongly agreed with the idea than strongly disagreed.
But you combine the the uh strongly agree and somewhat agree, you combine that and you well into a majority of people who agree with Trump on this.
There was a partisan split, as you might expect, but even among Democrats, more than a quarter of them answering the poll strongly agreed with Trump's idea.
When have 25% of Democrats Agreed with any Republican idea.
Can you recall?
When have 25% of adults ever agreed with Democrats agreed with any Republican proposal?
The Washington Post is the source for this.
The Washington Post reports the results of Survey USA's data.
And the Washington Post notes that both of these towns heavily voted Obama in 2008 and 2012.
And a majority clearly now agree with Trump.
So here again, 18 or number eight United States Code, inadmissible aliens.
Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president.
Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may, by proclamation, meaning he doesn't have to go back and get a new vote.
He can just and this law empowers him to stand up and do what Jimmy Carter did.
He may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, until next week, until next year, until whenever he wants, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Now, apparently our armchair constitutional scholars inside the beltway think that United States code must be unconstitutional.
Because they're running around saying it'd be unconstitutional what Trump is saying.
Ridiculous.
You can't even be horrible.
That's right there in the United States statutory law.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1992, written and passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed into law by a Democrat president.
Trump's proposal is legal because all of our immigration laws have always barred some groups of people based on their actions or ethnicity or nationality.
The very first U.S. immigration law was the Chinese Exclusionary Act of 1882.
Then there was the Anarchist Exclusion Act of 1903, which we have discussed on this program.
But this has reminded me of something.
A couple of weeks ago, Obama went on TV, as he is wont to do, and said, we do not have the religious test, but people in our country, it doesn't matter what they believe.
We have freedom of religion in this country as in the whatever amendments it's in.
And it's a law.
It's our law.
And we cannot ask people about their religion, and we certainly cannot use what they say is the reason to keep.
And I was forced to remind everybody that not only can we, we must, because it is also American statutory law.
We must ask emigrants seeking asylum what their religious beliefs are.
We have done it.
We continue to do it.
Here's why.
The primary reason most refugees give for seeking asylum is that they're fleeing religious persecution in whatever war-torn place they're coming from.
During the interview process, it is required that we investigate that.
What religion are you?
We ask.
They must tell us.
Based on what they tell us, we then examine whether or not there is indeed persecution of that religious belief in the place where the immigrant, the refugees coming from.
We dealt with this a couple of weeks ago.
Obama said you could never have a religious test for refugees, and we showed that a religious test is actually written into the statutes that govern refugees and asylum.
You know, the thing is here, folks, whether we're talking about the hard left or the progressive left or these rhino type Republicans and the and the commentariat.
You know, these people are actually making up a new constitution and body of law as they go along based on how they feel.
So Trump comes along.
They do not know about this law in 1950.
They obviously don't know it, or they wouldn't be making fools of themselves saying what they're saying.
They don't know the law exists.
Trump proposes that we put a moratorium on Muslims entering the country.
And they just have a conniption fit.
And they talk about how it's violating the Constitution, and it makes a mockery of our system, and it makes a mockery of our values, and this is not who we are.
And they're just telling us how they feel, but they are certainly not knowledgeable of the Constitution.
They're making it up.
Tom Brokaw is one of many out there claiming what Trump wants to do is unconstitutional.
It's in violation of United States law.
It would never stand up in court.
He doesn't know what he's talking about, but he certainly is letting us know how he feels about it and making up his own law and his own constitution as he goes, as they are all doing.
So as a result, the last thing that they want anybody to do is actually look at what the law of the United States is.
And they certainly don't want us looking at the history of this country because they certainly do not want us finding any precedent for anything.
In this case, Trump has suggested.
So now we have the soap opera, the daily soap opera, that is the narrative of the day written by the media in Washington.
And we've got the same thing about history.
We have the daily narrative, the daily soap opera skip script about what U.S. history is and what it isn't.
Every one of these people that are denouncing Trump are living in fantasy land.
And they're doing so with an out-of-control ego and superiority and supremacy about themselves, that they are untouchable intellectually.
They're smarter than any of us.
They know we don't.
They are clueless about what they're talking about, and they are paraded before us as the opinion leaders we should know, believe, love, and trust.
This is why, again, my friends, Rush Revere, Time Travel Adventures with Exceptional Americans.
Truth of the American Founding, Truthful American history written for eight to eleven-year-olds.
Book four just out in October, Rush Revere to Star Spangled Banner.
This is among the many reasons why that whole project exists and why we've taken it on.
Why we're so grateful it's doing so well.
Anyway, let me take a break.
Oh, wait, there's one thing.
Just one thing.
Are you aware?
Let me find this.
Are you aware that the San Bernardino II have a child?
There is a baby, right?
Okay, now stick with me on this because this is very, very, very important.
The San Diego II have this baby.
And the Council on Arab or American Islamic relations is demanding that the baby be placed with a Muslim family.
Well, no, that's not the question.
Care is demanding a religious test for the child of the San Bernardino II.
The baby orphaned by terrorists is not the center of a custody battle.
The attorney for care, representing the family, said that its priority is to ensure that the baby is placed with a Muslim foster family.
Why does it matter?
Obama said the parents weren't Muslims.
Muslims do not engage In terrorism.
There is no such thing as Islamic extremism.
ISIS, they're not Muslims, that's not Islam.
They are perverting a great religion.
So why does it matter?
In fact, how can the baby be placed with a Muslim family when Obama said the parents were not Muslims by virtue of the way he explained and defined them?
Just asking, folks.
Just ask.
No, no, no, folks, seriously now.
The orphaned child, the orphan baby of the San Bernardino II, the San Bernardino II, were not Muslims.
They were radicalized.
Um Obama has told us the Democrat Party tell every tells us that that Islam is a religion of peace.
Therefore, wouldn't they rather place and these the kids' parents were terrorists?
Wouldn't you want to place the kid with an ISIS family or an al Qaeda family?
If you're going to be consistent here.
You know how the Olympics could get good again?
um Al Qaeda gets a team.
That's what's missing.
Oh, well, you have the Russians had a team.
The Soviets had a team back in the day.
Here's John.
Let's send to the phones, Toledo, Ohio.
Great to have you with us, John.
You're up first today on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello.
Rush, thank you very much.
Yes, sir.
Hey, my comment is uh on your opening dialogue on on why we listen to Rush.
And I am self-employed.
I've been self-employed for about 15 years now.
I work out of my residence, and I've got the pleasure of being able to listen to anything that I want to while I'm working.
And every day I look forward to turning on Rush.
And over the past seven years, I feel like I've developed this bunker mentality that I'm just fearful of everything that's going on around me in the in the in this political environment.
And it's like listening to Rush feels like back at World War II, where the Britons would pack around the radio and listen for transmissions that would give them some little credible piece of hope that something good or something of a good nature is happening around us.
And that's why I listen to Rush.
Wow, well, that is very that's deep.
I appreciate that.
I I uh I really do.
What he's taught, folks.
If John, excuse me just a second, if you just tuned in, I opened the program talking about this huge disconnect that's bigger than I've ever seen between people that govern us and rule us in Washington versus us out here.
They really have they don't have any idea who we are anymore.
They don't know what what what inspires us, what scares us, what warms our hearts.
They don't know anything about us.
They just they're they're too distant, and they don't care to know now.
All they do is is impugn, diminish, and relegate us to irrelevant status.
Uh and I made the point that here they are sitting there saying all this with their audiences of 80,000, 150,000, trying to shove us in some little shoebox out here when the audience of this program and others like it.
We're 12 million to 20 million people during the day or week here.
Um and it I just found it fascinating.
These people that nobody watches, nobody listens to claim the superiority mantle.
Uh and so John here is calling to explain uh what it is about this program that he finds enjoyable and inspiring and worthwhile.
I really appreciate that.
I I um I always am uh excited to learn why people listen.
I never take it for granted that I know why people do.
When I hear it, as you have expressed it, I've deeply appreciated.
Thank you for your comments.
I appreciate that.
Thank you, John.
All right, uh so he's self-employed, working at home.
Obviously, would we agree the man sounds extremely intelligent, accomplished?
He is obviously refined, sophisticated.
You can tell it by the way people speak.
I'm sure if I could see the crease in his slacks, I would have no doubt about his superior intelligence.
But you could just tell the way people sound.
And people like him, I'm telling you the the Halperins and these other people that listen and j and judge this program.
They don't think people like him would ever listen to this program.
They people listen to this program.
Um, I'm not, I'm not going to insult you by even characterizing the way they think of you.
I've already done that.
Let me move on.
Jim Winston, Salem, North Carolina.
Welcome, sir.
You're next.
Hello.
Rush, Merry Christmas.
Same to you.
I agree with you about 97% of the time, including your comments recently about conventional wisdom, which is, of course, an oxymoron and Hillary being an empty pantsuit.
But here's the big butt, although I do share your unbridled joy with Donald Trump raising issues that need to be raised and tweaking the left stream media.
The sad fact is Trump often sounds like a simplistic sixth grader.
And I just, you know, he's all he's almost as insufferable and arrogant as Barack Obama.
How did George W. Bush sound to you?
George W. Yeah, how did he sound to you?
Oh, uh erudite.
You know, right on.
And and and Donald Trump makes makes great points, but he when he gets into this, you're so bad and you're really stupid, and she's an idiot.
And rather than, you know, get grabbing your attention with his comment and then explaining more detail, he never gets into detail.
Tell me where I'm wrong.
No, no, no, I'm not telling you where you're wrong.
I'm not I that's an opinion.
I can't tell you wrong of it.
That's what you think of the way he sounds.
Uh, but I do want to comment on it.
I have to take a break here.
We will be back.
You see, Angela Merkel Time Magazine's person of the year.
Yeah, a woman single-handedly presiding over the destruction of her company, uh, country, is named Time Magazine's push person of the year.
Now, about the last caller.
I asked him what he thought of the way George W. Bush spoke for a reason.
A last caller thinks that Trump, he likes what Trump says now and then.
He likes way Trump's tweaking the left and tweaking the establishment and all that.
But Trump sounds like a schoolyard uh just average run of the mill.
Oh, maybe not bully, but there's this nothing aeriodite and uplifting and confidence inspiring about the way Trump talks, his voice.
So I asked him about George W. Bush, and he said, yeah, but George W. Bush is airy.
Folks, I have to tell you something.
In case you've forgotten.
The media, the American left, and everybody who hated Bush thought that he was dumb because of the way he spoke.
They acted like he was dumb, they made fun of the way he talked, they called him a cowboy and so forth.
He was anything but erudite, even though he is as, if not more educated than all of them.
But here is why I think it doesn't matter.
Even if people think that about Trump, and that's the first time I've heard anybody say that, I couldn't care less.
I'm I don't want you people get the wrong idea here.
I'm not here to defend anybody.
If this guy thinks Trump sounds like a buffoon, fine and dandy, but there's one thing here that's undeniable.
Again, over here, with everybody over on that side, and I don't care.
Republicans, Democrats, commentators, media people, media, they all sound brilliant, don't they?
They all sound very intelligent and uh thoughtful, uh well spoken.
They pause at just the right time to give you the indication in deep thoughts about what's coming next.
And they uh use uh several speech tricks uh to convey uh the idea that they're brilliant, such as mmm and uh sort of in deep thought before they submit to their next statement and so forth.
They're the people screwing everything up.
The people that seem the smartest are actually seem you telling me that David Brooks, New York Times columnist, who actually said the crease in Obama's slacks was all I needed to see to tell me he's gonna be a great president.
The people who make this country work are not caught up in all of this surface appearance stuff.
They're fed up with the mess.
The so-called best and brightest are making of this country.
They are seriously fed up.
And they are holding to account the people over there who everybody thinks are the most educated and the best most well spoken and so forth.
They are the ones that are screwing it all up.
So I don't think it matters to a lot of people the way Trump sounds.
It's what Trump is saying and the attitude that he conveys when he says it is attracting them.
But I've got a video you've got to watch.
I saw it last night.
And it will put what this last caller said, it'll illustrate it, in fact, in a funny way.
It's a seven minute video.
It's on YouTube, and it's called Darth Trump.
They'll search for it under Darth Trump.
And what it is, it's really, really brilliantly put together.
It is edited chunks of Star Wars movies.
Of Darth Vader.
Now you remember Darth Vader, James Earl Jones was his voice.
And even with that great set of pipes, James Earl Jones has, they still ran that through audio processing to make it sound even more eerie and authoritative.
And it was just perfect.
It just fit the character perfectly.
Well, what the guy, whoever did this video, Darth Trump.
You got Darth Vader killing people, running around giving orders, coming at various takes, various cuts, edits from Star Wars, with Trump as Darth Vader speaking.
It's actual sound bites of Trump, talking about what he's going to do to people, what he thinks about people.
And it's it's just it's hilarious.
It is literally hilarious.
It's called Darth Trump.
It's on YouTube, it's about seven minutes.
I've got the link here.
I'll send the link up to Coco here in just a minute.
He may find it before I have a chance to send it up there too, and we'll link to it at Rush Limbaugh.com.
It's it's hilarious.
I mean, you've got you got Darth Vader reviewing the troops for the evil emperor in one bite, and Trump's talking about what he's gonna do to the Mexicans as they're reviewing the troops.
It's just it's just and it will illustrate to you that Trump's voice is no Darth Vader voice, no James Earl Jones voice, nowhere near as authoritative or what have you.
Uh and of course, every starship has a Trump billboard on top of it if it's as it's flying through outer space.
Anyway, Snerdley's in there eagerly searching for it, as I'm sure many of you are just be patient.
I'll get the link up to Coco.
And we'll link to it there.
In the meantime, uh, who's next?
Where are we where are we headed next on the phones?
Give me a that would be Len in Grant Park, Illinois.
Your turn, you're next.
Hello, sir.
Well, hello there, Mr. Limbaugh.
I am humbled to speak to the greatest freedom fighter on earth.
Well, I don't know about that, but I appreciate you calling, and I'm glad you're out there, sir.
Well, I wanted to make a comment.
You know, everybody talks about, you know, Trump and why he's so popular and all this stuff.
And, you know, I remember back when Reagan got elected.
He was the first Republican I revo I've ever voted for.
And he was the right man at the right time.
And that's where Trump is.
He's the right man.
Well, you know, it's interesting.
The establishment hated Reagan.
The Republican establishment everybody, but but notably the Republican Party hated Reagan.
They were free.
They didn't like conservatives, still don't.
And they also said Reagan was a dunce.
They said Reagan was an idiot.
They said Reagan was sleeping through cabinet meetings, and Reagan was a B movie actor, and he was this or that.
It's it's standard operating procedure.
The way the establishment insults their opponents is to try to tell everybody that they're dumb, they're slow, they're stupid, they're unsophisticated, they're dangerous.
You can't trust them in their finger next to the nuclear launch button.
You can't do they it's the same thing no matter who the candidate is, could be Newt Gingrich, it it could be Sarah Palin, it could be Ronald Reagan, it could be Trump.
Now it doesn't matter who it is, that's the way they go after and try to disqualify people.
Well, that's true, but if you look at the time when Jimmy Carter was in there.
Yeah, with Iran and making all its threats on us and everything all the time, and everything he did to try to subdue them, you know, was just a joke.
I mean, the guy was an idiot.
Uh I mean, that's the way I felt about it.
I felt that the country just couldn't stand four more years of that.
Well, yeah, agreed, but Carter's greatest damage was on the economy.
I mean, that just he just wreaked havoc on the economy.
Yeah, I was twenty-three years old and I couldn't keep a job because as fast as I'd go to work for somebody to close up.
Yeah, you couldn't keep gasoline in your tank either.
No.
Stand in line for it.
Yeah.
But uh, yeah, like you say, I I honestly believe that with Donald Trump, uh I don't think anybody's gonna beat him.
Because he's the only one saying anything that makes sense.
Well, let me ask you a question about that, since I have you and since you've just made that uh statement.
Do you think do you think uh you so you think Trump can win a nomination?
You think Trump can beat Hillary?
Huh?
Oh, yeah.
No, no question.
No question, because I'll tell you the Republican Party is is running around in in uh apoplexy, and they're telling everybody, oh my God, if Trump wins, we're finished.
Hillary's gonna mop the floor with oh my God, there's no way Trump, the independence gonna be running away from Trump, oh my God, we're dead.
Trump can set this party back twenty-five years if he gets a nominated.
That's what the Republican.
There's no way he can beat Hillary.
If Trump wins, the Republican Party, as we know it is done.
They'll either they'll either have to come in line with the people or they'll never get another vote.
Uh what if the Republican Party loses?
Nobody wanted him.
How many times did he run?
Nobody wanted him.
He was just another liberal.
I mean, I'm just saying, if they if if they do something like that, if if the Republican Party gets a nominee, they want and they lose.
What does that mean for their future?
They're done.
So they're done either way.
That's what you're saying.
If Trump wins, they're done.
And if Trump loses, they're done.
Yeah.
I I don't see him recovering from this.
They've got such a bad reputation now, you know, since this Obama thing that nobody trusts them, believes him for anything.
What's the point?
There's no reason to vote for them.
Yeah, well, I uh I don't know that it's that bad.
But I'll tell you what.
There are a lot of people scratching their heads over why in seven years the Republican Party hadn't found a way to disagree with Obama.
That's their purpose.
They've run for election, they've campaigned on their promise to stop Obama, repeal Obama, all that stuff.
They don't do any of it.
How in the world, after seven years, can you not have an identity of opposing Obama and standing with a majority of the American people.
Here, grab audio sound by this is uh this is number number five.
I didn't just make this up.
Charlie Rose last night on his show on PBS talking to Mark Howard.
These people do not they talk to each other.
You know, it's amazing.
On all of their shows, they all appear on each other's shows.
I mean, you talk about talking to hear your head rattle, that's all these people do.
They never have anybody on that they don't agree with or don't understand.
They're all just chatting with themselves, be at the round table on meet the press, you name it.
There's no outreach to anybody else who's not already in their crowd.
It's stunning to watch this.
Anyway, Charlie Rose with Mark Howpert last night, Charlie Rose said, are you saying, Mark, that if the Republican Party unites against Donald Trump that they can't stop him?
The establishment now will not accept Trump as a nominee.
They will fight him to the end, including at the convention if they need to.
And I think they'll run someone else if he does become the nominee.
Meaning somebody's in the field or no, someone like Mitt Romney or Mitch Daniels, someone else, to step forward to say we've got a safe place to vote because we cannot be the party of Trump.
Romney Ryan at the convention is the way the party would go, and they'd say, America, you were wrong, we're giving you a second chance.
Now, he doesn't just make this stuff up, folks.
All of these people talk to each other.
And the Republican Party leaks what they want.
Certain people know they go to Politico, one of their favorite sources to leak to.
Halpern didn't just pull this out of thin air.
He just said that last night on Charlie Rose that if Trump is the nominee, the Republican Party will not accept it and will go back.
It won't go to anybody currently in the field because there isn't anybody that jazzes them.
They're gonna go back to Mitt Romney or maybe Mitch Daniels.
And then they'll choose Ryan as the VEP again, and they're going to go back to the American people, say, look, we gave you a chance to elect this brilliant team in 2012, and you blew it.
We're going to give you a second chance to this is.
Now, my point is if he's saying this, somebody, somewhere in whatever circle he travels in has also postulated this.
And not the first time we've heard the Republican Party thinking about reaching out to Romney.
Not the first time we've heard Romney thinking about running again.
Not the first time we've heard any.
And I guarantee you something else.
If Trump isn't the nominee, but Ted Cruz is, they'll do the same thing.
They won't support a Ted Cruz nomination either.
At the highest levels of Republican Party, they're in a constant panic.
Because then now, even if they do succeed, if they were to succeed in taking Trump out, now they're looking at Cruz.
And that scares them even more.
Don't doubt me.
Back after this.
This is outrageous.
DailyCaller.com.
This has to be heartbreaking.
This ab d this has to be soul crushing for the families of those who were murdered in Benghazi.
New Clinton email shows Pentagon had forces ready to respond to Benghazi attack.
American military forces were available for a rescue operation not long after the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi came under attack, September 11, 2012, according to an email to Hillary Clinton's closest aides.
The September 11, 2012 email was sent at 7.19 p.m. Eastern by then Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash.
Here's the text.
I just tried you on the phone, but you were all in with S. That's an apparent reference to Clinton, Secretary of State.
After consulting with General Dempsey, General Hamm and a joint staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi.
They are spinning up as we speak.
They include a redacted.
Assuming principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask state to procure the approval from the host nation, Libya.
Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us, redacted.
Among the recipients of this email, Jacob Sullivan, Clinton's deputy chief of staff, the under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Wendy Sherman, and the Deputy Secretary of State Thomas Nidas.
The first assault on the facility's main compound began around 9.40 p.m.
Libya time, 3.40 p.m. in Washington.
The second attack on a related CIA annex, 1.2 miles away, began three hours later, about 12 a.m. local time, or 6 p.m. Eastern time.
Judicial watch, the nonprofit government watchdog obtained the email from the Department of State after suing the government under the Freedom of Information Act in September of 2014.
So it's taken about 16 months to get this email.
I cannot, I cannot imagine the pain of the families of the four who were murdered in Benghazi when they heard about this.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were told.
There was a response force.
Rescue otherwise, ready to go, spinning up.
But no, it had to be a surprise attack brought on by this video.
In order to make sure the election of Barack Obama didn't face any roadblocks a few short weeks later.
Hillary and Obama were playing politics.
Instead of protecting those they put in harm's way.
Okay, we have posted a link to the seven-minute video, Darth Trump.
Have you watched it, Snerdley?
I didn't mind you laughing in there.
We posted it now.
You'll see at the top of the page at Rushlinbaugh.com.
It's a YouTube video.
We've linked to it.
And when you get a moment, it's really clever.
Really, really well done.
▲
Export Selection