All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 2, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:36
December 2, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And I have another pregunta.
Little Spanish lingo there for question.
Sir Robert Deer, guy running around shooting a Planned Parenthood, the only words he mumbled anybody can understand with no more body parts.
So immediately the left runs, starts assuming, aha, it's a bunch of mad insane lunatic right wingers.
My question is, is it only conservatives offended by the selling of body parts?
Are Democrats not offended by that?
Is the left not offended by the selling of body parts?
Apparently not.
Apparently, when you start talking about chopping up babies and selling body parts, the only people bothered by it are quote-unquote right wingers.
You mean to tell me there's not a single Democrat out there that's bothered by that?
The media is so certain of that that when you hear about somebody going nuts because they're chopping up babies and selling body parts.
Oh, it has to be a right winger upset by it.
It has to be a conservative, you know, those lunatics, they just they're not tolerant at all.
Oh, okay.
Greetings, welcome back, great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, Limbaugh Institute, advanced conservative studies.
Let's head to the audio sound bites.
Dingy Harry.
Aiming at me again, this time from the floor of the Senate.
We have uh a couple of sound bites here.
Here we go with number one.
No one is safe in this Republican vitriol.
Republicans demagogue women seeking health care through Planned Parenthood.
Republicanists use women, infants, and children seeking refuge from terrorism to fearmonger.
Over and over again.
Republican candidates have resorted to hatred of appealing to the highest sensibilities of the American people.
We all know that on race and other controversial issues, Republicans have long practiced subtle bigotry.
But Republicans now simply say out loud the many things which they used to merely hint.
Words have power and when spoken by influential leaders, they infiltrate every corner of our society.
And we know how exaggerated and untruthful and unfair the film that was put together as some B-grade movie, as so maligned Planned Parenthood.
What a joke this man has become.
An absolute joke.
He's an embarrassment to the United States Senate.
He's an embarrassment to human race.
He's an embarrassment to the state of Colorado.
And he Nevada.
Well, Colorado's probably embarrassed too.
And he ought to be embarrassed of himself.
And when spoken by influential leaders, I wonder who he could be talking about.
Instead of recognizing the concerns of Community's riddle by decades of police brutality and racial injustice, Republicans have vilified the Black Lives Matter movement, which has drawn attention to these disturbing inequities.
Rush Limbaugh has gone so far as labeling the protesters a hate group, a hate group for trying to bring equality our criminal justice system.
Just a few weeks ago, supporters of Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump tanked a Black Lives Matter protester on video at a rally.
Instead of condemning the vile display by his supporters, Donald Trump encouraged it.
Notice how he paused before and after my name, make sure everybody understood who he was talking about.
Black Lives Matter movement, which has drawn attention to these disturbing inequities.
Rush Limbaugh has gone so far as labeling the protesters a hate group.
We'll get to what I said about them in just a second.
I want to go back to soundbite number one.
No one's safe in this Republican vitriol.
Republicans demagogue women seeking health care through police.
This is all made up.
The man is an embarrassment, and I know that there are still many people in the Democrat Party in the drive-by media, the low information crowd that when this guy speaks or when it gets actually don't listen to him, they see uh what he says as reported.
I understand that the people still carry some influence.
I've I folks, I frankly think that that uh this stuff is not universally accepted and believed as as it used to be when these Democrats Like Reed, get up and start spouting this stuff.
Just a uh a couple of things.
Robert Deer, the shooter at Planned Parenthood, no connection to the Republican Party.
He had no connection to the pro-life movement or to anybody.
He was a loner.
He was a lunatic.
He lived like the leftist unibomber in a shack with no running water and no heat.
And isn't it interesting?
And I'm amazed by something here.
When we are hit by Islamic terrorists, or when Islamic terrorists conduct a terror strike or terror attack, what is what do we first hear?
This is not Islam.
This is not who they are.
That is the religion of peace.
And then we hear about we've got to be very, very vigilant to make sure there is no backlash, right?
So when militant Islamists attack, the drive-by media and the Democrat Party get into gear to try to tell everybody it's not Islam.
It's not anything but a religion of peace.
And these people conducting terror attacks, they've got nothing to do with Islam.
Nothing to do with the religion of peace.
When an oddball lunatic like this guy in Colorado shoots up Planned Parenthood, all of a sudden, he represents the entire pro-life movement and the Republican Party combined.
Isn't it amazing?
Real acts of terrorism are excused and said to have nothing to do with Islam.
And you're a bigot if you think so.
And you'd better not overreact because there better not be any backlash against them.
This guy goes nuts, and all of a sudden there's Dingy Harry.
It's the entire Republican Party to blame.
And the pro-life movement.
As I pointed out, the pro-life movement, the numbers of these incidents pale.
They are infinitesimal compared to the number of terror attacks carried out by militant Islamist jihadists.
Not even comparable.
And as Black Lives Matter, this is a real stretch to bring me into this.
This just demonstrates that Dingy Harry and whoever it is that's informing him here, believe that all you have to do is mention my name, and you have effectively blanketed the entire opposition of the Democrat Party.
I have come to represent that.
I represent in totality the opposition to the Democrat parties.
So you invoke my name.
What did old Dingy say here?
Republicans have vilified the Black Lives Matter movement, which has drawn attention to these disturbing inequities.
Rush Limbaugh's gone so far as labeling the protesters a hate group, a hate group for trying to bring equality in our criminal justice system.
You see what happened to Martin O'Malley and poor Bernie Sanders when they tried telling a group all lives matter?
They were the victims of a terror attack while they were on stage at their own rally.
Because all lives don't matter.
Dingy Harry just is not about equality, it's not about inequity, it's not about anything.
But let's go back to the archives, the grooveyard back on September 1st.
This is what I said, what I actually said about the Black Lives Matter movement.
And what I actually said was maybe somebody will allege that Black Lives Matter, maybe, is a hate group.
Here's what I said compared to what Dingy Harry has accused me of saying.
People wonder, Run Gee, why wonder why all these attacks on the cops?
Anybody remember hands up, don't shoot?
You know, I all this black lives matter, somebody will allege that black lives matter, maybe as a hate group or what, and that people erupt.
How can you say that?
They're a peace-loving protest organization.
What do you mean a hate group?
Well, I'm just listening to what they say.
But do you remember hands up, don't shoot?
It didn't happen.
Do you know how many people in this country still think it did?
Do you realize how many people in this country still think that the gentle giant was murdered in the back?
That he was trying to surrender, his hands were up, shouting, don't shoot, don't shoot.
He was running away, and a cop came out of the car and shot him.
You know how many people still believe that crap?
And you know why they do?
MEDIA combined with civil rights groups like Black Lives Matter.
That's why they believe it, because the lie has been purposely promulgated.
And if people believe it, and you move from Ferguson to Baltimore, where you have another series of lies about cop killing there.
And people can't find a motive.
Well, well, well, well.
Turns out that Dingy Harry was misinformed by his uh out of context fact checkers at Media Matters.
Here's what I said.
I was I was uh quoting other people, asking whether other people would allege.
I didn't allege it myself, although I wouldn't have cared if I did, but that's not the point.
The point is he's putting words in my mouth I didn't say.
People are wondering, gee, why I mean, uh wonder why all these attacks on the cops.
Anyone remember hands up, don't shoot, all this black lives matter.
Somebody's gonna allege black lives matter, maybe as a hate group or what.
And then people erupt.
How can you say that?
They're a peace-loving protest organ.
I was predicting that something was going to be said about Black Lives Matter.
Dingy Harry has no idea what he said.
Whoever writes his stuff for his floor speeches in the Senate.
Look what limbos.
This is exactly what happened in the phony soldiers thing, which ended up raising four and a half million dollars.
Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation is you remember that.
I don't need to relive the whole thing.
But it's just classic what happens here.
As far as the left is concerned.
And the easiest way to understand it is that they're not honest.
They lie about what people say.
They put words in people's mouths.
They attempt to impugn entire groups of people, all for the furtherance of their political agenda.
This isn't even about equality.
It's not about fairness, it's not about compassion.
It's not about anything except eliminating political opposition.
That's all Dingy Harry is interested in.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out here.
We're going to come back and uh well, no, there's one, maybe two more sound bites related to this.
Let me get them out of the way, and then we'll come back and change gears.
C SPAN today.
Washington Journal, the guest is Representative Suzanne.
I'm sorry, it's Susan Del Big, Democrat Washington, during a viewer call-in segment.
We had a caller named George in Kentucky.
And the Congresswoman have this conversation.
The overall heated rhetoric over the last several years from the GLP, whether it's on Rush Limbaugh or all these the virulent language that they use.
It goes back to the health care forums in 2009 and 2010 when they went to health care forums to shut them down and shout down and they're yelling baby parts, baby parts, but echo this.
You get so many people stirred up.
It has led to violent attacks.
It's incredibly um disappointing and frankly irresponsible that folks have continued to perpetuate misinformation.
Words do matter.
These videos that have been proven to be deceptively edited.
You've not seen the unedited videos, very disappointing that that is.
All right, stop it.
That's just not true.
I mean, I I don't know what more to do with this.
It's just not true.
The entire unedited videos are on display at the Outfit's website.
There was no editing to change the meaning, substance, content, what have you.
The only edits were for time.
It's you people who do the edits, NBC editing a 911 call to try to implicate George Zimmerman as a racist in the Trayvon Martin circumstance.
In that event.
Anyway, there's nothing you can do with these people, folks.
I mean, Media Matters structures a lie.
They pass it on to Dingy Harry.
He goes to the floor of the U.S. Senate with it.
And this Democrat Congresswoman from Washington doesn't have the slightest idea what the Planned Parenthood videos were.
She hasn't seen them.
She only knows what she's been told they are.
She's out there paired, and this stupid idiot caller hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about because he's the product of these stupid misinformed websites where he reads gets his information.
So you got a bunch of lies and distortions and literal insanity informing half the people of this country.
It's a wonder we're still together.
Turning to the Republican presidential primary.
Two stories on the same data.
Trump leads, Carson Fades in National Poll.
That's from the Hill.com.
CNN, Trump leads as Carson fades.
Donald Trump continues to hold a commanding national lead over the field of Republican presidential contenders as Ben Carson falls back into the pack, according to a new poll.
This is Quinnipiac University Survey.
Released today, Trump's 27%, 10-point lead over the closest contender.
It's a slight increase for Trump who stood at 24% in the same poll last month.
Tim Malloy, the assistant director of the Quinnipiac University poll said, it doesn't seem to matter what he says.
It doesn't seem to matter who he offends.
Whether the facts are contested or the political correctness is challenged, Donald Trump seems to be worrying Kevlar.
He has now doubled down on his tens of thousands of Muslims cheering on 9-11 comment.
And they have found even more evidence.
They have found even more reporting, ladies and gentlemen, that the drive-by's ignored about Trump and his comments.
There, I don't have it in the current stack right in front of me, but there is another instance of media reporting.
Talking about a bunch of people on rooftops cheering.
It's the third separate media report that's now been found.
Rubio in the Quinnipiac poll is in second place, 17%.
Ben Carson has dropped seven points in the last poll.
Rubio and Cruz have each gained three points.
Jeb Bush is in a distant fifth place with 5%.
Jeb Bush recently said, I can't believe this.
I mean, I I this is one of the things I had yesterday in the stack that I didn't get to.
And I didn't get to nothing.
It wasn't on purpose.
It just, you know, I do things as I feel them.
And for some reason, I just didn't.
I chose other things over some other things, and the Jeb Bush thing was one thing that I glossed over, and it was this.
It was a story from I think over the Thanksgiving week, and it might have been Jeb appearing on a Sunday show, at which he actually said that it is important to elect somebody who can work with the Democrats to get things done, to form consensus so that legislation can be passed and signed into law.
And others echoed Jeb there saying, Yeah, we've just had seven years of a petulant, immature president who refused to work with the opposition.
And we see the damage.
And we don't need another four years of a megalomaniac who refuses to work with the opposition.
And Jeb holding himself out as the one guy in the Republican field who could do it.
You talk about tone deaf.
Furthermore, are we really supposed to sit here and believe that the reason Obama has been able to get away with all that he's gotten away with is because the Republicans did not work with him?
Are you are you kidding me?
Seriously.
The rap on Obama is that he did not work with the other side.
He refused to cooperate.
He didn't get consensus, and therefore we don't we don't need another four or eight years like this.
Who in the world who Thinks like that still has a job for crying out loud.
I I've got to take a break here, but I'll explain what I mean when we get back and get back to your phone calls as well.
Ted Krustack coming up, hang in there.
Here it is.
That's what I was talking about.
It's audio sound right number 14.
By the way, Rudy Giuliani is backing Trump up as well.
Trump's exaggerating, but it happened.
Trump has doubled down on it, which is Trump's trademark.
Trump says something, drive by's go, my God, I can't believe you said that.
You didn't mean that.
You can't get away with saying that.
You can't trust Trump says, Oh, yeah, well, try this, and doubles down on it.
And sends them into pure apoplexy.
This is a WCBS Channel 2 Eyeball News New York report from September 16, 2001.
Snaredly, you remember this guy, Pablo Guzman.
You do remember Pablo.
Is it good or bad?
You remember Pablo Go.
Well, he was, he was a standard fiction local news.
Yeah, I have other memories of the guy, but they're irrelevant to this.
Anyway, Pablo Guzman, who was a street reporter, Channel 2 Eyeball News in New York this September 16th.
He's reporting about police and FBI investigators raiding a Jersey City, New Jersey apartment building where people were celebrating a 9-11 attacks.
Imagine that.
There's another apartment builder.
One that investigator told me court is swarming with suspects.
Suspects who I'm told were cheering on the roof when they saw the plane slammed into the trade center.
Police were called to the building by other neighbors and filed eight men celebrated.
Six of them tenants in the building.
The FBI and other terrorist task force agencies that arrived, and the older investigators on the task force recalled that they had been to this building before, eight years ago, when the first World Trade Center attack led them to shape Omar Abdel Rahman, whose Jersey City mosque lies between the two buildings getting attention together.
Yeah, forgotten it.
Omar Abdel Rahman's mosque was out there too, right in the in the sight lines.
And so he's could you hear that?
It was really tunnel audio.
Were you able to hear it?
Okay.
So I don't need to reread this so people understand what he said.
All right, he said there's another apartment building, one that an investigator told me, quote, is swarming with suspects.
Suspects who I'm told were cheering on the roof when they saw the plane slam into the World Trade Center.
Now police were called to the building by other neighbors.
Found eight men celebrating, six of them tenants in the building.
The FBI and other terror task force agencies that arrived, and the older investigators on the task force recalled that they had been to this building before eight years ago.
When the first World Trade Center attack, that was 1993, led them to Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, whose Jersey City Mosque lies between the two buildings getting attention today.
So these drive-by's news stories that they just keep popping up that all the drive-by fact checkers just didn't manage to find.
And here's Trump doubling down last night, Waterville Valley, New Hampshire.
One of the things comes out in the poll that I have the most loyal people.
People say he can do anything.
He can do anything.
So I don't know if that's right, but they say that I have the most loyal people.
You know, others, if you sneeze, they drop you.
Me, I can sneeze, I can I can say things that I think are right.
Do you notice what's happening in New Jersey?
A lot of people are saying, yeah, that did take place in New Jersey, right?
I wasn't going to apologize.
I wasn't going to apologize.
A lot of things happened today where they were dancing and they were happy.
There were a lot of happy people over in New Jersey.
And I saw it, and a lot of people saw it, and I'm getting hundreds of phone calls, and a lot of other people are too.
And things are all of a sudden materializing.
Now, this is a fascinating thing that's happening here.
Follow me on this.
Trump first alleges tens of thousands of people celebrating in New Jersey.
The drive by says, Wait, that's just not possible.
He's making it up.
It's outrageous.
We hate Trump.
This is Trump being typical Trump that we hate.
And they immediately begin to try to disprove what Trump said.
So they go into action with all their fact checkers.
They get AP fact checkers, Washington Post fact checkers, UPI fact checkers, Reuters fact checkers, and they all go back through their archives.
And they don't find anything.
And since they didn't report it, it didn't happen.
This is key.
To them, it didn't happen because they didn't report it.
And then somebody said, wait a minute, the Washington Post did report it, and their fact-checker, a guy named Glenn Kessler glossed over it, missed it, or just ignored it.
And the Washington Post story was reproduced, and people, oh yeah.
They were talking about a bunch of people celebrating the Twin Towers going down in New Jersey.
The drive-by-that just did they did it so long ago the reporter doesn't remember.
And they made fun of Trump for making fun of the reporter.
They said Trump was mocking the reporter who happens to be disabled.
Trump says, no, no, no, no, I saw it.
And what's happening now is that a lot of other people who saw the same thing are talking about it with each other on Twitter and Facebook.
And Trump spends a lot of time on Twitter and Facebook.
So you have two worlds here.
You have the drive-by media, which didn't report it and says it didn't happen.
Then you have Facebook and Twitter, which is real people, recounting what they've said and seen and what they've heard, and that forms its own loop that keeps going with people adding to it, and Trump sees that and says, I've seen it.
I saw it, I've seen it, a lot of people see it.
Over here, the media, it didn't happen.
We didn't report it.
It didn't happen.
Trump's lunatic.
Trump's crazy.
Trump says, the hell I am.
It did happen.
I got people telling me they saw it.
It's all over Facebook.
It's all over Twitter.
You heard him say, I got hundreds of people calling me and emailing.
They saw it.
Media over here.
It didn't happen because we didn't report it.
Object lesson in the media.
I was reminded of a story yesterday, in fact, that John O'Sullivan tells in a book that he wrote on Margaret Thatcher.
John O'Sullivan used to be National Review Online, National Reviews the Editor, and he was ranking member of Lady Thatcher's staff.
And this story is about the beginnings of the protest movement of the labor movement in Poland.
Starting to protest the communist government there.
And O'Sullivan in the book on Thatcher tells the story that Pope John Paul VI, when this began to happen, asked, is there media there?
If there isn't, get media there.
If the media doesn't report this, nobody's going to believe it's happening.
He was prescient and he understood, and so they got media there.
I don't the process by which that happened, but it it makes the point that the media, in and of itself, can rely on themselves.
If they don't report something, it didn't happen.
Or it wasn't worth reporting because it was so insignificant if they didn't report it.
And that's what they rely on, and that forms the crux of the contrat right now between the media and Trump.
They can't find any evidence of it because they didn't report it.
Just that one Washington Post story.
But then there was a New York Times, a New York Post story.
And now Pablo Guzman, eyeball news to New York.
And there's going to be more.
They're going to find more mainstream media reporting of this that the drive-by fact checkers have missed because they don't want to find it.
And so Trump is doubling down on it.
And now the Quinnipia Act Polster says, I don't make any sense.
He can't offend anybody.
He can't, no matter what he says, no matter what he does, it doesn't hurt him.
We've never seen this.
I said, hello.
This is the precise value that Trump is demonstrating.
No, my point is here that you don't have to be afraid of the media if you're a Republican.
And you don't have to be afraid of violating political correctness.
If you're a Republican, there's a hunger in the general population for people who are willing to ignore all that and just stand up and say What it is.
People are fed up with fear of the media.
People are fed up with fear of political correctness.
People are fed up with the Republican Party afraid of being called racist or whatever it is.
Just get up and say it.
What you know to be true.
Just get up and say it and screw them.
That's what Trump's doing, and he's being rewarded for it.
That's what I find so incredulous.
I mean, I look, I I've this Jeb stuff.
It's not it's uncomfortable.
I just thought I'm the guy that can cross the eye and guy that can work with a Democrats, form a consensus, get things done.
I mean I don't know.
Hmm.
How can you miss so vividly what's happening in this campaign?
And I don't understand it.
Well, actually I do.
Actually, I do.
You know what this you know where that comes from?
It's rooted in the belief that Trump's going to bomb, that Trump's going to fade out, that Trump's going to implode, that something's going to happen, and that the electorate at some point's going to wake up and want a traditional inside experienced politician to be president.
That's what they're banking on in the Bush campaign.
I I without knowing it, I mean, I know it.
Nobody's told me that.
I'm just surmising it.
Okay, the cruise stack coming up.
We'll we'll start it with a phone call.
We got somebody on the phone who wants to ask questions about it, and that'll launch the cruise stack, sit tight, coming right back.
Let me remind you something from the report from Pablo Guzman, Channel 2 Eyeball News.
He's talking about swarms of suspects on the rooftop.
Don't confuse the fact that the number eight were arrested.
That's just the number detained.
There were swarms on the rooftop in New Jersey, as the towers were going down.
But now what you have to do, you have to put it all together.
You go back to 9-11, and then you go to the next day and the next day, and the media is reporting.
And now we've got reporting in the Washington Post talking about Muslims celebrating in New Jersey.
Channel 2 eyeball news, swarms of people.
Trump probably saw all of this and read all of this.
The New York Post with a story on the celebrating, and who knows what else is going to be found.
You put all these reports together as a consumer of news in the immediate aftermath of 9-11 wouldn't be hard to figure there were a whole lot of people celebrating this.
It was reported.
And yet the drive-by media is calling Trump a wire.
You got Giuliani now backing it up.
If Rudolph Giuliani is not an authoritative source on whether Muslims celebrated in New Jersey, then who the heck it is.
We know it's not the drive-bys.
They're out there denying it.
So what Trump's supposed to believe them versus what he saw at the time.
And it wasn't just Trump that saw it.
I mean, if you're in New York in the immediate aftermath and you see these reports on the news, you're going to get the idea a lot of people were celebrating this.
Sounds like vindication to me, folks.
Okay, Seth Green Castle, Indiana.
Glad you waited, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
It's an honor to speak with you.
Megadetto's here from the Hoosier State.
From my granddad to my uncles, to my dad to myself, and even now to my sons.
You've got lifetime listeners here in the Hoosier State.
Thank you very much, sir.
Really appreciate that.
Let me get right to my point here.
Um I'm calling in regards to some of the statements that Senator Cruz has made the last couple of days, and of course he's come under some huge massive fire from the left.
And uh I really want to speak as to why I think that they absolutely cringe every time he opens his mouth.
Uh, you know, the reason I think that they hate Rush Limbaugh, the reason I think they hate Christians, uh, the reason I think they hate uh Senator Cruz really is because you're looking at a group of truth tellers.
And that's what they cannot stand.
They cannot stand truth tellers because their power is uh directly linked to the deception that's that's behind who they are as individuals and what their view is of America.
I think you're on to something.
I would just I would I would make one clarification, and it's a it's a subtle point, but I think it's important.
They really do think that Cruz and me are liars.
They they do not sit There and say to themselves, we're lying to people every day, we're fooling them, we're deceiving them, and then we come along and tell the truth and feel threatened.
They don't feel threatened by the truth.
They construct, they're pathological.
They construct their own alternative reality.
They end up believing is real.
And then people like Cruz comes along, come along, and just blow it to Smitterines.
With the truth, with the truth, and force them to face the fact that they are living a series of lies and deceptions, and that's why they go bonkers.
I couldn't agree more.
Absolutely correct.
It's not, it's a it's a subtle point.
It may not even be that big a point.
But I I think it's important.
They don't really look at us as truth tellers.
They look at us as bombers.
We are blowing up their reality.
That's exactly right.
Exactly right.
Well, I look, I appreciate your uh uh lumping me in uh the way you did.
Absolutely.
And I'll tell you, uh, it's been a pleasure to listen to you, my boys, every time your music starts.
They know that Rush Limbaugh's getting ready to come on.
Right on.
Right on.
Well, thank you.
Thank you so much, Seth.
I I appreciate that.
Um I mentioned at top of the program that uh Cruz made mincemeat of a an info bay for ABC News.
Cruz is out saying this this is an example, exactly what the caller's talking about.
Ted Cruz is a majority of violent criminals are Democrats.
Now they just that just drives them nuts.
How can somebody lie like that?
How can somebody just make that up?
That's just absurd.
But it happens to be true, and that's why.
They don't look at themselves as coddling violent criminals.
They think of themselves as defending victims of an unfair criminal justice system.
And Ted Cruz comes along and tells them what they're really doing, and they can't handle it.
Let's get started with the soundbite here.
This is um ABC News website.
Unidentified infobabe talking to Ted Cruz in the hall outside his office.
And he has he's made the point here that the majority of violent criminals are Democrats.
And the infobabe says that study that you cite, that only cites a few states as having a majority Democrat registration.
So your assertion that it reflects the overwhelming majority nationwide, that's not accurate, Senator.
It is exactly accurate.
We can draw a reasonable inference.
When elected Democrats support putting judges on the bench that release violent criminals, when elected Democrats, such as President Obama try to appoint a senior Justice Department officials, lawyers who glorify and lionize cop killers, when elected Democrats push to give felons the right to vote, it is a perfectly rational and reasonable inference to say those Democrats understand that the overwhelming majority of violent criminals vote Democratic.
You don't like that.
I understand that.
In the state of New York, 62% of ex-felons who registered to vote, registered as Democrats, 9% registered as Republicans.
Those are the facts.
Now his point is unassailable.
Uh terms of logic or fact, it's unassailable.
You draw reasonable inferences.
Elected Democrats support putting judges on the bench who are going to release violent criminals because of the way they vote.
It's no different why they're going to support amnesty because the illegals vote Democrat, majority of refugees vote Democrat.
That's why the Democrats do all.
He's just connecting the dots, and the reporterette was just befuddled.
There's another companion bite that goes with this, but alas, my friends, we are out of programming time for this busy broadcast segment, but there's always more, so hang in there.
And that's it for this busy, exciting broadcast hour.
▲
Export Selection