All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 25, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:48
November 25, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 247 podcast.
I got this song in my mind.
I can't get it out of there.
You guys watch Fargo?
You watch TV show Fargo?
I mean, it's one of these low rent, guttural, you know, it's like you wouldn't want to ever live anywhere, but you can't stop watching it.
Just a great cover.
You remember the old Kenny Rogers uh just dropped in to see what condition my condition.
Well, they had a theme song last night by some group called White Denim covering it.
And I can't get that song out of my head here.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
That's right, my friends.
We're gonna do open line Friday on Wednesday today because today is the last day for live broadcast hosted by me here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
It's great to have you here.
The telephone number is 800 282-2882 and the email address, Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
We're gonna have a little bit, not a whole lot more, we're gonna have a little bit of an expanded Thanksgiving themed program today.
We're going to do the usual things.
As a tradition established on this program going back to 1992.
And that is, I read to you from my very first ever book.
The true story of Thanksgiving.
The name of the book is the way is the way things ought to be, and it was uh over two million copies sold, and the true story of Thanksgiving, chapter six, and a couple of other things.
George Washington's uh first Thanksgiving proclamation is a great piece today in the stack on the subject of gratitude and how important a virtue it is.
And of course, gratitude is what uh Thanksgiving is uh is all about.
Let me ask you this.
Have you have you Yeah, I know, I know Obama's out there, he you could predict this.
All morning long, they have been saying that Obama's gonna address the nation on national security and so forth.
I said, Wonder when that's gonna start.
And lo and behold, it started at 1204.
And now it's over with and he's finished, and then I we were never gonna jip it.
Join in progress.
Little inside real radio announcer terminology.
But it's over now, and basically what it was uh about was Obama telling everybody, don't sweat it.
We got 65 nations, we're going after ISIS, we're kicking ISIS all over the planet.
There's no way ISIS can get into the country.
We're doing everything we can to stop ISIS attacks.
I don't want you to worry about any domestic terror attacks happening here.
We're doing everything everything we can to stop them.
We're gonna go out there, we're gonna go get ISIS.
He calls them ISIL.
But but uh he said anyway, don't sweat it because um we got it under control here.
Go ahead and have Thanksgiving, and that is my next.
It's this is funny.
It's incredible.
Have you people received your Thanksgiving Day dinner Democrat talking points yet?
Three different places you can go get them.
The New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Democrat National Committee website, all with advice on how to deal with crazy conservatives that might be at your Thanksgiving dinner, and how to not have the day ruined by them.
How to speak to them, how to avoid them, how to ignore them, how to engage them, what to say, what not to say.
It is It's just hilarious.
Uh they effort all over the drive-by media.
There are articles everywhere telling people how to deal with their white uncle who supports Trump.
Uh crazy old grandma who doesn't embrace gay marriage.
Obama via Josh Ernest at the White House suggested that the that the topic at the Thanksgiving dinner table this year be gun control.
The White House, that's you didn't hear that.
Yeah, Josh Ernest went out there yesterday, said the preferred topic at Thanksgiving dinner tables this year from the White House is gun control.
Now, the Democrat Party, which has a whole website devoted to giving the party line response to any potential issue from Trump to climate change, actually gives you short lines that you're supposed to memorize and spout.
I would call it McCarthyism, sort of like Charlie McCarthyism.
These These people, honest to God, they are giving you lines to memorize in case your crazy conservative relatives say something about X. You are to memorize a line in response.
You just go to your Thanksgiving dinner and wait.
Poised for your conservative relatives to say something outrageous or offensive, and you have memorized your lines and you're ready for your reply.
Well, that's in fact, that Snerdley says, what if somebody brings me up and thanks?
That's been addressed.
That's in the Washington Post.
Washington Post even addresses that.
I'm sorry, it's a Democrat Party website.
Take it back, Democrat Party website.
One of these bottom of the page things that goes on to the next.com.
That's the subset of the DNC website.
The Democrat's Guide to Talking Politics with Your Republican Uncle.
How to talk to your Republican Uncle.
And it goes on and on and on.
Here are the most common myths spouted by your family members who spend too much time listening to Rush Limbaugh.
And here is the perfect response to each of them.
The DNC.
The Democrat Party actually is having their readers and their supporters prepare for Thanksgiving meal based on things I might say.
And then there's a section here on immigrants and uh and refugees.
You want an example some of this stuff?
Okay, let's just do the Washington Post How to Talk to Your Family About Politics this Thanksgiving by Philip Bump.
With the arrival of the holidays every year, political websites looking to ring a last few clicks out of people waiting at airports, dutifully put together how to talk about controversial political issues with your snotty relatives at Thanksgiving articles.
And so here is our offering at the Washington Post.
Number one, your obnoxious uncle speaks approvingly of something you think is racist, maybe Syrian refugees, for example.
It's very much the case that there are explicitly racist people out there in the world.
It's also the case that many more people hold beliefs or attitudes that are tinged to some degree with racist undertones.
So Washington Post readers today are being informed that most of the people are going to come in contact with over Thanksgiving are indeed racist or tinged with it.
And therefore they are to be on the lookout for it.
Maybe part of the problem is your misunderstanding.
Or also I'm an uncle, and I think it's funny to annoy my nieces and nephews.
So maybe your uncle is intentionally trying to rile you up because he thinks it's funny.
You're supposed to be on the lookout for anything.
Your conservative uncle might also have read this article and be laying in wait for you while you're laying in wait for him.
So your wacko conservative uncle could purposely be trying to tick you off.
Can you imagine a Democrat reading the post on all these things that you've got to be stealed for and ready for just to go be with your family on Thanksgiving?
Don't tell me I'm wrong when I tell you that everything these do is these people do is politics.
There's not a single thing that happens in the liberal world that is not oriented toward their agenda.
So guidelines for your obnoxious uncle speaking approvfully of um provingly of something you think is racist.
Another example, your grandmother.
Notice it's always your elderly relatives, no doubt bordering on senility.
Or from an old bygone era of official racism and sexism and bigotry and homophobia.
So in this ankle example, the Washington Post, your grandmother uses a derogatory term for gay people.
If you're having a conversation with your grandmother at the dinner table, she was also born before 1975, only a few years after Stonewall.
She may not even know what Stonewall is.
Maybe your grandmother used the slur because she has always used that slur, and it's never occurred to her that it is a slur.
Or maybe she sincerely hates gay people.
After all, she is a conservative, because she's always hated gay people.
But maybe even as she worries about the ache in her hip, or as she looks into a mirror and sees more wrinkles Than she has years.
Maybe she'll try once again to understand this new thing that the world has presented to her.
Oh, it's not it's not just condescending, it's insulting, but look at the presumptive presumptions behind it.
That everybody's going to have elderly relatives that are conservatives, and they're all bigots, and they're all don't doubt me when I tell you this is just this is not just for Thanksgiving.
I mean, this is the way they look at people every day.
It's just on Thanksgiving.
Some days you can't avoid being with your relatives who are this whack.
So the Washington Post, New York Times has one of these too, and the DNC on how to deal with these embarrassing, bigoted racist members of your family.
and of course the DNC website.
The Democrats'Guide to Talking Politics with Your Republican Uncle.
Holiday season filled with food, traveling, lively discussions with Republican relatives about politics, sometimes laced with statements that are just not true.
See, your conservative family members, in addition to all these other bad things, they're liars too.
Here are the most common myths spouted by your family members who spend too much time listening to Rush Limbaugh, and the perfect response to each of them.
Immigrants and refugees.
Letting Syrian refugees into the U.S. is like hanging a welcome terrorist banner on the front door.
This is what they think I have told these relatives.
The U.S. has one of the strictest refugee screening processes in the world.
We can help families whose lives have been destroyed by ISIS without jeopardizing our security.
But when our leaders embrace Islamophobia, that makes it harder for us to fight terrorism abroad.
And not for nothing, screening refugees based on their religion goes against everything our country stands for.
Okay, so but no, you gotta keep you gotta put yourself here in the shoes of an average ordinary everyday liberal Democrat reading this, wanting guidance.
I mean, if why else would you go to the Democrat National Committee website?
What in the world is there that you must see?
I mean, if you're oriented towards spending time at the DNC website, you have a pretty pathetic life to begin with.
So, here come these false allegations and phony solutions, and by the way, screening refugees based on their religion goes against everything our country stands for.
My guess is you little liberals will finally or quickly learn that your elderly relatives know that that's totally untrue.
We have always screened for religion.
Always.
It has been a primary major factor in screening wannabe asylum seekers and refugees.
And I can imagine some of you liberals listen, that's just crazy.
I see this is the exact kind of stuff we have to deal with.
Limbo says this, and my relatives believe it, and I have to listen to this at Thanksgiving.
Well, let me ask you liberals a question.
All these asylum seekers say they're fleeing something.
Do you know what?
The number one thing most refugees say they are fleeing, religious persecution or political persecution.
In the case of religious persecution, somebody wants to be admitted to the country as a refugee.
We have to ask, well, where are you from?
They tell us.
Well, what religion are you?
We have to ask.
If they're if they're fleeing religious persecution, we've got to check their their veracity.
So what religion are you?
We ask.
We are required to.
We always have.
And then, as best we can, we vet what they tell us.
Now it's increasingly hard to do because there aren't any databases of these people that we can go vet.
So if they say they're from Syria and they're fleeing religious persecution, they identify their religion, and we go check and see what's going on underground in Syria, see if it could plausibly be true.
But the bottom line is we ask them.
We always have asked them.
In fact, it's statutory that we ask them.
But here go these people at DNC website, and they're the ones totally misinformed.
They are the ones proceeding essentially blind.
On the subject of the climate, if your relative who listens to me at Thanksgiving dinner brings up climate, the DNC website says climate change is just a liberal scare tactic.
That's what limbaugh listeners will tell you.
Why are conservatives more likely to believe that climate change is a conspiracy than to acknowledge that 97% of climate scientists, the majority of Americans believe it.
Climate change is real and it's man-made.
The Republican presidential field is living in denial.
That's what you are supposed to say.
What you liberal that what your your conservative relatives will probably tell you is that there is no such thing if they listen to me.
What they're going to tell you is 97% of scientists doesn't mean anything.
You don't have a scientific discovery till a hundred percent of them agree.
Besides that, there is no consensus in science because it isn't up for a vote.
The proposition either is or isn't.
The vote doesn't matter a hill of beans.
I think these poor little DNC Washington Post, New York Times readers, are going to be so woefully ill-equipped and unprepared to deal with Rush Limbaugh listeners at Thanksgiving.
That it's going to ruin their day, because they're going to show up thinking that they are loaded for bear.
They're going to show up thinking that they've got all the ammo they need, and that their conservative relatives are a bunch of hick hay seed kooks.
But they've been to the New York Times site and the Washington Post site and the DNC site, and they are fully armed, ready to go.
They've got all the facts to dispute everything.
And a typical Rush Limbaugh listener is going to be able to have them confused inside of 20 seconds, is going to ruin the day for the whole family.
And now, ladies and gentlemen to the New York Times, how to talk to your relatives about politics at Thanksgiving.
It's actually interactive on their website where you can provide them feedback and topics grow.
I don't have obviously the whole thing I printed out just some samples here.
It's time for that annual American holiday tradition, awkward political conversation at the Thanksgiving dinner table.
With the 2016 presidential primary campaign in full swing and public interest on the rise, the odds are good that relatives will share their thoughts with you about why one candidate will win or how another is going to destroy America.
I can't tell you how to keep your family away from sensitive topics.
But here are brief answers to some frequently asked questions about current events and the 2016 race.
The thing that is striking about all of these is that the Washington Post and the New York Times and the DNC all assume that their readers are rational and reasonable.
And it's only their family members who are the kooks and the extremists and the racists.
But remember to other family members, it's quite likely the person reading the Washington Post or the New York Times is the kook in the family.
It's quite likely that the liberal reading all of these advice pieces is the real kook in the family, and the rest of the family is trying to figure out how to deal with this wacko showing up armed and loaded for bear after having read all this liberal talking point stuff to get ready for Thanksgiving dinner.
Who is the cook here, by the way?
So, first possible discussion subject.
Will Donald Trump win?
Isn't he ahead in the polls?
Few observers expected Mr. Trump's early surge to last, but he's parlayed the immigration issue and extensive media coverage into a five-month lead in the polls that shows no signs of ebbing.
It's time to take seriously the possibility he could be the Republican nominee.
With that said, the best research on modern primary politics suggests that party elites should eventually coalesce around the strongest alternative to Trump and defeat him.
That's why betting markets currently put the chances of a Trump victory at twenty-three percent compared with Marco Rubio's 48th.
So if the subject of Trump comes up at a Thanksgiving dinner where a New York Times reader has shown up, the New York Times reader will tell the other bumpkins and wackos and weirdos in the family.
Hey, Trump isn't gonna make it.
Trump doesn't gotta get anything done.
Trump's a lot is a loser is a nutcase.
The Republican establishment doesn't want him, but the end of the day, they're all gonna coalesce.
They're gonna choose Rubio, Rubio's gonna be the nominee.
And this person can act smug and conceited because the New York Times gave them inside information on what's really going to happen here in the Republican primary.
Another question that comes up, says the Times is why won't some group pick a group name.
Why won't they believe the facts on, say, climate change?
From climate change to the debate over Syrian refugees, there's no shortage of topics in the news that could turn the dinner conversation ugly.
In general, people's factual beliefs are closely related to their political views, which makes it hard for information to change their minds, especially if they're feeling anxious or fearful.
So basically your relatives are idiots, it's not worth your time to try.
Thank you.
Thank you very, very much.
The Excellence in Broadcasting Network and Rush Limbaugh in our annual Thanksgiving program today.
In all seriousness, these New York Times, Washington Post, DNC websites, I mean, take a look at what they're really doing here.
They are...
You have a holiday here where families are getting together, and for the most part, everybody just wants to enjoy it and have a good time.
I mean, I know that your average family, there are people in every family that really don't look forward to it and resent other members.
I mean, they have families are families.
But here you have the Democrat Party and its media allies actually helping people prepare for stress and battle and war and so forth.
Most of this advice, most of the drive-by media advice on Thanksgiving discussions boils down to telling their readers to ignore whatever their crazy old conservative relatives say and just humor them because they're all going to be dead soon anyway.
And if if not dead, we're going to be able to put people in jail for saying things that we don't want to hear or don't like.
I mean, that's what's happening on college campuses.
More and more student groups are demanding the cancellation of free speech if it involves speech they disagree with.
Not making it up.
And in the meantime, most other people, the family just showing up to have a good time, watch little football, make as short a time of it as possible, or as long a time of it, whatever.
But these people are going to be showing up loaded for bear, ready to have arguments because everything in their life is oriented around all this.
And that I'm struck here by the New York Times advice specifically on Trump.
Ignore the polls.
The polls don't mean a thing.
What you ought to do is believe the gamblers in Las Vegas, the betters in Las Vegas, the people putting money on the outcome, 48% Rubio, 23% Trump.
None of this Trump stuff at the end is going to matter.
So here's the New York Times disparaging its own news delivery system in one sense, polling data.
Don't believe what we tell you.
Don't believe what's in the polls, the betters over here.
The gamblers, they're the ones that have a better insight into what's happening.
My point is I've always found that these family gatherings where friction exists.
It's always, well, I can't say always.
Vast majority of the time, it's the liberal Democrat members of the family who show up tense, stiff, just waiting for somebody to say something that offends them.
Just waiting and then launching or getting mad or calling people's names or what have basically ruining the day for everybody.
Anyway, I have a couple of sound bites of Obama here at his uh national security national address, which happened just over a half hour ago from some room in the White House.
Here's the first of two sound bites that we have.
We know of no specific and credible intelligence a plot on the homeland.
And that is based on the latest information I just received in the situation room.
So as Americans travel this weekend to be with their loved ones, I want them to know that our counterterrorism, intelligence, homeland security, and law enforcement professionals at every level are working overtime.
They are continually monitoring threats at home and abroad, continually evaluating our security posture.
They're constantly working to protect all of us.
Their work has prevented attacks.
So no imminent and credible threat.
We're doing everything we can.
We've got 60 nations aligned against ISIL.
Don't sweat it.
Everything's cool.
Here's the next sound bike.
The bottom line is this.
I want the American people to know, entering the holidays, that the combined resources of our military, our intelligence, and our homeland security agencies are on the case.
They're vigilant, relentless, and effective.
In the event of a specific credible threat, the public will be informed.
We do think it's useful for people as they're going about their business to be vigilant.
If you see something, suspicious, say something.
Yeah, like a conservative at the Thanksgiving dinner table that says something offensive.
Make sure you're prepared to tell somebody.
Now, why did Obama have to go out and do this today?
Why did somebody in the White House think it necessary to send the president out to try to calm people down to calm their nerves or what have you on the day before Thanksgiving?
Well, it's pretty obvious.
The reason somebody decided to send him I'm I'm I don't think he decided to do this on his own, although he could have, but I think I think it was probably command strategic decision in the White House.
Because it is clear that up until today, Obama hasn't said anything or much of anything that's inspired any confidence when national security is concerned.
Instead, he's been out talking about he doesn't like sloganeering, he doesn't like talking about winning, he doesn't like talking about American leadership, all of that that's beneath him.
That's just cheap stuff, and it doesn't mean anything, and it doesn't achieve anything.
He has not rallied the American people, he's not spoken up positively about the country.
Uh instead, whenever he does speak, it's always to regale everybody with the things that he believes are wrong with this country.
So it's it's clear, I think they've got some internal polling data in the White House uh that clearly indicates to them that this administration is not inspiring confidence when it comes to the very important subject of national security.
Now, I checked, I checked during the uh bottom of the hour break for emails.
I always do that.
And uh a bunch of people you you you you always you never miss, you never miss a chance to make fun of liberals and criticize liberals and blame them for all of this.
Well, I'm not the one.
You can't you will not go to the Rush Limbaugh website and find a story or a piece on how to deal with nutcase liberals at your family Thanksgiving table.
It's you people doing this.
And it's not me, and it's not people on our side who have routinely lied and run down the whole concept of Thanksgiving.
Liberals really don't like Thanksgiving for any number of reasons.
You can find the truth in that statement in the multicultural educational curriculum.
Liberals don't like Thanksgiving because they think it's racist.
They think Thanksgiving is all about white supremacy.
Thanksgiving is the result of white Europeans coming to this country and kicking out the Indians, obliterating the Native Americans, taking their land, taking everything they had, and settling the land for ourselves.
That's inherently racist, and it was warlike, and it was white supremacy, and they don't, they're made nervous by the holiday.
They also think that Thanksgiving's sexist.
You know why they think it's sexist?
This kind of goes back to Because traditionally, Thanksgiving, it's the women in the kitchen And the men in front of the TV watching football.
The Thanksgiving was always a holiday featuring the subordination and subjugation of women into traditional patriarchal domineering roles.
They also think Thanksgiving is killing the environment.
They think Thanksgiving celebrates environmental destruction.
Well, you have to get the food.
You have to raise the turkeys, you have to feed the turkeys, you have to do all whatever part of excess focus on food, too much food, too much environmental damage.
And of course, it's anti-animal rights, quite naturally.
And last but not least, don't doubt me on any of this.
This is all this these are the kind of things, by the way, if I may be selfish for a moment.
These are the kind of things and many other things like them why Catherine and I are writing these children's books.
The Truth of American History, The Truth of the American Founding.
Because liberals really think that Thanksgiving is ultimately about celebrating genocide.
They think the entire aspect, the entire series of events that led to American America being created by the discovery of white Europeans conquering this land, taking and stealing whatever we wanted.
And we had to kill people en route.
We had to kill people along the way.
Thanksgiving is a standing symbol of white European genocide.
Now I can imagine some of you looking at the radio, it's like, come on, this is over the top.
It is not.
If you doubt me, Google any of this.
You will find all kinds of documentation for it.
You'll find opinion pieces, op-ed pieces, you'll find more than what I'm telling you here that liberals find wrong with Thanksgiving.
There is one significant change, however, this year.
One significant change.
The Huffing and Puffington Post, normally, every Thanksgiving makes villains out of the pilgrims.
Most liberal publications, most leftists do.
I mean, the pilgrims were the original villains, white European villains.
They were the original genocide practitioners.
They came and killed and stole and conquered.
They took everything.
They were white European and religious freaks to boot.
But this year, the Huffing and Puffington Post says we need to think of the pilgrims in the same way we're looking at Syrian refugees today.
Yes, indeed.
The Huffing and Puffington Post wants us to remember that the pilgrims were a persecuted minority fleeing religious persecution and violence, just like the Syrian refugees, who are fleeing religious persecution and violence.
So they want there to be an established moral equivalence to the pilgrims and the Syrian refugees, in order to further the notion that the Syrian refugees should be admitted with no questions.
It's the compassionate thing.
Why they are the modern equivalent of our pilgrims.
This is much the same kind of thinking as at Christmas time.
You'll find some liberals say that your average homeless guy is the moral equivalent of Mary and Joseph looking for a hotel.
Mary and Joseph, the original homeless, the parents of Jesus Christ.
Same way here.
So in with this year we have an exception, at least in the Huffington Puffington Post.
They're not going to do an excoriating piece on the pilgrims this year, because instead, they want to use the pilgrims as an example of the Syrian refugees to draw a comparison there so that we will think twice about opposing the mass importation of Syrian refugees.
That's how they twist themselves into knots.
Hang in there, folks.
Back with much more tomorrow.
Yes, sir, we back we are, Rush Limbaugh, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have official Thanksgiving show.
One thing about this Huffing and Puffington Peace story.
I want you to listen to these two paragraphs.
As you prepare for your Thanksgiving day feast, it's worth keeping in mind that the U.S. has a long history of taking in refugees.
And he's talking about the pilgrims here.
Refugees who fled persecution in their home countries.
Now, next paragraph.
And this, this folks, is a hundred percent wrong.
It's what's taught.
When the Mayflower Pilgrims landed in New England, the early 17th century, they established a harvest celebration that would later become known as Thanksgiving by sitting down with Native Americans, gracious enough to share their land and way of life.
And well, we all know how that turned out.
Because the pilgrims then committed genocide against.
I mean, it's just, it's near criminal the way these people have rewritten and maybe don't even understand history in the first place.
That paragraph is 150% wrong.
But he goes on to say today the pilgrims are embodied in the Syrian refugees, which means if you take this guy all the way out to his logic conclusion, the Syrian refugees are going to kill all of us after sitting down and having dinner with us, and they're going to take everything we've got and they're going to mass march all over the country commit genocide and establish this nation as Syria West.
I mean, that's what the guy is saying.
His name is uh what's his name?
Igor Bobick.
Associate politics editor, I guess at the Huffing and Puffington Post, Igor Bopick.
Here's Roy and Gurney, Illinois.
We start on the phones.
Always try to get a phone call in the first hour, open line Friday on Wednesday.
How are you, sir?
I'm fine.
Well, good.
Great to have you here.
Yeah, first time caller.
Uh been listening to you for the last few years.
Thank you very much.
Um, I'm interested in all this stuff about uh conservatives being older people, but I think that's gonna quickly change.
I think there's a group of younger people called the alt-right.
And it started recently in the last few years in Europe because of the Muslim invasion.
And I think it's they're beginning to get people over here, youngsters between 18, 25, 26, to convert to what they call the alt-right.
And it's uh I think it's gonna be pretty intense.
I think you should keep an eye out for it.
Yeah, that's a good thought.
Um the alt-right, like an alternative right.
Alternative right.
Yeah, like an alternative media and so forth.
The ones they dislike are the old hippies and the 68ers, is what it's called in Europe.
That's who they have contempt for, the Marxists.
Well, let me tell you, I don't uh in principle, like you're right.
Now, what what Roy here is responding to uh the Washington Post, New York Times DNC website pieces I read to you, where your average liberal democrat is going to Thanksgiving dinner and is being warned how to deal with the aging kooky, perhaps Alzheimer's stricken conservative crazy aunt or uncle.
And he is assuming that it's a it's a pretty good assumption.
He's making the assumption that the libs think the conservatives are all a bunch of old farts that have lost their minds or on the verge of losing their minds, and they have to be dealt with these right.
There is an entire there's a in fact we don't have to wait for this alt, whatever it is in Europe.
There is a thriving youthful conservative emergence happening in this country.
It may be borrowing from what's going on in Europe.
But Roy, there's no question you're right.
It's growing and it's thriving because the, you know, and the millennials, you know, a significant number of them have been seduced by the left and remain buried there.
But there are a lot of people that don't want to be part of that movement.
It's nothing but depression, it's nothing but doom and gloom.
It's nothing there's but there's no future.
The America's best days are behind us.
There are a lot of young people that don't want to live their lives Or start out their adult lives with that kind of attitude.
It's not going to get anybody anywhere.
And I think if anything is aging, you take a look at the Democrat presidential candidate roster.
If anything is aging in this country, it's a good old Democrat Party.
It isn't us, folks.
Hey, we have some pretty good uh open line Friday on Wednesday callers lined up here.
Remember, you can talk about whatever you want, folks.
That's the beauty of the day.
It doesn't have to be the news of the day, politics, or what have you.
TheHill.com.
I'm debating whether or not to discuss this.
Headline Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite when it comes to Trump, and it's written by a young Rush fan.
Snerdley brought me this.
Couldn't wait to bring me this.
▲
Export Selection