All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 18, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:28
November 18, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Look at this, folks.
The White House has launched another hashtag.
Hashtag refugees welcome.
I'm not, I'm not, I'm not kidding.
From Breitbart, the Obama administration launched a hashtag to promote the concept of welcoming Syrian refugees into America after a growing number of governors proposed halting the program after the terror attacks in Paris.
The White House debuted their hashtag on Facebook last night, refugees welcome.
On the White House website, deputy assistant to the president for Homeland Security, Amy Pope, denounced Republicans for calling to block refugees in the country, she said.
The regime rejects the flawed view that we can't ensure our own safety while also welcoming refugees deperately seeking their own safety.
The truth is America can and must do both.
The last official White House hashtag that I'm aware of was bring back our girls, Michelle Obama's hashtag of the girls kidnapped by Boko Haram.
How'd that work out for him?
I mean, this is it.
See, this is I talked about this yesterday.
Here you go, expressing sympathy and doing nothing.
And getting credit for having a big heart.
No different than wearing a colored ribbon.
I care more than you.
I care, period, and you don't.
I'm a better person than you.
Really?
What are you doing to advance the cause you care about?
I care about it, which is more than you do, I'm a better person than you.
That's why I say liberalism is a gutless choice.
It's the easiest thing in the world to be.
You don't ever have to solve anything.
In fact, the worse things get, the easier it is to be a good liberal.
You just cry a little bit more.
Wring your hands a little bit more.
But I'm gonna tell you, folks, I'm gonna tell you something, right?
This is going to backfire on them.
I think there are a lot of things reaching the tipping point now.
Just like our last caller, Victoria, and I happen to believe her, I don't think she was a seminar caller.
I think she really was what she said she was, a liberal.
But all of these names that the president's calling conservatives over this, she's not buying it.
She's hearing the same names.
Whatever the issue, racist, bigot, segget, uh uh, racist, big, sexist, homophobe, all of those things, and she hears those.
Every liberal hears those allegations on every issue.
And even Victoria and a lot of libs, wait a minute, do we care about the country's security or do we not?
And I really think this is one of many issues cumulatively combined that are going to cause Democrats real trouble down the line.
You know, there's a story out today on Trump's demographic support.
And the the story, it's polling data.
And the the headline of the story is that Trump is cleaning up blue collar workers.
Now, a lot of different ways to interpret blue collar.
Your average political junkie would think union, but I, in this case, think it's something entirely different.
I think blue-collar workers massively supporting Trump actually means people who pay taxes.
Massively supporting Trump.
And I think Trump is indicative of the tipping point that we may be reaching.
I think Trump and his inability to harm himself, no matter what he says, no matter what he does, no matter where he does it, doesn't matter.
He just keeps rising in the polls.
And I think there's a deep message here.
And I think more and more people, low information voters included, are beginning to scratch their heads, okay.
Even low information voters are saying, wait, wait, what why should we be letting all these people in?
I mean, they're committing terrorist acts and Paris blew up and uh why should we be doing this?
And because see, you you have to be totally immersed in politics to be a total supporter of what Obama wants to do here.
This is not the kind of thing your average ordinary American is going to, oh, yeah, yeah.
And if it were, we wouldn't have a problem with illegal immigration.
But the fact that average Americans, a majority of them oppose illegal immigration, Gives us an indication that another majority of Americans doesn't see it the president's way on this or the Democrat Party's way.
And they're beginning to ask questions, and I have proof.
I have poof right here in my formerly nicotine stained fingers.
Mother Jones of all places is warning Democrats, you had better start faking that you are concerned about national security.
Otherwise, we are going to get creamed.
They mean politically.
And by the way, if you're on the hold, hang in there.
We got a lot of great callers on the roster, too.
This is one of those frustrating days.
I'm not going to be able to get to everything I want to do.
But I'm going to try to get to as much and as much in as I can.
Let me give you a pull quote from the Mother Jones article.
Now, Mother Jones, well, Rush, that's not Time Magazine, it's not the New York Times.
Don't care.
It is pop culture liberalism.
From the article, mocking Republicans over this, meaning this Syrian refugee controversy, mocking Republicans over this, as liberals spent much of yesterday doing, seems absurdly out of touch to a lot of people.
Not just wing-nut tea parties either, but plenty of ordinary centrists think this Democrat position is absurd.
It makes them wonder if Democrats seriously see no problem here.
Do they care at all about national security?
Are they really that detached from reality?
This is Mother Jones.
So I think if the Democrats keep on and the Republicans win big in November next year, this is one of the things they're going to look back to as one of the reasons to explain it.
You know, perplexed and curious press, unable to understand how whoever it is wins in a landslide.
God, what happened?
They're going to say, well, we didn't see this.
And somebody, you know, go back to the Syrian refugee crisis.
Take a look at some of the things the president was saying.
That's what this is.
This is a well stone memorial type event happening here.
And these Democrats just are off the charts, and they do make it look like they don't have a single concern for national security at all.
And common sense, no matter your political orientation, common sense dictates a concern over this.
Here's more from the story.
The liberal response to this should be far more measured.
We should support tight screening of the refugees.
Never mind that screening's already pretty tight.
We should highlight the fact that we are accepting a pretty modest number of refugees.
In general, we should act like this is a legitimate thing to be concerned about and then work from there.
Mocking it is the worst thing we could do.
Well, Mother Jones, you may be on to something, but you're going to have to get hold of Josh Ernest or somebody at the White House because the chief mocker is the president.
The president is mocking and he's leading the mocking.
And he's inspiring all of this mocking everywhere else in the Democrat Party.
More Mother Jones.
It validates all the worst stereotypes about liberals, that we put political correctness ahead of national security.
So Mother Jones is saying here that liberals have to pretend to care about national security while they get their way.
Don't misunderstand, and I'm not being fooled here.
Mother Jones is not saying we got to change our opinion on this.
We gotta fake it.
We have got to make it look like we care about national security.
And the way to do that is stop making fun of these wingnuts.
That's their advice.
To all you people on Twitter and all you people on Facebook and the other social media sewers out there, just stop making fun of Republicans over this.
Because if you don't, we're gonna be in trouble.
You've got to act like you care about national security too.
Meanwhile, do everything you can to get every refugee in the country, because we know they're gonna vote Democrat, but aside matter, you gotta fake it.
You gotta fake like you.
You can't make fun of these, but we're gonna be in big, big trouble.
Here's the way they wrap it at Mother Jones.
It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong.
Ordinary people see the refugees as a common sense thing to be concerned about.
We liberals should not respond by essentially calling them idiots.
That way lies electoral disaster.
Mother Jones is right, it's gonna be very tough for this to happen because Obama and Luis Gutierrez and John Kerry, hell, all of them, they think we are idiots.
They think every bitter clinger is an idiot.
They think every devoutly religious Christian is an idiot.
They think every Reaganite conservative is an idiot.
And so it's a big job to fake that you don't think people are idiots.
Let me just put it to you this way.
If there were polling data, it's a hypothetical.
If there were polling data that Islamic refugees voted Republican 80% of the time, they wouldn't be getting into the country.
They wouldn't get near the hemisphere.
They wouldn't get near the ocean.
If the immigrants voted Republican.
Same thing with the illegal immigrants from the southern border.
If they voted Republican, no way.
Would there be at Mad Dash to have them enter the country?
Now, one thing, and then a break, then we get back to the phone calls.
And this goes back to Luis Gutierrez saying that we're about to repeat the same mistakes we made with the Jews and the Japanese in World War II.
And I have a great piece here from National Review Online today by Ian Tuttle.
There are serious, unbigoted reasons to be wary of a flood of Syrian refugees.
And that's the headline.
And by the way, I'll admit there are a lot of comparisons you can make between Nazis and Muslims, but this is not one of them.
But that's not stopping the drive-by's.
It's not just Luis Skutierish.
This whole Jewish card that's being played out here is starting to ramp up, and we need to shut it down.
Among politicians and their clingers on journalists, nothing takes hold like a bad historical analogy.
Thus, as politicians, 29 governors chief among them, call for a halt to Syrian refugee resettlement programs on the grounds that might be exploited as a conduit for terrorists, pundits are invoking the plight of Jewish refugees fleeing Hitler's Germany in an effort to soften Americans' hearts.
The Washington Post, Dana Milbank wrote Monday, this growing cry to turn away people fleeing for their lives brings to mind the SS St. Louis, the ship of Jewish refugees turned away from Florida in 1939.
While his colleague Ishan Thurur contended, today's three-year-old Syrian orphan, it seems, is 1939's German Jewish child.
Over at the Daily Cause, a headline replace Syrian with Jewish, and we're back to 1939.
And this is nonsense on its face.
And it should be obvious from the terms being compared.
We're comparing Jews to Syrians.
Does anybody spot the first analogous error?
Jews are an ethnic group.
Syrians are a national group.
Syrians are from a nation.
Jewish people are ethnic.
And honest apples to apples comparison, if you wanted to do it, would uh would line up German Jews and Syrian Muslims.
But the first and most obvious difference.
There was no international conspiracy of German Jews in the 1930s attempting to carry out daily attacks on civilians on several continents.
The first thing I thought of when I when I saw I read these comparisons, Dana Milbank and others.
The Jews of World War II and that ship, the SS St. Louis that wasn't permitted to land in uh in Miami.
Somehow they what do they have in common with the Syrian refugees?
Absolutely nothing.
German Jews were not terrorists.
In any way, shape, manner, or form.
They were not trying or carrying out daily attacks on civilians in several continents and fleeing capture.
No self-identifying Jews in the early 20th century were randomly massacring European citizens in magazine offices and concert halls.
There was no Jewish state establishing sovereignty over tens of thousands of square miles of territory and publicly slaughtering anyone who opposed its advance.
I mean, there's no comparison to ISIS and Jewish people.
There's no comparison to serious refugees and the Jews that were fleeing Germany.
And yet there's this com and why is the comparison being made?
Don't forget the the reason for the comparison is you have a bunch of liberals looking to find fault yet again with America.
We are the rotten apple.
We are the common denominator bad guy in this.
As far as they are concerned.
We didn't let that ship of Jewish people land in Miami.
We are not letting the Syrian refugees in.
We are reprobates.
We are inhumane.
We're bitter clingers.
We're all just we're rotten people.
No compassion, no hearts.
But the analogy is so flawed, it doesn't hold up, it doesn't make any sense.
And the only reason for the analogy is so these liberals can once again attack this country and this country's majority population.
That's exactly what this is.
Make no mistake about it.
There is no Jewish state today, like there's no like there is an ISIS doing what they're doing, and there wasn't then.
Back in World War One or World War II.
The vast majority of Syrian Muslims are not party to these strains of radicalism and violence, but it would be dangerous to suggest they don't exist.
Or that our refugee resettlement program needed not to take account of them, which is what Obama, the guy, don't worry about it.
We got it handled.
We're vetting them.
They've nothing to vet them against.
Anyway, it's a it's an absurd allegory and analogy and comparison, but remember the the the primary reason for it is so that these people can once again blame America for what's happening here.
That's why I think people need to know who liberals are the minute they spot them, because that's what liberals do.
Back after this.
Okay, people chomping it a bit here to get in on this.
We also have continuing news of the total breakdown of the American university.
We've got a bunch of stories in the stack about that today.
That story is only growing as well, and we need to do some justice on that.
And there are other things from yesterday and today that are unrelated to either of the things we've talked about so far that I want to try to touch on, but before any of that, we back to the phones.
This is Tracy Roswell, Georgia.
Great to have you, and I really appreciate your patience.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Thank you for taking my call.
You know, it's not that we're afraid of three-year-olds, as our president is insisting that we are.
It's that we we know that three-year-olds turned into 10-year-olds, turned into 15-year-olds, 18-year-olds, disaffected, without jobs, just like we're told that the current black youth unemployment is what's causing mayhem and black lives matter.
I mean, uh is an ex-Syrian uh hashtag uh Syrian lives matter.
You know, because we're concerned about the the high unemployment already, and now we're gonna bring in you know, thousands and thousands of refugees and and give them ample opportunity to to compete with Americans for their jobs as they're taught in the come on, compete for jobs, what are you this is gonna be competing for the EBT cards?
Well, exactly.
But at what point do they become disaffected?
You know, there that's not going to be enough.
You know, six hundred dollars a month, I can't live off that.
And they become outraged.
I mean, you know, you can't give away enough money.
Isn't that right?
And I think people that are supposed to be.
No, you're you're Right.
But we don't the the whole thing here breaks down for we don't have the money for any of this, and we haven't had the money for any of what Obama's wanted to do.
Exactly.
Twenty trillion freaking dollars in debt.
Right.
Exactly.
But here, look, did you did you hear the audio soundbites from earlier in the program from a PBS frontline show on ISIS in Afghanistan that I played?
I did not.
Well, I played it right after Obama's soundbite about the Republicans being afraid of three-year-old orphans, and they had a feature on PBS frontline last night about how young Afghanistan Islamist children are taught jihad.
No, I did.
That's my point.
That's why I called.
How to behead, how to kill, how to join.
Exactly.
Your point is the three-year-old orphan becomes an 18-year-old jihadist.
But you but here's the point.
Not because of any disaffection.
He might be raised that way by his family.
That's what this Afghanistan story was on.
That's how they're being raised.
But wait a minute.
Now, did not the brothers in Boston were they not given free rides to college and and and they were refugees.
They were refugees.
They were refugees.
And look what happened to them.
We couldn't were they not happy enough.
Were they not satisfied with the freebies that we gave them?
Not the way to look at it.
See, you're thinking that Jen Arosta can buy them off or change their mind or change their heart.
That's not why they showed up.
They didn't show up to become Americans.
They didn't show up to assimilate.
They didn't show up.
They showed up for other reasons, and there's nothing we could have been nice.
We could have given them Cadillacs or Ferraris or what it wouldn't have, they would have just laughed at us even more.
Tracy, hang on.
There's a couple more points with you.
And we're back with Tracy in Roswell, Georgia here on the EIB network.
Tracy.
Yes.
If I were to tell you that seventy-two percent of the Syrian refugees are men, what would your reaction be?
Well, I know it's it's absolutely true.
I I've seen I've seen the footage of them coming over.
It's frightening.
Yes, it is true.
How do you interpret it?
Uh do you have any questions about it?
No, I in fact I I repost these videos as often as I can on on social media, so informing others, this is the reality.
Well, yeah, but you know, I well, where are their wives?
Well, no, no, no, where are the kids?
I mean, seventy-two percent are men, all seventy-two percent unattached, not fathers, if they are attached and they're either husbands and fathers, where are the wives and children?
Are they still back in Syria?
Why would they leave them?
Why would they seek asylum without them?
That's a big number, 72 percent.
That's a huge number.
I I agree with you.
That's absolutely correct.
And I and it's possible that they are staying back home.
I mean, they're not here permanently.
They're here for their caliphate and then to go home.
Well, uh, I don't know the answer.
Uh uh thing with me is I don't know the answer.
And uh but it's it doesn't make sense to me.
I mean, if we come up with some answers, it's gotta be we could give ourselves multiple choice options, and one of them is gonna be right.
Right.
No, no, you're you're confusing these people with the uh people from our southern hemisphere, Mr. Sni.
Mr. Sterling is saying, no, no, you're missing the point.
They're coming here so they can find jobs and send the money home, and then eventually have you to become citizens and register to vote Democrat, bring the families here.
Uh don't think that's what's going on here.
I don't know what it here's the honest answer, folks.
I look this whole situation.
We would be irresponsible if we weren't exercising caution and suspicion here.
And by the way, by the way, and I don't think this is paranoia in any way, shape, manner, or form, but even if you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
Paranoia does not disqualify whatever reality is out, doesn't cancel it out.
I'm not saying this is paranoia.
I think this is reasoned concern for crying out loud, look what's happening all around us.
And and don't just go back to last week.
Go back to Charlie Ebdu.
Go back to 9 11.
What have you?
Go back to what's happening in Europe.
Put it all together.
It would be irresponsible not to be suspicious of this.
And that's what the Mother Jones point to Democrats is.
You guys are going to blow it for us if you act like there's not even anything remotely possibly bad here.
Why aren't they fighting for their country?
Wait a second, wait a second, that's a legitimate question.
I know you're trying to make a crack a little joke and make a point here, but it's a legitimate question.
Why aren't they fighting for their country?
Why aren't they staying home and fighting ISIS instead of fleeing?
That's not what we've done.
Why don't they fight Assad for whatever?
No, it's a legitimate question unless they are fighting for their country by coming here.
It's a valid concern.
It is not paranoia, it's not bigotry.
It is none of these, and the very fact that in even in this instance, the Democrat Party cannot wait to blame Americans.
This is the takeaway you have to have here, folks.
You know, analyze whatever the specifics are in this refugee situation or the aftermath to the attacks in Paris on Friday.
The real energy the Democrats have is when they criticize Americans.
I mean, they come to life.
They're jazzed, they're excited.
They get to blame America again, specifically certain kinds of Americans.
So all of this, just yet another opportunity for liberals to point out what a bunch of reprobates their political opponents are.
Never let a crisis go to waste.
This is a crisis that the Democrat Party is attempting to manipulate to its political benefit and a hell with whatever else it means for anybody else in the country or the world.
So anyway, Tracy, I appreciate the call.
Thanks very much.
Hear what Vladimir Putin said.
Vladimir Putin said to forgive the terrorists is up to God, but to send them to him, that's up to me.
And I've been thinking about a Putin Trump alliance in the world of wondering what that would look like.
Can you imagine that?
Oh, can you imagine how that would just paralyze the Washington establishment?
Putin told the Russian media, we're going to pursue terrorists everywhere.
If they're in the airport, we're going to pursue them in the airport.
And if we capture them in the toilet, then we will waste them in the outhouse.
The issue has been resolved once and for all.
Now, don't misunderstand.
Nobody here is saying Putin is a good guy.
Okay.
But he is going to defend his country.
He's going to rally his countrymen to oppose these people.
He may have terrorists of his own that do dirty things against the Ukrainians and Chechens and so forth.
But when he has enemies acting against him, he's not out there blaming the Vladivostoks.
He's blaming them.
You don't hear Putin attacking his own country in the midst of all this.
You don't hear Putin laughing and mocking and making fun of his own people and all of this.
And you didn't hear Francois Hollande doing that.
You didn't hear the French president addressing his Congress, laughing at, mocking, impugning, ridiculing other French citizens like our president is doing.
The New York Post today, Obama rejects Francis Call to ramp up the war against ISIS.
Thank you.
Francois Hollande on Monday called for America and Russia to join his country in an all-out war against ISIS.
But Obama expressed a much less aggressive stance and said putting more U.S. troops on the ground would be a mistake.
Olan said, I will call both Obama and Putin to unite our efforts and seek a solution.
But Obama flatly rejected it.
slap in the face, right after the slaughter in Paris.
And John Kerry, who served in Vietnam.
Oh, before before I get to that.
Another teachable moment in journalism.
Here is a story.
Reuters reporterette by the name of Ese Takzebe.
And I have no idea if I'm pronouncing that right.
He spells her name ECE.
So it could be East, could be Essie, could be EJ.
Who knows?
But there's a picture of us why I know it's a female.
Turkish fans booed during the minutes silence for the victims of the Paris attacks before their national team drew zero to zero with Greece in a friendly international soccer game on Tuesday.
The mark of respect was observed at matches across Europe, including at Wembley, where France faced England after Islamic State militants struck Paris on Friday, killing 129 people.
She's leaving out something that she saw.
You're nodding your head like you know what.
You heard about this.
Now this is serious, folks.
This woman not only saw some things at the soccer match she attended, she tweeted about them, but she left them out of her story for everybody else.
What happened that she didn't report during the moment of silence.
If you watched an NFL game or a hockey game or an NBA, any game over the weekend, there was a moment of silence for the victims Friday night.
And that was pretty much uniform around the world.
In Istanbul, which is in Turkey, the fans chanted Allahu Akbar during the moment of silence.
And this babe at Reuters tweeted it.
Istanbul fans boo, minute of silence, for Paris attacks chant Allahu Akbar before Turkey versus Greece soccer match.
...
But in her story, after she had tweeted this, she left out that part of the story.
So if you only know about this for reading Reuters, you would never know.
You would not know what the fans, I don't know how many of them was, it was a good number, shouted Allahu Akbar during the moment of silence.
It's just, I don't know if she I don't know if she was forced to add it later.
Uh but the first report that she had did not mention it.
How do you leave that out?
How in the world do you I'll tell you how I leave it out?
Because you don't want him to look bad.
You're trying to protect ISIS and their related devotees.
That's how.
And John Kerry.
In the last days, obviously, that has been particularly put to the test.
There's something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, as he pronounced actually Charlie Bdu, but we'll pronounce it the Anglicized way.
John Kerry said there's something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, and I think everybody would feel that.
There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of Well, not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they're really angry because of this and that.
But this Friday incident was absolutely indiscriminate.
John Kerry actually said of the Charlie Hebdo incident.
Well, there was a legitimacy to that.
The Islamists were mad that Charlie Ebdo had made fun of him by running Pictures of cartoons and stuff.
Well, you can see maybe none of legitimacy, but there's a rationale to that.
So John Kerry sees a rationale, a legitimacy to an act of terror.
One he can understand.
Because he is superior European developed intellect and speaks French.
Now the vote to confirm John Kerry as Secretary of State was 94 to 3.
There were three Republicans who voted against John Kerry.
I would ask you to take a guess, but I don't have the time.
They were Senator Jim Inhofe, Republican Oklahoma.
Senator John Cornyn, Republican Texas, and Senator Ted Cruz, Republican Texas.
It's our Secretary of State.
Well, you see, there's a rationale.
Legitimacy.
Well, maybe not a legitimate rationale.
That's totally a discriminate.
We can't tolerate that.
Here we go back to the phones, and it's Bob in Coronado Island, California.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Russ.
Um, how can we trust our government to properly vet the Syrian refugees?
When we look at our government's track record last summer on the southern border, they literally lost track of thousands of people who were who failed to self-report.
Uh they allowed uh sanctuary cities to be formed and uh allowed felonies to be uh ignored.
I mean, I think this is gonna fail.
It'll fail very predictably, and uh the fallout's unimaginable.
It's designed to fail.
You know, this is you're Bob actually right on the money here, all of these kids flooding the country.
We can't find the 11 million in the shadows.
Uh and yet all the evidence that we have suggest the government's incompetent and incapable of anything like this.
And yet, when we question their ability to do it right with these refugees, we're laughed at, we're mocked, we're made fun of.
The left unites in starting to criticize their own country and their own citizens when in fact they don't have a leg of competence to even stand on here in this.
You're entirely correct.
The responsible thing to do is to be suspicious.
The responsible thing to do is doubt the federal government, and not only their ability, but what they're saying about it.
They have lied to us countless times before, and there's no evidence to reason to suggest that they're not lying to us here.
So you're absolutely right, but they're trying to portray attitudes like yours as dangerously jingoistic, nationalistic, xenophobic, racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic, and too many other Americans agree with you, and that's a problem.
And that's what, again, just to close the loop, a bunch of Democrats are starting to worry now that this is all over the top, that uh way many more than just Republicans are suspicious of this.
Rush, I think the tipping point might have been reached a couple days earlier.
I mean, I literally was shocked when uh Bernie Sanders comment that global warm or uh climate change is directly related to terrorism a day after those attacks.
And I can't believe he wasn't shouted down by the audience or by the uh the other two people on the stage.
Well I mean, that's a joke.
I mean, that is I I can't we're supposed to accept that as fact.
I mean, to me, that was uh Republicans are gonna have a nice landslide.
Well, you would hope, but I have to tell you on that, you obviously would uh be shocked.
Bernie Sanders nowhere near the first person to say this.
This has been a Democrat refrain for years.
They added this, they added terrorism to their global warming refrain a couple three years ago.
This is nothing new.
May just be the first time you've heard it, but you'd be stunned at the number of run of the mill, average, ordinary everyday Democrats who believe that.
You have a Democrats running around our number one threat pausing the world today, facing the world today is climate change.
You'd be amazed at the number of young intellectuals, young journalists, tech bloggers, you name it all over the country, Hollywood people who Literally think that's true.
It's not, it's not an oddball position on the left.
Oddball defined as uh a view held by a very tiny few.
That view is pretty widely held.
That global warming is the biggest threat.
Obama goes out and says so.
Obama said so last week or two weeks ago.
The president says it, and they believe everything he says.
Now, average ordinary Americans, I think it they laugh so forth, but we're more incredulous like you are that it's not left out of the arena whenever it's stated.
But there's a reason, psychological reason why they believe it.
It gives them comfort.
That belief that global warming is the single greatest threat we face.
That that makes all these people who believe that think their lives will have meaning because they think there's something they can do and support that will stop it.
And that's why it's so successful with this bunch of Nimrods.
Breitbart surveyed it 22 times.
Obama has declared climate change a greater threat than terrorism.
Twenty-two different times.
So it's old news, your average ordinary run of the mill Democrat.
▲
Export Selection