All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:17
November 16, 2015, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, no, it's really very simple.
If you were looking for the United States, if you were looking for the President of the United States to say we are not going to tolerate this kind of behavior.
If you were looking for the President of the United States to say we are going to go to the end of the earth to find these people and take them out and do everything we can to wipe out the kind of terrorism taking place, this was not the speech for you.
If you were looking for the President of the United States to provide the world confidence and leadership that ISIS and other groups like it could be dealt with and taken out, this was not the speech for you because none of that was said.
There wasn't even an attitude that conveyed those thoughts.
And as I said, at the same time Obama was.
You know the only time Obama came alive during his speech today?
Did you watch any of it?
The only time he came alive.
The only time Obama got passionate was when what?
When he started talking about the migrants, when he started talking about the migrants and how we must keep our doors open.
And he started condemning people who think we need to keep Syrian refugees out of here.
We need to keep Muslim refugees out of here.
We only should let in Christians.
He blew up.
He got passionate.
He took out after Republicans, Republican presidential candidates.
He was tougher and more critical on Republicans than he was on ISIS in this speech.
But it was clear.
Folks, does anybody doubt that we're in a war?
That we've been in a war since before 9-11.
We have been in a war with the Islamists.
Hell, you could think that the Thomas Jefferson days.
But in the modern era, the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, we have been at war.
There have been repeated terrorism attacks, hijackings, you name it.
We have been at war.
And way too many administrations have sought to ignore it and look the other way and downplay it, including the Clinton administration, including the Obama regime.
You name it, look the other way, it isn't happening because in no way, shape, manner, or form were they prepared to take any of the responsibility of dealing with it, much less acknowledge they had anything to do with it.
Clinton had everything to do with it by making us look like a phony paper tiger.
By cutting and running out of uh Somalia, Black Hawk Down incident, any number of historical events I could give you.
But the fact of the matter is that we have made it clear we can be had.
And after 9-11, what do we do?
From the highest levels of the State Department, we started conducting seminars asking, what's wrong with us?
What did we do?
Why did we make them cement?
What have we done to so infuriate them?
We took it all on ourselves.
It was our fault.
College kids today have picked up that refrain in the terms of political correctness.
It must be something we've done to offend them.
We've got to find out what it is and assure them we mean them no harm.
But if you were looking for tough leadership, if you were looking for a president, make it clear that he's going to defend his country and other Western civilization countries, Western democracies, if you were hoping you're going to get a president who was looking the world in the eye and saying that they were not going to be able to continue with this, this was not the speech for you because you didn't get that.
What you got from this president was you're a bigot if you think we should stop helping these refugees.
He wants a hundred thousand a year.
And he, I'll guarantee you this too.
Whether there whether Congress defunds the whole program, don't bet on that.
He's going to do it anyway.
Folks, this last year coming up, I'm telling you, I don't think people still have any idea what's going to go on.
One year to go, one year to fully transform this country, one year to do whatever he has in mind, vis-a-vis the United States of America.
One year.
If he wants to keep those borders open and he wants, you know, the southern border immigration is a much different thing than taking in these refugees.
Don't equate the two.
They're two separate entities.
They've got different objectives.
Illegal immigration is one thing.
We already have a set of laws on the books, all we'd have to do is enforce them, but nobody wants to, we're not doing so.
But the Southern border immigration problem is not at all similar to what Obama's doing with the expanded refugee importation program.
But you will hear he just comes alive when admonishing the bigots in this country.
And he even went so far as to say you've got people who think it's okay to let it in the Christians, but but they don't want the most simple.
That's not who we are.
That's not American value.
That's not the American.
That's not the values of weep.
Blows his stack, practically.
I want to give you the audio sound right before we get to Obama.
I mentioned this, and I want you to hear it.
It's Hillary Clinton, December 3rd, 2014, Georgetown University.
Foreign policy press conference.
This is the place that only barely half full.
And this is what Hillary said, the portion of her remarks is how she defines smart power and what it would be, how she would use it were she president.
This is what we call smart power, using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security, leaving no one on the sidelines, showing respect even for one's enemies, trying to understand and insofar as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view, helping to define the problems, determine the solutions.
That is what we believe in the 21st century will change.
Change the prospects for peace.
That's Hillary Clinton almost a year ago explaining smart power.
Every possible tool to advance peace and security.
Of course, none of this applies when talking about Republicans or conservatives.
As far as they are concerned, we will not be interested in their perspective or their point of view.
And we will not help to understand and define their problems and look for solutions.
No, we're only talking about Islamists here.
That's essentially what she's saying.
Now to the Obama sound bites from his speech today.
Right off the bat, this is Obama.
And his coming alive, this is the most energetic and passionate he was during the whole thing, by saying rejecting refugees.
This is after what happened in Paris.
Rejecting refugees would be a betrayal of our values.
As we accept more refugees, including Syrians.
We do so only after subjecting them to rigorous screening and security checks.
We also have to remember that many of these refugees are the victims of terrorism themselves.
That's what they're fleeing.
Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values.
Right.
Now, this is a theme, by the way, that's being picked up by the international left.
And I've seen it in a number of leftist websites publications, and that is, come on!
The refugees are not the terrorists.
The refugees are fleeing what happened in Paris.
They're not the people causing it when we have discovered that one of the terrorists in Paris on Friday night was indeed carrying a Syrian passport.
Now we think that's the case.
It could have been one of the victims.
It could have been a forged passport or what have you.
But nevertheless, it was found.
But the bottom line is with all of this happening, with all of these young men, able-bodied military age fleeing Bernie Sanders says because it's hot where they leave to live because of climate change.
Obama says, oh, yeah, we'll check them out.
Really?
Who has confidence that we're going to do that?
We can't even find the illegals in this country, supposedly.
What do you mean we're going to check them out?
How many Fort Hoods is it going to take?
How many one-off terrorism acts, attempted terrorism acts by lone wolves or whatever in this country isn't going to take?
Why in the world would you want to commit suicide?
This is what people don't understand.
Reasonable people who are not politically shall I say they don't define themselves politically.
These are the people I'm talking about, I wish we could teach to spot liberalism everywhere it is.
We would be so far ahead of the game.
But people that don't want to think they're watching politics, don't want to see politics, don't want to think politics is part of anything.
Even they are beginning to say, wait a minute, we just had another ISIS attack.
They're beheading people left and right, they're making videos of it, they're killing people left and right, people are fleeing everywhere.
We want to let people into this country during period of time like this.
Why would we commit suicide?
Why would America take the risk?
Even non-political people are beginning to ask the question.
Like what I heard today, driving into work.
I'm it might be the worst time in the world for my kids to be growing up, you know, and flabbergasted listening to this.
It's talking about the Paris attack.
And they're worried they were talking about sleeper cells here and how many might be uh planning attacks here in the United States.
You guys notice what's happening to the economy?
Have you guys noticed?
They hadn't.
It's asking empty questions.
That's what I mean.
Fort Hood was not workplace violence.
Well, I know they said it was.
That's why people don't trust them now.
They're asking us to not believe exactly what we see.
They're asking us to deny common sense.
They're asking us to deny what's rational.
They want us to believe them.
That's workplace violence.
Really?
Allah walkbar.
Workplace violence.
Yeah, it happens every day.
Snerdley shouts it have every other day this uh last week.
Allah walkbar.
Got mad at his computer.
Yep, it's happened.
It's common.
Right, workplace violence.
Okay, so there's Obama making the case is in Turkey.
We can't shut down the refugees.
We gotta let them in.
That's who we are.
That's how we open them up.
And this is when Obama's critics are bellicose and they pop off with tough talk.
This is Obama tougher on Republicans than he ever is on ISIS.
This is a press conference at the G20 summit and White House correspondent Jim Abelow.
Mr. President, if I could ask, I'd like you to address your critics who say your reluctance to enter another Middle East war and your preference of diplomacy over using the military makes the U.S. weaker and emboldens our enemies.
Some of them seem to think that if I were just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing, that that would make a difference, because that seems to be the only thing that they're doing is talking as if they're tough.
Folks want to pop off and have opinions about uh what they think they would do?
Present a specific plan.
What I'm not interested in doing is posing or pursuing some notion of American leadership or America winning or whatever other slogans they come up with that has no relationship to what is actually going to work to protect the American people and to protect people in the region.
Did I just hear what I just heard?
Did I did we all just hear that?
That did he just say that he's not going to pursue some notion, he's not interested in pursuing some notion of uh American leadership, or of America winning, or whatever other slogans they come up with.
It has no relationship to what's actually going to work.
If America winning doesn't have any relationship to what's going to work, then what the hell are we working on?
What's the point?
This is not the first time he has said this.
This is not the first time he has questioned the whole concept of America winning as a phony premise.
Gosh, I wish I could remember it.
It seems like it was early on in the first term.
It might have been about Iraq.
But there's something about this is the second, maybe the third time I have heard Obama denigrate the concept of America winning as somehow insignificant or beneath us intellectually.
Then it's just a slogan.
America winning is just a slogan.
And what I guess is real is all these hashtags.
Bring back our girls.
Let's drop some candles here for the victims of whatever happened and think we're doing something.
That's what people on his side do.
But he really makes the case here, makes the point here that it's it's this is this is bitl bitter clinger rabble rousing.
It's just insignificant.
This this idea of America winning, it's so backwards.
We intellectuals are so far beyond that.
The concept of America winning, that's not what this is about.
We're not in this to win.
That's not what that's not why we're doing what we're doing.
That's his point of view here.
American leadership, American winning.
Other slogans we can come up with.
I'm not interested in that.
That is no relationship to what's actually going to work to protect the American people.
America winning has no relationship to protecting the American people.
This is arrogant condescension.
And I'm the whole idea here about winning and victory in intellectuals in their world.
That is that's blue-collar stuff.
That's Hayseed Hicks stuff, talking about winning and this and that.
That's the intellectuals know there is no winning.
There's just containment.
There's appeasement, there's cooperation, they're coalition.
Winning?
Come on.
Don't waste my time.
We're so beyond winning.
In his vaunted world of superior intelligence and being winning is such a passe thing.
Leadership is so irrelevant to the real world today.
But he wasn't finished.
He then lectured everybody on how we have to accept Muslims as well as Christians, or we're all just a bunch of bigots.
When I hear folks say that, well, maybe we should just admit the Christians, but not the Muslims.
When I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person who's fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefited from protection when they were fleeing political persecution?
That's shameful.
That's not American.
That's not who we are.
We don't have religious tests to our compassion.
You know, it's a common line that Obama uses all the time to make everybody think he's an American traditionalist.
Now, whatever is, he's not an American traditionalist.
By that I mean traditional American values.
He abhors them.
They're old, they're out of date, they're they were never that good anyway.
But when he comes out, that's not America.
That's not who we are.
That's Obama trying to make you think that he thinks like you do.
But he doesn't, folks.
By the way, can any anybody tell me who is it?
He says political leaders suggesting that uh there should be a religious test for these refugees.
We should admit the Christians, not the Muslims.
Who said that?
Do you know anybody who said it?
Well, I can't think of anybody has.
Um, and and then he says some of these folks themselves come from families who benefited from protection when they were fleeing political persecution.
Who's he talking about?
You know, I wish he would name names when he starts alleging all of this bigots are out there.
I want to know who he's talking about.
But I'll guarantee you this the low information crowd in the Democrat Party thinks he's talking about Republicans.
And that's the whole purpose of the comment.
But he won't name names.
All these imaginary bigots out there.
That's not America.
That's not who we are.
Really?
We aren't who we are the last seven years, if you ask me.
We are not who we are.
We've been doing things not the way we normally do them the last seven years, if you ask me.
Here's Bill in uh in Phalan, California, as we head back to the phones.
Great to have you, sir.
Hi.
Yeah, good afternoon, Rush.
It's a pleasure to talk to you again.
You bet.
Uh this touches exactly on two points that you made in the last hour and what you're talking about right now.
Number one, where have these people been before last Friday?
Number two, people wanting to insert themselves into the story.
Uh Friday, I was surfing around television dials, and I happened on to my local Fox uh station in Los Angeles, and Shepard Smith was giving commentary while the hostages were still being held in the theater and there were still bombs going off in the theater.
He actually said that this is an unprecedented event since World War II, and he says this is not just a case of some people hijacking some planes and flying them into buildings.
This is an unprecedented choreographed attack of seven locations in Paris.
And I'm sitting there, my jaw dropped Rush, and I'm going, what the hell was 9 1 1?
They've even got the press conditioned with this Obama administration that that 911 was maybe our fault, or it's something to be played down, and what was happening in Paris was the most horrible thing since World War II, since 1944.
I was absolutely flabbergasted, and his delivery was amateurish.
It was uh more like an actor trying to do it for a bad movie where something like that is happening, and they had him as a talking head in the corner of the screen while they were given the live feed.
Therefore, he was inserting himself from a remote remote.
Hang on a minute.
I've got to take a break here, uh, Bill, and we've got the uh break coming up here, and there's one other thing you wanted to address, so we'll do that when we get back.
Okay, I have been informed that Obama was probably referring to Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz, because uh apparently Jeb Bush and Cruz suggested that Muslim refugees from Syria not be admitted to the U.S. right now, refugees.
And Rubio has said that we shouldn't take in any Syrian refugees.
Uh and well, that's fine.
I don't mind missing that.
I must have missed that Friday night.
I was uh just missing things Friday night.
No big deal.
Uh fact of the matter is that Obama, that's what jazzed him.
Obama got more irritated at those guys than he is at ISIS.
Now, before you people go off half-cocked out there, I'm just telling you, that's how he sounded.
In this press conference today, Obama got animated, he got passionate, energetic when talking about that.
When talking about ISIS, it was what's the word for it?
It was it was impersonal, it was detached.
It was as though he was he was talking uh theory and and philosophy in the faculty lounge.
He wasn't talking about specifics, and there was no condemnation to speak of of ISIS.
There was an acknowledgement that they're bad guys, but there was no condemnation, not like there was condemnation of these Republicans who think it would be wise to keep Syrian refugees out of America right now.
What do you think, folks?
Given what's happening, given what we see happening in Europe, Europe is being overrun.
And there are a lot of people in Europe who are starting to wake up to the idea that this is not just a natural flow of people fleeing poverty or war or global warming heat or whatever, that it is part of a plan.
People in Europe, because it's so massive, because of the demands these refugees are making, because of the demographics of the refugees.
Even some wuss Europeans are beginning to get suspicious.
To me, this is just a common sense.
We are at war.
We have a terror group which is much more violent than Al Qaeda, which we seem totally vexed by.
If you listen to our own president, we're vexed about how to deal with them.
They were the JV team, and last Friday We had them contained.
Obama, even today said that despite this incident, they're on the run.
Did you hear him say he said that those are not his exact words, but despite this incident that happened, we still have the upper hand with these people.
And we don't.
But you couple what's happening the southern border with endless illegal immigration sponsored by the Democrat Party.
Well, can't leave the Republicans out of that one either.
This country's being flooded and overrun.
And forget the religion, forget terror.
How about the U.S. economy?
How much does our compassion cost?
We are $19 trillion in debt.
We don't have the money for all of this compassion.
You know, that's the thing that nobody is talking about here, except on our side.
We continue to import all these people wherever they come from, the southern border, or war-torn refugees from wherever in the Middle East.
They're incapable of providing for themselves.
We're settling them and locating them.
And by the way, Syrian refugees are already here in overwhelming numbers, and they're in practically every major city in the country.
I have a graphic that I printed that I could show you on the ditto cam.
I'm not how I'm not sure how well it would show up, though.
It's whoever put the graphic together used very light shades of um, well, I would say ink.
Let me show it to you.
Let me I'm gonna turn the ditto cam off here, what I just did, and I'm gonna zoom in here so that when I show it to you.
Yeah, that'll work.
Okay, what you're gonna see when I turn the ditto cam back on is where Syrian refugees were placed.
What you're not gonna be able to see probably is the outline of the United States.
The Continental 48, it's very, very faint here.
So imagine that you are looking at the continental United States with New York and the Northeast and the uh you know the upper right-hand corner, and LA in the lower left-hand corner, and Florida, Miami in lower right hand corner, and Seattle, upper left, and you will see this is where Syrian refugees have been placed.
The size of the circle matters.
The bigger the circle, the more refugees.
And in every major city here, folks, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, Seattle, New York, Washington, Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville, Atlanta, St. Louis, Lull, Memphis, Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth here.
Let me show you to you here.
And there you go.
That's where Syrian refugees already have been placed in the country.
Now we'll grab a screenshot of this and put it up on the ditto cam, and I'll send the graphic up to Coco so we can get a clean version of this up on the website so that you can see it.
Ditto cam coming off now, I'm not to reposition it.
But given what we know, just the common sense aspect of this, and what we see happening in Europe and the demands being made and the events taking place, is it common sense?
What is what about the American value of self-preservation?
What about the Constitution?
What up the oath of office, defend and protect the people of the United States?
What?
You know, the president wants to provide all kinds of leadership in terms of our welfare state, but he does not want to provide leadership in vanquishing our enemies.
So it seems to me.
If you want to come here and become a freeloader for the Democrat Party, the doors are open.
Wherever you are in the world, and the more dependent you are, the less capable of providing for yourself, the better.
But when it comes to leadership around the world vanquishing enemies of free people, United States doesn't seem to be the eager to get on that battlefield.
The United States doesn't seem to think that it's our responsibility anymore, even to ourselves, much less our allies.
Now, Bill from Phelan, California dropped off.
Oh, you do have him back.
Okay, Bill's back.
Is he is he ready to go now?
All right, here we go.
Bill, you're welcome back.
There you go.
Okay, Bill, you're back.
Now you you you mentioned there were two things I talked about in the previous hour.
You addressed the first one.
I've forgotten the second one that you said you wanted to address.
Uh the the second one, Rush, was people trying to insert themselves into the story, and this includes the journalists that are remotely located from the actual event, but they try and stick themselves down like they're actually there reporting on it.
Exactly.
And this is what Shepard Smith was doing just before the break.
I was starting to say that they had Shepherd inserted in a very large picture up in the corner of the screen as a talking head while the events were still going on in Paris in the theater when you hear the bombs going off and the shooting and everything.
And he's there with a very, very stern look on his face, doing performance art, basically.
You could tell that the performance was phony, it was stilted.
He was making more of an effort to see that he's going to get his journalism Emmy or his press club award or something than to actually report the events.
Well, did did repeat to me what Shepard said when you heard Shepard say that this was not just a bunch of guys flying airplanes into buildings?
Okay, I'll try and repeat it the way he did it too.
He was very melodramatic, and he says, ladies and gentlemen, this is an unprecedented event.
Nothing like this has happened in the history of the world in Paris, not since World War II.
Ladies and gentlemen, let me make it clear that this is not just a matter of some guys hijacking some planes and flying them into a building.
This is an unprecedented choreographed orchestrated event, seven locations we're hearing reports of so far.
And he went into this big you know, to do about the whole thing.
And could it be that Shepard was talking about France?
That this was in this in nothing like this has been seen in France since World War II.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
He was talking about France, but what I mean rush is he was totally upplaying the importance of France and totally downplaying what happened in 911.
Almost like we deserved it, or that it's such past history right now, you know, it's nothing anymore.
It's just a bunch of guys that hijacked some planes and flew them into some buildings, he said, or words to that effect.
Why would you want to do that?
Why why would you want to downplay 9-11 while talking about what happening uh happened in Paris?
Well, it's simple.
I got the distinct impression.
Number one, he was trying to get some sort of an award.
He was more concerned with inserting himself into the story, and maybe he wasn't as involved back then when it happened.
He was involved now.
This was his moment now.
And the other thing was Oh, you mean like 9-11 wasn't a big deal because he wasn't there to cover it?
Yeah, well, he might have been there, but maybe he was a younger journalist and didn't have as much involvement back then.
Oh, wow.
Well, that's you're you're you Bill, in all fairness here, you're you're interpreting a lot there from uh from old Shep's attitude and so forth.
Uh that's I would have to see this.
Uh and I'm not not to doubt you, uh, Bill, but uh it's that's awfully strange to just regard 9-11.
It's not just a bunch of guys flying jets in a building.
That was one thing.
This now, this is terrorism.
I would have to see that.
That was a tough one to a tough one to believe.
I mean, even if even if the late Peter Jennings were doing it, uh that that would be uh tough one to uh to believe.
Uh now, but Shepherd Shepard Smith did say we did read this earlier.
That Shepard Smith did say that because of the Paris attacks, the world had changed forever.
The world had changed forever.
Now, now let's assume he means that.
So I've I think it's interesting exercise to try to find out how people think.
How do you take 9-11 with 3,000 people dead in a unique attack?
Our own airplanes were hijacked and used against us.
We taught the hijackers how to do that in our own flight schools.
We had the proper intel, but was we were not able to use it because of a wall as the Clinton administration had built, and so the CIA, the FBI could not share intelligence data.
3,000 people dead, our own airplanes.
How do you relegate that to a hoe Hummer and then say that 129 people dead in Paris changes the world forever?
I mean, I think Hitler changed the world forever.
World War II changed the world forever.
And had we lost World War II, I don't even want to contemplate.
But I think that is modern day newscast 101.
I mean, just when there's no breaking news, you're on a crawl that says breaking news.
When there's nothing new the last 20 minutes, you put up alert.
You know, everything's breaking, everything's now, everything's immediate, everything's a crisis.
Nothing happened moments ago until what we got to tell you now just happened, even though you heard it two days ago.
There's obviously some broadcast technique in this.
But if he really meant it?
If if what happened in Paris means the world changed forever.
Hey, folks, I have to tell you, these two clowns that I heard, it doesn't matter who they are, it doesn't matter, just average ordinary guys.
These two clowns, all of a sudden, after everything, what happened in Paris makes them worried for their kids' future.
Not 9-11.
They didn't say 9-11 did.
They didn't say any of the domestic things here.
What happened in Paris?
They finally realized the world is a different place now.
That kind of thinking fascinated, because those people vote, they elect Democrats.
The reason all of this is happening, or that so much of it is happening is because we've got Democrats who are incompetent, who have a different view of American leadership.
Running the show for the last seven years.
All of this stuff does matter.
Not to mention the domestic disasters that have been brought upon us.
You're guiding light.
Times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos.
Mother of Paris suicide bomber says her son did not mean to kill anyone.
She claims he may have blown himself up because of stress.
Name is Ibrahim Abdeslam or Abdislam.
Blew himself up in the attack outside the uh cafe.
He was one of three brothers said to be at the heart of the ISIS terror cell.
The family has since claimed that Ibrahim 31 may have been stressed.
Stressed.
What U.S. college did he attend?
Well, keep telling us that they're stressed out on campus, that they're worried, that they're feeling unsafe, and so forth.
Just asking.
Obama advisor, President Obama still plans to allow 10,000 Syrian refugees into the country over the next year despite the terrorist attacks in Paris.
This is Ben Rhodes, the national deputy national security advisor.
Yeah, we had very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.
That's a blatant lie, by the way.
Peter King, Congressman Peter King of New York, rebuffed the regime's claim that there are robust vetting procedures in place.
He was on Fox News Sunday.
He said, I was listening to Ben Rhodes and what he just said about this robust vetting of refugees is untrue.
There's virtually no vetting.
There aren't any databases in Syria, no government records.
We don't know who these people are.
And that makes all the sense in the world.
What are we vetting them against?
Okay, here is Amir Sahib Skyhook.
He wants into the country.
Wait a minute, Amir, we're gonna check you out.
Well, very good, you took me out, but there are no records of me anyway.
I come from Syria, everything has been blown up, there is no government building that ain't even what are they with no records of me?
And he's probably right.
Where do we go to find out who's Amir Sahib Skyhook is?
Why am I in trouble?
I just did an impersonation for crying out.
What am I in trouble for?
Amir Sahib Skyhook.
Oh, come on, that's just a takeoff on Karim of Jules.
Anyway, here's Ted Cruz.
This is Ted Cruz, we got the audio sound bites, Fox News set.
You really am in trouble over that?
Come, a little bit over what?
The name or the impersonation?
I was uh I'm not mocking anything.
I'm just illustrating the point.
Peter King says there aren't any records in Syria of who these migrants are.
These vagrants are.
I mean, uh the the uh refugees are.
How can we vet them?
Is there is there a hall of records in Damascus?
And is there a record there for Amir Sahib Sky Hooker?
Pick whoever you want, so that we can verify who he is based on what he's telling us.
That's all Peter King's point is.
Anyway, here's Krisvrick's Saturday Fox and Friends.
I recognize that Barack Obama does not wish to defend the.
Nope, nope, nope.
Wrong soundbite, wrong soundbite.
We gotta take a break.
We're out of time for this segment.
It was only 13.
It was number 28.
We'll get to it when we come back.
Don't go away.
Okay, other things going on out there.
There's still some some crazy stuff going on on the campuses out there in a Democrat debate Saturday night.
And some of the some of the candidates are getting ticked off at Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz or putting them on Saturday night at a record low audience for a debate.
Eight and a half million people.
They ought to be thankful that nobody saw that debate.
▲
Export Selection