All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 30, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:50
October 30, 2015, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
I am your guiding light.
The bad times, the good times.
El Rushbo here on Friday behind the Golden EIB microphone.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
And that's it, folks.
We got one big exciting hour remaining.
And as you've heard, whatever anybody wants to talk about when we go to the phones, fine with me.
We haven't had any World Series calls, but that's okay.
I mean, I've just missed an example of things you can talk.
It doesn't have to be politics if you don't want to be talking about politics.
That's what Friday is all about.
It can be anything.
So speaking of, we do have game three of the World Series tonight.
Back in New York, Royals and Mets.
And a moderately good slate of games on Sunday.
I actually have two games on Sunday that are big.
They got the Cincinnati Bengals at Pittsburgh for the Steelers.
Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers, undefeated teams.
You know, there's never been in the history of the NFL, you've never had this many undefeated teams this late in the season.
And it's going to blow up Sunday night unless there's a tie.
We have the Broncos at Green Bay.
Peyton Manning has only faced Aaron Rodgers one time in both their careers, seven years ago.
The Indianapolis Colts were in Green Bay.
I was there for that game.
The Green Bay Packers.
It was Aaron Rodgers' first season, game six or seven, taking over for Brett Favre.
And it was, I think, 34 to 14, the Packers won.
When I was a guest at the game, that is seven years ago.
And so now we've got the Broncos and Packers undefeated on Sunday night football with Al Michaels and Chris Collinsworth.
And then the Steelers and the Bengals at 1 o'clock on Sunday.
And I've decided I'm playing golf Sunday.
I am.
I'm playing golf Sunday.
I would normally stay home and I'd watch the Steelers game, but I'm going to go play golf.
One of the reasons is I'm playing so damn well.
I'm hitting the ball so darn.
I mean, just boom.
And once you, you know, when you play it well, you want to keep playing.
So I'm going to keep playing.
And I can watch the game from the golf course if it gets good.
And it might because it's Rollsberger's first game back after the knee injury.
Just take the iPad out there, put the NFL Sunday ticket on, and bamo.
If it gets good.
Otherwise, just keep track of the track of the score.
Royals up two games to none in the World Series.
Again, game three tonight in New York on Fox.
Now, the budget deal railed against this budget deal earlier in the week.
And I made a point about it that a lot of people were curious about.
I got a lot of email.
I said this budget deal basically elects Hillary Clinton president.
And it was a bit of an exaggerated, but I want an exaggeration.
I wanted to make the point.
And people said, what do you mean?
Why does this budget deal elect Hillary?
I said, the primary thing this budget, it's a two-year budget deal.
It gives the Democrats everything they want, except it's the Republicans who have written it.
This expands the national debt all the way up to $19.5 trillion.
It blows the deficit sky high.
It expands spending.
It blows through Republican spending caps.
And it's a two-year budget.
It equals, you know what this is?
The Republicans have essentially, with this budget deal, given us Barack Obama's ninth year.
The first year of the new president's term is going to be a budget signed into law by Barack Obama.
And he loves everything about it.
He loves this budget.
It's pretty much his.
And my point is, when you take away that big, a weapon in your campaign arsenal, that it's the Democrats are the big spenders, that it's the Democrats spending us to oblivion, that it's the Democrats busting the budget, that it's the Democrats spending your grandkids' tax revenue.
When you take that out of the Republican arsenal, I mean, that's one of the primary reasons you go to the election and elect us.
We're going to be responsible.
We're not going to allow that kind of spending.
We're not going to allow those tax increases.
We're not going to allow government to get sold.
That's gone.
We cannot campaign against Hillary Clinton as a big spending.
Now, not to say we won't try.
I guarantee you that even after authoring this budget, the Republicans will run against Hillary as this big spender, and they're going to be the ones to stop her.
And they're going to count on the fact that nobody knows really what's happened in this budget deal, which is why I'm making such a big deal out of it.
But it is the equivalent of Barack Obama's ninth year.
Okay, so let's go to the audio soundbites on this.
Rand Paul promised to filibuster this at the Republican debate, and he did.
His filibuster lasted about 20 minutes.
Here is a brief soundbite yesterday afternoon on the Senate floor.
It's number 11, soundbite number 11 in 3, 2, 1.
Rush Limbaugh says the Republican Party cannot campaign by running around blaming the Democrats for destroying the budget, for overspending, for threatening the very fabric of the country.
They can't do it because they're now complicit.
Here's the thing, we can't point fingers and say, oh, the Democrats are the big spenders.
We now, by this deal, become complicit.
We become equally guilty of supporting new debt.
Bingo, that's exactly right.
And we have thus removed one of the primary differences between us and them in a campaign and in governance.
It's a big deal.
It is a big deal.
And it's being promoted as, well, this is Boehner's gift to the new Speaker, Paul Ryan.
He's giving him a clean slate because Ryan's fingerprints aren't anywhere on this.
So his speakership cannot be held accounted, blaming anything.
And the Republicans wanted this deal because now they've, see, the big thing with the Republicans, the reason they're excited, they have seen to it.
Yes, they have.
That there won't be a government shutdown.
Yes, and because of that, they think they've got a major victory.
Because there won't be a government shutdown, and there won't be a threat of a government shutdown.
And that means they have a chance to win the president.
That's how convoluted the thinking has become.
They basically write a Democrat budget, a budget that Obama loves, and they think that eliminates any chance of a government shutdown.
And a government shutdown is like showing Dracula the cross.
And the fact that that's not going to happen is why they think it's such a big deal.
But you know what?
It doesn't matter.
Do you think any of this is going to stop Harry Reid or Pelosi or take your pick, any of them, from running around saying the Republicans are trying to shut down the government?
I mean, if it's nothing for Harry Reid to lie about Mitt Romney not paying his taxes for 10 years, how hard do you think it'll be for the Democrats in the presidential campaign year to run around saying the Republicans?
Tell you what, they want to shut this government down.
They want to cut Social Security.
They want to cut Medicare, even though the budget has just been blown through the roof for two years.
Do you think the Democrats will not lie about it now?
This is what's never made any sense to me about writing and implementing policy designed to get Democrats to shut up.
They never do shut up.
They're not going to stop the accusation.
Anyway, Ted Cruz was also on the Senate floor.
Last night, three soundbites.
In order, here they are.
This is the combined work product of John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid.
The entire time Republican leaders have been promising, we're going to do something on the budget.
We're going to rein in the president.
They have been in the back rooms negotiating to fund every single thing President Obama did.
I'm reminded it wasn't too long ago we saw El Chapo dug out of his prison cell.
One of the first things you realize when El Chapo was dug out is that tunnel wasn't dug overnight, that the drug cartels had spent many weeks or months digging that tunnel.
So Ted Cruz essentially accuses Mitch McConnell of working for the Democrats.
Ted Cruz goes on to say that Mitch McConnell spends more time on how to defeat conservatives than Harry Reid ever did.
Here's the next bite.
When I said Majority Leader McConnell is the most effective Democratic leader we've seen in modern times, you know what?
Harry Reid didn't spend that much time thinking about how to beat Republicans.
Later McConnell spends more time focused on how to defeat conservatives than Harry Reid ever did.
That is the problem.
It is our own leadership that cooks up deals.
Why do you think, Mr. President, we're voting at 1 in the morning?
Is that an accident?
It is by design.
1 in the morning.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Pay no attention to another $85 billion in debt.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, that is why they hate Ted Cruz.
In the Republican establishment, inside the beltway, wherever you find the Republican commentariat, that's why they hate Ted Cruz.
And make no mistake, they do.
If you're just joining us in the first half hour of the program today, played some soundbites.
You know, Britt Hume, during the debate on Wednesday night, paraphrasing again, tweeted about, well, it's great that Ted Cruz talks about all these fights that he's led, but how many has he won?
The answer, none.
Same, next night, Ted Cruz is on Fox and he's asked, okay, you've led a lot of fights, but how many of you won?
And he lists off three.
One, two, three, bam, bam, bam.
And then they said, but Ted, one of the big problems is you're such a divisive figure.
What do you mean, divisive?
All I do is oppose what's happening here in Washington.
You can't oppose what's happening without being divisive.
If you're not being principled, you're not being divisive.
Of course, I'm divisive.
I'm opposing on principle what's happening in this town, like the rest of the Republicans ought to be as well.
But look, they'd rather not be called divisive.
What does the opposite of divisive mean?
Cooperating.
I'm not going to cooperate with the Republicans and the Democrats rather in their efforts here to transform this country.
So yeah, call me divisive.
But they don't mean divisive.
They mean this guy can't get along with anybody.
This guy just slashes.
He dices.
He just cuts people up.
He doesn't want to work with anybody.
And they want to say that that's why we can't have Cruz.
And then he goes out and says, Mitch McConnell spends more time trying to defeat me and conservatives than Harry Reid ever did.
And here come the long knives on the Republican side for him.
Here's the next and the final bite of Ted Cruz on the Senate floor.
And again, this is last night.
What are the terms of this budget deal?
A bill that adds $85 billion in spending increases.
$85 billion to our national debt.
It's more than the Senate negotiated with the House when Harry Reid was majority leader.
When Harry Reid was majority leader, the Ryan-Murray budget agreement, which was a flawed agreement, an agreement I voted against, increased spending by $63 billion over two years.
Now, Mr. President, what does it say to you that a supposedly Republican majority of the United States Senate negotiates a bigger spending bill than Harry Reid and the Democrats?
Well, what it says is that the Republicans have given away over half their ammunition in a presidential campaign in exchange for what they think is a new reality in which no one can accuse them of wanting to shut down the government.
Brief timeout.
Open line Friday continues after this.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Juan de los Rios.
Here at Johnny Rivers tunes Memphis.
The bumper rotation, the EIB.
What is that?
No, no, no, that's the screensaver for Apple TV that you see.
People asking me what's on my computer.
I found a way to incorporate the screensavers new Apple TV.
And what they are is slow-motion videos of Hong Kong, Hawaii, London, Los Angeles, New York.
No, not LA yet that's coming.
It's London, New York, Hong Kong, China, the Great Wall, and a lot in Hawaii, daytime and nighttime.
And they're either made by helicopter or drones.
And I found a way to get them from Apple TV to my computer.
You're actually downloaded from Apple.
They're being streamed.
And they actually stream on the Apple TV, too.
They're actually not on the hard drive in the Apple TV.
And I'm just playing around with it here.
And one of them kicked in during the last programming segment.
It just kicked in again.
Here's Bob and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Thank you, Mr. Limbaugh.
And appreciate all the knowledge you give me.
It keeps me knowing how to read the green and the green.
Well, thank you, sir, very much.
I woke up this morning and I turned it on C-SPAN and I sat here and watched Mr. Cruz.
It was the most impressive speech I've ever seen.
I haven't seen anybody speak like that in many, many years.
He laid it out.
He opened up the curtain and exposed the men behind the curtain and how everything operates there.
He had pie charts out.
And I would suggest, or if I could recommend to anyone out there listening, if you want to see what a presidential candidate really looks like, look up this video on C-SPAN today.
It was very moving, Rush.
It sent chills up my back.
I never seen anyone speak like this since Ronald Reagan.
Was this your first time seeing Ted Cruz in action like this?
No, I've seen him, but I listened to the whole thing, and he cut right through it.
I mean, he cut right through it.
And if you, I compare, I mean, I'm watching all these debates with, you know, everybody's talking about Trump.
And don't get me wrong, I love Trump.
I love what he's doing.
I love him sticking his finger in their eye, but he can't do what that guy does.
You know, he's shown them how to fight them.
But this gentleman here, he's the real deal.
Well, let me ask you a question then.
Since you are really paying attention and you're really attuned here, I mean, you're dialed in.
You're focused.
You said you like Trump and well, you like what Trump's doing, but Trump ain't that.
What is the difference in Cruz and Trump in your mind, do you think?
Well, there's a club champion and then there's the Tor Pro.
Yeah, but yes, of course.
But what constitutes the difference?
Why is one of them the club champ and the other a tour pro?
What's the guy?
He speaks so well.
He's so smart.
Nobody on that stage, Rush, can touch this guy.
Now, I mean, I've, I mean, I like, you know, I said, all right, I like what Trump's doing, and I'm keeping an open mind about this.
There's only two guys for me.
And, you know, Cruz is the smartest guy in the room.
I mean, there's just no two ways around it.
Mr. Trump, I don't want to insult any of the Trump people.
This guy is just, he's just two notches above.
Yeah, but there's still something else.
Well, I agree that they don't want the.
See, I don't consider him an insider.
He's in there, but he's an outsider.
Still something else.
I just think he's good.
I think he's the guy Rush this morning, but the other day at the debates, when I heard him do what he did, nobody else was that fast on their feet to knock them out.
He's the one that knocked them guys on their butts.
And what he did yesterday, if anybody wants to see that, go look at it.
But, Rush, I appreciate everything that you know.
Now, wait, wait, though.
What's the difference in?
You've given us the behavioral differences, and you've given us what you think are differences in speaking ability and talent.
But what is it that enables Cruz to do all that he does so well that really appeals to you that even other people you like don't quite reach you the way Cruz does?
He's knowledgeable completely on the workings of DC.
Getting warmer, inside out, upside down, backwards.
Getting warmer.
He knows the whole deal.
Mr. Trump, I like Mr. Trump, but Mr. Trump does construction.
He makes the call.
He doesn't have to deal with the 435 idiots they got sitting up there.
This guy knows it inside and out.
He knows his way around it.
And what I saw this morning.
No, wait, wait, now let me step in.
Because Trump does deal with the 435, and they all love him.
But he has the final say to me.
Yeah, but you were getting warmer.
Now you get a little chillier.
You're moving away from—I mean, I've got—there's one answer to my question.
There is a right answer.
And it's not any big deal that you're not getting there.
Because it's a modified.
It's not a trick question, but some might think it is.
Okay, okay.
Just calm down, everybody.
Calm down here.
We'll be back.
You need to turn it up to at least 800 decibels.
You're going to hear everything that happens, every syllable, every syllabolic intonation.
800-282-2882 and the email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Barb in Columbus, Ohio.
You're next.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thanks for taking my call, Rush.
I would like to share my theory on why Joe Biden announced last Wednesday he is not running for president.
Oh, goodie.
Yay!
Let's hear this.
I'm fast because I have my own theory about this.
Oh, I wonder if it's the same one.
Well, let's find out.
Yeah.
It was a day after reports said that his close, reliable sources said he would be running.
So I think it's a classic Clinton mafia move.
My theory is Hillary Clinton made a phone call last Tuesday to the White House threatening to divulge what really happened in Benghazi if Biden runs.
Hmm.
I actually think that it's the opposite.
What say you?
Well, let me explain.
Let me explain.
I'm not sure that I'm not, I'm not sure that Hillary can just call somebody and blackmail them without somebody being able to blackmail her in return.
I think she and O, you know, she has this private server.
We don't know what was on that server.
We think we do, but we haven't been, they haven't been up front.
We don't know what's on that.
We don't know what that server might relate to Obama.
We don't know who else had private servers.
Everybody's thinking that Hillary is the only one, but if there's one private server, there might be two or three others, too.
So my theory on this is Biden's speech in the Rose Garden with Obama standing next to him.
And he gives a speech that you would give if you were running.
He gives a speech that you would give if you were going to run, except he not running.
Now, you and me, you and I may be closer than I think, because I think that speech was written, and I think Biden was going to go.
I think it was Obama who, because Obama's standing there while he's doing that speech, I think if anybody told Joe to back off and wait, it's Obama.
But I think Biden holds the key to what happens here.
I think Biden, if there's anything going on behind the scenes, it's Biden that has access to stuff that, if leaked, can do damage to Hillary.
I think it's Biden and Obama who do.
And the fact that he gave a speech, Barb, that was identical to somebody who was running, if something happens, if there's something leaked that is damaging to Mrs. Clinton.
And by the way, I didn't get to this yesterday, the day before, but there was a story that the FBI director, James Comey, the FBI, is still investigating her and seriously over this email server thing and classified documents.
And this story really gave me the impression that Comey and the FBI are proceeding independently outside any sphere of influence that might be exerted against them by Obama or whatever.
And it clearly left the impression this isn't over with and that there may be something to find that the FBI is serious about finding it.
And if that's true, then Biden has left himself a wide open door to jump back in based on the speech he gave because he already announced his agenda.
He already gave us his reason for running.
The only thing out of congruence there was he said he wasn't going to.
So we're closer than I originally thought.
But in the end, the odds are that nothing's going to happen and that Hillary is going to be the nominee.
Testing, one too.
Barb, you still there?
Yeah, yeah.
You know, I just, I hear what you're saying, and I agree with it also.
I just think this is a classic Clinton mafia move.
I'm just getting a horse's head in the bed that night.
Yeah, yeah.
It wouldn't be a horse's head.
It would be a horse's ass.
Well, maybe wearing a blue dress and a cigar.
I don't know.
Here's the thing.
Clearly, Barb was alive and paying attention in the 90s.
And that's her frame of reference here when she's talking Clinton mafia.
And for people think that for people who think that Obama might be the one that has the goods on her, maybe so.
But the Clintons aren't sitting over there naked.
They've got their own OPPO research.
That's all they do is collect it.
And so I think after what happened to Hillary in 2008, the Clinton mafia, as you say, the Clinton campaign, the Clinton war room, they're not taking any chances this time around.
And I think they probably have collected a bunch of stuff to, as you say, maybe threaten Biden.
I'm not sure they had to, but it could have.
But regardless, they've got some insurance policy in place to make sure that something doesn't happen this year like happened in 2007 with Obama, who came out of the blue and just shocked and surprised everybody.
Barb, thanks for the call.
I appreciate it.
Back to the audio soundbites.
I want to start here with number 13.
I'm going to get to this Jeb Bush stuff.
This is a point that needs to be remade.
And it is this U.S. News and World story that Jeb Bush's campaign blueprint has been leaked to them.
Now, of all places, and nothing against U.S. news.
But if you're going to leak something, I mean, the Republicans generally leak to Politico.
That's my experience.
Usually you find out what the establishment Republicans are thinking or doing because there's going to be a story about it in the Politico.
So they leak there.
Somebody in the Bush campaign, somebody, well, maybe one of the donors.
I don't know.
There are probably a lot of upset people in the Bush campaign right now.
I mean, if you've given a lot of money, it's an investment.
Campaign donation is an investment.
If you've invested a ton of money in Jeb, you can't be, you have to be a little nervous right now.
And you have to be desirous that they either get serious or get out.
Because you can't go on this way.
You can't go on with the guy you're giving money to at 5%.
And you can't have any more of these debate performances like you had the other night because he's not going to move the needle.
So somebody's leaking this stuff.
And what this leaked document demonstrates is that my instincts yesterday were right on the money.
This is an antique playbook.
And what gave it away for me, this was the third debate.
And in each of the debates, Jeb's number one self-spoken asset, the thing he thinks that is his best qualification is his political resume as governor of Florida.
And I watched the debate on Wednesday night.
Every time he started talking about that resume, however he described it, I've raised tax.
I've cut taxes every year I was governor.
We reduced spending.
He started going through the resume and I looked at Catherine and I said, this is crazy.
We live in an era right now where people hate politicians.
And every time he brings out that resume, he's distancing himself further from people.
This is the exact opposite of what people want now.
Trump does not have one of these political resumes.
Ben Carson does not have one.
Ted Cruz does not have much of one.
The leaders in the Republican primary do not talk that way.
They do not have a political resume where they can recite all the great things they did as governor, the great things they did as senator.
It doesn't impress anybody anymore because those are the people perceived to be the architects of the problems that we have.
That's what Inside the Beltway means.
Inside the Beltway means many things, but among the things it means is professional politicians are there and they have screwed it up royally and professional politicians are not listening to us anyway.
So who wants to hear a political politician resume?
And yet that's what they're sending Jeb out to hype.
So my conclusion was that whoever's running this campaign is about two or three election cycles too far back in the past.
This might have worked in 1996.
It might have worked in 1992.
It might have worked in 2000.
But it's not the way you're going to win a debate or stand out in this.
And they haven't figured this out.
This is three debates, static in the polls are plummeting, and they keep reciting the resume as governor.
And it just, it made me start questioning.
The Bush campaign, understand this, the donors and the Republican Party powers that be, they put their eggs in the Bush basket.
So I've thought, this is a key element here, too, just by observing, I know nothing.
And look, I need to stress again here that discussing these things is somewhat difficult for me.
The Bush family has been nothing but great to me from Bush 41 to Bush 43.
I mean, I've met Jeb a couple times.
I have no animus for this family in any way, shape, manner, or form.
They are some of the best people that you would ever meet.
They're just fine people.
But politically, they're not as conservative as I would like and prefer.
But I have absolutely no personal dislike or anything of the sort for them.
But I do know, I think I know, in watching Jeb, I've never gotten the impression he's really into this.
It just has never struck me that he really wants.
You know, Jeb was the guy.
If you go back to 2000, Jeb was the guy that everybody thought was going to be the next Bush president, governor of Florida, and he was back then.
His resume was big, and it was powerful, and it was impressive.
And George W. Bush, governor of Texas, came out of nowhere and started raising money like crazy and was up crazy in the polls, and Jeb just kind of faded.
I don't think there's any serious family rivalry over this, but Jeb was the guy, okay, but it became W. But they want back the whole apparatus.
So I think Jeb's a placeholder for the people who really want to be back in power in Washington, whoever they are.
I don't know who they are.
I mean, I love to name names, but I just know that there's an apparatus that loves being in power in Washington.
And none of them can be elected, don't want to be elected.
They need somebody to be elected, and Jeb's the guy.
And they're trying to program him to be a good candidate, and they're trying to coach him.
Like he's overcoached.
I think he's on the debate stage.
They've got him going after Rubio in certain ways, in ways he wouldn't do on his own.
And they've got him memorizing responses to things that might be said.
And I think you're looking at somebody who's basically not being themselves and instead trying to remember what he's been told to say and how to say it if a certain moment arises.
And that just leads to paralysis.
And when the paralysis happens is when Jeb goes back to what's comfortable, and that's the political resume.
I cut taxes every year.
I was one of the most conservative governors in the state, Florida history, and I had a greatest conservative governor rating and record.
All this stuff.
That's what's comfortable to him, and that's what got him elected back in the day.
But it's not an asset today.
So now this blueprint's been leaked.
112-page internal document.
And it's basically an OPO research document.
It's all kinds of dirt on Marco Rubio.
It's got the goals and objectives for winning Iowa.
It has the advertising plan for January.
And it also contains a tidbit that they focus group tested the phrase, my brother kept us safe.
He kept us safe, meaning W, after 9-11.
They actually went out and focus grouped that before, not this debate, the one before that.
The second debate, they focus grouped it.
And it scored off the charts.
So they came out of the focus group thinking, all Jeb's got to do is, if anybody attacks W, all they've got, all Jeb's got to do is say he kept us safe, and he's going to just score a big home run.
And it was just the opposite.
You remember what Trump did with it?
So they've been bamboozled throughout this whole thing.
I got to take a break now, but a couple soundbites coming up after this support all this.
Hang tough.
No, no, no.
Look, my only point is the creme to the creme is running this Bush campaign.
And if that's the best the Republican Party by reputation has, I mean, they're behind the times.
That's my only point.
I don't know who they are, so it's not, I'm not, it's not a personal attack.
I'm just observing.
A couple of Jeb soundbites.
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, yesterday.
What do you make of the headlines say that your campaign's on life support?
It's not on life support.
We have the most money.
We have the greatest organization.
We're doing fine.
Look, there's eight more debates.
There's ample time to do exactly what candidates do.
End is not near.
And last night on NBC, the website interview, a reporter said, you told donors today on a conference call that you said that you're going to get better at this.
What are you going to do to get better?
Look, we've got eight more debates.
I'm going to have to do what other candidates do, which is rudely interrupt, not answer the questions that are asked.
And hopefully the debate moderators will actually ask more substantive questions as well.
It's going fine.
Are you having any fun?
Oh, yeah.
You saw it.
I'm having lots of fun.
Now, I'm sorry, but this sounds like somebody that resents this whole process.
Look, what are you going to do to get better?
Well, I'm going to have to do what other candidates do, which is rudely interrupt and not answer the questions that are asked.
Jeb kind of resents it's not serious enough or not substantive enough or what.
I'm just doing it.
I'm going to have to learn to be rude, and I'm going to have to learn to not be forthright with the news media and so forth.
I can do it.
If I have to sink to the level these other people, that's what I'll do.
I just sounds like somebody resents what he has to do here to break out.
Just my personal opinion.
What a week, folks.
What a great week.
A brand new Rush Revere book is out.
Rush Revere Star-Spangled Banner, a sterling week here at the EIB Network and the Rush Limbaugh program.
Just fabulous because of you people.
And we're back here on Monday, kicked up, revved up, ready to go again.
Thanks so much.
Have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection