All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 29, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
October 29, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Great to be back here, folks.
Welcome back, Rush Linbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone for yet another hour.
Of today's excursion into broadcast excellence, telephone numbers 800 282-2882.
And your phone calls are coming up in this hour.
Rarely have I felt the need to cram so much into a program.
Okay, immediately after the debate last night.
Well, actually, you know, it wasn't immediately after.
I got I got the uh I got the note about this about 20 to 10, so there was still little over a half hour left in the debate.
And apparently Britt Hume couldn't wait to pounce on Ted Cruz.
I know it seems incongruous as it can be, but what what Cruz did to irritate Britt Hume was to list all of the fights that he has led as Senator and as attorney general, the things that he has tried to get done, the things he's tried to stop, the things he's tried to achieve.
And so Britt Hume tweeted, Ted Cruz going on about all the fights he's led in Washington, never mentions the number of fights he's won.
The answer is none.
The answer is none.
Is that how we're going to judge things now?
Ted Cruz, the one guy in the United States Senate that's trying to stop this decline of this government.
The one guy trying to make something happen, the one guy trying to lead others.
The one guy trying to turn the Linguini spined Republicans into spines of steel in the United States Senate.
Why do you think a good friend of mine sent me no, why do you think a movement is called a movement?
Because it has to move.
Doesn't make the case.
If it doesn't make the case, if the movement doesn't make the case, even in the face of temporary defeats, that it dies.
Where would Obama be if he had believed when the Berlin Wall fell down that communism was finished?
Where would where would any of the leftist Democrats, the Olinskiites today be if they had just thrown in the towel?
Oh my God, our precious Berlin Wall is down.
Our precious Soviet Union's over.
I guess that's it for us.
They didn't react that way, did they?
They never stop moving.
They never stop fighting.
They never stop trying to win.
And they don't win every time, and nobody puts that kind of judgment on them.
Everybody sits around and marvels at how often they do win.
But in order to win, you have to move.
You have to have movements.
You have to lead efforts.
I mean, the Democrat Party had a bunch of people back in 1993 who thought, you know, we gotta abandon this drift to the left.
It's over.
The Berlin Wall is down.
Ronald Reagan, 1976, lost the Republican presidential nomination.
Guess it was over.
Guess Reagan's a failure.
He led a waged a fight and he lost.
Yeah, what good's Reagan?
Kept fighting.
I really think this is instructive too.
This is this is establishment type thinking from inside the belt.
Way the left has lost every one of their battles until they've won them.
Name for me somebody wins all the time.
This is this tweet is, I mean, it was it was unnecessarily.
Well, what is the point of going after Cruz last night?
What is it?
Because there's this great fear inside the stablish.
Like I said yesterday, folks, and I mean this, and I didn't know Drudge is going to make it his lead headline yesterday, but I'll tell you the d the Republican establisher would much rather have Hillary Clinton than Ted Cruz be president.
Ted Cruz scares the heck out of them because Hillary will keep the gravy train rolling.
Hillary will keep the government growing.
Hillary will keep the money being redistributed, should keep taxing people, government's gonna get bigger, all kinds of money around, all kinds of jobs in the government, all kinds of work for lobbyists and so forth, and Cruz stands for an attempt to reduce all of that.
And so the people in Washington who feed off the federal teeth are threatened by somebody who wants to reduce the number of teats.
Imagine Ted Cruz being the biggest enemy when you are a Republican or a conservative, either an elected official, a campaign official, media figure, or whatever, Ted Cruz.
Your biggest enemy.
I said last night of one of the things that irritated me the most about the behavior of the assassins, disguised as journalists, moderators of the debate last night.
Was the there was an overarching assumption as they attempted to impugn the character, the qualifications, the capabilities of all of these people on stage last night.
And the overarching thing was that none of them are qualified.
None of them are qualified.
They don't know what they're doing.
And of course, the assumption that every Democrat is qualified.
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama.
Bill Barack Obama is maybe the most unqualified president we've had in my lifetime.
He has been a singular disaster.
But you know why he's said to be qualified?
And Hillary and all that with these people?
Because he cares about people.
He's such a good guy.
He's compassionate, and maybe he doesn't know he's doing, but he's trying, he's trying to help people.
At least you're Republicans, you don't care if you keep people out of the country and kick people out of their homes and kick people out of the abortion clinics and arm every and it just goes on and on and on.
And it's why I get continually frustrated with Republicans who think they have to deal with these people, think they have to change their minds.
Chain, they have to think they have to persuade them if they're gonna win anything.
Here's a montage of some of these gotcha attack questions last night from the debate.
Is this a comic book version of a presidential campaign?
You want to bring the 70,000 pages to three?
Is that using all type?
You've been a young man in a hurry ever since you won your first election in your twenties.
Why not slow down, get a few more things done first, or at least finish what you start.
Miss Fiorina, your board fired you.
I just wondered why you think we should hire you now.
Bankruptcy is a broken promise.
Why should the voters believe the promises that you're telling them right now?
Senator Rubio, you've had issues.
You have a lack of bookkeeping skills.
You accidentally intermingled campaign money with your personal money.
It raises the question whether you have the maturity and the wisdom to leave a 17 trillion dollar economy.
Why would you serve on a company whose policies seem to run counter to your views on homosexuality?
A company called Manitech, with which you had a ten-year relationship.
They paid seven million dollars to settle a deceptive marketing lawsuit in Texas, and yet your involvement continued.
Why?
Mr. Trump says that he is capable of growing the economy so much that Social Security and Medicare don't have to be touched.
Do you want to explain how that's gonna happen, Mr. Trump?
The leading Republican candidate when you look at the average of national polls right now is Donald Trump.
When you look at him, do you see someone with the moral authority to unite the country?
Such a nasty question.
Yeah, well, at all.
It's all nasty, and it's all based on a desire to destroy these people.
There wasn't any attempt to get any understanding to learn what they stand for or what their policies are.
It's laughable.
It's even it's a joke to even mention that as a possibility.
This was a kill show last night.
Those questions were not just biased, those questions were not just unfair.
Those were perfectly structured, mean spirited bombs.
The questions themselves did not require any answers.
The questions themselves were designed to be what shaped public opinion in that debate.
The questions themselves, the moderators, the assassins were attempting to characterize our candidates, and it didn't matter what our candidates said.
That was the purpose of those questions.
There is no doubt about this.
The day ought to come where we stop giving them this opportunity.
They're going to take it anyway, whether it's a debate format or the nightly news.
They're going to do these kinds of things.
Our people need to focus and spend most of their time on creating a bond with the American people, like Carson and Trump have done.
That's how you blunt this stuff.
You don't blunt this stuff by taking these people on and getting into a shouting match with them and telling them how they're rude, although that was a good line from Christie to her.
Well, you know, John.
What you're doing even in New Jersey would be called rude.
It was a great line.
But let's contrast this montage you just heard.
Let's go back and listen to Anderson Cooper and Dana Bash and Juan Carlos Lopez ask questions of the Democrats in their last days.
Secretary Clinton, though, with all due respect.
Senator Sanders, you call yourself a democratic socialist.
How can any kind of socialist win a general election?
We're gonna have a lot more on these issues, but I do want to just quickly get everybody in on the question of electability.
Secretary Clinton, is Bernie Sanders tough enough on guns?
Senator Sanders, what would you do differently?
Is she too quick to use military force?
Senator Sanders, I want you to be able to respond.
Who or what is the greatest national security threat?
Secretary Clinton, with all due respect, do you want to respond?
Do black lives matter or do all lives matter?
Secretary Clinton, what would you do for African Americans in this country that President Obama couldn't?
Senator Sanders, what are you gonna be able to do the President Obama didn't?
Secretary Clinton, how would you address this issue?
Why's your plan better?
Is that something that you would support?
Secretary Clinton, Governor O'Malley wants to open up Obamacare to millions of undocumented immigrants and their children.
Do you?
Secretary Clinton, do you regret your vote on the Patriot document?
Governor Chafee, Edward Snowden, is he a traitor or a hero?
Governor O'Malley, how would you be different than President Obama's administration?
Secretary Clinton, how would you not be a third term of President Obama?
Why should Democrats embrace an insider like yourself?
Senator Sanders, are you tougher on climate change than Secretary Clinton?
There wasn't one gotcha.
There wasn't one question that even even got near whether or not these people are qualified.
There weren't any characterizing of uh these candidates as buffoonish or as cartoonish.
There were no references to any of the negatives of any of these people.
Mrs. Clinton didn't get a question about her husband's philandering.
She didn't get one question about her own questionable foundation with all of the dubious donations.
The questions that happened on the email scandal were brushed over by Bernie Sanders.
That this is what passes for tough questions of Democrats.
What you just heard, that's what passes as tough questions.
That's as much as they will ever face.
This is as tough a question as any Democrat candidate will ever face.
Here is Ted Cruz, by the way, uh was it uh Frank Luntz said that he has never had in his focus group these people with their dials recording their responses as they hear things.
He's never, never had anybody get anywhere near the territory that Ted Cruz got in audience approval.
When he finally got fed up with the line and nature of questioning last night and just tore into these assassins.
The questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why the American people don't trust the media.
This is not a cage match.
Donald Trump, are you a comic book villain?
Ben Carson, can you do math?
John Kasich, will you insult two people over here?
Marco Rubio, why don't you resign?
Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?
How about talking about the substantive issues people?
Does this cause?
Is this what do we get credit for this one?
And Carl, I'm not finished yet.
The contrast with the Democratic debate, where every fawning question from the media was, which of you is more handsome and wise.
The men and women on this stage have more ideas, more experience, more common sense than every participant in the Democratic debate.
That debate reflected a debate between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks.
And nobody watching at home believes that any of the moderators has any intention of voting in a Republican primary.
The questions that are being asked shouldn't be trying to get people to tear into each other.
It's not that I look, I agree, but that's not what they were trying to do.
They were trying to destroy each and every one of you, Senator Cruz, just with the question.
They didn't care what you did with it.
They didn't care what happened.
They don't even care that you tore into them.
Although it did change in in tone after this eruption from Cruz.
But they didn't care.
They didn't care what the answers were.
They weren't even trying to stoke interaction between the candidates.
The questions alone were the bullets.
The cameras and the microphones were the guns.
And the questions were the bullets, and it didn't matter after that.
What happened after the question of very little practical interest as far as the moderators slash assassins are concerned?
Marco Rubio had a good contribution to all of this too when he described Hillary Clinton's super PAC.
The Democrats have the ultimate superpack.
It's called the mainstream media.
Whoever single day.
And I'll tell you why.
Last week, Hillary Clinton went before a committee.
She admitted she had sent emails to her family saying, hey, this attack in Benghazi was caused by Al Qaeda-like elements.
She spent over a week telling the families of those victims and the American people that it was because of a video.
And yet the mainstream media is going around saying it was the greatest week in Hillary Clinton's campaign.
It was the week she got exposed as a liar.
It was the week that she got exposed as a liar.
But she has her super pack helping her out, the American mainstream media.
It's so long overdue that these people would call out the media this way.
This is what the voters, this is what we, this is what the American people have been begging for, asking for.
Stand up to him.
Push back.
Fight back.
Don't take it.
And that's why this resonated coast to coast.
This even resonated with low information voters.
This resonated with people who've never believed that there really is media bias, who are watching.
This resonated with people all over the country in all demographics.
What happened last night?
The media is too arrogant to understand they've done themselves any damage.
It's not possible.
And by the way, how much more damage can they face?
They're losing audience, they're losing pages, they're losing advertising revenue, and they don't care.
It doesn't matter to the people on camera or use the computer to write their pieces.
It does matter to their management, I guess.
But if it weren't for subsidies of some of these companies and cable subsidies the way they work out, half these networks wouldn't even be on the air.
Now, one thing about Cruz, Cruz is right here.
The Democrat debate was a debate between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks.
Now, a lot of people Bolsheviks, what the Mensheviks, who are they?
The Bolsheviks beat the Mensheviks.
The Bolsheviks succeeded in beating the Mensheviks because they took over the Russian news media with guns.
That's what Cruz's reference.
Well, not the guns, but he was referring to the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks as what we saw on stage at the Democrat debate.
Quick time out, my friends, phone calls are next as we move on.
Don't go.
According to all the online polls, ladies and gentlemen, after the debate, some of them are scientific, some of them are not, but regardless, according to all of the online polls, including Drudge and Time and even CNBC's own poll, Donald Trump won that thing going away last night.
Now, and a lot of well, Rush, how can that be?
Rush, and the media is he didn't say much.
He didn't insult anybody.
If you don't understand this, you know, this is my my point here in the j point I was made of the Jeb campaign earlier in not recognizing where they are, what they're up against, the nature of the electorate this time around.
Trump has established a bond with his voters.
There hasn't been anything happen that make them lose any enthusiasm for him.
The media's not going to be able to do that.
Other candidates aren't going to be able to do that.
You're not going to be able to beat Trump by taking him out.
The only way anybody's going to beat Trump is being better than he is.
Which is as it should be.
The media thinks they can take anybody out they want to take out.
So there's a Trump's in decline.
Trump's dis Trump didn't show up last night.
Trump was not nearly as bombastic.
Trump wasn't who Trump is.
Trump didn't insult Mexicans.
Doesn't matter.
Trump showed up.
Trump was engaged.
Trump had things to say, and they made Sense and he scored points, mission accomplished.
What do you people think?
He has to go out and insult people like that's what you think he does, and that's why you think people like him.
This is I'll tell you, all of this is so insulting to me.
Trump's only there because we have a bunch of bigoted Republicans that hate Mexicans, and Trump went out and tapped into it, and that's what they think, and that's why they don't deserve our attention and our time whatsoever on their networks for any amount of serious discussion about the next presidency and the future of this country because they are not interested in anything than their own bigotry, their own racism, their own small mindedness.
And the time has long passed that we need to stop catering to these people.
As we, though, somehow need them.
Because that's the message of this campaign.
We don't need them.
The leaders in this campaign have done it despite the media and without them, and that is a good lesson for everybody to learn.
Rush Limbaugh behind the Golden EIB microphone here at the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Okay, to the phones we go.
This is uh Lianna in Cincinnati.
Great to have you.
You're up first.
Welcome.
Thank you.
Hi, Rush.
Hi.
Um I absolutely loved last night.
I I loved the fact that somebody finally took it to them.
It was kind of like the Wellstone Memorial.
It was so over the top that they were really the cartoon.
And I just hope that we keep it up.
Because it can't just happen and have no response.
Well, now that's an interesting comparison.
The Wells Stone Memorial.
If if I get your analogy, the Wellstone Memorial was the left one just over the top and and just offending everybody and driving everybody away at what was supposed to be a funeral like service, a memorial like service, something that everybody supposedly loved and they turned it into a giant partisan event.
You know, you one thing about this last night that is of interest is will there be any lasting effect to it?
In other words, how long will people remember it?
And it also, it really for me crystallized um my want to support Ted Cruz because he really took it to them, and it was very enjoyable to watch.
Speaking of that, I just thanks very much, Leanna, for the call.
I appreciate it.
I just received CNBC's website.
Are you smarter than a GOP candidate?
Grade level assessment of candidates' spoken words in the first three Republican debates.
Donald Trump is at the youngest end of the spectrum, averaging a fifth grade level of vocabulary.
Maybe that's why he's doing so well.
Well, what did I just tell you?
These people on that stage, the CNBC moderators, it doesn't matter, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNB, you name it, they all have a certain set of beliefs.
Republicans are stupid, they are Neanderthals.
You are mind-numbed robots.
You like Trump because you think he hates Mexicans and you hate Mexicans, and that's why they love Trump, and that's why Trump's doing well, and that's what they think.
They don't hear Trump say he's going to make this country great again.
They don't hear Trump say we're gonna start winning.
We're gonna beat ISIS, we're gonna beat China, we're gonna beat Mexico in trade deals.
We're going to return to being a legitimate superpower.
No, the media doesn't hear that.
Because they are so obsessed and so convinced that you're stupid, that you're dumb, that you're dense, that you're racist, that you're sexist, that you're bigoted, that you're homophobic, that anybody gets your support must also be the same.
And that's the starting point.
All of that they assume.
All of that they know they're right about.
So Trump's support is illegitimate.
It's made up of mean-spirited, stupid deliverance type bigots.
And that is what they really think.
This is why I don't have any patience for any of our so-called pseudo intellectuals in Washington who want to make friends with these people.
Who want to be in the club with them, who want to be wherever with them.
We have nothing in common.
They have no desire to see us as similar equals with respect or any of that.
Their strict, avowed purpose is to render us irrelevant as a political power.
That means defeat after defeat after defeat, and they don't care how.
Their minds are never going to change about who we are and about who Trump is.
So here we have Are You Smarter than a GOP candidate from CNBC?
Grade-level assessments of candidates spoke in words.
First three GOP debates.
Donald Trump at the youngest end of the spectrum, averaging a fifth-grade level of vocabulary.
Maybe that's why he's doing so well in the polls.
His simple, straightforward talk has resonated with the electorate.
The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
But the competition isn't all that great.
On the other extreme end, we have Ted Cruz.
Ted Cruz is the smartest guy in the Republican room, and his vocabulary represents that of a ninth grader.
You can say whatever.
I've got it right here, my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
Of course it's straight up BS.
And the day after the debate, you what you expected these people to be humble after this shaming last night?
You expected them to be apologetic.
You expected them to be chagrined.
Hell no, not sheepish.
They're doubling down.
Are you smarter than a GOP candidate?
So Donald Trump speaks at a fifth grade level, but you know the competition isn't all that great because true Cruz is the smartest, and he speaks at a ninth grade level.
Ted Cruz has more intellect in his little finger than John Harwood will accumulate in his entire worthless life.
You know this business about qualifications.
Who the hell is Becky Quick?
Who is Carl Quintinella?
Who is Harwood?
Why are they vaunted authoritarians over these people seeking the presidency?
Why are they accorded status such that they get to determine whether or not somebody's qualified?
Because they are journalists.
Well, what's the qualification for a journalist today?
Very simple.
Democrats good, Republicans bad.
Good, you got the job.
That's all it takes.
That's the nub of it.
Democrats good, Republicans bad, you get the gig.
Turn it around.
What have these journalists have?
Here you have here you have Ben Carson.
There is no finer human being on this earth.
There's no finer man in terms of character, morality, dignity, love of his fellow man, children, pediatric surgeon, has performed surgical miracles.
And here we have three insignificant nabobs trying to destroy him last night on the basis that he can't do mathematics or that his tax plan doesn't add up or some such thing.
Sorry, folks, I have lost my patience for this.
Becky Quick?
What is Becky Quick without somebody at CNBC deciding you need somebody who looks good on TV and they hire her because she can talk about crony capitalism, which is what CNBC does.
You would think a business network would be pro-business.
You had a business network that's pro-government and pro-business that is in bed with government.
But businesses that aren't in bed with government, they're the bad guys on CNBC.
We are to sit here and read how our candidates have no better than ninth grade speaking ability versus what we saw on CNBC last night and every day on their network, which, by the way, nobody's watching anymore.
Another curious reason why Reinz Prevus chose him to host the debate, but that's a that's a whole other story.
I just I'm insulted by this presumption that all of them are the brainiacs, they're the smart ones, they're the qualified ones.
Here's Donald Trump.
I don't care what you think of his personality.
Frankly, it's none of your damn business.
You go do what he's done and then tell him he's worthless.
Go do what Ben Carson's done and then tell him and tell the rest of us that he doesn't know what he's doing, or any of the others up there.
Going after Carly Fiorina on this HP business and giving Hillary Clinton a pass.
Well, I know it's the name of the game, but the point is this has so long ago been obvious.
I mean, why does the war on women even you believe the folly?
The war on women, this the whole idea that a political party seeks to win elections by conducting a war on women.
And the only reason that exists is because a Clinton hack moderated a debate on ABC, taking time off from his job as a host of an early morning show on ABC.
We have a Clinton war room specialist disguised as a journalist on ABC, and he moderated a debate.
And he asks Smitt Romney about contraception somewhere, and it becomes a war on women.
The intellectual folly of the whole concept of a political party having a war on women, and yet it's alive and well.
And it lives and breathes, and it's out there each and every day, and it exists as a legitimate arsenal in the Democrat Party weapon.
It boggles the mind.
And to me, it would be so easy to nuke this stuff.
With Ted Cruz showing the way for people, this is the way to deal with these people each and every day on Meet the Press, on Face the Nation.
Wherever you encounter these people, throw it right back at them.
If you're gonna go on their shows, you have to treat them for what they are.
You are going on shows moderated by Democrat Party campaign activists.
Paul Bagala's over there at CNN, James Carville is where anybody will have him.
Now David Axelrod, he's making around some MSNBC to CNN.
David Pluff, who ran the Obama campaign.
Meanwhile, the Republican consultants that get hired are of all the losers who are running around basically agreeing with all that the Democrat consultants say.
They all have the same enemy, conservatives, you and me.
And it's legit because we are their biggest threat.
We do threaten their power.
Because we can beat them.
Anyway, another break.
We've run up against the wall here, but more of your phone calls are coming up.
Sit tight back after this.
Yeah, yeah, I've got I've got the story on Harwood lying about Rubio's tax plan and even he corrected his own lie in a previous column and lied about that.
So I've got that here.
I know what it got bogged out with individual lies.
The whole thing last night was a lie.
Every one of those moderators is a lie.
They are liars and pretending falsely who they are.
The whole thing from the get-go was staged.
There was nothing legitimate about that last night.
Of course Harwood's a liar.
Of course he misrepresents what Republicans do.
Of course he lies about their tax plans.
And then we got CNBC with their big story today.
are you smarter than a GOP candidate?
College level speaking not required at the GOP debates is the subhead.
Well, I just happen to have a story here in my formerly nicotine stained thing.
Who runs the damn schools in this country?
Is it not the Democratic freaking party and the American left who have had monopoly control over it for as long as you and I have been alive?
Detroit public schools, 93% not proficient in reading.
Not proficient in math.
Harwood probably could teach there.
The Department of Education has published fiscal information on the Detroit public schools for the 2011-2012 scrubal year.
That year the Detroit public scrubs had total expenditures of $18,000 per student.
It included $13,000 per student for current expenditures, $3,000 per student for capital outlays, and $1,700 per student for interest on the school system's debt.
93% not proficient in reading Detroit public schools.
67% eighth graders not proficient in reading nationwide.
Who's running the school system?
The very people moderating at debate last night with their smug arrogance, telling us they've got all the answers.
They're the brilliant ones, they're the smart ones.
They have all the policies.
They have destroyed this country.
They're in the process of governing a country in decline.
They are engaged in implementing policies which will further this decline.
We have people running for the presidency who are trying to save this country, and of course they're the enemy.
They would be Republicans.
But every one of the cities on this list, the National is 67%, Detroit is 93%, Albuquerque, Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore City, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, D.C., Fresno, Jefferson County, Kentucky, Los Angeles.
They're all over 50% in students that cannot read at an eighth grade level.
And we get a story about the Republican candidates so stupid.
That the smartest one speaks at a ninth grade level.
Well, I guess that means everybody in America can relate to them.
Thanks to the Democrat Party running the country's education system.
Look, folks, I apologize I normally don't get this this agitated, but this is this is the result.
This is this is a little bit of an explosion here after just 25 years of reacting to all this stuff in a in a in a muted and restrained way.
But I after this this boondoggle last night, what it really was.
Um I'm just I'm I'm kind of frustrated.
I'm beyond that point where I'm just content to wait for people to figure it out.
Meaning what's going on.
I mean, this is just our country's hanging in the balance because of this stuff.
And the idea that we somehow feel we have to kowtow or impress whatever these people in the media, if we are to win or advance our ideas, is just I think that was illustrated last night's exact opposite.
And I don't think by any stretch, if you you look at public opinion polls on various industries and businesses and the public opinion of them, journalism is below the public opinion at Congress.
Now, Congress is public opinion's always in the gutter.
That's always been the case.
Journalism's even below that for a reason.
Even low information voters don't think they're getting the truth.
It's one of the reasons so many of them are turned to the Kardashians.
At least when they lie about them, it doesn't matter.
Have you heard the latest from the Department of Energy, the Obama administration?
Pumpkins cause climate change.
Pumpkins, Jack of Latters, pumpkin pie.
Whatever you do with pumpkins, you are contributing to climate change.
You see Berkeley study links economic inequality to climate change.
Right.
What doesn't?
Okay, folks.
One big exciting broadcast hour remains.
And we uh could really say we're just getting warmed up here.
So hang in there, be tough.
We'll come back and get to it right after this brief timeout.
▲
Export Selection