All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 12, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:15
October 12, 2015, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Have a more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, and that's because I'm doing what I love, doing what I was born to do.
And it's true what they say.
When you do what you love, it's not really work.
Even though it is.
You don't mind.
Here's the telephone number if you'd like to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
I'm telling you, snarling, do not discount this.
We've been making this mistake now since the early 90s.
The left will go out, the Democrats, somebody will say something just totally outrageous.
Like all these clowns that predicted the end of the earth in ten years, if we didn't clean up the oceans, or name your prediction.
Twenty years ago, if we didn't fix 40 years ago, if we didn't fix global warming in 20 years, we weren't going to be able to inhabit the East Coast.
I mean, all of these things.
Or take this food's going to kill you, that food's going to save you.
People believe this stuff.
And the latest example of that, I didn't get to it on Friday.
Do you realize the serious nutritional consequences there have been to the government lying to you about not eating butter and not eating whole milk and avoiding cream?
All of this, don't eat that stuff because it's so high in fats going to clog your artery.
It turns out to be just wrong.
Just dead wrong.
There are no health consequences to eating butter instead of margarine.
In fact, margarine may be worse now, given this, what is it, hydrogenated stuff.
But you know, people skim milk all the time, no whole milk candidate, no cream, uh, give me butter, and so it turns out that there's heart, there's nothing wrong with it at all.
It just people have been lied to over and over and over, and they believe it.
And people have actually been talked into believing that normal everyday milk is gonna kill them for crying out loud.
And it never has been true.
Now, if you don't like it, that's fine.
But people are avoiding it because they think it's gonna kill them or shorten their lifespan.
Same thing with butter, and they've just been lied to about it.
But when the government says it, when the government proclaims it, that's why Democrats want control of the government.
It has an automatic respect factor and credibility to it.
Even though the government makes most mistakes big time screws up everything it does so bad that new fixes are necessary that the government's said to be the only ones it can engage in, they just screw everything up.
And then they are the first people, first ones people demand fix it, the people that made the mess in the first place.
Because government has some automatic acceptability credibility to it that people do not want to think ill of the of the government.
So here comes Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz.
And she's on CNN and she's talking to Dana Bash, and Dana Bash didn't act like she was crazy when she heard this.
So Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, who like Hillary Clinton, ought to have been laughed out of American politics years ago.
Hillary Clinton, Trump's right, should be indicted for crying out loud and would be were she a Republican.
Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz is simply, you know, you take what she says outside the political arena, she is sued into poverty for defamation and slander, and you name it.
The woman can't tell the truth about Republicans to save her life.
But since she's in politics, she's free to say whatever she wants to say.
So the Democrats have concocted with the help of ABC News this war on women meme.
And Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, who still is the chairman of Democrat National Committee, and by the way, ask yourself why is that?
Supposedly she's this huge embarrassment.
Supposedly she won't shut up.
She makes these crazy wacko statements.
The reason they haven't gotten rid of her is that she is viewed to be effective in some places.
And admit it, folks, you run into leftists all the time to believe the most cockamy crazy stuff you can't believe.
They believe it, but they do.
About us, I mean.
They are so impressionable, it's it's uh it's not funny.
So here's Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz on CNN yesterday, telling Dana Bash that all the remaining Republican presidential candidates are trying to out Trump Donald Trump, they're saying, yeah, let's just kick women.
Let's just kick them and the immigrants out of the country.
Now, when did women end up in this?
See, they already the Democrats have made people believe that Republicans want to get rid of all the immigrants.
When all anybody's interested in here is preserving America and American culture and assimilation and legal immigration.
What everybody's up in arms about is no end in sight to open borders and illegal immigration, but the Democrats have convinced people that the Republicans want to find every immigrant there is and send them home.
And now Debbie Blabbermaus Schultz throws women in the mix, and Dana Bashis or nods.
Now, I'm not saying everybody watches this stuff's gonna believe it, but you we cannot count on the fact that people are going to hear this and laugh at it and think that this woman's an idiot.
There are gonna be people who believe it.
I don't know what percentage of Democrat voters, but I'm telling you it's probably bigger than you think.
No, she didn't jump the shark with that.
If she jumped, she should have she's jumped the shark.
I don't know how many previous comments over the years.
And by the way, you can't even find Drudge had this up.
I saw this, it was a lead item on Drudge before the program started.
You can't find it on Drudge now.
So I don't know if it's taken down because it's it's it's it's been denied or or what have you, or if it's just so outrageous or I have no idea, but uh my it's not possible for Democrats to jump the shark.
That's my whole point.
It isn't possible for that to happen.
Here's what she said.
I believe, I don't know if I've got the soundbite of this or not.
Um let me just read it, and if I do have it, I'll find it and play it for you.
But here's what she said.
She said, I believe that any one of our candidates will stand in stark contrast when it comes to the priorities of the American people and how they're going to make their decision on who they're going to vote for president.
To any of these Republican candidates.
Republicans are trying to outright wing each other.
Look, between the 15 Republican candidates who are left, all of them are out trying to out trump Donald Trump by saying, Yeah, let's kick women.
Let's kick them and immigrants out of this country.
Let's take away health care from women.
Yeah, I think any of the candidates on our side of the aisle be chosen and eventually selected as the 45th president of the United States because of that contrast.
You think that some of these Lena Dunham types are not going to believe that?
They're not only, even if they don't believe it, they're going to join the chorus and say it, because these people know that there are Democrat voters who will believe it.
And they'll spread the word on Twitter.
It'll become a whole Twitter theme.
Republicans want to kick women by all rights, the war on women is as silly as this, isn't it?
The idea that a whole political party is at war with over half the population.
And yet they've made that stick.
So if you've already established that the Republicans are engaged in a war on women, then isn't it natural that the Republicans want to kick all the women out of the country along with all the illegal immigrants?
If you if you are a mind-numbed robot, brain-dead, low information, typical average Democrat, and you already believe the impossible.
You already believe some of the craziest wacko things in the world that none of us can believe they believe.
Why would they not believe this?
Well, okay, right, even Republicans need women, and Republicans like women.
So how does the war on women work then?
You denying to me that the war on women works for these people?
As a fundraiser technique or as as a as a scare tactic technique.
It's no different.
It's no different than the way the Democrats used to always tell senior citizens the Republicans were going to Kick them out of their homes.
Who would believe that?
And they did buy.
Well, it's not that they bought it, it's they couldn't take the chance.
So they had to vote Democrat to assure themselves, because they knew the Democrats wouldn't kick them out of their homes.
Maybe they didn't really believe the Republicans would, but they couldn't take the chance of voting Republican.
That's how it works.
Anyway, I'm just saying 20 years ago, something like this, we would have the biggest laugh.
And we still could, but it's a sobering thing because we we can, I mean, I can envision the the idiots that believe this.
The Julia's, by the way, remember that ad that Obama ran, this Julia woman who can't get out of bed every day without a government program, and can't leave her government apartment every day without a government transportation card, and can't eat every day without her government food stamp,
and can't get back home without her government transportation card, and can't tend to her five flowers in her little garden without some sort of government program, and they ran an ad promoting that kind of lifestyle.
We thought this is a great ad.
They're telling everybody they want the government to totally run their lives, and then we find out that a whole lot of Democrat women thought it was a great ad.
That it really captured them and their lives.
Look at folks, it just illustrates even why there's no common ground to be had here.
And there's no grabbing these people, you know, theoretically, figuratively by the shoulders and saying, hey, wake up, wake up, wake up.
These people are to be defeated and rendered in the minority.
Anyway, there's a, you know the no labels group.
The no labels group is basically a bunch of Republican liberals.
They are Republicans who don't like conservatives, and they don't want to be associated with conservatism.
They want to be seen as intellectually elite, scholarly, uh superior, and they love being thought of as moderates.
You know why?
Because moderates, independents.
Uh, that's another thing that's happened in our political culture.
Those people have acquired the reputation of open-minded, which is intelligent.
Like those of us who are weathered to our causes, because we really believe what we're we're we're small-minded, closed-minded, we're not open to opposing points of view.
But the moderates and the independents, these are the diamonds in our culture because they make up their mind issue by issue, and they're not closed-minded, and they're not small-minded, and they're not bigoted.
Well, a bunch of these people got together and formed a club, essentially called No Labels.
And there's some former Republican speech writers in this group.
Uh, the former media director for the McCain campaign in 2008 is in this group.
And anyway, this group had an event.
It's going on right now, New Hampshire, called the No Labels event.
And Trump began his appearance at the No Labels event, which is a apparently just a uh long-winded QA with people in the audience and whoever the officials of the no labels organization happened to be.
And I heard before the program started, Trump's kicking it.
He's just doing fabulous.
So I asked Cookie to get me some sound bites of it.
And I have them here.
Let's go ahead and start with those.
Started here at Soundbite number 28.
It's in Manchester, New Hampshire, and this is at the No Labels Problem Solver Convention.
And I guess they're having a whole bunch of candidates show up at this thing.
And it was Trump's turn to speak.
And during the QA, audience members said, I was wondering what your plan is in working across the aisle to increase civic engagement among millennials, getting college students involved and also student alones.
Now that's a perfect question for somebody at the no labels event.
That's exact.
Can we all just get along?
There must be bipartisanship.
We must cross the aisle.
We must show the American people that we can work together.
We must show that we can do good government, that we can get things done.
We must, we must, we must.
And so you've got somebody in the audience asking Trump.
I was wondering what your plan is in working across the aisle to increase civic engagement among.
So what are you going to do, Mr. Trump and see to it that millennials are not so mean to each other and actually can work together with people.
Don't forget, these schools, because they get so much money from the government through the student, they're raising their fees to a point that's ridiculous.
They don't need to get that kind of money.
Because of the fact that the government is giving out so much money.
You take a look at what's happened to the cost of education, and believe me, it hasn't gone up that much.
So we're going to do a number, we're going to get those numbers down.
And also, we're going to have jobs.
So when you graduate, you're going to end up getting a nice job where you're very happy.
Okay?
Thank you.
Great question.
Okay.
So he's telling millennials they're going to be happy when he's president because they're going to have a job.
They can't find jobs right now.
Certainly they can't find career oriented jobs.
But he didn't answer the question.
You know, this this uh Mr. Trump, um what's your plan?
Get people to work together across the aisle.
He just skated right past it and went to what was important.
Another question from the audience.
I'm curious about your perspective on the freedom caucus of the team.
By the way, I should stress the no labels group is actually a bunch of libs.
They're liberal Republicans.
But they don't want to call themselves anything.
They think labels, that they're trying to be above everybody with this.
Anyway, that's the next question.
So your perspective on the freedom caucus of the Tea Party.
I love the Tea Party.
I'll tell you about the Tea Party.
These are people that love this country.
They do love this country.
And they want the country to be great.
I mean, it's very important.
Go ahead.
The issue is, not to offend anyone, but quite frankly, I see the Planned Parenthood as it's a deck chair on the Titanic.
That's where I'm coming from.
To shut down the entire government over it.
It's kind of the small world mindset.
Well, they don't want parenthood funded.
And I think a lot of people understand that, including me.
They don't want it funded.
I mean, I understand that.
So I mean, you do have that.
Yeah.
No labels booing Trump.
That's a good sign that he's being booed by the don't misunderstand this.
A quick timeout.
Don't go away.
And the final Trump bite this from the no problems.
You know what they're calling this?
They're calling it the um uh what are they calling it?
The uh uh the problem solvers convention.
The no labels problem solvers could the only problem they've ever solved is getting unemployed Republican strategists off the street.
And that's about it.
Next question from another audience member.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe you can prove me wrong, but I don't think you are a friend to women.
See how this works.
Who in the world would you look at Trump's wife and his daughters and then think the guy doesn't like women?
Are you saying yes?
Why?
Undeniable truth of life 24.
Okay, well, see, then if that's the case, then it just makes the case for undeniable truth of life number 24 being even more solid.
Snerdley is telling you damn right they can think Trump doesn't like women because the only people around Trump, women around Trump are beautiful.
And in order to really like women, you gotta be able to embrace the uglo American women too.
And if you don't, then you hate women.
And I don't doubt there's some thinking like that.
That's why I devised undeniable truth of life number 24.
Anyway, here's Trump's answer to this.
You you really are not a friend to women, Mr. Trump.
I knew I shouldn't have picked her.
I respect women incredibly.
I have had women working for me in positions that they've never worked in terms of so many different jobs.
I had a woman who was in charge of the building of Trump Tower many years ago, before anybody would have even thought of it, and did a fantastic job.
I have given women more opportunity than I would say virtually anybody in the construction industry.
I have a daughter named Ivanka and a wife named Melania who constantly want me to talk about women's health issues because they know how I feel about it.
And they know how I feel about women.
I respect women.
I love women, I cherish women.
The fact that he has to say that.
I don't know.
To me is offensive.
This whole idea that Republicans hate women, not friends to women.
And it folks, it goes deeper than abortion.
It's it's much deeper.
The war on women stuff goes far, far beyond this abortion stuff.
Because not every woman is pro-abortion, not even half of them.
Not the plan parent, not abortion as a means of contraception.
You don't have a majority of American women thinking that.
So you doubt me when I say people are going to believe Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz Republicans want to kick women out of the country when you will admit that people might have a problem with Trump because the only women that appear to be around him are pretty.
Well.
This is uh pretty odd if you ask me.
And back to the phones.
We go.
This is uh Andy and Jacksonville, Florida.
Hey, Andy, great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Well, thank you, sir.
Um, my biggest fear is Donald's not taking this seriously, and he's not taking the campaign seriously.
We would love him to run.
We would love him to win.
We all want him to.
But I don't think his heart's in the right place.
Let me guess.
I'm gonna take a wild guess as to why you're worried and why you might think that he's not taking this seriously.
And the guess is that you're really upset about the Twitter stuff every night.
I don't give a rat's butt about the Twitter stuff.
You don't care about that?
No, I don't.
I just think that the guy I love him to death.
We all talk about him.
We all want all my friends do anyway.
Well, then what makes you think he's not serious?
I I I think he's he's he's a he's a rich man that's got way too much stuff on his plate or got other stuff on his plate.
The president thing is is I wouldn't say a charade, but it's I don't think it's uh the first thing on his mind when he wakes up in the morning.
Okay, but there has to be a reason why you think this.
Is it or it maybe you're harboring a fear that it's not real, that it's all just a law.
I am harboring the fear that it's not real.
That's exactly right.
But you don't you can't put your finger on why.
It's just he seems so against type.
He's so not a politician, and he's already no, he's not.
And he can say I'm I'm sure he can do the job.
I'm sure he can do the job.
Well, I think that's why you like it.
I don't know that his heart is really in it.
I uh it may be just the showman in him, I don't know.
You don't know whether his heart is in it.
It's just he's just a showman and is uh entertaining himself with this.
That's exactly right.
Seeing how big a rise he can get out of people, and then when he gets filled and tired of it, then move on to something else.
Build another building in Beijing.
Uh once again, you are exactly right.
Well, I I I know the you're you're asking me if I if I happen to agree with you.
I don't know.
Um I'm I'm one of the people, if you go back and look, I said he'd never get in.
As recently as a few days before he got in, I didn't think he would actually pull the trigger and do it.
I thought it was what it's always been.
Uh publicity for his TV show, The Apprentice, and for whatever else he needs publicity.
The guy is into a lot.
I mean, there's Trump branded everything out there.
There's Trump branded vodka.
He stole my tie idea.
Now, wait till he's No, he's got his own brand neck ties.
He's got his own brand of uh uh well, there's all kinds of stuff out there.
Uh and it's it's some of that stuff was sold in Macy's, and that that's why Macy's did their 180 on him uh early on with the comments on the on the on the Mexicans.
Uh look, I I can't tell you for sure that I'm confident he's gonna stay in or get out.
I'm like you, I'm just watching it go by every day.
And commenting on it as it happens.
I like everybody else.
This Trump and his legitimate performance and his status as the frontrunner.
Nobody could have predicted that.
And nobody did predict it.
And I don't care who tells you they did, they didn't.
Nobody could have.
I mean, some might have predicted he would get in.
Nobody would predict that he would be number one in the polls, solid and growing from the day he announced, after having said the things that he has said, and then doubling down on the things everybody got mad at.
The thing, Andy, that tells me he's serious about this, is I have noticed not so subtle changes in the way Trump is going about this every day.
He's not making flamboyant statements nearly as frequently and as uh profoundly as he did early on.
He's still bombastic.
He still uh goes out and and and does the I'm the greatest, I'll be the greatest, it's gonna be the greatest, we're the greatest, you know, all of all of that, which is entertaining and it's inspiring too to people who want it to be the case, and to people who believe that he can make it happen.
But he is more and more issue-oriented and substantive each day.
Uh his his answers to various questions now have a little bit more depth to them.
And it's not, I don't think because he's had to study up on things.
I I think his approach is changing.
You know, you everybody you have a sense of presence, everybody does uh when you're a public figure.
And you if you're good, you know when it's time to transform and how to transform.
You know how to anticipate people's expectations, and in the case of your critics, you know how to anticipate those and confound them.
And I think every stage of the Trump campaign has been a shock to the people who have expected him to get out.
I think, for example, now Trump is much more serious on all these things that he's discussing than his early critics even thought he could be.
Early on, he was this bombastic, say anything, violator of political correctness, wasn't serious about it, doing and saying things just to get noticed, but couldn't tell you anything about foreign leaders, couldn't tell you about what was going on in the Middle East, didn't know about fracking, didn't know.
Turns out he can tell you anything you want to know about this stuff, or confidently explain to you that he will find out.
And I've I I've noticed a uh transformation in Trump that's more and more I don't want to say presidential, because now he has a fine line to walk.
I mean, his original support is based on his being outsider and fearless, outspoken outsider.
So he's got to keep some of that up.
But some at the same time, people have a vaulted respect and reverence for the office, and it's not to be played with, and it's not to be trifled with.
And so he's he is he has got he's got to go in both directions at the same time.
Now, the reason I was thinking that maybe old Andy here was not thinking Trump was serious, is because of this Twitter.
And he goes in these Twitter binges at night that uh well, they're funny.
Oh, there's no question that they're funny, but it's uh many people think they're still petty.
Uh some people think that they're childish.
I mean, I hear a lot.
if he would just stop insulting people, he'd be at 40%.
Well, now I've got people, if he just stopped tweeting every night, he'd be at 60%.
But all these tweets, and it turns out that there have been journalists embedded with him, following him around, writing stories, and they're shocked.
They're shocked the guy doesn't have a computer or a tablet in his office.
He he does all this tweeting at night on his Samsung Galaxy 6, 5, whatever it is that he's got.
He just sits there and pecks that stuff out on his Samsung Galaxy keyboard.
And then he sets it aside and goes about his business.
But he does not have a computer.
And he does not email.
He does not email.
He'll instant message, but every email that you get from him is going to come from somebody in his office.
He sends out emails, but he doesn't do them.
He doesn't have an email address.
All of his people do.
But when it comes to Twitter, Facebook, he's just in there.
Anyway, I got to brief time out here, my friends.
Much, much, much more straight ahead here on the EIB network.
Okay, so here's like I guess people send me a note.
Rush, what is this?
Republicans of the party that gave women the right to vote.
Just like it was the Republicans that ended slavery.
So you really think the low information crowd, even if you could convince them of that, is going to be moved by it?
You mean the Republicans are the ones that gave the women the right to vote?
Yeah.
Well, that was back in when, like the 1700s, screw that.
Look at the way they're treating women now, would be the reaction you would get.
And then you tell them, do you realize it was the Republican Party that was founded on the basis of ending slavery?
And Abraham Lincoln was the president during the Civil War.
Well, maybe, but that was then and this is now.
You can't find a single Republican that doesn't hate African Americans.
And that's the that's what you would get.
It's all that historical stuff, the truth, not a factor.
Let's face it, folks, that's why so many people are frustrated.
With, well, not just politics, a whole lot of uh other aspects of life.
None of those things are taught in our public school system anyway.
And if you I bet you that the whole women getting the right to vote thing in public schools today, probably implies that Republicans were the opponents.
And there's no question that public education today continues this folly, that it was the Republicans who were opposed.
I'll give you another example.
It's right out of the news today.
On Sunday, the New York Times had this huge story that 158 families in America are responsible for funding over half of the money spent on presidential campaigns.
And guess what?
They all are Republican.
So it said.
It did not mention any of the wealthy Hollywood liberal Democrats.
Do you know that the family that owns Hyatt Hotels is big socialist lib Democrat?
Just one all of Wall Street, take your pick, any Wall Street firm, nine out of ten of them, and the people that work there, multimillionaires, giving to the Democrats, not one of them.
This story was about eight or nine families that live in River Oaks in Houston, and then it had the Koch brothers in there.
Um people that live in Indian Creek down near Miami, which was said to be the richest street in America.
And the reason for the story is to continue the myth that it's the Republicans who are rich and big business when all of that has been taken over by the Democrats.
The Democrat Party is the bedmate now of big Wall Street, big pharma, and big money.
That's why Bernie Sanders is not going to be permitted to get the Democrat nomination.
But the New York Times just ran a totally bogus story about who it is that's paying for funding, underwriting presidential campaigns.
And they tried to make it out that a hundred and fifty-eight American families are running the American presidency.
And they all happen to be Republican.
You know, nobody's supposed to stop it.
Well, if that's true, how'd Obama win twice in a row?
You're not supposed to ask that question when you read the story.
It's no different the public education system today.
You still find that you can find inferences, well, there would be implications.
You can find implications that it was the Democrat Party that ended slavery, and it was the Democrat Party that protects African Americans this day, when in fact the Democrat Party was the biggest opponent to civil rights laws back in the 1960s.
And that all those Southern Democrats were segregationists.
Anyway, next up is Sharon in Cleveland.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi.
A nervous, honored first-time caller.
Great to have you here.
No need to be nervous.
As you tell, you can tell the way other callers are treated.
I'm the politest host in America.
You'll be fine.
Um what I was thinking that I talked to the guy about is that do you think that because Hillary Clinton has so much, she knows where all the bodies are buried in the Democratic Party and the Republican Party?
Because I really believe that we're to the point where there isn't anybody in Washington that's not in each other's pocket, whether it's Democrat or Republicans, but we can't get anything pushed through, anything done by the Republicans, because they're just as bad as the Democrats.
And she knows everything about everybody.
She her and her husband have been in there for so long.
Okay, look, here's here's the here's the thing about that.
I and I I know that the stories of Clinton's in the 900 FBI files, and that was true.
Uh, but if Hillary knows where the bodies are buried, then how did Obama beat her in 2008?
I think they made a deal.
Well, now I don't know, where where does that kind of theorizing stop?
What was the deal?
Well, you know, they wanted Obama in there, and they Who's they?
Republicans and Democrats, the powers to be, the people that run this country.
I think that's why Trump, we both know, that's why Trump is doing so good, because he's not one of them.
It's the same with Sarah Palin.
She wasn't one of them.
Well, wait a minute.
How do you know?
How do you know that Trump's not a creation of these people just to distract us?
It's just a feeling.
I just don't think he is.
I I think that he honestly has been part of it.
I think he's probably paid for everything he's wanted to do.
But now that he knows, you know, he knows how the game's played, and he sees what it's done to the country, and I think he's to the point where he's sick of it.
I mean, I could be wrong, but I just if these people, if the they, if Hillary Clinton knows where the bodies are buried, if Hillary Clinton has so much power over everybody, they lay down and let her do what she wants to do, how come she can't stop Trump?
I okay, I don't know.
Because I don't know.
I I You know what this is?
This is looking, I understand the Clintons in the 900 FBI files, and I understand that Clinton's got away with everything, but I'm telling you, it's like I've always said, she is not super human.
She puts her pants on one leg at a time, like all the other guys do.
She does not have any hidden source of power that allows her to achieve whatever she wants to achieve by threatening anybody else that might get in her way.
Otherwise, she would already be president.
She would not have willingly suffered the humiliation of being tossed aside by a veritable, we never heard of him, young guy who had never been in politics before.
And I doubt that she would sit idly by and allow people to construct a phony email scandal, making her look like an utter criminal.
I just, this is my my point.
We've got to get over, and you're not the only one.
I mean, there's a lot of elected Republicans that have it too.
This inordinate fear of this woman.
There's no reason for it.
It never got fear.
It's a great motivator sometimes, but it can also shut you down.
And that's what it's doing to too many people.
I'm just going to tell you, I don't think Hillary Clinton is half as smart as her reputation.
And I think she cares about one thing, aside from the power that they all, and it's money.
If you look at his emails about Benghazi that they found to her, they're all about trying to get her buddies deals and business in Libya.
She's a crony.
▲
Export Selection