All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 7, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:49
October 7, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's Anchorman has a cold.
And this is your official EIB, Anchor Baby, Mark Stein sitting in.
No supporting paperwork whatsoever.
I don't have a cold.
No matter how much theraflu I take, I still sound like this.
It's a genetic defect.
Can't do anything about it, I'm afraid.
But it is great to be with you.
We're coming to you live from Ice Station EIB in far northern New Hampshire.
If you're fleeing the country, do swing by and say hello.
You can't miss us.
There's a big sign on the highway saying last rush guest host before the board.
I'm always thrilled to see you.
Freaky Friday and Ali are looking after things down in New York.
And Mr. Snerdley was trying to be in New York to keep an eye on things.
Because we can do anything now because he's off the grid, Snerdley.
Last we heard of him, he was like, he couldn't get a flight from Florida up to New York, but he's like in a payphone, panicking.
Last work and pay phone in Florida.
He's standing there trying to monitor the show from there.
But we can do what we can talk about cricket scores.
That's how out of control this show is.
1-800-282-2882 is the number to call.
I was talking earlier about Russia's terrific bit yesterday.
I think it was yesterday's show.
He was saying what all these things have in common is that Western civilization is erasing itself.
And one of the most obvious, that's actually the way to look at it.
It's a who-whom situation.
That's all that matters.
Who whom?
That was Lenin's great formulation.
That what matters is not the justice of the cause or the facts at issue or the principles involved, but who is doing what to whom.
That's how Lenin saw things.
And that's how the left sees things.
The left sees things.
Who is doing what to whom?
So if a gay group is aggrieved because a Christian baker won't bake them a gay wedding cake, you should be on the side of big gay because they're the identity group that trumps these benighted, knuckle-dragging, Neanderthal Christian, homophobic bakers.
But if it was a gay group complaining because a Muslim baker in Dearborn, Michigan wouldn't bake them a gay wedding cake, wouldn't bake them a gay wedding backlava, then it all gets a bit more complicated because then it's the Muslim guys who are on top, so big gay have to take a back seat.
This is how it almost, this is how, for example, why they don't care about that the war on women means Todd Aiken saying something.
The war on women doesn't mean all these women being raped and sold into sex slavery in Iraq and kidnapped by Boko Haram and all that, because it's the who-whom thing.
It's like when you've got, if it's the choice between American military power preventing the women from being raped in Iraq, then the bad guys are American military power.
So it's tough and the women in Iraq just to put up with being raped.
And likewise, if it's the Nigerian schoolgirls, you can hand up a big pouty hash cardboard hashtag like Mrs. Obama did saying bring back our girls.
And that's fine.
But if you were to actually send special forces in to rescue the girls, then it's bad because it's then it's, you know, the American military power against the forces of third world guerrillas, and you should be on the side of third world guerrillas.
It's all who whom.
Who whom, as Lenin used to say, who's doing what to whom.
And once you know that, you know the side you ought to be on.
The side you ought to be on is not the side of Western civilization.
You see that most particularly when it comes to climate change.
We're about to go to the big climate conference in Paris next month.
There is a beautiful, a thing of beauty that happened yesterday.
Ted Cruz absolutely demolished the head guy of the Sierra Club, who is a fellow called Aaron Mayer.
He was testifying at some Senate committee or other, and Ted Cruz was grilling him and asked him about the satellite data.
The guy didn't know anything.
And he had to keep leaning back and be fed lines.
It was this stilted conversation where Ted Cruz would ask a question.
There'd be a long pause while the guy leaned his head back and was fed the line by one of his minders.
He's a classic boutique liberal, this guy.
Aaron Mayer.
Remember his name, M-A-I-R.
He's president of the Sierra Club, and he has one talking point, one little talking point that he kept reiterating over and over, like he had environmental Tourette's.
He could only repeat his little verbal tick that 97% of the scientists were agreed on this climate change thing, which isn't true, by the way.
My book demolishes this 97%.
My new book, I've written a book, it's called A Disgrace to the Profession.
And it's about the most influential science graph of the 21st century, the hockey stick, and the guy who invented it, and the big climate alarmism industry that has grown up around it.
And the idea that 97% of scientists or 97% of climate scientists support this is nonsense and is demolished in the final chapter of my book.
But this guy doesn't care about evidence.
He's got his talking point and he's got his little talking point.
And even when he's in a congressional, he's giving testimony in a Senate inquiry.
And you would think there would be minimum standards for that because he's the head of the Sierra Club.
So that would be like the expert witness in a trial.
And if someone decides to bring in an expert witness in a court, you're allowed to probe, to test his expert credentials.
And if they'd done that with this guy, they would have discovered what Ted Cruz made plain, that he doesn't know anything.
He doesn't know anything beyond his two or three talking points, which is fine when you're going on some, you know, the view and you've got your two or three talking points.
But if you're supposed to be testifying to Congress, you're supposed to know stuff.
And he was doing this 97%, this 97% of scientists are supporting anthropogenic global warming or whatever you say.
They never explain what it is the 97% is that I actually explain.
My book is actually full of climate scientists.
I think it's 120 climate scientists, absolutely, some of whom believe in global warming and others who are opposed to it, but they're all opposed.
What they're united in opposition to is this kind of big climate soundbite alarmism that this guy was peddling in Congress yesterday.
And my book's about the hockey stick being taken up by Al Gore and put in his movie and then being used to justify the Kyoto Treaty and the creation of this 21st century alarmism industry that is now going to reach its apogee at the Paris conference next month when essentially using climate as a pretext for global government.
And just to bring it back to where we started here, it's again, it's about Western civilization erasing itself.
Naomi Klein, a compatriot of mine, she's from Canada and she wrote a big selling book about essentially environmentalism and they've now made a film about it, which is not going to be as big as an inconvenient truth because it's far more boring even than Al Gore's movie,
but where she effectively comes out of the closet and she says, yes, this is about using environmentalism as a pretext to destroy the free market economies, individual liberty, and all the rest of it.
It's the classic watermelon strategy, green on the outside, deep socialist red on the inside.
And this fellow, Ted Cruz, took him apart.
It's a thing of beauty.
I wish Ted Cruz was virtually invisible in the last debate, but this was absolutely Ted Cruz at his best.
And he rightly pointed out that there has been no global warming now for 18 years.
In other words, if you've got a kid who's celebrating their 18th birthday and just become an adult, they've been fed this their entire lives for the entire 18 years of their childhood, and there in fact has been no warming, no warming.
And this guy from the Sierra Club, Aaron Mayer, couldn't answer any of the questions and just kept going on about this 97% consensus.
And as I say, in my book, A Disgrace to the Profession, it's called, but we take apart, among the fascinating things in that book, we do take apart this 97% consensus nonsense, because it's not true.
My book quotes hundreds of scientists who all disagree with these egregious big climate alarmists, the sky is falling types.
They're embarrassed by people like Aaron Mayer who claim to know.
They claim to be experts in this subject and they know nothing about it.
It's what the Sierra Club does.
The Sierra Club is an environmental organization and global warming is a threat to the environment.
Yet in the end, its own president knows nothing about it.
Because boutique liberalism isn't about facts, it's about feeling.
If you've got the right feelings on a subject, so if you feel warm and fluffy towards gays or women or the poor or blacks or the climate, the environment, that matters far more than whether what you do actually harms and hurts the thing you profess to have all these warm and fluffy feelings for.
And climate change, we're now coming up to this big Paris conference.
Last time around, it was Copenhagen, and we were very lucky because the whole ClimateGate email scandal broke.
That's also in my book, by the way.
The fact that the people behind the scenes knew there was a global warming pause, knew there'd been no warming since 1998, but they didn't want to tell us.
They told each other.
They emailed themselves back and forth.
A guy called Kevin Trenberth, who's a big American climate scientist, he said in these emails, it's a disgrace that we don't know why there's been no warming since 1998.
He actually, Kevin Trenberth, Michael Mann, all these other big climate scientists, they discussed it all in private, but they wouldn't say it in public.
Because otherwise, they know that the know-nothing guys like Aaron Mayer, this Sierra Club president Ted Cruz talked about, they know that these know-nothing guys will get all confused.
They want simple, childish slogans like what this idiot was repeating in Congress.
Oh, well, there's a 97% consensus.
There's a 97% consensus.
There's a 97% consensus.
Can you give my needle a nudge on the record?
Because I think it's a bit stuck.
There's a 97% consensus.
That's all they have.
And the reason they're doing this, the reason they take the side of climate change is because it's all about feelings.
And if liberal feelings have to be directed against their civilizational inheritance, it's all part of erasing Western civilization at every opportunity.
And Rush's point is right.
If you look at any story in the news, take any story you want and see which is the side that is committed to protecting and defending what is proud of our civilizational inheritance.
What takes pride in creating the most developed civilization that has ever existed on earth, where people are free to live their lives to the fullest potential.
And if you look at any issue, the left is always on the side that wants to trash that civilizational inheritance.
Mark Stein in Farush 1-800-282-2882.
Hey, Mark Stein, in Farush at the Golden EIB microphone.
Let's go to Amy in Los Angeles, California.
Amy, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh show.
Great to have you with us.
Hey, Mark, thanks for taking my call.
I have a different view on Kevin McCarthy's remarks because I watched it live.
I heard all this hubbub going on and I went back online to listen to the Sean Hannity interview again.
And it seems to me he was describing a side effect of the Benghazi hearings, not the purpose of them.
And I think we're just buying into the media, continuing to twist Republican words and dumping on McCarthy.
I don't think that's the right interpretation.
Well, look, I'm always happy not to play the media game when they go, you know, look a squirrel and we all chase after it.
But with the best will in the world, McCarthy said this stuff when he was on Fox talking to Sean Hannity.
And Sean asked him a question, a very broad question that actually started with the Cromnibus funding, which was another fiasco from the Republicans.
And McCarthy then said, what you're going to see is a conservative speaker that takes a conservative Congress that puts a strategy in to fight and win.
And let me give you one example.
Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?
But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee.
What are her numbers today?
Her numbers are dropping.
So he wasn't talking about it as a side effect.
No one had mentioned Benghazi.
He introduced Ben.
He was the one who linked Benghazi with Hillary Clinton's poll numbers, Amy.
The word had never occurred in the interview before that point.
Well, I still think that he was, I think the words are being parsed from that, but I see your point, but I have a different view.
So I want to.
Well, you're entitled to your view, Amy.
But look, let's pair that back and say that you could have that if you were being interviewed on Sean Hannity's show on Fox or if I was or someone else.
But this is a guy whose job, who's going to be the most prominent Republican until Election Day in the United States, most powerful Republican.
He has to know what he's saying when he's in front of a microphone, doesn't he?
Yes, I agree, and perhaps he could have done that better.
But I think he was also trying to show that there are Republicans in Congress doing stuff.
And I think showing that Benghazi is being looked at and that it's uncovered a lot of stuff and that Clinton isn't being helped by that.
I don't think that is saying that this was just a partisan political game.
Well, you and I will have to disagree on that, Amy.
The point is, this is he's running for whatever it is, the third most powerful position in the United States of America, which is the most powerful nation on earth.
And there's like 300 million people in this country.
And it's the minimum job requirement that you ought to be able to think what it is you're saying before you open your mouth.
Now, there's all kinds of things that people say that I don't care about.
You know, when Trump says, oh, Mexico's sending us all our rapists, I don't care about that.
When Trump says, I like guys who are, I like war veterans who don't get captured.
I don't care about that.
I don't care when Jeb is supposedly in trouble for saying that stuff happens about Oregon.
These kind of things politicians say all the time.
You're out there, you're on the stump, somebody asks you something, and you say something, and it's not quite carefully enough formulated.
But this guy is supposed to be running for a job where this is what he does.
Framing issues and advancing the Republican agenda is what he does.
And this is how he framed Benghazi, Amy.
You're right.
There's a difference between a presidential campaign and a campaign cycle versus someone who's in office.
And you're right.
Well, I hope he's...
And do you support this guy as he's coming up?
Well, you know, I'm a strong California Republican, so I actually do know of who Kevin McCarthy is.
And I think as a whole, he's great.
I think as a California, as an LA Republican, there's a lot of us out here that are so sick and tired of being treated like an ATM by both parties.
They fly in, they do their fundraising, and they leave, and they completely ignore us.
And I think they make a huge mistake ignoring California.
So from that point of view, I'm you'd like a California guy in there.
I'm a senior guy in there.
And, you know, there's a lot of good conservative Republicans out here.
Reagan's California.
No, no, no, I know.
I love it.
I go and speak in Orange County once every couple of years.
They always give me the best time out there, and they're terrific people.
But sometimes, sometimes, when you give hostages to fortune like this, Amy, then there is a price that has to be paid for it.
This was an unforgivably stupid gift to hand your political opposition, and that's why Trey Gowdy's furious with it.
Mark Stein for Rush, more straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for Rush, he has a cold.
He has a cold, so his voice sounds funny today.
Not as funny as mine, but funny enough for him to want to stay home, put his feet up, take it easy, and have a theraflu or two.
And he will be back tomorrow with full strength, authentic, all-American excellence in broadcasting.
Don't forget, you can always go to rushlimbore.com and become a Rush 24-7 subscriber.
And then, you know, what do you care about, guest hosts?
You can listen to Rush any time of the day.
And if you feel he's got a cold coming on, you can say nuts to that, and you can go and find some more mellifluously sounding little bit from the archives that will not so distress you as Rush when he's got a bit of a frog in his throat.
So you go to rushlimbo.com, you become a Rush 24-7 subscriber.
There's all kinds of other stuff there.
You got a link to the latest Rush Revere book, and you can subscribe to the Limbaugh letter too, where they've got a terrific interview with Victor Davis Hansen, who talks almost as much sense as Rush.
He's like, must be number three or four in America when it comes to talking more sense than anybody else.
And that's all at rushlimbaugh.com.
I love the stuff that the left worries about.
The CNN, Donna Brazil, who is a hell of a survivor, actually, it's amazing to me.
She was there all through the Clinton era.
Now she's still on TV at CNN.
Why the Roberts Court is scary?
I think the Roberts Court is scary too.
This is the Chief Justice who twisted himself into a pretzel to justify Obamacare.
This is the Anthony Kennedy's court that voted 5-4 to overturn the definition of marriage as it has prevailed throughout human history.
I find the Roberts Court scary, but that's not why Donna Brazil finds it scary.
She thinks it's scary because of minority rights and because the Supreme Court is going to gut part of the Voting Rights Act.
And it is amazing the way.
Again, I'm assuming that this is coming from Hillary.
Hillary's got to do something.
She's got to get hold of.
She's just got to gin the base up on the war on women, war on minorities, something.
She needs to do something to reverse the slide in her numbers that is happening in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Bernie Sanders is real.
He's a real phenomenon.
He's not just the anyone but Hillary character that people think he is.
He's actually got a constituency there and he's authentically serving that constituency.
Who is Hillary's constituency?
Hillary's constituency is, you know, fat Saudi sheikhs who are prepared to give her husband tons of money to give a speech.
Hillary isn't anybody except an entitlement candidate.
She's basically, I was complaining about Angela Merkel in Germany the other day, but you say what you like about Angela Merkel.
At least she became Chancellor of Germany on her own ticket, not just because she's some career sex fiend's enabling wife, which is basically the reason why Hillary feels she's entitled to be president.
But Hillary is going nowhere.
And it's not even the email scandals.
I mean, I think, in a strange way, the email scandal is a distraction from the fact that Hillary would be an awful candidate, even if there was nothing going on.
And they're frantic to shore her up now.
So on the one hand, the Oppo research guys are saying, well, you know, they're doing this warning thing to Joe Biden.
Well, you get in the race.
We're going to bring up some of your early abortion votes.
He voted to repeal Roe v. Wade in 1982, Joe Biden.
And that's the kind of thing that's like, what is that, 33 years ago?
That's a third of a century ago.
They're going to be dragging up votes from Joe Biden that are not where the Democrat Party is now from 1982.
You could still be a pro-life Democrat in 1982.
It wasn't.
It was only, you know, whatever it is, nine years after Roe v. Wade.
You could still be a pro-life Democrat.
But they're going to be dragging up all these votes from 1989.
They're saying, you get in the race, you are not going to know what hid you.
We're the Clinton machine.
Remember what we did to Barack Obama?
Okay, well, never mind that.
That didn't work out so well.
But remember what we normally do to these guys, and we're going to do it to you.
And so they're doing that on the one hand.
And on the other hand, they're running these, you know, phony non-issues to energize the baits.
Why the Roberts Court is scary?
Because it might require a form of picture ID.
Requiring a driver's license to vote is the most popular form of voter ID.
But millions of Americans don't drive or can't afford a driver's license.
They can't afford a driver's license.
And in some places, it can be a hundred-mile drive to the nearest Department of Motor Vehicles.
You can get a thing that looks like a driver's license that is exactly the same as a driver's license and is a non-driver's form of state-issued ID.
You don't have to take a test for it.
It's not like you have to show that you're not blind or whatever.
You just get that anyway.
You need ID to get into a Hillary Clinton campaign meeting.
You need to, in other words, for the citizenry to be ushered into the presence of the woman who wants to lead your country and be your citizen executive.
You, the humble peasant citizen, need not just a piece of ID, but you need to undergo a background check to be ushered into Hillary Clinton's presence.
But when it comes to the sanctity of the ballot, the most vital, essential part of citizenship, a responsibility of citizenship in a free society, that you are the person who is entrusted with selecting the government of that country, because it is a government, it is self-government in which you, the people, select those who govern you.
Then you don't need any ID for that.
It would be outrageous to say, it would be outrageous to say to someone, oh, you need to show your driver's license for that.
You need to show your driver's license to get into a Hillary Clinton campaign event.
You need to show your driver's license to get into an attorney general, federal attorney general press conference where he's denouncing the need to show your driver's license as racist.
You need to show your driver's license to get on a plane.
You need to show your driver's license to get into a lot of office buildings in American cities these days.
You need to show ID to check into a hotel.
But you don't need to show ID when you vote.
And that's what Donna Brazil is saying, why the Roberts Court is scary.
You need to show ID to vote in every developed country on earth.
But it's only hatey, hateful haters.
This is the desperation.
This is the desperation of the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Why not let it go?
Why not just run with Bernie Sanders and have a gay old socialist time of your life arguing for $20 trillion of new entitlement program?
Go for it.
Go on the most almighty Bernie Bender and have the time of your life.
And that's the choice that's facing the Republican, the Democrat Party.
It's simply no fun.
It's no fun having Hillary.
It doesn't do anything for them.
Doesn't sort of get their juices going.
It's not like the libertarian candidate in Florida sacrificing the goat and drinking its blood.
When you drain the juices of the Hillary Clinton campaign, it just leaves a sour, bitter aftertaste.
They don't care about the emails.
Clinton scandals come baked in.
They don't care that she's on the take from Saudi princes giving money to her rotten foundation.
They don't care that the foundation spends 94% of its money on so-called expenses.
So that if you give $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation because you're all concerned about diarrhea in Africa, only $6,000 of the $100,000 donation goes to diarrhea in Africa.
The other $94,000 is just all sluiced up flying Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea around the world.
And there's all the people there, they're drowning in the diarrhea in Africa because they thought they got the big donation of $100,000 and only $6,000 is going to diarrhea in Africa.
Why get swashed away by Clinton Foundation African diarrhea when you can have the romance of your lives with the Bernie Sanders campaign?
The desperation of the Hillary Clinton campaign as her numbers sag, sag, sag.
Because right now, absent anything else, she's going to be testifying on Benghazi.
She's got the drip, drip, drip of scandal and lack of enthusiasm, and he's on course to win Iowa and New Hampshire, and all bets are off.
Then the Bernie bandwagon is really going to go for it.
Mark signing for Rush.
We'll take your calls straight ahead.
Let's go to Dale in Ventura, California.
Dale, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
Hi, Mark.
I disagree with your last caller in Los Angeles.
I'm in the next county over.
Kevin McCarthy is not a conservative.
His voting record with conservative view is F-rating.
He's only voted as a conservative 45% of the time, which means 55% of the time he's a liberal.
All we're going to get with him is a repeat of Boehner without the crying.
So Craig Gowdy was right to be upset with him because his comments do undermine the investigation.
Yeah, no, he's right.
And without the fabulous perma tan of John Boehner, because Kevin McCarthy comes from California, whereas John Boehner is in famously sun-drenched Ohio.
John Boehner had the big tan and he does all the crying.
So, you know, who's it going to be if it's not going to be Kevin McCarthy then, Dale?
Well, I'm hoping that it's going to be an ultra-conservative.
The fact of the matter is this country has gone so far to the left that unless we put an ultra-conservative in to drag us back to the middle where we have a happy medium, we're not going to be getting anywhere.
We're just going to be going in reverse.
Absolutely right.
What you need is someone, you don't need politics, as I've said on this show before, you don't need politicians who move toward the center.
You need politicians who move the center toward them, as Ronald Reagan and Mrs. Thatcher did.
And that's right, Dale.
I mean, do you think, what's worrying to me about this McCarthy business, right?
Nobody had heard of this guy.
Most people don't know who he is.
But he was next in line after Eric Cantor got knocked out in his congressional race in the primary.
So he's supposed to be next in line for the throne.
And these remarks of his are reckoned to be not a disqualifying comment.
In other words, he's still on course to be Speaker, Dale.
Well, I hope they do eliminate him.
We need more conservatives, somebody with an A or B reading, or excuse me, rating like Daniel Webster.
But on top of that, Kevin McCarthy is a Los Angeles Republican, which really means he's a liberal.
And this is not going to help our country.
It's going to be a total repeat of everything.
Everything's going to just be the same.
Nothing's going to be changed.
It doesn't matter if we get a Republican into the White House because I think the election of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker is going to so turn off the Republican Party, you're going to have people sitting out the election again.
Yeah, I wouldn't put that past.
There was a, Ronald Reagan was a California Republican, Dale.
What's happened in the last 35 years?
Well, Ronald Reagan was not of the establishment.
Kevin McCarthy is and will remain a member of the establishment elite.
He's going to do whatever he can do to stay in power and keep that money flowing to himself.
But the other big point, Dale, is that California's demographics have changed.
they have changed dramatically.
Ronald Reagan couldn't get it.
California used to be a provider of American presidents, Nixon and Reagan.
And not anymore, because its demographics have totally changed over the last 40 years.
You've had a big influx of Hispanic immigration, and this is why a lot of Republicans outside California are terrified that they're going to end up with the same choice of Democrat light that Republicans have to make up for.
You have all these guys like Schwarzenegger.
When Schwarzenegger got elected, he was going to be, what did they call him, the governator.
He was going to be the governator because he was going to terminate programs.
He couldn't terminate a thing.
Nobody can name a single thing that Schwarzenegger accomplished while he was governor of California.
But he ran on this sort of, oh, you know, I'm fiscally conservative but socially liberal.
In other words, all the icky, embarrassing bits about conservatives don't, and don't worry, I'm not like that.
I'm just fiscally conservative but socially liberal.
And it turns out that when you do that, all the fiscal liberalism comes with a hell of a price tag.
And what has happened to California is that it has been so demographically transformed over the last 40 years that you cannot get a real conservative Republican elected in Sacramento.
And as you say, when you send a California Republican to Washington to be Speaker, that's going to have a very depressing effect on a lot of the conservative base.
That's true because they gerrymandered the districts in such a way so that the coastal people, which are predominantly liberal, encompass the majority of the districts.
And they've left the Republican districts to be small zones, so it's hard to get a Republican into office.
The other problem is the fact that California has now allowed illegal aliens to get driver's licenses.
And that just means they're going to be that much easier to register to vote because they're not going to follow up a check on it.
They have a driver's license, and now you've got, and it's upwards, and I don't believe any of the numbers, but it's upwards in California.
It's got to be close to 20% of the population.
That's 40 million, which means there's about 8 million illegals in the state.
You're absolutely right, Dale.
I've got to go.
But on that last point, on that last point, that's the insanity of the world we live in.
Donna Brazil says it would be totally, totally racy, racy, racist to require somebody to produce a driver's license when they go to vote.
You shouldn't have to have any ID when you go to vote.
But if you're in the country illegally, you should have all the official government ID you want and you need to function.
That's the insanity of what Rush calls the war on Western civilization.
Markstein for Rush, more straight ahead.
New Quinnipiac poll out today says 59% of Florida voters say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
61% of Ohio voters say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
61% of Pennsylvania voters say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
As the computer guys would say, that's not a bug, it's a feature.
That goes with the territory.
You know, they've done Saudi Arabia.
73% of Clinton donor shakes would say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
But that's what we like about her.
▲
Export Selection