All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 6, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:23
October 6, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You know, I knew it.
I knew it when I woke up today, I knew I'd coming down with something, and I was just I jinxed myself.
I was just thinking, made it been even yesterday.
How long it's been since I've had a cold.
It's been a long time.
I woke up today, got that thing in my throat, actually at the top of the chest, the bronchial tubes, it's moving up.
You probably can't tell because the audio sound processing we use here.
But I'm my voice is always very, very weak here.
If it weren't for the magical audio processing and compression that we use, you could probably tell.
So anyway, I I it just ticks me off.
I do everything I can just to not get a cold.
I make sure I smoke plenty of cigars, because nicotine, nicotine is the thing that does it.
I'm telling you, in my case, it's what wards off the common cold virus.
You know, I used to smoke cigarettes and I quit, and I had a cold for four straight months.
Could not get over one.
I had to go on a cruise to give my voice a rest.
That was incredible.
So at any rate, uh, I'm not complaining, I'm just advising you folks.
Sometimes when this happens, uh various forms of fatigue sweep over me during the course of the program, and when that happens, things can get a little giddy.
So just a little heads up.
Besides all that, it's great to have you here.
Telephone number if you want to be on the programs 800-282-2882, the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Did you see?
Did you see where Hillary Clinton wants victims of gun violence to be able to sue gun manufacturers now?
And she is promising that she's elected president.
She's going to use executive orders to get rid of guns or do something.
She's going to use executive orders to manifest some kind of sweeping gun control legislation.
Now, following the logic of allowing the victims of gun violence to sue the gun manufacturer.
Should Babe Ruth have been allowed to sue Hillary and Bradsby every time he struck out?
They're gonna regret that analogy.
I guarantee.
Or try this.
Does that mean that the families of the Benghazi victims will be allowed to sue Hillary?
I mean, if we're gonna go out and try to find and be able to sue the people responsible for making victims victims, and in this case, Hillary thinks it's the gun.
Well then could the Benghazi victims be allowed to sue Hillary and sue Obama?
I'm to the Benghazi families have a lot more of a case than the gun manufacturers do.
In fact, why why didn't Hillary and Obama just blame Ben Ghazi on the guns?
I mean, we have four dead Americans.
We had terrorists using weapons and guns and why didn't they blame the guns there?
No, I'm I look, I know it sounds facetious, but I'm being half serious here.
If guns kill people, why not blame guns for what happened in Benghazi?
Instead, they blamed a stupid video that nobody ever saw.
You know when it when it comes to this kind of thing, look what they do.
They blame a video for what?
Creating anger and behavioral problems in a mass number of people who then go out and get guns and start shooting people.
Isn't it amazing that when the same set of circumstances here, like take the shooter in Oregon, what did he watch?
What did he see?
And where did he watch it and see it that made him want to go get his guns and start shooting people?
If it works for Benghazi, in other words, a video, then why does it work in Oregon?
Why doesn't it work in North Carolina with Dylan Root?
Why doesn't it work anywhere else?
Only in America.
Is it the gun's problem?
It's never the gun's problem in the Middle East.
Or the gun is never at fault.
The left always can find a way to blame people when they want to.
When they don't want to blame people, they'll blame the gun.
But they're never consistent with this.
Why are we bombing ISIS?
Why don't we just bomb their weapons?
I thought if the weapon is the problem, if the guns, I don't care what kind of guns, if it's the missiles, I don't care what kind of missiles, if it's bombs, I don't care what kind of bombs it's if it if it's the inanimate object, then why don't we start attacking the bombs and the guns, and why don't we start suing the people that manufacture the weapons that ISIS is using?
No, I'm telling you, I'm being half serious.
I'm trying to illustrate a point.
Here you have a school shooting in Oregon, and right off the bat it's the gun, and we gotta get rid of the gun.
The shooter is his own kind of victim in the left's world.
In the case of uh Benghazi, we had some stupid video maker that nobody ever heard of, who supposedly made a video that nobody ever saw, and that was blamed.
Even the families of those killed in Benghazi were told it was a video that did it.
Not the terrorists.
Not the guns.
It was the video that did it.
And the video is credited with turning rational people irrational and made them go get guns and kill people.
And we even found a way to put the maker of the video, the producer of the video, in jail.
Where I think he still languishes, if I'm not mistaken.
Side issue.
If I'm wrong about that, doesn't count against the accuracy rating because it's not an opinion.
But regardless, do you see the inconsistencies here?
And if you do, do you understand them?
In the United States of America, the left has a has a desire.
That's to get rid of all guns, and so that every shooting that happens here is the fault of the gun.
If the gun weren't there, the shooting wouldn't have happened, the crime wouldn't have taken place.
But in war or in an event like Benghazi, where the administration clearly is to blame and is complicit, the weapons are irrelevant in the death of four Americans.
No, some innocuous video that did it.
Now the only point of bringing this up is to point out the hypocrisy and the and the and the intellectual dishonesty of these people to try to illustrate what the real motive is.
And that is the continued drip drip drip drip drip drip drip drip loss of liberty and freedom.
The Afghan hospital.
You know, you know, if you heard the we we bombed his hospital yesterday or recently, and there were I think 19 deaths.
19 deaths, three of them were children.
Why don't we blame the bombs?
And if you heard the Afghanis, or no, one of our generals is saying the Afghans asked us to hit that hospital.
It's never our fault when Obama is in charge is never our fault.
Now the Afghanis asked us to hit that hospital.
But even so, why not blame the bomb?
How come we're not going after the person that dropped the bomb or the person that ordered the bomb dropped?
We're trying to shift blame whatever it can't be Obama, whatever.
I just think these glaring inconsistencies here need to be pointed out.
And again, what's the purpose?
The quest is to just I know it seems pointless, maybe fruitless, but the effort is to try to convince as many people who are caught up in all this that the gun is the problem that it isn't, and to be vigilant and understand why they should not fall for it.
That's the whole point, folks.
See if it works.
I have three stories here.
The headlines are enough.
Workers remove Ten Commandment Monument from Oklahoma City Capitol grounds at 10.30 p.m. to keep protesters from demonstrating.
Next headline, pork products face workplace ban for being offensive, and the next headline, school cancels America Day.
Fourth headline, do you know what the Fastest growing language in the United States is.
Nope, it's Arabic.
Fastest growing language, fastest growing, not the most spoken.
fastest growing language in the United States is Arabic.
Here's here's another headline.
World's first lesbian bishop calls for church to remove crosses and to install Muslim prayer space instead.
There is a creep creep creep creep creep that is happening throughout Western nations, Western cultures, and Western civilization countries.
It is a creep creep creep creep creep.
Through various means, illegal immigration, normal immigration, intimidation, political correctness, what have you.
But Western civilizations are pretty much in the process of erasing themselves.
In my view, anyway.
The people who wish to erase Western civilization, in many cases, are not even firing a shot.
Some are, such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda and all that, but the illegal immigrants are not firing a shot.
La Raza is not firing a shot.
Number of the domestic upheavals in this country are happening not because of any kind of force.
They're happening because of political correctness, fear, intimidation, you name it.
First story, U.S. Daily Mail, a granite monument of the Ten Commandments that has sparked controversy since its installation on the Oklahoma Capitol grounds was removed late yesterday.
It'll be transported to a private conservative think tank for storage.
A contractor the state hired began removing the monument shortly after 10.30 last night.
The removal of the Ten Commandments monument comes after the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision in June that the display violates a state constitutional prohibition on the use of public public property to support any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion.
We are a Christian nation, Judeo-Christian ethic.
We were founded and established that way, and we are erasing ourselves.
We are allowing it to happen under the guise of religious freedom.
Except it's not religious freedom that's making this happen because a religious freedom is also under assault and could be said to be suffering defeats.
Try employing your religious freedom if you're a county clerk in Kentucky.
Try using your religious freedom if you're a pizzeria or a bakery or what have you in Indiana.
Southern California or Colorado.
You'll find that your religious freedom doesn't mean anything.
But in the name of religious freedom, the Ten Commandments monument must come down so as not to offend anybody who doesn't believe in them.
It used to be our country.
I mean, this is what was the United States.
This was how it was funded.
Now this found in the melting pot, I guess.
The people who believe this country was founded in an immoral way is immoral, is unjust, and has been for over 200 years, must engage in all this to erase its history of racism, slavery, discrimination, or whatever.
In other words, the United States has been flawed from the get-go, and it's time now to fix it.
And every precept and principle on which the nation was founded was discriminatory, bigoted, or what have you, and so must not stand.
And the melting pot used to be people coming here wanting to become Americans.
Now it seems like people are coming here trying to erase America.
And many who live in America are actually doing the erasing.
Next headline, Breitbart, communal workplace kitchens.
Communal Workplace what is a communal workplace kitchen?
Does that mean like our little kitchen in here?
I mean, we're a workplace.
It's the communal that has what is that?
Communal.
Does it mean that we have to open it up to people outside the office here?
Well, whatever it means, here's the story.
Communal workplace kitchens may soon face a ban on pork products like sausage rolls and ham sandwiches over fears that they are offensive to certain faiths.
See how guilty we are, folks?
Ham sandwiches is a sign of the bigotry that this nation is, always has been and has become.
New guidelines posted by actually this is I I think a UK story, but whatever, it doesn't matter.
I mean, the the things happening at Western nations in Europe are tantamount to happening here too.
New guidelines proposed by Coexist House, a US and UK-based interfaith group, which means it's a leftist group disguised as religious group.
Coexist House, a US and UK-based interfaith group, urges employers to consider the rules of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and Sikhism, as well as new religions like Scientology.
It warns bosses to be sensitive to workers' religions before allowing ham products to be stored or prepared alongside other products.
You know who's jealous about this is the vegans.
The vegans, they've had to share refrigerators with meat eaters and all of this time.
All they would have had to do was make a religious argument about it, and the meat people would have had to remove their stuff, leaving the fridge exclusively for the use of the vegans.
But now here come these other religions saying, we don't like pork, we don't like ham, you gotta get it out of the fridge.
You can't even have it in the kitchen if we're gonna be there.
And we're saying, okay, okay, we'll get rid of it.
The Brits are saying, fine.
We don't want to offend you.
We also suggest that alcohol should not be served at corporate events in case it upsets the feelings of members of certain faiths.
Andy Denham, professor of faith in public policy at Goldsmiths University of London's preparing the guidelines that'll be put forward to employers this week.
He told us Sunday Times.
Yeah, it'd be good etiquette to avoid heating up foods that might be prohibited for people of other faiths.
The microwave's example is a good one.
We also say don't put kosher or halal and other special foods next to another food or God forbid on the same plate.
You cannot do that.
October 5, 2015, Fox News Todd Starnes, Patriotic Teenagers, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, showed up to class waving American flags in defiance of educators who canceled America Day over fears it might upset students who do not consider themselves to be Americans.
I want you to listen to this lead again.
Patriotic teenagers, Jackson Hole, Wyoming showed up in class waving American flags in defiance of educators who canceled America Day over fears it might upset students who don't consider themselves to be American.
I guess, ladies and gentlemen, it's too late to ask what non-Americans are doing at a school in Jackson Hole, Wyoming?
Or why American taxpayers are paying to educate non-Americans, and then why we are deferring to non-Americans who are offended by the American flag in an American school?
You know what this really epitomizes?
This illustrates the difference between immigrants in the past and those of today.
Immigrants in the past came here to be Americans.
They loved the American flag.
They wanted that flag to fly above them.
They revered, respected, and honored that flag.
They could not wait to assimilate.
They could not wait to become citizens.
They could not wait to wave that flag as their own.
They would have jumped at the chance to engage in an American Day.
Why do we even need an America Day in the first place?
Well, regardless, immigrants of old would have jumped at the chance to participate in a day celebrating America.
But today, immigrant students who are non-Americans are offended, don't want to see the flag, and what do the school administrators do?
Okay, okay, okay, okay, don't shoot.
We'll take it down.
Don't bomb.
We'll take it down.
One little tidbit about Jackson Hole, Wyoming America Day was part of a homecoming tradition at the Haskrill students would show up to class, either waving American flags or wearing red, white, and blue clothing.
And many different students felt singled out.
They're not American, and they just felt weird.
They felt inferior.
They felt like they were being left out.
Here's an American celebrating and something they're not American.
Very unfortunate.
So school says we're trying to be inclusive and safe and make everybody feel well safe.
I tell you what.
Well, can't say they're not firing shots, but it's fear.
We're in a total defensive, fearful position.
Okay, okay, okay.
And we and we engage in this under the guise of being open-minded and politically correct, but it's fear.
Anyhow, um, from Breitbart, world's first lesbian bishop.
And by the way, for all this other political stuff, I mean, we got we got the political news.
We got Biden talking to Maureen Dowd about his son saying run for president.
Oh, it seems to be a big news.
It's captivated the attention here of the drive-by's.
Trump dropping in the polls got everybody, I mean, you wouldn't believe the orgasms in the uh Republican establishment and media taking place over that.
And some other things out there.
You know, all of that really, I know it's important.
It's secondary to me to this stuff.
And we can sit around and debate, you know, what people say running for president and all that.
But while all that's happening, this cultural deprivation and rot and the erasing of Western civilization is happening.
Right under our nose.
Right in front of our eyes.
I mean, we're looking at it.
We are not only looking at it, we are enabling it.
The bishop of Stockholm has proposed a church in her diocese, remove all signs of the cross, and put down markings showing the direction to Mecca for the benefit of Muslim worshippers.
Eva Brunn, who was made the world's first openly lesbian bishop by the Church of Sweden in 2009, and has a young son with her wife and fellow lesbian priest, Gunilla Linden, made the suggestion to make those of other faiths more welcome.
A, she cannot have a son with her wife.
But I'm the one that's going to get in trouble for pointing that out.
It's not biologically possible.
But anyway, again, I don't want to make a big deal out of that.
But...
So is it has anybody is this what Muslims do?
Um in their churches, do they have do they take down all references to Mecca and put up the cross with directions say to the Holy Land?
Do mosques do can you go to a mosque and see the cross with directions to Jerusalem or Bethlehem?
I don't think so.
The church targeted is the Seaman's Mission Church in Stockholm's Eastern Dockyards.
The bishop held a meeting there this year and challenged the priest to explain what he would do if a ship's crew came into port who were not Christian but wanted to pray.
Okay.
Fine.
As though they couldn't find a place.
Okay, let's move on to the Trump stuff.
We go to the audio sound bites.
And first up, Stuart Stevens.
This is last night on CNN with the uh the program is the lead with Jacob Tamper.
And he uh spoke with Stuart Stevens as a former Mitt Romney campaign strategist.
And of course, they're talking about the Trumpster and the Trumpster's presidential campaign.
And Tamper says to Romney's campaign strategist, and these people know about losing, so they might be the ones to ask.
You don't think you don't think Trump's gonna make it, eh, Stu?
I don't think he's gonna be on the ballot by February one.
I think he said it tonight that the greatest sin in his uh value system is to be a loser.
And most people who run for president lose.
I don't think you'll risk it.
So the theory there is that using Trump's own words.
The greatest sin in the Trump world is to be a loser.
Most people lose who run for president.
Trump will get out before he officially loses.
Stuart Stevens' point is Trump will get out before anybody can say he's a loser.
He will withdraw his candidacy.
There boy can nobody can ever say he lost or was defeated, he pulled himself out.
So now, since this has become the conventional wisdom, it's not just here with Stuart Stevens and CNN last night.
It's been all over the drive-by since the weekend, and maybe even toward the tail of last week, tail in the last week.
It's just one of these things that's taken over.
They they see it uh a poll or two go by that Trump doesn't gain any ground and maybe loses a half point or a point.
Uh-uh-uh.
They get all excited.
It's it's uh Trump is peaked.
It's on the downside now, and it becomes conventional wisdom.
That Trump's best days are behind him.
So now all they do is ask him about that.
CNN this morning, new day, Chris Cuomo, said, Look, depending on the poll, people are catching you, Donald, it's actually making people start speculate about you when you'll get out of the race.
Which I find very unusual.
Usually a front runner isn't discussed in terms of when they'll get out.
But I read somewhere where you said if you fell behind badly, you would get out.
Are you thinking about when you would get out of the race?
Not even one percent of a thought.
Look, it's a phony deal that was perpetrated on the public.
I was asked a simple question by Chuck Todd at Meet the Press, and I gave a very honorable and honest answer.
I said, sure, if I was doing terribly like some of these people, I wouldn't stay in.
I mean, who would stay in?
But I'm not.
I'm leading every single poll.
One poll came out the other day.
I'm at 35% nationally, 35%.
I'm 20 points ahead of everybody else.
Why would I get out?
I'm not going anywhere.
I'm leading every poll.
I'm gonna win, and I'm gonna make our country great again.
And they weren't through.
They can t the conversation continued.
We just busted it up so that we don't have a rule here.
No soundbite goes longer than a minute just because of audience attention spans.
Here's the continuation of the conversation.
You hear people saying that you should get out or you have to change.
I don't hear that, Chris.
I don't hear that.
He asked a question.
Well, you do hear it.
Romney's guy went on and said I think he's gonna get out before I was.
It's so disgusting.
I'll tell you what, the media is so dishonest, it's so disgusting.
Let me make it a little bit different.
I'm not getting out.
I'm gonna win, okay?
I gave a very honest answer, but the press takes an answer like that, and they make it like, oh, there's a big story to make headlines out of it.
It's ridiculous.
Well, you know, in a way you have to you have to think that's gonna happen.
When you tell these people that hate your guts and want you to lose and want you out of the race, and these people have a have an impact on polls, when you tell these people if you start lagging behind in the polls, you'll get out, what do you think they're gonna do?
When they want you out in the first place, they're gonna make that the narrative.
Trump losing ground.
Trump says he'll get out.
Will you get out now?
Are you and they change the whole frame of reference about the about the Trump campaign.
Don't forget, these people, you know, every one of these people has their own polling unit.
CNN's got their own polling unit, NBC has theirs and ABC has theirs, and NBC And the Wall Street Journal have theirs and the New York Times, CBS have theirs.
And I don't care how above board and honest they are, you can get any result you want in any poll simply by toying with the sample.
And look, even if you monkey with the sample and you are honest about how you've monkeyed with the sample, you can still produce a poll that shows Trump losing ground.
You can do nothing but Democrats or this or that, and you could show Trump losing ground.
And even if you say, yeah, we went out, we got it, we've got a skewed sample here, but the result is what matters.
That's what gets reported.
I'm sure Trump was talking about people like like Kasich and uh Pataki, uh uh people in it a half percent, you know, Lindsay Graham to see 1%, 2%, or whatever.
Um, but that's that's all it took.
They're salivating.
I can't wait, and they want to be the reason why, by the way.
All these media people, they are in a mad quest for the scalp.
They want to be able to say they are the reason Trump was forced out of a campaign.
We'll take a brief time out here, continue in moments, don't go away.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
This is the Rush Limbaugh program of the EIB network, where every day is America Day.
And don't doubt it.
Every day is America Day here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Gloria Borger next, CNN last night situation room, Wolf Blitzer said to Gloria Borger, Trump's lead in New Hampshire's narrowing out there, Gloria.
What do you think of that?
He's still leading, but the air is slowly sort of seeping out of the balloon a bit.
I mean, obviously, he is the front runner, but if you look at his polling in New Hampshire, for example, Wolf, he was beating his nearest competitor a month ago by 16 points.
That's a huge lead.
Now he's just ahead of Fiorina by five points.
You see the field shifting, not dramatically, but you can see that Trump is not in the stratosphere anymore.
Right.
And here's uh Megan Kelly on Fox News last night opening the show, reporting on a new poll.
Breaking tonight, three new polls showing big moves in the Republican field.
And for the first time in three months, one national poll showing a new man on top.
Welcome to the Kelly File, everyone.
I'm Megan Kelly.
Brand new polling out tonight from Investors Business Daily has Dr. Ben Carson in first place at 24% in a national survey.
Only the second time Carson has ever been on top, and the first time someone has bested Donald Trump since early July.
Well, see, they're all they're all reveling in this.
Now, Jim Garrity has a the National Review campaign spot blog has a post.
And I'll tell you who's really got bad poll numbers out there, but you're gonna have to dig really deep to find them.
You know who I'm talking about?
Hillary Clinton's polling that I mean, they're horrible.
Hillary Clinton's polling numbers are just almost in the dirt.
But you're not gonna find that.
You're gonna find, in fact, the exact opposite.
You're gonna find stories about Hillary is killing it now.
Hillary's finally coming back.
Hillary's much better as an underdog than is a front runner.
Hillary's got her game on.
Hillary's back.
Oh, they're still they're celebrating out there.
Meanwhile, her poll numbers, you need the Hubble telescope to find them.
In many places.
In Iowa, Jeb Bush, who barely shows up in Republican polls.
Oh, by the way, speaking of that, the Daily Beast, you know, the Daily, not the Daily Caller.
The Daily Beast, that left-wing site that was started by Tina Brown.
They've got a piece today saying, Jeb, get out.
It's time to get out, Jib.
You're wasting your donors' money.
You're not going to win.
You're embarrassing the Bush family and doing everything else.
Just get out now.
And you'll be doing so many people so many favors.
You'll spare the country even a Bush Clinton race, perhaps.
Um you'll spare your donors a bunch of money, and they're they're dead, they're dead serious about it.
Of course, they would be dead serious being a left-wing site.
But before we in Iowa, this what poll is this?
This is uh NBC News.
Republican Jeb Bush leads Hillary by 10 points in a hypothetical general election matchup among registered voters.
You can't find Jeb on the Republican side, but in a matchup against Hillary creams her.
It's 50 to 40%.
Donald Trump's ahead of her by seven points, 48 to 41.
And that's unchanged from the same poll a month ago.
Carly Fiorina leads Hillary in Iowa by 14 points, 52 to 38.
She beats Hillary better than Bush or Trump.
Yeah, that's a 14-point margin for Carly Fiorina, if we are to believe any of this.
Now, when you throw Bernie Sanders in, and you match him up against the same Republicans, his numbers are stronger than Hillary's.
Sanders beats Trump by five points in Iowa, 48 to 43.
Remember, Trump beats Hillary by seven.
He narrowly trails Bush 46 to 44.
Bush beats Hillary by 10.
And he barely is narrowly behind Carly Fiorina at 4542.
Carly is just killing Hillary by 14 points.
The same dynamic plays out in New Hampshire.
Clinton leads Trump in New Hampshire 4845.
But she's behind Bush and Fiorina.
Yet Sanders has the advantage against both Trump and Fiorina, and he's tied against Bush in the Sanders is doing much better than Hillary.
Hillary really, really bad shape polling wise.
And the margin of error for this point is three points.
Now Gardy says here with numbers that week it may be time for Republicans to do everything they can to help save her campaign.
Just an attempt at a joke.
Now, same poll, NBC Wall Street Journal.
This is Garrity writing.
Garrety's not a fan of Trump.
He says you'll see a lot of Trump foes citing the NBC poll and high-fiving concluding that Trump's moment has passed.
But don't overstate this.
NBC poll in Iowa has him sliding from 29 to 24%.
The NBC poll in New Hampshire has Trump sliding from 28 to 21%, but he's still leading in both states.
And then there's this investors' business daily poll has Ben Carson at 24%, Trump at 17.
But as Garrity writes here, be very wary or a little wary of the sample size.
377 registered voters who are Republican or registered independents who lean toward the Republican Party with a margin of error plus or minus five points.
That's a small sample.
And it's a big margin of error.
And it's the first investors' business daily poll of the cycle.
So Garedy is trying to warn everybody all excited about this.
Hey, hey, hey, it's this bunch's first poll.
Investors Business Daily First Poll is a very small sample, 377.
Registered Republicans or registered independents who lean Republican and a margin of error plus or minus five.
So anyway, they've got doesn't matter.
You got the polling data.
And that's all they need.
Doesn't matter who, doesn't matter where does they've got a poll that shows Trump sliding.
And various interested parties, such as the media and the Republican establishment, are going to run with it.
Okay, that's the first hour, busy broadcast here at EIB Network, a brief timeout here.
We'll come back and wrap it up.
And uh we've got we've got great call roster on hold here, waiting to get in on it, and then lots of other things to touch on, including Biden and this latest bit of news that the drive-bys are all excited about.
Biden himself leaked word of his son's dying wish to Maureen Dowd.
That's why we know of this story.
All right, so you hang in there, be tough.
We will be right back.
Just getting warmed up here, folks.
Two big exciting broadcast uh hours to go here on the Rush Limbaugh program, including news that Bill Clinton did nothing to retaliate against a people who bombed the Cobar Towers.
▲
Export Selection