All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:28
September 30, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
And greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plane.
I can't believe it's already Wednesday.
I mean, for some reason it seems like Tuesday to me, but here it is already Wednesday, the fastest week in media.
Great to have you here, folks.
Telephone number 800 28282 and the email address L Rushboard EIB net.com.
CNN is breathless this morning.
They just can't stop reporting that uh the last couple of hours that uh U.S. officials are saying that Russia is not hitting ISIS targets in the first air assaults in Syria.
And of course they're not.
You know who Russia is bombing?
Our allies.
They are trying to protect Assad uh in a sense.
Well, they're doing what Assad wants them to do, which is protecting him.
The moderate rebels want to topple Assad, and that's that's that's who uh the Russians are hitting.
Um so it it it's it in all of this is kind of funny because the uh uh Russians went ahead and went in there in defiance of Obama and and Obama and the administration is all upset.
So the uh the reason for breathless happiness on CNN is that Russia is seen to be as screwing up, which the regime, Obama and others would love.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, also uh we have learned, I didn't know this until today, that the Pope had a secret meeting with Kim Davis while he was in Washington.
Kim Davis was flown to Washington for a private meeting with the Pope.
She's the woman that refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples in that county in Kentucky.
And she was imprisoned for what put in jail for a while.
The Pope flew her in celebrated her, applauded her for her courage.
The media has found out about this, and they're not happy.
Just a couple of sound bites.
First off, uh, from Good Morning America Today, here is Kim Davis describing her meeting with Pope Francis.
It was really uh very humbling to even think that he would want to, you know, meet me or know me.
I put my hand out, and uh he rushed and he grabbed it and uh uh hugged him and he hugged me, and he said, Thank you for your courage before he left.
He said stay strong.
That was a great encouragement.
Just knowing that the Pope is on track, you know, with what we're doing and agreeing, you know, kind of validates everything.
Before he left, he said stay strong.
That was a great encouragement, just knowing the Pope is on track, you know, with what we're doing and agreeing, you know, kind of validates everything.
This we haven't yet seen full evidence of this, but this has turned the media upside down.
They're prepared to love this guy because of his economic policies and his uh uh apparent public stance that advances the Obama agenda.
But this, this, this is just sent him for a loop.
Just a it's a tiny example.
It's not a full-fledged example.
There probably will be more later.
But this is Paula Ferris, who is uh ABC correspondent on Good Morning America talking about this.
With enthusiastic crowds lining the streets from New York to DC, the Pope seemed to strike just the right note with Americans on his visit.
But now this morning reports of a secret meeting with Kim Davis, the county clerk in Kentucky, who defied a court order to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Did you hear the tone of that folks?
Did you hear the two that started out?
With exthusiastic crowds lining the streets of New York to DC, the Pope seemed to strike just the right note with Americans on his visit.
But now.
But now this morning, reports of a secret meeting with Kim Davis, the county clerk.
So all bets are off now.
This Pope throws everybody for a loop now and then.
And I just had to share that with you because I uh I thought it was funny.
The only thing about this that that I have a just the slightest question is why was the meeting secret?
And why is the Vatican refusing to confirm or don deny that it happened?
Why is the Pope so afraid of people finding out that he's a defender of religious beliefs?
Well, that may be too strong a statement for you, but why is it why is it why is it that the Pope wants to keep secret the fact that he encouraged a woman to follow religious beliefs that he himself holds.
Why the secrecy?
Okay, ladies and gentlemen, it's time now for an object lesson.
Now, normally I would ignore these sound bites that I have, but this is going to prove valuable.
Because what has happened here, my take on NASA's announcement of the discovery of water on we cannot move past this yet.
It has entered the bloodstream of the low information crowd in this country via late night comedy shows and PBS.
And this is going to irritate some of you because you're going to get mad because you love me and you love the program, and you hate it when what I say is lied about or distorted or misrepresented, and I do too.
And I love you for getting mad about that.
Don't misunderstand.
But I think on balance, this has the potential to be to be good because these people, uh, the hosts of these shows are exposing themselves as the ignoramuses they are.
Uh first, let's go to PBS, well, actually NPR, but it's all the same.
This was last night they had a guest on North Carolina businessman Jay Faison, and they were talking about his organization called Clear Path Foundation, which is devoted to convincing conservatives that climate change is real.
Oh.
May I make a brief departure.
I will not lose my place, I promise you.
I came across on one of my little tech blogs last night, something I thought this has to be from the onion.
This has to be Scott Ott.
This has to be satire, but no, it was real.
The headline to stop climate change, we must genetically engineer human beings.
And one of the things, and the people at this tech blog think this is brilliant and wonderful, and they wholly endorse it.
This is how deep the corruption of uh the leftist agenda reaches, or how how deep it sinks.
This this is evidence of just how beyond corrupt uh damaging this entire climate change argument happens to be because of what the end result of it's going to be.
The end result of it is always going to be people ending up supporting massively bigger and bigger government with massively more and more regulations that massively limit more and more freedom and liberty because it's predicated on the fact that human beings in our natural state are destructive.
Human beings as created are destroying the planet.
The human engineering, one of the things that this story talks about, the human engineering that will be required to save the planet in the future, is to genetically alter the human eye so that we can all have as the primary portion of our day nighttime.
And that we will need no light at nighttime because if we genetically alter our eyes, we'll be able to see at night without lights and save all kinds of electricity and therefore pollute less and therefore not destroy the planet via climate change.
And this theory is wholeheartedly supported, it's wholeheartedly endorsed.
I mean, this is the kind of abject lunacy that now passes for mainstream in this argument.
So, again, to set this up, NASA announces, coincidentally, uh timing perfect for a new movie called The Martian.
NASA, which wants money to go to Mars, announces that they've discovered flowing water.
And it wasn't just that they've discovered flowing water, and I never once said they made that up.
But that's what the late night comedians will say in just a second, as you will hear.
My objection, or my point of uh interest that I raised is that the NASA scientist involved in announcing this said that in addition to the flowing water, they discovered that two thirds of the northern hemisphere of Mars was once covered by ocean that was a mile deep.
And I simply raised what I think is an intelligent question.
How do you know?
We've not been there.
We have not had enough probes to go there to learn anything like this.
But it was more than that that made me dubious.
The announcement contained the following phrase.
When explaining why the water that was there isn't there anymore on Mars.
Why it was a catastrophic event, probably brought on by climate change.
How miraculous, how coincidental that we've now discovered catastrophic climate change on Mars that has destroyed an ocean.
Now, catastrophic climate change on Earth is going to destroy land.
Because catastrophic climate change here is going to cause ice caps to melt and the sea level is going to rise, and we're all going to die because we're all going to drown.
On Mars, the exact opposite happened, apparently.
A catastrophic climate change, probably brought on by climate change.
That's all supposition.
It's wild guess, it's bogus, and it's amazing to me how automatically it's believed.
This is, folks, I'm not going to stop fighting this stuff.
This is common sense perception.
And this is the kind of stuff that's going to have to be beaten back if we're going to ever stop this never-ending expansion of government and government regulation and government law and spending and debt and reduced liberty and freedom, all of it's relevant.
It's all the result of this stuff, because what governments essentially are saying is now we've got a genetically alter human beings to be able to see at night without lights.
Our natural state, as created by God, destroys our planet.
And do you not think it's a little dangerous that young skulls full of mush would kind of sign on to this and believe it?
So we have the absolute absence of science being presented as science.
It is unquestioned by anybody in the low information comedy world.
And when somebody like me comes along with valid penetrating questions rooted in common sense, that person has to be laughed at, mocked, made fun of, distracted, distorted, what have you, because the little cocoon in which these people have constructed for themselves to live, gets blown to smithereens and they can't handle anything contrary to this belief system they've all evolved.
So here is NPR.
Here is Jim Jay Faison, who runs a group called Clear Path Foundation devoted to convincing you, conservatives, that climate change is real.
The host is Robert Siegel.
Rush Limbaugh said yesterday, I hope half facetiously, that leftists will manage somehow to work the discovery of water on Mars into their agenda.
He said NASA has been corrupted by the current regime.
How do you understand the suspicion of science that plays well, at least with some conservative audiences?
Well, I think some people have made a good business on riling up the most conservative.
I think Rush Limbaugh's built a very successful business.
So that's his trade.
And I think he's running out of material, frankly.
Contraire, Mr. Faison, but this is not something I'm riling anybody up about.
See, the what you people don't understand is that conservatives are not my numb robots wandering aimlessly throughout the country until I came along.
All I do is validate what people already believe.
It's not as though you had 100% belief, public opinion on climate change, and I came along and blew it up and now it's 50-50.
You've never had it a hundred hundred, a hundred percent zero.
But even this is a misstatement.
The host here, Rush Limbaugh said yesterday, hope half facetiously, the leftists will manage somehow to work the discovery of water on Mars into their.
That's not what I said.
Didn't say they're gonna work the discovery of water into the agenda.
What I said was their attempted explanation for even after discovery, why it's not there anymore.
Catastrophic climate change causes an entire northern hemisphere of mile deep water to vanish.
That's what I was questioning.
Not the discovery of water.
We already know there's water on Mars because Mars has ice caps.
I was not disputing that.
And everybody, but this is how it happens, and this is why I'm taking the time to play the bites to at least correct the record as best I can here.
Misquoted, misinterpreted on purpose.
It's what you have to understand.
This is being done on purpose, because actually I'm getting too close to the truth.
I mean, in the old days, they used to be able to go out and make these pronouncements.
Yes, we just discovered flowing water on Mars.
Do you know it used to be two-thirds of it was covered by water a mile deep, but a catastrophic event, probably related to climate change came along and it's gone.
And everybody goes, whoa, wow.
And that's what they say is happening here.
Oh my God, we're all gonna and nobody would challenge it.
And it became accepted belief, and that they make movies about it.
I come along and say, wait a minute.
This isn't science, this is wild guess, and this is politics.
Every bit of this explanation of what happened to the water on Mars is politics.
And I'm sorry, folks, it's my quest.
It has been for 27 years to get people to understand who liberals are and how they operate.
Conan O'Brien is next, and here's how he treated it.
Not everybody's happy, though, about this.
Rush Limbaugh has said, this is real, that the evidence of water on Mars is all part of a leftist agenda.
So Rush Limbaugh said.
Limba also said that a hydrogen atom bringing two oxygen atoms together to make water is pretty gay.
All right, now everybody knows the last thing is not true.
But see, this this is how it is.
Now normally I would ignore these things.
What are you frowning at in there, Mr. Snur?
Are you s oh you didn't know Kona still had a show?
Well, most people don't.
Uh but Snurley, they're mad in there on the other side of the glass.
They're livid because of how what I say gets distorted.
That's another reason why I'm playing these things.
I again, so somewhere in the media, probably Media Matters, is this little passage that I have somehow related the announcement of the discovery of water on Mars as a leftist agenda item, which is not at all, it's not even close to what I said.
Anyway, and next, Comedy Central, the nightly show Larry Wilmore.
Speaking of primitive animals seeking attention, Rush Limbaugh.
He has taken something as exciting and fun as finding water on Mars and turned it into something dirty.
They're just making up the amount of ice in the North and South Poles, they're making up the temperatures, they're lying and making up false charts and so forth.
So what's to stop them from making up something that happened on Mars that will help advance their left-wing agenda on this planet.
What?
You think NASA made this up?
They called a press conference and made this up to further leftist agenda?
You know what?
To stop it.
That's exactly.
Larry, that's exactly what they did.
I don't know who he is.
He's just got a show of comedy.
But that Larry, that's exactly what they did.
But it wasn't about the discovery of Mars, Larry.
It was the announcement that the water is now gone, probably because a catastrophic event.
Maybe, probably caused by climate change.
Larry, get a brain, will you, if you're going to host that show on a here it is from Media Matters for America.
This was posted back on September 28th.
After NASA announces it found water on Mars, Rush Limbaugh says it's part of a climate change conspiracy.
And that's where NPR and Conan and Wilmore got their material to write the jokes.
They didn't check my website.
They didn't call to find out if Media Matters got me correct at all.
And so they but you see the reason they're happy to do it, the reason they're happy to misquote me, folks, is what they're really trying to do is continue the lie that conservatives are anti-science.
That is one of the agenda items, in fact, that the left is constantly pushing.
And the reality of that is that we are actually opposing phony science.
What we are saying, I'll tell what I'm saying is that there isn't any science in global warming.
It's computer models and a so-called consensus of scientists.
There is no consensus in science.
Science isn't up for a vote.
It's all been corrupted for the advancement of the liberal agenda.
Climate change, uh big government requiring and demanding changes in human behavior, control over human behavior, it's all part of the same thing.
But there's no science in it.
What we're saying here, what I'm saying is can we have a little science in this debate?
Because there isn't any.
But they are trying to spread this uh lie that conservatives, of course, are uh Cro-Magnon or Neanderthal and that we're anti science and backwards and so forth.
And by the way, that, if you don't know, is rooted in their bias and bigotry against Christianity.
They happen to believe that uh Christians uh don't believe in science because science conflicts with the Bible and God, and they don't think the two can go together.
I mean, the bigotry and the bias that these people exhibit, and in many cases they may not even be aware of it.
They're just so of the conditions of their lives and their people they've been uh influenced by their liberalism may not even be something they're cognizant of having or being, but it manifests itself in uh in every which way they describe uh current events.
But I just wanted to play those bites for you to show you how this is done, how it's distorted, uh, and how misinformation, lies, and so forth end up in the bloodstream of the low information voter segment of the population.
We've got much more.
We're coming back with it right after this, so don't go away.
Greetings and welcome back, L Rushmore, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Telebote numbers 800 28282, and the email address, L Rushmore at EIBNet.com.
While I have this at the top of the stack, let me just give you the details of this.
Again, I've I'm I'm in my downtime yesterday.
And I going into my hobby.
Oh, by the way, people saying, Rush, we've noticed that you haven't yet spoken about the new iPhone.
That's right, I haven't spoken about the new iPhone.
You know why?
Because I realize that many of you are in the stick to the issues crowd.
And if I started talking about it, you'd get mad and start peppering me with emails with single the issues.
But I will talk about the new iPhone in due course.
And I even have some here that well, I'll be talking about the new iPhone in due course.
All I can tell you is there isn't a smartphone in the world that can even keep up with it.
It is the I'm gonna remind people about the new book.
That's another thing I was not going to lead with because I don't want to make the program about me, except when these neophytes on TV are misquoting me and getting me wrong.
Yeah, we're the number one book on Amazon, Rush Revere and the Star Spangled Banner.
I I f I I don't know.
I I don't know how to tell you people how much gratitude we have for you.
I just don't know anymore.
Twenty-seven years and I still get goosebumps.
When I when I see the evidence of uh of all of you out there, I don't know.
I have such such a profound sense of gratitude and appreciation.
Number one, children's book, targeted 10 to 13, it's number one on Amazon, after one mention yesterday.
And I uh so we we are we are all, everybody on the Rush Revere team uh is just we're just blown away by it.
So yeah, I was gonna talk about it later.
Snerdly uh bashed me here and forced me into talking about it now.
You didn't know it was number one, you just you just you just wanted me to mention it again.
Okay, well, I have more on that coming up as well, and and the iPhone.
But I'm folks, I'm telling you, there's nothing that can keep up with it.
That this new iPhone had a friend of mine last week asked me if he thought he should get one because he was hearing it wasn't all that special.
And I wrote him back, I said, I don't know who you're talking to.
Probably somebody who thinks it isn't any different because it looks the same as the previous iPhone, but there's not the the the amount of upgrades in this phone, technological upgrades, is mind boggling.
There has not been an upgrade anywhere near this in any iPhone previous to it.
The only computers faster than the new iPhone are Apple laptops and desktops.
And this phone's even faster than a couple of Apple laptop computers.
It's it's amazing, plus some of the new features that have been added.
But all of that in a minute.
I want to stay focused on this thing I found yesterday that I previously mentioned about needing to reengineer human genetics in order to save the planet.
It was on a tech blog.
And these are millennials, and they are all in on this.
They have bought every lie.
They have bought every phony non-science disguised as science assumption about this.
And it's getting precarious now because they're genuinely frightened.
This is what's happening to them.
It's what's happening to these millennials and others.
All of this, this never-ending crisis after crisis after crisis news story, day after day after day, is literally scaring some of these people.
And I've got a, by the way, there's a story about that about how college age students today end up calling 911 when they see a mouse in the dorm.
I mean, literally petrified over seeing a mouse.
They have been so sheltered and protected by their parents, they haven't the slightest idea how to live on their own.
They live in perpetual fear of everything they hear in the news that's going to kill them or destroy them or destroy the planet.
They believe this stuff.
And how anybody could believe this is beyond me, but that's what I want to share with you.
This is uh uh the website I found it on is Gizmodo, which is part of the Gawker network of websites, and you really have to, if you're gonna go there, Gawker, I I wouldn't recommend it.
You really gonna need an open mind, and you're gonna have to have the ability not to hold me responsible.
But the headline of the piece here to stop climate change, we must genetically engineer humans.
A lot of researchers are thinking about how to genetically engineer crops and food animals to help them withstand close post-climate change heat and parched conditions.
Now, meanwhile, it hasn't gotten any warmer in almost 19 years.
And in fact, the real science that's out there now is getting very cautiously concerned about a coming glacial age.
And yet these kids are all in on their belief that global warming is happening, it's irreversible, and now we need to start planning for our lives 30 years down the road for after we've all been affected by it.
Meanwhile, have you seen as a hurricane out there that just magically formed its near the Bahamas?
Have you seen a picture of the computer models and the track they are forecasting?
There must be 30 computer models, and that's by the way, the only thing we have to tell us about global warming.
Don't doubt me.
There is no science.
There's no data, it's just predictions in computer models.
You take a look at all of those models of the track of this hurricane, Hurricane Joaquin, by the way, is the name of it.
Everybody's wondering where will Joaquin enter the country.
We're talking about predicting the track of a hurricane tomorrow and the next day.
And if you look at all of these models, you will clearly see that nobody is confident of where it's gonna go.
Nobody has the slightest idea.
Even the Hurricane Center's official forecast cone is so wide now as to be a joke.
And yet, they tell us in 20 years, in 30 years, in 50 years, a hundred years, the Earth is going to be whatever it is.
And here you have people believing it Without question, without question, young people believing it and getting scared and signing up for this, signing on to it, and therefore agreeing to the most ridiculous things that Democrats and leftists around the world propose in order to solve the problem.
And there's nothing we can do even if it is happening.
We didn't cause it, we can't stop it.
All of it's so absurd, folks.
It's it's almost beyond my ability to express how ridiculous this all is.
But you know, when you keep young people scared, when you frighten them and tell them that their future is bleak, and that there's nothing on their own they can do about it because powerful forces beyond our control are dictating these things.
What are they going to do?
They're going to invest their hope and their trust and their faith in all of these distant figures in distant capitals who claim to have the answer to save their lives.
So listen again to how this story starts.
A lot of researchers are thinking about how to genetically engineer crops and food animals to help them withstand post-climate change heat and parched conditions.
Post-climate change.
Well, we're thinking about now what?
20 years, 30 years?
They won't tell us what climate change is going to do tomorrow or next year, or even two years from now.
No, no, no, no, they won't do that.
Because they can't.
They don't know what climate change is going to cause in the next day.
But somehow they're confident of the next 30 years, 50.
And of course they do that because nobody's going to be alive to check whether they were right or wrong.
But what about, back to the story?
What about genetically engineering humans to slow our constant carbon contributions, such as slowing down our breathing, because when we exhale, guess what comes out?
Pollution, CO2.
In 2012, a philosopher named Matthew Lau co-authored a paper that proposed altering human biology to combat climate change.
In the paper, Lao and his colleagues propose a number of possible changes to human biology to help combat climate change.
And when the paper came out, it got a lot of attention.
Some people thought that Lao and his colleagues were trolling the academic community or that it was some sort of early April fool's joke.
Bill McKibben, a prominent environmental advocate, tweeted that the suggestions in the paper were the worst climate change solutions of all time.
And of course, climate skeptics thought it was totally insane.
But now people are looking at it differently.
Why?
What's changed?
Nothing's changed.
It isn't any warmer than it was, except they think it is.
They've been told that what was it this year or last year?
Was the hottest year ever on record?
You know what that's like?
That's like saying that there used to be two-thirds of Mars covered by water, but it's now gone.
Probably due to a catastrophic event, probably caused by climate change.
We don't have the slightest idea if last year or this year is the hottest ever.
No idea.
We've only keep been keeping records a hundred years.
We have no clue.
We don't even really know how old the Earth is, to where everybody agrees with it, so it's it's absurd.
But it is young people buy it.
So here's the upshot of this.
It's all about the ideas some scientists, and I put that in quotes, are exploring the modify human genes to take the burden off of the planet, because you see, human beings in our natural state are destructive.
Human beings in our natural just go about our lives daily business aren't destructive.
We are destroying the planet just by virtue of our existence.
And these changes come from this paper written in 2012.
It's getting a second look after many people think it was a joke at first.
Remember, we're dealing with questionably sane people here.
That's why I take this stuff seriously.
I listen to these features like I listen to the Iranians when they tell us what they're gonna do.
I listen to our enemies when they tell us they're gonna wipe.
I listen to these people when they tell us what they believe.
And here are the three things.
They want to make us they want to genetically alter humanity so that we can see at night, so that we won't need electricity, so that we won't need lights, so that we will not destroy the planet.
They want to make us allergic to meat.
They want to biologically alter, genetically alter human beings so that everybody is allergic to beef, so that less is eaten, which means there will be fewer cow farts, which means there will be less methane, which means less climate change.
And they want to make us smaller.
They want to genetically engineer human beings so that we are smaller people, so that our human footprint and everything about our lives is smaller.
The amount of energy we use, the amount of pollutants we exhale, and they want to be able to fit us all in littler and littler places like smaller and smaller public housing and so forth.
These are the things that are now being given a serious look.
And these young millennials who think they're on the cutting edge tech-wise think, hey, you know what?
They're they're they're all in.
Well worth looking into.
Because thirty years from now we gotta we gotta alter cattle and other food animals to be able to withstand the post-climate change heat, which means it must be going to be so bad that nobody's gonna be able to survive it unless we genetically alter ourselves.
These people all vote Democrat, folks.
This is why this matters to me.
Virtually all of these people vote Democrat.
And that is what is at the root of practically every problem culturally, politically, and economically, our country faces right now.
Okay, coming up on the EIB network, the latest of the presidential campaigns, big news in the Trump campaign, big news in the Hillary campaign, the Teamsters have snubbed Hillary and are saying that they're taking a look at Trump.
So Hillary's making some drastic moves to try to head that one off.
Uh also some evidence, by the way, my long-a-go first explained reason why Hillary Clinton has an entitlement attitude about the presidency, why she is owed it, she has admitted it.
In her own words, takes about 30 seconds, the soundbite coming up as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears today.
And the uh the news in Syria and Russia and what's happening there and the United States being humiliated by Putin's actions.
It's caused John McCain to head to the floor of the Senate.
He's expressed some outrage and shock here over what and basically what's happening is that we're we're having our hat handed to it, handed to us by Putin.
So there's that and much more here, such as proof helicopter parenting has created a generation of traumatized, rick-averse, risk-averse wusses.
And it has.
And these are the same kind of people that fall for all of these phony science claims, phony health claims, rooted in a daily existence of crisis, and by the way, they've grown up watching nothing but dystopian movies about the end of the world.
All of it's had a cumulative effect on uh on all these young people.
Anyway, to the phones, I want to grab a call or two before this hour expires.
Phalan, California, hi Bill, great to have you.
Welcome.
Good uh good morning, Rush.
Really, thank you very much for having me on.
I'm a long, long time listener, almost from the very beginning, and uh I think it was meant for me to get through today on this particular subject alone.
Fire away, man.
Thank you.
Okay.
On the Mars thing, uh, I'm a uh special effects artist and an actor in Hollywood, but I'm a conservative, kind of like Gary Sinise, Ronald Reagan, Charlton Aston, and I counted Charlton Heston as a very, very good acquaintance before he passed away.
And uh when we do science fiction, we have to do real life research, Rush, and uh what the uh uh liberals today are are smearing over is the fact that there was science on what possibly happened to Mars many years ago.
But what they're doing is they're just like the global warming and the global cooling, they're changing the scenario now to fit their political agenda.
What we believe happened to Mars was that an asteroid struck very much like the dinosaurs being wiped out here on Earth sixty five million years ago, what extinted the dinosaurs.
Now there's two differences rush.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Who is this we, what we believe happened?
Who is that we're I'm talking about mainstream science, real science that counts, that has the real facts and figures.
Asteroids are convenient excuse for things, but because who can say it didn't work in the case.
Well no no rush really on Mars, the Northern Hemisphere is completely different than the Southern Hemisphere and it shows uh signs of trauma.
If you've ever seen the movie with Gary Sinise, Mission to Mars from a few years ago, uh at the end of the movie the alien or the Martian shows them what happened to Mars and why Mars was abandoned.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, I'm sorry I've I'm out of time here, but but uh you said that these movies this is gonna sound disrespectful.
Uh I I've got to think I'll hold back and think about this.
Be back here in just a second.
Fast as three hours in media, the first hour in the can on the way over to the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum, virtual museum at Rushlimbaug.com.
▲
Export Selection