All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
September 15, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yeah, very quietly.
Ben Carson sneaking up on everybody.
Very quietly.
Ben Carson is, I forget which poll exactly, but he's within the margin error tied with Trump.
Just sneaking up on everybody out there.
Hi, folks.
Great to have you with us.
Great to be back at you.
Telephone number here on the Rush Lib Baw program is 800-282-2882 and the email address LRushbo at EIBnet.com.
This is just too rich.
Did you see where Hillary Clinton has tweeted, this went out yesterday, to every survivor of sexual assault, you have the right to be heard.
You have the right to be believed.
We're with you.
Are you kidding me?
Hillary Clinton tweeting to every survival of sexual assault, they have the right to be believed.
They have the right to be heard.
You remember when she and James Carville and the rest of the bimbo eruption team in the Clinton White House, even the Clinton campaign, you remember what they did to women who rose up, came forward and said that Bill Clinton had either assaulted them or that they had affairs with him.
The case of Paula Jones, Carville's out there running around saying, What is what you get when you drag a dollar bill through a trailer court?
I mean, basically accusing these women of being bimbos and trailer trash.
I think the phrase was drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park.
Comes to mind, no matter what hey, get out there, you're going to find all kinds of trailer trash.
They're going to take a $1 bill.
See, Paula Jones, right over there.
And today we've got Mrs. Clinton.
This is what is called hubris.
And I understand the technique.
I know exactly what she's doing.
She also tweeted, rape is a crime wherever it happens.
I wonder if Juanita Broderick has seen that comment from Hillary today.
Juanita Broderick is one of those stories the millennials don't know about the Clintons.
And probably they'll never be told by the drive-by media about Juanita Broderick.
But if you are a millennial, a Miss America pageant contestant, for example, in the audience, and you don't know who Juanita Broderick is, she accused Bill Clinton of rape way back when in the late 80s, early 90s, mid-90s, somewhat, I forgot the exact year.
And NBC actually interviewed her and did a story of it.
And what she said was that after the rape, when Clinton's on his way out of the trailer, wherever it happened, I don't know.
He said he looked at her and said, hey, you know, babe, you better put some ice on that lip.
You got a little bleeding going on there.
Hey, see you later.
And he's out the door.
So here comes Hillary Clinton now.
And the reason this is happening, because she's losing white women in droves, is exactly what we told you yesterday.
Here's Andrea Mitchell on the Today Show today, just a portion of her report on Hillary bleeding white women.
Hillary Clinton is reaching out to that group that she'd always counted on, white women voters, who are now abandoning her in droves during the last two months.
Now, remember, this is in the ABC News Washington Post poll that ABC buried.
They did not report these numbers.
That's why NBC and CBS are.
And no, but that's right.
Sluts and nuts is what Hillary and company called those who were sexually assaulted by Bill.
That's what came out of the war room.
That was the nomenclature used to describe the bimbos.
How about the term bimbo eruption?
They came up with that.
I mean, that was, and there was a woman named Betsy Wright in the Clinton White House and the campaign who actually ran the bimbo eruptions unit, but it was Hillary who had the idea, and it was Hillary who offered the political advice on how to deal with these women.
The idea that she didn't know about it, any of it, and that she was righteously indignant or offended, has always been a joke.
Now, Hillary's banking on the fact that the drive-bys are not going to recount this history, and therefore the millennials aren't going to know about it.
She's going to just realize that the only people probably talking about it will be the people that did way back when, and that was us in talk radio.
So apparently, what she's bleeding white women, the numbers, she's lost 20% Of the white female vote, 60 to 40 percent just in the past two months.
Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders is just steamrolling along out there, and he's attracting all the buzz.
He's got all the energy and all the momentum.
And Mrs. Clinton is sitting there just like a lug.
And they're trying to do anything to inject some energy into this dormant campaign, which is actually predicated on a coronation and an automatic, a fait accompli, rather than something she should actually have to earn.
Because in the Clinton world, she already has earned it.
She's earned it countless times, sacrificing her own life and future in marrying Bill and going to Arkansas and having to put up with all of that.
I mean, having to live in Arkansas is bad enough, but then when your husband's running around with all the bimbos, and then he's only making 25 grand as governor, you have to go to the Rose law firm and you have to make strange cattle deals with Robert Red Bone.
You have to find ways to turn 10 grand into 100 grand by reading a Wall Street Journal, and you have to pull down 100-some-odd grand in salary from the Rose law firm.
Then you hide documents to the Rose law firm that don't show up in the White House map room for years.
I mean, she put in a lot of heavy duty here.
So, in her mind, in her campaign's mind, she's already earned it.
She doesn't have to campaign.
And that's what caught her up short in 2008.
I think the proof of this, she's not a good campaigner, and it's because she really doesn't, her heart's not in it.
I think, honestly, folks, she's one of these elitists that thinks that that's kind of beneath her.
She has to do it.
There's no way around it, but she does it as little as possible.
She's on the campaign trail as little as possible.
One of the reasons for that is the more she opens her mouth, the greater the likelihood her approval numbers are going to fall.
And that's just borne out by history.
But it is, more than anything else, that it's just, it's a process beneath her.
She shouldn't have to engage in this kind of insulting, have to bear it all kind of campaign process because she's been there, done that.
I mean, what more does she have to do?
She was in the White House as a co-president for eight years for crying out loud.
In her mind, in her world, she doesn't have to prove anything to anybody.
She doesn't have to introduce herself to anybody.
Everybody should know who she is, and there should be no questions.
She's also been the recipient of fawning media.
I don't care what the campaign's talking about, how unfair the New York Times has been to her.
It's a crock, too.
She and her husband have been the recipients of fawning, almost groupie-like media for 25 or more years.
And when there is a little tough media coverage, I mean, not even 10% of what the average Republican has to deal with every day, she doesn't know how to deal with it.
And her supporters don't know how to deal with it.
The people that run her campaign don't know how to deal with it.
So, anyway, the elephant in the room is Bill Clinton.
You can imagine Hillary and Huma Weiner sitting around contemplating the future.
And they're probably honest with themselves.
And they're saying the elephant in the room is her husband, Bill Clinton.
He has a past that cannot be forgotten and won't be.
He has a past that cannot be swept away.
So, how to deal with it?
How to deal with it is to just act like it never happened, like all of it was a bunch of lies put forth by the vast right-wing conspiracy.
Exactly what she did with Matt Wauer on the Today Show.
After the Lewinsky blue dress was found, the famous semen stain, the fact that Clinton had then been exposed as a liar, there she is on the Today Show saying, uh-uh-uh-uh, there's a vast right-wing conspiracy out to get my husband.
And then it was part of the way that Tarnish tried to tarnish Ken Starr.
And of course, Matt Wauer and the Today Show people didn't act incredulous at all.
Oh, really?
Is that what it is?
Okay, cool.
And then they followed the lead that Hillary gave them and started trying to find every example of extremism from some mysterious vast right-wing conspiracy that was responsible for Monica Lewinsky being in the White House.
And then responsible for Monica Lewinsky delivering a pizza to the Oval Office.
And somehow the vast right-wing conspiracy was responsible for everybody in the room at the time being shooed out of there so that the only two people remaining were Bill, Lewinsky, the pizza, and a cigar.
Vast right-wing conspiracy did all that.
So this is just a rehash.
The way to deal with the elephant in the room is to act like it isn't there.
To act like there is no hypocrisy or irony here at all.
Hillary is having trouble with women in the left-wing version of the female world.
Remember, they're all raped.
They're all accosted.
They're all put upon by predatory men.
Left-wing politics is that women are nothing but innocent victims constantly being oppressed, assaulted sexually and otherwise.
So Hillary's coming up and trying to recognize and have these other women recognize that she knows the trials and tribulations of their lives.
And the fact that in her past, she led a movement to destroy the very same kind of women she is now attempting to secure support from.
In the case of Kathleen Willey, in the case of Monica Lewinsky, in the case of Juanita Broderick, in the case of Paula Jones, and there's a long list of them.
Every one of those women, the Clinton campaign tried to destroy personally, insulting their reputations, calling them liars, trailer part trash.
So when you have that in your past and on your record, I'm sure in the Clinton world, you come out and you propose policies that simply ignore all of that, as though it didn't happen.
It's not there.
It isn't real.
It's made up by the vast right-wing conspiracy.
It's all lies.
And I, Hillary Clinton, actually do support women, and I understand their plight as American females to be constantly assaulted, constantly stigmatized, be stared at up and down by would-be muggers and so forth.
It's just, it's a hellish existence to be.
Guys might give you the wolf whistle as you walk by.
I mean, any number of horrible, rotten things.
One of them might even want to kiss you here and there at a bar.
That could just be so demeaning.
And Hillary wants to build a bond of understanding relatability.
Forget the emails.
Forget everything else.
Here is one statement that should be enough.
In the real world, this should undo the campaign.
This is Monday, that would be yesterday, in Cedar Falls, Iowa.
She said, this about women who make claims about sexual assault.
I think that when someone makes the claim, they come forward, they should be believed, and that is what starts the process.
And then there is a determination as to what, if anything, should be done about the claim that was made.
Now, what I got to show you, you take his dollar bill, and you drag his dollar bill, you drag their trainer park out there.
You never know what you're going to come in, but I can give you a goddamn idea right there.
Paula Jones, see that picture right there?
You drag a train of park out there, and that's exactly what you're going to get.
Paula Jones, you're going to be Kathy Willie, a dollar through a train of park.
Mrs. Clinton says, I think that when someone makes the claim, they come forward, they should be believed, and that is what starts the process.
This is the woman.
Again, for you, millennial babes, unaware, don't doubt me.
Hillary Clinton led the effort to destroy such women when her husband was campaigning for the presidency and was in the White House.
And it continues to this day.
I mean, look, the guy's not actually keeping it in his pants, and he hasn't since they left the White House.
And it's the same procedure today.
It's brazen.
I know it's brazen, but this is what the Clintons do.
They attack this head-on by saying just not there.
It doesn't exist.
All this stuff is made up.
Now she's got an ad.
They have an ad, and it's on her website and a YouTube channel entitled Hillary's Message to Survivors of Sexual Assault.
I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault.
Don't let anyone silence your voice.
You have a right to be heard, and you have a right to be believed.
We're with you.
Now, what's going on here, folks?
I mean, this is so brazen.
This is so.
This is, I don't know, but it seems to me we could be looking at a Clinton trap here, such as in they might just be trying to sucker someone into attacking her on Clinton's womanizing herself, because this is just brazen.
It's beyond brazen.
A message to every survival of sexual assault.
Don't let anyone silence your voice.
Anybody heard Monica Lewiski?
I mean, her life's pretty much destroyed by Bill Clinton.
And all the other Kathleen Willie, I mean, the list is fairly long.
Here is Juanita Broderick, by the way.
This is Dateline NBC from February 24th, 1999.
Lisa Myers, interviewing Juanita Broderick as a former nursing home administrator, about her allegation that President Bill Clinton had raped her years earlier.
Lisa Myers asks, had you that morning or any other time given Bill Clinton any reason to believe you might be receptive?
After Broderick says no, none whatsoever, Lisa Myers follows up and asks, well, then what happened?
And he tries to kiss me again.
And the second time he tries to kiss me, he starts biting on my lip.
Just a minute.
He starts to bite on my top lip.
And I try to pull away from him.
And then he forces me down on the bed.
And this was very frightened.
And I tried to get away from him and I told him no.
I didn't want this to happen.
But he wouldn't listen.
She went on to assert that as he left his way to the door, he turned and looked at her and said, Hey, you know, you might want to put some ice on that lip.
All right.
Take care.
See you later.
She's just one of many that this is what's out there.
It hasn't been fully refuted.
It's sort of been mostly ignored.
Anyway, it's out there.
While Hillary is claiming to stand up for exactly this kind of woman, but if you've been affected, impacted, treated, assaulted by Bill Clinton and you come forward, the Clinton team will destroy you.
They do not want you to be believed.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
Ha!
Are you?
Now, just a little food for thought here.
As I know, I know, look at this is a very partisan issue.
And I know a lot of you in the audience happen to be Democrats and happen to be liberals.
And you don't want to believe any of this simply because I'm the one saying it.
But you need to understand I'm not saying anything.
I'm just repeating and reporting what's already out there.
I mean, I've got Hillary Sega Clinton.
I did not have sexual relations to that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
I've got him lying.
We know what happened here.
Here's the thing for you people on the left and you millennials.
There is a man currently in this country who is in the process of being destroyed.
Can any of you think of the name I might be alluding to here?
Try Bill Cosby.
Women are coming out of every nook and cranny in this country and claiming that he drugged them and claiming that he raped them 10 years ago, 15 years ago, 20 years ago.
And last I looked, everybody was believing those women.
And Bill Cosby is pretty much considered a dirtbag now.
So it seems to me that if you're going to, because of the importance of the issue and the seriousness of the charge, if you're going to accept it because the women are saying so about Bill Cosby, then how can you just casually disregard what the women are accusing Clinton of it are saying simply because it's Clinton?
How does this inconsistency work?
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rushland Ball the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
We're here at 800-282-2882.
By the way, don't forget this, folks.
There was a tape that surfaced recently that featured Hillary Clinton laughing about getting a good deal for a guy who was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl.
A guy was 40 years old or some such thing.
And Hillary got the guy a good deal for raping a 12-year-old.
She was laughing about it.
My memory on this is somewhat vague, but I remember that.
Yeah, I think when Hillary Clinton served as the court-appointed attorney for a 40-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, it was in 1975.
She targeted the accuser's credibility in court records, i.e., the woman, the 12-year-old.
Hillary went after the little girl.
Now, you might be saying, well, that's what defense lawyers do, Mr. Limbaugh, and everybody's entitled to a defense in our country.
It's right there in the 19th Amendment and the 14th.
And it's right there.
I know it's in there, Mr. Limbaugh.
It's in the Constitution somewhere.
Even the biggest scumbags in the world are entitled to a defense, even if they're rapists and Mrs. Clinton.
Yeah, I know, but look, it's just like, I know.
Hypocrisy has never nailed a Democrat, and I don't think it ever will.
But we're dealing with more than hypocrisy here.
We're dealing with genuine irony.
I mean, Mrs. Clinton preaches a bunch of stuff that she doesn't actually believe.
This is classic the way the elites do.
They set up two sets of rules for everybody.
Well, two sets of rules.
One set for us and the other set for them, which exempts them from the rules they put up for us.
I mean, she's a phony on this stuff.
I mean, her husband is serial skirt chaser.
So I know the theory, the strategy, just ignore it, just to pretend it's not there.
Don't acknowledge it and don't even use it.
See, yes, I know I have these things in my past, and that's exactly why I'm even more committed to these issues now.
Don't even go there.
Just act like none of this ever happened.
It's all a bunch of vast right-wing conspiracy BS allegations and no truth to any of it.
That's the Clinton technique.
The 12-year-old girl, by the way, was emotionally unstable and had the tendency to seek out older men, Clinton wrote in a court affidavit.
I mean, this 12-year-old girl was literally destroyed.
That's right, Mr. Limbaugh, but of course, we millennials are learning this.
It's what happens in court.
Everybody needs a good defense.
Even the guiltiest of the guilty get it.
Yeah, right.
Understand that.
But you realize who did that.
Remember Claire McCaskill?
This is from thehill.com.
What is the date?
It is January 12th of 2014.
Excuse me.
Senator McCaskill did not want to be in the same elevator with Hillary Clinton.
The ill feeling between Hillary Clinton and Senator Claire McCaskill, a Democrat of Missouri, was at one point so intense that McCaskill told a friend she was scared of getting stuck alone with Hillary in an elevator.
It's in a book, forthcoming book, HRC, State Secrets, a Rebirth of Hillary Clinton, by a couple of writers, one from The Hill and one from The Politico.
She's quoted as saying, I really don't want to be in an elevator alone with her.
The tension between Clinton and McCaskill first formed after McCaskill made remarks on Meet the Press that struck raw nerves for both Hillary and Bill Clinton.
It all goes back to 2006.
McCaskill was debating the then senator from Missouri, Jim Talent.
They were in the midst of a campaign that McCaskill ultimately won.
The Clintons had given her strong backing.
But when the subject of Bill Clinton came up, McCaskill said he's been a great leader, but I don't want my daughter near him.
And that's what caused the deterioration of that relationship.
But again, look, I just want to see Cosby out there and all these women coming forth, and everybody believes every word they're saying.
I don't know anybody who doesn't believe it.
Well, I'm sure there are some.
I just don't know anybody.
Seems to me, and there are more women coming.
They're doing television shows about it now.
And it is clear that these women are automatically believed.
All it took was one that had the goods, and then all the others that follow are not even challenged.
Whatever stories they tell, everybody's buying.
Why not the same kind of treatment with Bill Clinton?
Look, I understand.
I know the answers to these questions.
Well, Bill Clinton's a popular Democrat, and he ran roses and rings around conservatives and beat Republicans so he can do anything he wants.
He's such a big, stud, big hero.
He beats Republicans.
It's all we care about.
He can do anything to anybody he wants.
We don't care.
So it is a double standard.
You get that from the left.
They'll circle the wagons around their victims.
Look at, there's a new movie out.
This is unrelated to Bill Clinton, but just to show you, two movies.
There's a new movie out that's just gotten grave reviews here, starring Robert Redford as Dan Blather and Kate Blanchett as Mary Mapes.
And it is a book.
Well, it's a movie made to tell the story about what happened to Rather and that National Guard story involving George W. Bush.
What's the purpose of that?
This is the left circling the wagons.
There's a bunch of young people now coming of voting age who don't know anything about it.
And so they circle the wagons, get a movie out there to try to cast doubt on what really happened.
HBO is preparing a movie on Clarence Thomas right now.
For what?
Sexual harassment of who?
Anita Hill.
Totally exonerated.
Nothing to it.
Happened, came in late during his confirmation hearing, Supreme Court.
It was Paul Simon's wife, the late Paul Simon, his late wife, Senator Millinoi, got this whole thing going.
Anita Hill was approached.
Hey, we've got to stop this guy.
You've worked with him.
How about we get some sexual harassment thing going?
Okay, fine.
They create this whole robust story to try to derail Clarence Thomas' nomination.
They've got no evidence.
That's where the phrase, the seriousness of the charge, first became known to me as a serious political weapon used by the left.
That was the second time.
And the way it goes is: well, the seriousness of the charge sort of means the nature of the evidence is not that important.
The nature of the evidence is the seriousness of the charge means we've got to look into this.
But there's no evidence for it.
It doesn't matter.
The seriousness of the charge dictates that we look into it.
So here's Clarence Thomas, nominated in 1990 by George H.W. Bush.
Try to destroy the guy on the basis of pubic hairs on Coke cans, and they had guys running around looking at whatever he had rented at video stores.
And this Anita Hill's got all these people testifying on her behalf.
What a wonderful person she is.
HBO is making a movie out of it now.
You know why?
Because a whole generation of people don't know anything about it.
Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court, liberals got to make sure that every generation gets the truth, quote unquote, of the formative issues of the time.
And so the HBO people are dutifully casting this movie.
It's, you know, an actor I like too, Wendell Pierce.
I really, really like Wendell Pierce.
I hope I'm not destroying his career here by saying so.
Wendell Pierce was in Ray Donovan last season.
He's been in suits.
He was in the wire.
I love Wendell Pierce.
He's a great actor.
He's going to play Clarence Thomas.
And you know who's going to play Anita Hill?
Carrie Washington of Scandal, the TV show.
I have no idea what Wendell Pierce's politics are.
He's a Hollywood actor, you can guess.
I have no clue.
It doesn't matter.
I just like the guy's work.
He was funny as hell.
He's a comedic actor when he wants to be dead serious.
Anyway, so that's how they do these.
And what all of this is going on out there, Bill Cosby telling lies about Clarence Thomas.
Here comes Hillary Clinton acting like she is God's gift to women who suffer sexual assault when she is married to a serial abuser.
Or someone who has been.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
This Rather book is, it's based on a book written by Mary Mapes.
And I'm kind of glad this is because they're going to be able to relive all those great parodies.
This whole cockamamie story was built on the lies of some informer named Bill, what was his name?
Bill Burkett, who claimed to have all these memos from the National Guard director where Bush didn't show up and didn't serve.
He was only there to get out of going to Vietnam, Bill Burkett.
And it was a powerline blog, which exposed the total fraud of it.
I mean, it even got to the point where they proved that some of the typewritten material could not have existed because typewriters that there were didn't exist.
I think this is the way it goes.
The typewriters that supposedly were used to make these documents haven't been in use for years or decades or some such thing.
It was conclusively proven that they made up the whole story.
See, here comes a movie.
I don't say Rather is innocent in the movie.
What the movie does is raise doubts about the conclusion that Dan Rather made it up and Mapes made it up and raises doubts about whether they should have been fired and actually focuses on evil corporate America for the way they fired the great Dan Rather and so forth.
So Rather went out there.
He went to the preview.
He went to the premiere.
You kidding me, Robert Redford.
Anyway, Rather said, you know, partisan political operatives, of course, a great deal to do with my stellar career.
Of course, I watched a movie with Partisan Political Operatives.
And I have to say that the thing I came away with is the truth.
Honestly, you have to do that in a movie.
Partisan political operatives did me in, you know, Robert Redford.
Okay.
Fine and dandy.
And Bill Cosby over here.
I know, I know, I got Trump.
Trump's, I just saw on CNN funniest thing.
I tried to get my phone out to take a quick picture of it, but it was a graphic, and then the graphic was gone by the time I got the phone up.
The idea to take a picture of it too late.
What it was was a list of potential pitfalls awaiting Trump, and then they had one for every candidate.
And the list of potential pitfalls for Trump was absurd.
It was everything that's already happened that should have done him in.
And here's CNN with a little graphics.
If any of these things happen, it could derail the Trump candidacy.
Everybody's on the lookout here, making sure they don't make drastic mistakes here that would derail their own campaigns.
And there are four things.
Like Trump could say something wrong about testing with a female interviewer.
It was silly stuff.
It was classic.
You had classic, formulaic, political, inside-the-belt way media pre-analysis that totally missed the real substance of this Republican campaign.
It was stark.
I wish I'd had my camera out, gotten a picture of it, so I could actually read the four points.
The pitfalls for Trump.
Anyway, we'll get to that too.
Your phone calls are coming up.
I have to take an obscene profit break now.
Sorry, folks.
Multitasking, taking care of unrelated matters here that cannot wait.
Not my words, people I'm dealing with.
But we're here.
Back at it, 800-282-2882 and the email address LRushbo at EIBnet.com.
Here's, grab something, number six.
This is Hillary on the Today Show.
I just want you to hear this.
I referenced it, but if you don't recall it, this is how it happened.
January 26, 1998, Hillary talking to Matt Wauer on the Today Show.
The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.
1998, this is Lewinsky time.
So that's why we make jokes.
Also, at the time, folks, I mean, Fox News has been up for a year.
It started in 1997.
The vast right-wing conspiracy was me.
I was the Mr. Big of the vast right-wing conspiracy.
So I started asking myself, okay, how did I arrange for Monica Lewinsky to be hired as an intern in the White House?
Then, how did I arrange for Monica Lewinsky to be assigned to the Oval Office on a date certain?
And then how did I order a pizza that would be delivered to Monica Lewinsky, who would then in turn deliver it to the President Clinton in the Oval Office?
How did I pull all of that off?
And then, after making all of that happen, how did I arrange for Clinton and Lewinsky to end up in a little study there off the Oval Office?
And how did I arrange for a cigar to be at the president's disposal?
And how do I arrange for Monica Lewinsky to be possession of a blue dress?
I mean, how did I do all this?
Well, let me tell you something.
I know they were paranoid about, you know, why don't laugh about this.
Don't forget this New York Magazine story from a couple of weeks ago explaining why Hillary has her own private email server.
Don't forget this, folks.
In the first two paragraphs of that story, The lead of that story explaining Hillary's paranoia was because I had somehow succeeded in leaving a note under the pillow in the Lincoln bedroom on inauguration night, 1993.
Harry and Linda Bloodworth Thomason staying in the Lincoln bedroom that night.
There was indeed a note from me that night, and it was indeed under the pillow.
And this article referenced it twice, and Mrs. Clinton's biography that nobody bought and nobody read references it twice.
That she was really paranoid.
How in the world did that happen?
It's their White House, their president.
How does a note from me get in there?
And then there was a reference to furniture being moved.
So the clear implication was that Mrs. Clinton's paranoia is legitimate.
You know, just because you're paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you.
And Mrs. Clinton's paranoia richly deserved because I had invaded, of all things, the privacy of the White House.
So, and that was five years prior to her claim here on the Today Show with Matt Wower.
So, Mr. Big vast right-wing conspiracy.
It's the way history repeats sometimes, like this Mary Mapes and Dan Rather and Robert River, whatever movie.
It's just the left just can't leave things alone.
So, I had to work late last night.
I parked in the garage.
I walked into the kitchen.
Catherine got home a bit before I did.
I walked in.
She's laughing herself silly.
The TV's on.
The dogs are going crazy.
Look, it's Trump up there.
▲
Export Selection