All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 18, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:50
August 18, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 247 podcast.
Right here it is.
Where have you heard this before?
In a U.S. News and World headline, U.S. News and World Report headline the power of the post presidency.
How Obama Aims to Stay in the Game.
Where have you heard that before?
I wonder who you heard that from.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you.
Rush Limboa here, the EIV network and the Limbo Institute.
For advanced conservative studies, the telephone number, if you want to join us, it's 800 282-2882, the email address, El Rushbo at EIB net.com.
We had a phone call on this program back on June 4th.
It was from a proud mother named Sally.
She was from Maryland.
And she told us that her daughter was soon to be graduating from Ranger School.
Remember.
And lo and behold, the two female Ranger students left in Ranger School gonna be the first women to ever graduate from the grueling course on Friday.
The confirmation comes a day after a report from the Havoc Journal, which stated President Obama was set to attend the ceremony, prompting speculation that the commander in chief would likely not choose to attend at least at least one woman was going to graduate.
Imagine that.
Here you have Ranger School graduate ceremonies, and Obama might show.
But if he does, everybody knows it's only because at least one of the women is going to graduate.
Well, we had one of these women, it's two of them, it turns out that are going to graduate.
And I, folks, the Rangers.
The Rangers are the guys that climb straight up Poinduho.
The invasion of Omaha Beach, it's down the beach from Omaha Beach.
If you ever, ever have a chance to go to France, make time to get up to Normandy and go to Omaha Beach and the American cemetery.
you will not have a more somber moment in your life.
And then make sure you see Poin Duho and go actually where Reagan delivered a speech there.
Uh, one of his greatest speeches ever, The Boys of Pointo Ho, and just take a look.
Stand where the German gunners were to look down and just imagine a never-ending parade stream of Rangers climbing straight up.
And they eventually seated and took those German gun positions, and it was the beginning of the retaking of France.
Now the Rangers Special Forces, you know, you you hear about women firefighters and women cops, and you wonder if standards were relaxed in order for them to qualify because of obvious physical differences.
And I can't, in all candor, I can't see this happening in in Ranger School.
I've been to Ranger School.
Remember the old story with Sergeant Major Ivanov?
What a day that was a Fort Bragg.
And it's it's whatever happened.
I mean, it's a major, major achievement.
And I saw this today, and I remembered that one of these Ranger candidates' mothers had called this program.
Uh and Obama is is gonna show up and horn in on it, of course, uh, aligning himself uh with the female aspect of this.
But Sally, if you're out there, I just want to let you know that we remembered your call, and we send our congratulations to you and your daughter.
Once again, try this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm getting you Hillary and the in the the server in the bathroom.
How much how much more entertaining can this get?
You're gonna get there in just a second.
You've got to hear this though, folks.
This is from Gulfnews.com.
It's obviously a Middle Eastern website.
It's from Bahrain or Bach Rein, actually.
Saudi social media users have poured scorn on a fat law.
There's a new Fat Law that permits I shouldn't laugh here.
There's a new FET law that permits young women married to ugly women to take drugs before intimate relations in order to have the delusion they are as beautiful as models.
A fet was said that the hallucinogenic drugs can be taken for 30 minutes during sexual incourse, intercourse, and only by men who are under 40.
The drugs can be used only in the evening, according to the fatwa.
Quote, this is the ideal men who are unfortunately married with ugly looking wives so that they can see them under the effects of the drugs as beautiful women or as lovely nymphs, says the fatwa.
There's a term here used to describe beautiful women called Hori, H-O-U-R-I.
It's a Quranic, as in Quran, the Holy Quran.
It's a Quranic term referring to to be beautifully dark-eyed.
Women in heaven.
Now, the origin of the fatwa is not known, although some users attributed it to a to a to a figure Morocco.
But it went viral on the internet.
It sparked a huge debate in which most people expressed shock and sarcasm.
Really?
I wonder if this fatwa, this does this sound real.
I wonder if this fatwa is as mythical as the supposed fatwa from the Ayatollah hominy forbidding research on nuclear weapons in Iran.
You know, Obama cites that fatwa.
Or has the supposed fatwa, the Ayatollah hominy has put out a fatwa prohibiting the development of nuclear weapons in Iran.
Which means, why do we even need a deal then?
I mean, a fatwa, that's a religious command statement.
That's it is what it is type of thing.
And nobody can find it, even though it has been referred to by many times.
Now, the uh a blogger reacting to this fatwa said that drugs should never be allowed in Islam, regardless of the reason.
This fatwa is utter nonsense, she says.
She's a blogger.
The men who believe their wives are not good looking and need to live an illusion, even if it is for fleeting minutes, can simply switch off the light and use their imagination to think she's a superstar.
They don't need drugs for it.
Does that work?
Turning off the lights and using her imagination.
How do you know it doesn't work?
You fell for that.
How do you know it doesn't work?
I love it, folks.
I you never know what you're gonna find when you begin digging deep for show prep here on the EIB network.
A fatwa.
What?
Wait a minute, it was a movie.
They made a movie about this fatwa.
Oh, who was in that movie?
What was the name of that movie?
Shallow Hell.
Oh, shallow H A L E. Shallow Hail, so it's a guy named Hale.
So Jack Black and Gwyneth Paltrow, and wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Did Jack Black was having sex with Gwenneth Paltro and needed a drug?
To make him think she was attractive?
Gwyneth Paltrow was 300 pounds in this movie.
She was.
Okay, so he imagined her being with a drug.
So we've already done this in Western culture.
Hey, we are spreading Western culture to Islam.
If we've already made a movie about this and it had Gwyneth Paltrow in it as a 300-pound babe, Jack Black takes a drug to imagine her as a model type.
And here we now have a fatwa in Bahrain permitting hallucinogenic drugs.
Oh, my friends.
James Harrison, I mentioned this at the very beginning of the program yesterday, and I said at the end of the program yesterday that we were going to get into it in more detail today, and lo and behold, here we are.
Now, if you missed it, James Harrison, number 92 and an outside linebacker for the Pittsburgh Steelers at 3-4 defense, which means he rushes the passer.
He is one of the most feared linebackers in the National Football League.
One of the most fined.
He has the man has been through a success track that are like the myths you hear.
Except his is true.
His dad was a truck driver.
He wanted to play football.
He went to Kent State.
He, I don't think it was drafted.
Shows up at the Steelers as a free agent.
They cut him, I think they cut him twice.
He keeps coming back.
He keeps trying, finally makes the team, stays on the team as a backup, and finally, after being with him four or five years, gets the chance to start in a in the last game of the season.
They're going to the playoffs, the last game is meaningless.
And uh if if the other I think it's against the Buffalo Bills, and if the Bills win this game, Steelers have no reason to win.
They don't need to win to get to the playoffs.
Their slot is already determined, but the Bills need to win to get in.
The Steelers are playing their second string scrubs.
They end up winning James Harrison has a breakout game, and it was all over from that point.
If you've watched Super Bowls, you remember James Harrison with a 99-yard return for a touchdown interception off Kurt Warner over in Tampa.
Uh game against the Arizona Cardinals.
Anyway, what happened was Harrison came home and discovered that his two sons had been given participation trophies.
And he flipped out.
In his world, you don't get a trophy for showing up.
In his world, you don't get a trophy for trying hard.
In his world, you only get a trophy trophy when you achieve something, when you succeed something.
And when you succeed at something, it's rare and become a champion.
So he took a picture of the two trophies and he posted them on Instagram.
And he said, I came home to find out that my boys received two trophies for nothing.
Participation trophies.
While I'm very proud of my boys for everything they do, and I'll encourage them until the day I die, these trophies will be given back until they earn a real trophy.
And then he writes this.
So I'm sorry, I'm not sorry for believing that everything in life should be earned.
And I'm not about to raise two boys to be men by making them believe they're entitled to something just because they tried their best.
Because sometimes your best isn't enough.
And that should drive you to want to do even better.
Not cry and whine until somebody gives you something to shut you up and keep you happy.
He concluded with a hashtag Harrison Family Values.
Now this could have gone any number of ways.
In our supposedly, that's an important qualifier there.
In our supposedly dominated by political correctness world, what should have happened is that James Harrison should have been written out of pop polite society.
Because this is a violation of everything political correctness has inserted itself in it in the sense of raising children.
In school, there are no winners, there are no losers because they don't keep score.
There are no starters and there are no bench players because everybody plays.
You get trophies for simply showing up.
We are never allowed to crown champions because not everybody can beat one, and to do so humiliates those who lose, and we will not get...
This is supposedly the law of the land.
Supposedly everybody falls in line with it.
And you would think that James Harrison would be just excoriated, just ripped to shreds, but it didn't happen.
The overwhelming response to James Harrison was overwhelming unilateral support.
Teachable moment here, folks.
I'm going to take you back.
Want you to listen to something I said on this program way, way back on May 1st of this year.
Now, it happened to be a comment made during the controversial moments of gay marriage, but it relates.
You will see, here it is.
How can such a small number of people come to so dominate the American political System.
How can less than a million people cause the havoc that they caused in Indiana recently?
How can so few people end up closing down businesses like flower shops or bakeries or photo shops or what have you?
It's fascinating to me to watch it transpire and watch hardly any opposition rise up against it.
It's the only way it can happen.
No pushback.
And it's exactly what is happening.
We are being run.
This country is being run by a veritable minority, and that is of liberalism.
Liberals are a minority of thought.
The percentage of the country that's liberal is less than 50.
It's not a majority.
But where are they?
They are in the classroom.
They're running colleges, universities, high schools, school systems.
They are running the media.
News, movies, books, television shows.
So the impression, particularly with the control of the media, the impression is that they are much larger in number than they are, much more widespread than they are, and much more powerful than they are.
By the way, I think contained in this is an answer so many people are asking about Trump.
How in the world can Trump be doing so well?
The answer is he's just nuking all of that.
Trump is not putting up with it.
He's not being bullied by minorities, is not permitting himself to be bullied.
He's taking it to them.
There isn't anything politically correct about him.
And everything else, in addition to whatever he's doing, immigration, all these other things that he's taking on, the very fact that Donald Trump may beat back political correctness and signal everybody that it's okay to do that could be one of the biggest wins out of this whole thing.
Political correctness is censorship, it is stifling, and it is bullying, and it's being practiced by a veritable minority of people.
And Trump is not allowing himself to be steamrollered.
And to show you that I think it is a minority, here's a montage of all the people in the media.
I mean it's from ESPN liberals at ESP and liberals in the media.
A montage of people commenting on James Harrison, making his sons give back their participation trophies.
Well how about James Harrison, he's absolutely right about it.
His kids are going to be angry with him and hopefully better off down the road.
This is the right message.
I think he is absolutely right.
I completely 1,000 percent agree with James Harrison.
I think he's right on a money with this.
If I did have kids and they brought those trophies home to me, I'd say get rid of them.
I understand exactly what James Harrison's talking about.
Not everybody can be a winner.
As somebody who started every year I was in high school, I would have been outraged by receiving a participation show if you know actually do something to like earn the trophy.
I think he's going to be father of the year.
Look, it's a perfect example of what I'm saying.
Here you have a series of leftists all over the media agreeing.
You would think they would back up the PC version.
You would think these are the people that would rake Harrison over the coals for being insensitive and not understanding the plight of children, how they all can't be champions and so forth, and yet everybody falls in line.
I'm telling you, the people running this PC scam, like everybody running the scam of liberalism is a tiny bunch.
They are a minority, and Trump is illustrating once again how they can be pushed back against and overridden.
And that is another positive out of all this.
Well, the media world shocked yet again today, ladies and gentlemen, by the Trumpster.
Donald Trump had jury duty yesterday.
He during his lunch break went out and turned on this program.
After jury duty, he tweeted that he had done just that, that he had turned on this program.
And uh I don't have a tweet right in front of me.
Great guy, great show, whatever, uh, listening to Rush Limbaugh.
The media was beside themselves.
Even over at Fox, here we have Fox and Friends a discussion about Trump and jury duty yesterday.
Number three, what did he do during lunch?
He went out and listened to Rush Limbaugh on the radio.
At which time he tweeted his appraise of Russia's a talk show.
Why would he do that?
Why would he do that?
Because that's what he did.
Why would he do it?
Trump tells people what he thinks and what he did.
That's what he did it.
After Ducey plays the clip, they played a clip of what I said on the program yesterday.
Now I don't have time to get this in before the break.
It's a 53 second bite.
By the way, the clip that I have coming up, they it's been all over uh Fox today, with people analyzing it and commenting on it.
And we'll we'll give you a taste of that from the Fox and Friends program.
But uh Bill Hammer used it later in the day on Fox and so forth.
But uh I I didn't even know it.
I didn't even know that Trump had tweeted.
I don't tweet, as you know.
And nobody had tweeted it to me.
I didn't I didn't know this happened until I got here this morning, and somebody told me it happened on television.
So I tracked down the tweet.
And that's how I learned that Trump had left jury duty lunch to go out and listen to this program yesterday, and then had tweeted about what a pleasurable, enjoyable, and enlightening entertaining experience it had been.
So, quick timeout, and yeah, we're gonna get to Hillary and the server in the bathroom.
Yeah, it's just waiting.
It's set up on a T for me here, folks, so don't go away.
Welcome back, folks.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
So Donald Trump goes out for lunch in the midst of jury duty yesterday in New York, and at the end of jury duty, the end of lunch, actually, on the way back into jury duty, he tweeted out, listening to Rush Limbaugh on way back to jury duty.
Fantastic show, terrific guy.
And the media isn't why would he say that?
Why would he do that?
Brian Kilmer, why would he do that?
Anyway, it was shocking throughout the media, but uh in in some sectors, particularly the conservative media.
It led, however, to discussions of another thing that I said on the program yesterday, and they played the soundbite for other guests on Fox and other people react to it.
We'll start with Fox infringement.
It's been used all morning long.
Just to keep you in the loop here, what's happening with your host?
We start here with Steve Deucey, and this is all about immigration.
Here's how the segment went.
The whole country is talking about how Donald Trump has got a plan, and it is detailed.
And Rush Limbaugh was actually talking about on his show yesterday, even though it's a radio show.
There's television pictures of it.
Here he is.
The inside the beltway people, when they hear that, they cringe, oh my God, don't say that's what Republicans.
Oh, God.
Sixteen people running for the presidency, and 15 of them are perceived.
I know they would argue with this, but 15 of them are perceived to have essentially the same policy on immigration.
One of them is entirely different from the other 15, and he's the one who's leading.
I don't think these people have any idea.
Just how angry, frightened, fearful.
A pretty big majority of the people of this country are that we are losing the country.
You can almost hear Donald Trump tweeting his praise of the Rush Limbaugh.
Aha, so there they have it.
They think Trump heard that.
And that's why he tweeted out.
It could be.
You never know.
It could be.
So later on, they have analysts coming in, you know, and they have people come in experts to explain to people what I meant, whether I was right or wrong.
And here comes Judge Napolitano.
Steve Deucey says what Trump has done, he worked with Senator Sessions from Alabama, and they came up with this very comprehensive immigration plan.
It's a dream list for many who have wanted immigration reform for a long time.
It involves everything.
I fully agree with you, Steve, but some of them, the impediments are extraordinary.
Others.
Rush Limbaugh is right.
Donald Trump is the only one.
I don't agree with him on a lot of things, but he is the only one saying this with clarity, with purpose, and in a comprehensive uh nature.
I suggest to you some of the other Republicans are going to jump on that bandwagon.
Nah, well, we'll hold off on that for a little while up.
Next is Carl Rove.
And this again on Fox and Friends.
Steve Deucey said to Carl Rove, the point Rush Limbaugh makes is that there's a large crowd running on the Republican side.
So many of them seem alike in Russia's estimation.
What do you make of that, Carl?
He's right with the emphasis on the word perceived.
There are people who have thought-out ideas that differ from other ideas that others are out postulating, but right now the attention is being put on Trump.
I'm not certain that's necessarily good for Trump.
In July, Gallup did a poll, and 31% of Republicans had essentially what his position is: run them all out of the country, deport them all.
Now, his is actually a little bit more extreme than that.
His is deport them all, even if they're children who are born in the United States.
50% said they ought to be able to stay here after passing certain requirements, so this may not help them over the long haul.
Let's go to the polling data that was referred to there.
It's a CNN poll.
And you know what's interesting about this poll?
Let me read to you the uh uh the uh last paragraph of the poll.
The poll finds evidence of a slight gender wait that that that uh wait a minute.
This is not this paragraph doesn't.
The poll is a is supposedly a Republican poll.
A poll of Republican registered voters.
Half of the sample is independents who lean Republican.
I have never heard of this.
I looked into this, I found out that CNN does this for Democrats too.
They go on, they do a poll exclusively of Republicans or Democrats, and then they call or they they consider to be independents who are leaning, in this case Republican, to be registered Republicans when they're not.
You know, by definition, an independent can change his or her mind on a whim.
Well, so can any registered voter for that matter?
If you're gonna go out and do a poll of registered voters, why do you make half the sample independence-leaning Republican?
Now, I I know that the drive-bys and the inside of way establishment are obsessed with independence, they always have been, but I just didn't know this happened.
And I thought, I wonder if they do this for Democrats.
I looked into it, and they do.
They do the same thing when they do polls exclusively for Democrats.
Now, what did the poll say?
Well, this CNN poll says that Trump is pulling away from everybody.
And like we mentioned to you the other day, yesterday, there's these two academics, one from Berkeley, one from Stanford, who've done an exhaustive survey of the American people, and they've found that Trump's immigration proposal is not as I don't want to use the word radical, but I guess I will just to make the point here.
Trump's immigration proposal falls short of things a majority of Americans actually support.
Let's put it that way.
So while Trump is perceived to be way out there, and Trump is perceived to be extreme on this, he doesn't even get close, but he is still not as intent on this issue as a majority of the American people.
It's what these two academics found out.
Now, this is pretty amazing stuff from CNN to have to report this, and I'm sure it choked them to write it.
Especially the stuff about how much the party, which is really the base, trusts Trump when it comes to the economy, immigration, and dealing with ISIS.
What this poll indicates is that Trump's support goes beyond his immigration positions.
Within the Republican Party, the base.
This poll says that Republicans trust Trump on the economy.
They trust Trump on immigration and dealing with ISIS.
Here's how they write it.
Donald Trump has won his party's trust on top issues more than any other Republican presidential candidate, and now stands as the clear leader in the race for the Republican nomination, according to a new CNN poll.
The survey finds that Trump, with the support at 24% of Republican registered voters.
It's just down one point from the Fox poll yesterday had Trump at 25%, so it's consistent.
The survey finds that Trump, with the support of 24% of Republican registered voters, his nearest competitor, Jeb Bush, is at 13%.
That's 11 points behind.
Now, in the Fox poll, Ben Carson's in second place, followed by Cruz.
Just behind Jeb Bush is Ben Carson in the CNN poll at 9%.
Then Rubio and Scott Walker at 8%.
Wan Paul at six, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, John Kasich, all Are in at 5% the CNN poll with Mike Huckabee in the top 10, but down at 4%.
CNN did not even include the name Chris Christie in their poll, even though he shows up with 3%.
Trump is the biggest gainer in the poll.
He's up six points since July.
He's up six points since the debate.
According to the first nationwide CNN poll since the candidates debated in Cleveland on August 6th.
Next up was uh Ben Carson gaining five points.
Fiorina four points.
All of that confirmed in the Fox poll the previous day.
Trump has also boosted his favorability numbers among Republicans.
58% now have a favorable view of Trump.
58%, folks of the Republican Party.
Now again, keep in mind, this sample is not of Republicans.
It's Republicans and independence leaning Republican.
I don't know.
Something about that just doesn't jibe with me, but they do it for Democrats too, so we'll call it a wash and leave it there.
I'm just curious about the methodology.
If you're going to go out and do a poll of Republicans, why include independence leaning Republican?
Unless your aim is to show the support for a candidate is uh broad based, goes beyond the party, or doesn't, depending on the results from candidate to uh candidate.
On the economy, illegal immigration, Trump is far and away the top choice, even among those Republicans who support somebody else for the nomination.
33% who say they will most likely vote for somebody else, say Trump is their most trusted on the economy.
29% who say they'll probably vote for somebody else, say Trump is their most trusted on illegal immigration.
Trump is also the most trusted on social issues.
19% say he's their top choice to handle that.
Second place, George or Jeb Bush at uh at 15%.
And you know what else?
The cherry on top here, the PSDS, the CNN poll finds evidence of a gender gap in support for Trump.
In other words, a majority of Republican women support Trump, more support him than do not.
Everything's being stood on its head here.
And in similar polls on a Democrat side, it's j as as good as it is for Trump, it is devastatingly bad for Hillary.
It's gotten to the point for Hillary that her supporters, one of her big time supporters, has actually written a piece begging her to get out before her reputation is destroyed.
Get out now, get out clean, get out with dignity, get out now before it ruins you.
From one of her main big time supporters.
You haven't heard of this person, but this person's a big intellectual.
I can uh it's in the UK telegraph or the day they may or one of those papers.
Anyway, I quick time out here, folks, but we've got much more straight ahead.
Hang in there, be tough, be right back.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh emitting vocal vibrations, rhetoric, and resonance.
Coast to coast.
And here's Adrian in Stockton, California.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Adrian, hi.
Hey, I've been listening to you for years, and I really appreciate you.
One of the things that you've always said is that you've always been try to be impartial, you know, on how you present everything.
And I think unintentionally you're presenting.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
No, I've never said that I'm impartial.
I have admitted my biases.
I've admitted what I'm in favor of.
I've admitted people and things I support, and I've openly uh stated my opposition to things and people I don't support.
I'm I've never pretended.
Don't don't saddle me with that.
That's that's bogus.
Okay, okay.
What I what I what I'm uh talking about basically is the fact that here it is, you have Ted Cruz running, right?
And it's and I'm a character guy, which I believe that's who you are.
You said a man character is what's supposed to be in the office.
I have said so, yes.
I have, you're exactly right.
Characters over the long haul.
Right there in the Federalist Papers, it is discussed why character matters in the executive.
I've I've quoted it, I've said you're exactly right about that.
And character is something that's usually over the long haul.
Yeah, it can change.
People can learn things and they can grow, but usually it's not an overnight thing.
Now it seems like I could be wrong that with with Donald Trump it's an overnight thing.
That all these uh changes are being made, and the media is highlighting these things where it's make which is propelled this guy because he's it seems like an overnight thing that he's grabbing on to all the things that a conservative would that we know we that we don't like about what uh Obama's been doing and the liberal uh people have been doing.
But the reason why I'm saying this though is because why highlighting that and that Donald Trump is doing that, the person that seems to be in the shadow is someone who's been standing for that stuff for years, and that's Ted Cruz.
He's been he's been doing the same thing.
If I'm not mistaken, is there a question here, Adrian?
The questi well the question is do you feel you could be in because I've always I've always uh I've heard you say that I'm uh that you're uh an entertainer.
I can translate this, folks.
Yeah.
And I'm gonna go to the question.
I'm sorry.
I heard I I heard you say that you're an entertainer.
Yeah, but to me, you're also more than that, and I believe you know that.
And so uh you sometimes you have to walk softly.
I think what this is what I am what okay, well what let me let me let me jump in here and translate what you're getting at, because I know exactly what you're getting at.
Uh and I've I've said I'm an entertainer, but I've I've said that I done do something that is not common in the media, and that is the combination of irreverent, sarcastic, parodic humor, and serious discussion of issues with credibility on both.
I've pointed out as an illustration in the old days of nightline, if Ted Coppola come out an open nightline with a 10-minute joke monologue, people say, what the hell is this?
It's not what I'm watching this for.
And consequently, if Johnny Carson had come out and done a 20-minute monologue on dead serious political issues before getting to the jokes, people I do both.
I cross over seamlessly from one to the other.
You never know when it happens.
So I don't deny I'm an entertainer, this is a show biz.
But I also don't deny that I am deadly serious about the things I care about.
And I definitely want certain things, ideas to triumph, and others to lose.
Big time.
So you what you're doing, I know your question is.
We've had some seminar callers on this recently.
I know exactly what's going on here.
His use of the word impartial to what he meant to say was you never endorsed during primaries.
That's what he meant.
So why are you supporting Trump?
That's what all of that meant.
That's what he was dancing around trying to get to.
Why are you supporting Trump when a guy like Ted Cruz is everything Trump is but the character to boot?
And ladies and gentlemen, let can I This is very difficult.
Can I ask you a question, rhetorical question?
Those of you who've been listening here for at least well, it shouldn't take more than five years.
But let's say you've been listening the last 10, 15, 20 years.
Are you confident that everything I do, are you aware?
Do you remember?
Do you take into account, do you fall on to you to rely on your experience with this program?
Combined with the intelligence you use listening to this program.
Do you understand that I always have a purpose?
Do you realize nothing is haphazard?
You're wondering why I'm supporting Trump.
Who says I am?
Have I announced specifically that I am, or are you perceiving it?
The better question would be if you think that, why?
And I can't go any further.
I did with my brother last night, it's on record if I have to go back and prove this.
And I told Snerdley this morning about this, but I can't go any further here.
It is what it is.
I know it's a cliche.
I have to take a break.
When we get back, we're going to talk about bathrooms in Denver.
Where Hillary Clinton's email server was parked.
You don't want to miss it.
▲
Export Selection