All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 14, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
August 14, 2015, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we're back, folks.
Great to have you with us.
The Rush Limbaugh program and the EIB network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies on Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in the United States.
Telephone number.
It's 800-2882, the email address, Hill Rushbow.
At EIB net.com.
Whatever you want to talk about, fine and dandy.
Doesn't matter.
If I don't care about it, I'll either fake that I do care about it, or I'll just deal with it.
It's a golden opportunity.
Or you take the program.
If you'd like perfect example.
If you think I'm not criticizing somebody enough, you think I'm praising somebody too much.
Whatever.
If you have a complaint, this is the day.
To see what you can do with it.
If you have something you want to talk about that has not been discussed anywhere, you think it's important, that's another golden opportunity that exists.
And again, the number 800-282-2882.
Now, just to finish this Chris Steyrwalt piece, because the it's about the latest poll here from American Crossroads.
Six.
Make or break swing states, Hillary Clinton now trailing any Republican, a generic Republican opponent by 13 points.
Now, I think polls this early.
I'm suspect of all polls, as you know.
I mean, I go back and forth on their accuracy and their impact and their purpose even.
Because I think in many instances, polling data is not really being used to find and reflect public opinion, but rather to shape it, to make it.
And we are still what was 16 months, uh 15 months away from the election.
And I don't know in terms of who's going to win the election, what polls mean today.
Now they do have meaning in terms of fundraising.
They can impact momentum and this kind of thing.
So there is some relevance.
But the point is when you when you compare the polling data that Mrs. Clinton is racking up, and it's not good.
I mean, she's plunging and plummeting in a lot of key areas, both uh attitudinal and actual voter support.
And then you remember that it's happened before.
2008.
That's not insignificant, folks.
It really it's it's amazing, in fact, how it's replaying itself here.
Now, Bernie Sanders is no Barack Hussein Oh, which makes this even more incredible, if you ask me.
Now you heard F. Chuck Todd say in the soundbite we played, in his own words that that Bernie Sanders is not gonna be the nominee.
In fact, F. Chuck, find his exact words on this.
Not Bernie Sanders, who some people don't think is electable.
But maybe Gore, maybe Gore, maybe John Kerry gets back in again, maybe Biden.
But the real key here is it's not gonna be Bernie Sanders, who some people don't think's electable.
Well, why do some people think that?
Bernie Sanders is the only excitement Democrat race right now.
Bernie Sanders, the only guy drawing any crowds.
Bernie Sanders is the only guy whose crowds are energetic.
And here you have the powers that be in the Democrat Party led by Chuck Todd of NBC News, basically writing him off.
It's a tandem out admission that whatever's going on with Bernie Sanders is irrelevant, but Bernie Sanders is causing a world of hurt to Hillary Clinton.
For a guy that's unelectable to be causing her so much polling data, what in the world must it say about her?
Do not doubt for a moment that in the bowels of the Democrat Party, where the polyps and all that stuff are, there is panic galore over this.
And I don't think it's strictly about this email controversy and server.
It's over these polls that show she's not popular.
She's not trusted.
She's not liked.
And that's a repeat of 2008.
And so is what's happening with Bernie Sanders, except as I say he's not Obama.
Nobody said Obama's unelectable.
I've explained on previous occasions why Bernie Sanders is not electable.
Why Bernie Sanders, not that he's not electable.
He's not going to get the nomination.
The Democrat Party, if they have to run their own ads against him, is not going to get going to let Bernie Sanders win the nomination.
And the reason is very simple.
One of the grandest illusions in politics today that survives is that the Democrat Party is in solidarity with the little guy.
And the Democrat Party is out to get Wall Street.
And the Democrat Party is out to get corporate America.
The Democrat Party is the friend of the little guy and the enemy of big business.
Well, Bernie Sanders believes that.
Bernie Sanders is out campaigning on that, but the secret is, or the illusion is the Democrat Party is in bed with probably 80% of the major CEOs in this.
The Democrat Party is in bed with over 80% of Wall Street and its money.
The Democrat Party is so immersed in cronyism with big corporate and big money everywhere that there's no way they're going to because Bernie Sanders really believes the old school thought that the Democrat Party stands for the little guy, that the Democrat Party is there to punish all of these rich CEOs and corporate chiefs in Wall Street.
The Democrats are not going to let Bernie Sanders get anywhere near tearing apart the relationships they've built up.
This grand delusion.
Besides that, Mrs. Clinton hasn't even started her ad campaign on the poor guy yet.
He has no clue what's ahead of him.
He really doesn't.
I mean, he's going to be hit from so many fronts at all sides.
He's not going to know what happened about a day after it starts.
And his supporters are going to be ticked off.
Because it's going to be it they're going to take him out.
But they're not happy with Hillary.
And the polling data here pretty much says that this email scandal and the server stuff, I don't think anybody's worries he's going to get indicted or go to jail or any of that, but all of this is adding up to the same doubts and the same fears and concerns that existed in 2008.
And what happened in 2008?
The Democrat Party happily threw her under the bus.
I'm just saying it can and probably will happen again.
No matter how adept she is at escaping the locked jaw of scandal.
No matter how adept she and her husband are at slithering out of these things, there are other things that are going to stand in the way.
The EPA administrator.
This is the woman who Gina McCarthy should have been forced to resign after what she did poisoning that river.
That was an EPA.
It wasn't BP oil.
It wasn't some evil corporation.
That was an incompetent EPA chief.
And you know what they were doing?
They were setting, they they caused this disaster.
This is the theory from people that live out there.
That this thing was done on purpose so that it would qualify for superfund.
Which is another way of saying qualify for massive federal cleanup dollars.
They created a polluted mess in order to get more federal money, and the EPA was complicit in it.
Well, anyway, this woman is out now.
Gina McCarthy said Tuesday that climate change affects everything and everyone we love, including our ability to secure a livelihood.
Climate change is one of the most important issues that we face, she says.
It's a global challenge, but in many ways, it's also very personal to all of us because it affects everything and everyone we love.
It affects our kids.
It affects our communities.
It affects even our ability to earn a decent living.
Is that what happened to Detroit?
So we finally known it was climate change that did Detroit in?
Is that what happened in New Orleans?
Is that what's happening in California?
Climate change is responsible for all of this.
Hot damn.
I had no idea.
Climate change is why 94 million Americans aren't working.
Climate change affects our ability to earn a decent live.
The only thing it affects your ability to earn a decent living is the Democrat Party.
Because the Democrat Party is the home of modern day extreme liberalism.
Call it whatever you want.
Socialism, Marxism, what have you.
And then, ladies and gentlemen, this is from Discovery News.
Our share of the 2015 natural resources we have already used.
That means water.
That means air.
That means natural gas, whatever.
Oil, natural resource, whatever we've used so far, we have used our share.
And anything beyond this point that we use, we are stealing from other peoples in the world.
Less than eight months into 2015, humanity has exhausted its yearly allotment of natural resources.
A report from the Global Footprint Network, named August 13th as Earth Overshoot Day.
It's an annual marker of human overconsumption.
The report compares humankind's resource consumption with the planet's ability to produce natural resources.
Two measurements that have become increasingly out of sync in recent years.
Since the turn of the century, Earth Overshoot Day has moved up from October to August.
Now, according to the Global Footprint Network, the upcoming United Nations Conference of Parties in Paris will be integral in deciding the future of our planet.
If the world community agrees to cut carbon emissions by 30% over the next 15 years, overshoot day would be pushed back a whole month.
Without such action, overshoot day would move up to June by 2030.
I have a question here.
I'm just going to read the mayor of Realville.
Less than eight months into 2015, humanity has exhausted its yearly allotment of natural resources.
Well, then how come there's some left?
If we have exhausted our yearly allotment of natural resources, then why are we still breathing?
I was just able to go to the fridge and get a bottle of strawberry flavored water right next to a bottle of two if by tea, raspberry flavored.
Why is that available?
When I went into the bathroom, I turned on the faucet.
You know what happened?
There was water there.
But we've over we've over shot our annual allotment.
What who's who says what our annual allotment is?
Who even knew there was a limit?
And who gets to set the limit?
This is so full of it.
This is an absolute mind-blowing crock.
Comparing humankind's resource consumption with the planet's ability to produce natural resources.
Seems to me that we've got plenty of water, we have plenty of air.
We've got more and more people not living in poverty than ever before.
What more do these people want?
Well, that's all of this is a smokescreen and a cover for some other political agenda.
It really isn't about all this.
From science recorder, humanity in ecological debt, says Global Think Tank.
The writer is a yoga teacher.
Not making this up.
Two stories here, basically on the same day about Earth Overshoot Day.
Humanity in ecological debt, says Global Think.
And these young millennial tech people that I they're going to eat this stuff up, they're gonna love it, they're gonna get scared, they're gonna get worried, and they're gonna report it.
Gonna blame America because we're the biggest consumers of these resources, and most of what we have we've stolen from other nations anyway, because we're rotten and evil.
The main reasons for deforestation are urbanization, timber harvest, harvesting certain ingredients for consumer items, and to create room for cattle ranching.
About half of the world's tropical forests have been burned or cut down.
And according to World Wildlife Fund, the planet continues to lose about 36 football fields of worth of trees every minute.
You know what they don't I think it's bogus, but you know what they don't tell you is how many football fields worth of trees are replanted at every moment.
Anyway, this is just more the same crock, just recycled, with a different way of presenting it.
And it illustrates the prime ingredient, does it not?
Guilt.
Mommy.
Mommy, mommy, we've overdo that there if you had to return today.
Have the money in school today.
We don't mean what do you mean, mommy, man?
Isn't going to mean they left everyone.
We've got mom, you gotta get different cards.
You get that's how it all happens inside your average American home.
Overused our share of research.
This is such a crime.
Meanwhile, the world continues to be raised out of poverty.
That cannot happen if all of this other stuff is.
It's a daily battle against lies, insanity, emotional distress, you name it.
But we are equipped.
We will keep on.
Brief time out, back with more after this.
What does it say about the Democrat Party bench, folks?
That if it isn't Hillary, look at who's thinking about getting in.
Biden?
Biden hadn't made it past a Democrat primary yet, in the two or three times he's tried.
Kerry?
John Kerry really?
He already lost in uh in 2004.
Yeah, Rush, but that was for the Iran deal.
That's my point.
And that was Russia, it was before you.
He raised a flag over Cuba.
Right.
So all this stuff's gonna help him.
Right.
And then Gore?
Al Gore.
Another loser.
I mean, this is the Democrat bench.
You know what it means?
It means the Democrats think that both those guys got the shaft.
Gore got the shaft of the Electoral College.
Kerry was swift voted.
They both should have won.
And in fact, the exit polls, which should have been the ones that were counted, had them both winning.
That's what the Democrats think.
Because the exit polls showed Kerry winning at five o'clock on election day.
They think the election was stolen.
Other than that, Martin O'Malley.
And on Tibba, the time Hillary trains in the Democrat Party trains everything, Bernie's gonna think he's on an LSD hit from 50 years ago by the time he ends up swimming, and what they're gonna do to him.
He's gonna be on a trip he's never gonna have seen before.
You watch Mark my words.
He's flying sitting pretty right now, but nobody's trained their sights on him.
That's coming.
In the meantime, Albert in San Francisco.
Albert, uh, you're next.
It's great to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
Hi, Rush.
I had a question for you.
Or uh, yeah, a question.
Two questions, actually.
So my wife and I saw um the best of enemies last week.
Um it's a documentary on the 68 debates between William F. Buckley and Gordon.
Uh one, I was kind of getting what you thought of that whole time period and that movie in general.
And so bring it back to today, uh, what do you think William F. Buckley would think of Donald Trump?
Uh well, okay.
I haven't seen the movie.
I haven't seen the documentary.
That era uh was a fantastic era.
Many of those debates, a couple of them actually occurred, I think on the Dick Cavot show.
Uh and Balti or Buckley insulted Gorvadal.
Uh I mean, with a with a homosexual slur.
That uh I don't think today would back then it was not even acceptable, but today it'd be doubly not acceptable.
Uh but it is different times.
Uh They were both literary, of course, and there was much less media then.
So those kind of things happen routinely, I think, in our culture today, just in different forms.
I think what Buckley would think of Trump, probably for S lessons there, take a look at what Buckley did to Pat Buchanan.
Pat Buchanan had written a couple of columns that were thought by many to be anti-Semitic in his references to Israel and the APAC, the lobbying group.
And Buckley did write a piece saying that he, after careful thought, did consider Buchanan to be anti-Semitic in those instances.
And Buckley, of course, succeeded in excommunicating the John Birch Society from the conservative movement and so forth.
So my guess is that Buckley would be amused and would get as much out of it as he could, but if at some point he would he would probably denounce Trump.
But then the question is what would Trump do, you know, after that.
We'll never know, of course.
But anyway, I tell you, they're firing at me all angles here, Snerdley.
They're finding their way through here, and you are putting them through to me here.
Don't think that I do not know what's going on here.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Rush Limbaugh into year 28.
Behind the golden EIB microphone.
Okay, well, let's let's stay let's keep this rolling here.
Pam Buchanan has a piece today, Republican elites call for purge of Trump.
And let me read to you some excerpts.
In the Cleveland debate, Donald Trump refused to commit to support whomever the Republican Party nominates in 2016.
Pat Buchanan says Trump would be wise to maintain his freedom of action, keep his options open.
Because Pat Buchanan says there is a plot afoot in the Washington Post Conservative Club to purge Trump from the Republican Party before the primaries began.
And then he quotes George Will.
A political party has a right to secure its borders, asserts George Will, a duty to exclude interlopers.
Buchanan writes that George Will wants Trump excommunicated and locked out of all Republican debates until he kneels and takes a loyalty oath to the nominee.
Marginalizing Trump carries no risk of alienating a substantial Republican cohort, George Will assures us, because Trumpites are neither Republicans nor conservatives.
Buchanan writes that according to the Washington Post-Conservative group, the Republican Party's better off without Trump supporters.
I'm just telling you what Buchanan says here.
He's quoting George Will as saying that it's impossible to marginalize Trump because the Trump supporters are not Republicans and they're not conservatives, so it's not going to be any big loss.
Then he goes to Michael Gerson, who is a former speech writer for George W. Bush, now a columnist at the Washington Post.
And Buchanan says that Gerson says establishment Republicans must quote make clear that Trump has moved beyond the boundaries of serious and civil discourse.
Buchanan writes that Michael Gerson dislikes the Trumpites as much as George Will.
Buchanan says that Gerson on CNN said that Trump's followers are xenophobic.
They have a resentment of outsiders, of a resentment of Mexico, China, and immigrants.
That it's more like a European right wing party.
Republicans can't incorporate that kind of thinking.
That's what Buchanan says, Gerson says.
Back to Buchanan.
If the Republican Party has no room for Trump's followers, it has no future.
For there simply aren't that many Chamber of Commerce and country club Republicans.
So Buchanan is saying here that these Republican elites have better be careful because the people they want to win with simply do not exist in nearly enough numbers to secure them victory.
There aren't enough Republicans that are members of country clubs.
And there aren't enough Republicans who are members of the Chamber of Commerce to overwhelm all the votes that Democrats are going to get.
Buchanan says that Gerson mentions with disgust the UK Independence Party and the National Front Party, France.
What do those parties have in common?
Well, both are anti the New World Order, says Buchanan.
Both these parties, the UK Independence Party and France's National Front, arose to recapture the lost independence and sovereignty of their nations from the nameless, faceless bureaucrats of Brussels and the European Union and the hacks there who now dictate the kinds of laws and societies that Brits and the French are permitted to have.
What motivates these folks is not all that different from what brought the farmers to Lexington Green and Concord Bridge and inspired colonists to stand by the original Tea Party boys in Boston.
Buchanan says that new parties arise and outsiders are drawn into politics to fill voids and vacuums created by the failure of incumbent parties and politicians.
Case in point, Buchanan says is Gerson's boss George W. Bush.
With the country united behind him after 9-11, Bush called for a war on an axis of evil of Iraq, Iran and North Korea that had nothing to do with 9-11.
Then persuaded Congress to authorize an invasion of Iraq to strip it of weapons of mass destruction it didn't have.
Cost 4,500 American dead, 35,000 wounded warriors, one trillion dollars sunk, 100,000 dead Iraqis, half a million widows and orphans, a country ravaged in a Mideast now awash in war and bloodshed.
Political result, says Buchanan, well, the Republicans lost both houses of Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008 to an anti-war Democrat senator whose voting record was identical to that of Bernie Sanders.
Yet, this is all Buchanan now, yet the leading establishment candidate of the Republican Party elites in national polls and cash raised is Jeb Bush, who took five days to concede the war his brother started may have been a mistake.
Our Beltway elites are demanding that Trump apologize for his remarks about women, but when have they apologized for having inflicted this disaster upon our nation in the Middle East?
Thursday, the Census Bureau revealed a record 42.1 million immigrants here legally and illegally.
A population explosion being driven by Mexicans still flooding across the border.
Is it really xenophobic?
Buchanan asks to ask if Americans approve of this?
This historic change in composition and character of the country they love?
Is it outrageous to ask whether there is a correlation between this massive infusion of unskilled semi-skilled labor from the third world and the stagnant and falling wages of native-born Americans?
Anyway, skipping forward to the end here, Buchanan says Trump should tell the GOP, using Neil Khan's favorite phrase, all options are on the table, and that includes the Samson option.
Trump should tell the GOP that if it continues to disrespect him and his followers, then he is prepared to do as the biblical hero Sampson did when blinded and mocked by the Philistines.
He pushed the pillars Apart and brought the temple down upon the heads of them all.
Okay.
That's Buchanan advising Trump to stay in and to stay in, and if he has to, to destroy the Republican Party in the process.
Those Philistines, them.
Right.
Now, Trump for his part.
He's back today saying that he thinks he's going to face Biden in the general election because Hillary is going to unravel.
He said today he believes Biden's going to edge out Clinton once her campaign's undone by the controversy over her use of this email server.
And this is according to Breitbart.
I think I think so, Trump said when asked if he can picture a fight with Biden in the general election next year.
It just looks like Hillary's gonna not be able to run.
It looks to me like that's what's gonna happen.
I hear this thing is big league, Trump added, of the email controversy.
You know what she was doing.
She was guarding from the president, seeing what she was doing.
Everybody knows she didn't want him seeing what she was doing.
She's never she's gonna unravel it.
It isn't gonna happen.
Biden's a guy I'm gonna have to beat.
And I'll beat Biden.
Biden's nothing.
I can beat Biden.
I can beat Hillary too.
I mean, it's not a contest.
Really, it doesn't matter.
I don't care who they throw at me.
I'm just telling you she's gonna implode, she's gonna unravel.
That's Trump.
And now we move on to the YouTube viewers view, hosted by Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, who have recently made a direct appeal to voters to black voters to stop burning down their own neighborhoods and start getting behind Trump.
I see your frustration.
And I can feel your pain.
Yeah.
But we can no longer take and parade the narrative Black Lives Matter in front of people when we don't feel like our own lives matter.
When we take and we burn down our neighborhood.
When we take and we kill our brothers and sisters.
When we rob from them.
Yeah.
When we do destructive things, what we're telling people is we don't care about our own lives, and sometimes that's why people can't care about us.
That's right.
They were not through, folks.
They we just paused that to give everybody a chance to breathe.
Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson continued.
Get behind the candidate, Mr. Donald Trump that's gonna do something for you.
That's gonna give you a handoff.
Yeah.
Instead of a handout, baby.
And see, I know we've been fed a narrative and we've been spoon-fed something.
But today we're gonna pick up our own folks and eat for ourselves.
And see, we be your sister.
We represent you.
We stand for you.
But we can't do that if you sitting down, burn down your community.
Listen.
That's embarrassing.
Let's get it together and let's get behind the candidate that's gonna make America great again.
And that's Mr. Donald Trump.
I can't wait till Trump is asked about these babes.
At some point that's got to happen.
I want to see what he says.
Back after this, folks.
Don't go over.
By the way, uh probably ought to mention the New York Observer.
How would you categorize or characterize the New York Observer?
On the on the left-right scale.
Yeah, they are kind of they're not they're not they're not your traditional New York Uber leftists.
Uh, but they've got a piece here.
The countless crimes of Hillary Clinton special prosecutor needed now.
This is in New York City, the observer.
Myriad criminal offenses apply to this conduct, and they're making it they're making a call and demand for a special prosecutor.
Here's the quote.
High time for a special prosecutor to be named to conduct a full investigation into Mrs. Clinton's likely commission of multiple felonies, including a conspiracy with Huma Abaddon, Cheryl Mills, and possibly others to violate multiple laws.
And they are not pulling any punches here.
It's as uh forceful and powerful a demand and indictment I have ever seen in what would be called a drive-by media.
Here's the here's Rob in Austin, Texas.
We head back to the phones and open line Friday.
Thank you for calling and waving, and welcome to the program, sir.
Thanks, Russia.
It's an honor.
Hey, uh, I know you've been talking about the millennials the last few weeks and kind of how they're not buying things and uh and all that.
And I have a 23 year old.
We just got married.
And uh the thing I noticed about him is that he wants to buy quality merchandise as opposed to just buying something until necessarily, you know, we bought him a PC for graduation.
He saved up enough money to buy himself a Mac.
Because he knew it was a better computer.
Um, clothing and other purchases that he makes as well.
So I'm not sure.
I mean, I can only speak for mine, but that's kind of the difference I see in maybe some of the past generations to where they just go out and buy disposables as opposed to buying really good quality things and saving money for that.
This is I know yours is anecdotal, and it's just one your son, just one one person.
Uh so you gotta factor that in.
I'm always amazed, however, by all of the reporting on whatever.
We went through a generation X, and we went through it with Generation Y. And there was there was one other generation with whatever the generation loser or whatever, now we're going through it with the millennials.
And the drive-by media reporting always tries to highlight the things about each young generation that the that I think the drive-bys like and think represent a vast improvement on the cultural losers that were their parents and grandparents.
An example of this is this so-called vast move into the sharing community.
And it's supposedly, it's it's it's reported with great zeal and approval that millennials they understand they're light years ahead of their moms and dads and people that are much older than them.
They're light years ahead.
They understand the stupidity of owning something and going into debt for your life to own something when you don't really own it, and instead willing to share everything from car rides to accommodations, living spaces to what have you.
And this is this is portrayed as enlightened, and I think there's always something missing in this.
There were there another aspect of this, I'll never forget this.
And it was it's in within the last two years.
It was a story, I know Snerdley, you'll remember this because we we made sort of a big deal about it.
Um there was a story in how millennial men just disdain automobiles.
They have no desire to own a car.
Now, this were millennials who had no money to buy one anyway, and lived in places like San Francisco and New York where having one would be impractical.
So they go out and they find people like that, and then they report on them as representing the entire generation.
Don't like cars.
Oh, and there was another don't like country clubs, don't like golf.
You never catch them doing anything like that.
They don't get into this elitist exclusionary stuff.
They engage in lifestyle activities that include and welcome everyone.
And I will just bet you that a lot of that is bogus and is rooted in the fact that they don't have any money.
Remember when the unemployment rate was really high being reported, honestly, how bad it was.
And what did the drive-bys tell us about it?
Why that it was wonderful news that being unemployed was maybe one of the greatest things that could have happened to people because it afforded people a chance to reconnect with their families.
They even came up with a name for it, fun employed.
And the implication was that the hip thing to do, if you lose your job, welcome it.
Embrace it, and realize the opportunity it presents to broaden your life and to deepen relationships with those closest to you, because now you have the time.
You have no excuse to avoid them.
Because you don't have a job you have to go to.
And I think, okay, you do a story like that when you can't find a job anyway, when the unemployment rate's sky high, then you fall for something like that.
But people haven't changed.
Most people would rather work, and most people want careers, and most people want to do well in their careers.
And they want to do financially well, they want to do uh well in in terms of acclaim.
And so that hasn't changed.
It's not gone out of style.
But the drive-by's try to tell us that all these traditional things that you and I aspire to are now considered unhip and uncool by the know it all and very way ahead of everything millennial generation.
And I think it's all predicated on a fact.
Millennials can't find a job, and they don't have any money, and they're vastly in debt.
And so they are making rationalizations and adjustments to explain their circumstances and trying to turn it into a positive, which is fine and dandy with me attitudinally.
But it's all bogus.
Like this, what this guy just said.
You know, my son's different.
He doesn't care about quantity.
He wants quality.
Is that new?
People wanting the best is new.
You're kidding me.
This is new.
Give me a break.
Don't tell me that you have fallen for this cockamamy line of BS.
Now, to the extent that I'm wrong, and let's say that these millennials, let's say as they grow older, they are going to continue eschewing wanting the best and all of the things associated with that.
Maybe it is that socialism has become their belief system because socialism leads to sharing, mandatory sharing, whether you like sharing or not.
And if they buy into this uh total equality business, I don't know.
▲
Export Selection