All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 13, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
August 13, 2015, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
As you know, ladies and gentlemen, I carefully peruse and examine the drive-by media.
Practically every waking hour.
It's amazing I'm still sane and well adjusted, upbeat and positive, but I do.
I do it, show prep, uh any number of other reasons, and I'll tell you something.
All of a sudden, there are dozens of stories, dozens of articles in the drive-by media about how all of these outsiders, Republican and Democrat, candidate outsiders, are doing well in the campaign.
And thus, stories about how the American voters are fed up with the political class, the political insiders and business as usual.
And the people in the drive-by media are concluding that this is why Trump and Carson and Fiorina are surging in the polls.
Now, to them, this is news.
That there is anger outside.
I I told you the other day, and I think it's as true then as it is today.
I think most in the media do not know who their audience is.
But they probably have a better handle on it than some of the so-called conservative media outlets in knowing who their audience is.
But the idea that there's anger out there, the idea that outsider candidates would do well is just now occurring to the drive-by media.
And by the way, I can believe that.
Some people might think that's all just a show and it's the latest uh script, the daily narrative, soap opera, they're going this.
I think there's some uh legitimacy to this.
I think look at where they live.
They live in New York and Washington, and they live in a bubble.
And where they live, things are good.
There's no economic downturn in Washington, D.C. And for the people we're talking about, there is no economic downturn in New York City.
Not for the people we're talking about, not for the people in the ruling class, the electrical, the uh elites, the uh whatever you would call them, the establishment.
I mean, things for them are fine.
And they're not impacted by immigration, illegal immigration.
They're not impacted by all of the plunging economy uh aspects of the economy.
They're not really uh all that impacted by Obamacare.
Things for them are pretty cool.
And as such, I have found it's part of human nature.
Most people think that other people are doing just as well as they are.
In one way or one sense of an, especially in their own cohort.
And I think it's genuine shock.
I I think that it's not just Trump.
It started out with Trump, which is the outsider and his campaign was succeeding because they think the Tea Party's odd balls anyway, and they think that the Tea Party and the conservative base is a bunch of freaks and kooks, but now they're looking at Bernie Sanders just leaping over Hillary Clinton like she's not even there.
And they're all of a sudden, and they're looking at Ben Carson coming out of nowhere and and uh Carly Fiorina after debate performances, after substantive debate performances.
These people are not buying a lot of media yet.
They're not out there buying their name recognition.
And I get drive-by's are a little shocked that there is this kind of anger.
Remember, in their world, Obama's one of the greatest presidents ever.
In their world, Obama is cool and hip and has vanquished all of their enemies.
And to the extent they understand the anti-immigration movement, they attach it to or chalk it up to kookism or racism or xenophobia or bigotry or what have you.
It's not legitimate to them.
The attitudes of people unhappy in America, they're not legitimate attitudes.
They're not not to be taken seriously, because they're they're fringe in these people's minds.
But now they're having a tough time explaining to themselves why all of these outsiders, in their view, by the way, Uh are beginning to climb in presidential polls when they think all these people are idiots.
They think these people are fringe characters, even Ben Carson, they think he's a fringe guy.
Hell, some on our side think that.
Some of the moderate rhinos on our side think some of these candidates are fringe.
I mean, that's the whole point.
They do not know their audience.
The media doesn't know their, I'm convinced the Republican Party didn't know who their real voters are.
And I think so many media outlets have no idea who their audience is, including if their audience is the American people.
Because I think, and I've said this before, the drive-by media basically its audience is other drive-bys.
You know, when Chuck Todd is hosting Meet the Press, and I don't mean to pick on Chuck Todd.
I mean, take it when Stepanopoulos is hosting whatever he hosts.
You think they're doing that show for the American people?
The information, the education here.
No, they're doing that for other drive-bys.
They're trying to score points with other drive-bys.
They're trying to make news or get close to the newsmakers.
They're pumping a company line.
But the idea they're actually serving an audience of viewers, I don't think even occurs to them.
Or if it does very little.
I think this explains how CNN can sit there with no audience and just keep on trucking and not make a single change in what they're doing.
Or they're beginning to, by the way, with some uh analysts of the conservative bent who are being uh being hired.
Now, when it all started, they thought it was Trump.
They thought Trump was an outlier.
Trump was they came up with every kind of explanation except substance to explain Trump to themselves.
And then they tried insulting Trump's supporters as a bunch of kooks and crazies and idiots and so forth.
And then Trump does things that they think should end the candidacy of anybody and would have ended the candidacy of practically everybody else, but Trump survives it and they're mystified.
They don't get it, they don't understand it.
Trump should have been gone long ago, folks, in their world.
In their minds, he should have stepped in it, should have been gone after having stepped in it two or three times.
But whoever is responsible for this, it still is quite an achievement that the drive-by media.
I mean, there's all kinds of stories today.
Yours, Ron Fournier explaining Hillary's saga, is especially poignant today.
And I have all of these details to back these assertions coming up.
But it is it is fascinating here to me to see all of a sudden all of these stories about, and they're legitimate, by the way, they're not insulting American voters, and this is what's noteworthy about the voters being fed up with political insiders, fed up with business as usual.
Now, don't misunderstand.
This does not mean the drive-bys are going to all of a sudden be supportive and are going to abandon the elites and the ruling class.
And that's not what this means.
And I don't mean I'm not saying the media is coming around.
That's not my point here.
I don't think that's ever going to happen.
Not in our lifetimes and the current construct.
I'm just saying that they are finally seeing something that they think is substantive and real rather than a quirk of fate.
And they don't know what to do about it.
And they don't know how to deal with it.
And they're they're looking at how to kill it.
That hasn't changed.
And they can't figure out how to do it.
Because all these people, look them, the media didn't make Trump.
And the media didn't make Ben Carson.
And the media didn't make Carly Fiorina.
And the media, who else is doing it?
Cruise and the media.
I mean, the media, if anything, has tried to take these people out.
But I've always said when the media doesn't make you, the media can't destroy you.
But if you allow the media to make you, in other words, if you become a success or a highly recognized figure, if you have a lot of fame or what like Kardashians, simply because the media attention, they can take you out, too.
But they're not going to be able to take Trump out.
Trump's going to have to do that himself, one way or the other.
They can't do it.
And that frustrates them too.
They're used to being able to make people and break people.
And some of these outsiders say, you realize Ben Carson coming out of nowhere, just one debate performance, he's not buying a lot of media time.
He's showing up everywhere.
And this has them befuddled.
They don't understand how this is happening.
They don't think anybody can get anywhere without going through them, even if they have to uh to trick them.
Look at this from the Hill.com.
Outsiders take over, GOP, Washington Post.
It's not just Trump.
Voter anger fuels outsider candidates.
It's become a narrative.
Just like, do you remember last week or maybe it was two weeks ago, the stories on air conditioning.
And how air conditioning was sexist and unfair because the original inventors and designers who put it in office buildings did not factor in women working there.
They devised comfort systems based on male executives wearing coats and ties, in some cases vests.
And so women are shivering in there because of sexism.
How does that story become a story in the New York Times and in the Washington Post and on CBS, ABC, and B. It's a nothing story?
It's a Kakamami BS story.
How does it end up?
Well, there's a story here in the stack tracing how that happens in the drive-by media.
And so it's happening here with this theme of outsiders all of a sudden rising up.
And it's happening, as I say, throughout the drive-by media.
Washington Post article goes on to say the surging candidacies of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are fueled by people's anger with the status quo and desire for authenticity in political leaders.
Across the ideological spectrum, candidates are gaining traction by separating themselves from the political and economic system that many everyday Americans view is rigged against them, which is pretty close.
And what does it say about Obama?
Because these people on in the other day think everybody loves Obama.
I mean, they look at the polls and they see his disapprovals are around 50, but still they love Obama, they think everybody else loves Obama.
So for them it's a dilemma.
I mean, how can there be all this outsiderism and anger at the establishment when over here we've got beloved young king Barack Hussein Oh.
So I'm telling you, the drive-by's are conflicted.
But they are talking about this now, and they're doing it in ways above and beyond the fact that kookery is at play.
Now, do not misunderstand, this does not constitute the media seeing the light change.
It's just their latest narrative and reporting, but it is it is different in the sense that it's attributing this anger to substance rather than quackery kookery fringism or what have you.
Now look at me, ladies and gentlemen.
One moment, I, your host, am toast.
One moment, the news about me is that I'm hemorrhaging sponsors, hemorrhaging audience.
The talk radio itself is dead.
It's over.
I'm a has been.
And then the next day, like today, I am the single most powerful person running the media and influencing what Fox News does.
Every day, it's one story or version of that story or the other.
Today, what happened?
It was over on MSNBC, and Cookie, don't get mad at me because this was not.
I'm not she gets mad when I don't lift the embargo.
Cookie would love to be able to give me MSNBC bites because they're good liberal quackery, whatever, but I don't want them because I don't want to publicize them and promote them.
So I've got this ongoing ban, and I occasionally lift it.
But on um on the Scarborough show today, over there on PMSNBC, they had this guy from the New York Times named Nick Confessoray, or confessori, or confessor.
I don't know how he pronounces it.
He purposely mispronounced my name.
I'm trying to get his name right as C-O-N-F-E-S-S-O-R-E.
Confessore, confessor.
Anyway, this guy was asked a question by Mika Bzinski.
The question, who is the most powerful person in the media today?
And this guy at the New York Times said, well, I think Fox or Rush Limbaugh, although you pronounce a limbau.
That had to be on purpose.
These guys know this 27 years.
They have to know by now.
But he said it's a Fox or Rush Limbaugh, right?
In this primary, right?
I mean, there are two institutions that could have put a stop to Trump.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox.
And talk radio likes him.
And Fox backed down.
So this guy is saying it, I, your host, who one day am finished, it's over.
Sayonara, see you later.
Talk radio's dead, may as well forget about it.
Today, I am the most powerful guy in the media forcing Fox to back down on Trump.
And they believe it.
This guy's on MSNBC today saying it.
He believes it.
And there was a guy from the Huffing and Puffington Post named Sam Stein who seconded this point of view.
Mika Bzhinski told him that they're both wrong.
She said that Trump is the most powerful person in media.
But that's not what the question was.
The question who's the most powerful media person?
And Trump is not a media person, of course he's a builder and uh who knows whatever else.
And then over here on Fox and Friends Today, they're talking about Hillary's uh email server, Elizabeth Hasselbeck.
Here's the soundbite.
Rush Limbaugh has a theory as to why the president might actually be involved in this.
Peter's Obama, he's got two years.
In his mind, there's been no greater president.
Look at all the firsts.
Healthcare, tried it for 200 years, he got it.
Stop around getting a nuke.
I know it's not what happened.
That's the news, though.
He did it.
Got us out of a rock.
It's all lies, but that's the legacy.
The media will write it for him.
What if Hillary comes along and does an even better job?
He's not going to permit that chance to happen.
I said that uh, I think it was yesterday or the day before, in explaining the emails and this drip drip drip, and why in the world would a Democrat run Department of Justice go after Hillary?
We have people calling and asking me.
And I said, well, just what you heard there, I had a one other element to it.
It's Obama's legacy.
That's what he really cares about.
And he doesn't want to take the chance of a next Democrat president being considered even better than he was, nor does he want the next Democrat president unraveling his agenda or legacy.
And that's why I think he's gonna go Biden.
That's why he's gonna endorse Biden.
Biden's Mr. Loyal.
I can just hear the campaign now.
You want me to run third term, but I can't.
You know the best way to get me a third term, Joe Biden.
Meet my good friend, vice president, Joe Biden.
Yay!
And then it goes on from just imagine this, folks.
Let's say your Barack Hussein Obama, first African American president in history, and you, there is no way you want your historicity.
My word.
Your history or story, your historicity.
You don't want that undermined.
You don't want this great legacy.
I mean, Obama thinks all these things he's done are once in a generation or multiple generations, and nobody ever got health care till he did it.
Nobody ever was able to sit down and talk to the Iranians and get them to not make a nuke like he did.
I mean, none of this is true.
That doesn't matter.
This the legacy, this is what the media is going to write about of him.
Nobody ever saved us from going into a Great Depression like Obama did with his great economic recovery.
You know, all of this garbage stuff in his legacy is going to be a history of firsts and never before accomplished items that only he could have done.
Do you think a guy like that who cares about things like that is gonna want all of that unwound?
Or worse, In their perverted view, improved on by, say, the first woman president, who already has the reputation of smartest woman in the world.
You think he wants that?
No way.
He doesn't even want to risk that.
You think he wants the next Democrat president to come along, be an Hispanic, and either outdo his great accomplishments or unravel them or make mistakes that show how Obama's accomplishments were actually giant failures.
He doesn't want to put any of this at risk.
Particularly when you talk about the Clintons, which the Obama's in the Clintons, I don't care what you say, there's a lot of friction there.
You're going to want your record for the purpose of your historicity to stand for a while.
And that's why I really think that is a good possibility Biden's got to get it made to order on uh on so many levels.
May not happen, but I'm just telling you, I won't be surprised if it does.
Further news on the Democrat panic over Hillary coming up.
The saga continues.
Ill Rushbo, the all-knowing, all caring, all sensing, all feeling all concerned, maha Rushi.
All right, now there's another element to this, terms of Obama's legacy.
Oh, you know what I just saw?
You know what?
You know what they're doing up on uh on Fox right now?
They're doing a story on all of the drive-by stories on outsiders.
See how this works.
So they get something started, and everybody's gonna be talking about you heard it here first, but I'm not.
I was alerting you to it rather than falling for it.
Premise.
Anyway.
Obama's got his legacy, and it's made out of Swiss cheese.
It's made out of balsa wood.
It's constructed out of things, of things which aren't true.
Obamacare is a disaster.
His immigration policy is destroying so much of this country, as is Obamacare.
The cultural rot that he has presided over is literally perverting our culture.
But in his world, these are first-time achievements that nobody been able to do.
National health care, sitting down with the Iranian mullas and getting them to promise not to do nukes and all that.
Here's the thing, though.
It wouldn't take much at all on the part of the next president to improve on this.
That's how bad things really are.
Now, I don't know.
I'm I'm not a narcissist.
So I don't know if Obama has the capacity to understand that he is this imaginary greatest president ever, on top of a bunch of phony baloney plastic banana good time rock and roller achievements.
I don't know if he knows that all this is just a bunch of media fraud and creation.
I don't know if he knows that this is really no great shakes or if he really does believe it is.
Either way, in the real world, it wouldn't take much to do better than what we're doing right now.
And it wouldn't take a whole lot of different policy adjustments to effect an immediate improvement in the lives of millions of people.
Integration alone, do the right thing there.
And we have already put the brakes on big time, then repeal Obamacare and go about reconstructing it and getting us back to the best health care system and best medical RD in the world.
Wouldn't take much to put the brakes on the devastating effects of Obamacare.
And in the process, illustrate just how bad these seven years have been.
It's so bad the American people, particularly millennials, have been told this is the new normal.
You must readjust your expectations.
This country's past was phony.
We didn't deserve all that superpower status, and we certainly didn't deserve all of that great economic power for all of those years because that came about as the result of our stealing it from other nations around the world.
This is the common held belief of the American left today.
United States was a phony superpower, an undeserving superpower, an illegitimate superpower, and we're an illegitimate country because of our founding and so forth.
So now Obama's fixing everything.
He's making amends and making corrections for all the mistakes made from the founding.
And as a result, young people are told this is your life.
You've got to lower your expectations.
The sharing economy is where it's all at.
Forget owning anything.
That's not cool, and that's that's selfish, because not everybody can own a house.
It's better if nobody does, and everybody shares in rents, and they're buying into it or have.
Wouldn't take very many tweaks to the tax code and a couple of other economic policies.
Get rid of some of these punitive regulations of the EPA, and we'd turn this economy around on a dime.
But point is it would be noticeable very quickly.
That's how bad things are.
You think Obama wants to see somebody elected president's gonna do things like I just described?
No way.
So it's a long roundabout way of saying I think it's entirely possible that this investigation of Hillary Clinton is inspired at the top of the Obama administration, and whether it is a direct assault on her with a full-fledged investigation or whether it's nothing more than this continual drip, drip, drip.
Every day we learn a little bit more.
That makes Hillary look a little more guilty every day.
Little more added to it makes Hillary even more suspected.
Makes even more people doubt her, drip, drip, drip, slow little water torture here.
It's one of the two.
Either that's going to continue or there's a full-fledged investigation going on with who knows what's going to happen afterwards.
What I know is that the power brokers in parts of the Democrat Party and the media are in a state of crisis over it.
They are in a straight state of crisis particularly over Hillary.
Remember now, none of this was supposed to happen.
This was gonna be 2008 done right.
This was going to be her coronation.
It was going to be in 2008, too, but something came along, Barack Obama.
And what we've learned, 2008, 2015, when people in the Democrat Party have a choice, they take it.
Mrs. Clinton is not universally loved.
She is not universally respected.
She is not universally feared, and she is not considered automatic.
Two election cycles in a row.
Hence, just like I said yesterday, too, Democrat Party's the party of the young, right?
Supposedly party of hip and cool, a party of hip-hop, a party of pop culture, a party of uh all the neatest latest uh cultural things to do.
They're not at all old-fashioned.
Oh no, they're not at all out of Jurassic Park.
Democrat Party's where it's at, the Democrat Party, not stuck in the past.
And yet you look at the two leaders in their campaign, and their combined age is 180.
Or close to it.
There is no youth in the Democrat presidential campaign.
There's no cool in the Democrat presidential campaign.
There's no hip.
There certainly isn't any youth and not any ties to it.
So one of these never-ending images of the Democrat Party as the party of progressivism.
Enlightenment.
Cool hip.
Well, it's not represented here by the two people running for president.
They're the last thing that you would associate with any of that.
It matters.
Over on Morning Joe Today, back to MSNBC, had nice and real clear politics, morning Joe panel in state of crisis over Clinton email server spin.
That's really all you need to know.
The server's blank.
There's nothing on it.
So now they're worried about obstruction of justice.
There's nothing on the server.
How did that happen?
Only one way that can happen.
Hillary did it.
Or whoever's working for her.
Now they're worried.
Oh my God, that's obstruction of justice.
They can't believe why she didn't turn the server over months ago.
She can't they can't.
Why can't they believe we're talking about the Clintons for crying?
When's the last time they ever cooperated with law enforcement on anything?
Her husband even lied under oath in his testimony on this.
I don't know, whatever it was.
And he condoned perjury on the part of others.
They really, they're asking himself, why didn't she just turn the server over?
Why didn't she just turn the server over because of what was on it?
That's why she didn't.
Anyway, they're now worried about obstruction of justice.
The Hill.com, Democrats near Clinton panic mode.
Now this thing prints out the three pages.
And we've highlighted here in red all of the words that convey the sense of panic that the Democrat Party is in.
Democrats are worried that the furor over Hillary's email server will be prolonged.
The campaign's decision to give up the server and a thumb drive containing backup copies of emails left Democrats scratching their heads as to why Hillary resisted turning it over for months.
Really?
They can't figure out why she wouldn't turn it over.
She's lied about what's on it.
Are you kidding me?
If there are ten emails about yoga on this thing, I would be surprised.
What are we going to have?
IPhone screenshots of Hillary in various yoga positions with some yoga instructor emailing her back on the right and wrong of it.
And then emails of the wedding and Hillary or Chelsea's uh wherever she was registered at home depot, whatever it was.
Scratching, it's like the morning Joe crew.
Why didn't she turn the server over my gut?
Now that it's empty, they're worried about obstruction of justice.
Coupled with new polls that suggested Clinton is vulnerable.
Democrats are nearing full-on panic mode.
Now I know what some of you are screaming at me right now.
I know this because I have empathy.
I do know my audience.
And I know some of you out there are shouting, rush, rush, rush, rush, rush, don't forget.
I know you think that all of this is a giant ruse from which she will magically recover and triumph and be pronounced clean as a whistle, and once again will have outsmarted everyone, and we will be down in the dumps and depressed over how the Clintons have escaped again.
I know that many people think that's what's going on.
We've been sandbagged.
That we're being led down this path of belief that Hillary, they're really going to get her to stay really going to get a Clinton.
But it's all a setup.
She's going to survive every single time.
The only argument against that is that that's not in Obama's best interest.
And all of this is happening.
If that theory is what's going on, all this is a game, all of this is a head fake and a scam designed to ultimately depress us.
That means Obama would have to be in on it.
And I don't think Hillary has a juice to be able to tell the Obama administration to execute a plan that she has.
And I don't see him being complicit with her.
Time will tell.
But the stories are all over the place about the panic and fear in the media and in the party over Hillary and the server are plummeting numbers in the polls.
They don't understand it.
And they're really, really worried.
And I think it's really, really real.
Now this story is uh I'm not even off the first page yet.
The story of the Hill dot com.
Democrats near Clinton panic mode.
I think there's something else, folks, that argues that this is real.
They don't have anybody on a bench.
I mean the idea that this was Hillary's turn and it was a coronation.
There's nobody in the bench.
And I know Malley, no name recognition to speak of.
Bernie Sanders, I mean, when he announced he was going to do this, it was a giant laugh session.
Bernie Sanders is not the bench.
they don't have a bench.
They don't have anybody in the wings if something unexpected happened to Hillary.
This was it.
And now I think the panic is legitimate.
This is another bunch of people that do not, they don't even know their candidate, much less their audience.
They've got to be living in a dream world after 2008 if they thought it was going to be smooth sailing.
But with the success they've had with Obama, they've won it every turn.
They have hoodwinked and snookered their opposition every inch of the way.
Who can blame them for thinking it was going to be easy to keep doing that?
Here's just some of the phrases in this story.
Slew of unimpressive poll numbers, losing swing states, continuing weakness, general suspicion, much more damaging, losing the ground she lost on trustworthiness and honesty, getting the worst of hypothetical matchups.
Voter skepticism about Clinton personally.
52% of Iowans holding an unfavorable view of Clinton.
They're ignoring what the inspector general said, which is that there was not one single accusation of wrongdoing alleged against Hillary and her use of email.
The first fact that listed was that none of the emails sent to Clinton were labeled as classified or top secret.
Why did the Clinton campaign not simply hand over the private server when the controversy first erupted?
She hadn't been able to find anybody to degouse the thing, folks.
She had to go out and find somebody to erase that thing who would keep quiet about having done it.
Opening herself up for blackmail down the road.
Somebody had to wipe that server.
Now it could have been the rate array, always get rid of the data on one server and the other servers in the array take care of it, as a caller said yesterday.
But if you're going to wipe it, you're going to go to somebody who knows how to really wipe it, not just reformat it, but totally wipe that thing.
Get rid of every directory and every bite on that drive.
And that means a giant electromagnet like odd job used in Goldfinger to crush the car.
And then whoever you get to do that, you're going to have to swear them to secrecy under threat of what?
And I contend it took a while for Mrs. Clinton to do all that.
That's why she didn't turn the server over, because otherwise, it would have been confirmed, what everybody suspects now was on it.
To the phones we go, Nick, Naples, Florida.
Hey, Nick, great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
How are you doing?
I'm fine.
Thank you much.
I uh wanted to comment on that uh what you were talking about earlier, that article that's talking about all of these uh outsider candidates who are doing so well.
And I kind of come on piggyback on what uh someone called yesterday about a millennial who was talking about why he likes Trump.
It seems to me that these people who are doing so well, I mean it's it's not just that they're outsiders, it's that they're standing on principles.
They're not just you know saying what they think independence want to hear.
They're not saying what the media is telling that telling them that independence won't hear.
They're saying what they honestly believe, and they come off as very solid and exhibiting these leadership qualities.
I like your thinking on this, Nick, that they're not outsiders, they just happen to be genuine.
And the genuineness is such a stark standout from the norm that it's attracting people.
That they're not, you know, that's an excellent point, because this whole term outsiders, what does it mean?
It means fringe, in one sense, could mean kook in another.
An outsider, well, that's somebody who wants in.
And why do they want in?
Because what's inside is what's it, what's hip, what's cool.
So just the term outsider can be used with the implication that they're kooky or fringy.
So Nick, this is an excellent point.
He says it's just to rephrase what he said, they're not attracting attention and rising in the polls because they're outside the system per se.
They're outside the system because they are genuine and real and principled and substantive, which in and of itself is attractive.
Not just that they're outsiders.
Excellent point back after this.
Don't go away.
No, no, no, no.
Now don't anybody misunderstand.
I Just checked the email during the break.
I'm not saying Hillary is finished.
All I'm saying is the Democrats didn't plan on being here.
They undoubtedly have a plan.
Don't forget, folks, they have the drive-by media at their disposal here.
But uh it's just clear that they're not in familiar territory here, and they're in panic mode, and there is some mainstream Democrat fallout and fall away from Hillary taking place.
▲
Export Selection