All Episodes
Previous Next
July 6, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:10
July 6, 2015, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Right here, right here, don't sweat it, folks.
We are right here with yet another busy broadcast hour straight ahead on the Rush Limbaugh program at the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Telephone numbers 800 282-2882, minor correction, the opening lyric line and honky tonk women is I met a gin soaked barroom queen in Memphis.
You can't understand it.
I guarantee you listen to the song.
You can't understand what McJagger is saying, but that's why I've always been curious what it is.
And that's it.
I saw this last week and I've been trying to remember, so I've just looked it up here.
Met a gin-soaked barber of Queen of Memphis.
I had slightly wrong in my pronounce it of what it was just moments ago.
Um ladies and gentlemen, uh Breitbart.
Uh article from from Breitbart.
On July 3rd, exclusive four-time deported illegal immigrant murdered wife with hammer in Texas.
So the thing in San Francisco's not a one off.
And everybody now trying to say, hey, let's not join Trump in the hey, hey, hey, it would be terribly unfortunate to try to tar and feather an entire ethnicity over this.
When that's exactly what the left does.
Sandy Hook, school shooting, Columbine, Aurora, Colorado, Gabby Gifford's, every damned one of them.
Every one of these mass shootings or deaths or even natural disasters somehow are blamed on Republicans or Republican policies.
And now it's even gotten more specific.
Now the white race is being specifically blamed for all of these societal ills.
And the white race is being used as the justification for all the crime being committed by minorities and victims and what have you.
Now from the Breitbart article.
Breitbart, Texas, has exclusively confirmed that a man who confessed to murdering his wife with a hammer in Laredo is a four-time deported illegal immigrant who would not have been in the U.S. had he not been able to illegally cross back into the country many times from Meiko after his deportation.
The article goes on to say that the Laredo cops knew about the guy and his violence towards his wife, but they they wouldn't do anything about it, let alone turn him over to ICE because they didn't want to lose the trust of the local Hispanic community, which is mostly illegals.
Now stop and think of that.
The local police did not want to turn the PERP over they didn't want to lose the trust of the local Hispanic community.
I don't think the word trust, they that might be what they say, but trust is not what they're worried about here.
They didn't want a mob uprising.
It's no different that's what's happening with speech.
You can't say the truthful thing in many cases because it'll create mob hysteria.
And so you shut up or you utter some politically correct nonsense to placate the would-be mob.
I mean, this is classic bullying.
But when the cops admit to being bullied, or when the cops admit to their culpable in being bullied, good grief.
And you got Mrs. Clinton in 2007 saying, well, this is really bad in San Francisco because if the local law enforcement begins doing the job of ICE, immigration officers, the only reason they would have to is if I isn't doing its job.
I'll tell you, things are so out of whack.
This it's it's difficult to understand.
People who engage in criminal behavior, either to a little bit or a large extent, are somehow protected and shielded because we don't want to offend them.
Remember the days we used to make jokes about the um the left would always say it's risky.
It's risky to call the Soviets communists, it's risky because it might make them really mad.
It's risky to tell the truth about it, it might make them really mad, and they might leave the start talks, or they might nuke somebody, or what have you.
Well, look at what that's become now.
We better not anger that mob there of illegals, otherwise we won't be able to control them.
So we'll let some guy who beats his wife up continue to do so because we don't want to lose the trust of the Hispanic community in this town.
And in right on cue, here comes Paul, but grab Sonbite Seven again.
This is from just this morning on CNN, and he's asked Does this incident in San Francisco kind of not give Trump some credibility on this?
Well, I'm sure he will seize it even if it doesn't give it to him.
Mr. Trump is not shy about sharing his views.
First off, good manners and any human decency requires that we that I uh offer my sympathies to the Steinley family.
It's a horrendous murder.
Republicans and Democrats ought to join and not allow Mr. Trump to get away with using this murder in San Francisco to smear an entire ethnicity.
You know, nobody used the South Carolina shooting to smear white people.
Oh man, is this see that's not so that's so not true.
They tried.
They had every plan in the world.
They still are trashing the entire Southern culture because they're going after this the Confederate flag, and they're telling us the Confederate flag stands for all these horrible rotten things, and they are smearing, tarring and feather, impugning an entire region of the country.
And it's not new.
Left has been tarring and feathering and impugning, criticizing the South for who knows how long.
Racist, Hayseed, pro-life hicks, pickup trucks, gun racks in the back, you know the drill.
But of course, Democrats never ever do this, right?
No, not after Sandy Hook, they didn't do it, not after Columbine, not after Aurora, the movie theater shooting, not after Gabby Gifford.
No, no, no.
The good Democrats, they never looked to anything other than the true perpetrator.
What a crock.
At every major crime that gains national attention.
The Democrat Party and the American left do everything they can to blame it on Republicans, conservatives, and white people and mass.
So Bogala is essentially saying here.
It it it it just we we should we should not allow this to smear an entire ethnicity.
We should we should not do what we do.
The Republicans ought not get away with doing what we do every time one of these events happens.
Republicans and Democrats ought to join together to make sure that what we do doesn't happen in this case because one of the guys we believe in is to blame.
I mean, they are the champions of illegal immigrants, are they not?
Who is it that has the justification of explaining this?
Who is it should have to speak up for this guy?
Who is it that should have to explain themselves that this guy's in the country?
Why should Trump have to explain himself on this?
Why should any Republican have to explain himself?
Why is it not that the Democrats and Hillary Clinton and whoever else, they're the ones, the city of San Francisco.
Why do they not have to justify their policies?
Why do they not have to apologize?
Why did they not have to explain their thinking and their behavior and permitting this kind of thing happening?
It's all out of whack.
It's all 180 degrees out of phase.
Here's Trump.
This is from uh Saturday morning, Fox and Friends.
Clayton Morris said, what do you say to the critics that Trump is running for president just to embolden his own brand?
The people that say I'm doing it from my brand.
This isn't good for my brand.
I think it's bad for my brand.
I lose customers, I lose people.
I give up hundreds of millions of dollars of deals where I'm doing this, and then you hear about a NASCAR, and you hear about an NBC, and you hear about, you know, different people that drop Trump because Trump wants safety in the United States.
I mean, if you think of it, what am I doing?
I say, let's make our country safe.
And people are offended.
It's incredible.
Well, the way people are mischaracterizing what Trump is saying.
So they're not granting him the contention that he's trying to make the country safe.
They're trying to peg him as a racist bigot who has an animus toward Mexican and Latin people.
They're not going to grant him this notion that he's trying to keep the country safe.
They're going to brand him a bigot because that's how they think they can get rid of him.
You look at what's happening to Trump.
NBC waves goodbye.
Macy's waves goodbye.
Um, I imagine some others, and he's hanging in there.
If I'm not mistaken, what Trump is doing, the way he's hanging in, the way he is not being bullied out of this.
Well, this is what I keep hearing when I travel around, people tell me what the Republican Party needs is, and they start telling me what characteristics they want.
We need somebody who's not gonna cut and run.
We need somebody who's gonna fight, we need somebody who's gonna stand up for us, we need somebody who's gonna tell the truth.
Well, here you go.
Trump is not being forced out.
And everybody that's in business with Trump, or a lot of people are trying to pull out and embarrass him and humiliate him and and uh harm him financially, and he's still not backing out.
And he's not making the obligatory trip to the microphones with the tail between his legs and apologizing and saying, please forgive me.
That really wasn't who I am.
I didn't know what I was digging.
I love Mexicans.
He's not doing that.
That's what they want him to do.
So here's a guy, antithetical to your average ordinary Republican of the day.
Moving on to the audio soundbite's unidentified reporter on CNN's newsroom.
They played a clip of a female reporter talking to Mitt Mitt Romney about Trump and the comments he has made.
It's about 11 seconds goes by pretty quickly.
Do you think Donald Trump's comments on Mexicans have hurt the Republican Party?
Yes, I think he made a uh severe error in saying what he did about Mexican Americans uh and uh feel it was unfortunate.
A severe error.
Where if we heard that.
He made a severe error, Mitt Romney says.
Let's go back to 2012, February 10th, it was at the Gopac conference conference.
I fought against law and odds in a deep blue state, but I was a severely conservative Republican governor.
Oh, yeah!
That's where I heard that.
I was a severe conservative Republican governor.
Saturday in Merrimack, New Hampshire campaign event, Jeb Bush speaking with reporters about Trump's campaign.
He's doing this to inflame and to incite and to draw attention, which is seems to be his organizing principle of his campaign.
And um he doesn't represent the Republican Party or its values.
He doesn't represent the Republican Party or its values.
Sunday morning, Fox News Sunday, the all-star Brainiac panel, fill in host Shannon Bream speaking with George Will about Trump.
She said, Jeb Bush went on to say that uh he took what Trump's doing and saying personally, because Jeb Bush's wife is from Mexico.
If Donald Trump were a Democratic mole placed in the Republican Party to disrupt things, how would his behavior be different?
I don't think it would be.
Uh there's all listeners talk, but it's something to it about the Republican brand.
Picture him on stage in Cleveland.
He says something hideously inflammatory.
The debate gets hijacked, the process gets hijacked, and at the end of the day, he is a one-man Todd Aitkin.
There it is.
There it is.
George Will says that Donald Trump is Todd Aiken.
Says something inflammatory, gets up there on stage, hijacking.
I have heard that theory, by the way.
You know, I've got people that have pointed out to me, he said, Rush, have you seen all the money Trump gives to Democrats?
He's seen the money he's donated to the Democrats and Hillary and Chuck Schumer and all these New York Democrats.
I see, yeah, I've seen it.
Well, what if what if Trump's just doing this just to totally destroy the Republican Party?
What if he's going out there?
What if what if he's gonna be made whole by the Democrats when this is all over?
He's gonna get all his money back, he's gonna get his relationship with Macy's back, NBC's gonna rehire him to do the apprentice, all this he's gonna be compensated for in exchange for taking out the Republican Party.
I've heard that theory bandied about.
A lot of establishment Republicans believe that that's what's happening.
They do.
And I guess you have to add George Will to the uh to the mix.
Piling on, here's Michael Steele, the former chairman, Republican National Committee on Meet the Press.
Chuck Todd said, boy, it's a tough call for uh for Rhein's prebus.
I mean, I don't envy him here.
On one hand, he wants to play referee, you know, inside he'd love to totally denounce Trump, but they don't want to alienate part of the party.
What would you be doing here, Michael?
You've got to have that sister soldier moment with the party where you've got to be honest and call it what it is.
People are sophisticated enough to know when you're just full of BS.
Everyone in the country reacted to this, and you didn't.
The party didn't, and those who want to be president didn't until what this week.
That's a problem.
It's a problem of authenticity, it's a problem of legitimacy when you're going to go speak to that community.
Here's Ted Cruz, also on Meet the Press.
Um Chuck Todd says Donald Trump, you've defended him.
Your former Governor Rick Perry is ripped into him.
You've had experience with plenty of Mexican immigrants in Texas.
Are these immigrants that are coming in Texas what Donald Trump describes?
Are they drug dealers, rapists and such?
I like Donald Trump.
He's bold, he's brash, and I get that it seems the favorite sport of the Washington media is to encourage some Republicans to attack other Republicans.
I ain't gonna do it.
I'm not interested in Republican on Republican violence.
I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal immigration.
The Washington cartel doesn't want to address that.
Well now, what do you think of that?
Is that not somewhat a reasonable reaction to this?
I mean, Trump is running as a Republican.
It is clear that the base of the Republican Party is opposed to amnesty.
Trump is the only guy that appears to be opposed to it.
Well, uh Cruz is, obviously.
I like Trump.
He's bold, he's brash, I get it.
Some people want Republicans to destroy him, but I'm not going to.
I'm not interested in that kind of crime.
I salute Trump for focusing on the need to do something about illegal immigration.
And Trump against, hey, I don't get it.
I'm just trying to keep the country safe.
Why am I the bad guy?
Here's uh here's Governor Christie, also on Fox News Sunday.
Question.
Uh you you made some comments out there about uh people building walls and so forth, and uh uh you kind of made fun of it.
Is that a jab at Trump?
And secondly, what is your plan for the border?
It's not a jab at just the Donald Trump.
There's been lots of people who have talked about, as you know, over time, building a wall across the entire southern border.
I think it's the wrong message.
And by the way, I know the human spirit.
I haven't found a wall that can be built that uh determines human being can get over, under, or around.
Gotta take a break here, folks, back in just a second.
Let me head to the phones.
Uh, Manhattan, Kansas, this is Alan.
I'm glad you waited.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Uh I called it Man, I've listened to your show for years.
But how does an eight-year-old boy answer that question?
How does he even know if he's gay or not?
My equipment didn't start working until I was twelve.
I couldn't have answered anything like that.
Uh I have look, um I uh um Yeah.
I don't I don't know.
I I haven't heard testimony on well, no, I take it back.
Wait a second, wait a second.
Wasn't it didn't Bruce Jenner say when he was five he knew?
Or didn't somebody, maybe not didn't somebody recently say when they were five?
When they were five, they knew they either were a woman or they felt like trapped in a woman's body, or they knew they were gay or something.
I look, the the uh Alan I I I think the uh the gay political left will tell you it's entirely understandable.
An eight-year-old would know this.
That what what look at what we're being asked to believe.
A kid sitting on the front stoop on the Fourth of July crying about this, and a news photographer just happens to be walking by, just happens to take a picture, just happens to ask the kid, the kid just happens to tell the truth, and the first person to hear about is Hillary, so that she can reply to it.
Really?
As usual, ladies and gentlemen, I was correctamente.
It was Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner, it was on TMZ.
I knew I was a woman since age five.
Bruce Jenner recently opened up to his family, a little Spanish lingo there, uh, that he has known since the age of five that he was a female.
So, could the eight-year-old kid on the stump know.
Here, look, if you want to take it, if you want to do this, eight-year-old kid on a stump crying because he's gay and he's worried that he's gonna be unhappy and made fun of, or whatever, the rest of his life.
Okay, eight years old.
Why do you have to who who told him this?
Where did he pick that up?
Is that not awfully convenient for the and don't forget now, everything on the left is politics.
Everything is politics.
Everything is about advancing a leftist political agenda, and that clearly does.
I mean, that fits exactly what meme or narrative the left wants people to believe, even now, when homosexuality is in the middle of a mass acceptance, still want you to believe that it's a horrible, terrible burden because of the prejudice and bigotry of mainstream society.
So an eight-year-old kid on the stump front of his house, all alone crying about this.
Well, who where do you pick this up?
He's eight years old.
How does he know at eight that his life is already pre-programmed to be filled with misery because he's gay.
And then, of course, the happenstance of the photographer.
And then the happenstance that the kid opens up to the photographer about why he's crying, and then the happenstance that Hillary just happens to see it because it just happened to go viral.
I mean, there's a lot of coincidences here, and all I know is that there are no coincidences with the Clintons.
Here's Richard in Northern Michigan as we stay with the phones.
Great to have you, sir.
Hi.
Hi, Russ.
It's an honor to be able to speak to one of my heroes.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate that.
I was calling about uh Mr. Sulu's lame apology, and that how it was all about him, and it didn't address his racist comment.
And I notice a pattern here.
Anytime the left wingers step in it, they have to go out and revirgnize themselves without actually admitting that they could be like a racist because they're the victim.
Well, let us restate what happened here.
For people that might not have heard and don't know what you're talking about.
Uh George Takai is better known as Mr. Sulu.
He was on Star Trek.
And because of that, he's a nice guy.
George DeCai is presumed and automatically is a nice guy.
And Republicans are mean.
Okay.
So that's the starting point.
George Decay's a nice guy.
Nobody knows him.
He's not done diddly squats in Star Trek except political act, but he's a nice guy.
Because he was on Star Trek C, and he was Mr. Sulu on Star Trek.
Star Trek is a cult sci-fi favorite, and therefore he's a nice guy.
And so he read or thought he read or heard about parts of Clarence Thomas's descent in the what case was it?
Was it the gay marriage case?
I guess it was a gay marriage.
Well, anyway, Clarence Thomas wrote about slavery and dignity.
And George DeKai would ripped him on this program because it it's it's one of two things had to happen.
He either purposely misunderstood what Thomas wrote and just went on a tirade in order to get a little fame time, or he really does not have the depth of culture and civilization to understand what Clarence Thomas was saying.
And what Clarence Thomas basically wrote was that just because slaves were enslaved, they did not lose their dignity, that the government that slavery did not take away their dignity.
And that offended George DeKay out the wazoo, and he said, Clarence Thomas is a clown in blackface.
Clarence Thomas needs to be taken off Supreme Court.
Are you telling me that having your back chained every day is dignity?
He wouldn't know dignity if he looked him in the face.
And Clarence Thomas did not say any of that.
And so to Kai, apparently he when was this?
Richard, was it the next day he came out and he apologized?
Yep.
But the one thing that he didn't apologize for was the racism in his rant against Clarence Thomas.
And it was totally racist.
He said, I'm not a racist.
I just I I lost myself for a while.
I got so upset because I feel so passionately about this that I just said some things that were probably not uh right or they were inopportune or what have you, but he did not he did a version of that wasn't me.
That's not the real me.
And I but he did not apologize for the racist content of his remarks, such as Clarence Thomas is a clown in blackface.
And George Takai may be a nice guy, but he couldn't wear Clarence Thomas's robe.
He couldn't wear Clarence Thomas's jock strap.
In fact, I got George uh Richard, I'm gonna tell you something fascinating.
Well, to me it's fascinating.
I guess it was Saturday or Sunday morning.
I had I got a I got a note.
Um and it basically said, Thank you for defending Justice Thomas again.
And it said, isn't it fascinating, Rush?
You have been defending Clarence Thomas for 26 years, and you still have to.
You have been defending Clarence Thomas and others, but him specifically for 26 years, and it's still necessary to do it.
And I took from that the point being we're not gaining any ground here.
And then when you stop and remember that HBO is producing a movie, you know, the young millennials, all they know about the Thomas Anita Hill hearings are what they've been taught.
But they have to be shown.
So HBO's producing a movie right now about the Thomas Anita Hill hearing starring the beautiful Carrie Washington as Anita Hill and Wendell Pierce will be made up to be dumpy and frumpy as Clarence Thomas.
And it's time now to show the millennials what happened.
They never let up.
They realize they've got a whole generation here, does not real none understand what happened.
It's time to poison their minds.
So that's coming up too.
And it's going to inspire more defense of Clarence Thomas.
And nothing changes.
Twenty-six years still had to defend every one of these guys.
Because then the the point is, Richard, the assaults never stop.
They just keep coming.
All we have time to do here is play defense.
I didn't know that.
That that movie was coming out.
And that's really sad because the high-tech lynchings just never stop.
Nope, that's that they do not.
They just continue.
And the reason they do is because Clarence Thomas, the left will never be permitted to know of his genuine brilliance.
They'll never be permitted to know the truth of his character and his stellar interpretation and understanding of the law.
He represents as the most powerful black man in America.
He's a Supreme Court justice.
That's why the attacks are never ending.
And that's why they hate his guts, is because of the threat that he poses.
So he is under constant assault, being defamed and impugned.
Yeah, this movie's going to come out before the election.
It'll be perfectly timed.
I don't know how soon before the election, but it's in production right now.
And you can imagine it's an HBO movie.
You know what they did to the Sarah Palin story.
You can imagine what they're going to do to this.
Well, I'm glad they called today because I didn't know that about the HBO movie.
Yeah, I forget the title of it, but uh, yeah, that's it's there's there's been a lot of pre-publicity about it.
And look at Anita Hill.
Uh well, I'm just I don't excuse me, folks.
I just don't see her when I see Carrie Washington.
That's all.
The title of the HBO movie about the confirmation hearings, Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill is confirmation.
That is the title.
Greg Kinnear is going to play Joe Biden, who ran the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time.
The Democrats uh ran the Senate, so Biden was the committee chairman.
Uh, and he was despicable.
Biden was despicable.
Paul Simon, people have forgotten.
In fact, I probably know more about that than most people are.
I've probably forgotten more than most people know.
It was Paul Simon's wife that actually got this whole pubic hair on a on a on a cocaine going.
It was Paul Simon's wife, a senator from Illinois who went to Anita Hill and basically convinced her to be used in in this manner to go after and get Clarence Thomas.
It was it was the Clarence Thomas Anita Hill hearings which gave birth to the prominence of the liberal philosophy.
The nature of the evidence doesn't matter.
It's the seriousness of the charge.
When nobody could produce evidence of what Anita Hill was saying, and she had never said it before.
She had never leveled the allegation during all of Justice Thomas's prior confirmation hearings to be on the federal bench.
He was hired by Ashcroft when he was uh attorney general in St. Louis.
He worked for him there too.
And during none of those hiring periods did Anita Hill ever show up and try to warn anybody, but Clarence Thomas was a pervert.
A sexual harasser is not until the Supreme Court came up.
And they couldn't produce any evidence other than she said that, yeah, there was uh he liked long John Dong Silver, whatever it was, and a pubic hair and a cocon.
And that's when the left said, we're talking about the Supreme Court.
The seriousness of the charge, vastly more important than the nature of the evidence here.
This is a serious charge.
Do we want somebody sitting in the Supreme Court who has been so seriously charged, has such serious allegations.
Well, you don't have any evidence, it doesn't matter.
The seriousness of it, that's where that philosophy was given birth.
I'll tell you, I want to play a role in that movie.
I want to be Judge Susan Hirschner.
She was a witness for Anita Hill.
She was one of the one of the one of the uh many character witnesses.
And oh, people forgot Anita Hill followed Clarence Thomas everywhere he went.
From job to job to job, there she was.
And she even converted that.
Well, yes, I was so I was under a spell, you know.
And it just, but he was bullying me, and it was also, but she was, you know, Clarence Thomas felt that she might have been a semi-groupie.
She was following him everywhere, and all of a sudden, out of the blue, and by the way, not at the beginning of the hearings.
It took a little while to get into.
I remember when it really broke, I was in Oklahoma City on a stop on the Rush to Excellence Tour, and I had to broom everything I was gonna do in my performance that night, and I devoted a whole thing to this because it made me sick.
The whole thing literally made me sick, angry and sick, at what they were doing.
And I should have seen it, I should have seen it at the time.
Stuff that should have been automatically rejected by a clear majority of the country wasn't.
Majority of Americans, well, they did believe Clarence Thomas.
He ended up getting confirmed, but look at what it look, Arlen Spector was the savior for Clarence Thomas in these hearings.
And he ended up later in life talking about how he regretted.
He really went after Anita Hill.
He really and some of her witnesses.
But this Judge Hirchner, maybe we have a picture of her, we could post up there at Rushlimbaugh.com.
Let me imagine, you know Peter Paul and Mary.
Okay, imagine Mary Travers at age 80, with the hairstyle of somebody in their late teens or 20s, just like Peter Paul McMarry, what was her name?
Mary Travers.
And just stiff as a board.
I mean, imagine somebody just up there testifying, looking constipated like it has been months.
Just so stiff you can't believe it.
In every personal characteristic, every the manner of her speech.
And as I say, she was there to attest to Anita Hill's character.
And she was, I mean, she just went.
She to me was one of the funniest.
I ended up doing a mimic impression of her numerous times during these hearings.
And she would get sometimes combative with the various senators and try to interrupt them.
And at one point, some senator was, I forget who might it might have been Arlen Specter, was really zeroing in on the fact that Anita Hill had been following Clarence Thomas all over creation.
Every job he got, she was right there trying to follow him along.
And Judge Herchers in California, she and her husband live in California.
Senator, Senator, give me Senator.
I just want to say I revent, I revent the way you are attempting to impugn a character a manita.
It was Anita.
I happen to know Thunder Anita Hill.
I see here that we're running close on time, negating an end to the impersonation.
But she went on to describe how Anita was so pure and so clean, she hadn't even had to go to the bathroom in months.
I mean, I made that up.
I mean, just as a as a way of explaining is typifying what testimony Judge Hirchner.
And she, you know, one of these stupid administrative judges of, you know, snail contests or some sort of thing.
It was just bogus.
But man, all these people came out of the woodwork.
And it was, you know, Clarence Thomas called it a high-tech lynching is exactly what it was.
And it came shortly on the heels of the Robert Bork.
Uh, defamation and destruction.
And it was uh, I think that the Bush people learned a little bit of a lesson from what happened to Bork.
The Reagan people really didn't ever caught flat-footed.
I mean, nobody ever seen anything like this, what Teddy Kennedy had done to Bork.
So they didn't do anything.
They just let him kind of fly on his own out there.
And the uh the Bush people actually mounted a defense uh for Clarence Thomas, and he ended up squeaking by.
But they have not, they they have not stopped to this day.
They're mocking and their impugning, and dare I say their efforts to literally destroy the reputation of Clarence Thomas.
And I sit here in amazement at it.
You know, they do this, and we never hear how that's gonna anger the independents.
We never hear how the Democrats better dial back the partisan language and the vitriol, because that's just gonna anger them.
We only hear that when the Republicans start getting combative.
That's when the independents don't like that, and if the Republicans don't stop criticizing and start working with the Democrats, and the independents are gonna leave them.
Two-way streets been around for I don't know how long, back after this.
Socialism's inexorable march to destruction.
▲
Export Selection