All Episodes
Previous Next
May 27, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:32
May 27, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yeah, folks, I have to tell you up front here, it's been one of these hectic days where I've been on edge from the moment I got here.
I mean, it's things have been on the verge of breaking, then we fix them.
Then somebody needs something yesterday, and I have to take time out from what in other words, I've been interrupted practically every five minutes.
This program is my first moment of peace.
And I bet you it won't be five minutes for somebody inconsiderately sends me an email and asked, What did you say five days ago?
I'm looking to put it in the geez!
Have you ever heard of Google search?
Uh I'm just joking, folks.
I'm just I'm just joking.
As you know, we're here enjoying life and having a great time.
It's what we do at the EIB network, 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address L Rushmow at EIBNet.com and FIFA.
When I first heard about this, I was stunned.
We've got a new attorney general.
And how long has this investigation been going?
She didn't do this.
Did she start this?
This has started how many moons ago has this been going on?
Holder started this or something.
I didn't, not that that matters.
I'm just excuse me, the thing about this that blows my mind, of course, FIFA is corrupt.
They're a bunch of Western socialist guys.
Of course it's corrupt.
That's the story of the world before the United States of America came along as just another uh opportunity here to define American exceptionalism in a way.
I mean, we've got our own corruption.
But how the how do you go after FIFA and not touch the Clintons for crying out loud?
I mean, as I read what the FIFA guys have done, it's no different than what the Clinton Crime Family Foundation's doing.
Tax breaks, like one of the things the FIFA guys did for the World Cup in Brazil.
You know, soccer is the most popular sport in the world, and the FIFA guys run it like a fiefdom.
And a World Cup was in Brazil last year, and they built a stadium in some far-off little town in the interior.
And the stadium was going to be used for four games.
It costs 270 million dollars to build.
Brazil is slum city.
The people there are saying, wait a minute, what about us?
And the FIFA guys got a tax break for building a 270 million dollar stadium would be used for four games in the World Cup, and that's it.
There is a in the town where they built this stadium, there isn't a team.
There's nothing going on there that would fill that stadium for anything.
It was a total boondoggle.
I mean, it was it was obviously graft and and fraud and and and payoffs from the get-go.
And and this is what these these type guys have been known for.
It's like the Olympic committee.
You know, you read what FIFA did setting up what happened to the World Cup in Brazil, and you swear you're reading about the Olympics.
And the way they assigned.
I mean, you can't tell me that bribery and payoffs are not going on.
The Clinton Crime Family Foundation is evidence of what goes on around the world and how the Clintons think you have to deal with it.
But I'm not I'm not joking about this.
I mean, if you're going to investigate these FIFA guys, how do you let the Clinton Foundation off the hook?
They're selling influence.
It's just been discovered that Clinton's got a shell corporation.
You tell your average low information voter that some rich guy has a shell corporation and they want to put him in the electric chair.
Something about a shell corporation equates in the low information middle class community, shell corporation equals cheat.
Shell corporation, when you hear somebody has one or a company has a shell corporation, you immediately think somebody's cheating and hiding and not paying taxes and sheltering money.
That's exactly what people think of.
Whether they're right or wrong doesn't matter.
I'm talking about perceptions.
Well, Clinton's got a shell corporation.
He's got a pass through.
And this shell corporation was used to launder money that ends up in his back pocket in a sense.
That's what the purpose of a shell Corporate's a pass through, it has no assets.
There's no tax return filed for it.
Well, there might be a tax return, but the Shell Corporation never has any assets.
It is used to hide things.
It is to create a layer.
Another layer in case investigators ever come along.
Now you go out and tell your average Democrat that hates corporate America.
You go tell your average Democrat that some business, like, hey, did you hear about the Shell Corporation that forged using, oh, I'm not surprised for Shell Corporate?
You know they're cheating everybody.
Does Big Pharma have a shell corpse because they're killing their customers?
You go out and tell the same crowd that Bill Clinton is a shell corporation, and they'll find a reason to justify that a shell corporation is a good thing.
Shell Corporation passed through whatever.
Now get this.
This is from the Daily Beast, not the Daily Caller.
That's Chatsworth Osborne Jr.'s night, the Daily Beast.
Left wing.
Corrupt FIFA has Clinton Foundation ties.
World Cup host Cutter gave millions.
Both Bill Clinton and his family's charity have been tied to Soccer's governing body, FIFA, as well as Cutter's disastrous World Cup bid.
And just like that, another Clinton Foundation donor is in the news.
The Clinton Crime Family Global Charity has received between 50,000 and 100,000 from soccer's governing body and has partnered with the Federacion Internacional de Football Association on several occasions, according to donor listings on the Foundation's website.
What in the world is FIFA doing donating to the Clintons?
Now it remember now, this is the Obama Justice Department telling us that FIFA is nothing but rife corruption and graft and theft and fraud, and they're in business with the Clintons.
Why is FIFA giving money to the Clintons?
What in the world?
Is Hillary known for playing soccer or loving soccer?
Is Bill known for loving soccer?
It's clear the FIFA guys, this is how they do business.
They expect tax breaks, they expect gifts, they expect that if they are going to award, say the World Cup to a country or to a city or whatever, that city is going to end up paying them for the privilege.
And then some, both above the table, above the line, and below the line.
Anyway, several top FIFA executives arrested Wednesday in Zurich.
They face corruption charges stretching back twenty years.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, involvement with the embattled body extends beyond the foundation to Bill Clinton himself.
The former president was an honorary chairman of the bid committee put together to promote the United States as a possible host nation for the 2018 or 2022 World Cup.
When the U.S. lost the 2022 bid to Cutter, Clinton was rumored to be so mad he shattered a mirror.
But apparently Cutter, Qatar, to those of you in Rio Linda, tried to make it up to him.
The Cutter 2022 Supreme Committee partnering with the state of Qatar, committed to utilizing its research and development for sustainable infrastructure at the 2022 FIFA World Cup to improve food security in Qatar, the Middle East, and other arid and water stressed regions throughout the world.
This was a that's from the Clinton Foundation website.
The Clinton Crime Family Foundation pushing Cutter to host the World Cup, saying the state of Cutter is committed to utilizing its research and development for sustainable infrastructure.
And I love that with the Democrats are constantly talking about infrastructure.
Must be focused group on that word.
There must be magic.
Anyway, they're committed to utilizing its research and development for sustainable infrastructure At the 2022 FIFA World Cup to improve food security in Qatar.
The hell is food security.
I didn't know if food ever felt insecure.
Oh well.
The Middle East, food security in Cutter, in the Middle East and other arid and water stressed regions of the world, according to Clinton Foundation website.
The cost of the two-year project not listed on the Clinton Foundation website, but the Cutter 2022 committee gave the Foundation between a quarter of a million and a half million dollars in 2014, the state of cutter gave between one and five million to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
All related to a World Cup bid.
It's kind of like, remember when Obama was first immaculated and they sent him over there to Geneva or wherever it was to secure the Olympics for Chicago.
And in about five minutes, they told him to go pound sand on Michigan Avenue.
And it was a major embarrassment for the regime and everybody, because they thought it was a slam dunk.
Obama just won the Nobel Peace Prize, and they were believing their own media.
So Obama goes over there accompanying the Chicago host committee for the 20, whatever it was Olympics.
And they got rejected just and who got it?
Did Rio get it?
Along with the world, the Rio.
Yeah, they remember.
It was Rio who got it.
And so now Clinton gets rejected, representing the U.S. front of FIFA for the World Cup in the United States in 2022, ends up finding a partnership here with Cutter, which also wanted the games in 2022.
And if you're first question when you read about this FIFA scandal is, well, how do they not investigate something like the Clinton crime family?
I mean, I'm being serious, folks.
The Crime Family Foundation we throw in is humor, but for crying out loud, we know what this bunch of they're selling access to a sitting Secretary of State and on the cum selling access to a potential next president, Hillary Clinton.
There's no other reason people to be giving the amounts of money they're giving.
Expect they don't they're not docas Bill's a charismatic guy, and they're not doing it so they can company Bill, you know, on skirt chases.
These guys can pick up babes on their own.
They don't need to hang around Bill Clinton for that, and they certainly don't need to pay the Clinton Crime Family Foundation a hundred million or fifty million or even a hundred thousand dollars just so these guys can get women by hanging along with Clinton.
There's more than that to this.
And to think all of this was started, the Clinton Foundation stuff is the two reasons to get rich quick and to change the public image stemming from the Lewinsky circumstance.
But if you have, I'll just make this one more point.
If you have FIFA over here, and it's a corrupt organization, and we know it is, I mean, it's the way the world operates.
A bunch of European socialists for crying out loud.
The only way anybody in Europe in a socialist country has any money is to be screwing everybody else.
That's what socialism does.
The leaders make off with all the loot while the average ordinary population thinks that they're living the life of Riley by getting handouts here and handouts there.
They never get rich.
The guys running the show get rich.
The only way they can do it's by stealing from everybody.
They say capitalism, the rich get rich by stealing from the poor.
No, that's socialism.
In socialism, the middle class don't have a chance of getting rich.
In socialism, the middle class, lower class, they are condemned.
That's where they are.
If that's where they are, that's where they stay.
Capitalism, everybody's got a chance to move up.
I don't mean to say there's not fraud and corruption in capitalism.
There's fraud and corruption everywhere because there are bad guys out there, bad women now too out there.
Used to be there were no bad women, just bad guys, but now that women have positions of power, they're corrupt too.
Slap me.
It's true.
But in Western European socialism for crying out loud, it's the name of the game, it's the coin of the realm.
Corruption, graft.
Scratch my back, I'll scratch your back.
Want a bikini wax?
Fine.
I want something besides that.
Whatever it takes.
Cut corners, screw people left and right.
The fact that we're even taking time to try to straighten this out when soccer doesn't matter a hill of beans to anybody in this country.
Stop and figure that.
Meanwhile, the regime is royally ticked off over the appellate court in the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans for upholding the judge in Texas claiming Obama doesn't have the power to violate the Constitution.
They're saying this three-judge panel, the appellate court, they don't know how to read the law.
Really, they don't know how to read a letter.
All they did was read the Constitution, and it plainly does not permit Obama to be doing what he's doing, and that's what they said.
The regime response is they don't know how to read the law.
That's how cockeyed everything is.
On NPR, I've been called the world's greatest propagandist.
Get this, let's go to the audio soundbites.
Let's just get started with this.
Um, I'll tell you, let's not, so I don't have to have everything get horn swoggled here in a couple of minutes when we get back.
Let me take the break now, and we'll come back and and uh.
The guy admires me.
He wish he could do propaganda like I do, he says.
I'm NPR author or host or some such thing.
Okay, so let's see here, folks.
We got uh destruction of evidence, tax evasion, influence peddling, arms dealing, and now shell corporations.
Yeah, baby, that Hillary Clinton's one hell of a presidential candidate, isn't she?
I mean, all of that's wrapped up in the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
And the and the Clinton Shell Corporation, the crime family corporation, or the Shell Company that passed through, what Clinton was using that for was to hide consulting fees, not speech.
Clinton's out there being paid half a million dollars to consult a government here, a business over there, and the and the Shell Corporation was used to pass the income from that through to the foundation, or to him personally.
It's give me details on this coming up.
Just hang in there, folks.
And we got lots to do.
Marco Rubio on the money today, or yesterday, that we're on the road to Christianity being labeled hate speech.
If you haven't heard that, he's right on the money.
We saw it in Indiana.
We've seen it in Colorado, we've seen it related to gay marriage everywhere, and I'm telling you, he's he's more right than he may even know.
But here's what happened.
This is last night on NPR's on point.
And they have a guest host of this program named Jane Clayson.
She interviewed an author named David Schipler.
He's uh his book is Freedom of Speech, Mightier than the Sword.
Uh Kirsten Power is also on this show.
More about that in a moment, because she acted like she didn't know me.
Yeah, it's disappointing.
You know, it just anyway.
First things first.
The host says to David Schipler, the author of Freedom of Speech, Mightier than the Sword, you write about people like Rush Limbaugh using racial imagery to criticize Obama with no repercussions, but you write in the book about an ice cream store employee who put racial epithets of Obama online and was fired.
One's punished, one is rewarded, meaning me.
Here's the reply.
Let's face it, it's money.
Rush Limlaw does make millions of dollars, and he brings in has a huge audience.
I think he's America's master propagandist.
If you use the definition of propaganda that I heard when I was a Moscow correspondent from a Soviet professor who described it as a truth, a truth, a truth, and then a lie.
You weave in facts that are indisputable, or then half facts, semi-truths, and then by the time you've got the listener engaged, you put in a lie or a semi-lie.
I love to listen to Rush Limbaugh, actually.
I do listen to him when I'm driving at the right time.
And there's practically no place in the country where you can't pick him up in the early afternoon.
Because I really want to know how he does this.
It's very clever.
Can you imagine this?
A full-fledged leftist admitting or claiming that he doesn't know how to lie and massage things to move his agenda forward.
And then having to do this this is this is projection.
This is exactly what these guys do.
They are the ones that propagandize.
And worse than that, they indoctrinate, which is what public and and private education is becoming.
And certainly university education, it's not mind-opening, it's mind-closing, and it's indoctrination.
You know, I think this program, I was thinking about this driving in because I get I don't admit this much, folks, but sometimes some of the criticisms of this program really rub me raw.
And especially the criticisms of you being a bunch of idiots and mind-num robots.
This program, this program compared to what you get anywhere else.
This is Harvard.
This program is higher education.
This program is a cut above practically everything in the media, from the way the information's presented, the depth of the information, most importantly, the way you are treated.
You are respected.
You are assumed to be intelligent enough to be able to handle everything that I throw at you in terms of things that interest me.
The depth that we get into on these issues, we go way beneath the surface, and you're right there keeping up with it all.
This is one of the brightest, most intelligent outposts in the American media.
And it has been for 25 years and counting.
And it's these other places that dumb down everybody and seek to limit their learning and exposure to new ideas, things, and so forth.
Have to take a break back in a sec.
Great to have you back, Rush Lindbaugh here behind the Golden EIB microphone at 800 282-2882.
So David Schipler says that he heard the Soviet definition of propaganda as a lie, a lie.
I'm sorry, a truth, a truth, a truth, and a lie.
Now, I folks, look, I know I uh this is a great illustration of a widening divide that exists between people in in this country.
Uh this idea that, and remember how this this question is all about how I am racist when it comes to Obama.
My criticism of Obama is racist, and I there are no repercussions that come to me because I make so many people so much money that I have freedom to get away with being racially critical of Obama.
But they never offer any examples of it because they can't.
So what they've created is the idea is that any criticism of Obama is now racism.
Any and all, and that was from the get go, by the way.
That was the way it was set up.
One of the advantages of having the first African American president on your side is that any criticism of him whatsoever automatically targeted or charged up to racism.
And it's this has been one of the greatest tools to silence any criticism of Obama.
It's just I have not reacted the way I've not shut up.
I have continued my relentless criticism, substantive, issue-oriented criticism of Obama.
The Republican Party has stood down.
The Republican Party took debate.
The Republican, okay, okay, I don't want to be called racist, please don't call me racist.
I I won't criticize Obama.
I uh I may criticize his policies, but please understand, I'm I I'm not criticizing him.
That's been their attitude.
But I have not been intimidated or you don't like that word.
I've not been persuaded to curtail my criticism of Obama.
And so my criticism of Obama is effective.
So it has to be tagged as racism or bigotry or something to discredit it, which is how these people operate.
And that's what this little soundbite's all about.
Limbaugh, yay, just lies and make things up.
Get some truth in there, just to seduce people, and he builds his audience with truth here, little truth, and then comes the big lie about Obama.
Man, I marvel at how he does it.
All there is on this program is 100% total honesty.
And those times we're wrong, it's not because we're trying to be wrong.
This program is a is a daily devotion to accuracy.
There's nothing in it for me to be wrong about something, and nothing in it for me to lie about something to create a false impression in your mind.
There's nothing in it for me to convince you that something that's false is true.
I I don't have an agenda.
I don't have an issue-oriented agenda.
I mean, I'm not in politics, I'm in the media.
But I do have a duty to you, and that's to be who I am and be honest.
Don't make things up, don't do any of these things.
These guys, they Can't figure out how an audience of this size was attracted, number one, and they can't figure out how it's been maintained, particularly when they have all done everything they can to destroy this program over the course of the number of years we've been on, and they have been able to.
And I understand their curiosity.
Understand their frustration here.
But if you want to talk about a lie, a lie, a lie, and a truth, you've just described Obamacare.
You've just described the stimulus bill.
You've just described Obama's amnesty.
You've just described the treaty with Iran.
A lie, a lie.
Or a truth, a truth, a truth, and then a lie.
Anyway, that's not even what propaganda is.
Propaganda, the original definition of the word comes from the Catholic Church to propagate the faith.
Propaganda propagate.
That's the original root of the word.
And then of course Soviets commandeered it, because that's what their system was was made of.
But the number of lies that have been told about Obamacare alone could could you could you could write books about them?
You know, Obama said 36 different times.
You like your doctor, you keep your doctor.
36 different times.
You like your health care plan, you get to keep it.
How many times Obama promises us that the deficit would not get any bigger because of Obamacare?
How many times he tell you your premiums would go down $2,500 a year?
I mean, where do we stop?
It's not where do we start with the lies that have come out of this administration.
Where do we stop with them?
There's no end to them.
And and to listen to me accused of propaganda.
If there's anybody getting away with dishonesty in attracting their audience in American media, it's the drive-by media.
Well, anyway, let there's another soundbite here because Schipler, after saying, I love to listen to Rush Limbaugh, actually I do listen to him when I'm driving at the right time.
And there's practically no place in the country where you can't pick him up in the early afternoon, because I really want to know how Limbaugh does this.
It's very clever.
And then he added this.
For example, he talks about Obama as angry.
Obama has spent his career trying not to be the angry black man, much to the chagrin of some of his supporters.
And uh Limbaugh gets away with it.
He says Obama has a chip on his shoulder that you know he's part of the group that's now gained power, and they're gonna show the rest of the country uh and there's gonna be race riots.
Well, what are there not race riots?
Did I start them?
There are race riots.
They're getting worse.
They're becoming more numerous.
Was it racist to predict them?
I have nothing to do with them starting.
I have nothing to do with them actually happening.
I just read the tea leaves.
And when did it become racist to say that Obama's angry?
Of course Obama's angry.
You've seen it, we've all seen him angry on TV.
What makes that observation racist?
Well, obviously it isn't racist.
It's another in a never-ending list of ways that they attempt to discredit Obama critics in the eyes of fellow liberals and low information voters.
Obama angry, that's a stereotape.
Angry black man, then limbla, he's using it.
I don't know stereotypes.
I'm just commenting on what I see.
I'm commenting on what I know.
Obama does have a chip on his shoulder.
Half the people in this country do.
Bummed out about the way it was founded, bummed out about certain things that have happened in this country over the course of 200 years.
A lot of people have a chip on their shoulder.
Obama's got the power to do something about it.
There are race riots.
Obama is angry, and see it's racist to point that out.
This is supposed to quell me.
They're supposed to quiet me.
They're supposed to frighten me.
I'm sorry, oh my God, I can't stand that only.
They call me racist, well, that's gonna be bad.
Okay, I'll shut up, I'll shut up.
That's how the Republican Party's reacted to this, but I haven't.
Now they get the Kirsten Powers, who was also on this show.
She's got her book called Silenced, uh, How the Left is Stifling Free Speech or Whatever.
And the host said, uh, Kirsten, what do you think it is?
You you agree with uh with uh with Schipler?
I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, so I can't speak to what he's doing, but I also have to say I take issue with the idea that saying somebody's angry is racist.
We have to be able to say that an African American president can be angry.
I mean, that's not to me that just shouldn't be out of bounds.
I think that's chilling.
It's a little disappointing.
I just I spent 45 minutes on the phone with her last week interviewing her for the upcoming issue of the Limbaugh letter.
I've had some email exchanges back and forth with her about this.
Now I there was even um there's one other thing I will I will not share.
I don't want to embarrass her.
But this is I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, so I don't I can't speak to what he's doing.
She's talked to me enough.
I mean, she wanted well, she's talked to me enough to know.
She just didn't want to weigh in.
And this is, you know, I it it's one of the things I uh, you know, I defended her when she initially came under attack from her friends on the left for writing this book.
It's one of the things I asked her about in the upcoming interview of the Limbaugh Letter.
I asked her how our friends have reacted.
Say, well, the book isn't out yet, and it wasn't.
It comes out, it came out on the 11th of May.
We did the interview a few days prior.
And so it really wasn't out yet, and a lot of her quote-unquote uh ideological friends hadn't read it.
But once they had, and once she started going on TV, they started attacking her left and right and her reputation, and she was very worried about it.
And uh I don't know.
I I I I pointed out to her that one of the things that I do, and it was an effort to inform her of what happens here.
One of the things I do is I get up every day and I see the people that I like or care about, the institutions that I like and care about.
I see them under assault, and I come here and I defend them every day.
It's basically what I do because we are under assault in this country.
Those of us on the right, what we believe in, our traditions, institutions, everything's under attack.
I come here and I defend them every day.
And in the midst of defending them, I try to promote what we believe.
I defend a lot of people that come under attack.
Um so this is kind of disappointing to act like she doesn't know who I am and doesn't know enough about me to be able to enter the fray.
But it's typical.
A lot of people do not want to happen what happens to them when they enter all of this.
And the left really capitalizes on that.
They have learned that they can easily intimidate people into shutting up and going away.
It's gotten to the point they have figured out they can easily intimidate people into essentially conceding and not even joining the fight.
It's happening in gay marriage.
It's it's it's happening with militant uh uh gay issues all over the country, and any other number of uh leftist issues.
Intimidation, threats in your face, character defamation, defamation on Twitter, you name it.
It's an all-out assault.
It's totally understandable that most people wouldn't want to get anywhere near any of that.
They just want to live their lives.
And the left capitalizes on that, takes advantage of it, and they've learned very easily who they can silence, who they can intimidate.
And once something like that works, why change it?
Why give it up?
This is why they continue to be so focused on talk radio in Fox.
We haven't caved.
And that's the real reason.
Aside from the ideological problems they have, the left has.
The real reason they just are relentless here is because they can't.
They're frustrated we haven't given up, like the Republican Party has.
They're frustrated we haven't caved and gone away.
So they continue to mount the pressure and do what they do.
And includes whatever it takes to discredit and get rid of opposition, be it character defamation or racial attacks, you name it.
Anything's fair in ridding the playing field of any opposition from their point of view.
Quick time out.
We'll be back with more after this.
Don't go away.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Let's see, what I just uh just saw something here.
Oh, yeah.
The uh there's a new donor to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation has just been revealed.
Penguin Random House donated between one and five grand to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
They just announced a book deal with Chelsea Clinton.
Chelsea Clinton's gonna do a children's book to help him deal with climate change.
You know, issues that really matter to young kids how to deal with racism and sexism and climate change and all that.
And a book is going to be published by Penguin, a donor to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
Sissing NBC hires Chelsea at 600 grand when she hasn't the slightest idea what she's doing.
She might not even know what the red light on the camera means.
She'd never been on TV.
They hired her to put her on NBC Daylight, and Brian Williams said, Oh, I've never seen anybody with more natural talent.
I've never, oh my gosh, we're all blown away here.
She never made it on the air past the first attempt.
600 grand.
Everybody knew NBC buying access to the Clintons by giving the kids some independent money.
Now here comes Penguin Random House.
I mean, could you know what?
It might be quicker.
Could somebody name for me a major American player in anything who has not paid protection money to the Clintons.
Every major automobile manufacturer has every major media and small, large medium media companies have all made protection racket donations to the Clintons.
I mean, every seems like everywhere you turn.
Now we find out FIFA's involved, a government, a cutter in trying to get the World Cup in 2022 sought the assistance of Clinton.
And it failed.
But honestly, it would take less time to list the people that haven't given money.
I mean the major players.
To the uh Clinton Global Trust or whatever.
Heck it is.
Now, back to David Schipler.
This is after after Kirsten Powers has said, you know, I've taken issue with uh saying somebody is angry is racist.
I don't think that's true.
They went back to David Schiffler, who claimed that I'm the world's best propagandist.
You know, the truth, a truth of truth, and then a lie.
And he wrapped up, I think it's the rap.
Let me make sure to check the next, but yep, rap wrapped up the segment.
If you read the transcripts of what Rush Limbaugh says, he doesn't leave it there.
He links it to a whole social movement that is very threatening and it's kind of scary.
Well, he's talking about the comment that uh, you know, Kirsten Power said, hey, wait, just be calling Obama angry is not racist.
So Schipler here is coming, but well, if you read the transcripts of what Rush Limbaugh says, as though they're hard to find and very mysterious, if you read the transcripts of what Rush Limbaugh actually says, he doesn't leave it there.
No.
He links it to a whole social movement.
It's very threatening and it's kind of scary.
Well, damn it, there is Obama is the head honcho of a massive transformation of the American culture, the American society, and our government.
What the hell is there to deny here?
It is a major social movement.
And it does threaten a lot of people.
What do you think the Tea Party's all about?
Who do these people have literally no idea how the things they are doing are perceived by average ordinary Americans whose lives are not centered and focused around all this every day.
People are scared to death.
I can't tell you the number of people who ask me if I think we've lost the country.
I can't tell the number of people who come up to me and tell me we already have, and I'm just whistling into the wind here.
By the way, that's not the end of me being discussed on NPR.
I was also taken to task on New York City NPR.
Actually, a lib was taken to task for sounding too much like me.
▲
Export Selection