All Episodes
Previous Next
May 20, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:29
May 20, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, and I still say keep an eye on O'Malley.
See, I I I have never said that Hillary is a guaranteed lock on anything.
I've never thought it.
I've been proven wrong.
There were times I even didn't think she would run that she did.
And so I've I've I've very seldom I have to admit when it comes to Hillary and Hillary's the biggest drag on my accuracy, my opinion audit.
Hillary Clinton's a biggest drag because I always get her wrong.
And I'm still, and I get her wrong because I just can't believe what I'm told about her.
I just can't believe any of it.
Now we got Walter O'Malley, sorry.
Patriarch of the Los Angeles Dodgers, Martin O'Malley of Baltimore, who's not doing the Vladimir Putin impersonation.
He's taking his shirt off, he's showing the six-pack abs, well, maybe four-pack.
Uh, and the pecs, and he's out there flexing, and he's trying to draw a comparison, generational youth and vigor and vim and energy versus stayed old maidism, which is what you find in Mrs. Clinton.
Uh nurse Ratchetism, actually.
And I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary actually, if the politico is right, and I think they are, if Hillary's attitude, if it's if if Hillary's strategy is to campaign as if she's already president, just to be able to effect and present a presidential aura instead of campaigning for president.
Strategy means just act like you're there.
Act like it's already happened.
You're Hillary Clinton.
You don't have to run for anything.
All you have to do is say you want it, and the nation will give it to you.
That's the strategy.
It's kind of like the old Pittsburgh Steelers coach Chuck Knoll.
He did not want his players celebrating at touchdowns.
You're supposed to be there.
It isn't any big deal when you score a touchdown.
It's just your job.
You give the ball to the referee and you get back to the sideline getting ready for the next play.
Don't act like it's unusual to be there in the end zone.
What's the same strategy with Hillary, don't act like you have to get with the rest of the crowd and actually seek this office.
You act like it already is yours.
You act as though you're already there every way except physically.
And then over here we're gonna have the Republicans dogging it out and fighting it out and taking each other out because the theory is they won't go after Hillary much, because they'll be too busy going after themselves.
But if Hillary continues with that strategy, the ongoing there is a train of thought that it it it opens a door for O'Malley to combat her and compete against her from the left.
But remember the story we had a couple of days ago, that Hillary is going to attempt to win by reassembling the Obama coalition of uh young people and African Americans.
And to do that, she's gotta go even further left than Obama.
And the story was that that's going to be easy because the country's already there.
That Hillary is not going to have to lead the country to the left.
She's not going to have to persuade them anymore in the value of the welfare state and the value of a big government and the value of 93 million Americans not working and the value of open borders immigration.
The country's already there.
All she has to do is adopt those positions that people already hold, and she's in like Flint.
And I saw I should have printed this out.
It was um right before the program started, and it was time crunch time, and I didn't have time to print it out.
And it's it's a story about a black Republican who thinks that the Republican Party is going to save itself and is going to triumph once again by doing two things.
Accepting the welfare state and immigration.
And if the Republican Party does that, then that's and it's the only way the Republican by 2024, by 2028, if the Republican Party hasn't come to grips with those two things, it will not exist.
And this this African American, I don't even know if he's a Republican.
I can't remember his name.
I'll somebody'll find it for me during the breaker, I'll find it myself.
But, and I'd never heard of him, by the way, which doesn't mean anything.
He could be a hot to trot guy and Twitter, Facebook, and I wouldn't know.
But he was, he's, I guess he's hot enough to trot that people write stories about what he thinks.
And he's he clearly says the Republican Party is going to have to come to grips with the fact the American people want a welfare state.
They're already they've said so.
They're living it.
They don't have any problem with it.
And the American people, open borders, immigration, Republican Party, because of demographics, is going to have to get there.
If it doesn't, it will never be able to compete with the Democrats.
And it's more of the same.
In other words, the Republicans, in order to survive, are going to have to become Democrats that call themselves Republicans.
You couple that with Mrs. Clinton thinking we're already there.
And I'll tell you what I think of all this.
I think it means she's setting herself up for what could be a landslide loss.
Because I'm here to tell you this country has not accepted the welfare state.
It's the other way around.
I'm telling you this, the people of this country and the evidence is in by phone calls and emails and texts to Congress and polling data, and how are you want to look at this country has not decided open borders immigration is the future.
The majority of people in this country and people who vote in this country, those things are not reality yet.
And to the extent that Hillary or any other Democrat thinks they are, I think they're setting themselves up for major, major disappointments.
But that again then depends on what the Republicans do with it.
That's yeah, I think it is.
It's a black guy writes for Slate.
Uh which, of course, Slate just.
Oh, he is.
He's a total lefty.
All right.
Okay, well, then disregard well, no disregarded.
I mean, it's just another liberal in a long line of liberal and telling Republicans what they have to do to survive.
So we'll we'll see.
I I just I refuse to believe we've hit this tipping point.
And I refuse to believe that it's a fate accompli for Mrs. Just just like you know, with Scott Walker had the early lead in that uh the first ever event in Iowa that he just smoked everybody, and then he went to New Hampshire, smoked everybody.
This was before everybody had gotten in, but he would just smoke and everybody and and it was one of those circumstances where he's maybe a little too much too soon.
Because when you when you're in the 60s in uh in approval and so forth, a year and a half out, the most likely direction that you would go is down.
But that hasn't happened to Walker so much.
I'll tell you the highlights right now, if you had to boil down the Republican presidential primary and who's hot right now.
There are three names that come to mind.
Rubio, who is a recent arrival to Hot.
Cruz, and Scott Walker.
Scott Walker continues to have the have great answers, say when this Iraq question comes up.
Uh he just is unflappable on the campaign trail, and it's precisely because of what he has already been through as governor of Wisconsin.
Uh Cruz is a natural born fighter and doesn't accept anything.
And Rubio has has come on strong, which is a surprise to people because the conventional wisdom was that that Rubio and Bush can't be in the same time, because they're both from Florida, and they'll both divvy up votes and they'll divvy up donors and and all that.
And this disregard to conventional wisdom when you hear it all the time.
Carly Fiorina is coming on strong in terms of someone really taking it to Hillary.
There's uh what is the the New Jersey, the Bergen County record, is that still the name of the paper?
A scathing editorial today on Governor Christie.
Just scathing.
Does this guy not know?
That the two-thirds of the people of this state now don't like him?
Does this Guy not know he's not popular anymore?
Does this guy not know he has become a public buffoon?
Does this guy not know?
That the people of New Jersey are not dazzled by the act anymore.
Just it's just vicious, and it makes the point that Christie's so out of touch with real people he doesn't know how unpopular he really is.
But that's what's going on with Christie.
And then Jeb, yeah, wild horse, because there's an argument that he who ends up with the most money is the ultimate winner.
Money being the mother's milk of politics, and it's assumed that Jeb is going to end up with more money than any of these other people.
But Rubio came in with a couple of shocking donors, Larry Ellison from Oracle and Norman Brayman, the former owner of the Philadelphia Eagles, who's become a billionaire selling cars.
What does that tell you about the car business?
Maybe how overpriced they are.
And I'm sure he's a good being critical of anything here.
But all the while, the real excitement, the real thrills, the real intellectual opportunity, the real argument about how to fix this country's taking place on the Republican side.
Mrs. Clinton isn't saying a word about anything because in her mind she's already elected.
That's the strategy to appear presidential.
And you have George Will coming along pointing out it's not going to work because all she does is demonstrate how unsuited for this she is, how incompetent she is, which is my take too, but it never seems to manifest itself.
Anyway, it's still a year and a half out, and anything can happen.
But those are the three names right now on the Republican side that seem to have the sizzle.
Would you not agree, Snertley?
And it's exciting.
It's exciting on the Republican side.
By the way, I don't want to leave Rand Paul out.
You know, Rand Paul is is uh his fists up and he's he's out there punching away, too.
Uh Lindsey Graham, why did he get in the race?
You say people are wondering why Lindsey Graham's excuse me, ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Snerdley asking me a question over the IFB.
Does Lindsay Graham actually think that he has a chance to uh win out in the field?
Does he actually think he has a chance?
I haven't talked to uh Senator Graham about this.
I don't know what he's thinking, since it's open to speculation.
Um, I can only guess, and it would probably be very, very unfair of me to guess.
But if I had to take a step, if you were waterboarding me right now, demanding to know what I think about it, I'd have to say, well, it's a resume enhancement.
Former presidential candidate.
It's a resume enhancement for a lot of things.
It's Fox News commentator job.
Uh public speaking, corporate outings, um, the number of benefits that accrue to people.
You see it now.
I mean, you see somebody that ran for president eight years ago, former presidential candidate, uh Jerry Brown, whatever the name is, it stays with you forever.
Doesn't matter if you lose.
Former president, and you're an expert, by the way, in the process, so you're always being interviewed about the other people still in the race and how it's going.
Back to the phones after this when we get back.
Don't go away.
Before we get to the phones, here is an interesting example.
This is a story found by Catherine Timff, National Review online, I think on the blog.
People for the ethical treatment of animals sent a letter to the oldest bar in Britain on Monday, demanding that they change their name.
Because the name of the bar, the pub, is offensive to chickens.
And they're dead serious.
They're deadly serious.
The name of the bar is ye old fighting cocks.
I don't know if it's chickens who ought to be insulted by that name or men.
But regardless, Peter thinks it's chickens that are offended.
And so the bar has to shut down or change its name.
An American PETA group made probably got a British chapter.
These people on the left have become so brain dead, so corrupted, with all of this political correctness.
You see a story like this.
The first thing you do, if you're in my position, you make sure this is real.
You go and see if you can find it on some satire site.
See if somebody's been bamboozled by this.
So you check the onion, you check any number of satires.
Then you find out the damn thing is real.
PETA director, Mimi Bakichi said the name should be changed to ye old clever cocks, because that would celebrate chickens as the intelligent, sensitive social animals they are, according to an article about this in the UK Mirror.
The pub is Britain's oldest according to the Guinness World Records book, and has said the name since 1872.
And they're dead serious.
I know it's it in the old day, we'd laugh ourselves silly about this, and we'd make fun of these people, and we think no way is anybody gonna join this Kakamami group, and they keep getting bigger, and people keep signing on, and I'll tell you why.
I'm gonna tell you why.
All of this, you know, to become serious about an organization defending the integrity of chickens, telling a bar it's got to change its name because it's offensive to chickens.
When everybody's a chicken can't freaking read and doesn't have any slightest idea what anything is called, a chicken doesn't even know it's a chicken for crying out loud.
All a chicken should know is it's dead pretty soon.
And that's it.
But yet people sign up and they join this cause.
Because animals have been in the in the animal rights movement, animals have been equated with human beings.
And the only way that can happen is these people have no God in their lives.
And do not doubt me on this.
And this, I think, is a result of what has been an onslaught attack against Christianity, particularly and religion in general for decades, and this is how it ultimately manifests itself when you have people whose lives are so empty and so meaningless because they have never been taught that there are things larger than themselves.
And they've never been taught the primacy of human beings.
They've been taught the guilt of human beings.
They have literally no God in their lives, much less no church, no religion.
Uh to the extent they do, it's environmentalism, which is their religion and so forth, and that's how you end up with literally corrupt brains, damaged brains like this.
But they vote Democrat.
And the Democrat Party encourages all this kind of stuff.
They vote Democrat.
Anyway, here's Jimmy in Spring, Texas.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Rush, two quick points for you.
Yeah.
Number one.
Your discussion yesterday regarding mad men and the article stating that women in New York City longed for the man of the sixties.
Yes, I still have that story here, in fact.
Rush, I'd like to say I'd like to add on that, and that is, although I live in Texas, I I visit New York fairly frequently.
And what I've noticed in New York is that New York has lost manly men.
They've lost uh men filled with testosterone.
It's it's become a haven of uh, you know, pencil neck, little short glass swearing feminine guys.
And I think women in New York long for the day of a manly man.
Well, maybe.
But how can how do you been to enough of New York New York's a big place?
How have you been to enough of New York to make a sweeping judgment about all the men there like you just did?
Curious.
Just an observation, Rush.
But but I do have a second point.
Well, now wait a second.
Wait, let me just let me concede for a second that that's true.
Let's say that what you say is true, that that the men of New York have become wussified and they're pencil neck geeks, and a little short, shriveling little linguiny-spined wimps.
Who made them that way?
Who made them that way?
I would probably say the society that they live in and the the you know the PETA folks that you just spoke about.
I mean, you have to work pretty hard to take the manly out of men.
You have to work pretty hard to take manliness out of men.
You have to put you have to work pretty hard to take little boy out of little boy.
You have to work pretty hard to get little boy to put up G.I. Joe and pick up Barbie.
How do you do it?
Well, they moved south, Rush.
So they've moved to other areas of the country that respect and uh embrace manliness.
Okay, what was the what was the second point you wanted to make?
I didn't mean to I just fine, Rush.
And that is this whole myth of inevit inevitability regarding Hillary.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yes.
Rush, here's a point that's not being talked about, and that is in 2008 and in many ways 2012, Barack Obama was the beneficiary of a great amount of uh white voters who exercised white guilt.
Yeah.
That they were casting that ballot and probably walking out of that voting booth, beating their chest saying, I am now not a racist.
I have to black men.
You think Hillary's not going to get those votes for the same reasons.
Rush, there's no push amongst white men to say I need to rid myself of the sexism guilt.
It's not there, Rush.
Now that is an excellent point.
I doubt there'll be a whole lot of white men running around.
I gotta vote for Hillary so that people of this country know I love women.
Ha!
If that's what you have to do to demonstrate you love women, you are in a horrible starting point uh point.
Half my brain tied behind my back, as always, just to be fair.
In those rare moments that a liberal actually calls the program.
They are afraid to do so.
And the reason they're afraid is they think they're gonna get hung up on.
They believe a bunch of myths about uh this program because they believe a bunch of myths about talk radio.
We uh we put liberals at the front of the line when they call in.
We always have.
But you can make book on it.
Within 30 seconds, they will resort to name calling, defamation, or what have you, and we have to get rid of them, or else they hang up themselves after throwing out what they think is a real cutting insult, just a childish little barb.
But that's why half my brain's tied behind my back and keep it fair in case they call.
Here is uh here's Alex in Sayerville, New Jersey.
Uh, your next sir, great to have you with us.
Hi.
Uh, good afternoon, Rush.
I just want to make uh a point that uh Hillary acting presidential already and not uh eating to and not feeling necessary to answer the questions will be yet another ace in the hole for Republicans because they because they will get to define her without any opposition, so to speak, besides the surrogate.
Uh so uh I say I think uh the more the more she avoids answering the question, she's not doing herself any favors.
And when she does answer questions, she's not gonna do herself any favors either.
I think it's gonna be a great thing, I think helpful just to do the full thing.
Yeah, you know, that's that is an excellent point.
Let me let me deal with this uh by answering somewhat personally.
The idea of Hillary not answering questions, but wanting to be president at the same time.
Those two things don't go together, folks.
If if because if you want to be president, you have to have a degree of passion that exceeds far exceeds the passion normal people have for whatever they want to do because it's arduous.
It's a media anal exam.
It's it's long hours, it's a bunch of repetitive things.
It's it's things that you wouldn't otherwise do in the course of the day.
You have to act like you're happy to meet everybody you run into.
You have to just do all kinds of things and laboriously.
There aren't days off.
So if you really want that job, it is required that you have a significant amount of passion.
Now, if you've got that passion, one of the manifestations of that passion is a desire to tell everybody what you think because Your passion has convinced you you are inalterably correct, and that everybody needs to hear what you think because everybody needs to know what right is and what correct is.
And you are you are obsessed with telling people what you think.
Now, they all have consultants who try to reign that in.
The job of most consultants is to get candidates to not be themselves, and instead to agree to be packaged according to daily polling and focus grouping and things like this.
But the normal candidate is just bursting at the seams to tell people what he or she thinks.
Because that's how you persuade, and that's how you get followers.
That's how you get people to support you.
That Mrs. Clinton doesn't want to do that, and instead has opted for this aura campaign, which by the way, Obama did too.
Obama's whole modus operandi was to act as though he was already elected, with the God reverb at every speech and those massive crowds.
That's why he wanted in his Berlin speech to do it at the Brandenburg Gate, because you are officially something if you are invited to speak there.
And they wouldn't invite him as a candidate.
That wasn't enough of an achievement to speak at the Brandenburg Gate.
So he got as close to it as he could.
Romney, well Republicans as of as a whole generally reject that because they think it's phony.
And they think it's it's jumping the gun.
And they think to act presidential before you've actually become president's disingenuous, and people will see right through it.
But my point with this is I think Hillary's reluctance to answer questions, her reluctance to want to face the press is all I need to know that she really doesn't have this passion, and that she really is afraid of telling people what she really thinks.
I don't buy for a minute that she and her campaign really believe this country has gone to the dark side of liberalism, that we've gone past the tipping point, and that we are inexorably now an official socialist country.
I do not believe that.
I think Hillary Clinton studiously purposely avoiding every opportunity to communicate with people.
This this goes against the grain of every thing a presidential candidate wants to do.
Not a lot of people seek the job because it it carries with it its own unique set of qualifications and requirements.
And 99 out of 99 and a half percent wouldn't want to get anywhere near it.
Just the media coverage alone, most people wouldn't put up with.
And all of all of those negatives are overcome by this passion that you have, this ego drive that the country needs you.
Every successful candidate has that.
She's not exhibiting any of this.
She's hiding.
And I think this the strategy of assuming the aura of presidents, uh, she is already elected.
I think that is actually a defensive rather than offensive strategy.
And I think it's a defensive strategy because they, I don't think she or her handlers feel comfortable throwing her out there, particularly ad lib.
The last time she tried it for any length of time was where?
At the United Nations, where they purposely chose a press corps that they didn't think would be up to speed on whatever it was of a controversial nature.
I mean, it was her email server.
And you remember what a disaster that was.
They had to literally go get her off that stage way before she was scheduled to finish, because she was wandering aimlessly in vain search of a thought.
It was clear she didn't know what to say.
She didn't because she was trying not to say anything.
And they've made the judgment that the safest place for Hillary Clinton is hidden away.
Because the only thing that can happen if she goes public and starts talking is negative.
Because she does not come across as a natural.
She doesn't come across with this passion.
She comes I'll never, folks, little things.
I remember election day 1992.
This is actually election night.
This is after it's over, and we know that Bill Clinton has won.
And the cameras, it's nighttime in Little Rock, and the cameras are focused on this makeshift platform that has been built right outside the governor's residence in Little Rock.
And everybody's gathering and waiting for the president and the first lady elect to emerge and stand there and accept the accolades of the thousands there who have just elected them.
And they finally did come out.
And they started walking around that temporary stage, shaking hands.
And I will never forget Hillary that night and the impression that she gave off, at least the impression that I took from watching this.
And it was not isolated, it was not in a vacuum because she had been part of the campaign.
But she had this aura of entitled expectation.
She she was strutting around strutting.
She was walking around almost as though she was the nominee, and she was the reason that they had won.
And it was to me, it it looked like she felt so far above these people that were obviously physically way below her because this stage was five or six feet high, and the only thing people could get up to the stage if they're standing up, their hands could barely get above the stage.
The Clintons had to lean way down and practically get on hand and need to shake anybody's hands.
They were that far above them and therefore removed from them.
And I'll never forget either that Carville was in the crowd.
Carville and Bagala and Stefanov were in the crowd as though they were no different than the crowd.
And here's the campaign team.
Here's the war room.
You'd think they'd be in the house.
You'd think that they'd have been part of the celebration in the House.
Maybe they were.
But I thought it was interesting that they're out there in the crowd as though they're no different than the crowd.
And Carville's reaching up and shaking Bill's head.
Way to go, buddy.
It's like he just an average voter.
And the impression given was way above your way beneath.
And Hillary had that look on her face as as though this were not an exciting time, but rather just a fait accompli.
And she's decided to take on this same attitude in aura now.
And I'm telling folks, it just it doesn't jibe with somebody who really wants this, who really can't wait to tell you what she thinks, and persuade you that she's right.
Most people running for president want to engage people.
They especially the people disagree with them.
They want to get to them and try to change their minds and get them to agree.
This is after they've spent all the time with the money people, granted, that's who you go to first.
But she doesn't, she's she doesn't she doesn't exhibit any of these standard, ordinary human behavioral traits.
And now to cert to learn that they're purposely structuring her and as as the already elected president just going through the motions.
I don't think it's going to be enough.
I really don't think it's going to be enough because I think they're living in a little bit of a illusion or delusion.
Um I think they still think we're back in the 90s in terms of the way people look at them and marvel at them and treat them as rock stars and this kind of thing.
But we'll see.
Could be wrong about this.
I haven't been right about Mrs. Clinton on a well, a few things, but most not.
I have to admit that.
So take it what it's worth.
Here's Ray in Livermore, California, on the Lawrence Livermore Labs, nuclear weapons research.
Greetings, and great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hey, uh Mega Lost email Ditto's Rush.
Thank you, sir.
In the first hour you were talking about uh why Hillary is still in this race.
You couldn't understand it.
And I I think it's time to invoke liberal leftist nomenclature and say this is clearly a case of white privilege.
Well, now wait, wait, wait.
I I did not say I don't understand why she's still in the race.
Because I know why she's still in the race.
I'm not surprised why she's still in the race.
That's not what I was surprised at.
Um there are other things about her campaign that surprise me that I'm I'm surprised that she's thought of the way she is as some sort of savior and improvement on Obama.
I just there's a whole bunch of this stuff that just surprises me.
But but anyway, I don't want to take away from your point, which what is it you think that she's simply a case of white privilege?
Yeah, it could even be genitalia privilege, also, because we're supposed to vote for her strictly on what's below the belt and not what's above the shoulders.
So uh and to use even more leftist nomenclature, isn't um her entire campaign evidence of income inequality as well as her foundation.
Is isn't that whole thing just more evidence of this leftist claptrap of income inequality?
I mean, they're they're the very example of it.
I'm not sure I follow how sh her foundation and income inequality go into this.
You mean she's doing what she's doing to get all this money because she doesn't make as much as a man.
We would be led to believe that.
Well, let's say you were going to uh go to one of her fundraisers, you have to be a $2,500 donor who has also bundled ten other donors.
So uh right there, it's a case of uh income inequality right out of the box.
Uh oh, you mean she's she's you have to be super rich to be a respected supporter of hers, is what you mean.
To even get her ear or any attention of her.
Stephanopoulos said it himself.
This by giving these donations to the foundation, you're you're buying access.
He he said it in in a few different words, but essentially that's what you're getting.
And and the same thing with uh with her campaign donations.
And I I just find it funny.
Not funny.
It's it's just so hypocritical.
Obama and Hillary both stomping around talking about these things, these privileges and these inequalities.
Yeah, here's a man who asked.
Oh, I see.
I see.
You're making a hypocrite.
Yeah.
Well, here's the thing I've learned about that.
The Democrats are never called on their hypocrisy.
Republicans pay a price for it big time, but Democrats never do.
Of course she's being hypocritical.
Look, the biggest hypocrite when you talk about money, here's Hillary running around as a representative of women victimized by evil men who only pay them 70 cents for every dollar that men make.
And yet you go to her Senate office, and that's exactly where it happened.
Hillary paid women 70 cents for every dollar she paid men.
And here she is running around representing the women that she shafted as the one to make it right for them.
I mean, that's hypocrisy out the wazoo.
Never called on it.
But yeah, she's selling access.
She's totally associating herself with the rich and the wealthy and the powerful, all the while ripping them to shreds.
But look, Democrats have always done that.
The class warfare argument they make.
I'll never forget the 1992.
Was that it?
No.
The 84 Democrat National Convention in San Francisco.
I was sent there by a radio station to cover it.
And I remember the grand pooba of the Democrat Party at the time, the job of the hut was Tip O'Neill.
And he looked like Job of the Hut.
They had him sitting up in a balcony suite on the second row, overseeing everything happening on the stage and the floor.
And occasionally old Tip would deign to talk to the media.
And he would say things like, Yeah, we came out here to San Francisco with the blue-collar people.
We're here with the people who take showers after they go to work.
That's who we represent.
Meanwhile, the Republicans, you see them in Dallas in their limousines and their minks stalls and their diamonds and their riches and so on.
Tip, what are you?
A pauper here?
I mean, you're in San Francisco.
You gotta be one of those people who even live there.
I mean, this the Democrat Party is the party of wealth.
So, yeah, okay, Mrs. Clinton is running a totally hypocritical campaign.
She's not the first.
She's not going to get called on it.
Democrats get credit for caring about people, even the ones they are destroying.
the most amazing thing.
The Democrats, with their policies, literally damage people.
And while they do it, they get credit for helping them.
It is said the Democrats have compassion, and only the Democrats.
That they understand the plight of the little guy.
Well, they're out destroying the little guy and his plight, all the while getting credit for loving them.
It's the most amazing thing.
As to access, Mrs. Clinton is doing more than selling access.
She is selling policy, is what she's doing.
And her husband, too.
They're taking in all of this speech money, and that doesn't count the money going to the foundation and the library and massage parlor in Little Rock.
And it's all being supplied by people who think she's going to be president, who have expectations of her once that happens.
By the way, Hillary and Bill both have been paid three and a half million dollars to give speeches from corporations wanting Obama's Pacific trade deal to pass.
You think that's not being bet on the cum?
It's exactly what that is.
Three and a half million dollars for speeches from corporations that want that trade deal.
▲
Export Selection