All Episodes
Previous Next
April 15, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
April 15, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
And greetings to you once again, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plain.
Great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh behind a golden EIB microphone here at the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number, you want to be on the programs 800-282-2882.
And if you want to send an email, it's lrushbaugh at EIBnet.com.
I check those during the break.
And anytime they are worth it, I mention it.
Aaron Hernandez, the former tight end, used to be a buddy of the Gronk, Ron Gronkowski, both tight ends for the Patriots.
Hernandez convicted of murder on all counts.
And so how long will it be before the appeals process brings up the concussion defense?
Do not doubt me on this, my friends.
We haven't heard anything about this yet, but they're going to pull out all the stops because it's life without parole.
And even in the closing arguments, his lawyer decided to throw it up against the wall all during the trial.
They said Hernandez hadn't had anything to do with it.
Then during closing arguments, they decided to come clean.
Yep, Hernandez was there and saw the murder take place.
They rolled a dice.
The jury didn't fall for it.
135 witnesses.
The whole thing was circumstantial evidence, which is noteworthy because there usually is some eyewitness evidence, some sort of high-tech evidence now in trials.
This was all circumstantial.
But life without parole, that's it.
And I think that there are other trials yet to come.
But I'm not predicting it, but I won't be surprised if the appeals process delves into the fact that he might have suffered concussions and who knows what other kind of head trauma.
Because obviously he didn't do this.
It's not who he is.
That's not the kind of guy he is.
And hey, you can't blame him.
I mean, you got to throw it all against the wall in the appeals process.
We're talking about life without parole.
Let me give you a little heads up on what's coming on the program today.
Marco Rubio, this is a fascinating.
I've spent a little bit of time now analyzing his actual announcement.
I didn't watch it live.
I just can't turn on TV, folks.
I just can't.
There's too much on there that bores me.
I mean, news, the cable, I just can't do it anymore.
It's all predictable.
It's formulaic.
I know what's going to come.
And besides, I have such a vast network of helpers who think that I can't do this without them, that I get treated to email after email after email saying, you should have seen what just happened on X.
So because of this vast network, I don't have to watch it.
For example, I got a note from old buddy Jeffrey Lord at the American Spectator.
Rush, if you're not watching Brett Baer, and he knows I'm not, that's why he sends me the note.
If you're not watching Brett Baer, he led tonight with a Hillary story in Iowa.
Ed Henry, the Fox co-respondent, is in Iowa.
He interviews a young female college student who says, and I'm paraphrasing, Hillary Clinton, yeah, I think she was in the Senate or something.
I don't really know, but she must be big.
And Jeffrey's point was, in short, this was a literal confirmation of what you've been saying about the millennials and the fact that they don't know anything about the real Hillary Clinton.
They weren't alive or they weren't old enough.
They don't remember any of the things that really define Hillary Clinton.
They think of her as a senator, maybe, Secretary of State, maybe, Benghazi, don't even bother asking about that.
They won't know what it is.
Don't know about the Bimbo eruptions, don't know about Hillary Care, don't know about that miserably failed bus tour, don't know anything about Whitewater, don't know anything about the Vince Foster situation, don't know anything about the FBI.
They know nothing.
And he was just writing to tell me that I was right.
And there's even another story.
See, here we go.
This is another story that supports that very thing I have been saying about millennials.
This is a website called Vocativ.
And I don't know what it is, but our show prep here knows no boundaries.
We go wherever there is news, even to the far dark corners of the internet.
Top Google searches for Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio is the headline of this story.
What was the voting public most interested in about Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio after they both formally announced their presidential bids?
The voting public was most interested in their ages, according to an analysis of the top Google searches about both candidates.
Now, you would think that at first glance that wouldn't be good news for Hillary.
But anybody find it strange that Mrs. Clinton is out there after, she got a $14 million book advance and can't sell a book.
She got a $14 million book advance, can't sell a book, couldn't draw a crowd to a book signing.
$300,000 for speeches, each speech.
And she's out there ripping into CEO pay.
And you know what else she wants to do?
One of the four pillars of her campaign, we have to clean up the money in campaigns.
I kid you not.
We have to clean up the money.
A woman who has said that her goal, maybe she hasn't said it, but her campaign has, that their fundraising goal for this campaign is $2.5 billion.
Now, they haven't raised it.
I don't know how much they have raised, but that's their objective.
Can I just put this in perspective for you?
Do you know what the total amount of money in 2012 spent by both Barack Hussein-O, aka the one, and Mitt Romney?
The total, I'm asking for the combined total.
You are low, man.
It's $2.14 billion combined, both candidates.
Don't know the breakdown, but that's a combined total.
Hillary's goal is to raise $2.5 billion just for her campaign.
And this woman's running around saying one of the four pillars of her campaign is to clean up the money in campaign finance.
And I'll tell you what this means, folks.
You're fortunate to have me here to be able to translate this gobbledygook for you, because here's what that means.
It means if she gets elected, after we have granted amnesty to 10 to 20 million illegals, i.e., figure on 15 million new Democrat voters, we get that done, and then we reform the campaign finance system.
Mrs. Clinton will close the deal.
She'll dot the I and cross the T on officially creating a one-party United States of America.
Now, Snurdley's in there laughing, but that's exactly what the objective is.
That's why she's taking on campaign finance reform?
Are you kidding me?
A woman who wants to bust all records?
A woman who's raising money from foreign interests that we don't know what she is promising in exchange for it?
Shady alliances with this stupid family foundation that they've got.
You know, Hillary Clinton's daughter, Chelsea.
What does she do for a living?
Does anybody know?
I don't know.
I'm not.
No, I don't think she works at NBC anymore.
Anyway, she and her husband, Mark Misvinsky, I just saw this.
This is my point.
I know I'm trying to ignore them, and I can't.
Just closed or going to close or just made a bid or something on a $10.5 million 5,000 square foot condo on 26th Street in New York City.
This woman's running around just, I'm Miss Ordinary American.
I'm every, I'm just like you.
I'm like I'm riding around in a van.
Wouldn't you love to know what's going on in the back of my van?
But you never will.
I'm riding around in a van to get 16 miles per gallon.
I don't care what damage I'm doing to the environment because I'm Hillary Clinton and I'm immune to any charge.
I have a free pass.
You add all this up, and I'm telling you what she's aiming at is the cementing of a one-party Democrat Party, United States of America.
And I will develop this further.
If you doubt that, don't doubt me, but if you doubt me, I will.
Chelsea works at the Foundation for a Living.
Yes, she works at the Clinton Family Foundation for a Living, and she and her husband, I think her husband's involved in high finance, which could mean anything.
$10.5 million condo.
Fine and dandy.
You know, whatever floats your boat.
But these are the people trying to pass themselves off as just like every man when they clearly aren't.
Anyway, Google, back to this.
Google on Monday published the top five search queries about Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio after their announcements on Sunday and Monday.
And this website, Vocative, asked Google for a longer list of the most popular searches for both candidates.
And the list shows the voting public appears to be unsure about many basic facts regarding the 2016 presidential candidates, including, get this now, including whether the Democrat frontrunner is still married to Bill Clinton.
That came in at number 11 on the list of Google's top searches about Hillary Clinton.
Is she still married to Bill?
Number 11.
Maybe they can't believe she's still married to him, or maybe they've never seen him in the same photo together, maybe in the same hemisphere, and maybe that's why they have doubts.
But anyway, this story also supports what I have been saying about the millennials, which is the point, that they really don't know anything about Hillary, not the way you and I do.
They do not know that Hillary at all.
And you can't talk about Hillary.
I'm giving you some.
You can't talk about her with the assumption that millennials understand what you're talking about because they don't.
They weren't alive.
They haven't lived long enough if they were alive.
They weren't old enough.
The drive-bys have not told that story about Hillary.
It's not part of her current resume in any way, shape, man, or form.
And if the 90s is brought up, it's in the context of what a great time it was in America where she and Bill were working together to make life wonderful for average Americans, and that'd be about the extent of it.
Another thing from this article is this little passage.
You also want to know if Clinton is beatable and if this is her first rodeo suggesting that the people taking this survey don't know anything and they don't have any memory of anything.
The Benghazi circumstance ranked way down in the search survey.
You know what it was right next to?
In terms of search requests, people searching Google about these candidates and Hillary Benghazi was right next to the question, is Hillary Clinton vegan?
That's how unimportant Benghazi is to the millennials.
This is why I have been saying that the Republican presidential field has a task ahead of it, and it is to define her, but not stop at her.
They've got to define the Democrat Party.
They have to define the American left.
They have to define liberalism and include her in it.
It needs to be a massive, sweeping effort.
And they can't.
They make a grave error if they make the mistake of assuming that everybody's up to speed on who Hillary is and what she is.
Anyway, back to Rubio.
I spent some time looking at his announcement, and he's changed his big story.
He's changed a key element of his big story.
Not the details, but the emphasis.
When he tells the story of his father coming from Cuba, being very poor, working hard, raising them right, story he told at the Republican convention, he has always focused that story and aimed that story at potential entrepreneurs and small businessmen.
He's told that story with them in mind, meaning he's told his story aiming to inspire small business people, future entrepreneurs.
In this announcement speech on Monday night, he actually changed the focus.
Same story, but he aimed it at blue-collar workers, the so-called Reagan Democrats of yore, white middle-class voters that the Obama campaign acknowledged abandoning as far back as 2011.
And he also, Byron York has a story that was a couple days ago, and I just, I didn't see it till last night.
And it revives Rubio's role in the Gang of Eight, which is what got him in trouble with the Tea Party.
The Gang of Eight was going to go ahead and pass a comprehensive immigration bill, which everybody was very wary of.
This going to be just the Republican version joining with some Democrat senators of amnesty.
What Byron York dragged out, something that I had, if I had known it, I forgot it.
And so I'm not sure I ever did know it.
But Rubio, at the time, the Gang of Eight bill, when he was part of it, when it was being debated, he made a prescient prediction.
He was spot on with the prediction, which was in part an explanation for why he was participating in the Gang of Eight.
Let me sum it up before we go to the break, and we'll come back and get into more detail as the topic comes up later in the program.
But it's this.
Rubio said that if Obama does executive amnesty and grants amnesty to 10 million or 15 million or 8 million or 20 million, whatever it is,
whatever the number, if there is an executive amnesty granted to millions and millions of illegals, he said he could not envision a new Republican president being elected and rescinding it.
He said, I just, of all the things that you can see down the road in the future, can anybody think that whoever the next Republican president is would alienate as one of his first acts, as one of his first orders of business, as a new president, the rescinding of the executive order granting amnesty and thus citizenship to 10, 15, maybe 20 million people and deport them.
And he said, there's no way, I don't care who the next Republican is, a president is, is going to do that.
And lo and behold, his prediction turns out to have been right on the money, at least up to the present time.
Because there's Obama on the verge of executive amnesty, and he's waiting and waiting and waiting, and he's going to wait as long as he can.
And Rubio was saying the Gang of Eight bill was their effort to get out in front of it, make sure Obama didn't get away with doing it on the executive amnesty side and sort of get Republicans in the game.
And you know how it went.
Didn't fly with the Teeth Party.
Anyway, I'm up against it again on time, but we will be back after the breaks and uncovered.
Welcome back, my friends.
El Rushbo here, doing the job that Drive-By Media gave up doing decades ago.
At the same time, doing what I was born to do.
Dingy Harry is back at it.
Last we heard from Dingy Harry, he was explaining that some sort of elastic band on an exercise machine in his bathroom malfunctioned and left him blind in his right eye and otherwise severely injured.
Prior to that, Dingy Harry was out there suggesting that Mitt Romney had not paid his taxes for 10 years.
He's on the floor of the Senate claiming a friend of his told him that.
The media said, who's your friend?
Dingy Harry said, doesn't matter.
Media said, where's your evidence?
Dingy Harry said, I don't need any.
What you need to do is go ask Romney why he hasn't paid his taxes in 10 years.
Media said, but you don't have any evidence?
No, that doesn't matter.
The onus is on Romney to prove that he's paid his taxes.
And we've got to see his taxes.
The media dutifully went over and assumed the charge that Romney had not paid his taxes was true and began treating him as such.
Dingy Harry has now called the Republican presidential field a bunch of losers and compared Senator McConnell to a lump of coal.
This was an interview today.
What is it with all this?
What is it with this juvenile high school-like name-calling that we get from Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and Dingy Harry called Rubio a prune in Tinsel?
That's what Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz called him.
Mika Zezinski called Rubio a boy.
They call Rand Paul a woman hater.
What's this all they got?
Dingy Harry was in, who is interviewing him.
What is this here?
Well, it's in thehill.com.
I guess they did the interview.
No, it was CNBC, but he was asked about the Republican contenders.
He said, I don't really care.
I think they're all losers.
He said, McConnell, McConnell's a lump of coal.
He thinks coal is the salvation of the world.
Calling all these, I mean, childish school yard names and so forth.
And then, of course, ladies and gentlemen, my name came up.
As it tends to do now and then with Dingy Harry, CNBC squawk box.
They played a clip of the Chief Washington correspondent John Harwood's interview with Senator Reed, in which they had this exchange.
The last few days, a bunch of people are saying, Reed, he didn't have an exercise accident.
He got beat up by the mob.
It shows the credibility of Rush Lindbaugh.
He's the guy who got all this started.
Why in the world did I come up with a story that I got hurt in my own bathroom with my wife standing there?
How could anyone say anything like that?
I think a lot of people, because I read, kind of don't like me as a person.
I think that's unfortunate.
Okay.
Okay, so I'm the guy responsible for the story that Dingy Harry got beat up by the mob in his bathroom.
Now, I did offer here that I don't think he had the nature of his injuries was such that this is not the run-in with an exercise machine or the elastic band from one or whatever the story was.
I did raise the specter that it did appear to me that Dingy Harry got beat up.
I don't know by who, although I might now.
Bottom line is, I might now know who did it.
And I wasn't even going to bring this up.
But here's Dingy Harry, who seems free and clear to go lie about Mitt Romney and his taxes.
And then when asked about it, after the fact, well, he didn't win, did he?
Meaning, hey, my lie worked.
Romney didn't win.
So here's a guy who thinks that he can lie with impunity.
And let's not forget Dingy Harry's role in this whole sordid, phony soldier tale in which he attempted to have my syndication partner censor me, apologize for me, and basically impugn me and my character.
And he sent a letter, you know the story now, that we auctioned off on eBay.
It raised a total of $4.2 million, half of which matched by me for the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
And after that, Dingy Harry tried to take credit for it.
The man is a reprobate.
He's actually shameless.
Let me tell you a little story.
A couple of weeks ago now, I got an email from John Hindrocker at Powerline.
And he said that he had been in contact with somebody in Las Vegas who claimed to know what happened to Harry Reed.
And that this man wanted to tell the story to both Hinderocker and me on the phone.
And I was asked if I would join a phone call and listen to the story.
And I said, sure, but I'm not committing to using any of it.
I'm making no commitments about anything.
Everybody understood that.
So after the program, one day, a couple of weeks ago, got on the phone with John Hindrocker and this caller from Las Vegas who claimed to know what happened to Dingy Harry Reed.
Hinderocker wrote the story up and published it on Powerline back on, well, I don't know what the date is because it didn't print as per the case.
But it's just a couple, three weeks ago.
And here's the upshot of it.
Hindrocker writes on Monday, I got a phone call from a man named Easton Elliott.
We talked briefly on Monday.
We've had additional telephone conversations since then.
Elliott, with an asterisk, is a businessman who lives in Las Vegas in the area, and he thinks he knows what really happened to Harry Reid.
And this is the story that he related to us.
Here you go.
Elliot, the caller who wanted to speak to Hindrocker and me, spent a portion of last New Year's Eve at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in Henderson, Nevada, which, for all intents and purposes, is Vegas.
His AA group has meetings every hour on New Year's Eve, along with a potluck supper.
And there were about 20 people present at the meeting during the events that you will next hear about.
Sometime between 10 and 11:30 p.m., a man entered the meeting.
His appearance was striking.
There was blood on his clothing beginning around his midsection.
His left hand was swollen.
He appeared to be somewhat drunk, somewhat intoxicated, was visibly agitated.
And he wanted to share at his AA meeting, introduced himself as Larry.
In a group discussion heard by a number of people at the AA meeting, Larry said that he had just had a fight with a family member.
Larry said that he had been at a family get-together.
He didn't remember much about the fight because he had blacked out.
When he came to, he was rolling on the ground fighting with a family member, and his clothes were bloody.
And in fact, that's how he showed up at the AA meeting.
Now he said he was frightened that the Secret Service would come after him.
So here you have these people at AA meeting who don't know this guy, walks in for the first time ever, says his name is Larry.
He's drunk.
He's bloody.
His left fist, his left hand is swollen.
And he says he just had a fight with a family member, blacked out, came to, wanted to come to the meeting, and is looking at a place to hide out because he fears the Secret Service is going to be coming after him.
Now, according to the guy talking to John Hindrocker and me, the group did not take the Secret Service reference seriously.
They thought that it was just some conspiracy koop that was drunk, that wandered in and for some reason needed the comfort of an AA meeting.
Although they all did agree that it was obvious he had indeed been in a fight.
But they thought the Secret Service thing was tinhoil fat, tinfoil hat type stuff.
So this guy, Larry, stayed for the rest of the meeting and for a while afterward.
There is a front room where the AA meeting is held where coffee is served, and he remained there for a while.
And at some point during that time, he asked whether anybody could give him a ride to Searchlight, Nevada.
Now, this appearance by this guy named Larry at the AA meeting in Henderson, Nevada, was memorable as references to fighting, bloody clothes, and so on are extraordinary in that group.
It's not something that happens every AA meeting.
And the guy we were talking to, Easton Elliott, he didn't think much more about this guy, this guy Larry, until several weeks later, when he saw a newspaper story about Larry Reed, Dingy Harry's brother being arrested for DUI and assaulting a highway patrolman.
The story was accompanied by a photograph, and Easton Elliott, again, the guy talking to John Hindrocker and me, immediately recognized this Larry Reed as the same Larry who had come to their AA meeting weeks previous, who was drunk, who was bloody, who had a swollen left fist, and claimed he had been in a fight with a family member and was worried the Secret Service was going to follow him.
And then everybody said, whoa, wait a minute.
The guy who came in here who we thought was a kook is Harry Reed's brother.
So they started putting two and two together.
Because this story is accompanied by a photograph.
Easton Elliott immediately recognized Larry Reed as the Larry who had attended a meeting on New Year's Eve and they put the fact together with news stories about Harry Reid being admitted to a hospital on New Year's Day with Larry Reed's references at the AA meeting to the Secret Service.
And Easton Elliott concluded that the family member with whom Larry Reed fought with was indeed Harry Reid, his brother.
And he also knew that Harry Reed's home is within a short distance of the location of the AA meeting.
So these guys at the AA meeting, who think a kook came in, weeks later see his picture in the paper after being arrested for a DUI, and lo and behold, it's Harry Reid's brother.
So now they're starting to think they know what happened to Harry Reid, family fight, and his brother beat him up.
Larry Reid, 73, short, pugnacious guy, and it's a well-known brawler, by the way.
Subsequent research has indicated.
Now, subsequent to the news story about Larry Reed's arrest, our guy, Elliot, Easton Elliott, discussed with several others who had been present on New Year's Eve his belief that Larry was indeed Larry Reed.
Other people in the meeting recognized Larry from the newspaper photograph.
One of those who had been present at the AA meeting called Las Vegas TV station Channel 8 to tell them about Larry Reed's account of fighting with a family member.
But the TV station said they were not interested in the story.
Channel 8 Vegas said they weren't interested.
I mean, he had some AA members calling, claiming a guy came in, all bloodied, swollen hand, family fight, Secret Service after him, he feared.
Same guy arrested weeks later.
It turns out to be Harry Reed's brother.
Anyway, that's the account.
That's the story of this man who identified himself as Easton Elliott.
None of us, you know, Hindrocker can't vouch for it, neither can I.
But if what he says about the AA meeting is accurate, then the inferences seem reasonable.
I mean, if you're sitting in the AA meeting and this guy comes wandering in, you've never seen him before, he's bloodied, swollen left hand, says he just had a fight with a family member, woke up, blacked out, woke up, seeking refuge at the AA meeting, hangs around even after the meeting for coffee, claims Secret Service is after him, and a week later he's spotted in the newspaper his picture next to a DUI story.
It's Harry Reid's brother.
They put two and two together and figured out that Harry Reid was beaten up by his brother.
They tried to get a Las Vegas TV station interested in the story and they wouldn't take it.
So, bottom line, somebody attacked Harry Reid on New Year's Eve or New Year's Day.
That much seems clear from pictures and from the nature of his injuries.
Nobody's investigated this.
I don't know who else Easton Elliott called.
He claimed he wanted to talk to us because he had previously encountered both of us, Hindrocker and me, speculating that Dingy Harry had had something more happen to him, just an encounter with a rowing machine or a elliptical machine or whatever the excuse was.
As Hindrocker wrote, his investigation consisted of answering the phone.
And he posits maybe reporters who were so eager to dig through Sarah Palin's dumpster and track down Romney's haskrill classmates or to find out whether Romney had paid his taxes or not.
Maybe they swing into action and carry out an actual investigation to confirm or refute the evidence described here by Easton Elliott in the people EAA meeting.
And by the way, the man known as Easton Elliott was more than willing to come on the radio.
In fact, he wanted to.
He was more than willing to tell the story himself.
He's willing to go on TV.
He said, I'm a citizen.
I believe in God.
I feel compelled to do the right thing to tell the truth.
He said, Harry Reid can learn a lesson from me in being truthful.
He also made a point over and over saying he's not a political guy.
He's a small businessman.
He's had several businesses in the Vegas area.
Hindrocker called Harry Reid's spokesman, gave an opportunity to comment, and they didn't deny it, but they said they didn't get a comment either.
So that's the extent of our knowledge about what happened.
Dingy Harry is out now blaming me for starting a rumor that he was beaten up by the mob.
Didn't say mob, but it's clear from the pictures that an exercise machine in a bathroom did not do what happened to Harry Reid.
Is it not?
So now there's this story on the table that it was his brother Larry Reid that got in a family fight.
Anyway, got to take a brief time out.
We'll be back and continue after this.
Don't go away.
Speaking of CEOs and CEO pay, I mean, Mrs. Clinton wants to target CEO pay.
She's out there.
She's got these four pillars of her campaign.
And don't doubt me on this campaign finance reform angle.
And don't laugh.
I mean, you're going to think she's not going to get away with this hypocrisy.
I'm telling you, folks, I've got a story right here about that very thing.
Washington examiner.com, Tim Carney, this makes a great point.
And it can be summed up with basically one sentence.
Are America's Democrats really ready to put up with four years of war, corporatism, and power-hungry secrecy?
How low is the self-esteem of America's Democrats?
How in the, in other words, Hillary Clinton represents everything Democrats say they oppose?
And she does.
She's wealthy.
She seeks even more wealth.
She wants all this money to spend on campaigns.
You go down the list.
She's a warmonger at her own right.
She voted for every use of force authorization that Bush offered.
She supported the Iraq war and even a potential Iraq war when her president, her husband, was president.
She is, and this is the, it's a great point.
The Democrat Party is the party of the rich today.
The Democrat Party is the party of hedge funds.
The Democrat Party is the party of Wall Street.
The Democrat Party is the party of government and business coalitions.
It's just a game that they play and stand for the little guy.
And yet they get away with the idea that they are the little guy and stand for the little guy and take care of the little guy.
They're utter, total hypocrites.
But it doesn't matter.
The way people get screwed up, Democrats, is expecting people to hold them accountable to their words.
The Democrats don't have to be honest.
The Democrats can be hypocritical all day long if the mission is accomplished.
And the mission is defeating Republicans.
The mission is defeating conservatives.
That's all Democrat voters care about.
All the rest of this is window dressing.
They're anti-war only when Republicans are in the White House.
They're anti-Wall Street only when Republicans are in the White House.
They're anti-hedge funds and wealth only when Republicans can be blamed for it.
The mission, as far as the Democrat-based voter is concerned and of the Democrat Party, is defeat Republicans, no matter how.
Lying, hypocrisy, 180 degrees out of face in reality, all of it is tolerated and in fact applauded if they win.
Don't have to be honest, don't have to be honest with what they really believe.
Beating Republicans.
That's why Clinton remains the top star in the Democrat Party because he is viewed as the one man who has just shellacked Republicans at every turn.
That's why he's loved and adored.
Got to take a break.
Gonna get back to this CEO.
When did you hear this CEO story?
It has nothing to do with Hillary, but I'm gonna connect it, as only I can do.
So don't.
Hey, we're just getting warmed up here today, folks.
You hang in there and be tough.
The CEO story, a startup CEO has decided he's going to have the minimum wage at his company, $70,000 a year.
Details coming right up.
▲
Export Selection