All Episodes
Previous Next
April 9, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:18
April 9, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Furthermore, you want to know why this is happening now?
I'm going to tell you exactly why this happened because of Hillary's grim in gray press conference that she blew at the United Nations when they tried to redo Pretty in Pink, the Pretty and Pink press conference in 1992 or four, whatever it was, she goes to the U.N., answer this email stuff and the server stuff, and ended up being grim in gray.
She blew it, and a Democrat hierarchy started panicking, and they haven't stopped panicking, and so that's why we have now officially opened the gender war as the new season in American politics right now.
And Rand Paul is the uh the first objective, but they're gonna turn this now on every one of these Republican candidates.
They're gonna find a way to include Scott Walker in this.
They're gonna find a way to include Ted Cruz in it because this is the new season, the gender wars.
Even though it's tired, even though it's worn out, that's all they've got.
The race card, the gender card, that's it as far as the Democrat Party playbook is concerned, has been used over and over and over again.
But because we have to do anything, they have to do anything and get Hillary elected, they can't talk up her policy, so who the hell are they?
Well, they she's failed everything she's done.
They can't bring up the 90s, it'd be embarrassing to Obama.
They've got to once again try to destroy whatever, whoever Hillary's opponent, all of Hillary's opponents are going to be.
The gender wars are underway.
Now let's go back to Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, who's the uh the charwoman of the chairwoman Democrat National Committee.
She said in response to Rand Paul's question, well, I you think it's okay to kill a baby, a seven-town baby in the uterus, and she essentially said, I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved.
She does not support that.
She would, she's like every other uh extreme feminist.
She do everything she could to talk any woman who was gonna have the baby put it up for adoption out of it.
Don't doubt me.
I imagine it sounds kind of shocking, hear me say, that every abortion, every lost abortion, every abortion that does not happen is a loss of momentum politically.
It is, if it's if it's publicly known.
It's a political issue to them, folks.
Not a women's rights, that's just what they say it is.
At uh anyway, back to what she said.
Let me quote her again.
I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved, period.
End of story.
Well, there's some exceptions.
When it comes to Obamacare, how about Obamacare's contraception mandate?
We all remember that, don't we?
Women can't afford the 12 bucks a month.
For birth control pills, we have to pay it.
Even if their bills run into the admitted 1,500 to $2,000 a month range.
Obamacare, it's right there.
Contraception mandate.
How about government funding planned parenthood?
That's not what Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz said.
Government does fund planned parenthood.
But in these two examples, the Obamacare contraception mandate, or government funding planned parenthood, Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz wants maximum government involvement.
And by the way, notice that Debbie Schultz doesn't even think twice about aborting a seven-pound baby.
It didn't even give her pause.
It didn't even become a moral question to her.
She did not break a sweat.
She did not break stride when it re it reminded me a little bit.
In uh 1988, there's a presidential debate between uh the loser, uh Michael Dukakis, and George H.W. Bus.
I think it was it might have been a debate among Democrat uh candidates for the nomination.
At any rate, Bernard Shaw, then of CNN was was asking the questions as a moderator, and he posed a hypothetical to Dukakis.
And I meant to paraphrase the hypothetical.
I don't remember it exactly, but it was along the lines of uh if his wife had been raped.
What would he want done to the perpetrator or some such thing?
It was it was a question.
Yeah, yeah, what do you would you support the death penalty for uh somebody raped your wife?
It was pretty close to that.
And he didn't stop.
He didn't, he didn't he but no emotion.
I mean, we we got policy wonk 101.
Well, you know what I uh say the death penalty.
We would be very, very careful here in the death penalty of the society.
He started answering this stuff with this esoteric liberal crap, and nobody could believe it.
He would just ask basically what he thinks should happen to a man who raped his wife, it didn't matter.
Might as well have been asked if somebody had robbed a convenience store.
Now, the difference between then and now is after that happened, the drive-bys went after Dukakis and couldn't believe that he did not have one emotional tick over the question.
And then he was reduced to in uh subsequent days, trying to assure everybody that he would care deeply if his wife had been raped.
But he said that really wasn't the question I was asked.
There was a death penalty question, and I tried to stay on point, and he didn't get it.
So they tried to save himself by looking like Beetle Bailey in a tank.
Put on an army helmet there and stood up in a tank in the turret.
And it was over.
Everybody knew it was over.
They just didn't want to admit it.
Now, back once again to Rand Paul and the media, and this is now the new season of the gender wars.
Can I give you a headline from the Hill.com.
Savannah Guthrie, Savannah Guthrie fight casts shadow on Rand Paul's debut.
See how this works.
You who watched it, you're thinking he cleaned up.
You're thinking he told her what for.
You're thinking he went out there and he wasn't going to take any guff from her.
She tried to get him to do this and he just threw it right back at her.
Hill.com headline.
Savannah Guthrie fight casts shadow of uh doubt on Rand Paul's debut.
Washington Post.
Rand Paul turns prickly in media blitz after launch.
Washington Post.
Rand Paul had a bad day, and he ended it in a very grand Paul way.
You're thinking he scored big points with the question of Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and not taking the guff from Savannah Guthrie.
Look what the drive by this is on a silver platter.
Gender wars.
Even though the country is fed up with it.
What about all this love?
You know, we get gay rights and a bakery and so forth of Pizzeria, everybody talks about love.
It's a wonderful thing, and who loves who, and so when it comes to men and women, why can't we talk about love too?
Why must there always be a war presented?
And the answer to questions the only chance Hillary has.
Just as the Republican Party loves the rich and hates the little guy, the Republican Party is racist and now sexist.
Republican Party doesn't like African Americans.
Republican Party doesn't like Hispanics.
Republican Party loves CEOs, except for Tim Cook.
Republican Party hates women.
They're off and running with it.
Gender war is up and running.
Now polling data on this.
And I get I'm this all started.
It was going to happen anyway, because this is, it was predictable.
With Obama having all this insulation against any criticism because he's black, so any criticism is said to be racist and it shuts off any criticism.
You knew they're going to try to say they would Hillary, first African America, first female president, therefore you can't criticize it's all sexist.
So she goes out there at the UN with a hand-picked press corps that that everybody thinks is uh the is the second tier because uh they're the UN press corps.
And they're concerned with Darfer and Ebola and what's going on in Africa and so forth, and Mrs. Clinton said, these people have not got a thing to do, and I have an understanding at all about my email problem, so I'll use that press corps.
So the the Grim in Gray press comment, that fell apart, and they had to give her the hook and get her out of there because that wasn't going.
That started all of this.
That told them of the Democrat side we got to ratchet up the gender war even sooner than we intended.
And then from the Quinnipiac University polling unit, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's lead is wilting against leading Republican presidential candidates in three critical swing states Colorado, Iowa, and Virginia,
and she finds herself at a close race with U.S. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky in every state, according to a Quinnipiac University swing state poll that was uh since released today, I believe.
Yep.
In head-to-head matchups, every Republican candidate effectively ties her in Colorado.
And almost all Republicans effectively tie her in Iowa.
Secretary Clinton has lost ground in almost every matchup in Colorado and Iowa since a February 18th swing state poll by the independent Quinnipiac University.
One bright spot for Clinton is Virginia, where she leads all Republicans 47 to 40 over Bush compared to 42-42% tie in February.
And Jim Gardy writes about this in his morning jolt blog at National Review Online.
Uh basically adding Gallup to it.
Hillary Clinton's favorable rating from the American public currently stands at 48%, which is similar to her 50% reading last month, but it's down from 55% last summer from 59% a year ago.
What she's she's held off making her presidential announcements because she's doing paid speeches, because you know Clintons were broke.
They left the White House so destitute they had to steal furniture from the residents.
That's how broke they were.
And so they've been out there really struggling to get even to get out of bankruptcy, whatever the heck they claim they were in.
So she had to put off her presidential announcement until after all of her paid speeches had been given, and those wrapped up in March, and that's why everybody thinks that she's on the verge of announcing.
But she keeps losing.
And what's striking about this, it's usually the other way around.
Mrs. Clinton's poll numbers, you could look this up.
Mrs. Clinton's approval numbers, her poll numbers overall generally rise.
The more silent and invisible she is.
When she speaks, when she shows up, starts talking, her numbers go down.
That's record.
That's not me opining.
That's actually the case.
But now she's not out there doing anything.
Grim and Gray was the last shot we had at her.
Grim and Gray was the last shot she had at us.
Uh, and it's not going well.
She's invisible, she's not saying anything, she's making all these hires.
She hired some 33-year-old Google babe to run her campaign.
We've heard the job title for this, too.
I've taken a quick break.
And I want you to hear these guys Heileman and Halpern react to Ted Cruz rating raising 31 million.
They can't, they just can't believe it.
So sit tight, we'll be right.
Try this of CNN.
Rand Paul says he needs to hold my temper after clashes with media.
And here's more from the Washington Post.
Rand Paul's problem with female interviewers just cropped up again.
And that's three different takes from the Washington Post, and all of them have to do with Rand Paul's problem with women and the media and his impertinent impoliteness.
Dare I say, as they would call it, rudeness.
So here we have polling data that shows that Rand Paul has tied Hillary in Iowa.
And lo and behold, here comes the Democrat narrative.
The GOP's war on women and Rand Paul rude and impolite to females.
All right, to the phones we go.
Here is uh Robert in Jacksonville, Florida.
It's great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, long time listener.
First time uh first time getting through.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet, sir.
Great to have you here.
Thank you.
Um, I think Rand Paul has made a big mistake in terms of accepting this premise that uh he's quote band skinned.
Um I'm not sure if uh uh Will Blitzer put it out there, but he he definitely mentioned that in an interview with Megan Kelly.
And you know, he's missing an opportunity to come out there and explain you know show what true leadership is and what strong leadership is versus the current administration.
Well, I'm sorry, and I'll tell you, you know, the liberal media is is like you know, like teenagers.
You know, you give an itch, and they're gonna, you know, take a country mile out of it.
Yeah, yeah, I hear you on the teenager.
See them doing with this.
They're gonna keep every every chance they can to attack them, they're gonna keep doing it.
Well, now here's why.
Look, there's a there's a there's a there's a there's a theory, you know, people who are well-mannered, people that are raised well and are well-mannered.
Like I've got a story from yesterday.
I didn't get to it, gosh, I hope I saved it.
Um it's about these people that want Mrs. Clinton called Senator Clinton or Secretary Clinton, not Hillary.
And it made me think about, you know, even to this day, um I I call people who are older than me, Mr. and Miss or Mrs. I I I my uncle.
I don't call him, I always say Uncle Steve, it's just the way we were raised, sign of respect.
I was gonna do a whole little riff on that.
I'll find it.
In the meantime, what the point here is that people that are raised well, bred well, have good manners, have been taught that humility is a personality plus, that's a character plus.
And being able to admit your shortcomings is a sign of being well adjusted.
And I'm sure that's all this is.
I don't think Rand Paul is trying to persuade the media that he's a nice guy.
This is just what people with good manners do.
But politics, this is not the place for good manners.
The media does, they're not gonna be pressed by it.
They're gonna take advantage of it if they find it.
May not even know what good manners are.
I would dare say that in America 2015, the whole notion of manners is out the window.
Pop culture being what it is.
We're just in one of those cycles where all that stuff, manners and and uh polite, that's just old-fashioned stuff, you know, it's old hat.
Uh archaic, not hip, and all that.
So I think you don't want to read too much into it.
When it when he when he admits that he's uh short-tempered, he he thinks that he's uh actually being positive in the sense that he can admit his shortcomings rather than be a braggadocious oaf.
And uh deny that premise.
So I I understand it as someone who was raised well and is well mannered.
I understand it totally.
And I'm I'm sure most of you do too.
You're just probably saying, well, manners schmanners when it comes to a political campaign, which is a fight to the death with the drive-by media.
Anyway, uh I appreciate the point, Robert, and the call very much.
Here is Claudia in Long Island.
Great to have you.
I'm glad you waited.
You're next.
Um, hi, Rush.
Um, thank you for taking my call.
You bet.
Um being a woman is not a disability.
This constant protection infuriates me.
It I find it very demeaning.
You know, it is kind of contradicting in it because uh on the one hand, uh, with feminism, women are tough, strong, independent, you don't need a man, don't need anybody.
And on the other hand, poor Zavanna, she was assaulted by Rand Paul, and some male journalists have to come to her defense.
And then they say, pregnancy is a disability, pregnancy is a sickness, pregnancy is some So w I I have no lack of understanding at all about how women can be confused.
But I agree with you.
I don't women are not wallflowers.
Well, they they shouldn't be.
If they're gonna put themselves out there, then you know, uh I don't want to really be defended.
It makes me look weak, it makes me look incapable.
It makes me look like all the things I would not want to look like as I put myself out there.
I am out there to do what I do.
Mm-hmm.
And I want to look like someone who can do what she does and do it well.
Right.
And the minute someone steps in to defend me, it makes me look like all the things I do not wish to look like.
True, but that's not what this is about.
She's gladly sacrificed that for the cause, which is destroying Rand Paul's candidacy.
She will gladly allow the perception that he would mean to.
And she needs some of her counterparts and colleagues to come in, speak up for her, because he was so mean.
That advances the agenda.
That's taken one for the team.
In private, they all know who Savannah Guthrie is and what she is.
Look, Savannah Guthrie is a um she's a former trial lawyer.
Now most people know that trial lawyers are not insecure and weak.
And by the way, she was a trial lawyer for Aiken Gump, which is a huge and prestigious law firm with orifices all over the country.
She defended white-collar criminals.
So she can defend herself.
I'm sure she thinks she doesn't even need to be defended over what happened, but she'll take it because anything to advance the agenda.
Take one for the team.
You know the old slogan out there, folks.
If you can't take the heat, get back in the kitchen.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Did you hear what happened at the University of Michigan earlier?
A few people at the University of Michigan, some students, said that they didn't want the movie American Sniper shown, exhibited, or even present on campus, because it offended some students.
It offended pacifist students, it offended peace-loving students, and it offended Muslim students.
And so the university, oh, we have some people here offended.
Okay, well, uh, then we'll get rid of it.
And they announced that the movie, American Sniper, would not be allowed anywhere on campus, much less shown.
Well, the new football coach, Jim Harbaugh, arguably the most powerful man on campus, issued a tweet in which I'm paraphrasing because the tweet didn't print here in my out of my email, but he's uh tweet essentially said, you know, it's too bad.
But we love Chris Kyle.
We love the U.S. military, and we're gonna show that movie.
Wolverine football team is gonna watch that movie.
If anybody has a problem with it, too bad.
And everybody stood up and cheered.
Well, not everybody.
Anyway, the University of Michigan recanted, and they said, you know what?
We lost sight of our mission.
Our mission is openness and tolerance and expression of all points of view, and as since it was a mistake to ban the movie, we are going to reinstate the possibility.
The movie can be on campus, it can't be displayed.
But look at the the the original inclination.
I don't know how many people offended, ten, whatever it is.
Nowhere near a majority of people on that campus or in that town.
And I I almost assigned as a re- research task.
I didn't do it because I forgot about it.
I would love I don't even know if my website goes this far back to be able to find this.
I would love to be able to find the first time I actually did a bit on the offended, a now official proclaimed group, a political group known as the offended.
And if they pipe up about anything, the activity Must be stopped.
And it goes, this dates back to the early 90s and maybe even the late 80s when this program began.
And it might even have had to do with secondhand smoke.
I forget what it was, but I'll never f I have been railing against this.
Capital T Capital O. And we're we're we're governed by it now.
So many little tiny minority offshoots of the left and liberalism, and all they've got to do is pipe.
It's disturbing.
It makes it very uncomfortable.
And the people in power.
Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay.
Okay.
We'll make sure people can't drive SUVs in your neighborhood at night.
Okay, okay, we'll we'll make sure the movie doesn't show up on campus.
We don't want you upset.
And we have been acquiescing to, I mean, tiny microscopic little minorities of mountain tents.
But see, here's one guy, Jim Harbaugh.
That's all Jim Harbaugh, the new head football coach at Michigan stood up and said, the football team is going to watch the movie, and not only we're going to watch it, we love Chris Kyle.
We have respect for Chris Kyle, U.S. military.
If anybody's bothered by it, too bad.
It's all it takes is somebody stand up.
All it takes is somebody to push back in many cases.
These people will crumble.
But we don't often push back or stand up because it we don't want to be accused of being insensitive.
Or mean spirited.
Whatever the hell else kind of BS they throw at us.
By the way, memories pizza.
People have got death threats, subjected to an online hate campaign.
They're going to reopen for bidness uh, I guess tomorrow.
No.
So UK Daily, like they're open now.
The date of this thing is April 7th.
This is the nice of them.
It might have been they opened yesterday.
Anyway, they're going to reopen.
Uh they're the group that had 842 grand donated to them at GoFundMe.com.
Uh they they were uh gonna reopen on the 7th, but were advised to hold off for security reasons.
But the bottom line is they're gonna donate their money to charity, they're gonna donate the money that they they spend some of it to remodel and upgrade.
And they are going to reopen.
Now the drive-by's are totally ignoring this with all the Iran news and uh Rand Paul beating up on women news and uh so forth.
This is not getting much uh coverage, but they are reopening and giving some of the money back.
In fact, the majority of it they're giving to charity.
Here's James in Ocean City, Maryland.
It's great that you uh waited, sir.
Thank you for your patience.
Hello.
Hey Rush, how are you?
Good.
Thank you, sir.
Hey, uh, I got a question and then some follow-up statements, if you could bear with me.
All right.
Um first question is uh as we stand right now, does Iran have the ability to make a nuclear weapon?
Right now, without any U.S. involvement, do they have the ability to make one?
Everything I understand, the answer is yes.
So my my statement would be if if they have the ability to make one, why not get this deal going, and then that way we can at least mediate it in one way or another.
I know the deal may not sound good, you know, being beat up by the media every day in and out, but what do you mean mediate?
Mediate what?
Well, I mean, like like no offense but yourself, and and and no, it's like Fox.
Nobody, no Republican likes this deal because maybe it's a difference of opinion, but nobody likes Obama.
So whatever he comes up with, regardless, they're not gonna see the other side of it.
But why why is it a bad thing that we're gonna stick our nose in it?
Let's do it, and then we can have um you know, legal terms, if you will, for people to go over there and inspect, and then we can have put a hold on how much they're allowed to have and what they're allowed to do versus them having it regardless, and we have no control over what they do with it.
Why is it a bad thing?
Uh well, I mean, let me see if I understand here.
Since they can build a bomb, we should go ahead and let them build a bomb.
No, no, no, no.
I'm not I'm not saying that.
I'm saying it's a big and then inspect them.
With no U.S. involvement, They have the ability to build a bomb.
So nobody wants them to have a bomb.
I'm not disagreeing with that means by all means.
But why not, if we're going to get involved, which I believe is what Obama is trying to do, if if we're going to get involved, let's be able to mediate how fast that they can have a turnover rate or whatever that is called to deal with the actually arm bomb and then have inspectors go in there and inspect and say, okay, this facility is not capable of making nuclear weapons and so on and so forth.
Versus them just having the ability to do it.
Because they're not going to agree to a term to say, okay, yeah, we're not going to build one, then you guys can come in here and inspect and this and that.
We have to be able to say, okay, they can still kind of do it over here, but we're going to make sure that they can't.
And instead of the turnaround being going to make it six months.
How are we going to make sure they can't?
What are we going to do?
Well, if we have people over there that it's like, like they said, inspectors.
Let's have inspectors go over there and inspect.
That's more than what we're doing.
Inspectors don't do anything.
Inspectors don't they just inspect, and half the time they miss it.
But even if they find violations, they can't do anything about it other than report it.
Well, I mean, that's more than what we're doing now, correct?
In saying that the ability to do it.
No, that's not more than what we're doing now.
We've lifted sanctions.
We are enabling them to get even more material necessary to develop and enrich their uranium to weaponize it.
We're t we're saying that they're going to have one in ten to thirteen years.
Um and that uh by the little back to one the opposition to this has nothing to do with it being opposed to Obama.
Opposition to this is rooted in the concept that there are good guys and bad guys in the world and they're the bad guys.
And they are we uh the wor the Iran with a nuclear weapon is not good for the world.
It's not good for anybody in the world.
They they have not proven themselves to be in the peaceful club of nations in the world.
They are state sponsors of terrorism.
Their own words, they have promised to eliminate that country, this country.
They've promised all kinds of horrible things.
Uh but but you you you if I'm if I'm understanding you right, since they can do it anyway without our involvement, we shouldn't stop them, but we should mediate and we should inspect, and we should.
I don't know what we do when we find that they we already know they've got one.
We are facilitating them getting a bomb.
We are an essentially facilitating their quest to have a nuclear weapon.
Since you call and bring this up, I've got a couple stories on this that I think I want to share with the first one here is from the Iranian president, whose name is Hassan Rouani.
And this is from the uh Washington Free Beacon.
Iran has described an agreement to curb its nuclear program as not acceptable days after the U.S. hailed it.
So Hassan Ruani is saying that this new framework deal isn't acceptable.
Following the announcement of a framework accord, the U.S. describes a major step in rolling back Iran's nuclear work.
Leaders in Tehran began to accuse the regime of lying about the deal.
Now from Breitbart John Hayward, headline, Iran's humiliation of Obama continues, sanctions must end instantly when deal signed.
This is something new that has been discovered.
John Hayward, let me read from his piece here.
Yesterday I said that Iran was going to humiliate Obama as much as possible by tearing up his quote, historic arms control deal, unquote, in his face, one paragraph at a time, secure in the knowledge that Obama's pathological inability to admit mistakes or error will compel the regime to make excuses and try to keep the deal alive.
Boy, is that right on the mind?
The Iranians know this guy better than he knows himself.
They know he cannot ever admit error.
He's a narcissist.
It's impossible.
In his own mind, he can't ever be wrong.
In his own mind, he cannot ever have screwed up.
In his own mind, he cannot ever have made a mistake.
And so no matter what happens, no matter what happens to This deal, if it continues to get torn apart, Obama will do anything, any concession, whatever, to keep it alive because he can never arrive at the point where he would have to admit that it's a bad thing to have done.
And here's a poll quote the worst thing about this farce, assuming it ends with sanctions restored, and Obama babbling about how the Iranians messed up his beautiful deal, is that it always involved conceding legitimacy, precious legitimacy to this terror state.
Iran was not required to make any concessions in its fanaticism.
It was not required to make any concessions in its embrace of terrorism.
It was not required to make any concession in its hatred of Israel, nor even its hatred of America.
They were put on a glide path to nuclear weapons in ten years or less without agreeing to anything that would contradict the silly story they've been peddling for years about how they just want peaceful nuclear energy for civilian consumption.
And they couldn't even play nice for a couple of months and promote the fiction until they got the deal signed.
All they had to do was give Obama his little day in the sun for three months until June, but they couldn't even hold back.
They had to go out and brag that they had snookered Obama.
They had to go out and brag and say that Obama's lying about it.
They're unwilling to throw Obama even the smallest of public relations bones because they don't have to.
He is now stuck.
He cannot ever walk this back because he cannot ever admit that he might have made a mistake or his negotiators did, or what have you.
So from this day forward, whatever the truth of this thing is, is going to be made up and obfuscated by the regime because he must be covered up for.
Tom in Tempe, Arizona.
Thank you for calling.
It's great to have you on the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question.
Very simply, uh, I'd like to know where in this so-called framework or agreement or what have you.
Uh yeah.
The uh the uh there's a there's a paragraph or two or three that says that once we give uh we we do away with the uh sanctions, and the money starts flowing into uh the uh coffers of the Iranian uh leaders, uh, what precludes them from going out and buying a bomb, forget about building one.
Uh I would I would think those people are hell-bent on I I would think Obama is hellbent on having a deal, lifting the sanctions, and there'll be no snap back.
I mean, I think that's uh look Go on, I'm sorry.
No, no, that's okay.
I just I think I think we're getting a little bit deeper in the weeds than we need to get on this, where uh where Obama is concerned.
Uh Obama's not thinking about things like that.
He clearly uh Tom is not troubled with Iran getting a nuclear weapon.
He's not troubled by it.
Now he said he was in his speech in 2013 at the Brandenburg Gate in Germany, but he's done a 180 on that.
He's openly said ten years from now, 13 years from now, they're gonna nuke up that they promise they're gonna keep developing nuclear, but they're gonna stay a year away.
He's not troubled by it.
Obama is many things.
As a narcissist, as a first African-American president historic, there's this legacy, believe me it matters.
And right there on that legacy, only president, first president to strike an agreement with the nation of Iran on nuclear weapons.
It doesn't matter what the agreement is.
Of all the presidents we've had, all these so-called great presidents that we've had, Reagan, Nixon, Bush, Clinton, I don't care, you name him, FDR, who's the guy that got it done, Barack, Hussein Obama.
Who's the guy that had the guts to go about it a different way from the way everybody's going about it for a hundred years?
Barack Hussein Obama.
Same token.
Every civilized country in the world has had socialized medicine for its people for decades.
The United States was a holdout until Barack Hussein Obama, the first president to bring the United States into the 21st century by securing for its people nationalized health care, affordable health care for all Americans.
Barack Hussein Obama.
No matter whether Iran is an aggressive doesn't matter.
That's not that's Obama doesn't care about the details of Obamacare.
It doesn't give a rat's rear end.
What matters?
The only guy that did it.
Back after this.
So now Obama meeting with a Jamaican prime minister.
Says that the deal's not done till it's done.
And we won't know for the next two or three months.
What?
The deal's not done till it's done?
What happened?
▲
Export Selection