All Episodes
Previous Next
March 27, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
March 27, 2015, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host of this program are documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time.
It is great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh, on Friday.
Let's hit it.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's Open Line Friday!
Open Line Friday, and the only thing standing in your way and getting on this program is the Bo Snerdly Barrier.
Monday through Thursday, you have to talk about things I care about.
But on Friday, that's not the case.
It can be anything.
Therefore, the only thing in your way is the snurdly barrier.
And he's going to ask, he's going to make a determination whether you can actually be a good caller as he's screening your call, determining what it is you want to talk about.
He's not going to judge what you want to talk about.
He's going to judge your ability to talk about it.
Remember, this is a benevolent dictatorship here, and nobody has a First Amendment right to free speech other than me.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address, illrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Barack Hussein-O came into office claiming and promising to transform the United States of America.
And he had said on many occasions he wanted to do it in a Reagan-esque way.
Not as Reagan did, but he wanted to be as effective as Reagan.
One of the reasons the left hate Reagan is because of his effectiveness.
Reagan did, for the eight years he was in office and many subsequent years, truly transform this country.
And he did it with conservatism.
Now, the left hates that, but they nevertheless marveled at Reagan's ability to do it.
Obama's made no bones about the fact that he hated what Reagan did, what Reagan stood for, but he marveled at Reagan's ability to do it.
And we are witnessing every day the transformation of this country, be it Obamacare, be it the labor force participation rate, 92 million Americans not working but still eating, be it open borders and a welcome mat to anybody who wants to come into the country and make them instantly citizens.
No concern for assimilation because as part of the transformation of America that Obama envisions, we must dilute what is known as the American culture.
Now, previous decades of immigration were noteworthy because the immigrants that sought entry to the United States wanted to become Americans.
They wanted to participate in the land of the free, the home of the brave.
They wanted the freedom that we, as natural-born citizens, had.
So whether they came from Italy, whether they came from Poland, whether they came from Ireland, wherever they came from, they maintained their origins and their identities, but they became Americans.
They learned to speak English.
It became their primary language.
They did everything they could because they wanted to to become Americans.
That's what's out the window, among many other things.
Now there is no distinct American culture, and to the extent that there is, it is being impugned and blamed.
American culture is said to be the reason we're hated around the world.
And that's what Obama is trying to fix.
He wants us to be loved and respected and adored.
And to do that, we've got to sweep away the old America.
Racism, bigotry, sexism, homophobia, all of that, we've got to broom it.
We've got to welcome anybody who wants to come in because virtually everybody denied entry to this country probably has relatives who built it.
In Obama's world, The transformation of the United States is most recently underway in the nuclear negotiations with Iran.
And to put it in a nutshell, the manifestation of this particular transformation is the conversion of Iran to an ally and Israel away from allied status.
I think there's no other way to look at this.
Given what we see, given what we learn, given what we read each and every day, this administration is going out of its way to befriend Iran.
This administration is going out of its way to facilitate the Iranian pursuit and acquisition of nuclear weapons.
It is clear that this administration believes that Israel is the only nation in that region with nuclear weapons is a destabilizing agent and one of the reasons why there is so much discord.
And it is thought that if the Iranians get a new, hey, who are we to say that they can't have one anyway?
We don't have that right.
That's not what America's role in the world is going to be anymore, as per the Obama transformation.
This is major.
This is a huge reversal to treat Iran, the nation that has long been acknowledged the state sponsor of terrorism, worldwide sponsor of terrorism, now as an ally.
Here's a typical news story.
This is from the Fars News Agency out of Tehran.
Director General for Political Affairs at the Iranian Foreign Ministry and nuclear negotiator Hamid Badinezad said on Wednesday that the Western powers have withdrawn their previous positions in nuclear talks with Tehran.
Quote, the other side has withdrawn from its positions compared with the past.
Otherwise, we wouldn't have stood at this point and stage in the talks at all, said Baydajad to reporters on Wednesday.
The Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is to meet with John Kerry in Lausanne.
This was yesterday, and they did.
And then the Washington Free Beacon version of the story is, remember what we just heard now.
We just have the Director General of Political Affairs at the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the lead nuclear negotiator saying Western powers have withdrawn from their previous positions.
That means we've caved.
That means that we have withdrawn from the position that Iran should never have a nuclear weapon.
And now our new position is not only should they, they will.
The Washington Free Beacon headline, USA caves to key Iranian demands as Nuke Deal Comes Together.
The Obama administration giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days.
This according to sources familiar with the regime's position in the negotiations.
So in a nutshell, what we have here, the Iranians are saying that we have caved on our past demands.
The Washington Free Beacon claims to have sources who say the U.S. has indeed caved, and especially on the issue of verification.
You know, Reagan said trust but verify when dealing with the Soviet Union.
Obama's position with Iran is trust but don't verify.
Here's an excerpt from the Washington Free Beacon story.
U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession that experts say would gut the verification the Obama regime has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.
In other words, folks, we are going to lift all of the remaining sanctions on Iran before they even tell us about all of their nuclear sites.
And we are not going to demand, nor shall we be granted, any verification measures.
So this is an example of exactly what is happening.
The transformation of the United States, in this case, its foreign policy.
To be summed up, the Washington Free Beacon headline, U.S. caves to key Iranian demands as nuke deal comes together.
There's a Reuters story.
U.S. Senate voted unanimously yesterday for a non-binding amendment to a budget bill intended to make it easier to re-impose sanctions if Iran violates a nuclear deal.
This vote was 100 to nothing.
This is you total bipartisanship, unanimity, whatever, 100 to nothing for the amendment sponsored by Republican Senator Mark Kirk, which would establish a fund to cover the cost of imposing sanctions if Iran violated terms of an interim nuclear agreement that's now in effect.
The Senate also passed a non-binding amendment to compensate American victims of the 1979 Iran hostage crisis.
So the Senate knows full well what Obama is doing, and they're doing whatever they can to mitigate the damage that Obama and John Kerry are doing.
Let's go to the audio soundbites.
Last night on Megan Kelly's show on the Fox News channel, the former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton was a guest.
The question: you really think the Iranians are going to hold it against us?
We're kind of backing this Saudi thing against the Iranian folks in Yemen because we're working with the Iranians against ISIS in Iraq.
So it's like, you know, one hand does one and the other hand, and I'm sure the Ayatollah is going to understand, right?
Look, the Iranians are playing us for fools.
They have taken us to the cleaners on these negotiations over the nuclear program.
We are now functioning in effect as the air force for the Shia militia in Iraq.
The government of Baghdad is, like the Alhouti, effectively a surrogate for the Ayatollah's.
Let me translate this for you.
The government of Yemen has fallen.
The Saudis are nervous as they can be over Iranian expansion here.
They're also nervous as they can be over ISIS.
The end result of this is that the United States has actually joined forces with Iran, providing air power, to beat back ISIS.
And that is what leads Secretary Bolton to claim that the Iranians are playing us for fools and that Obama thinks terrorism is not a threat.
You know, that could be true.
I don't know.
How does a reasonable person believe that terrorism is not a threat?
But on the one hand, we have this regime and they are hell-bent on saying that there isn't any extremism, there isn't any terrorism.
All there is is extremism in the name of Islam.
But we do not really have any militant Islamic terrorism out there.
They are hell-bent on that point of view, and they recite it as often as they can.
Obama does it.
John Kerry, Marie Harf, the Valley Girl, the State Department, they all say it.
And the question is, do they really believe that?
Do they really believe that terrorism is not institutional?
That it's just an aberration?
It's an extremist offshoot.
And that we don't need to gear up against terrorism per se.
We just need to have a means of dealing with a little uprising over here, such as in Nigeria, a little uprising over here, such as in Afghanistan.
So I think Bolton is speaking in quasi-diplomat speak here when he says that Obama thinks terrorism is not a threat.
But we have joined forces with Iran.
And it's the strangest name, and the Saudis are scared to death of it.
The Saudis don't know what to make of us.
The Saudis are going to war on their own, and they don't have much of a military.
You imagine if the Saudis despite this, scared to death of the Iranian.
The Iranians want the Saudis out of business.
The Iranians want the Saudis' oil fields.
This is Shia versus Sunni.
There is no great love.
In fact, there's great enmity between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Our ally, prior to Obama, has always been Saudi Arabia.
Now we are allied with Iran on this business with ISIS in Yemen, and the Saudis are just beside themselves.
Totally flummoxed and unprepared for it.
Here is more Bolton.
Megan Kelly said, you know, it just seems like aren't we all on different sides of the conflict depending on what country we're talking about?
And isn't the truth that Yemen is nowhere close to a success?
I mean, the regime's out there talking about Yemen is one of the great success stories, but it's not, is it?
Well, let's not forget Somalia either.
The president named two countries.
The government in Yemen has collapsed.
The state has ceased to exist.
Somalia has not had an effective government in 25 years.
So I think the president is still following the ideology that terrorism is not a threat.
Now, this morning on CNBC on SquawkBucks, former Governor Bill Richardson, Democrats New Meiko, and Joe Kernan, who's the co-host, said, okay, look, Governor Richardson, when you were at the UN, did you think the day would ever come when we would tell Israel we're not going to back them with a veto of certain resolutions?
Did you think that we would be sitting here with Iran, sort of friendlier with Iran than we do with our oldest ally in the Middle East, Israel?
No, it's inconceivable.
When I was at the UN, the vetoes I cast were always for Israel.
Now the two-state solution is possible that we'll back in the Security Council a two-state solution.
So it's totally inconceivable what's happening right now in the Middle East.
We're trying to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran.
We're on the same side as Iran in Iraq against ISIS.
The Saudis are now becoming military regional players.
The situation is so volatile, so explosive.
It's not just a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
You've got al-Qaeda, you've got ISIS, you've got a huge, huge battle for influence.
Now, this guy is a, I mean, he's a down-the-middle liberal.
He makes no excuses for it.
He's full-fledged, 100% card-carrying.
And even he can't believe what he's seeing.
It's inconceivable that we are on Iran's side.
Inconceivable to me that we have sided with Iran over Israel.
Something he never ever thought he would see.
So the next question was: well, obviously, Netanyahu would take issue with the notion that this is a good deal.
Is it a good deal, meaning the deal with Iran's a good deal for the United States?
It remains to be seen.
There's only a few days left.
I'm a little concerned.
I think the nuclear deal, I was with the energy secretary the other day.
He's a nuclear scientist.
The nuclear reduction, which I had wanted it to be, the ending of their nuclear capacity.
You know, I've been a backer of the administration.
But on this one, I don't know where I'm going to end up.
Well, we all know where this is going to end up, Mr. Richardson.
That's what's frightening about it.
We all know.
Back to the phones we go on Open Line Friday, somewhere in Washington State.
This is Rob.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Hello.
Thank you so much.
God bless you, Rush, for taking my call.
I've been a Rush baby since 1988 and developed quite well listening to your show.
And to get to the point, I also started my county job at that time.
And on Thursday, December 18th, there was an all-staff meeting where I was informed that OpinionAid Talk Show radio stations, specifically you, would not be disruptive and was instructed not to play it anymore, and it is prohibited.
And I asked for that in writing, and they gave me it in written form.
And it says, I'm not going to mention the county, but they're directed to refrain from playing or listening to OpinionAid Talk Show radio stations during work hours.
It's been determined to be disruptive to the environment.
To clarify, staff member may opt to listen to this on their breaks in your car with your windows rolled up.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
I'm not catching on.
Are you saying that you could?
They granted you permission to listen to it in your car if you had your window rolled up.
Only on my break.
Only on your break during work hours.
Correct.
Never in the office.
Ever.
Ever.
Never, ever in the office.
And only during the workday on break in your car with the windows rolled up so nobody else would be disturbed.
Correct.
But this is the disturbing part, Rush.
Warning.
Failure to abide by this directive will be considered insubordination and therefore will be subject to violator to disciplinary action.
So they were telling you they could fire you if you violated this dictate.
Exactly.
And how long ago was this?
Specifically you.
Yeah, but how long ago did this, how long ago did this happen?
December 18th.
Wow.
December 18th, just after the elections.
Two, I had a two-week vacation after this.
I'm coming up on a break.
Is there more to this story, or is that pretty much it?
Well, my choice is, I'm a loyal listener to you.
Hang on, hang on.
That says we're going to take a break here.
We'll get the remainder here when we get back.
Okay, now we're back with Rob somewhere in Washington State.
Okay, so December 18th, you got a directive.
You work for the county, an unnamed county.
You don't want to name the county.
You work for the county.
They told you no longer can you listen to talk radio, particularly the Rush Limbaugh program during work hours, only on a break, and only if you're out of the office in your car with the windows rolled up.
Is that about it?
You're spot on.
All right.
Now, what about other radio stations?
Can employees during work hours listen to, say, all-God radio?
Can they listen to top 40 radio?
Can they listen to Chinese opera?
Can they listen to whatever they want to listen to?
Yes, sir.
They can?
Sure.
They can?
So the radio can be on in your office to anything except me.
Right.
So what did you do?
Well, my life has never been the same, Rush.
I don't know really what to do.
I feel violated and discriminated, and I can't.
It's hard to go to work now.
I just feel like I'm I don't even know how to explain it.
I mean I understand how you feel.
Everybody else can listen to whatever they want.
Right.
I don't know.
I don't even, I'm so glad you took my call because I can't express truly how I feel besides majorly violating it.
It doesn't seem like I'm in America.
That's what the letter I, or the email I said, goodbye, America.
I don't know if you read it, but I just don't even know where I'm at anymore.
I mean, how can someone of that stature dictate what goes into my ears, you know?
Well, that's the thing.
A business can run itself the way it wants.
The First Amendment doesn't apply there.
It's a state government.
That's true, Bob.
I forgot this is a state government.
The U.S. Constitution might, well, I don't know.
You might be able to win this depending on if you wanted to take it on.
I don't think you would view it as worth it to do that.
Because even if you did win it, they'd see to it that you're not there.
Absolutely.
But I understand you feel like a family member has been kicked out of the house.
And this family member you like.
Well, I've been imprisoned in my mind.
So I'm not allowed to enjoy simply things that I'm being educated by you on a daily basis.
Well, let me ask you this.
Did you have the radio on when you were listening to this program?
Was it too loud?
Was it, say, offending the sensibilities of, say, some fragile liberals that might be in the office?
Could they hear it while you had it on?
No, the original meeting came directly after another meeting that didn't really go all that well for everyone.
And it was immediately after that meeting that this was brought up.
Two meetings about this.
Wow.
In the same day.
After the first meeting was broke and we were done, we were all regathered with a separate smaller crew without bigger people there.
And the immediate staff was people I work with.
That's when the directive was verbally given that no more Rush Lima in the shop.
Well, why?
What was going wrong in there?
What was happening because I was on the air in there?
I don't know.
We've listened to you for 20 years.
You know, it probably found you to be in too good a mood most of the time.
You're probably sitting there laughing now and then.
You clearly were enjoying yourself.
That is.
Yeah, exactly.
Believe me, that's enough to offend a liberal.
I'm not making that up.
If you enjoy yourself, that could be one of the problems.
They were offended.
But if you didn't have it up loud enough that neighbors could hear it, then what's the big deal?
Right.
Well, there had to be something that precipitated this, Rob.
It just didn't happen out of nothing.
What caused this?
What made the people that run the office become aware of this?
Well, I have my personal opinion that it's just another way to kind of get at me specifically.
Okay, so they've got it in for you to begin with.
That's my gut instinct.
So what are you going to do, Rob?
Well, that's why, you know, I feel like I'm if I'm in a marriage with you and I'm being told I can't be with my partner anymore.
Oddly enough, I listen to you in secret places, which is jeopardizing my future.
Now, just so people, you are married, right?
No, I'm not.
I'm a single guy.
Oh, so you are married to me in this show.
Okay.
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
My marriage to you and my loyalty.
Yeah, I appreciate that.
I really do.
I'll bring the condoms.
Well.
I can't believe it.
I got on the air, but I had to have you hear it for yourself because I am at my wit's end to even know what to think.
Oh, I can tell you what to think about it.
That's not a mystery.
You're dealing with flat-out anti-conservative discrimination in your office.
Flat-out anti-rush discrimination.
They're just afraid to hear it.
You're probably enjoying yourself.
They don't like that.
But they don't want to subject themselves to this.
They're the ones bothered by it, offended by it, taking it out on you.
And they're probably of the mindset that you're not going to do any about it.
You're not going to challenge them on it.
And you'll just obey.
But I know that you're not going to give up the program.
You and I are not going to get a divorce.
I'm fairly confident of that.
Yours is not the first example of this, but it's been going on for the longest time.
Rob, the way you have to look at this is it's a pain in the butt for you for the eight hours at work, but what this really is, is a testament to the effectiveness of this program.
You have to smile.
You have to smile inwardly and outwardly.
And you have to know here that they did this because this program bothers them.
And it bothers them because it challenges the little cocoon that they've constructed for themselves to live in.
And so they're behaving like tyrants, and that's who they are.
They're little miniature dictators, and you have fallen under their ability to wield power on you.
By the way, AP News Alert, Dingy Harry has just endorsed Chuck Yu Schumer as his successor.
Now, by the way, Harry Reid's announced his retirement, but he's not leaving.
He's got as much time left as Obama does.
So a year and three quarters, when that's 20, 21 months he's got left.
So Obama and Dingy Harry can still wreak terror and a lot of damage before they're out of there.
There was a move I saw earlier today.
Some people had already began to put pressure on Dingy Harry to name Elizabeth Warren as his replacement.
Not kidding.
Not kidding.
And I saw the story and I said, there's no way that Schumer is going to put up with that.
No way is Schumer going to sit idly by and let Elizabeth Warren become the new Senate leader for the Democrats.
So Dingy Harry has endorsed Chuck Yu, and that pretty much means that Chuck Yu is going to be the guy.
Given seniority and the power structure in there.
Rob, I appreciate the call.
Thank you much.
Scott, Fort Wayne, Indiana, you're next at Open Line Friday.
Hello.
Hi.
Thanks, Mr. Snerdley, for taking my call.
Yeah, you beat the Snerdley barrier today.
You should feel good about it.
That's a beautiful thing.
I just got a few things, and I'm not exactly sure how to tie it all together, so I wanted to kind of lay it on you and just ask for your feedback.
Okay, cool.
Go ahead.
All right, okay.
So, first of all, I want to say that I have absolutely no interest in these social issues that dominate the Democrat and Republican establishment, Republican parties.
I'll never vote that way again.
But the thing I'm calling about really is I went to school at Ivy Tech Community College in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
In my business 101 class, our textbook taught us actually that the trend in the world right now, nations that have been typically socialist or communist are coming back towards capitalist values, capital systems because they found that too much socialism is bad.
They taught that nations that is like the U.S. have been traditionally very capitalistic are moving back left towards the center because too much capitalism is bad.
And so they're trying to find this perfect balance of, you know, government, I guess.
And I just feel that we've lost all our power to the government.
I mean, you think about our national debt.
It's like they're purposely taking us over a cliff.
These are supposed to be the best and brightest people that we have to offer in the United States.
And look at our national debt.
I mean, they don't know.
I've kind of lost my place.
I'm nervous.
I'm not talking on the phone.
No, your instincts on this are correct.
Well, let's review what your course taught you there.
If I heard you right, what you said was that this, what was this course 101?
Scroll.
Business class business one.
Okay, the rest of the world has tried socialism and has seen that it's failed and they're moving back towards capitalism.
But the U.S. is doing the opposite and is moving more toward the center towards socialism, pulling up just short of communism.
And that was one point that you made.
And that alone is interesting to discuss because there's some truth to it.
There is some truth, particularly the direction we are headed.
There's no question that the power structure in this country today is aiming its fire at capitalism.
And they're doing everything they can to inflict damage and to impugn it, destroy the credibility of capitalism.
And we're heading down that path full speed.
Now, in other parts of the world, depend on what parts of the world you're talking about.
Europe goes back and forth on this.
They're constantly in flux.
The problem with it is in the real world, socialism never works, and it never has.
And it never will.
It's not that the right people haven't yet tried it.
It's not that we haven't spent enough money.
Good Lord, we've spent $18 trillion in this country trying to create a utopia.
It's like I said the other day, $18 trillion and one-third of that in just the last six years under Barack Hussein-O, all for the express purposes, supposedly addressing all of the grievances that all of the minorities and all the roughshod and all the downtrodden have had.
Obama has done his level best to pay back people who he thinks have been given the shaft since the founding of this country.
And as I look out over the national landscape, I see more anger than there was six years ago.
I see more misery than there was six years ago.
I see less happiness than there was six years ago.
I see more unrest.
Culture and society is more volatile than it was six years ago.
It's nothing new.
We had upheaval in the 60s.
We've had race riots prior to Ferguson.
All this stuff is, it's happened before.
This is one of the frustrating things that every time something like this happens, we have gone out of our way to, in one way, shape, manner, or form, pay reparations.
We've never done that by name, but we've always gone out of our way to address the grievances of these minority groups, name it, whether by grievance by race or whether they're minority by number or what have you.
And no matter what we do, they're never happy.
No matter what, there's never a thank you.
There's never any satisfaction.
The reason is it doesn't work.
You cannot create utopia.
It's not possible.
It is humanly impossible.
And yet people continue to try it.
And the reason that they continue to try it is because it's the fastest way to cement themselves in power.
They don't need it to work.
In fact, that's the real indictment of these people.
They know it isn't going to work, and yet they do it anyway because it's totally selfish.
It's the fastest way to enrich themselves.
It's the fastest way to consolidate power for themselves.
The very people they claim to be looking out for, the very people they claim to be representing, are the biggest victims of their supposed compassion.
And yet they don't pull back.
They keep adding on to it.
You would think after all this money, you would think after all of the grievances that have been addressed, you would think that all the attention's been paid, all the promises that have been made.
You would think there'd be some measure of satisfaction, some measure of happiness, some measure of contentment, but there isn't.
It's worse.
So it's never going to work.
It is impossible.
It never has worked.
The most prosperous nation in the history of humanity is this one.
And that happened when it was, for the most part, full-fledged capitalist.
This is resented by the left for a whole host of reasons we've been through over and over again.
But your basic point about the debt is tied right into this.
And it's why so many people are unsettled.
And the very thing that's happening here, this nation was founded on the concept that the American people are whom the nation's built around and for.
The nation was founded on the concept of individual liberty and freedom.
And that flies in the face and is a great threat to socialists and totalitarians.
And one of the fastest ways to take away liberty and freedom is to go in debt to the point that people have to pay so much in tax that they can never ever accumulate any real wealth.
I know.
I know.
We got to take a break.
Back to the phones we go.
Open Lion Friday.
This is Nicole in Fort Laramie, Wyoming.
And Nicole, it says here that you are 12 years old.
Is that right?
Yes.
Well, it's great to have you here on the program today.
Thank you so much for calling.
You're welcome.
So what's up?
What's happening?
Well, I just wanted to thank you for writing the book, Rashvi Virgin and the American Revolution.
Well, you're welcome.
I am happy to hear that you liked it.
I loved it.
What did you like about it?
Well, I liked Rashvi Virgin Liberty and Cam and all the kids.
So you can relate to the characters.
My guess is that the talking horse Liberty, you kind of gravitate to Liberty.
Smart Alec, but he's the guy that gets them where they need to go, and you just like the guy, right?
Yes.
Well, what about the story?
The story of the American Revolution, did that resonate with you?
Did that make an impact on you?
Yes.
Well, that's good.
I'm so happy that you like the book.
Have you read any of the others or just that one?
No, I don't have them.
You don't have the other one.
You just have the most recent one.
You don't have the first two.
Oh, well, we got to do something about that, Nicole.
You can't just have one of them.
You have to have all three.
Yeah, you need to have it.
I'll tell you what, I want to, hold on here.
I'm going to have Mr. Snerdley get your address if your parents will give us permission.
And I'll send you the first two books so you'll have those.
We'll send you some audio copies too on CD so that you can listen to me read those books.
Maybe when you get tired of reading yourself, you can experience them a different way.
But I'm really glad that you made it through.
I'm really happy that you like the book.
And stand by, don't hang up, so we can get the first two to you.
No, I didn't hear her say that.
Did she yell at her mom that there were two other books?
How cool.
Folks, the time is just zipping by here.
I have a lot of things here in this stack that I was really looking forward to getting to.
And I'm going to have to do that this next hour.
I'm going to zip right through them.
So I'm going to be speaking fast.
You've got to be prepared to listen fast.
▲
Export Selection