All Episodes
Previous Next
March 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:43
March 16, 2015, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
It's a rebound.
Greetings to you music lovers, thrill seekers, and conversationalists all across the fruited plane.
Time for broadcast excellence, Rush Limbaugh back at it here at the Excellence and Broadcasting Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, the telephone number if you want to be on the program 800-282882.
The email address Lrushbow at EIBNet.com.
Thanks to Eric Erickson for sitting in here on Friday.
I appreciate that.
But we're back here and uh and ready to go.
And boy, folks, let me tell you what, when Mrs. Clinton, Yoga and all, went to the United Nations last week for that for that ill-timed, ill-fated uh Pretty in Pink 2 type press conference.
Boy, did I nail it, and I don't mind saying so.
I spent a lot of time, because I know a lot of people in the audience today might not have been in this audience, but simple math.
Dates of birth and all that, uh, might not have been old enough for even listening back in 1994 when Hillary did the Pretty in Pink, and the uh the thing she did at the United Nations was a was a repeat, an attempt to replay the way the Clintons got themselves out of jams back in the 1990s.
And I, L. Rushbaugh, focused on that because I was the cause of the Pretty in Pink press conference.
And lo and behold, none other than the Nueva Ortic Times has so written.
Story that ran on March the 14th.
A young manager for Clinton juggles data and old baggage.
Get this now.
This is a New York Times on MSNBC last week, 70-year-old James Carville, denounced the coverage of his old buddy Hillary Rodham Clinton's use of a personal email account at the State Department ticking off twenty years worth of scandals surrounding the Clintons that he attributed to an irresponsible news media.
Mr. Carville complained to the host, Andrea Mitchell, NBC News Washington, that he had lived through this.
You remember Waiwata, you member Foulgate, you member Travelgate, you remember Pardongate, member Bangazi member, all that, and where'd my gumbo?
Well, meanwhile, far from the television lights, Robbie Mook, the 35-year-old who is likely to manage Mrs. Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, kept his head down and worked the phones from his standing desk to build a field operation in Iowa, set up technology to collect data to target voters and hire a campaign staff in a handful of key states.
Now, all of this happened.
Dare I say it, after I pointed out Mrs. Clinton and her team seemed to me to be stuck in the 90s.
And let me give you some pull quotes from the New York Times story.
Ultimately, the strategy they settled on, having Mrs. Clinton publicly address the controversy on Tuesday, harked back to the approach used in 1994, when Mrs. Clinton, wearing a blush-colored sweater set, held a lengthy news conference to address the Whitewater inquiry and a 1970s commodities trade in Arkansas.
Comparisons quickly erupted.
Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh said Mrs. Clinton is stuck in the 90s.
The next day, says the New York Times.
The operation took its first coordinated step toward wrangling the Clintons old friends and former age like Carville and moving them out of the way.
Mrs. Clinton's now 31-year-old press secretary Nick Merrill hosted a conference call with about 25 farforting.
Anyway, the point of the story is after I pointed out, now this is they don't actually say this, but the timeline gives it away.
After I point out that Mrs. Clinton seemed to want to replay the 90s and seemed to be stuck in the 90s, the New York Times does a story the next day claiming because of that they are moving younger.
They are trying to millennize, as it were, and and uh and modernize.
And you know, it was just last week we were talking about how Hillary has been hiring all of these old retreads from their former lives in the White House.
Nobody young, no new blood, no new ideas.
And Carville, and he's still out there, by the way, and you want to hear why they're making the change.
Did you happen to see, you probably did, I don't know anybody who watches it anymore.
Did you see this week yesterday on uh on?
Yeah, it's still on.
Here's the thing, though.
The host of that show is George Stephanopoulos.
Now, back in the 90s, George Stephanopoulos was one of the members of the war room.
He was partnered with James Carville, and they sat in what was called the war room.
And the purpose of the war room was to destroy anybody who came up with any criticism that might stick against the Clintons.
And they made a documentary about it.
It was part of their campaign in 1992, and they took it with them to the White House, and it was called the War Room.
Well, now one of the members of the war room is a journalist over at ABC News, and he was interviewing the other member of the war room, James Carville, yesterday.
This speaks for itself.
George Stephanopoulos talking to former war room buddy James Carville said.
What has the Clinton camp taken away?
Now, let me preface this by pointing out, reminding you again just how scared I believe the Democrat Party is.
Her book tour was an absolute bomb.
This thing, this United Nations press conference did not happen on a vacuum.
Her book tour was an abject bomb.
Nobody showed up.
She makes no connection with people.
Her book sales were an absolute bomb.
There is none of the accompanying excitement about who everybody seems to think on the Democrat side's an ex president.
People like that draw crowds.
People like that create enthusiasm across all demographics.
Mrs. Clinton didn't draw a crowd.
Nobody bought her book.
She shows up at this UN press conference looking, well, like she done conducting herself like 20 years ago.
And they're worried.
So they send Carville out.
Now, listen to this answer.
Question from George Stephanopoulos, former war room member.
This is a guy who used to, I find the irony here.
I mean, here's a former war room member who worked with Carville to destroy Clinton enemies, is now on ABC asking his former war room buddy, what has the Clinton camp taken away from all this, meaning the UN flub and that bad press conference and all that.
What this is is the latest and a continuation.
And if you take it all and you put it together, and you subtract 3.1415 from pi, you left with not very much.
And that's what at the end of the day, so Republicans can't pass a budget.
All right, we got another investigation, just like we had to Whitewater, just like you go through to Foul Gate, you go through Travel Gate, you go through seven or eight different congressional committees.
And you wonder why the public is not following this?
Because they know what it is.
All right, what this is is the latest in a continuation.
And if you take it all and you put it together, you subtract 3.1415 from Pi.
You are left with not very much.
This was incoherent.
This was wandering aimlessly for a structured thought.
And all the guy could do was go back to the 90s and revive what it was that worked then in terms of defending the Clintons.
That all these people that watch this show, Watergate, Whitewater, Travelgate, File Gate.
You don't know what that is yet.
Some of the audience does, obviously, but some of the millennials have no idea what File Gate is.
They don't know what Whitewater was.
They have no idea what Travelgate was.
They have Zilch Zeronada.
The media doesn't talk about these things, and it's not taught in their in their history textbooks and school.
So we still have a lot of educating to do.
So that was the first answer, the first part of the answer, and then he continued with it.
And this this is a mistake that the old Carville would never make.
He gave up the game.
He actually admitted why Hillary is hiding her emails.
It was something that she did.
It was legal.
I suspect she didn't want Louis Gomut rifling through an emails, which seems to me to be a kind of reasonable position for someone to take.
So it amounts to just like everything else before it.
She just admitted that she did what she with his private server and the private email domain.
He just admitted that she did that to avoid congressional oversight.
Now, the Carvel of 20 years ago would not make this kind of blunder.
This was a tandem.
Mrs. Clinton is running around trying to say, no, no, no.
I was not trying to hide name from anybody.
I want people to read my emails.
Why, here are 30,000 of them right now.
By the way, I have a question for you.
Mrs. Clinton printed out 30,000 plus emails, sent them over to Justice Department after claiming we've gone through all 60,000 and this is it.
There's nothing in there that uh just trust me, the 30,000 emails we're keeping, it's all private, just me and Bill going back and forth, even though Bill says he's only sent two emails at his life.
Yeah, and it's just me and Chelsea and it's uh Bill, and you know, Chinese donor here, what we promised.
I'm no, no, sorry, not that.
Uh there is no email from a Chinese donor in that's my point.
We've searched, and there aren't any emails from Chinese men.
And trust me, and here the 30,000, and you can see there's now the Justice Department has said it's going to take maybe a year, several months to go through 30,000 emails precisely because Mrs. Clinton printed them out.
There's no keyword search, there's no way to do an advanced search, keyword or otherwise, to try to put anything together.
It's all going to have to be done manually, read manually, marked up manually.
How did Mrs. Clinton go through 60,000 emails in a matter of days?
And the DOJ says it's going to take them months.
So you put all this together, and the bottom line is they're stuck in the 90s.
The Democrat Party's worried about it.
The New York Times does a story on that very fact after I mentioned it.
Then they make a big deal of Clinton's duel, going out and hiring a bunch of millennials now to run their high-tech end.
And Carville goes on TV yesterday and admits that the whole reason Mrs. Clinton did this was to avoid congressional oversight.
That is a boo-boo.
That is an error that uh Carville would not have made.
Uh, way back then.
Well, I know it was pie day.
It was 3.1415, but but the millennials don't know what pie day is.
I don't know, Carville maybe trying to relate to him.
Haven't anyway, uh it's and that we have a little bit more.
Remember last week, ladies and gentlemen, I had heard, and I'd passed on to you that the uh it was it was it happened during a a phone call.
We had a phone call from somebody who thought that the uh the whole reason Hillary was doing this was to set the Republicans.
I remember that call snurly, you gave it to me.
This guy called and he said, you gotta be very careful here, Rush.
I think the Clintons did this on purpose.
They're sitting there, but there's nothing in those emails, Rush.
And it's set up that way.
Republicans would be very careful because they're gonna make a big deal out of this, and they're gonna start speculating about what kind of bombshells they expect to find in there.
After all, it's a Clintons, and they're gonna go through all these emails, you're gonna find out there's nothing there, it's a Clinton setup.
And I said, wrong oh.
I said, this is the regime doing this.
I said, this is Valerie Jarrett, this is Obama attempting to sabotage Mrs. Clinton.
Lo and behold, in the New York Post yesterday, Ed Klein had a story, a little article.
He's written a lot about the Clintons books and so forth, and nobody ever denies his stuff.
His uh his most recent book is Blood Feud, The Clintons versus the Obama, published by Regnery.
Nobody refutes Klein's stuff.
The uh the Clintons and the Obamas try to say he's a kook and an oddball, and they try to attack his credibility, but they dev they never refute what he actually says.
And Ed Klein came along yesterday and said that it is indeed Valerie Jarrett who is behind the leak of the information that has led to The Hillary Clinton email scandal.
In other words, it's a vast left-wing conspiracy.
Valerie Jarrett leaked to the media details of Hillary's use of a private email address during her time as Secretary of State, but she did so through people outside the regime, so the story couldn't be traced to her or the White House, even though Klein seems to have done it.
In addition to that, at the behest of Valerie Jarrett, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary's conduct at the State Department, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders, and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.
There are six separate investigations into Hillary's performance.
They've been going on at the State Department for some time now.
And Ed Klein writes that he was told that the email scandal was time to come out just as Hillary was on the verge of formally announcing that she was running for president.
And furthermore, Ed Klein was told that there's more to come.
On what I don't know, and about what I don't know.
And then Klein says that members of Bill Clinton's camp, and you gotta wonder who those people are.
Who are in Bill Clinton's camp these days?
How many women are in that camp, for example?
Members of Bill Clinton's camp say that the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.
Klein writes, quotes one of Bill Clinton's friends here.
My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they've been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us.
The Obamas are behind the email story, and they're spreading rumors that I've been with women that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who've done favors for our foundation that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.
That's all quoted, attributed to Bill Clinton.
And then Clinton added, supposedly the Obamas are out to get us any way they can.
And that is markedly different from the 90s.
Back in the 90s, there weren't any Democrats trying to get the.
I mean, the Democrat Party loved and adored him.
It is clear the Democrat Party is spooked.
Some elements of it.
And I'm telling you, you won't hear much about this, but her bomb of a book tour was the first and maybe still the biggest red flag.
Well, I think her foundation, the money and these foreign donors and the privacy of the email, that's a big red flag as well.
Point is it is not the slam dunk.
Everybody has been led to believe it's going to be.
All right, now the absolute latest on this is that the Hillary Clinton camp late yesterday issued a significant clarification about the steps they say were taken to review thousands of personal emails before they were deleted, claiming her team individually read every email before discarding those deemed private.
And again, we're just going to have to accept their word.
I'm going to do it.
For what we don't need to see.
Stuff that's private and irrelevant, they've gone through it, all 60,000 emails, and we are to trust them.
Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill made the clarification of Rittman statement, a written statement to Fox News, which it came after a former Secretary of State's office revealed last week that while more than 30,000 work-related emails were turned over to the State Department, nearly 32,000 were deemed private and deleted.
This admission raised questions over how her team decided to get rid of those messages.
Here's the thing.
Just to repeat the State Department said it's going to take several months.
And the investigators say that it will cost more than millions of dollars to go through Hillary's 33,000 emails.
And yet we are supposed to believe that her tiny personal staff went through twice as many emails in little more than a month.
October 28th to December 5th of last year.
That's when Mrs. Clinton's staff went through the emails.
Now, I don't know how they can do that.
I don't know how her staff can go through all of these emails.
They had to read each one.
And then determine which ones were public and which ones were private, and we don't have a right to see.
And furthermore, we are to trust them.
And the Justice Department says it's going to take them several months to read half of the emails.
About 33,000.
And cost millions of dollars.
Now clearly, somebody's not being straight with us here.
It's either the Clintons not being straight with us when they tell us they've read all 60,000 or the DOJ not being straight with us by telling us it's going to take months to read half of them and cost millions.
Somebody here is lying.
And when the Clintons are involved in something, you can make book on the fact that somebody in the equation is not telling the truth, and here we go again.
Folks, I'm sorry, I've been engaging in verbal dyslexia here.
I've been saying Justice Department, investigating Mrs. Clinton's emails.
State Department is what I meant to say.
And I've been saying Justice Department.
I associate justice with law enforcement.
I don't know why.
But I do.
And since we're talking about enforcing the law in Mrs. Clinton's emails, I just got kind of confused out there.
But it's the State Department that is investigating Mrs. Clinton's emails.
Now I also checked the email during the crush.
Well, it was supported with the Clintons.
I thought you didn't like the Clintons.
I thought you were bored by I am bored by them.
But I I can't go anywhere without everybody telling me how scared to death of Hillary they are.
Still.
I mean, I've went on the golf course over the weekend.
You really think Hillary's gonna be the nominee?
Oh my god, we can't beat her, can't we?
I get so sick of it I can't tell you.
So I figured it must be a lot of interest in Mrs. Clinton out there.
So I'm just trying to fire buddy up and tell you not to be worried about it.
And it is what it is, but I just I don't understand the paranoia.
Maybe people are paranoid because of past experience with the Clintons and they always slither out of whatever grasp people think we have them in.
I don't know.
I just I don't think she's that formidable.
I don't look the book tour bomb.
I that the press conferences she had at the United Nations was embarrassing.
She was ill prepared.
She was not charismatic in any way, shape, manner, or form.
There's no dynamism there.
That's my whole point.
She stuck back in the 90s and relying on the techniques that they used in the 90s to slither out of all this stuff.
Look, the Atlantic.
Yeah, this is a left wing, if anything, publication, and they've got a big long story on these emails.
And actually quote David Von Dreel of Time Magazine in describing how the Clintons or how Mrs. Clinton went through these sixty some odd thousand emails.
She commissioned a review.
She commissioned a review.
If I decided would you, Mr. Snerdley, would you commission a review of your emails if you had to find some?
What the hell does that mean?
Commission a review.
I guess it means she paid some slugs to go through it.
At any rate, she commissioned a review of 62,320 emails in her account only after the State Department, spurred by congressional investigation, asked her to do so.
And get this.
This is from the Atlantic, actually, Time Magazine.
This review did not involve opening and reading every email.
Well, there's the answer to my question.
I went for if the State Department says it's going to take them months and millions to go through 30,000 emails, how did the Clinton camp, commissioned or otherwise, go through 60,000 in a month?
Well, here's how.
They didn't open and read every email.
No, who would have to do that to find out if there's anything in them?
You know what they did?
The Clinton's lawyers Created a list of names and keywords related to her work and then keyword searched those names and terms.
Well, did they search bribe?
Did they search payoff?
Did they search pedophile playboy?
Well, what were the search terms?
We don't know what the search terms were.
But her lawyers created a list of names and keywords related to her work and searched for those.
Slightly more than half of the total cash, 31,830 emails, did not contain any of the search terms, according to Clinton's commissioned staff, so they were deemed to be private personal records.
Well, isn't that quaint?
You know what's this like?
This is like Haldeman and Ehrlichman explaining the 18-minute gap by saying, look, there's 24 hours of tape here from the from the day you wanted at the White House.
There's 18 minutes over here we can't find is a gap in eight minutes, but trust us, there's nothing in those 18 minutes.
We've gone through the remaining 23 hours and 42 minutes, whatever it is, and here's what you need.
Everything you want is if there's 18 minutes, trust us, there's nothing there.
Oh, the media would say, fine and dandy.
So you tell us there's nothing in the 18 minute gap.
Yeah, the Rosemary Woods gap.
She inadvertently erased 18 minutes, so we don't know, but this was clearly inadvertent.
There was nothing key in there.
And the media going, oh, okay.
Well, that's what they're we came up with the keyword search terms.
We're not going to tell you what the terms were, or the keywords, and then we searched.
And we we any email that did not have our search terms is deemed private, and you can't see it.
Or we threw out one of the two.
Now the what one of the one of the problems with this, obviously, uh ladies and gentlemen, is Mrs. Clinton and the Bill Hillary and Chelsea Foundation, and they have been raising money from foreign donors like while she was Secretary of State.
And one that has come to light is Wing Wing Lang, who was a Chinese, in fact, we've got the sound by a little.
Let me see if I can find which let's see.
Um not going to be able to think of it right up.
Yeah, here it is.
Grab soundbite uh 16.
This is what the this is just one example.
This was on CBS this morning, and Juliana Goldman had a report on the Clinton's ties to foreign companies that have been giving generously to the Bill Hillary and Chelsea Foundation.
The Clinton Foundation has raised at least 42 million dollars from foreign governments, and according to an analysis by CBS News, at least 170 million dollars from foreign organizations, companies, and individuals.
One donor, Reelin Enterprises, pledged two million dollars in 2013.
The company is a privately held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate that's run by billionaire Wang Wen Lang, who's a delegate to the Chinese Parliament.
Public records show the firm has spent 1.4 million dollars since 2012 lobbying Congress and the State Department.
Now, of course there's nothing to see there, right?
So here we have this Chinese conglomerate owned by Wang Wing Lang, and he's donated two million dollars to the Bill Hillary and Chelsea Foundation while she was Secretary of State.
And his is just one of at least 170 million dollars in similar type donations.
And after he gave the Clinton or Mrs. Clinton, the Foundation the money, he's remembered the Chinese Parliament, and he is lobbying Congress and the State Department, meaning Mrs. Clinton, so she's accepting money from the guy, and then he's telling her things that he would like as a lobbyist while she's at the State Department.
Those emails not released.
That stuff's deemed private.
That stuff was deemed off the record and not not anybody's business and so forth, and it's given rise to just who's gonna own this country if Mrs. Clinton's elected president?
Just what are they selling?
What have they been selling at this foundation?
Now, I have long believed, ever since Whitewater, that in addition to being full-fledged Alinsky leftists, Mrs. Clinton certainly is.
In fact, I believe they both have been.
I believe they ran a very clever tag team.
I think Bill adopted the personality of good old boy, maybe moderate centrist.
Maybe go chase some women afterwards.
It's have a good time.
Yeah.
Limbaugh wouldn't even take you with us if you shut up about what you see.
And in Mrs. Clinton, behind the scenes is doing all the radical stuff, like finding Janet Reno and Donna Shalila and working on health care.
While Bill presents the public image of the Clintons as sort of moderate centrist good old guys.
And I've always believed that to be true.
But in addition to all that, I think they have been obsessed with money.
And I think that's what Whitewater was all about.
I think the Clinton view.
Remember, this is the 80s.
And in the 80s, once the recovery kicked in, and Reaganomics fully kicked in, the economy started growing left and right, and wealth was being created at a more rapid rate, rivaled by the wealth creation of today, except it was more widespread then.
There were many more people participating in the wealth creation, just the one percent.
The Clintons didn't have any money.
I mean, Bill's 25 grand as the governor of Arkansas and Mrs. Clinton maybe make a hundred grand at the Rose Law Firm.
Everybody they ran with, everybody they ran with was hugely wealthy.
And I think that they had a jaundiced view of what I think they looked at wealth as a get rich quick scheme.
They didn't buy into this hard work business, and the Whitewater land deal was was, I think, one of the Clintons' schemes to get rich quick.
And I think they've been obsessed with money.
Mrs. Clinton, remember her story?
We were dead broke when we left the White House.
They even stole some furniture.
Do you remember they had somebody steal some furniture when they left the White House?
It was later found it had to be returned, if I'm not mistaken.
I'm not mistaken about they took furniture out of there.
And Mrs. Clinton whining and moaning about how they were dead broke.
They didn't have anything.
They're obsessed with money.
They're literally obsessed with it.
And that's what this foundation of theirs is really all about.
They just have been collecting money from all over the world.
And they're doing it on the QT, and they're taking it from wherever they can get it.
And a large percentage of it or portion of it is foreign.
Foreign governments and foreign businesses.
While she is Secretary of State, while he is a former president, and there's no doubt, as they solicit this money, they are running around claiming and promising they're going to be back in power, that Hillary's going to be president someday, and they probably don't say it directly, but there's a clear implication that a donation now will be looked upon favorably when they have regained power, run the country and so forth, whenever that is after 2016.
All of those emails have been classified as private and none of our business.
And by way of keyword search on behalf of Clinton lawyers, that's why all of this stuff is relevant.
And I'm telling you, there are uh the Democrats are uneasy today on a host of things.
Do you know in this Iranian nuclear deal, the Senate may have enough votes to override a presidential veto.
If that if it ever came to that.
I mean, there are a lot of Democrats that are signing on to the anti-Obama position on a number of things that are occurring out there.
There's a lot of unease.
I've got it in the stack, I'll get to it as the program unfolds here before your very eyes and ears.
And there is a lot of disquiet and discomfort over all of this that uh that Hillary and Bill have been doing, and there's a lot of nervousness over the sheer incompetence of that press conference that she did last week at the uh at the UN.
Now, don't misunderstand, they're not alarmed Clintons have done something illegal.
They're alarmed they might get caught.
They're alarmed that by there might be guilt by association.
They don't care what the Clintons have done.
They're worried the Clintons aren't as good as getting away with it as they used to be.
That's the fear.
A 20-year-old guy has been charged with shooting a couple of officers, the two police officers in uh in Ferguson, Missouri.
And the the claim is he wasn't aiming at the cops.
Uh it just happened.
Uh if you read the AP story on this, you have to go to the end of the story to find out his race.
They do not make that prominent, but he is African American.
The shooter, the two cops in Ferguson is indeed African American.
Get this.
A Ferguson convenience store that was looted and burned after the fatal shooting of the gentle giant is going to be rebuilt as a job training center.
Now I uh quick question.
Is this the store that the gentle giant stole the it's not the same convenience store?
It's a different one.
So I'd I've I would like the the center will be located on the site of a former quick trip.
That let me see it, that rioters set fire to August 10th, the day after uh Darren Wilson shocked the way.
It doesn't say here whether this is the same quick shop, convenience store that the gentle giant robbed.
It doesn't matter, I guess.
We'll find out at some point.
So a Ferguson convenience store that was looted and burned after the fatal shooting of the gentle giant is going to be rebuilt as a job training center.
What kind of work are they going to teach people how to loot?
What is the what kind of job training stuff is going to happen here?
Job training, you know, what do we have schools for?
What in the world is school?
What is a job training center needed for?
Why do we have schools?
I thought that's what school was.
To, among other things, train you to work.
School, I know school's babysitting a lot of other things, but but uh I've it's a meals program, so I know I've always been these job training centers.
I don't know anybody.
Do you know anybody who's ever come out of one?
Seriously, we've got we've got success story after success story after success story in America, right?
I mean millions of people, tens of millions of success stories.
Do you know anybody who got their start in a federal job training center?
I don't know one.
I do not know one.
And if there was one, we would know about it because they'd be claiming credit for every bit of success the graduate of the training center ever had.
We've got success success stories, people went to this college or that college, or dropped out of college or went to this high school or that high school or interned here or there, but we don't have one resume from some super successful person.
Yeah, I'm a graduate of the former quick shop in St. Louis now, the uh the Obama holder job training center.
They're the ones that put me on the right track.
I have never seen that.
So what goes on at these places?
Here's uh here's Keith in Chicago.
Keith, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
How are you doing, Rush?
Good.
Question for you.
I'm a corporate CEO.
I probably only get 5% of my emails that are personal in nature.
How is it possible for the U.S. Secretary of State to have that high a percentage of personal emails?
Great question.
It's how you define personal.
For example, if Wing Wing Ling from China is going to donate two million dollars to your foundation, be a personal email, obviously.
You got it.
It's the biggest thing.
If you get to define what's personal, did you hear he's a CEO?
Five percent of his email is personal.
95% is work related.
And Mrs. Clinton no, no, no.
Over half of mine is personal and private, and we've deleted it.
We've thrown it out.
Trust us.
That's a great point, Keith.
We have to take a brief time out.
Be back before you know it.
Don't go away.
Restaurants in Seattle, Washington are closing in record numbers.
Seattle is a big food town.
Seattle's a great restaurant town, big time.
And restaurants in Seattle are closing down at a more rapid rate than anybody can ever remember.
And there is a singular reason why.
▲
Export Selection