All Episodes
Previous Next
March 3, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:22
March 3, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, predictably, the Democrats are blowing a gasket.
The Democrats are blowing a gasket over this speech.
The major networks did not broadcast the speech.
It was only on the three cable networks.
PMS NBC, CNN, and Fox News.
And the network, the Democrats are just Pelosi was said to be distressed during the speech.
Her facial expressions, her tepid applause that she bolted from the House chamber right after the speech in tears, practically, and was just devastated over Netanyahu's insult to the intelligence of the United States of America.
Other Democrats called Netanyahu a baby and told him to go home.
None of this is surprising.
It's very typical.
I remember during the 80s, you know, when Reagan would speak this way of the Soviet Union.
The Democrats had a cow back then.
Every time anybody spoke in the Soviet Union in truthful terms, the Democrats got scared to death, acted scared to death anyway, and they accused whoever said things of the Soviet Union being unnecessarily provocative.
You're going to make the man, oh my God, this is going to make things worse.
They're just going to make you incite retaliatory action.
Oh my God.
And when Reagan told a joke about calling the evil empire and the bombing starts in five minutes, they about had a cow.
And apparently they are having much the same kind of reaction, only worse.
This time around.
They came out of that chamber and they bolted.
Now, for the audience that watched it, they were seen applauding it.
But then when it was over, the Democrats headed in mass exodus to the nearest cameras and microphones and just began to unload.
And they even started comparing Netanyahu to Cheney.
Darth Vader, a baby, a warmonger.
And of course, the reason they invoked Cheney is because their deranged and lunatic base has been persuaded to hate Dick Cheney.
Dick Cheney's the focus of evil in the modern world, according to the madcap leftist Democrat Party base.
And so if they can convince those people that Netanyahu was just Cheney, essentially making the speech, then they can gin up the same kind of hatred for Netanyahu.
And it wasn't that long ago.
Folks, it really wasn't that long ago.
The 90s, when the best friend Israel had was the Democrat Party.
Remember for those of you who are alive and old enough paying attention, the lengths to which Bill Clinton went to try to get a peace deal with Netanyahu.
But the point is the Democrat Party owned its support of Israel.
The Democrat Party was presumed to support Jewish people in Israel just as though they support the African American population.
Republican Party was nowhere near State of Israel.
It was suspect.
All this anti-Semitism, those allegations abounded back in the 80s and 90s, was all aimed at Republicans.
And now look at what look at the difference.
Look at the change.
The Democrat Party now hates Netanyahu.
They despise Israel.
They blame Israel for the problems in the Middle East.
And literally, it was just 20 years ago that the Democrat Party was seen as the biggest ally in the world for Israel.
I remember going to fundraisers.
This is back when I still did this kind of stuff before I learned.
And I remember Democrat politician after Democrat politician after Democrat politician telling me that the number one issue as far as he was concerned was Israel.
And you'd better support it.
Not me personally, but I mean if it his donors and people better knew, better know that he supported Israel.
It was Unambivalent.
They made no bones of the fact.
Israel was it in terms of foreign policy.
You had to be supportive of Israel.
You had to be, or you were not in going, going to be held in good favor.
And now it's it's the exact opposite.
Now Netanyahu comes in.
And of course, to understand Netanyahu's conservative.
Netanyahu to them is no different than Dick Cheney or any other conservative.
Not to mention which Netanyahu handed Obama's hat to him today.
That's what really has everybody knows what happened today.
Everybody knows who looked leadership worldly, who everybody knows who looked fearless.
It was Netanyahu.
Netanyahu made Obama look as ineffective and weak as he is.
And that just can't be allowed to stand.
And so Obama's gonna double down now.
Mark my words, the way this kind of stuff, this insolence, this show of disrespect for the dear leader, the way this kind of stuff's dealt with is massive doubling down of exactly what it is that'll make Netanyahu mad.
Mark my words.
But I'm telling you, it's just it's well, uh Snerdlin just asked me what does it make John Kerry look like?
I don't John Kerry's never looked like anything to begin with, really.
I mean, I you know, John Kerry's kind of like Hillary to me.
I just don't get it.
I think John Kerry is a walking fool.
And one of these, one of these people so impressed with himself.
I and Hillary, the same thing.
This email scandal with Hillary.
I don't know how many people, you know, everybody's looking at the wrong thing again.
Okay, so Hillary did not have an official State Department email address.
She used private email address.
And everybody's saying, my gosh, she might have broken a law.
Whoa, she might have broke.
That's not about breaking the law.
Of course she broke the law, but when have they not?
They don't care.
Obama breaks law every day, whatever executive order that he does.
That's not the point of this is Mrs. Clinton was trying to hide from the official federal record.
All emails sent by government address according to the Federal Records Act or whatever, and even prior to that, have to be preserved.
That's why the lowest learner emails vanishing was such a story, because the law requires that something backed up and backed up and backed up.
But we find out that it didn't get lost.
The lowest learner emails are right where they were supposed to be.
They just couldn't find them until everybody'd forgotten about that case.
Mrs. Clinton wanted to be able to send emails that nobody would see, folks.
And some of those emails, by the way, have been released.
One of them that was last week showed beyond a doubt that four minutes after the attack in Benghazi, Hillary Clinton knew it was a terror attack.
Had nothing to do with a video.
Four minutes.
That same night, Mrs. Clinton knew exactly what was going on.
Didn't matter.
Huddles with Obama, and they settled on this lie that all this was the result of a video made by some obscure American, and they ran with it for as long as they could get away with it.
But Hillary was just she was trying to hide official communications.
Now, you might be saying, well, how does she think she was going to do that?
Because she's sending emails.
Well, she's trusting the people she's sending the emails to to keep them private too.
And by the way, that's not a big folks.
You don't understand who these people are.
They are, they are constantly working behind everybody's back.
They're constantly working in the shadows.
They are never up front.
Everybody Hillary Clinton sending an email to doesn't have to be told, no, don't you dare let everybody see this.
They work in secret.
Everything they do is behind everybody's back.
They are never upfront now.
They can't be.
They're liberals.
The idea she didn't use a State Department email address, legal or not, it was illegal, but nothing's gonna happen to her because of that.
The biggest pitfall to Hillary Is not legal.
The biggest pitfall to Hillary as a result of this email address discovery is that it may make other Democrats ask for an alternative to her.
And that's what did her in in 2008.
If you get down to brass tacks, I'm here to tell you the only way Hillary Clinton will ever be elected president is if she gets a Democrat Party nomination, of course.
And the only way she's going to get the Democrat Party nomination is if there's no other serious candidate running.
Right.
And Joe Biden does not count as a serious candidate, but Elizabeth Warren would.
And so this story, Mrs. Clinton sent all these emails from a personal address, which means they're not protected.
I mean, she thought they were, but that very idea.
This weakens her in the eyes of a lot of people.
This makes an alternative.
You already have Ron Fournier, who is one of the intellectual guideposts for the Democrat Party, Ron Fournier today already with a piece.
You know, maybe Mrs. Clinton ought to give it up.
Maybe Mrs. Clinton really shouldn't seek the presidency.
Maybe Mrs. Clinton doesn't even really want to, he says.
The problem this story presents is that once again, it's another Clinton scandal and we don't forget the Clinton scandals.
They're out there and they're numerous.
And they don't go away.
And here's another one.
And it just opens the door for alternative candidates.
And whenever there's an alternative, like Obama shows up out of nowhere and wins, and it just proved that the Democrats really didn't want Hillary, if you ask me, otherwise she'd have gotten a nomination.
If all this falderole about she's the best candidate, she's the only candidate, she is destined to be if that were true, Obama would not have gotten anywhere in the 2008 primaries.
But what happened instead, she got defeated.
So I think the pitfall for Mrs. Clinton is that this opens the door for alternatives, and that does her in.
Alternative candidates.
There's also something else in these emails.
It has been learned and discovered that among the people she was emailing and seeking advice from during such instances as Benghazi was the esteemed Sidney Blumenthal, who is her fellow traveler partner in crime.
Sidney Blumenthal was at her right hand throughout her first lady and throughout her Senate days.
But Obama hates the guy.
Obama banned Sidney Blumenthal from having any official job in his administration, even over at state helping Hillary.
And there she was emailing him and seeking his advice.
And that is not going to sit well with Obama and the regime and the Democrat Party hierarchy.
There's all kinds of problems here for her that have nothing to do with whether or not what she did was legal or illegal.
But so when is illegal stop these people anyway?
If we can be honest about it.
But I just I just want to reiterate here that Netanyahu was so effective today that the Democrat Party's now on the war path to destroy him.
And part and parcel of that will be Obama doubling down on his uh Iranian nuke policy.
He'll be doubling down on the aspects of it that everybody, most everybody does not like.
Now I'm gonna head to the phones here, but just one more thing here on the uh on the Hillary emails.
The Sydney Blumenthal emails were hacked.
One of the things we know here is that Hillary's email account was hacked by by a hacker that calls him or herself Goosefer.
As in Lucifer with a G, or Gucci fur.
It's spelled G-U-S-S-I-F-R-G.
Gucci fur, Goosefer, Lucifer, whatever.
They hacked Blumenthal's emails.
This hacker, Goosefer, however you pronounce this, is a Romanian.
And the hacker turned Over the hacked Sydney Blumenthal emails to Vladimir Putin's mouthpiece, Russia Today.
Russia today has access to Mrs. Clinton State Department emails.
So if this hacker could do it, the hacker, and the hacker is well known by this name in the hacking community.
I just don't know how to pronounce it.
G-U-SS looks like Gucci for, but who knows what it is.
But this hacker, if this hacker can hack Clinton, and the domain is clintonemail.com.
That was the email domain.
If the hacker can hack that domain, then it would be child's play for the Russians or the ChaiComs to hack.
Hillary's email.
So these emails from Sidney Blumenthal, who has been banned from Hillary using by Obama, and she went ahead and did it anyway.
These emails from Sidney Blumenthal using the Clintonemail.com domain were hacked by this Romanian hacker.
He turned them all over to Putin's media mouthpiece, Russia Today.
So what it's not so much whether she broke the law or not.
This is a huge, huge national security breach.
By not using official government email domains.
Anyway, people want to weigh in on this Netanyahu and uh end Iran stuff, so we'll start in San Diego with Simon.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
You're up first today.
It's great to have you here.
Thank you, sir, for all that you do.
Uh my point is with Iran's goals.
There's no way that they're not going to make a nuclear weapon.
Uh their view of the world is they need it to protect themselves and they'll use it as a way to project their power.
So the idea that some kind of negotiation would make them stop.
Uh I just don't see them accepting it.
They're just like North Korea or China or the Soviet Union.
They need it and they believe they have to have a new country.
Right.
Now you see, now this is one of Netanyahu's points today, and one of the comments he made, I think it's been somewhat overlooked.
It'll find they'll I think by the time we get to the chat shows tonight, this comment that I'm going to remind everybody of is going to be front and center.
Right now it's being overlooked in favor of other things.
What Netanyahu said was look, you can have all the inspectors in the world and they can go in there and spot all the things, and we can see it and they can find the violations, but they do not stop them.
And he said Israel can now defend itself and we will go it alone.
And that, folks, was one of the most, as far as Obama's concerned, threatening elements of this speech.
Because Netanyahu pledged in the name of his country to go it alone, if he has to.
And Obama, I'm sorry, Netanyahu acknowledged that there isn't any speech.
There are no words that are going to persuade Iran to give up their quest for the nuclear bomb.
Netanyahu understands the world is not governed by the aggressive use of speeches.
Obama was elected to office in 2008 on the premise that he had the power with his words to tame the world's tyrants.
Have the world's tyrants been tamed or are they laughing at us?
Obama hasn't tamed the world's tyrants.
Obama makes excuses for them.
That's another big contrast in this speech out there today.
Netanyahu was fearless in speaking up for his own country and explaining why his own country was worth saving.
And promise and no equivocation about the value of his own country and no equivocation about how far he would go to save it and defend it.
Contrast that to Obama, who, when he tells us about our enemies, he tells us we need to understand them.
He tells us that we need to understand and we need to like Marie Harf.
Well, no, you just have to understand.
They're not really militant Islamists.
They just don't have John.
And they have been economy.
And so we need old jobs program for ISIS.
So we we get from our administration excuses made for our enemies.
It's worse than that.
Our administration tells us how our country is responsible for our enemies.
Netanyahu didn't do that.
Netanyahu didn't tell anybody Israel is to blame for Iran or ISIS.
Netanyahu said Iran is Iran, and Iran is responsible for themselves.
And so is Israel, and we're not going to rely on words.
And we're not going to rely on inspectors.
And we don't have to rely on anybody but ourselves.
You see, Benjamin Netanyahu didn't seem to have any empathy for Iran.
Benjamin Netanyahu did not say anything like we hear from Obama.
And others in his administration, which is, well, I'm sure that Germany thinks they're exceptional too.
And I'm sure that the Austrians think they're exceptional.
And what would we have done if somebody told us we couldn't build a nuclear weapon back when we did it?
So who are we to tell the Iranians that they can't have one?
That's why the Obama administration approach here is go ahead and let them have it.
Try to delay them getting it for 10 years, big whoop, but then persuade them never to use it.
That is the Obama administration policy.
And they think that their guy can do it with the power of his personality and his aura.
In his words, and then Netanyahu says that's.
Sorry, we can't rely on that.
We believe in prevention, and we'll do it ourselves if we have to.
And welcome back, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
800 282 2882 if you want to be on the program and the email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com are gonna get Democrat response.
We got those soundbikes.
But let me get a call or two in since people have been waiting so long.
I want to acknowledge uh their patience.
Gary and Fort Wayne and Diana, thank you for waiting, and you're next.
What's up?
Hi, Rush.
Thank you for taking my call.
I'm an avid listener, but a first-time caller.
I'm calling today to get your opinion on uh Israel and its possible response to Iran becoming a nuclear power.
Um I'm glad to see that the prime minister is not misguided as to what the greatest threat facing his nation is.
I never heard him mention climate change even once.
Do you think it's possible that a Israel will find its back to the wall to the extent that a nuclear response?
I don't think there's any doubt about it.
He said that.
That was that that to me is one of the most committed and powerful aspects of this speech today.
He said that Israel, the Jewish state can now defend itself, and it will go it alone if they have to on this.
There's no question.
One other thing here, uh on the on the Netanyahu Facebook page.
There's a picture of BB while giving the speech today with this headline.
The days when the Jewish people remain passive in the face of genocidal enemies, those days are over.
Netanyahu made it clear the Obama deal is a loser.
The Iranians can get a nuclear weapon either by following the deal or breaking it.
Stop and think of that for a second.
But this is that is that is so simple, it's profound.
The Iranians, I mean, this is this is a no lose for them.
They get a nuclear bomb by either following the deal or breaking the deal.
James Rosen at Fox News just reported 75% of Iran's centrifuges have been installed during Obama and Hillary and John Kerry's watch.
You need centrifuges to prepare the uh uranium and the polonium 210 and all the rest of the stuff.
75% of the centrifuges Iran needs to do this have been installed on the Obama watch.
Have been installed with Hillary Clinton's Secretary of State and John Kerry as Secretary of State.
75%, three fourths of what they need to get there has happened during this administration.
So I don't think there's any mistake what Netanyahu was saying today.
They're not going to put up with this.
And they're not going to be talked out of defending themselves.
And if they have to go it alone, they will.
And he came here to tell everybody.
And Pelosi ends up in tears.
Hill.com.
Pelosi near tears at BB insult.
Pelosi said, and that is why, as one who values the U.S. Israel relationship and loves Israel, I was near tears throughout the Prime Minister's speech, saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the U.S., saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation.
She's an idiot.
We are not preventing nuclear proliferation.
We are sanctioning it.
We are allowing Iran in ten years to get where they need to be to produce a bomb, and we're relying on the power of our speeches to persuade them not to do it.
Not to use them.
Cummings, Georgia, Gary, your next EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Welcome.
Wow, great to talk to you.
Been listening since uh you went on the air here in Atlanta area.
Well, I appreciate that.
Thank you very much.
I had a question.
Uh, regardless of what kind of agreement he makes with the Iran, doesn't he have to get the consent of the Senate?
You know, all these questions used to matter.
And I'm not being flippant.
Yeah, you're talking about the Senate having to ratify.
Yeah.
Um depends on whether Obama calls it a treaty or an executive action.
I mean, he's going to raise taxes.
He's talking about raising taxes with executive action.
He's going to grant amnesty with executive action.
Yeah.
The Congress has said he's not going to, they're not going to stop him.
So let me put this thing.
If the Senate doesn't go along with the Iranian deal, it's not going to stop Obama from making it.
Hear me loud, folks.
There's nothing stopping Barack Obama.
He's got the remainder of these next two years.
He's basically got twenty two months to go.
We're two months into two years.
You better get ready.
The Republican Party has made it clear they are not going to stop him.
They're not going to stop him via impeachment.
And I think what they're concluding, you know what, this this latest homeland security thing, I think what I think the Republicans think the power of the person won't even stop him.
Well, uh they they haven't tried it because they didn't work.
They don't think there's any stopping the guy.
They don't think there's any, even if they deny him the money, he'll still do it.
Is what they think.
So it so it, but that doesn't matter.
That shouldn't stop them from doing the right thing.
You know, that's just because they're gonna rob the bank doesn't mean we should stop trying to arrest bank robbers for crying out.
Anyway, I'm not.
Well the questions used to, questions about, well, doesn't the Constitution say that the Senate has to ratify it?
Those questions don't matter anymore.
You really think, especially now after the Netanyahu speak, you really think Obama is gonna let something as inconsequential as the Senate not ratifying his deal stop him.
You mean to tell me that he's gonna negotiate this deal, now he's gonna double down on this deal since he feels insulted by Netanyahu.
And since if if Obama is in any way chivalrous, he'll have to do this to defend Pelosi, who was reduced to tears today.
This mean, evil foreign leader made Pelosi cry, and that will not stand.
So Obama will double down.
He'll go ahead and fast track a deal with Iran that nobody likes.
This is his way of getting even with insolence, disrespect, and being shown up.
So he'll do it, and then the Senate come along and say, we know we're gonna ratify that.
Obama said, Oh, okay, fine.
Well, I'll come back another day.
You really think it's gonna happen?
The Senate not ratifying it, it's gonna stop Obama.
Folks, hear me loud.
None of that matters anymore.
The Constitution is only an impediment for people who respect it and revere it.
Obama doesn't.
The Constitution is an obstacle.
The Constitution is in his way.
What he's doing is getting it out of the way with all these executive actions.
So I'm no, I'm not trying to be, no, I'm not trying to be disrespectful to the caller.
I'm just saying it used to matter.
You know, presidents who didn't have their treaties ratified by the Senate had to deal with it.
They think Obama's, especially the Republicans saying Mitch McConnell stop him.
Ha ha ha.
Fat chance.
And all it took was the Republicans promising not to impeach and not to use any other constitutional measure.
I mean, they could sue him, they could take him back to court and sue him.
It's long pro they could do that, but they've made it clear they're not going to stop him.
If if I were a tyrant like Obama, if I have these desires, if I got two years left, and I'm fundamentally dedicated to transforming this country, and I've been told nobody's going to stop me.
It's Katie Bardador.
Get me secretariat.
I'm on top, and we're not stopping until I finish transforming this country.
I'll take Marie Harf along for night times.
So I think...
What?
Obama's the only one listening to what I say.
What do you?
Oh, no, don't.
What are you blaming me?
Are you there?
Snerdley's in there saying that Obama's the only guy in Washington listening to me because you're saying that because Obama's doing everything I predict.
That's not, he's not listening to me.
He doesn't listen to me.
And he he's not doing anything he's doing because I'm saying it.
I know he's doing it because I know what liberals are.
I'm able to predict it, not because I know him personally.
I don't need to know him personally and know what he's going to do.
I know the type.
I it's it's not.
I don't know, to me it isn't hard.
Other people don't want to go there for some reason.
But as we all know, doesn't stop me.
What?
No, there's nothing.
There's nothing going to stop the deal.
The Obama, Iran deal?
Nothing's going to stop it.
Netanyahu knows nothing's going to stop it.
That's why he comes over and says we have to go alone, they will.
He was laying down markers today.
He knows he's not going to get Obama to change.
He knows Obama's not going to respond to public opinion, even if there is any.
This speech was for the rest of the world.
This this speech had many different purposes, but there was this speech not aimed at Obama.
Netanyahu didn't come over here to make a speech to Obama.
Try to change Obama's mind.
Try to get Obama to listen to reason.
It's not what he was doing.
White House is not the audience here.
Iran was the audience.
ISIS was the audience.
Western nations still treasuring liberty and freedom are the audience.
Militant jihadists were the audience.
Nobody lives in the illusion that Obama was the target here because BB can't get to him otherwise.
You know, Obama won't meet with him.
Okay, so I'll come give a joint speech.
Obama might have been a target in the sense of I want to show the world what real leadership is.
But Obama was not the audience in terms of maybe he'll listen to reason.
We're way past that.
Come on, folks, wake up now.
Okay, let's now go to the audio sound bites and the Democrat Party response.
It's like a Republican president gave a State of the Union speech, and the Democrats get their equal time here.
They ran to the microphones.
It's incredible.
By the way, I I think we got a call coming up that's going to remind us of this.
But uh, you know, Netanyahu quoted Moses.
Moses is in a chamber.
There's a carving of Moses on the wall of the House chamber.
And Netanyahu had the goal to actually quote Moses.
This is the Democrat Party that left God out of their convention in 2012.
Don't forget that.
This is the party that booed God.
So you're John Lewis, who was beat upside the head at uh at the Edmund Pettis Bridge and film.
And he's uh credited member of the civil rights movement, big congressman from uh from Georgia.
He's been there for decades now, and he was one of the Democrats that ran to the uh cameras and microphones after the Netanyahu speech.
I take a back seat to no one in my commitment and support of Israel and the American Jewish community.
However, this nation is currently involved in ongoing negotiation with Iran.
Election in Israel, just about two weeks away on March 17th.
The speaker of the House of Representative would allow the floor at this chamber to be used to honorcut the negotiation of the president of the United States is partisan and it's not right.
It is my hope that today's partisan political flow will never ever be repeated again on the House floor.
Oh feel so bad for Congressman Lewis.
He had to sit there and witness the lowest partisan political low that there's ever been on the House floor, and he always is never repeated.
And he had to sit there and watch his dear president's Iran deal undermined.
Let's not forget something.
Many of you, you may not know this.
The Obama administration has its own campaign experts on the ground in Israel right now and for the past week or two, attempting to defeat Netanyahu.
Obama campaign operatives are helping to run the campaign of uh Netanyahu's opponent in Israel.
Talk about a partisan political woe.
Here is Jim McDermott, Baghdad Jim McDermott, after Netanyahu's speech.
He was trying to make people afraid, and somehow saying that the president wasn't doing his job.
This was a very sad display of political activity being brought into the House of Representatives to mean what the president has been doing under great stress for the last years, six, eight months directly, but even before that.
How do you get things on a safe position with Iran?
The president deserves our support and didn't need this today.
John Boehner ought to be ashamed of himself for having brought it on him.
Okay.
This is just evidence here of how effective Netanyahu's speech was that both John Lewis and Baghdad, why do we call him Baghdad, Jim?
Baghdad Jim McDermott practically went to Baghdad to act as a human shield.
So that George W. Bush couldn't institute military action there.
Baghdad Jim McDermott sighted with our enemies from Nicaragua to the Soviet Union to uh Iraq.
For Jim McDermott to talk about a sad display of political activity brought to the House of Representatives to mean the president.
You ever heard of the Bolden Amendment, Congressman?
Here is Earl Blumenauer, Democrat from Oregon.
I've been in Congress 19 years, back to when he first came.
I've listened to his alarmist predictions.
I listened to him cheerlead for the United States' greatest single blunder in our history, the Iraq War that cost trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives, and the extent to which he's accurate that somehow Iran controls now four countries.
There's some question about that.
Some question?
You mean you can't automatically refute the claim that Iran controls four countries?
There's some question of that.
And finally, John Yarmouth.
This is the Democrat that drew the analogy of Netanyahu to Darth Vader.
This speech was straight out of the Dick Cheney playbook.
This was fear-mongering at its ultimate.
Phrases like essentially saying nuclear war is inevitable if this deal were to be, a deal were to be accepted.
Phrases like this would pave the way to Iran having a nuclear bomb.
These are things that I think are, again, part of what Dick Cheney would have done and did.
You realize how intellectually vacant that is.
This guy has nothing to say.
He has no intellectual opposition, no intellectual substance to his disagreement here.
So all they can do is invoke the name of Dick Cheney, which is a dog whistle to the insane lunatic Democrat Party base.
That's all that was.
We still have an hour to go, my friends, and we have covered more in these two hours and done it in depth.
And you'll hear in a whole week elsewhere.
And there's still stuff to do, and we have not yet touched on.
▲
Export Selection