All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 23, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:29
February 23, 2015, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, I'm telling you, that isn't going to work.
It hasn't worked for 25 years.
It isn't going to work.
We're not going to gain any ground with a low-information crowd or anybody else by simply pointing out what a bunch of hypocrites the Democrats are.
For example, everybody's jumping on Rudy for what he said about Obama not loving the country and some Republicans, some media types.
You know what?
Nobody got upset when Obama said that Bush was unpatriotic.
Nobody got upset when Obama questioned Bush's patriotism.
And you said, when did Obama do that?
Oh, a bunch of times, folks.
But I remember one time specifically, Obama used to say that Bush running up the national debt was unpatriotic.
But Obama had a number of different allegations about Bush in this regard.
Nobody cared because it's the media.
Nobody ran around to other Democrats and asked them, so, Mrs. Clinton, what do you think that Barack Obama means when he says the president of the United States is not a patriot?
It ain't going to happen, folks, until now.
Now maybe we can make it happen.
But simply, in the middle of this Rudy situation, by the way, greetings and welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
Talent.
So much.
Talent.
Wish I could share some.
On loan from God, 800-282-2882.
Simply pointing out what a bunch of hypocrites the Democrats are is not going to get a single vote.
It's not going to change a single mind.
I've watched this.
I've tried it myself.
I've thought in the old days that pointing out the hypocrisy, just like what I said about Hollywood.
For example, do you think I'm not going to do anything other than be entertaining to you and maybe cause some people to go, oh, yeah, yeah, I never looked at it that way.
But in terms of actually changing anything, it isn't going to.
So here you have, just to refresh what I'm talking about, Patricia Arquette goes out there and starts whining and moaning about income inequality, about how women are getting the short end of the stick, women getting the shaft because they're not being paid as much as men.
And everybody goes, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And then you find out where it's happening is Hollywood, where she works.
Okay, fine.
It's Hollywood that doesn't pay women as much as men.
It's Hillary Clinton that doesn't pay her women on her senate staff as much as men.
That's great hypocrisy.
That is one of the greatest examples, illustrations I could give you.
Is it going to change anybody who watches e-entertainment on a regular basis mind?
There has to be more than just pointing out these people are hypocrites, is my point.
You could say of Obama all those times that he alleged that Bush was unpatriotic for this, that, the other thing as a means of defending Rudy, and it isn't going to work.
The way it's starting to shape up now, however, as I mentioned in the first hour of the program, is showing great promise.
Here's the way it works.
Rudy Giuliani will go out and it will make a speech.
In this case, it was at 21, the fashionable New York dining establishment.
And it was a dinner hosted by three prominent Republicans, and it was sort of an audition.
It was Scott Walker's turn to come show these guys that he's worth it.
Potential fundraisers, conservative Republican media types.
It was his turn.
They do this.
It was Stephen Moore.
I always have a mental block.
Stephen Moore.
Oh, geez.
I'm sorry.
I can't remember the other two, but I did last week.
Anyway, this around Robin.
Ted Cruz will have his night and another.
Oh, I can't remember.
It doesn't matter who.
It was at this speech that Rudy made his comment about Obama not loving America like the rest of us do.
So the standard operating procedure, media hears about it.
First thing they do is act shocked and outraged and start bashing Rudy.
The next thing they do is go to prominent Republicans.
What do you think about what Rudy said?
Are you prepared to condemn Rudy Giuliani for saying President Obama doesn't love America?
The setup is: okay, here the media is going to make sure that other Republicans throw another Republican overboard, which I cannot tell you how frustrated that has made me over these years.
I've been doing this program 26 years, and I've watched it for every one of those 26 years.
And I have watched Republicans dutifully comply.
Media comes calling, demanding that the Republicans condemn whatever controversial statement some other Republican made, throw him overboard.
The Republicans do so because they want to be in good graces with the media, but it doesn't get them in good graces with the media.
So after they throw the Republican overboard, this is the way it used to work, and may still, isolated occasions.
After the media succeeds in getting other Republicans to throw Rudy overboard, they then go to Republicans a second time and say, will you now admit that Obama is somebody who loves America?
So they get a double whammy out of it.
They go to the Republicans to get a Republican to throw one of their own overboard, which has always worked.
And then they go back the second time, demanding that the Republicans validate the Democrat and say that the Democrat's a good guy.
They say that the Democrat is not what that idiot Republican alleged that got all this started.
And this is how Republicans sell out their own and have been doing that for as long as I've been doing this.
I watched it happen to Oliver North.
I can't tell you the number of Republicans I've had.
All these Tea Party Republicans, you can't.
I mean, it was almost a fait accompli it was going to happen to them.
Well, they tried it with Scott Walker.
He was at this dinner at 21.
It was Stephen Moore, an art laffer, and there was one other.
It was a troika of guys that supposedly you have to kill Kudlow, yeah, Kudlow, Larry Kudlow, who I don't think is as conservative as he used to be.
Not after the years at CNB.
So, well, some of the things he's been writing lately, I don't think he's not saying he's not conservative.
I'm not throwing him overboard.
I'm just saying he's not as conservative as I.
I mean, Kudlow's a guy that explained baseline budgeting to me back early 90s.
But what happens now is these media guys went to Scott Walker.
And of course, the point was he's leading Republican presidential polls now.
So they've got to take him out.
Media has to take him out.
So here's Rudy, not running for anything, but used to, be the mayor of New York City, former presidential candidate.
Rudy goes out and says Obama doesn't love America.
So Governor Walker, what do you think about Rudy Giuliani saying Obama doesn't love the country?
And Walker is not playing the game.
Walker's saying, you know what?
I don't care.
Rudy speaks for himself.
I mean, he's a New Yorker.
They say all kinds of crazy stuff in New York.
But he didn't leave it at that.
He then said, you know, I don't see any of you guys going asking Joe Biden or asking Clinton or Obama what they think of the latest embarrassing thing Joe Biden said.
I don't hear any of you media people going to say Hillary Clinton asking her what she thinks of her husband flying around on a private jet owned by an admitted pedophile and hunkering down at the pedophile's house.
I just don't, you guys, I don't remember you asking Hillary about that.
And then the media says, you're not playing the game.
This is not what you're supposed to say.
You're a coward.
They call Scott Walker a coward for avoiding their question.
So they doubled down on trying to get Walker tagged as a coward by asking, do you think, do you think that Obama's a Christian?
You think he's not a Christian?
You know, there's a bunch of Republicans saying they question whether he's a Christian.
Do you think Obama's a Christian?
Scott Walker again refused to take the bait.
I don't care, he said.
I don't know, he said.
I don't know Obama.
I've never talked religion with Obama.
It doesn't matter to me.
If you want to know if Obama's a Christian, go ask him.
The media really ticked off now because the trick that they've gotten away with for 26 years has just been denied them by no less than the Republican frontrunner, who they desperately want to take out, who they desperately want to tag as a coward or an idiot for refusing to even answer the question.
Remember what he is in London.
And he was meeting with the Prime Minister of Great Britain and the mayor of London, and some media person over there asked him what he thinks about evolution out of the blue in relationship to absolutely nothing.
And Scott Walker is not going to answer that.
I'm not here to talk.
Evolution, I'm not what he's talking about.
I'm not, unlike Romney, who went ahead after being pressed, did answer the contraception question, thereby igniting the war on women, Walker wasn't going to answer it and he didn't answer.
So the media is left to accuse Walker of being a coward or a boopkis or a Midwestern hick not qualified for the office.
He won't even, he may not even know what evolution is, they say.
That's why he won't answer it.
He's a coward because he won't answer because he doesn't know.
And he doesn't know because he didn't go to college.
This guy's really a reprobate, they want you to believe.
The truth of the matter is, the media has been denied a scalp.
They were looking for Rudy's scalp, and by extension, they wanted Scott Walker's scalp.
They wanted Walker to condemn Rudy, or better, they wanted Walker to defend Rudy.
They wanted Walker to stand and say, Rudy's right.
You know what?
I don't think Obama loves him.
Oh, they would have been a nirvana if Scott Walker had said that.
Instead, he threw it right back at him.
You know, I don't recall you guys going out and asking other Democrats what they think whenever Joe Biden opens his mouth or whenever Joe Biden starts nuzzling the neck of some woman that he barely knows right there on camera.
I don't recall you media people ever asking any of these Democrats to explain themselves.
You talk about the Koch brothers, this and that.
I don't recall any of you running around and asking Democrats about their questionable donors and the source of their big bucks.
And it's that is, I can't tell you it's music to my ears.
It is the exact way to handle it.
Now, my point is, in the midst of all just pointing out the hypocrisy, I love doing it, but at the same time, I know it doesn't matter at all.
It doesn't carry any weight.
Pointing out the hypocrisy of Hollywood, pointing out the hypocrisy of the feminist movement and Bill Clinton.
You can point out the hypocrisy all day long.
Here's Bill Clinton who has used women, who has degraded women, who may have raped one, if we are to believe Juanita Broderick.
Here is a guy who Clinton, number one aide, goes on television waving a dollar bill, says, Way one of these around through a train of pocket, what are you going to get?
You're going to get Paula Jones.
That's what you're going to get.
So he's got the bimbo eruption.
You're going to get the whole Clinton presidential apparatus designed to destroy women.
And the feminist movement can't get enough of Bill Clinton.
Well, you can point that hypocrisy out all day long.
And last I looked, it hadn't hurt Clinton.
He's a bigger rock star than ever, despite all that hypocrisy.
And maybe even because of it.
As corrupt and perverted as the left is in the way they define victory.
But this refusing to go along with their tricks, refusing to fall for the trick and answer the question or the opportunity to condemn Rudy and the subsequent opportunity to praise Obama and to validate Obama.
Look at this headline from thehill.com.
Walker called out for silence on Juliana.
See, this is how it works.
He didn't give them what they want, so now they're doubling down on him, and he's an idiot.
He's a coward.
He's uninformed.
He didn't go to college.
Don't know what he's talking about.
But this is the way to do it.
Just throw it right back at the media rather than accept the premise.
This has been my whole point.
All the Republicans could have beat half the media juggernaut back years ago if they would have adopted simply one technique.
And that is do not fall for or accept the premise of most every media question because every damn one of them's a gotcha.
Every media question of a Republican, particularly during campaign season, is a setup.
And it is not designed to make you look good.
It's not designed to make a Republican look worldly or different from the controversial Republican or what have you.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out.
I'll give you some audio soundbites how frustrated the media is over their inability to trick Scott Walker up on this.
Don't go away.
Let me give you an example.
There's some more Scott Walker headlines.
USA Today, Governor Walker doesn't know if Obama loves his country.
The Hill headline, I don't know if Obama loves America is Christian.
From the Huffington Puffington Post, Scott Walker, I don't really know whether Obama loves America.
From the Washington Post, Scott Walker's cowardice should disqualify him.
That's Dana Milbank.
These guys, I'm telling you, because he's from Wisconsin, they do not understand.
You know, it'd be very easy.
The left threw everything at Scott Walker they have in debates.
You know, the mayor of Milwaukee was one of his opponents, one of the elections.
The mayor of Milwaukee insulted him, invaded his personal space, towered over him in these debates, mistreated him, accused him of all kinds, and Walker never responded to any of it.
He just kept talking about his agenda.
He beat it back.
These people in the media in the Northeastern corridor have got their narratives and they've got their templates.
They've got the way they do things.
And there's a technique now to taking Republicans out.
Just discussed it.
Not going to repeat it.
But Walker's not playing the game.
And if they would have just spent some time watching how he operated, how he won three elections in four years in the state of Wisconsin, they might have an indication that none of this is going to shake him up.
None of this is going to bother him at all.
All these headlines, you know, There's a rule of thumb when you are in a music business in radio, and it is you can never be hurt by a song you don't play.
I mean, nobody's ever going to tune out because they haven't heard a song, because nobody will know for sure you've never played it.
Nobody listens 24-7, 365.
But you can be hurt by a song you do play.
You play a rotten song, rotten record, people will tune out.
By the same token, a politician can really not be hurt by what he doesn't say, but can be by what he does.
Now, that's not, there are certain times we're not saying something in certain circumstances, but not this.
This is not one of them, because it's a gotcha moment.
He's just not responding, gotcha moment, and they are so ticked because they're used to Republicans caving at the first sign of pressure.
And Walker, and he's not the only one, by the way.
There are a lot of Republicans who are starting to stand up to this, but particularly now some conservative media people are finally joining this chorus when the standard practice has always been mollify the media.
Oh my God, the media try to be nice to them.
Give them what they want.
Oh my God, but don't buck the media.
And we're now bucking the media and it's not supposed to happen.
But I'm here to tell you, it's exactly what Republican voters want.
Republican voters don't separate the media from the Democrat Party.
Republican voters don't think there's any difference between the Democrat presidential nominee and the media.
And there is no way that Republicans should not know this.
And therefore, there's no way the Republicans ought to treat the media as though they're objective and fair when they're not.
And everybody knows they're not.
They're just a branch officer of the Democrat Party.
And you just, you never let your enemy beat you on purpose.
You never fall for tricks that your enemy plays on you.
But the Republicans always have when it's and they've said, well, you know, it's the landscape we have to deal with.
We have to show we're tough.
We have to show we can deal.
We can't run from the media.
Walker's not running from the media.
He's just not playing the game.
He's not going to throw Rudy Giuliani overboard, just like he's not going to throw any other Republican overboard.
No Republican should, but that's been the track record.
Throw a controversial Republican overboard so you can look good to the media.
It's a selfish, vain ploy.
And it is ultimately destructive for the party.
Give you a soundbite.
F. Chuck Todd.
This is Sunday morning on Meet the Press.
F. Chuck, the second choice to host the show.
Jon Stewart was first.
Here's Chuck Todd remarks about Giuliani talking about Barack Hussein.
Oh.
What have we learned from this mess?
And I say this a mess because I tell you, I've hated this story in so many ways.
It brings out the worst in the press.
I think it's bringing out the worst in some politicians.
It's a race to the bottom, and now we know why everybody's cynical about the press and politics.
Come on, Chuck.
You're only upset about this because Walker didn't play ball.
You're only upset about this because Rudy didn't play ball.
You went to Rudy and you wanted him to back off of it and he didn't.
You went to Rudy and you wanted him to apologize for it and he didn't.
I guarantee you, Chuck Todd would not hate this story if Rudy had played ball.
If Rudy had played ball and apologized and came groveling back to the media and to Obama begging forgiveness for this outrageous comment, they would have loved the story.
They didn't get what they wanted out of the story, which is why they're not crazy about it.
I got to take a break.
We got much more straight ahead, including your phone calls.
So don't go away.
I'm going to give you another example here before we get back to the phones.
This is a great example of hypocrisy.
It ain't going to mean anything.
So the media is demanding that Scott Walker condemn Rudy Giuliani.
I just gave you some of the headlines.
In fact, there's another headline from The Hill.
Walker called out for silence on Giuliani.
Governor Walker doesn't know if Obama loves his country.
I don't know if Obama loves America is Christian, says the Hill.
Huffing and Puffington Post.
Scott Walker, I don't really know whether Obama loves America, blah, blah, blah.
So everybody, the media demanding that Scott Walker condemn Rudy and throw him overboard.
Let me throw a quote back.
What are you laughing at in there?
Oh, they are tied up.
But listen to this.
If you remember this, I can no more disown him than I can disown my white grandmother.
That was Barack Hussein-O.
In a famous speech on race that everybody but me has forgotten.
It was March 18th, 2008, and he was talking about Jeremiah Wright.
And this is a great example throughout the entire 2008 campaign when all kinds of people on the right were pointing out Jeremiah Wright and playing Jeremiah Wright, soundbites in the pulpit.
Jeremiah Wright's extremist nutcase hated America, making it plain he hated Americans.
And Obama sat in his church for 20 years.
And the media thought there wasn't a story there.
There wasn't a story.
Not interested whatsoever.
So here's Giuliani.
He goes out there and says whatever he says about Obama.
And the media stops everything and starts going to every damn Republican can find demanding.
They comment on it, condemn Rudy, disown Rudy, throw him over.
Jeremiah Wright goes on for years.
And the media had to be dragging, kicking, and screaming to it.
And it resulted in Obama doing a speech in which he said, I can no more disown Jeremiah Wright than I can disown my own white grandmother.
And it was applauded as brilliant.
What if Scott Walker said, I can no more disown Rudy Giuliani than I could disown Thomas Jefferson?
The media has no problem with Obama's mentors.
No problem with Jeremiah Wright.
No problem with Bill Ayers.
No problem with any of Obama's radical mentors and extremist friends to this day.
Rudy Giuliani is not the problem.
He identified the problem.
And that's what's got the media clutching their pearls on a fainting couch.
Oh, they got the vapors.
Not supposed to happen.
This isn't supposed to.
You're not supposed to question anything about Obama.
The left is hogs.
Have you seen these people on TV?
From Mary Ann Marsh, I tell you, whatever.
I don't care whatever Democrat strategist, analyst, whatever on Fox, the Three Network, they are beside themselves over what Rudy said.
They can't believe it.
They're beside themselves.
They're demanding that Rudy apologize, forgive, and go away and take it back and so forth.
And why are they so upset?
Get too close to home, if you ask me.
If you ask me, the Democrats have been applauding themselves for seven years, getting away with keeping this stuff under the rug for that long.
Rudy Giuliani, American hero.
Jeremiah Wright, disgrace.
Ran the only church that captured Obama's time and imagination for the length of time, by the way.
Every other church was deemed boring.
17, 20 years, whatever, Obama regularly attends Jeremiah Wright's church.
He now goes sporadically, if at all, through, even though he said he wasn't, he threw Jeremiah Wright overboard.
Jeremiah Wright expected to get the treatment.
He predicted it.
But Rudy isn't the problem, and Scott Walker doesn't have a problem.
It's Obama that has the problem, and the media knows it.
That's why they're in a tizzy.
Okay, here's Jim in Southeast Missouri.
Great to have you, sir, on the EIB network.
Hello.
21-year-old listener from the Sykes and Cape Girardeau area, and I'd be remiss in my duties as a listener if I didn't tell you how much my five- and ten-year-old children have enjoyed listening to the first and third parts of the Rush Revere series.
It's been fantastic.
Thank you very much, Jim.
I really appreciate that.
And I kind of want to, I guess, dovetail into the Oscars.
Now, I haven't watched it in years.
You know, it's the same old parade of people who like to smell their own flesh once, I guess, so I don't watch anymore.
But I picked up on Ms. Artette's comment about equality for women, and it's a thing that's bothered me for years.
It's a part of the hypocritical game.
They talk about equality.
We all know it means same pay or some of the same jobs as men.
But why not extend this out to true real equality where women who maybe want to be in the front lines of combat, we can have all women apply or register with selective service.
Perhaps we could have women be treated in divorce custody cases the same as a man, no preferential treatment.
Maybe they get the same punishment for cocaine sentencing.
And furthermore, let's say Mary Kayla Turno, when she got probation for having sex with a 13-year-old student years ago, why not treat her like a man?
I mean, that's what true equality ought to be about, shouldn't it?
Yes, but you see, women as minorities forever are allowed more latitude and leeway in doing things that are not kosher, unconventional, or in violation of the law.
And there's a little bit more compassion and understanding.
You talk about front lines in combat.
Of course they had to change standards for women to qualify.
I mean, the physical differences alone are what they are.
Can't deny them.
So they had the same thing for women firefighters and this.
They had to change the standards.
The point is, when you start making these concessions, it never ends.
I remember back in the 70s when I actually took my first stab at doing a talk show at a radio station in Kansas City and played music.
It wasn't a full-fledged talk show.
It was the brand new FM station, and it was a totally experimental format.
But I remember that affirmative action was one of the big deals then.
And I remember having on some affirmative action aficionado who was explaining the whys and wherefores of it.
It was to make amends for past transgressions, among other things.
It was to level the playing field.
And I said, okay, well, when does that end?
At what point are you going to say that we've made amends?
At what point are the past transgressions going to have been equalized?
He said, oh, never.
I said, what?
Oh, never.
He was very honest.
This is back before people were willing to be open and honest and upfront.
The political awareness back then in terms of things like talk radio just didn't exist.
So this guy was totally at ease telling me there wasn't going to be any end to it.
So I said, you mean to tell me the purpose of affirmative action is not to make amends and it's not to address grievances.
That's just your selling point.
He said, for all intents and purposes, yeah.
It was to forever make the playing field unlevel Because this was the price America had to pay for the way it was founded.
America had to pay this price, and it was always for the rest of its days going to pay the price.
So all of these concessions that are made to the grievance industry never ever get anywhere near solving the supposed so-called problem.
You can find examples of male-female inequality everywhere you want to go.
And you can find many examples where it is men on the short end of the stick.
One area would be child custody.
Another area would be divorce court.
There's any number of places where you could make the case that the advantage is all with women.
And you'd have just as many people shrieking that I don't know what I'm talking about when I say that.
But this whole notion of equality, that's what's bogus is not possible.
There's no such thing.
Just like fairness.
Fairness is ephemeral.
Women are victims when they get divorced.
Well, that's women are victims, period.
I mean, that's the whole point.
That's the justification for all of this.
Hell, pregnancy makes women a victim.
It makes them sick.
It gives them a disease.
If you listen to the right people.
Jim, I appreciate the call.
This is Greg in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
How are you doing?
Good.
I'm a longtime listener, second time caller, and I'm a business owner.
And I'd like to give you my perspective as to why the income inequality is nonsense.
Now, I own a small company, and I employ between 20 and 40 people, depending on the time of year it is, and 80% of them are men.
Now, currently I pay all of my staff exactly the same based on the job that they do.
But if I could pay women 72 cents on the dollar for what I pay men, I would fire all of my male employees and hire all women.
And guess who would get a raise as a result?
Me.
And I'm just a small employer.
Again, I only employ 20 to 40 people.
Can you imagine the savings in a big company like SAS or Glaxo or IBM?
So if they're paying men $100,000 a year and they can pay women $72,000 a year, well, good Lord, that's a $28,000 saving per employee.
I fire all the men and hire women.
There you go, folks.
Straight up and down, 100% economic common sense.
If you can get women for $28,000 a year less than men, fire the men.
Give yourself, the business owner, a raise.
But no, see, they want to tell you to exist because it's discrimination because you, Greg, you are part of the group conducting the war on women and you're purposely underpaying them because you know they'll accept it and you're favoring the men.
So what they're really telling you is that you enjoy overpaying the men.
If somebody will do the job for $72,000 a year, you're an idiot to pay somebody $100,000 to do it.
That's the rule of thumb, folks.
Look, you may not like hearing it that way.
But if somebody will do the job for $72,000 and it's the same job from person to person, you're an idiot if you're paying somebody $100,000.
This whole thing is hogwash anyway.
These stats, once again, don't mean as much as they could because they're static stats.
They don't explain the dynamics of any of this.
But I also like my idea, and let me rephrase it, as it particularly relates to Hollywood.
If the men in Hollywood, male leads, are being paid that much more than women, and Hollywood is the citadel of liberalism, where there is utopia, or we're soon to have it, where there's equality and fairness and equity and all this, then isn't it incumbent on the men to give back and to refuse that much more money than the women are being paid?
Not only would that be good feminism, that would be chivalrous.
So here you have the studio executive casting the movie, and he offers the male lead a million dollars, and the female lead is going to get $720,000.
Well, that's unfair.
That's unequal.
That's bias.
It's discrimination.
It's sexism.
It's bigotry.
It's all kind of the male lead should go to the studio honcho and say, I'm not going to let you get away with this unfairness.
I demand that you only pay me $720,000 a year so that what the female lead and I make are equal.
Isn't it incumbent on the male liberals of Hollywood to fix this themselves?
I mean, what business they got standing up bellyaching at us, pointing a finger at us for?
We're supposedly committing all these grievances and atrocities against women, where right in Hollywood we know that men are paid much more than women.
There are market reasons, as we discussed.
I got to take a timeout, folks, but we will be back.
Speaking of Rudy, I have some sound bites here.
Rudy, speech he made in Phoenix on February 13th, and he's talking about this.
Now, this is not the 21 speech last week.
This is February 13th, a Friday.
And Rudy called Obama a moron.
It said, Nethan Yahoo is a leader who fights for his people, unlike our president.
The media started noticing this one after the 21 speech surfaced last week.
Let's listen.
The president reformer who runs Iran, Rouhani, in 90 and 03 and 05 continued to enrich uranium while they had a standstill agreement with us.
He did it secretly and bragged about it, and we're negotiating with him.
This is like playing polka with a guy who cheated you twice before.
You know who does that?
A moron.
An agreement with Iran with regard to nuclear power should be very simple.
Iran should not be allowed to have any form of nuclear power.
All right, all right now.
Now, speaking of that, there's a piece for the AP today, and it looks like we have an agreement with them to allow Iran to phase in development of a nuclear weapon over the next 10 years.
The United States and Iran are working on a two-phase deal that clamps down on the nuclear program for at least a decade before providing Iran leeway over the remainder of the agreement to slowly ramp up activities that could be used to make weapons.
So we've got a 10-year supposed moratorium.
After that, the Iranians can go ahead and develop a nuke all they want.
That's the agreement AP is reporting that we have today.
And as Rudy said, anybody who would do that is a moron.
Next bite, Rudy, again at Phoenix on February 13th, compares Obama to the Prime Minister of Israel.
Are upset that Prime Minister Netanyahu wants to come here and defend his country?
When I was mayor of New York, if someone threatened to destroy New York City, I would go anywhere, any place, anytime, and I wouldn't give a damn what the president of the United States thought to defend my country.
That is a patriot.
That's a man who loves his people.
That's a man who protects his people.
That's a man who fights for his people, unlike our president.
See, they just this is right on the money, folks.
It's just as right on the money as the 21 speech, and they're just glomming on to this.
Here is the big finish.
I'm never going to have my 10 close friends that I lost on September 11th who were killed by Islamic extremists and terrorists.
Never going to have them ever again.
And I'm never going to have my 343 firefighters.
Never going to have them ever again.
We can't bring them back, but we can make sure there are more of them.
This president isn't doing it.
This president is moving us in a much worse and really frightening.
And Congress must stop it, and the people must stand up and say, no, no, no.
We will not sell out to Iran the way Chamberlain sold out to Hitler.
No!
Rudy Giuliani on February 13th again, not the 21 speech.
So now that's what you're going to condemn Rudy for what he's what'd he say?
He said I wasn't there.
I don't know.
People in New York talk a lot.
Leave me alone.
Man, oh man, it is indeed the fastest three hours in media.
I know that because two of them are already over.
But we've got more.
We always have more.
We'll be back with it before you know it.
▲
Export Selection