All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 29, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:49
January 29, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey folks, I may have spoken too soon on this dynamic scoring business.
Greetings.
Welcome back.
Rushlin Baugh, America's real anchor man and truth detector and doctor of democracy all combined in one harmless, lovable little fuzzball package, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes.
A telephone number if you want to be on the program's 800-282-2882.
In one of this, from thehill.com, in one of their first moves upon taking power in Congress, the Republicans instructed the CBO to adopt dynamic scoring when evaluating the budgetary impacts of new legislation.
This is the type of issue that only a Beltway insider could love, but the priority that Republicans put on this move indicates the high value politicians place on controlling the numbers attached to the assessment of public policy.
So, as it says here, under dynamic scoring, the CBO would estimate changes to the macro economy as a result of a tax change and then incorporate those changes in their estimates of the budgetary impact of whatever new tax policy has been proposed.
Makes all the sense in the world to do it.
But even so, the dynamic scoring is still a little bit of a guess and an estimate, although there's historical behavior as a guide that you can use, but it clearly makes far more sense than the static analysis.
Static analysis is worthless.
Static analysis does not take into account any human behavior or human nature whatsoever.
So I might have spoken too soon.
The Republicans have said they're going to start incorporating this in any future calculations made by the CBO.
Folks, it's great to have you with us here as we head on down towards Super Bowl.
What number?
Is this Super Bowl 49?
Super Bowl 49.
I've lost track of the ability to count the Roman numerals.
Not that I ever did know that.
But it's, okay, so it's 49.
And so everybody's, Bratom Brady has a cold.
Marshawn Lynch is still not talking.
And wearing unapproved hats.
Might be subject to $100,000 fine.
It's typical Super Bowl pre-publicity and so forth as we get ready for the big game.
Now, Grab Audio Sunday 32.
I've got more on Scott Walker here, but I want to spread this out.
I want to spread the Scott Walker stuff out.
And let me make something very clear.
I haven't endorsed Scott Walker or anybody else as per usual.
I don't endorse, particularly this far out.
I mean, we don't even have any real official candidates here.
But even if we did, that's not what happens on this program by policy.
There's some things that Scott Walker, I'm getting emails.
No, hey, you better be careful.
You know, Scott Walker is not exactly good on immigration rush.
You don't want to embarrass yourself here by going overboard at night.
Folks, everything's cool here.
My point about Scott Walker is I thought what everybody out there, I thought all of you were so upset about.
I know I have been.
My whole point is that defeating the left, I mean, it's not easy, but clearly it can be done.
And when it's done using conservatism with the right candidate done the right way, it wins.
And the Republican Party's not even interested in that, as we've documented and discussed.
My only point about Scott Walker is: if you want to beat back the left, there's a guy that's done it.
And he's done it against all odds.
He has written the blueprint how to do it.
And I thought that's why we were all here: to restore this country and beat back the left and their desired transformation of this country.
And Scott Walker has shown how to do it in the belly of the beast.
He hasn't done it from a think tank.
He hasn't done it from position papers and theses and all this.
He hasn't done it as a consultant.
He's done it with his name and reputation on the line.
He's done it as a candidate, as a sitting governor campaigning for reelection.
He's done it.
He's shown how it can happen.
And it's not even tied to geography.
Yeah, Wisconsin's a northern plains state, but it's a blue state.
The unions ran that state.
That's who he had to take on and beat back, along with the media.
And he had to take every illegal act they tried, every act of personal destruction against him and his family.
My point is, for 25 years, I've been gotten phone calls, I've been receiving phone calls.
Why don't the Republicans do that?
Why don't the Republicans?
There's your answer.
Scott Walker has been doing everything you wish the Republican Party at large has been doing in terms of beating back the opposition, in terms of taking them on, beating them back, showing how to do it, and succeeding at doing it.
There's the blueprint.
Not even that complicated.
Anyway, the media hasn't yet zeroed in on him full-time.
The Wisconsin media did to a certain extent that the national media, but now they are going to start focusing because of his speech Saturday and the brand new attention he's getting outside.
What are you laughing at?
What in the world is so funny?
What now?
Okay.
I just called it.
I just predicted it.
And then you got me a caller.
Somebody.
Well, just make sure it does.
It's a guy Josh and Josh Decatur, Alabama.
Hold on.
Do not go away, Josh.
And I have not endorsed Walker.
I just made that point.
I've said the same kind of things about Ted Cruz over and over and over again.
I've said many of the same things, not quite the same verve and energy about Mike Lee.
I've said roaringly good, positive things about Rick Perry over the.
So I'm not endorsed anybody.
At any rate, Romney has become the focus now, the drive-bys again, because he's let it be known that he's looking at maybe running again.
Folks, it's hilarious to watch the drive-by.
As I mentioned, the Washington Post on the web has got this little interactive game you can play.
They've got Mitt Romney, one of his mansions.
I don't know which one.
I didn't read all one of his mansions.
He's got an 11,000 square foot place in La Jolla.
It's not this one in the Washington Post because this one's bigger than that.
And he's got a place in Boston.
And I think he's got a place in Utah somewhere.
He's got houses.
Mitt Romney likes to live in different houses.
He's out there.
He's earned the money to do so.
Big whoop.
Well, no, not big whoop.
The Washington Post thinks this is horrible.
It's terrible.
It's out of touch.
And they have an interactive little game you can play.
They have the Romney blueprint, all three floors of one of his mansions.
And you can input the square footage of your domicile, be it a condominium, be it an apartment, be it your shopping cart, your own house.
You can input the square footage, or if you don't know what that is, there are other ways you can input the size of your house.
And that size will be superimposed over Mitt Romney's blue plan or blueprint floor plan of his house.
I did it.
I tried it.
I put in the size of my house, and it's a giant blue overlay.
In my case, the blue overlay was bigger than the Romney blueprints, which I'm sure is not what the Washington Post intends.
The media did go after McCain's houses.
They did go.
I mean, you couldn't, after a while, you couldn't read that.
McCain had eight different condos.
Remember?
Eight different apartments, condominiums, and houses.
And what was funny, McCain didn't even know he had them all.
Remember, it wanted, you know, I have these things in my wife.
I'm in my wife's niche, so I don't care.
What are you asking me for?
He didn't even know he had as many as he had.
Theoretically, Romney knows how many he has.
The Washington Post found one, got the floor plan.
Public record, you can get the floor plan, the details of anybody's house you want.
Well, from the architect and the design, if it has to go any kind of approval process and any kind of architectural approval, environmental approval, yeah, you can, it's all public record.
You can find these things, and that's what they did.
And they've just got this little game.
You put in, they figure most people live in a 1200 or 1,400 square foot place, 5,000 way.
You input your size, and your house by designing this thing is going to be dwarfed by Romney's.
That's the whole point, to show how big only one of Romney's houses is in your shack in comparison.
And then you're supposed to conclude that Romney hates you and it doesn't care about you.
Remember, the exit poll question, 2012, cares about people like me.
Obama won that when 81 to 19.
Well, the media is not going to let that go, so they're trying that.
And exactly right, puts his dog in the roof of the family station wagon on family vacation.
How can you like the guy?
Yeah, and that's another thing.
Some guy that worked for Romney's wife died, and Romney didn't care.
Yeah, a guy's wife got cancer or something.
The media is out, and they can't wait to rev this stuff all up again.
Now, my obvious conclusion is: okay, where's the blueprints for the Kennedy compound?
How about the combined properties and homes of Nancy Pelosi?
They would never, ever endeavor to have people compare the size of their homes with where a Democrat, a wealthy Democrat lives.
How about the combined square footage of the Clinton estates?
They got a place in Georgetown.
They got a place in Chappaqua.
Clinton lives in the second floor of the library and massage parlor down there.
And why not, and they all spend a lot of time at Jeffrey Epstein's places.
Why not get a blueprint of the floor plan of Jeffrey Epstein's houses and show where all the so-called massages and stuff went on and have you overlay your house and the size of your massage room with Jeffrey Epstein's where Clinton and the boys hung out?
But they'll never do anything like that, of course.
So they're revving up on Romney, and then they don't have that kind of thing to attack Scott Walker on, so they'll have to come up with other things.
In addition to that, the forehead was on CNN today on the program called Newsroom, and the Infobabe named Kate Baldwin was interviewing the forehead.
He's a Democrat strategist still.
Hey, did you know, I saw something today that I didn't know.
Did you know that Carville, James Carville, was a Fox News analyst?
I didn't either.
He's been a Fox News analyst for the last year, and the only reason I knew that is because he quit today.
Or he's no longer one.
I don't know if he did that when your contract had ended or if he resigned or whatever.
I didn't even know he was one.
Well, he was at CNN.
I remember him leaving CNN somewhere.
I just, maybe it's in the back of my mind he'd gone to Fox as a, you know, one of their commentators or analysts, but I didn't recall it.
And I saw today that he's not there anymore.
Anyway, his partner is the forehead.
Carville and McGalo in the war room, and they do polling together and all kinds of stuff.
Partners in liberal Democrat crime.
And so they got the forehead on today on CNN, along with a Republican strategist named Doug High.
And they're talking about Romney maybe running for president again.
And Kate Baldwin says, hey, Paul, it sounds like when you're starting to eat barbecue in Mississippi, you have to be running for something.
Also taking on Hillary Clinton pretty hard, Mitt Romney.
What's going on here, Paul?
First, congratulations to those engineers.
The technology behind those animatronic dolls that make them so lifelike that when they recharge their lithium-iode batteries, they actually look like they're eating.
God bless them.
You know, I advise the pro-Obama super PAC, and we ran millions of dollars worth of ads attacking Mitt Romney.
So I have a bias here.
Still, here's my bias.
Run, Mitt, run.
We know how to beat you.
We'll do it again if you run again.
It seems really pathetic, frankly, when a candidate, as the Washington Post said this morning, has to rebrand himself as authentic.
Well, when you're rebranding as authentic, you're probably not very authentic.
All right.
Fine and dandy.
You've got to rebrand yourself as authentic.
You're probably not authentic.
But what is Hillary Clinton doing?
Has anybody seen her?
You know, she's had two public appearances in the last, what is it, six weeks, two months?
She is off the grid.
And everybody knows why.
One of the reasons she's off the grid is they're doing some work.
Lots of different kinds of work.
The second reason she's off the grid is the more Hillary is seen and the more she is heard, the more her approval number drops.
It's uncanny.
The less people see and hear of Hillary Clinton, the higher her numbers go.
So she's being sequestered.
But I have the details.
In fact, I have a whole stack here on the latest stuff involving women in our culture.
First off, Chris Starwald at Fox News.
Hillary retreats deeper into cocoon with the conventional wisdom on the left congealing against the idea of even a symbolic challenge to Hillary Clinton's march to the Democrat nomination.
Her team is now publicly toying with the idea of continuing to delay the official launch until the middle of the summer.
In what appears to be a rebuttal to the staff assumptions from a Democrat familiar with Clinton's thinking, they're saying the actual kickoff would not be until July.
Clinton would submit to partial scrutiny from the FEC starting in April.
But she would keep most of her operation off the books until the beginning of July.
They just keep moving this announcement of hers back, folks.
The stated reason, get this.
The candidate wants to develop her message, develop her policy, and develop her organization.
Yeah, because what, the previous 15 years of running for president, serving in the Senate, serving as Secretary of State, serving as First Lady, haven't given her enough time to nail it all down?
So the forehead saying, well, Mitt Romney, if you have to rebrand yourself as authentic, then you must not be very authentic.
Well, by the same talking, Mr. Bergella, if Hillary Clinton has to go into deep hiding to develop her message and to develop her policy and organization, what the hell has she been doing since 1992?
She shouldn't have to develop a message.
It should have been a consistent one that everybody already should know.
Same thing with policy.
It sounds to me like they're trying to construct something inauthentic for her because that may be the only way she can win.
Hey, before we head back to the phones, grab somebody 33.
This is Doug High.
This is the Republican consultant Zoom with a forehead unseen and the forehead just ripped into Romney.
Hey, if you got to rebrand yourself as authentic, you're probably not very authentic.
And look, I'm telling you, if Mrs. Clinton's got to go in and have months and months of privacy to concoct policy positions and all this other stuff, then it sounds to me like what they're trying to do is make her inauthentic.
I think that the challenge the Democrats have with Hillary Clinton is to convince everybody she's somebody she's not.
The only hope she's got, this business of authentic, inauthentic.
Anyway, here's what Doug High had to say.
After Bagala said that Romney's not authentic, this is what the Republican guy said.
Look, candidates always want to be authentic, whether that's real authenticity or fake authenticity.
Right.
Okay, so real authenticity or fake authenticity.
You realize there's no such thing as fake authenticity.
Fake authenticity is inauthentic.
But that's just me, folks.
You know, I'm a stickler for words.
The key is that Mrs. Clinton, that's why they got her sequestered.
She's got too much of a history that everybody could remember, particularly Secretary of State as totally incompetent.
First lady, horrible senator, no record of any sort, and so forth.
It's a mess.
They've got to straighten out what everybody knows and try to convince people that what they know about Hillary isn't who Hillary really is.
You can beat up on Romney all you want, but the bigger task here is Mrs. Clinton.
And I don't think it's going to come down to either one of those two if you want to know the truth.
That's just me.
But all this is just a giant circle.
You know what?
I don't think it's going to come down to either of these two.
When the rubber hits the road, we'll see.
Here's Josh in Decatur, Alabama.
Josh, we're not going to get you all in in this segment.
We're going to get started, though.
What's up?
Hey, Rush.
It's really a pleasure.
I've been listening to you for 15 years.
Great to have you with us, my buddy.
How are you?
You're the man, and I just know you said you didn't endorse him, quote unquote, but you've all been endorsed Walker.
And I just got to ask, I'm a confessed cruise.
I'm in the tank for Cruz.
I told Snardly I'm a cruise seminar caller.
But what do we, what about Walker on Common Core and Amnesty?
What's your take on that?
Well, see, this is why I've endorsed Walker, and I didn't say it's perfect.
And I did not get into anything specifically policy.
He beat the left by being conservative and fearless and taking them on and not trying to become a partial liberal.
He didn't do it by being cooperative and working together with them.
He's not perfect, and that's why I didn't endorse him.
I haven't endorsed anybody.
Now, hang on out there, Josh.
Don't go away.
Hey, we're back.
Rush Limboy here at the distinguished and prestigious Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
And back to Josh in Decatur, Alabama.
You were very bold, Josh, unabashed.
Ted Cruz, seminar caller.
Now, how long have you been listening to the program?
Years?
About 15 years.
Okay, then you know.
You have heard me rave and rave about Ted Cruz, have you not?
Yes, yes.
And I totally agree.
Walker makes a very compelling case.
What Walker does is supply a blueprint.
That really is my.
And so does Ted Cruz, but Ted Cruz doesn't.
Is it the governor thing?
Is that what it is?
No.
Well, partially it's a governor thing, but Cruz, look, Cruz has won his own battles, and he's fearless.
He does not back down from either.
He's never wavered.
Nope.
He doesn't waver.
And if you're going to have a conservative scorecard, he's going to probably be 100% on the thing.
When it comes to anything you care about, amnesty, social issues, you name it, Cruz is going to be right there.
I would love if Ted Cruz be elected president.
But Walker has been, for the most part, laboring in obscurity despite all this success.
He has done.
I think probably of all Republican candidates outside of presidential campaigns, Scott Walker has had more thrown at him consistently than any Republican out there and has not.
He slayed the dragons.
I give you that.
He totally slayed the Union Dragon.
All right.
Now, stick with me here because you're going to end up happy here, Josh.
And I know that's why you called.
You feel let down by your radio show today.
And I'm not going to let you hang up here having that be your lingering thought as you head into the rest of your day.
Oh, and wouldn't that be?
Because I'm going to tell you why I think.
You want boldness?
You want honesty?
You want to know why Fox News did a segment on me touting Scott Walker?
Why do you think they did it?
I don't know.
You tell me.
You said it.
You said it in your opening criticism of me or your not criticism, but your complaint.
They want an endorsement.
No, it's immigration.
They touted me touting Walker because that puts me touting a guy who is not quite an open borders guy, but he's not really opposed to doing this amnesty for the illegals already here.
He's still, he's got a very, he's really good on closing the border.
He's excellent on border security, but he's also got a position here on Obama's executive amnesty that bothers some people.
He's certainly not as solid on that as your guy, Ted Cruz, is.
And Cruz is a rock star.
I mean, you're talking about great with the speech.
I mean, did you hear Cruz's speech at Iowa?
Yeah.
It was great.
It was great, too.
Every speech Cruz gives is great.
But the Republican Party is as afraid of Cruz as they were Palin.
Yeah.
And I think Walker's a little dry, and so that's another edge to Cruz.
I think I'll take Walker the VP.
Well, that's magnanimous of you.
Now, that's what kind of compromise this party needs.
I'll take my amnesty guy on the VEP side, but I don't want him getting a big show.
I got you on that.
Josh, thanks for the call.
Appreciate it.
Look, I'm under no illusions here.
Let's be frank.
Cable news could highlight things that I say every night if they wanted to.
I mean, let's call it what.
It's not that things are something happens here that's so unique it's newsworthy because everything that happens here is newsworthy.
But I'm not under any illusions here.
The Republican establishment is pro-amnesty.
There's no question about it.
And if you look at Scott Walker, that would be the one area where people would have red flags going up.
And so here comes Fox News.
Amen Walker.
Big bump from Rush Limbaugh.
Does that matter?
Oh, yeah, that could be exactly what he needs.
Big push, big push.
With Dr. Krauthammer and O'Reilly both agreeing.
And it's right in there is one of the reasons I'm convinced.
And it could be wrong.
It doesn't matter either way.
Don't anybody tell anybody I'm mad about anything.
I'm not mad.
I don't get mad over things like this.
It's not useful.
It's just, to me, it's fascinating.
But I think that's one of the reasons why all of a sudden I'm not an albatross.
All of a sudden, I'm not a problem for the Republicans.
All of a sudden, why the Republicans are free to be happy with a positive mention from me all of a sudden in this case.
You think I've got a point on this, Mr. Snerdley?
Absolutely.
There's no question about it.
It doesn't diminish anything I said about Scott Walker, but I'm glad old Josh called here because I've made it clear as I can that I'm not endorsing anybody.
Look, folks, what I want is whatever.
Do you know how – I'm not even going to ask you.
I'm just going to tell you, I am a combination mad, ticked off, and frustrated, like you can't believe, of being led everywhere we look in this country by a minority.
The left is a functioning minority in this country, and I'm sick and tired of our side being afraid of it.
I'm tired of our side afraid to stand up for what they know and really believe.
I'm tired of our side unwilling to stand up and show this contrast and draw this great distinction that exists between us and I'm so fed up with this belief that we have got to join amnesty in order to win.
I'm fed up with all this, that we were not elected to stop Obama, but rather to make Washington work.
All of this stuff just really, it just frustrates and angers me to no end.
Now, coming here and being mad and frustrated every day, nobody wants to hear that.
But with Scott Walker, my whole point has been ever since I've been touting the guy, there's the blueprint about how to beat him back.
Now, it was a governor's race.
I do not know to what extent immigration, illegal immigration, amnesty factored in the campaign.
What I do know is that Scott Walker was personally targeted on education and unions.
They tried to destroy him every which way possible.
We want winners, do we not?
And they keep talking about these same moderate Northeastern Republicans that the donor class likes to get behind, but they don't win.
It'd be great if they did, but they don't win.
McCain didn't win.
Romney didn't win, and they're not going to.
They may be fine men.
They probably are.
Probably very, in Romney, I don't think you can find a more solid citizen.
But Romney, I give you a classic.
Romney all of a sudden found it necessary earlier this week or last week to publicly announce that he is now changed his mind on global warming and he's one of the people now that believes man is negatively impacting, destroying the climate.
Why would you do that?
Who in the hell are you trying to get votes from by doing that?
We're not going to win by trying to siphon off liberals.
You know where that thinking comes from?
That comes from the idea that we are second class.
It comes from the defensive posture that the minority in this country actually is the majority.
These people must think that the left and the Democrat Party are the majority of everything, and we're going to have to get some of those people if we're going to win.
And the only way to get some of those people is to say a couple things that they agree with.
We just can't be totally different.
We don't have a prayer.
And it just totally misses the boat.
And it is not an accurate picture of reality.
Presidential turnouts are what they are.
You can't deny Obama's last two election victories, but you can explain why Romney lost this second one a lot.
Let's put it this way.
Romney had a far better chance of beating Obama in 12 than McCain ever did in eight and squandered it.
Obama could have been defeated.
The 2010 turnout, the 2014 turnout, those midterm election turnouts, it is clear where the people who care enough in this country to show up and vote stand.
And it's not with the Democrat Party and it's not with Obama and it's not with his agenda.
And it's not people who want to work with that agenda and activate, implement maybe a little of it here and a little of it there.
People want Obamacare gotten rid of.
They want no amnesty, particularly by virtue of executive order.
They revere the Constitution and they want it revered by the people who are elected as stewards.
They don't want dictators, authoritarians.
They don't want people who are going to reach and grab for far more executive power than it's permitted.
They want, and this is the vast majority of people in this country, if presented, this is the point.
Walker presented a total contrast in a blue state and won three times.
Look, I'm going to stop mentioning this because it's going to start irritating those of you who hear it all the time.
But you do have to say things over and over again sometimes for them to make an imprint on people.
I'm telling you, the point with me about Scott Walker, the blueprint, that's how it's done.
It shows it can be done, by the way.
Not just how, but it works.
And I don't think he's a dryball like everybody's trying to intimate with this business, hey, where'd this guy go to get a charisma transplant?
It's going to be an interesting campaign from a lot of standpoints.
But I'll tell you what's going to boil down to.
And this is going to be a real challenge, I think, for people.
For people like Josh, the perfect candidate doesn't exist.
There isn't a single Republican who scores 100 on everything.
Right?
There's single issue crowds out there.
Every issue has their single issue people in there.
And no matter what candidate you nominate, there's going to be a constituency group that isn't going to like him or her.
Now, normally it is the left that gets everybody in trouble in their pursuit of perfection.
Now, the left believes that people can be perfected and that institutions can be perfected and that businesses can be perfected.
And that is the root of their major evil and problem, this endless quest for perfection when it's simply impossible.
But by the same token, people on the right, conservatives, Republicans, whatever, by the same token demand a perfect candidate in terms of this issue, that issue, that issue, and I don't think that candidate exists.
And so there's going to be fallout during any kind of a primary and a campaign.
Anyway, I'm a little long.
I have to take a break.
We're going to be developing all of these theories as the days unfold.
So we've by no means gotten to the end of any of it.
Sit tight.
We'll be right back.
Now, just one more thing in this Scott Walker business, just so nobody misunderstands, because I am totally into being a top-notch professional communicator.
I think it was just as though, or just as it was I on this program who explained over and over again, detail after detail, about 529 and Obama's plans to cancel the tax cut for the middle class in it.
And they canceled it.
By the same token, folks, the Republican Party, the RNC, Republican National Committee, Republican Consultants, you name it, nobody in Republican Party officialdom was touting what Scott Walker had done.
And I thought it needed to be touted.
I thought it was phenomenal.
And I thought it was crucial that people know it.
You realize how many Republicans there are, voters, who are depressed thinking we can't win because the deck is so stacked against us?
The media, Hollywood, music, books, TV shows, the news.
Wherever you turn, the left dominates it.
The campus, the academy.
They think we can't win.
They're depressed.
They're down on the dumps.
The Republican Party's not out there saying, yes, we can win.
Look at our guy in Wisconsin.
So I decided to do it.
Plain and simple.
I think people needed to know.
I still think it's phenomenal what he did.
And the fact that there's still, you know, it didn't even become a factor until he finally shows up and speaks outside Wisconsin at this conservative confab in Iowa last Saturday.
However it happened, find him dandy with me.
I just think you needed to know.
I think people need to know they can be beat.
I think people need to know there's a way to beat Democrats.
There's a way to beat the left.
It's called conservatism.
It works most every time it tries.
It's tried on the national stage.
Anyway, back to the phones.
Larry in Woodburn, Oregon.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Good morning, Rush.
Hey, real privilege to talk to you.
Thank you.
I'm glad that you took my call, and thanks for taking my call.
Yes, sir.
Deep condolences for the loss of Mr. Kit Carson there.
I heard your show on Monday, and I'm sorry for you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
My question is kind of embarrassing, actually.
Snertley gave me a bit of the business there because he thought I was joking.
Proud member of the Rush Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, but I'm here raising my hand.
Rush, the distinction that the left is trying to make between Islamic terrorists, Islamic extremists, and extremists acting in the name of Islam.
What distinction are they trying to make?
I'm missing the point.
I'm missing what they're trying to get me to think these people are other than what they are.
I'll be happy to explain it to you because you understand it.
You know.
You just can't believe it.
Here's what they're doing.
This distinction is saying they are terrorists in the name of Islam instead of Islamist extremists or Islamist terrorism.
It's terrorism in the name of Islam.
What they're trying to do, Larry, is tell you that these are not Islamists.
They are terrorists.
They're criminals.
They're bad guys.
They're like people that hold up the 7-Eleven with a gun and maybe kill people.
But they're not Islamists.
They're lying about it.
They're making it up.
They're impugning Islam.
They're not really Muslims.
They're not really Islamists.
They weren't trained in mosques.
They don't hold any Imam out as a hero.
They're just renegades.
And they made to look like terrorists, so you'll think they are, but they're really not.
That's what they want everybody to believe.
That's why they're drawing the distinction.
They actually want you to believe that these are just renegade criminals that happen to live in the Middle East and have decided to put on the uniform of a terrorist.
And then they go out and commit acts of terror and then claim that they're from ISIS or claim that they are from the new Khorasan group or claim they're from al-Qaeda.
And what our regime wants you to believe is they're lying.
Well, they're committing the atrocities.
No doubt about that.
But Islam is a religion of peace.
And these people are making a mockery of it and impugning.
They are lying.
That's what they want you to believe.
That's the stretch.
You understand that.
You just don't think anybody can be serious about trying that.
But that's what they're doing.
All right, folks, that's it for this exciting, busy broadcast hour.
Much more straight ahead, much more left to go.
You hang in there and be tough.
And we will be back before you know it.
▲
Export Selection