All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:36
January 20, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
I have never, and I shouldn't say this, I have never cared about a State of the Union address less than the one I care about today.
In fact, my temptation is not even to discuss it, because to discuss it is to fall prey to the whole narrative the drive-by media is setting up, which is it's the most important thing in the news today.
And I'm sorry, I don't believe the, they're not state of the union speeches anymore.
All they are are empty promises.
They're nothing, there's nothing about the state of the union in this.
There's nothing what it was traditionally meant to be.
And it hasn't been for a while.
I understand that.
It's just a, it's, it's a wish lit, well, it's a, it's a vote-buying scheme is what the whole thing is.
And it's an insult to intelligence and all that.
And you realize that 90% of the stuff that is, well, promised or suggested or offered as a serious intention never happens anyway.
It never comes to pass.
And yet here we are.
The drive-by media is as excited as they've ever been about anything because it's something that's standard operating procedure, president state of the union, show up, make it out to be the biggest thing in the world.
And maybe at one time it was.
And I will, maybe I'm getting cynical.
I don't know.
That doesn't mean, folks, I'm not going to watch it.
I'm going to watch it because it's my job.
I'm just telling you, I'm as...
Who wants to sit there and look at TV for an hour and 15 minutes and be lied to?
Who wants to sit and look at TV for an hour and 15 minutes and do nothing but get frustrated?
Have to take notes, mental or otherwise.
But the main thing is, is falling prey to what I have often referred to here as the daily soap opera script.
You know, get looped into it and participating in it, even though it's, I don't know, it's not even, it's not that it isn't real, it's that it is, you know, it's the establishment, pomp and circumstance and doing what the establishment does.
And it's basically a night where we're all told how wonderful government is, how great government is, how much bigger and greater government is, how much more compassionate government can be, how much more compassionate and giving government's going to be.
And none of it ever matters.
Positively, or very little of it does.
And then we got, we're going to have the guests up there, guests of Muchel Obama sitting up in the gallery.
We're going to have a dreamer.
We're going to have a couple illegal immigrants.
We're going to have some people that escape Cuba.
I don't know, folks.
It probably doesn't help that it's this regime in charge of it.
Anyway, despite all of that, it's great to have you here.
It always is.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
The telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882.
Email address, lrushbaugh at eibnet.com.
You know, we've been talking about Selma quite a bit lately.
And amazingly, audio soundbites, the first one, two, three, four, like, yeah, first four soundbites are all about what happened on CBS this morning or extra last night about Oprah going to Selma and how Dr. King looking down from above would judge it, what he would think of it.
And it's all made me think.
You know, yesterday I said that there aren't enough people actually pronouncing the name Selma with enough soul.
You have to say it with a lot of soul, a lot of sympathy, a lot of sadness.
Selma.
In the middle, you could be talking as normally as anything.
When the word Selma comes up, you could be talking just like this, and you have to say the word, and it comes Selma.
That's how the Reverend Sharpton says it, and John Lewis and all that.
I've got a different idea for Oprah.
She needs to say it an entirely different way.
The more I thought about it, probably make more sense for Oprah to pronounce it sell more.
And then we've got to sell more tickets.
Because Silma is still the worst box office performer of all the best picture nominees, despite it having been a Martin Luther King Jr. weekend.
I mean, it's not, and even on CBS this morning, they all gang up on Harvey Weinstein as the most powerful man in Hollywood for influencing Oscar votes and not caring enough to get behind the movie.
It's not, the old ads of it's not a great day for the left.
I mean, they really thought this was going to smoke everything.
And you add to that the fact that American Sniper is cleaning up and they are livid.
You see, they think in a straight heads-up comparison, Selma should be obliterating American Sniper.
And of course, it's the other way around.
I've even got a story in the stack here.
Get this.
You know why American Sniper is doing well?
You know why?
Because there's a legion of conservatives who have finally decided to leave home and go to the movies.
That's why.
Yes, conservatives are making American Sniper what it is, as though that delegitimites it or delegitimizes it.
Yeah, if it weren't for conservatives seeing a political message and something patriotic and a flaggish about it, why it wouldn't be doing anywhere near as well as it's doing.
It's almost as though conservatives are not really a natural part of the American political scene, just like man to the global warming people is not really a part of nature.
It's fascinating to watch these people on the left try to explain away the success of American Sniper while they snipe at it at the same time.
Hey, quick little pop quiz.
Who said this?
For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
Who said that?
I'll give you a hint.
It was said in 2010.
I'll give you a second hint.
It was said from the Oval Office.
If you guessed Obama, you're right.
On June 15th, and I'm just offering this as an opportunity.
I want you to keep this in mind as you listen to the State of the Union show tonight.
On June 15th, 2010, the president, Barack Hussein-O, addressed the nation about the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
And the president was wrong.
The president was phenomenally wrong.
He said, for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.
Time and again, the path forward has been blocked, not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.
The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight.
Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America.
Each day we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil.
And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.
We cannot consign our children to this future.
For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
He was dead wrong.
He is so wrong.
Have you seen the numbers on the economy, the approval numbers on the economy?
People are way up.
They think the economy is going great.
And this is the reason why gasoline prices are down.
By the way, there's a dirty little secret about why gasoline prices are down, too.
And I don't see a whole lot of people figuring it out.
No.
Well, it's partially the Saudis, but that's not the primary reason that the price of oil is plummeting and the primary reason the price of gasoline is plummeting.
But my point here is that Obama, and he wasn't alone, was dead wrong.
By the way, that BP oil spill, what was it?
Just a couple of weeks later, they couldn't find the oil?
All that oil had spilled.
They couldn't find it.
Remember that?
Remember the controversy?
They couldn't figure out where it went.
So we got all these cockami stories.
Well, you know, it sank or did something, but it's out there.
It's polluting.
No, it's just that it was eaten.
It was eaten by seawater.
Powerful stuff, seawater.
But anyway, the president said, for decades, we've known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
And look at us now.
The price of gasoline, average across the country, $2.14.
That means in some places across the country, it's under $2.
And right on schedule, what are governments doing?
Belly aching.
Yep, tax revenue plummeting.
Uh-oh, need some emergency action.
Raise taxes on gasoline.
Because in some places, it isn't.
The federal tax is static.
It's 18 cents no matter what.
But states, sometimes the tax rate floats.
And revenue may not be the same when the gas price plummets like it's doing.
Now, the real reason that, and this is the unspoken reason, and it's not the sole reason, but one of the leading or primary reasons why the price of oil is down and gasoline is demand.
Demand is down.
And the demand is down because the U.S. economy's in the tank.
92.8 million Americans not working, fewer and fewer people traveling.
You won't find very many experts acknowledge this because it contradicts the idea that the economy is roaring back.
It's not just the Saudis artificially lowering the price, trying to damage fracking and all that.
I mean, they can do only so much, but the power of the U.S. economy can either add to that or overcome that, depending on how many other oil-producing outfits participate with the Saudis.
But the demand being down is a massive factor here that nobody's talking about.
And the fascinating thing or interesting thing about that is the demand is down because the U.S. economy is not chugging along.
The U.S. economy is not going gangbusters.
Contrary to what the Washington establishment and drive-by media and everybody else would have you believe.
Let me take a quick time out.
We'll come back, review some past State of the Union stuff just to show you what I mean about how so little of what is proposed in States of the Union actually ever comes to pass.
Don't go away.
America's real anchor man, doctor of democracy, America's truth detector, all combined here, one harmless, lovable little fuzzball bundle, Il Papa, the Pope, all over the news again today.
It was in the news yesterday, one of the days last week didn't get to, been saving it all up.
Today is the day we dissect it all.
From the Washington Times, the headline, Obama has worst State of the Union records since Gerald Ford.
Judging by his recent history, it doesn't really matter what Obama says in tonight's State of the Union show.
Congress is going to ignore him anyway.
Mr. Obama has the second worst record of getting his State of the Union policy requests enacted into law of any president in the last 50 years.
This, according to an analysis by a couple of scholars, puts Obama only above the unelected two-year presidency of Gerald Ford.
Now, you might look at this as good news.
I'm not sure the country is going to survive with Obama getting much more of what he proposed in these speeches because he's proposed the sink and everything else.
But see, we're not out of the woods yet because these last two years, I don't think we've, I don't think we've begun to see even half of what's headed our way in these last two years.
And I know I've said this over and over again, so I'm not going to beat the dead horse, but the Republicans have made it clear they're not going to take any steps to stop him.
And he's got two years to complete this fundamental transformation.
And it's clear the Constitution is an impediment or an obstacle that he doesn't think is a serious one now.
He's not going to have much trouble going past it.
So this State of the Union address, it isn't going to matter whether Congress authorizes some of this stuff or not.
What's to stop him from doing it?
You might say, well, he just can't go out and raise taxes, willy-nilly.
I mean, you've got to have Congress do that via legislation.
Don't reject this just out of hand.
I mean, there's so many things going on now that people said were not possible because of the Constitution.
There's so many violations of the Constitution taking place now, and it's become something that happens with such regularity that people have stopped noticing and have just begun to accept it.
Even on our side, they say, well, that's just what Obama's doing.
And as usual, we have to wait till he's gone to address any of this.
We have to wait till he's served out his term, and then whoever's next elected will begin the process of reversing some of this stuff.
But that isn't going to be easy either, because Obama's not just going to leave town and let everything he's done transform the country be unraveled.
That's one of the reasons why he's going to maintain a home in Washington.
But all that's for down the road.
It's a fact that he has promised time and again to do a whole bunch of things, and very little of it has actually happened.
But now, in these last two years, where he's not concerned whether Congress goes along and passes anything, we'll just have to keep a sharp eye.
Now, what will, you know what, presidents, when they go to the State of the Union show, they try to list and rattle off their accomplishments from, say, over the last year or during their presidential terms.
So what will Obama point to as his accomplishments since the last State of the Union show?
Is he going to brag about the rise of ISIS?
Is he going to brag about how we've lost Iraq and we're on the brink of losing Afghanistan?
Do you see that ISIS killed 13 young boys because they watched a soccer game?
Yeah, so is Obama going to talk about how he has stopped the rise of ISIS?
Is he going to brag about how we've lost Iraq?
He's going to brag about we're on the brink of losing Afghanistan.
Is he going to brag about freeing dozens of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay?
Is he going to brag about trading five of the worst of them for a man who may have deserted his post?
That would be Bergdahl.
Is Obama going to brag about swapping five Cuban terrorists, a couple of whom were actually convicted of murder for some American hostages the Castro's were holding for bargaining chips?
I mean, yeah, he's got a lot to brag about here, doesn't he?
Is he going to brag about 92.8 million Americans not working?
Is he going to brag about the absolute mess that healthcare.gov has been from the get-go?
Is he going to brag about all the states that he has sued who have attempted to pass legislation in those states to enforce already existing immigration laws?
Is he going to brag about how he has stopped deporting almost anyone except the most hardened criminals?
Is he going to brag about getting to the bottom of the IRS targeting of the Tea Party?
Is he going to brag about getting to the bottom of what happened at Benghazi?
Is he going to brag about finally finding out what happened at the VA scandals and straightening that out?
Or is he going to skip listing all of these accomplishments and just move on to listing even more ways he wants to buy votes for Democrats in the future?
Again, study out today by a couple of scholars reports that Obama actually has the second worst State of the Union success rate for any president over the last 50 years.
And that would be Gerald Ford, who wasn't even elected.
Look at what Gerald Ford faced.
Gerald Ford faced a country in the media still wallowing in Watergate.
Ford's success rate was 28%.
Obama's is 30%.
30% of what Obama has proposed has actually happened.
And it's going to be probably more of the same tonight.
And don't forget that for two years of his tenure, Obama even had a Democrat-controlled Congress, which makes this 30% success rate somewhat unimpressive.
Got to take another break here at the bottom of the hour.
Sit tight, my good friends.
Back with much more right after this.
So I checked this email during the break, and it's, dear Rush, I'm getting worried.
It sounds like you're getting burned out.
It sounds like you don't care anymore.
That would be horrible, Rush.
Please say it ain't so.
It's not that I, it's in reference to the fact that I'm not interested in watching State of the Union.
Email.
And I'm not.
I'm not.
It's not because I'm burned out on this stuff, folks.
I know what's going to happen.
I do not like watching this guy.
I do not like watching having my intelligence insulted.
I know what's going to happen.
I know the moon's going to be promised.
I know he's going to be applauded from left and right withstanding ovations and all this stuff.
And at the end of the day, None of this may ever become law in the traditional sense, but that's not what, that's no solace for me.
One thing that's true about these, the ratings for State of the Union shows, I talked about this yesterday, they are plummeting.
Now, this is, to me, this is, in the current circumstance, actually a blessing.
It's still a lot of people that watch, but these ratings are way down, particularly compared to when Obama was first emaculated back in 2009 and 2010.
The numbers are way down.
People are just not as fascinated.
They know in advance what's going to be said, those that follow the news and pay attention.
And one of the reasons Obama's been driving all over the country and flying all over the place doing appearance after appearance is because the ratings are down.
And so he's not relying on just one speech on one night to get the propaganda out.
He's going a lot of places in advance, and he'll go a lot of places tomorrow and the rest of this week afterwards and try to get as many media events out of this as possible.
And of course, the thing about it that distresses me is not the nuts and bolts or the guts of it.
This is just, we're going to have a solid hour and 15 minutes tonight of how the Democrat Party is filled with compassion, loves people, only wants the best, and the opposite's going to be thought of and said about the Republicans subtly or directly.
And it's just going to add up to more of a PR mess.
And it's going to have to deal with it in the ensuing days anyway.
And all I'm telling you is there are things I'd rather like justified premieres tonight.
I just got a note from Nick Searcy, who plays Art.
It's one of the marshals, the head marshal on the show.
He says, hey, Rush, you don't have to watch State of the Union.
We got the season finale premiere tonight.
This is the last season premiere, final season premiere.
And that's true.
And so, but there's always TiVo.
Don't fret it, folks.
I'll watch enough of it to be able to show up here and speak of it in an informed way.
But my instincts are just telling me that to do that is to fall into the trap of helping Obama and the Democrats convey what they want conveyed.
And it's all smoke and mirrors.
This is an interesting, this is, I've been holding this story for a couple of days.
It's a Reuters story.
Barack Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy that looks impossible to erase.
The decline of the middle class that he has promised to rescue.
What is this from Reuters?
A little truth here.
Right here, that open is exactly why the State of the Union is being done the way it's being done tonight and why all these talks of tax increases on the rich are taking place.
Obama has fixed it so that the only way the middle class benefits is via the redistribution of wealth, and that means government benefits instead of going out and working and getting jobs.
Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy.
Looks impossible to erase, the decline of the middle class.
In reality, it is impossible to erase.
It is what it is.
But that's what tonight's going to be about, erasing this and making it look like things have never been better.
And frankly, folks, I don't want to be lied to about it.
Things are not looking better than ever.
There's nothing Obama has done that sets this country up for vast growth and improvement.
It's the exact opposite.
The revival of middle-class jobs has been one of Obama's mantras since he took office in 2009, fighting the worst economic crisis in generations.
It was a major theme of his last State of the Union address.
It's expected to feature in the one you scheduled for tonight.
Regime officials said Saturday the president would propose higher capital gains taxes.
Yeah, how's that going to help anybody in the middle class?
New fees on large financial firms.
They're going to help anybody in the middle class.
And other measures to raise $320 billion for programs and tax breaks aimed at the middle class.
Somebody explained to me what program has anybody in the middle class become a member of the upper middle class by utilizing.
This is what insults me.
Government programs do not make a career.
Government programs do not improve your standard of living.
Sitting around and waiting for government to tax people that you think have too much money and getting all happy when you think they're harmed, and then sitting around for whatever Obama decides to redistribute to you, and that's called growing the middle class.
Sorry, it's insulting.
It's not how you grow anything.
It's how you create voters and dependency, and you destroy people's lives, actually, by taking away from them their dignity and their humanity and their self-confidence and everything else.
You create a bunch of people, as many as you can, sitting around waiting for a benefit from government here, a benefit from government there, access to a new program over here.
That doesn't lift the middle class up.
It lifts the Democrat Party up.
It doesn't lift people.
It doesn't lift the middle class at all.
This has never worked.
This is what really grates me.
For thousands of years, as often as it's been tried, socialism is a miserable failure.
And here we're going to sit through an hour and however many minutes listening to yet another presentation on how wonderful it is, how filled with compassion it is, how it's the only thing that's fair and all of that rotgut.
And it's a failure.
It does not work.
It does not improve people's standard of living.
There's no way government taking money out of the private sector can improve standards of living.
The only thing that grows after Obama works this magic is the government.
Look at it.
I just fell into my own trap.
I mentioned private sector after spending a bunch of time yesterday saying we need to broom the term.
It's another thing.
Romney kept running.
Oh, that reminds me.
I meant to make a point yesterday, folks, and I forgot to do it.
We had an audio soundbite of Romney.
This is exactly what's wrong with the Republican Party.
We had a soundbite of Romney yesterday about the possibility he might run for president again.
And Romney was addressing poverty and income inequality.
And he started out by praising Lyndon Johnson and his intentions and his big-heartedness.
Lyndon Johnson, big heart, great intentions, wanted to help people, but sadly, Lyndon Johnson was just wrong.
This from the guy who the Democrats ran around and said he personally let some guy's wife die rather than pay their health care.
Mitt Romney, who was accused of hating the family dog by putting it on the roof of the station wagon during the family vacation.
Mitt Romney, who lied about not paying his taxes.
Thank you, Harry Reid.
Look at all the lies.
Look at all the character assassination these people visited on Mitt Romney during the 2012 presidential campaign.
And here's Mitt Romney yesterday weighing in on the income inequality, praising the good-heartedness, the big-heartedness, and the great intentions of LBJ.
Why in the world, after you have been lied about and destroyed and impugned the way the Democrats did, what is it?
Is it turn the other cheek?
Is it treat them with kindness, kill them with kindness?
Whatever it is, it exemplifies what's wrong with the current crop of Republicans.
They don't have any fight.
There's no fight in them.
What purpose is served by praising LBJ?
There's a movie out now called Film, and even it is unfriendly to LBJ.
See, the Republicans think somehow, this is how convoluted this is.
I guarantee you what the thinking is.
It's either Romney's or some consultant or some advisor.
Well, you know, the voters don't like conflict.
They don't like confrontation.
I like arguing.
Anyone want us to get along?
Praise Johnson or praise Democrats, give him credit for good intentions or whatever.
And it's going to be really hard for people to say you're a mean guy.
No, it's not hard for him to say he's a mean guy.
They've said worse.
They said he's essentially a murderer.
They said that he let some guy's wife die.
They produced a TV commercial.
And all of these TV commercials added up.
Mitt Romney didn't care when some employee's wife died with cancer.
They got the guy and they put him on a TV commercial blaming Romney personally for his wife's death.
And then all this stuff with the family dog and all these other acts of inhumanity engaged in by Bitt Romney.
And the first thing he thinks to do is to praise the architect of the war on poverty and so forth.
Look, yeah, okay, here's the Romney bite from yesterday.
We dug it out of the groove yard of recently forgotten soundbites.
Here it is.
50 years ago, Lyndon Baines Johnson declared the war on poverty.
His heart was in the right place, but his policies didn't work.
We haven't won that war.
That's it.
His heart was in the right place.
No, it wasn't.
His heart was right there where FDRs was, was making the Democrat Party a permanent majority.
That's where Lyndon Johnson's heart was.
War on poverty was socialism.
His heart was in the right place.
You see, we think we're going to win favor with Democrats and moderates by not being confrontational and so forth and so on.
But they can run around and veritably accuse Romney of murder or of manslaughter.
Some employee's wife gets cancer and dies because Romney doesn't care enough to do anything about it.
This stuff has to be fought back on when you're at that level.
But praising LBJ, his heart was in the right place.
Look, I meant to say this yesterday.
It's not tied to anything I'm talking about today.
It's just something I meant to say yesterday.
It just came to me last night and I wanted to make sure that I remembered this as an isolated observation.
Got to take a quick time out back after this.
So bottom line is that they know they're reporting a couple of days ago that Obama is heading into this State of the Union show with a big blemish, and that is the decline of the middle class.
The whole point of this thing is to put a lie to the truth and to talk about the massive expansion of middle class.
Now we're going to do it with, I still, you know, I do get a little mad, probably sound angrier than I really am, but to me, it's just common sense.
Here's the government, and it is what's called the public sector.
Over here is the rest of the economy.
And over here is where the United States is the greatest superpower in the world, not over here in the government, except for the military.
Over here, this is what the private, the free enterprise economy.
Now, for government to get bigger, because it doesn't produce anything, it doesn't make any, for government to get bigger, it has to take away from the free enterprise economy.
Now, you tell me how in the world there can be growth for anybody in the free enterprise economy when the government continues to take things out of it.
Healthcare, one-sixth of it's now gone, just in health care alone.
But every program that raises taxes and takes money out of the pockets of people that work or people that run businesses makes the free enterprise economy shrink.
And as the total economic output of this country becomes dominated more and more, or a percentage of it is taken greater and greater by the government, then the economy cannot possibly be growing.
And people in it cannot experience the kind of wild upswings that we've known in the past.
And so Obama, while daily chipping away at the free enterprise economy and growing the government, is telling everybody that this is how you raise the middle class.
This is how you elevate the middle class by taking money away from them.
Don't kid yourself.
Raising taxes on the rich with the so-called, what about, you know, trickle-down.
You know, the trickle down, it never works.
Raising taxes on the rich and somehow government's going to give that money back to the middle class and everybody.
It's never happened that way.
The whole thing is so bogus.
And everybody should know it by now.
Obama should be a laughingstock proposing this stuff.
I guess that's what really frustrates me, that it still works.
And I know why it works.
It's an emotional pitch.
People have been conditioned to me to be happy when they think people that have more money than they do are suffering or getting targeted and what have you.
It's despicable stuff, these people on the left have done.
In the meantime, I'm going to go to the phones and start with Jim in Brookfield, Illinois.
Hi, Jim.
Thanks for calling, sir.
Great to have you here.
Thank you, Rush.
I appreciate that.
I'm on WLS, home of the Rush Limbaugh Show in Chicago.
And I just wanted to say I noticed a really odd juxtaposition.
You have on one side, you have Obama talking about everyone's getting piece of this and getting a little something.
And just the other day, the Bears hired a new coach, John Fox from Denver.
That's right.
And his verbs were earn, compete, try out.
So in 24 hours, you get a really interesting juxtaposing between Democrat verbs and Republican verbs.
And I'm a teacher.
I teach with the city colleges.
And it's something I had to point out.
Well, we've got to be very careful.
We don't know if John Fox is a Republican or a political.
No, no, no, I'm not speaking for his politics.
I'm not going to be verbiage.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
You just have to be very careful about it.
I don't want to make any assumptions like that.
But I get your point.
I mean, here's the new coach of the Bears, and he's talking about how this team is going to improve.
And everybody in his team is going to have to compete.
And they're only going to take the best.
And it's going to be about showing up on time, and it's going to be working hard, and it's going to be competing against people.
You've got a roster spot on this team.
You're going to be the best we can find for that position.
And over here's Obama promising giveaways and freebies and getting even with the success stories.
If John Fox were to be consistent with Obama, what he would say was, okay, our highest paid player here is our quarterback, Jay Cutler.
Jay Cutler's under contract for $127 million over so many years.
But we've looked at the way Jay Cutler's played, and he's nowhere near worth it.
So, what we're going to do, we're going to take a couple of million from Cutler here and give it to a free agent backup tight end.
And then we're going to take another couple million from Cutler.
We're going to give it to a guy we hope to draft in the first round out of college that we don't even know can play yet.
And we're going to take another couple million from Cutler and we're going to give it to the center who is threatening to bolt for another team because he doesn't like having to have to snap the ball to Cutler whose hands are on his butt every game.
So that's how we're going to make things fair on this team.
We're going to take away from our highest-paid guy and we're going to give it away to other people.
And that's how we're going to get great.
That's what John Fox would have said if he wanted to employ the Obama Democrat Party policy of success back after this.
So the mayor of Paris is going to sue Fox News for impugning the integrity of Paris.
It's about calling these no-go zones for Muslims.
Cops, no-go zones, don't go in there.
It's too dangerous.
Paris mayor thinks their reputation has been damaged.
He's going to sue Fox News.
They announced this to Christiana Monpoor over on CNN.
So we've got that coming up.
▲
Export Selection