All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:36
January 20, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
I have never, and I shouldn't say this.
I have never cared about a State of the Union address less than the one I care about today.
In fact, my temptation is not even to discuss it, because to discuss it is to fall prey to the whole narrative the drive-by media is setting up, which is it's the most important thing in the news today.
And I'm sorry.
I don't believe the they're not State of the Union speeches anymore.
All they are are empty promises.
They're nothing, there's nothing about the State of the Union in this.
There's nothing what it was traditionally meant to be.
And it hasn't been for a while.
I understand that.
It's just uh it's it's a wish l well, it's a it's a vote buying scheme, is what the whole thing is.
And it's an insult to intelligence and and all that.
And you realize that 90% of the stuff that is, well, promised or suggested or offered as a serious intention never happens anyway.
It never comes to pass.
And yet here we are.
The drive-by media is as excited as they've ever been about anything because it's something that's standard operating procedure, president State of the Union show up, make it out to be the biggest thing in the world, and maybe at one time it was.
And I will maybe I'm getting cynical.
I don't know.
That doesn't mean, folks, I'm not gonna watch it.
I'm gonna watch it because it's my job.
I'm just telling you, I'm I'm as who wants to sit there and look at TV for an hour or fifty minutes and be lied to.
Who wants to sit and look at TV for an hour and fifteen minutes and do nothing but get frustrated?
Have to take notes, mental or otherwise.
But the the main thing is falling prey to what I have often referred to here as the daily soap opera script.
You know, get looped into it and uh participating in it, even though it's I don't know.
It's not even it's not that it isn't real.
It's that it is.
You know, it's the establishment.
Pomp and circumstance and doing what the establishment does, and it's basically a night where we're all told how wonderful government is, how great government is, how much bigger and greater government is, how much more compassionate government can be, how much more compassionate and giving government's gonna be.
And none of it ever matters.
Positively, or very little of it does.
And then we got we're gonna have the guests up there, guests of Muchell Obama sitting up in the gallery and have a dreamer.
We're gonna have a couple illegal immigrants, gonna have some people that escape Cuba.
We're gonna I don't know, folks.
It's uh it probably doesn't help that it's this regime in charge of it.
Anyway, despite all of that, it's great to have you here.
It always is, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, the telephone number if you want to be on the program, 800-282-288-2.
Email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
You know, we've been talking about film uh quite a bit lately.
And amazingly, audio sound bites, the first what four.
It's like uh yeah, first four sound bites are all about what happened on CBS this morning or extra last night about Oprah going to Selma.
Uh and and how Dr. King looking down from above would uh judge it, what he would think of it.
And it's all made me think, you know, yesterday I said that there aren't enough people actually pronouncing the name Selma with enough soul.
Uh you have to say it with a lot of soul, a lot of sympathy, a lot of sadness.
Silm.
In the middle, you could be talking as normally as any when the word Selma comes up, you could be talking just like this, and you have to say the word and it comes film.
That's how the Reverend Sharpton says it in John Lewis and all that.
I've got a different idea for Oprah.
She needs to say it entirely different way.
And when I thought about it, probably make more sense for Oprah to pronounce it sell more.
As in we gotta sell more tickets.
Because Sim is still the worst box office performer of all the best picture nominees, despite it having been Martin Luther King Jr. weekend.
I mean, it's it's not in and on CBS this morning, they all gang up on Harvey Weinstein as the most powerful man in Hollywood for influencing Oscar votes and not caring enough to get behind the movie.
It's not, it's the old adds up, it's not a great day for the left.
I mean, they really thought this was going to smoke everything.
And you add to that the fact that American sniper is cleaning up and they are livid.
You see, they think in a straight heads-up comparison, Cell should be obliterating American sniper.
And of course, it's the other way around.
I've even got a story in the stack here.
Get this.
You know why American Sniper is doing well?
You know why?
Because there's a legion of conservatives who have finally decided to leave home and go to the movies.
That's why.
Yes, conservatives are making American sniper was it is, as though that de-legitimizes it.
Or delegitimizes it.
Yeah, if it weren't for conservatives seeing a political message and something patriotic and a flagish about it, why it wouldn't be doing anywhere near as well as it's doing.
It's almost as though conservatives are not really a natural part of the uh American political scene just like man to the global warming people is not really a part of nature.
It's it's fascinating to watch these people on the left try to explain away the success of American sniper while they snipe at at the same time.
Hey, quick little pop quiz.
Who said this?
For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
Who said that?
I'll give you a hint.
It was said in 2010.
I'll give you a second hint.
It was said from the Oval Office.
If you guessed Obama, you're right.
On June 15th, and I'm just offering this as an opportunity, I want you to keep this in mind as you listen to the State of the Union show tonight.
On June 15th, 2010, the president, Barack Hussein O addressed the nation about the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
And the president was wrong.
The president was phenomenally wrong.
He said for decades we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.
Time and again the path forward has been blocked, not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.
The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight.
Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America.
Each day we send nearly one billion dollars of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil.
And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.
We cannot consign our children to this future.
For decades we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
He was dead wrong.
He is so wrong.
Have you seen the numbers on the economy, the approval numbers on the economy?
People are way up.
They think the economy's going great, and this is the reason why.
Gasoline prices are down.
By the way, there's a dirty little secret about why gasoline prices are down, too.
And I don't see a whole lot of people uh figuring it out.
No.
Well, it's partially the Saudis, but that's that's that's uh not the primary reason that the price of oil is plummeting, and the primary reason the price of gasoline is plummeting.
But My point here is that Obama, and he wasn't alone, was dead wrong.
By the way, that BP oil spill, what was it?
Just a couple of weeks later they couldn't find the oil?
All that oil it's I couldn't find it.
Remember that?
Remember the controversy?
It couldn't figure out where it went.
So we got all these Kakamimi stories.
Well, you know, it sank.
Or did something, but it's out there, it's polluting.
No, it's just that it was uh eaten.
It was eaten by seawater.
Powerful stuff, seawater.
But anyway, the president said for decades we've known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.
And look at us now.
The price of gasoline, average across the country, two dollars and fourteen cents.
That means in some places across the country it's under two bucks.
And right on schedule, what are governments doing?
Belly aching.
Yep, tax revenue plummeting.
Uh-oh, need some emergency action.
Raise taxes on gasoline.
Because in some places it isn't on the federal tax is static.
It's 18 cents no matter what.
But states sometimes the tax rate floats.
And revenue may not be the same when the gas price plummet plummets like it's doing.
Now the real reason that, and this is the unspoken reason, and it's not the sole reason, but one of the leading or primary reasons why the price of oil is down and gasoline is demand.
Demand is down.
And the demand is down because the U.S. economy's in the tank.
Ninety-two point eight million Americans not working, fewer and fewer people traveling.
You won't find very many experts acknowledge this because it it uh contradicts the idea that the economy is roaring back.
It's not just the Saudis artificially lowering the price, trying to damage fracking and all that.
I mean, they can do only so much.
But the power of the U.S. economy can either add to that or overcome that, depending on how many other oil producing outfits participate with the Saudis.
But it's the the demand being down is a massive factor here that nobody's talking about.
And the fascinating thing or interesting thing about that is the demand is down because the U.S. economy is not chugging along.
The U.S. economy is not going gangbusters.
Contrary to what the Washington establishment and drive-by media and everybody else would uh would have you believe.
Let me take a quick time out.
We'll come back, review some past State of the Union stuff just to show you what I mean about how so little of what is proposed in States of the Union actually ever comes to pass.
Don't go away.
America's real anchor man, the doctor of democracy, America's truth detector, all combined here, one harmless, lovable little fuzzball bundle.
Ill papa.
The Pope all over the news again today.
He was in the news yesterday, the uh one of the days last week didn't get to, been saving it all up today is the day we dissect it all.
From the Washington Times, the headline, Obama has worst State of the Union records since Gerald Ford.
Judging by his recent history, it doesn't really matter what Obama says in tonight's State of the Union show.
Congress is going to ignore him anyway.
Mr. Obama has the second worst record of getting his State of the Union policy requests enacted into law of any president in the last 50 years.
This, according to an analysis by a couple of scholars, have puts uh Obama only above the unelected two-year presidency of Gerald Ford.
Now you might look at this as good news.
I'm not sure the country could have survived with Obama getting much more of what he proposed in these speeches, because he's proposed the sink and uh and everything else.
But see, we're not out of the woods yet, because these last two years, I don't think we've I don't think we've begun to see even half of what's headed our way in these last two years.
And I know I've said this over and over again, so I'm not gonna beat the dead horse.
But the Republicans have made it clear they're not going to take any steps to stop him.
And he's got two years to complete this fundamental transformation.
And it's clear the Constitution is an impediment or an obstacle that he doesn't think is a serious one now.
He's not going to have much trouble going past it.
So this State of the Union address, it isn't going to matter whether Congress authorizes some of this stuff or not.
What's to stop him from doing it?
You might say, well, he just can't go out and raise taxes, willy-nilly.
I mean, you've got to have Congress do that via legislation.
Don't reject this just out of hand.
I mean, there's so many things going on now that people said were not possible because of the Constitution.
There's so many violations of the Constitution taking place now, and it's become something that happens with such regularity that people have stopped noticing.
And have just begun to accept it.
Even on our side, they say, well, that's just what Obama's doing.
And as usual, we have to wait till he's gone to address any of this.
We have to wait till he's served out his term, and then the whoever's next elected elected will begin the process of reversing some of this stuff.
But that isn't going to be easy either, because Obama's not just going to leave town and let everything he's done transform the country be unraveled.
That's one of the reasons why he's going to maintain a host maintain a home in Washington.
But all that's for down the road.
It's it's a fact that he has promised time and again to do a whole bunch of things, and very little of it has actually happened.
But now, in these last two years, where he's not concerned whether Congress goes along and passes anything.
We'll just have to keep a sharp eye.
Now, what will, you know what, presidents when they go to the State of the Union show, they try to list and rattle off their accomplishments from uh say over the last year or during their presidential terms.
So what'll Obama point to as his accomplishments since the last State of the Union show?
Is he going to brag about the rise of ISIS?
Is he going to brag about how we've uh we've lost Iraq and we're on the brink of losing Afghanistan?
You see that ISIS killed thirteen young boys because they watched a soccer game?
Yeah, so is Obama gonna talk about uh how he has stopped the rise of ISIS?
Is he gonna brag about how we've lost Iraq?
He's gonna brag about we're on the brink of losing Afghanistan.
Is he gonna brag about freeing dozens of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay?
Is he going to brag about trading five of the worst of them for a man who may have deserted his post?
That would be Bergdoll.
Is Obama gonna brag about swapping five Cuban terrorists, a couple of whom were actually convicted of murder for some American hostages the Castros were holding for bargaining chips?
I mean, yeah, he's got a lot to brag about here, doesn't he?
Is he gonna brag about 92.8 million Americans not working?
Is he gonna brag about the absolute mess that healthcare.gov has been from the get-go?
Is he going to brag about all the states that he has sued who have attempted to pass legislation in those states to enforce already existing immigration laws?
Is he gonna brag about how he has stopped deporting almost anyone except the most hardened criminals?
Is he gonna brag about getting to the bottom of the IRS targeting of the Tea Party?
Is he gonna brag about getting to the bottom of what happened at Benghazi?
Is he gonna brag about finally finding out what happened at the VA scandals and straightening that out?
Or is he gonna skip listing all of these accomplishments?
And just move on to listing even more ways he wants to buy votes for Democrats in the future.
Again, study out today by A couple of scholars reports that Obama actually has the second worst State of the Union success rate for any president over the last fifty years.
And that would be Gerald Ford, who wasn't even elected.
Look at what Gerald Ford faced.
Earl Ford faced a country in a media still wallowing in Watergate.
Ford's success rate was 28%.
Obama's is 30.
30% of what Obama has proposed is actually happened.
And it's going to be probably more of the same tonight.
And don't forget that for two years of his tenure, Obama even had a Democrat-controlled Congress, which makes this 30% success rate somewhat unimpressive.
Got to take another break here at the bottom of the hour.
Sit tight, my good friends, back with much more right after this.
So I checked this email during the break, and it's uh dear Rush.
I'm getting worried.
It sounds like you're getting burned out.
It sounds like you don't care anymore.
That would be horrible, Rush.
Please say it ain't so.
It's not that I'm it's in reference to the fact that I'm not interested in watching State of the Union.
Email.
And I open the I'm and I'm not.
I'm not.
It's not because I'm burned out on this stuff, folks.
I know what's gonna happen.
I do not like watching this guy.
I do not like watching having my intelligence insulted.
I I just it I know what's gonna happen.
I know the moon's gonna be promised.
I know he's gonna be applauded from left and right with standing ovations and all this stuff, and at the end of the day, uh it it none of this may ever become law in the traditional sense, but that's not what that's no solos for me.
One thing that's true about these, the ratings for State of the Union shows, I talked about this yesterday, they are plummeting.
Now, this is a to me, this is uh in the current circumstance actually a blessing.
It's still a lot of people that watch, but these ratings are way down, particularly compared to when Obama was first immaculated back in 2009 and 2010.
The numbers are way down.
People are just not as fascinated.
They know in advance what's going to be said, those that follow the news and pay attention.
And one of the reasons Obama's been driving all over the country and flying all over the place doing appearance after a appearance is because the ratings are down.
And so he's not relying on just one speech on one night to uh get the propaganda out.
He's going a lot of places in advance, and he'll go a lot of places uh tomorrow and the rest of this week afterwards and try to get as many media events out of this as possible.
And of course, the thing about it that distresses me is not the nuts and bolts of the guts of it.
Uh this is this is just we're gonna have a solid hour and 15 minutes tonight of how the Democrat Party is filled with compassion, loves people, only wants the best, and the opposite's gonna be thought of and said about the Republicans subtly or directly.
And it's just gonna add up to more of a PR mess.
And it's it's gonna have to deal with it in the ensuing days anyway.
And all I'm telling you is there are things I'd rather like justified premieres tonight.
I just got a note from Nick Cersei, who plays uh who plays art, is one of the marshals, the head marshal on the show.
He says, hey Rush, you don't have to watch State of the Union.
We got the season finale premiere tonight.
This is the last season premiere.
Final season premiere.
And that's true.
And so, but there's always TiVo.
Don't fret it, folks.
I'll watch enough of it to be able to show up here and speak of it in an informed way.
But my instincts are just are telling me that to do that is to fall into the trap of helping Obama and the Democrats convey what they want conveyed.
And it's it's all smoke and mirrors.
This is an interesting.
This is uh uh I've been holding this story for a couple of days.
It's a Reuters story.
Barack Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy that looks impossible to erase.
The decline of the middle class that he has promised to rescue.
What is this?
From Reuters, a little truth here.
Right here, that open is exactly why the State of the Union is being done the way it's being done tonight, and why all these talks of tax increases on the rich are taking place.
Obama has has fixed it so that the only way the middle class benefits is via the redistribution of wealth, and that means government benefits.
Instead of going out and working and getting jobs.
Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy, looks impossible to erase the decline of the middle class.
In reality, it is impossible to erase.
It is what it is.
But that's what tonight's going to be about erasing this and making it look like things have never been better.
And frankly, folks, I don't want to be lied to about it.
Things are not looking better than ever.
There's nothing Obama has done that sets this country up for vast growth and improvement.
It's the exact opposite.
The revival of middle class jobs has been one of Obama's mantras since he took office in 2009, fighting the worst economic crisis in generations.
It was a major theme of his last State of the Union address.
It's expected to feature in the one schedule for tonight.
Regime officials said Saturday the president would propose higher capital gains taxes.
Yeah, how's that going to help anybody in the middle class?
New fees on large financial firms, they're gonna help anybody the middle class.
And other measures to raise $320 billion for programs and tax breaks aimed at the middle class.
Somebody explained to me what program has anybody in the middle class become a member of the upper middle class by utilizing.
This is what insults me.
Government programs do not make a career.
Government programs do not improve your standard of living.
Sitting around and waiting for government to tax people that you think have too much money and getting all happy when you think they're harmed, and then sitting around for whatever Obama decides to redistribute to you, and that's called growing the middle class.
Sorry, it's insulting.
It's not how you grow anything.
It's how you create voters and dependency and you destroy people's lives, actually, by taking away from them their dignity and their humanity and their self-confidence and everything else.
You create a bunch of people, as many as you can, sitting around waiting for a benefit from government here, a benefit from government there, access to a new program over here.
That doesn't lift the middle class up.
It lifts the Democrat Party up.
It doesn't lift people, it doesn't lift the middle class at all.
This has never worked.
This is what really grates me.
For thousands of years, as often as it's been tried, socialism is a miserable failure, and here we're gonna sit through an hour and however many minutes listening to yet another presentation on how wonderful it is, how filled with compassion it is, how it's the only thing that's fair, and all of that rot gut, and it's a failure.
It does not work.
It does not improve people's standard of living.
There's no way government taking money out of the private sector can improve standards of living.
The only thing that grows after Obama works this magic is the government.
Look at I just fell into my own trap.
I mentioned private sector after spending a bunch of time yesterday saying we need to broom the term.
It's another thing.
Romney kept running.
Oh, that reminds me, I meant to make a point yesterday, folks, and I forgot to do it.
We had an audio soundbite of Romney.
This is exactly what's wrong with the Republican Party.
We had a soundbite of Romney yesterday about the um uh possibility he might run for president again.
And Romney was addressing poverty and income inequality.
And he started out by praising Lyndon Johnson and his intentions and his big heartedness.
Lyndon Johnson, big heart, great intentions, wanted to help people, but sadly Lyndon Johnson was just wrong.
This from the guy who the Democrats ran around and said he personally let some guy's wife die rather than pay their health care.
Mitt Romney, who was accused of hating the family dog by putting it on the roof of the station wagon during the family vacation.
Mitt Romney, who lied about not paying his taxes.
Thank you, Harry Reed.
Look at all the lies.
Look at all the character assassination these people visited on Mitt Romney during the 2012 presidential campaign.
And here's Mitt Romney yesterday, weighing in on the income inequality, praising the good heartedness, the big heartedness, and the great intentions of LBJ.
Why in the world, after you have been lied about and destroyed and impugned the way the Democrats did, what is it?
Is it turn the other cheek?
Is it treat them with kindness, kill them with kindness, whatever it is, it exemplifies what's wrong with the current crop of Republicans.
They don't have any fight.
There's no fight in them.
What purpose does what what what purpose is served by praising LBJ?
There's a movie out now called film, and even it is unfriendly to LBJ.
See, the Republicans think somehow, this is how convoluted this is.
I guarantee you what the thinking is.
It's either Romney's or some consultant or some advisor.
Well, you know, the uh voters don't like conflict.
They don't like confrontation like arguing, and they want us to get along.
Praise, praise uh praise Johnson or praise Democrats for him, give him credit for good intentions or whatever, and it's going to be really hard for people to say you're a mean guy.
No, it's not hard for them to say he's a mean guy.
They've said worse.
They said he's essentially a murderer.
They said that he let some guy's wife die.
They produced a TV commercial.
And all of these TV commercials added up.
Mitt Romney didn't care when some employee's wife died with cancer.
And they got the guy and they put him on a TV commercial blaming Romney personally for his wife's death.
And then all this stuff with the family dog and all these other acts of inhumanity engaged in my bit Romney.
And the first thing he thinks to do is to praise the architect of the war on poverty and so forth.
Look.
Yeah, okay, here's here's the Romney bite from yesterday.
We dag uh dug it out of the uh the grooveyard of uh recently forgotten sound bites.
Here it is.
Fifty years ago, Lyndon Baines Johnson declared the war on poverty.
His heart was in the right place.
But his policies didn't work.
We haven't won that war.
So then that's it.
His heart was in the right.
No, it wasn't.
His heart was right there where FDR's was, was making the Democrat Party a permanent majority.
That's where Lyndon Johnson's heart was.
War on poverty was socialism.
His heart was in the right place.
You see, we think we're gonna win favor with Democrats and moderates by not being confrontational and so forth and so on.
But they can run around and veritably accuse Romney of murder or of manslaughter, some employee's wife gets cancer and dies because Romney doesn't care enough to do anything about it.
Uh it's you know, this stuff has to be fought back on when you're at that level, but praising LBJ's heart was in the right place.
But it's just that look it, I meant to say this yesterday.
It's not tied to anything I'm talking about today.
It's just something I meant to say yesterday.
It just came to me last night, and I wanted to make sure I remembered this as an isolated observation.
Gotta take a quick time out back after this.
So, bottom line is that they know they're reporting a couple of days ago that Obama's heading into this uh State of the Union show with a big blemish, and that is the decline of the middle class.
The whole point of this thing is to put a lie to the truth and to talk about the massive expansion of middle class.
Now we're gonna do it with I still, you know, I do get a little mad, probably sound angrier than I really am, but to me it's just common sense.
Here's the government, and it is what's called the public sector.
Over here is the rest of the economy.
And over here is where the United States is the greatest superpower in the world, not over here in the government, except for the military.
Over here, this is what the private, the free enterprise economy.
Now for government to get bigger, because it doesn't produce anything, it doesn't make it for government to get bigger, it has to take away from the free enterprise economy.
Now you tell me how in the world there can be growth for anybody in the free enterprise economy when the government continues to take things out of it.
Health care, one sixth of it's now gone, just in health care alone.
But every program that raises taxes and takes money out of the pockets of people that work or people that run businesses makes the free enterprise economy shrink.
And as the total economic output of this country becomes dominated more and more, or a percentage of it is taken greater and greater by the government, then the economy cannot possibly be growing.
And people in it cannot experience the kind of wild upswings that we've known in the past.
And so Obama, while daily chipping away at the free enterprise economy and growing the government, is telling everybody that this is how you raise the middle class.
This is how you elevate the middle class by taking money away from them.
Don't kid yourself.
Raising taxes on the rich with the so-called what about you talk about trickle down.
You know, but the trickle down that never works.
Raising taxes on the rich, and somehow government's going to give that money back to the middle class, and everybody how it's never happened that way.
The whole thing is so bogus.
And it should everybody should know it by now.
Obama should be a laughing stock proposing this stuff.
I guess that's what really frustrates me.
That it still works.
And I know why it works.
It's an emotional pitch.
People have been conditioned to me to be happy when they think people have more money than they do are suffering or are getting being targeted and what have you.
It's despicable stuff, these people on the left have none.
In the meantime, let me go to the phones and start with Jim in Brookfield, Illinois.
Hi, Jim.
Thanks for calling, sir.
Great to have you here.
Thank you, Rush.
I appreciate that.
I'm on WLS, home of the uh Rush Limbaugh Show in Chicago.
And I just wanted to say I noticed a really uh odd juxtaposition.
Uh you have uh on one side you have Obama talking about everyone's getting piece of this and getting uh a little something.
And uh just the other day the uh Bears hired a new coach, John Fox from Denver.
That's right.
And his verbs were uh earn, uh compete, try out.
Uh so in you know in 24 hours you get a really interesting juxtaposing between uh Democrat verbs and Republican verbs.
And I'm a teacher.
I I teach with the city colleges, and uh it's something I I hadn't uh point out.
And uh Well, the only we got to be very careful.
We don't know if John Fox is a Republican or something.
Oh no, I'm not speaking for his politics.
It does have to be verbiage.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Just have to be very careful about that.
I don't want to make any assumptions like that.
Um but I get your point.
I mean, here's a new coach of the Bears, and he's talking about how this team is going to improve.
And everybody in his team's gonna have to compete, and they're only gonna take the best.
And it's gonna be about showing up on time and it's gonna be working hard and it's gonna be competing against people, you got a roster spot on this team, you're gonna be the best we can find for that position.
And over here's Obama.
Promising giveaways and freebies and getting even with the success stories.
If John Fox were to be consistent with Obama, what he would say was, okay, our highest paid player here's our quarterback, Jay Cutler.
Jay Cutler's under contract for 127 million dollars over so many years.
But we've looked at the way Jay Cutler's played, and he's nowhere near worth it.
So what we're gonna do, we're gonna take a couple of million from Cutler here and give it to a free agent back up tight end.
And then we're gonna take another couple million from Cutler, we're gonna give it to a guy we hope to draft in the first round out of college, and we don't even know can play yet.
And we're gonna take another couple million from Cutler, and we're gonna give it to the center who is threatening to bolt for another team because he doesn't like having to have to snap the ball to Cutler whose hands are on his butt every game.
So that's how we're gonna make things fair on this team.
We're gonna take away from our highest paid guy, and we're gonna give it away to other people, and that's how we're gonna get great.
That's what John Fox would have said if he wanted to employ the Obama Democrat Party policy of success back after this.
So the mayor of Paris is going to sue Fox News for impugning the integrity of Paris.
It's about it's about calling these no-go zones uh for Muslims.
Cops, no-go zones.
Don't go in there, it's too dangerous.
Uh Paris mayor thinks their uh reputation has been damaged, you can sue Fox News.
They announced this to Christianement poor over on uh on CNN.
So we've got that coming up.
▲
Export Selection