All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
January 12, 2015, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Okay, come on in.
Come on in.
I'm not going to start the program and have it be interrupted.
Come on in.
Come on in.
Normally what happens, I start the program and then I, they're going to have to interrupt.
They haven't got all the candles lighted yet.
Oh, okay.
It's my birthday today.
Doesn't matter, folks, no matter how many times I've asked the staff to ignore it and not make a big deal out of it, they ignore me and they continue to come in and make a big deal.
So I finally resigned myself to the fact that they're going to make a big deal out of it.
So they say, come on in, let's get it started here before the program begins so we don't have to interrupt it.
And here they come.
All right, fine.
Yes, sir.
Happy birthday to me.
Happy birthday.
Happy birthday to me.
There's the cake.
Happy birthday.
Well, you said there was a lot of candles on this cake.
What in the world is that?
It's a flower cake from 1-800 Flowers.
That's a flower cake?
Yes.
Isn't that awesome?
Holy cow.
How about that?
Okay, light the flower cake.
All right, now, see, you didn't select any numbers of candles here that make any sense.
This is a six and a four there.
Right, right.
So I'll just blow them out and huff and puff.
Dumb.
Do you have any new fantasies for you at 16?
No, don't.
I got in big trouble for that.
Now you did it.
Now somebody have to explain it again.
You know, thank you very much.
Is this my favorite cake?
Or did you get some kind of pineapple upside down thing for you?
No, it's white trash.
All right.
All right.
My favorite cake.
Favorite.
Thank you very much, guys.
I really appreciate it.
Very, very much.
And here we are, folks, kicking off a brand new week of broadcast excellence.
Rushland behind the golden EIB microphone.
Great to have you here.
The telephone number is 800-282-288.
Yes, I'm going to explain it again, but I'm going to get in trouble all over again.
But I'll do it.
800-282-2882 and the email address, lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
As I have said, throughout my life, I've always wanted to be older than what I was.
Whenever I was whatever, I wanted to be older.
And particularly when I was a teenager.
I wanted to be in my 20s when I was a teenager.
I wanted to be through with all of that.
I didn't enjoy teenage years.
I don't believe most people do.
I think they're lying to you when they tell you how much they love school and all that.
But maybe they did.
Anyway, I just wanted to be through with that and out of it.
Then when I hit my 20s, I wanted to be 40.
I wanted to have all that.
I wanted to get where I knew I was going.
None of this, the journey is the journey for me.
I wanted to get where I'm pretty confident I knew I was going.
And I've been right.
Every year has been better than the previous.
I have always been validated in this belief that getting older would be increased happiness and contentment and any number of things.
And on balance, on balance, that has been the case.
And even now, I mean, today I turned 64.
And am I actively looking?
I mean, is my life going to appreciably change between now and the time I'm 70?
Not nearly as dramatically as it was going to change between the time I was 15 and 30 or between 30 and 40.
But I still haven't, I haven't reached the point where I regret the years piling up.
Honestly, a lot of people, it happens to them earlier in their life, and that's unfortunate.
I have not gotten to that point.
There are some things that I'm beginning to be worried about, regret.
I mean, I'm a big technology lover, and I do have this wish that I'd have been born sooner to the emergence of this current out because it's going to be so cool.
The technological, I'm going to try to cram as much of that as I can whenever I can because it just fascinates me.
But then, and I happened to mention this when I, the first day back from vacation, I said, but the only negative connotation to getting older, I said, it finally hit me.
And that is, and I don't know what prompted this.
I mean, it just came out of nowhere.
And Snerdley just seemed to love this.
And I kind of was just offering it as a throwaway.
But the thing about getting older is that I realize there's less and less likelihood that my fantasies ever have any chance of happening.
Now, Snerdley, when you hear the word fantasy, and given Snerdley's noted interests, he thought the connotation meant sexual.
And we have all kinds of fantasies out there, but well, man, that's the first time you've ever talked about those.
I said, I'm not talking about those.
And then to crack Snerdley up further, I said, besides, now, even if the fantasies were to happen, the people I always dreamed about are no longer attractive, so it isn't going to be any big deal.
So I'm pretty much going to give up on the Snerdley just lost it at that point.
It asked me to repeat this to you.
And I got in trouble last time I did it through all this.
So there you have it.
Now, what else about I oh, I need to thank, I mean, I'm getting so many, well, emails and texts and things from people wishing me happy birthday.
And I want to offer a blanket thank you to people.
I mean, there's no way I can respond to all of them.
I mean, people I know, people at the writing at Rush 24-7, the comment line at Rush Revere page, it's overwhelming.
It's more than I can personally respond to.
So thank you to everybody.
Well, but I've always said about birthdays that unless you live in a war zone or a poverty-stricken country, what's the big deal about living or surviving another year?
You know, what's, I mean, what's the point?
Okay, so you're older.
Well, but it marks the day that you entered the world and it was never to see it.
But that's true for everybody.
It isn't that unique a thing, a birthday.
But I finally have learned.
I've always had trouble accepting gratitude, accolades, praise, groupy type behavior aimed at me, and now I'm open to all of it.
What were you going to say?
I'm not a celebrity.
You know what he just said?
You know what he just snerdly just said, one thing that's different about you is you don't dye your hair.
You don't wear a toupee.
You don't do anything to older.
You seem to be very comfortable with who you are.
You're unlike all these other celebrities who are out making all these surface changes to themselves, which does nothing more than tell you they don't like themselves.
I've always believed that.
No, that's only because I'm lazy.
I don't want to have to go to where you have to go to do some stuff to your hair.
I'd just as soon go smoke a cigar and watch TV.
I'm not, I am not vain.
Anybody that looks at me can tell you that.
I have absolutely no vanity.
I've always, you are who you are.
What's wrong with being who you are?
I've never wanted to be a mystery.
I really haven't.
That's what puzzles me about the left not getting me.
Anyway, that's off the beaten path.
One of the things left over from Friday, I haven't forgotten these amazing, let me just put it this way: how many of you have been hearing all of your life that the divorce rate in America is 50%?
And how many of you have maybe decided never to get married?
Because, hell, you're just going to end up being in divorce is 50%.
What if I were to tell you the divorce rate is not 50% and is nowhere near 50%?
You might not believe it.
I've got the numbers.
I've got the stats.
I had it on Friday, but time ran out.
Not enough time remained in the Friday excursion into broadcast excellence to delve into it with the detail that needs to be.
So we have that.
I still have a lot of stuff from one week ago today in that stack that I haven't gotten to that is evergreen.
It's kind of timeless.
It'll work any day.
This is kind of a slow day.
The NFL yesterday is very clear the NFL did not want to reward spouse abuse, so the Ravens had no prayer against the Patriots.
Well, I'm just trying to get in on a conspiracy angle of things.
It's amazing how many people now think that these games are fixed.
All because of that game between the Cowboys and the Lions.
And the conspiracy theory on yesterday, Des Bryant not being allowed that catch.
Well, the league knew they had a problem.
They had to rule against the Cowboys for credibility.
They had to rule against them.
So when a play like that came up, you knew the league was going to go against the Cowboys.
Just take battle and do battle with a conspiracy crowd.
It's just, it's amazing.
I've always been fascinated by the way people think.
One thing about Peyton Manning, we just discovered that he's been playing the last two months with the actual torn right quadricep muscle.
Not a sprain, not a brute, but a torn.
That's the big muscle in the thigh for those of you in Rio Linda.
He's been reporting he has no feeling in his toes.
And you should see the stories to Peyton Manning.
Is it over?
Was that the Swan song?
Is this the last time we've ever seen Peyton?
Oh my God.
People are writing.
Look how fast Peyton Manning's skills dwindled away.
Why, it was right in the middle of this season, two months remaining in the season, and we actually watched Peyton Manning become too old.
Now it has just been announced that the thigh injury he had was not some bruise, but is actually a major, that's a tear, and he played with it.
And that could have had, did have, no question, an impact on his abilities to throw the ball accurately, any number of things.
There was a big We Are the World thing in Paris yesterday.
What, what, 40, 40 nations were represented, or 44 people from different nations are represented in a kind of a solidarity movement, solidarity show with the people in France.
In two separate instances Sunday morning, Attorney General Eric Holder refused to follow the lead of France and declare that the U.S. is at war with radical Islam in the aftermath of the brutal attack on the magazine offices last Wednesday.
Isn't and by the way, Obama didn't go, and even the drive-bys are wondering, why didn't Obama go?
Are you kidding?
Do you not really know why Obama wouldn't attend this?
Grab audio soundbite number seven.
Media montage Of the drive-by media shocked that Obama did not attend the French unity march.
Leaders of many countries linking arms, joining millions in a stunning show of unity in Paris.
One Western leader, though, was conspicuously absent, President Obama.
Heavy criticism of President Obama for skipping Sunday's rally in Paris.
No senior U.S. figures were there.
The Unity March Sunday, 40 world leaders, including all of Europe, even Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, along with his adversary, Palestinian President Abbas, but not President Obama.
President Obama choosing not to be in Paris for the Unity March.
The president not showing up for that unity march.
President Obama nor any top U.S. official attended the event.
The absence of any U.S. leader now has the White House on the defensive.
No, they're not on the defensive.
I don't think you, the White House is never on the defensive.
You know, as close as most members of the media are to Obama, you would think that by now, with six years under their belt and with a fairly decent amount of proximity, that they would finally understand who they're dealing with.
This White House is never on defensive because the president, it's not in his physical makeup to have self-doubt, or his psychological makeup, the narcissism that he has, and the spoiled nature of his childhood.
It's impossible for him to have doubts.
It's psychologically impossible.
I mean, you have to have a conscience and any number of things in order to have self-doubt or to be put on the defensive.
And that just isn't the case.
That doesn't aptly describe.
You know, why wouldn't Obama go to this thing?
See, this is where the drive-bys get all convoluted.
They think that everything is style over substance, symbolism over substance.
And when you've got a chance to engage in symbolism over sub, you take it.
And they've seen Obama engage in a whole bunch of these kinds of things, symbolism over substance public appearances.
They've seen Obama engage in a lot of things that have no substance to them but a great image or photo op or what have you.
But why is Obama?
He's not going to go be part of the crowd.
40 some-odd people and Obama is going to be part.
There's no way.
He's not going to subject himself.
He's not going to put himself in a group where he is seen as one of many, many equals.
That's the way this thing is looked at.
And that's just one.
There are many ways.
The other thing is, what was being condemned here?
Militant Islam was on the plate here for being condemned.
Now, let's face it, this is the president of the United Nations said that we must never allow the word of the prophet to be smeared.
I'm paraphrasing.
This is the president who wrote that one of the most beautiful sounds he's ever heard is the morning call to prayer at a mosque in a city where Islam is being practiced.
The White House saying, nah, Obama couldn't go because this wasn't about Obama.
And that's exactly right, by the way.
They may be trying to compliment or stave things up.
That's exactly it wasn't about Obama, so why should he be there?
He's not going to go up and be about, you know, one of 40 people doing the same thing.
Now, admitting that something isn't about Obama, that may be a first for the White House.
But Obama didn't say it.
But it isn't about him.
So he's not going to show.
Holder was in Paris, but he didn't go either.
And this is the guy.
This is the guy who called all of us that we were a nation of cowards for refusing to have an honest discussion on race.
Well, here's an honest discussion on Muslim extremism, and Holder bugs out too.
He don't want to be any part of it.
So he's acting all filled with cowardice as well about this.
It's funny.
I can remember that Beatles song, When I'm 64, I used to think it was about old people.
And now here I am 64.
And it is, it is interesting.
And I have gone through this with you all a couple of times before.
And I want to, again, just to explore it.
I'm 64.
There's no way I am the way my dad was when he was 64.
And I'm no way the way my grandfather was when he was 64.
I don't any more feel 64 years old than I feel 75 or 80 years old.
And I've often wondered why.
I'm curious.
I have never-ending curiosity.
Why did my dad and grandfather, when they were 64, 65, why did they look it?
Why did they act it?
This is not in any way criticism of them.
It's not critical at all.
It's more a question of how the generations differ and why.
And if you're a regular listener, you've heard some of my theories on this.
I'll repeat them again for those of you who weren't here during previous broadcasts.
We've delved into this.
But let me get back to Eric Holder for just a second because in two separate instances, yesterday morning, the Attorney General, who was in Paris, refused to follow the lead of France and declare the U.S. is at war with radical Islam.
We have a soundbite of Holder on ABC with George Stephanopoulos this week.
Stephanopoulos said, the French prime minister said yesterday, France is at war with radical Islam.
Is the U.S. at war with radical Islam?
Well, I certainly think that we are at war with those who would commit terrorist attacks and who would corrupt the Islamic faith in the way that they do to try to justify their terrorist actions.
So that's who we are at war with.
And we are determined to take the fight to them, to prevent them from engaging in these kinds of activities.
Now, that's not a full-fledged endorsement of what the French prime minister said.
But you could look at this as a tiny little break with the policy of the regime and associate Islam with terrorism.
Holder did do that, but he was reluctant to do it.
And it may even be that he accidentally did it and didn't intend to.
It was Obama who said at the UN, the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet.
Makes no, I mean, total sense he wouldn't show up at this end.
Okay, back to the phones, not back.
We're going to start with the phones.
You're going to start my hometown.
Cape Girardo, Missouri.
This is Jim.
And welcome, sir, to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Well, it's an honor to talk to you, Rush.
Happy birthday.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that, sir.
Yes.
Okay, I wanted to comment the other day on this, the murders over there at Charlie Ebo in France, and that one fellow that said he got the idea from all the publicity about Abigail.
And Everybody in the news media is trying to blame this on Bush, but I believe they should be taking a lion's share of the blame for this, because had they not spread this all over the world, he probably wouldn't have seen that information.
Well, what happened, if I'm not mistaken, on the Abu Ghrab photos, were they not leaked?
And then the administration was forced to acknowledge, and that begot an investigation.
So in this case, you can't blame the media.
I mean, the media, this is made to order.
The media doesn't practice self-restraint like this.
The media is not citizens of the United States.
Maybe a shock to some of you.
Let me take you back.
It's the first Gulf War.
It's 1990, 1991.
And we're bombing Baghdad.
And Bernard Shaw and two other CNN people are holed up in the Al-Rashid Hotel.
The Al-Rashid Hotel ends up being an allied target, meaning we're hitting it, which means that Bernard Shaw and a couple others have to make tracks out of there.
So they do.
They make tracks out.
CNN brings them back.
The Defense Department asked to debrief them.
Military commanders wanted to talk to Bernard Shaw and others about what he'd seen, what they'd seen, maybe gather some intel on the Iraqi enemies.
Bernard Shaw refused.
He said that he would not compromise his sacred journalistic principles and give one side an advantage over the other because he was an unbiased, uninterested in the outcome reporter.
And it was not up to him to determine who won and who lost.
Therefore, he refused to tell the CIA anything that he had seen or witnessed while holed up in the Al-Rashid Hotel.
And I remember being flabbergasted by this.
Remember, this is three years into this program, essentially, maybe four.
And I'm stunned that an American reporter is shutting out his own government, refusing to help his own country.
And he said, but I'm not an American when it comes to this.
I am a journalist, and I cannot engage in bias.
Of course, we all knew that they were biased.
This was simply Bernard Shaw refusing to help a Republican administration.
But I kept asking, hey, Bernard, where do you think your press freedoms come from, dude?
Who enables you to do what you do with constitutional protection for what you do?
Where is it in the world that you have something called the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution?
It's the United States of America that provided Bernard Shaw and every other journalist with the library of their freedoms.
And to not acknowledge that and to claim he couldn't choose sides, which he did.
He never did voluntarily give.
Not that he had any data anyway.
It's not the point.
Well, let's move forward here to Abu Ghraib.
Somebody in the regime, some of the Bush administration leaked those pictures.
The first picture was of the pyramid that we had forced Abu Ghraib prisoners to make, much like we do cheerleaders.
You know, cheerleaders make pyramids out of themselves.
And another picture, we had the Abu Ghraib people wearing their underwear on their heads.
And this was deemed to be cruel and inhumane treatment by the American left to force these prisoners to make a pyramid out of themselves and to wear their underwear on their heads.
Ew.
That is inhumane.
Anyway, somebody leaked those pictures in the media ran well.
Now, I understand your point that ultimately nobody would have known about those pictures had the media not plastered them everywhere.
But you can't, the media is not going to not run those pictures.
Those were leaked.
Those pictures were leaked by probably a Clinton holdover.
This is George H.W. Bush now, don't mistakes.
No, not a Clinton holdover.
This is somebody, the career leftist in the Pentagon was simply trying to embarrass George.
No, no, no, I'm this is 2000.
This is Bush.
So it would have been a Clinton holdover of Bernard Shaw was the era in the 1990s, early 90s.
So, you know, and one of the things that Bush did, Bush refused to get rid of the Clinton appointees at state and at DOD.
And the reason that he did refused to get rid of, he was trying to, remember the Florida aftermath, and Bush was trying to smooth the waters.
And Bush was trying to smooth over any ill feelings, trying to show that he could be cooperative and bipartisan, and we would work together.
And he refused to do what most incoming presidents do and clean out and put his own people, particularly in the appointed positions, as well as some of the career positions.
So there are a bunch of Clinton holdovers.
There had to be, and that's who leaked this.
You can't blame the media for doing it.
You can't blame the media for reporting it.
It was women's underwear they were being forced to wear on their heads, but that was the real shame because, after all, these are Islamists.
And we know what they think of women here to being forced to wear women's underwear while making pyramids of it.
Ooh, that's so inhumane.
I mean, it's almost as bad as waterboarding, the left told us.
The point is this: the pictures were out, and the left had embarked on a crusade to damage the war effort, not just the war on terror, the war in Iraq.
And the media, I'm not saying the media didn't play a role here, but you can't hold the media accountable for this because they had these photos leaked.
It caused them to investigate, try to find others.
Now, what this is all about, I made to you a prediction last Thursday or Friday, based on an email I got from a friend.
A friend of mine sent me an excited email.
I think it was Thursday night.
One of the two terrorists who had attacked the French magazine had claimed that he had been inspired to join Jihad because of the Abu Ghraib prison photos.
And we had been talking earlier that day on the program about that.
My friend was all excited that I was going to be right and made a point.
And I had to correct him.
I said, you're missing the point on this.
What's going to happen now is that since one of these guys that blew up, killed 12 people with the magazine in Paris, claimed that he became weaponized, if you will, because of the Abu Grab photos.
When this is all said and done, this act of terrorism in Paris against the magazine is going to be blamed on George W. Bush.
I made that prediction.
It was either Thursday or Friday.
And lo and behold, ladies and gentlemen, I have two different places where it's happened.
Foreign Policy Magazine, which is a publication of the New World Order bunch.
What is it?
The Council on Foreign Relations.
Appearing on MSNBC late last week, David Rothkopf, CEO and editor of the FP Group, which publishes Foreign Policy Magazine.
I think we have to be just as worried about the reaction to the attack from nationalists, from right-wingers, from people who've sought to drive this wedge.
You know, one of the reports has it that one of these guys who led this attack was radicalized by reading about Ubu Ghrab.
Prior to that, he was not an extremist.
So this guy jumped right on that and has started blaming Bush, this guy from Foreign Policy Magazine.
And then the independent UK did the same thing over the weekend, exactly as predicted would happen.
Right here on this program.
Paris attacks do not blame the atrocities on security failures.
World of view of the causes of last week's carnage are political, a blowback from the wars in the Middle East.
The author, Patrick Coburn, an Irish journalist, been a Middle East correspondent since 1979 for the Financial Times and now at present at the Independent.
So just as I predicted, two separate instances of the photos at not the photo, but George W. Bush, George W. Bush, because he led this inhumane treatment of Muslim prisoners at Abu Ghraib, is responsible for what happened.
And some of the things that we heard on the Sunday shows yesterday, Eugene Robinson, Washington Post, are you ready for this?
Eugene Robinson, Washington Post said, thank God this didn't happen here because it would have been even worse given how lousy we have gun control laws.
I kid you not, it's a good thing this event didn't happen here because these terrorists would have had even a bigger time with it because our gun control laws in Paris, the cops are not on, you can't get any worse than that.
And the cops arrive on bicycles and all they have were billy clubs.
Meanwhile, the terrorists have military-grade weapons, AK-47s, Kalishnikovs.
I think they even had some grenades, rocket-propelled or otherwise.
And clearly they had been militarily trained and rehearsed and equipped.
And Eugene Robinson, thank God it didn't happen here.
Oh my God, the gun control laws, and this is as easy as guns are to get in this goal.
It could have been even worse.
It's the most asinine thing.
It's depressing.
I mean, you think these people are least smart, common sense, and you find as days go by that they have neither.
Got to take a quick timeout.
We'll be back after this, folks.
Don't go away.
Back to the phones.
We go.
Yeah, Eugene Robinson, if somebody – anyway, here's Dale in Ventura, California.
Dale, I'm glad you called.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Let's get talking again, and a happy birthday to you.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I just wanted to point out that it's painfully evident to anybody who wants to pay attention from support from the Army-based shooting and calling it workplace violence to pulling the truth out early against the wishes of the commanders to not taking a firm stance with any of the terrorists out and saying we just have to basically not slander them.
And then you have the woman who wants to be president claiming that we have to, you know, understand them that this administration, this president, sympathized with the terrorists, and it's going to be the undoing of this country.
Wait, just as, well, hold it a second.
That's quite a charge that the president is sympathizing with the terrorists.
Where do you get that?
It's very evident in his stance and the fact that he's been allowing this country to basically back down from anything and has weakened this country.
And it's all come from the top down.
Yeah, but it's backing down from everything, not just militant Islamists.
He's backing down from everything, except the Republicans.
He will not back down from the Republicans.
He's standing at all against the Republicans.
But he's also allowed the militants to spread from one country during his six years to 35 countries.
And they're working closer and closer.
And now he's releasing leaders how to get into the assist militant Islamists, or is he just trying to get the United States' role in the world changed?
He is.
And I think he's allowing it to spread to where sooner or later this country is going to be in deep trouble.
Sooner or later?
Well, I have read a report recently that there's supposed to be 22 terrorist training camps operating within the U.S. Training camps?
Training, actual places where they are gathering and practicing.
And they've been working real hard with their embrace of the U.N. treaty.
Let me tell you something.
If that's going on, if and I must say, I have not come across that.
I've come across notices of sleeper cells, and I've come across references to mosques and what may be going, but actual training camps, 22 terrorist training, if that were happening, we would know it.
So, but here's the thing, folks.
Well, I was just going to say, a lot of people have been dragged into thinking this way.
There are a lot of people to none of this makes any sense.
So, if it doesn't make sense, there has to be some other explanation.
If common sense doesn't explain, for example, why are we automatically walking out on the world?
Why are we surrendering Iraq?
Why are we surrendering Afghanistan?
If the common sense answers don't work for people, they're going to go elsewhere and try to come up with answers that satisfy themselves.
I've often been fascinated by the way people think, and there's no question that there's a group, I don't know how big, I don't know what their composition is, but and there always have been.
Doesn't matter who the president is, there have always been people who think that the powers that be in Washington are working hand in hand with our enemies to undermine the country.
It's happened for all my life.
They thought it about Bush.
They've thought it about Carter.
They thought it about Zbigniew-Zezhinsky, David Rockefeller, New World Order, all this stuff.
And some of it just the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, it never ends.
This stuff, however, is more widespread than I recall.
Some of these other theories having been.
And look at the New York Daily News headline today: picture of four leaders, Kerry, John Kerry, Holder, Biden, and Obama.
And the headline, You Let the World Down.
It's all because none of them showed up at this rally on Sunday in Paris.
You let the world down.
Obama finally invisible decides not to be part of it.
This kind of thing does contribute to people having these attitudes.
I think the more sensible explanation for all of this is something I've already shared with you.
And I, you know, Ralph Peters had a great, he was on Fox yesterday morning.
Ralph Peters had a great line about Obama.
He said he's like one of these college kids that ran around wearing a Cheguevara t-shirt, who's still wearing it, who has never graduated, never gone beyond being a big idolizer of Cheguevara.
He's still of that mentality.
And I like that as an illustration or as an analogy, but clearly Obama has problems with the United States' superpower, thinks it needs to be cut down in size.
And whatever other alliances there are, who knows?
Got to take a break, though.
I appreciate the call, Dale.
Thanks much.
We will be back.
Don't go away, folks.
Well, I know this headline, this story, going to thrill a lot of people.
Mitt Romney considering third run for the White House.
And there's now a brand new story about the long time rivalry between Romney and the Bush family.
Were you aware of that rivalry?
You were not aware of that right before you heard about it over the weekend.
I was not aware of that rivalry either.
But apparently it's deep and apparently it's serious.
▲
Export Selection