All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 7, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
32:28
January 7, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my good friends, and welcome back, Rushlin Boy Behind the Golden EIB microphone, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Great to have you here.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
CNN.
No sooner do I speculate than the drive-by media makes me a truthseer.
CNN running a Chiron graphic, a banner that says, Charles Ebdu Magazine's controversial past.
You see, it was all their fault.
They brought it on themselves.
They have a controversial past.
Now, this is a news network.
This is supposedly where a bunch of journalists are.
And the same thing can be said about Charl Ebdu.
It's a magazine.
There are journalists who work there.
And there are journalists who got killed there.
There's even an organization of journalists called a Committee to Protect Journalists.
And it's designed to do whatever they can to shield journalists from danger when they venture forth into war-torn areas to cover the news.
And so here come ISIS.
Here comes ISIS wiping out 11 people at a magazine where there are journalists and CNN runs a graphic claiming that the magazine has a controversial past.
So clearly CNN does not believe in freedom of the press.
Apparently the media should not be free to mock anyone.
Only conservatives.
Only the Tea Party.
If the Tea Party gets mocked, fine and dandy.
This is really CNN ought to be among the leading defenders of what happened to these journalists at this magazine.
I'm using the term journalists loosely, but that's what they call themselves.
And CNN setting the stage here for blaming the magazine for offending these.
I guarantee I knew it.
I knew it was held.
I knew it was a widely held view.
I didn't think that we would learn the truth of it this quickly, but we did.
And so that's going to open a floodgates.
And you wait.
It ain't going to be long now before this is going to become a meme or a narrative.
The magazine brought it on.
Hell, that's what CBS is trying to do.
White House questioned French magazine judgment in 2012.
So it's actually already begun.
Drive-by media is setting the stage for people to be led to believe the magazine had this coming.
They did it.
Even a magazine of journalists, which you would think other journalists would defend.
Okay, now we are going to get to phone calls here in this segment.
There's two stories here.
This is, you know, because of our children's book series, Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims, the fact that a time capsule that was planted, if you will, by Paul Revere and Samuel Adams was opened yesterday in Boston.
Folks, This is uncanny news to us.
Paul Revere and Samuel Adams left a time capsule.
It was found and it was opened yesterday.
It did not contain Obama's birth certificate.
Many people were thinking that it might, but it didn't.
Certainly frowning at me, what are you talking?
Gotcha.
Obama's birth certificate, a time capsule for $1,700?
Yep.
A lot of people were hoping he'd be in there, but it wasn't.
Anyway, I'm not going to go into the details now because there'll be a better time for it.
But I have to tell you this.
I have to do this next one because I really do believe that what's happening on college campus and has been happening for a long while is part of why and how our culture is being ripped to shreds.
I really believe that the professoriate, that faculties are populated by some of the most extreme kooks that this country produces.
And they are disguised as intellectuals, deep thinkers, even almost an aristocracy.
And they're kooks.
And the more we learn about some of the professors, it doesn't matter.
It could be Ivy League, could be division, junior college, whatever.
They're just everywhere.
And they're some of the most lame-brained people.
And like this, Catherine McKennan teaching girls in her feminist class that all sex is rape, even the sex in marriage.
And she taught that class for years.
And I guarantee you that young women came out of that class believing, obviously.
And then I can't think off the top of my head any other examples, but they are legion.
Don't have time to list them all.
Some of the weird stuff and not just feminist studies.
I mean, everything, environmental studies, you name it, that's coming out of college campuses today.
But women's studies, I think, is really where some of the most irresponsible, damaging, destructive stuff is being taught to young women today.
It is so bad that increasingly young men are deciding not to even go.
They don't even want to be around the young women who are coming out of these classes.
And there's a story here.
It's a UK Daily Mail.
It is about a woman celebrating 10 years of marriage to her two pet cats.
Now, I will admit to you that this is uproariously funny.
And 10, 15, 20 years ago, we'd have had a whole update ready to go and making fun of this and laughing at it.
But the problem is, this is not that strange anymore.
And I think this is the kind of crap that happens to women when the feminazis are turned loose on them.
Everywhere they run into them, be it on college campus, wherever feminazis run into unsuspecting young women and get their hooks into them, they end up hating men, thinking that they're going to get raped every time they leave the house.
They're taught that men are a predator culture just waiting to descend on them and cast them aside after use.
It's sick.
It is really sick.
And these feminists are a bunch of bitter women to whom life has been very unfair, and they're taking it all out on these young women that end up in their courses or classrooms or wherever else.
This woman's name is Barbara, I'm sorry, Barbarella.
What does that tell you?
She's 48 years old, Barbarella Buckner, celebrating a 10th anniversary of her marriage.
She married 14-year-old cats Spider and Lugosi in January of 2004.
She says that they make her happier than a human husband ever could.
Now, stop and she is serious.
Now, folks, as I say, 10, 15 years ago, this would have been one of the lead items in the first hour.
We'd be laughing ourselves silly for the other two hours.
I remember those days.
And we would have had a Feminazi update, and we still could.
She says her two cats make her happier than a human husband ever could.
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait, but there's more.
Cats consoled her during a breakup with her last serious boyfriend.
She now lives, she's a Londoner, she now lives in Lanzarot with her feline husband.
That's what this story says.
When Barbarella Buckner split from her partner of seven years, the 48-year-old thought she would never find love again.
But then, love struck again, albeit from a very unusual direction.
Now, Ms. Buckner is happily married once more to her two pet cats.
She's a web designer.
She says she's never been happier.
She's so devoted to her feline husbands, Spider and Lugosi, that she has their initials tattooed on her right leg.
I guarantee you, no human male would ever get near this woman.
And she probably knows it.
Now, I think this is, you might say, gosh, this woman's nuts.
I doubt this woman was born this crazy, is my point.
I doubt very seriously that when this woman was a teenager, that she fantasized about marrying a couple of male cats.
I doubt that she ever thought she would ever say that she's never been happier as a human being than being married to her two cats.
And I doubt when she was 18 or 20 that she ever said or thought that she had no plans to find a human husband.
So something got hold of this woman.
Well, okay, maybe she was hurt in a really, I don't know, but if that's the reason, everybody gets hurt in a relationship.
Why haven't I married my cats?
I'm telling you, I know we have to have room in our population for everybody and for all kinds.
And I'm not, she can marry her cats.
I don't care.
It's not about that.
I'm more interested in, there's a serious news story here where this woman's making these claims.
Maybe she's a publicity hound.
I don't know.
But there's a picture of her.
There's a picture over here on the couch with the two cats.
Happily married.
Barbarella Buckner, happily married to her two.
What?
What questions have to be answered?
What questions are there?
What legitimate questions are there?
Oh, how the cats make her happy.
I guarantee you, it's all spiritual.
This is the point.
Are you sitting there, you pervert, are you sitting there wondering about how the cats make her physically happy?
There's no way.
This is, I guarantee.
Well, husbands used to do things for wives, but that's the point.
Husbands use wives now.
That's what these women are taught.
Do the cats moan?
Have to ask Jameis Winston.
I wouldn't know.
But I guarantee you, well, I can't guarantee I don't really know.
I'm guessing that I'm going to use a huge benefit of the doubt that this is, there aren't any conjugal relations in this marriage with the two cats.
I guarantee this is spiritual.
What's wrong with this woman?
What's wrong with this woman?
She is certified, certifiable.
I don't think she's been certified yet.
That's the point.
But something got hold of her.
Why in the world?
You can't have this without a concomitant or sorry, concimitant.
I love saying concomitant.
It drives people crazy.
View of men.
You have to have been poisoned about men.
And who's doing that?
It's my point.
Defend the Nazis.
Okay.
Grab a call.
As I said, Mario, Washington, D.C., glad you waited.
Welcome to the program, Mario.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
Thank you for taking my call.
You bet.
You played an audio from John Kerry last hour.
And as I was listening to that, I started screaming at the reason.
I couldn't believe that she would say that the French, this France is the birth of democracy.
Right.
This is supposed to be the Secretary of State for the United States.
He doesn't know that the American Revolution happened 13 years before the French Revolution.
And not only that, the French Revolution happened in 1799.
And it had nothing to do with democracy.
There was a butcher house.
I know.
Look, Mario, you're preaching a choir here.
I don't know what the hell he was talking about.
What are you talking about?
This guy should present his shame.
How can he say that?
It's a problem, right?
He was afraid so much.
He forgot all about his own country.
You know, and then the French went about and visited and killed everybody's head.
Mario.
When they were done with that, they came to a poor home and he proclaimed himself emperor.
Then you restored the monarchy.
So what is democracy you're talking about?
Is he crazy this time or what?
Mario, we needed your call today.
I don't believe that.
I totally understand.
And nobody's going to honor the room.
Nobody's going to call this confidence.
You know, see, he can see, but listen, you think that was French?
Mario.
That sounded like big ratting or whatever it was.
I don't know what it was.
I'm all in with you on this.
Secretary of State doesn't know.
Because I was screaming at the radio state.
What are you talking about?
You know, whatever.
I don't know.
Anyway.
The thing is, he believes this stuff.
That's what you don't understand.
This guy is.
I guarantee he thinks he's the smartest guy in the world, and he believes all this stuff.
The fact that you don't.
You're the idiot.
You're the idiot.
You're the one that doesn't know.
You're the one who doesn't understand.
Meanwhile, nobody knows what he's talking about.
French, birthplace of democracy.
French Revolution.
We're all in here with you, Mario.
Guillotine included.
Quick timeout.
So Snergly asked me during the break if I thought the cats, Spider and Lugosi, know that they are married to this 48-year-old woman, Barbarella.
It's an interesting question, as Tom Broko would say.
Interesting question.
Do you think the cats know they're married to you?
The cats don't know that they're cats.
How can they possibly know?
The real question is, is Barbarella kiddie whipped?
Not do the cats know that they're married to her.
She's obviously kiddie-whipped.
And the fact that she does think she's married to them, are you telling me that it's not time to call a little men in the white coats here?
Napoleon 14th coming to take me away, haha.
Here is, oh, where are we going next?
Just give me a line.
Where are we going next?
Don't tell me two.
What are you on to?
All right, Pat, Emerald Isle, North Carolina.
Great to have you.
I'm glad you waited.
I appreciate your patience.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
My name's Pat.
Yeah, I'm from Emerald Isle.
I'm 71 years old, and it's quite a kick to be able to talk to you.
I'm from the left.
My father was Democratic County Chairman and all that stuff, and all the way up through.
But I heard you talking on the radio, and I really appreciate somebody who's really good at something I'm terrible at, and that's being eloquent, speaking clearly, be able to enunciate every word perfectly.
And one time you said, you're not a newsman, you're an entertainer.
Well, you're a hell of an entertainer.
A golfer?
I'm not too sure about that.
I do want to find out if you ever did break a hundred.
But anyway, it's a pleasure talking to you.
What am I concerned about?
I'm concerned about the casino in Washington, D.C. That's nothing it is, and anybody can have a job for over eight years there.
Why are you concerned about casinos at Washington?
Casino Washington, because they can be there their whole lives and not do anything, not accomplish a goddarn thing.
Who?
You mean elected officials?
No, no, no, the Congress.
Oh, well, that is elected officials.
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
And when you said something about the Democrats where they were arrogant, oh, my God.
Have you listened to the Congress, the leaders of the Republican Party and Congress?
Arrogance?
Boner?
Boehner, whatever his name is?
Oh, my God.
I got kind of.
I know there's arrogance on all sides.
That's what I'm saying.
I'm giving up on politics.
I'm giving up on seeing much happen very good for the middle class in this country now because it's just about extinct.
I've retired in the Postal Service, worked there 30 years ago.
Well, you know, it's not extinct, but you have a point because it's getting harder and harder to stay in the middle class.
That is a valid point.
Right.
The economy in this country is transmorged in a profound dialectic way.
And it is having a deleterious effect on those who consider themselves to be members of the middle class.
Yeah, I'm watching my income, my retirement that I work for is watching it shrink up day by day, you know.
But I'm the lucky one.
These people not being able to get a job.
It's just scaring me.
And when they get a job, what do they get?
$10 an hour?
Good luck with that one.
I mean, forget it.
You're automatically going right into the poor class.
And it's just that bothers me.
And the other thing is all our young kids getting on heroin.
That's probably my number one, not complaint.
I'm just scared.
Yeah, that's all horrible.
It's a really horrible thing.
But who was he talking about when he bonered?
Who was boner?
Rush Limbaugh with half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
A household name in all four corners of the world.
Here's Randy in Vandorgan.
Hey, Randy, I'm glad you called, sir.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hi, Rush.
Well, Mega Dittos from a Thousand Time Caller and a first-time getter-thruer.
Well, welcome.
Great to have you here.
Well, thanks to be able to talk to you.
What I want to say is that the militant Islamic massacre that happened in France today is a direct result of their ill-thought-out French immigration policy of the 1960s, 70s, and 80s.
They realized they had a low repopulation rate.
They wanted to get in low-educated workers to do service jobs.
They went to the Middle East, and what they got was a country full of Islamic people.
The French people were having a repopulation rate of about 1.3 children per couple in some article I read about 10 years ago.
And the Islamic people from the Middle East were having about 10 kids.
So as a result, they have about 40% of the population is Islamic now, and it doesn't take that many militants to, you know, do what's happening there.
It's like what happened here on 9-11.
People who were in the country, either illegally or questionably legally, began doing things like these massacres, and it's just terrible.
And it's the result of their education policy.
And we have the same thing coming in America in the future with our immigration.
This is an interesting theory that you have.
The UK has done much the same thing.
The UK has pretty much had an open border situation.
And again, both in France and the UK, the open borders policy was directly rooted in fear.
It was not economics.
It may have been a little bit in France, but in France, they ghettoized them.
The Muslim population, the immigrant population, does not live, they've got their own areas and their own erundecement, and a lot of it's poverty-stricken.
And I'm not saying that this is an outbreak or outgrowth of poverty because these people are not.
Most terrorists are not poverty-stricken.
It's quite the opposite.
But anyway, there was political correctness.
I say fear, political correctness.
And the Brits, it's not the same country.
And depending on who you talk to over there, if you know the right people, they will tell you it's not the same.
Many think they've already lost the British identity, largely due to Middle Eastern immigration, not just Muslim, but all over the place.
However, let's go to the audio soundbites on this because the esteemed, I can't believe I'm going to play a soundbite.
Judith Miller.
But we have it.
So, yes, yes, a former New York Times reporter, Judith Miller, got picked up by Fox.
I can't believe, you know, gee, Judith Miller, this streamist says all these odd things, but we have it.
And she says that it's not an immigration problem, that France's problem with Muslims is because they in France supported our policy in the Middle East.
Which means that this happened because the United States supports Israel and the French are our ally.
This was, in fact, it was on Fox today, Fox and French.
I really can't believe that I am going to play a soundbite, Judith Miller, but Cookie gave it to me.
The question was asked by Brian Kilmead.
He said, the message that the terrorists want you to take away, and many will take, is grab the Christians, doesn't matter.
Don't worry about making fun of the Jews, but keep Muhammad out of this.
That's the message of this attack.
I lived in Paris, and we weathered the first round of extremist attacks in the mid-80s.
France may be vulnerable in a way that the United States is not.
France has five to six million Muslims, many of whom, two million of whom are said to be believers, and the others who are maybe Muslim in name only.
But the French have had a long-standing problem because of their Algerian war, because of their actions in the Middle East, because of their support for American policy.
It has nothing to do with French policy, nothing to do with immigration.
No, no, no, no.
Support America.
See, it's all in these people's minds.
It all comes back to our fault, folks.
I mean, they are who they are.
I'm not making up when I tell you who they are.
They are who they are.
I just listen to what they say and pass it along to you.
And I'm telling you, she is from this crowd of people that buys into this whole grievance industry business.
That anybody has a grievance against us is justified in having it.
It's our fault, and we better realize it, and we better start making amends, that kind of thing.
But five to six million Muslims, two million of whom are said to be believers.
I am sorry.
There's no such thing.
Have you see, this is the again, it's Americanizing everybody.
Yeah, we have some Catholics, but they're not practicing.
They're like they're pro-choice.
So, yeah, we got a lot of Catholics, but they don't listen to everything the Pope says.
And yeah, we got a lot of Christians, but, you know, and we have a lot of Hindus, but they Americanize everything.
The idea that there are out of five to six million Muslims, three to four million who really don't care.
Sorry.
I don't think it works that way.
But you have to make allowance because it is Judith Miller.
Now we move on to Christiana Manpur.
And did you notice the way I said her name?
Her name is not a name.
It's a string of syllables.
And you have to be able to do the syllables right to get the name right.
Christiana Manpur.
Where does the first name end and where does the second name begin?
If you just hear what, what?
Christiana Manpur.
It was like Joe Montana was one word.
Joe Montana.
It wasn't Joe Montana.
It was Joe Montana.
Well, here it's Christiana Manpur.
Hey, what's the first name?
What's the second name?
Do you know Snurdley?
Okay, first name's Christiane.
And the second name is Aminpur.
Actually, it's Rubin because she married Jeremy Jerry Jumer.
The former Clinton Secretary, Jamie Rubin.
That's right.
She married Jamie Rubin.
He is his baby mama.
I don't know where they live, but it's anyway.
None of this is important.
I'm just letting you know some inside real radio announcer lingo stuff.
Christiana Manpour and CNN's New Day fill-in host Allison Camerada.
What are your thoughts on this attack, Christiana Manpur?
This is a deliberate attack, not on random civilians, but on the press.
Just heard a very interesting analysis by a French senior political analyst who said, unlike previous attacks in the city of London in July 7-7, in Madrid, a few years before that, those were civilians who attacked.
This is directly targeted on journalists.
So Europe now, according to all officials, faces the highest terror alert in many, many years since 9-11.
Because journalists have come under attack.
At least she gets it.
The rest of CNN is out there ready to blame the journalists with their Chiron graphics.
And by the way, it's not just who else is doing it.
Just got a name is I'll have to find there's is it Financial Times?
Who else is?
Hang on a second.
Yeah, Financial Times has blamed the magazine.
And Time Magazine blamed them back in 2012.
I told you it wasn't going to be happening sooner than I thought.
But elements of the drive-bys are now blaming the magazine for offending these guys.
And they're blaming the magazine for not understanding what was going to happen to them if they went ahead and did this.
They're not standing up for freedom of journalists.
They're not standing up for free.
This is what I mean.
You know what I mean.
I don't have to keep saying it.
Brief timeout, my friends.
Sit tight.
Don't go away.
And once more, back to the phones.
This is Ben Emerald Isle, North Carolina, once again.
Great to have you, sir, on the EIB Network.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
Real pleasure.
Thanks for everything you do.
Quick point or concern here.
The administration and their spokespeople have great and grave concern about the publishing of a cartoon.
Yes.
Yet they are willing to and seem unafraid to publish enhanced interrogation reports, photographs from Abu Ghraib, and have no ties or concerns to that leading to violence.
Whoa, that is an excellent point.
I'm going to edit this.
We're on a 40-second delay.
I'm going to pretend I never took the phone call and I'm going to steal that like Fareed Zakaria does.
I'm going to make it my own.
It probably is your own.
No, no, that is an ex here.
We are condemning all these magazines or publishing these people.
What did we do?
We plastered Abu Ghraib pictures all over the world to humiliate the U.S. military.
I'll never forget the one of the pyramid was made out of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib.
And then there was the one, and we published stories about public, they were flushing the Koran down the toilet at Club Gitmo.
That is exactly right.
That is a great point.
Thank you, sir.
You know what you're doing.
Well, it does illustrate the hypocrisy.
You know, here they are getting on this magazine for publishing their cartoons.
And what did we do?
I mean, those Abu Ghrab photos, remember how the Democrats reacted to those?
Oh, my God.
We almost had to impeach Bush over that at Cheney and Halliburton.
Yeah, and the Democrat CIA report with all the horrible things we did, like waterboarding and feeding them insure, dire technique, interrogation techniques at Club Gitmo.
That is really, it's kind of a hollow thing here for the regime to get all over the place.
Then we hyped this video that nobody ever saw and made sure that millions of people saw that.
That's and a Democrat staff report on terrorism, the interrogation technology, that's not even true.
That is exactly right.
That's an excellent point.
And I did think about stealing it, but then I was overtaken by my own integrity.
Well, that's it, my friends.
Sadly out of time or a busy broadcast today, but I'll tell you what I'm I've still got this stuff from Monday and Tuesday, and I've got it saved, but we're going to get to it.
I really want to get into the time capsule, the oldest U.S. time capsule was opened yesterday by, it was a Paul Revere Sam Adams time capsule, and it's just, I mean, it has especially poignant meaning for us.
What with our Rush Revere time travel adventures with exceptional American series?
And I want to get to these two stories, The Economist, Home of the Unbrave, about how we're raving, raising fearful children afraid to take risks.
It all relates to what we were talking about today.
And I really apologize for playing the Judith Miller soundbite, but it was there, and it related to a call.
So I hope you'll forgive me.
▲
Export Selection