All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 12, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:18
November 12, 2014, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we are back.
It's great to have you here, my friends.
L Rushbow, your guiding light.
America's real anchor man.
Show prep for the rest of the media that follows.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Here at the distinguished Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, uh, phone number if you want to be on the program 800-282-288-2, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Just a little more on the outrageous discovery that Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare, admitted Sunday, and still this hasn't shown up in the drive-by media that they lied.
They had to lie.
They proudly lied, happily lied, laughingly lied, in order to get this monstrosity, this this disaster passed and signed into law because the American people were too stupid to understand it.
We found another Gruber live, by the way, and I've got I've got a uh a little bit here on Gruber and subsidies, which is the subject matter of the latest case the Supreme Court has agreed to hear on Obamacare.
We just found another Gruber live back on December 28th of 2009.
Gruber wrote a Washington Post op-ed, the title of which was Cadillac Tax Isn't a Tax.
It's a plan to finance real health reform.
Now bear in mind we have him on tape saying the Cadillac tax is a tax.
And I want you to hear it.
It's Audio Soundbite Number 11.
This is the one I only played partially because he I demanded the tape be stopped when he accuses the Republicans of trying to confuse people about the bill.
The man who admits lying about it is now accusing on Boston television last night the Republicans are trying to confuse you about this.
Let me tell you, folks, there's a lesson here.
I don't care what the bill is.
I don't care what the legislation is.
If it comes to the Democrat Party, you had better damn well assume they're lying to you about that, too.
Something they want that does not have popular support, you can rest assured they're lying about it.
That would only be the smart thing to do.
Now, here first is the soundbite.
This is Gruber.
Last night, the second phase of his apology for a poor choice of words on WGBH in Boston.
I think that this comes to a master strategy of the Republican Party, which is to confuse people enough about the loss they don't understand that the subsidies they're getting are because of the law.
It goes back to the old Jimmy Kimmel bit where he asked people if they liked Obamacare, and they said no, and he asked people if they liked the Affordable Care Act, and they said yes.
Now, the subsidy business, this is something that is is at the Supreme Court now.
And let me just briefly again explain what this, and we're gonna get to your phone calls in due course, too.
It's all coming up.
The only Americans that qualify for subsidies are those that get Obamacare through a state exchange.
That is in the law.
Well, the regime encountered a problem.
Most states didn't set one up.
Many states that were run by Republican governors said we don't want any part of this because Obamacare is, among many other things, a massive shift of expense from the federal government to the states.
The federal government mandating that the states spend all of the new money or the vast majority of it so that Obama could get a score from the CBO of Obamacare being less than a trillion bucks because they were offloading all the spending on the states.
And a bunch of Republican governors said, no way, we're not doing this.
So if you don't live in a state that has exchanges, you can't get a subsidy.
Well, when they found that out at the regime, they set up their own exchanges, which the law does not permit.
The law specifically states that to qualify for subsidies, you have to get Obamacare through a state exchange.
They started offering subsidies from their own federal exchanges.
Healthcare.gov.
Can't do it.
It's a violation of the law, and this is what the Supreme Court Has just agreed to hear.
Now, this Gruber op ed back on December 28th of 2009 in the Washington Post entitled Cadillac Tax Isn't a Tax.
It's a plan to finance real health reform.
We have him on tape.
And the second apology, the second video.
Let me let me see if don't know that I have it here specifically, but he's on tape as saying that the Cadillac tax is a tax.
In fact, I think I just played it.
I'm getting starting to get confused here with what I've.
Is it number let me number eight?
Let me find it.
Play it.
I don't have it in front of me, play it.
I'll see if it's the right one.
They said, look, what you and economics nerds want to do is you want to say that for people who expensive health insurance plants, they will no longer get a 40% tax break.
What if we instead just levy the 40% tax on the insurance companies that sell these terrible expensive Cadillac plans?
We said, well, that's pretty much the same thing.
They're both that in that task.
Okay.
So basically, we now have the Cadillac tax.
Yeah, that's it.
That's the second discovery.
And if you didn't hear that, let me quickly repeat what he said here.
They said, look, what you economic nerds want to want to do is you want to say that people, for people with expensive health insurance plans, they'll no longer get a 40% tax break.
Well, what if we instead just levy a 40% tax on the insurance companies that sell these terribly expensive Cadillac plans?
Well, we said that's pretty much the same thing.
They proposed it, and that passed because American voters are too stupid to understand the difference.
They started laughing.
So he is on tape saying the Cadillac tax is a tax.
But he had an op-ed in the Washington Post in 2009 saying it isn't.
He lied in the op-ed in the Washington Post in 2009, if he was telling the truth last year.
He's calling it an off-the-cuff remark that ended up in his routine, as though he's a stand-up comic running.
It's just an off-the-cuff remark.
The American voters are stupid.
It's just a joke.
It's an inside joke.
You don't really think that.
Yes, you do.
You only mentioned it five times, and it's not only it's it's something that you believe about everything.
It's something that every Democrat believes about the American people, particularly elected Democrats.
They all think you're stupid.
They all think you're incompetent.
That's why they want so much power to run your life.
You're not qualified.
You're not capable.
They hold you in contempt.
He's being brazenly honest here when he talks about how stupid he thinks you are.
But in in 2009, in an op-ed in the in the Washington Post, he writes the Cadillac tax isn't a tax.
It's a planned finance real health reform.
But we've got him on tape saying the Cadillac tax is a tax.
So apparently Gruber thought that Washington Post readers were too stupid, and he had to lie to them, too.
This is this is still still the Washington Post has evidence on their own pages of this man.
Brazenly lying to the readers of that paper.
And it doesn't matter.
Trey Gowdy was on Fox News last night with Megan Kelly.
She asked him about this.
She said for years now the American public has disliked this law, Obamacare.
They've complained that they felt it was crammed down their throats that there was dishonesty in the process.
They were not told the full story, and now you got the chief architect of the law on camera saying, Yeah, well, we had a lie.
You're too dumb to know what's good for you.
It's really serious in a participatory democracy when you tell your fellow citizens that you're either not smart enough to understand the truth or we can't tell you the truth because you wouldn't go along with it.
Well, if you wouldn't go along with it, maybe you shouldn't pass the law.
It's not the responsibility of your viewers to read thousand-page bills.
Hell, the people who voted on it didn't read it before they voted on it.
So it's not my fellow citizens' responsibility to read this bill.
I would say this to the professor put down the cognac and the lost writings of J.D. Salinger.
You want to see how stupid our fellow citizens are.
Take a look at last Tuesday night because they rejected you, this bill, and this administration.
That is exactly right.
And boy, has that continued to pop up all over the cable TV universe.
Katrina Vanden Hoovel.
What network was she on, certainly, where you saw her commenting on me.
Katrina I was one of the favorite.
Oh, she wrote a column.
Yeah, they're all they're all limb boys, got this stupid belief that the voters said stop Obama.
You know, these people are so damn arrogant.
It's like I I mentioned to you one time this the way the sports media is carrying the ball here on the Redskins name change.
And it's a trick that they play.
And it derives it, it it stems from their arrogance and their conceit.
Okay, so to a bunch of sports writers, it's just outrageous.
It's a rage that the Redskins call themselves Redskins.
And so we've got to change name.
And they begin the project to get everybody agree to change, and they assume that everybody agrees with them.
They assume that there is massive national agreement the Redskins need to change their name.
So that when anybody disagrees, they end up being portrayed as extreme fringe kooks.
When the truth is the majority of Americans don't give a damn.
Frankly, they're concerned about other things.
But the sports media, that's all that matters when they get off on it, and they run around acting like they are in the majority.
That's what Gruber is doing here.
That's what all of these Democrats do.
And even now, after Obama has been soundly rejected, and after the American people said to the Republican Party, we want you to stop him, they're all over TV saying that's not what this is.
They can't get their arms around the fact they've been rejected.
That's simply not possible.
Reject us.
Why, why we're why we're the best.
I mean, we're the big click.
I mean, what they reject us, not possible.
And they run around thinking this.
But here's Gruber.
I mean, you talk about putting two cans of excrement right in front of the guy and giving him all kinds of warning to not step in it.
He stepped in both of them.
It's just it's such a breach.
And they say they care so much about the little guy, the disadvantaged taking advantage of little guy, and look how they're putting the screws.
And look how they really think, and what they really think of people.
Next up with Trey Gowdy, uh, Megan Kelly said voters bounced out 28 senators who voted in favor of this law.
28 or 29.
And that's true.
28 to 29 Democrat senators who voted for Obamacare are gone.
Sayonara no mass their history.
And yet, Mr. Gruber thinks the American public stupid, and yet they're smarter than he thinks because they doubted his assertions at the time and they've doubted them ever since.
I would hope my fellow citizens would keep this in mind the next time anybody tries to sell them a quote comprehensive piece of legislation, whether it's Dodd Frank, whether it's the immigration bill the president so desperately wants, comprehensive is Latin for there's lots of bad stuff in here, and he just proved that he is willing to lie.
He is willing to lie because he has the arrogance of thinking that he knows what is best for this country, and the citizens and the voters do not.
So keep that in mind the next time anybody tries to sell you on a big piece of legislation by calling it comprehensive.
I think it's worse than Gruber and his ilk willing to lie because they have the arrogance of thinking he knows what's best for the country and the citizens and voters do not.
I think it's worse than that.
And that's plenty bad.
But I think the attitude they run around with, I think they have real contempt for what they call average people.
I think to them, the faculty lounge is where the only brilliance in America is.
That and wherever people from the faculty lounge end up in government.
I mean, it is such an elitist, arrogant, egotistical attitude that they all have.
And their condescension drips with contempt.
Especially after elections like this, where they have been soundly rejected.
how stupid you people are.
How absolutely embarrassingly stupid.
Look what you've done now.
You've just gotten rid of the only really smart people in this country.
And as it turns out, they're some of the biggest real world dumcoffs that you would ever encounter.
This guy included.
You know, this this previous soundbite where Trey Gowdy is uh is talking about uh you can't blame the citizens for falling for the lie they have implicit trust.
It was 2200 pages.
It it is worth mentioning again.
Nobody that voted for this bill read it.
And Pelosi was running around telling everybody that's okay.
You have to pass the bill to find out what's in it.
That should have been one of the biggest red flags, and it probably was the people who heard it.
Anyway, one more trait Gaudi soundbite here, and then uh take a break, come back and start getting in some of your phone calls.
Meghan Kelly said, Do you think the White House needs to speak to this?
We went through the number of contacts that he had personally chairing.
The president did a meeting with him, Gruber touted him as an objective analyst, credible, unbiased, compelling Senate testimony, and all that.
He was presented to us as an honest broker by the regime.
What difference does it make?
I mean, we have the law, we were sold a false bill of goods, it's going back to court, and they're laughing all the way to the bank because they lied, they got away with it, and they got the bill that they wanted.
So my fellow citizens have to keep in mind, fool me once, shame on you.
Ever fool me again, shame on us.
That's the old Hillary Clinton response.
What difference it make now?
Whether he was credible or not.
What difference does it make now whether he's doing any good?
Well, they got what they want, they're laughing all the way to the bank, and they are.
And Obama's laughing all the way to wherever he's going over in China with all his grandiose plans.
They're laughing all the way to the lose the election, no big deal.
In fact, we're going to turn that around and we're going to turn that into a big positive, is how they're looking at it.
Anyway, we've got to take a break.
Sit tight, we'll be back.
Okay, we're going to start in uh Hammond, Indiana.
James, I'm glad you waited.
Appreciate your patience.
Hello, sir.
Hello, sir.
Thank you for taking my call.
Longtime listener and first time caller.
I just wanted to say that for the argument that you have been making this morning.
The Libs and the Dems cannot win on principle of the argument.
They must lie, they must obfuscate, they must attack and destroy those who disagree.
This is nothing but Obama's playbook on amnesty, global warming, net neutrality.
He's going to do the same thing.
They can't he can't win on the principle of the argument, so they'll have to lie and attack those who disagree.
That's a good thing.
And I think it's treasonous personally.
Amen to Trey Gowdy.
Um exactly right.
I'm I'm glad that Trey Gowdy reacted to this the way that he did.
I like Trey Gowdy.
We interviewed him for the Limbaugh Letter.
He's a serious, committed.
I like the guy, really like him a lot.
But boy have you nailed it again.
These people cannot even compete in the arena of ideas.
They don't even want to go there.
This is why, you know, I've stopped appearing, folks, on I'm invited.
H.R. can tell you how many times I get invited to, I don't care what it good morning American Today Show.
I don't go there.
There's no point.
They're not interested in debate.
That's not why they're asking me there.
And there's no point trying to convince them.
There's no try trying point trying to persuade them.
I used to believe when I first started doing this and accepted media invitations to appear.
I can't tell you how naive I was.
It's almost embarrassing to think about it.
I actually thought the journalists were objective, and that I had a chance of persuading them, had a chance at changing their minds.
I that that and I thought they were genuinely interested, since I was new on the scene.
I thought they were genuinely interested in my in my take, that that's why they wanted me there.
And it didn't take long to be sandbagged a couple times after the green room interview, the pre-interview, and then what really happens on the program.
It didn't take me long to figure out they don't care what I think.
They're Not interested in what I think, and they're not open to persuasion, and that's not in any way shape, matter, or form what my appearance is about here.
Their objective, as James said, is not to debate anybody, because they can't.
They'll not win.
They will not prevail, being honest about who they are and what they believe in the arena of ideas.
And so their entire focus, and you see it every day, is to destroy their opponents.
They're not out to level any playing field.
They don't want a playing field.
Their purpose is to eliminate opposition.
They don't want any opposition.
Opposition is uncalled for.
Opposition to us.
How silly.
So I've stopped appearing.
I've stopped trying to talk sense to any of these people because they're not open to it and they're not interested in it.
Their minds are made up, like everybody else on the left.
And their agenda is completely different.
And so there's no way that they're ever going to be persuaded.
That's why I have always said the only objective that we should have now is defeating them.
And by the way, they are the aggressors in this battle.
They're the ones we do not have as part of our arsenal character assassination, politics of personal destruction.
That's not what we do.
We really want people to know what we think, and we really want people to accept it.
We want people to agree with us.
We want an army of people like that.
They don't care.
They're perfectly happy being 10% of the thinking of this country as long as they've got the power over everybody.
This is Leah Peoria, Arizona, and you're next, sir.
Great to have you on a rush limbaugh program.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
I appreciate uh all your your comments, and I appreciate uh the job you've been doing the last uh twenty-five or so years.
Thank you very much.
In light of uh what Mr. Gruber said about how stupid he thinks we are.
Um I wonder if uh ex-Speaker Pelosi must have thought that the entire Democrat uh party was the same stupid because she lied to them as well.
And in light of the election results and the fact that the Democrat Party doesn't have much leadership, isn't there even one Democrat representative that has enough courage or integrity who's willing to stand up to the lame duck or lame quack president um about this bill?
I don't know about Obamacare, but I think Joe Manchin of West Virginia might switch parties.
He's uh giving off some some some indications.
But you you mentioned Pelosi.
There's a story on Pelosi in the politico today, which she says, I don't believe what happened here tonight is a wave.
There was no wave of approval for the Republicans.
I mean, I wish them congratulations, they won the election, but there's no wave of approval for anybody.
There was an ebbing, an ebb tide for us.
And she says she's needed more than ever.
Pelosi said that she is needed now more than ever from plans to harness her power among fellow Democrats to keep her job as minority leader to digging in an Obamacare and the party's economic messaging.
Pelosi is setting up her party to fight to take back the House in 2016.
She said, quite frankly, if we would have won, I would have thought about leaving.
But I'm more needed now than ever.
So we get shellacked.
I've been totally rejected.
That means I've got to stay.
If we had won and been resoundingly approved and welcomed back, I'd have probably quit.
That's how brilliant this woman is.
There's not a Democrat that's going to stand up, Lee.
Those days are gone.
The days where you're talking about is they're not an adult anywhere in this party that's going to stand up and no.
Even among those who've been vanquished, even among those who've been defeated, no way.
It's it's not your dad's Democrat Party anymore.
It's certainly not your grandfather's Democrat Party anymore.
This Democrat Party is uh has undergone a dramatic radical shift.
And I don't even think calling it the Democrat Party is descriptive enough.
It's too confusing.
The Democrat Party used to stand for things that that uh a lot of people, good or bad, really believed in.
Democrat Party doesn't stand for anything that's uplifting or inspiring.
I mean, it's just I think this party has transformed so much and has become radicalized that it's confusing to call them Democrats because that doesn't quite state what they've become and who they really are anymore.
To me, this is this is uh this is breathtaking stuff that is happening here.
And it's being covered up and hidden because other liberal Democrats know how devastating this is.
The media, for example, to report this group of business to be honest about it, undermine the whole premise of Obama.
This guy's gonna admit it the whole premise of this bill was a lie.
Everything about it was a lie.
And now you've got, you know, Obama with with his threatened executive action, and don't discount for a moment.
There are multiple motives for this.
And of course, at the top is actually doing them.
That's, I don't think secondary.
But there's also the resulting chaos.
As Obama floods the zone with you get up one day, you look over here, and there's comes an executive order for amnesty.
And then three hours later, here comes one with punitive energy taxes and so forth to slay the evil monster of global warming.
And then after that, he's gonna sort of regulating the internet.
And you know, well, what to tackle first?
And then you realize none of it's gonna happen lawfully.
It's it's uh it's got multiple purposes.
Then you're gonna have what Ferguson, Missouri, that grand jury is gonna open up one of these days, and that's gonna be more chaos.
You are confused about something, uh, L. Snurdvo.
What?
I know he can't, but he did.
Snurdley says a president cannot unilaterally issue a treaty, meaning what he's done with the ChICOMs.
By the way, what he's done with the ChICOMs, uh I don't know where to start on this.
This is the global warming executive order.
And what Obama has done is agreed to limit emissions in this country and do so starting relatively soon, almost immediately, and exempted the ChICOMs from the same restrictions until 2020 or 2030.
And the ChICOM signed on to it just like that, because they do not have to withdraw and reduce any image.
They can continue growing their economy left and right.
Obama has just agreed to put immediate penalties and shackles on the U.S. economy to save the planet under the premise that we, the United States are the leading violators of the public trust.
The United States is primarily responsible for destroying the climate, for destroying the planet, and we must pay for our past transgressions.
We must pay for all of this false prosperity that we have enjoyed all of these years that was never genuine and thus never really ours, and we must pay that price because this country is despicable what it's done.
And so he has signed this thing.
He can't.
This has to be ratified by the Senate.
He can't do what he has done unless nobody stops him.
It's always going to come down to that.
It can be no other way.
He's not going to stop himself.
The Constitution is there.
It's out there, it's everywhere.
But if you don't honor it, if you pretend it isn't there, which Obama is doing, then the only remedy is to call him on it.
This, you realize how there is no force of there is no rule of law in the Obama administration.
That's the point.
The law has to be enforced by human beings.
The law does not enforce itself.
The Constitution does not enforce itself.
That was my point late last week, maybe earlier this week, I asked an open-ended question.
I wanted people to think about do you realize how fragilely balanced?
I mean, this is the greatest country on earth with more human freedom and dignity than has ever existed in the human race at any time in world history.
And we are only been around for a little over 200 years.
Do you realize how fragility assembled and balanced this is?
It all hinges on everybody, particularly President on down, elected leaders having reverence and respect for the Constitution.
It's the honor system.
Now we have safeguards built in in case somebody decides to shred it, but if the courts are not going to act, if their effect is in effect is no police force, then there is no law, is there?
You can run around, you can't do that.
You can't he's doing it.
The Constitution does not have a living, breathing life where it can enforce itself.
This is why all the talk about the importance of character and morality in elected leaders from the founders in such things as the Federalist Pers.
the Constitution, if it's just seen as a piece of paper that doesn't have any ammunition to it force itself, then why be afraid of it?
I don't believe in that.
I think that was written by a bunch of rich white guys to subjugate everybody else.
I don't believe that Constitution.
The hell with that.
Why should I?
I don't believe it.
I don't have to, I don't have to follow that.
Who says I have to follow that?
I got elected president to do whatever I want.
So long as nobody's going to stop me.
That's how precariously balanced we've always been.
If there isn't respect and a reverence for the document, then the document may as well say whatever you want it to say.
That's why it's to me it's always been crucially important, the people who are elected and put in these extremely important, powerful positions.
They have to be good people.
And there has been so much corruption on the American left.
The judiciary is corrupt.
We've got we have left-wing ideologues everywhere.
Some are disguised as judges, some are disguised as professors, some are disguised as journalists.
Some are disguised as environmental administrators, some are disguised as accountants.
But they're left-wing ideologues.
And they look at the Constitution as an obstacle.
That's it's something in their way.
They don't have reverence for it.
You know the old story I've told countless times, uh Cass Sunstein, a well-known, well-respected legal beagle on the left who believes the Constitution is negative.
From the left standpoint, the Constitution is a series of negative liberties.
Now, stop and just and that's the term they came up with came up with.
What is negative about liberty?
How in the world can the document which codifies the whole notion of God given by virtue of birth, human freedom?
How can that be seen as a negative document?
Well, very easily, if you happen to believe that government is the sun in the solar system, and there is no God, then that document puts you in jail.
That document tells you what you can't do.
That's what's negative.
Charter of negative liberties, the constitu that Obama believes this.
The Constitution is too limiting on government, which is exactly what it was to do.
Limit the government.
The Bill of Rights, the whole thing.
Limit the government.
But to people like Cass Sunstein and Obama and this guy, Gruber, and all of them.
Well, that's no good.
We want a document that describes how much power we have.
We want a document that spells out what we can do, not what we can't do.
And to them, the Constitution is nothing but a list of things they can't do.
And to heck with that.
And so they're on a course and have been for decades to either get around it or to change it, as in the Second Amendment, or anything else in it they don't like.
And they'll try to change things in the system, but if that doesn't work, like the Second Amendment and being able to get rid of that or rewrite it, then they'll they'll take guns away some other way.
And they'll do it after they acquire so much power that there's no way you can stop them.
I mean, it would be wonderful if everything we were taught in junior high in Civics 101 were actually true, that everybody loved the Constitution, and that everybody respected the Founding Fathers, and that everybody had a profound awe and respect for this country.
But the sad reality is there are a lot of people that hate the country and a lot of people who resent the country, and a lot of people think the country, the Constitution is nothing more than a document that allows the persecution of many people and allows and permits the discrimination against many people.
And a document that permits only certain people to get rich and main dates and everybody else be poor.
There are people that believe this.
And they happen to be in the judiciary now, in big numbers.
And they happen to be called professors at colleges and universities.
And they happen to be called journalists when they work at news networks and newspapers.
But they're all left-wing ideologues who have all been raised and educated the way Obama has.
So you ask me, well, he just can't sign treaty like that.
The hell he can't.
He's president, he's doing it.
Anybody stop it?
Chinese agreed.
Why do you mean I can't do it?
Well, the Constitution says he can't do it.
The Constitution saying he can't do it means as much as my writing a document saying he can't do it to him.
Constitution's an obstacle.
Oh, he'll give lip service to how much he respects it.
Lib service to the founders, lib service and all this stuff.
But that's just the continuation of the big lie to everybody, like Gruber's lie on health care.
Anyway, again, my friends, sadly, just a brief pause here.
An obscene profit timeout.
That's again, the left calls profits obscene, so I just, you know, I jokingly call them obscene prophets.
Just to razz them.
We'll be back.
Get this, ladies and gentlemen.
As you know, the uh uh marijuana, marijuana substance marijuana is legal in Colorado, and now the nation's capital, and I think the state of Washington, and where else is it legal?
Anyway, in in Colorado, and I have a story here, U.S. News and World Report, there's a funny story.
Apparently, in an area of town, uh, there are a bunch of these marijuana shops, along with old line antique stores and other uh brick and mortar places on a strip on street called Broadway.
And so the uh the marijuana gang, you know what?
They approach these other businesses.
Hey, let's join forces here and come up with a marketing plan, and uh what what just generate all kinds of traffic here in our section of town here.
And the other businesses said, uh, we don't want to work with you.
James Nessler, who owns Heidelberg Antiques, told one of these marijuana guys, store owners, we don't want to work with you.
Your customers, they're long-haired, maggot-infested, dope smoking, good-time banana rock and rollers.
They go around touching everything and they don't buy anything.
And the meeting went down, and it's actually exactly what he said.
Your customers, they're long-haired stinky types.
We don't want your customers in our stores.
They come around, they pollute everything, they touch everything, they never buy anything.
They just come in here and they just sort of in a daze wandering around, look at things, knocking things over and so forth.
So that the pot shops, though, the marijuana, they think they are revitalizing these blighted neighborhoods and the other stores in the uh in the area.
We don't we don't want to join forces with you.
We don't want your customers in our stores.
Once again, it was I, Ill Rushbone at Cutting Edge, long-haired, maggot infested, dope smoking, good time rock and rollers.
And here Mr. Nestler says, your customers, long haired stinky types, touching everything, don't buy anything.
We don't want them in our stores.
All right, folks, we got to take another break here at the top of the hour.
Senate Democrats are thinking about approving the Keystone Pipeline to save Mary Landrew.
Just thinking about it.
▲
Export Selection