All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 23, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
October 23, 2014, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Come on, that's uh 35 or 40 at least.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, the Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, happy to be with you.
And it's been one of those mornings.
Everything has happened in a crunch.
There hasn't been one relaxed moment in this morning.
And there's not a I mean, not all of it's been show prep.
Just one of those days.
You ever have one of those days where just everything seems to be a crisis?
Every email you get is a crisis.
And they come, it's one of those days where the timing when you get these things, it makes you stop what you're in the middle of to deal with it.
And so when all that when that happens, folks, when I always get worried, oh my gosh, am I not sufficiently prepped to do the program?
Have I let the audience down by being distracted during all this stuff that's been going on?
And what usually happens is we have Barnburner programs in this regard in this situation.
So we'll see.
We will uh we'll roll the dice.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800-282-2882 in the email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
You ever get the feeling, I do.
I'll just I'll just tell you I do some days, and this is one of them.
Like I look at this Canada thing, thing that happened up there, and none of it's surprising to me.
But so many other people claim to be shocked, stunned, in a state of disbelief.
Uh and it's I often find myself uh in in a situation where I can't believe people are not up to speed on things that I clearly think they ought to be up to speed on, particularly things that threaten us.
And of course, the way the media covers events like this kind of adds to the to the confusion.
A crisis as far as the media is concerned is uh is always worthwhile and they milk it.
But this situation up in uh up in Canada, this Muslim convert who uh shot dead a Canadian soldier, everybody going out of their way, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
This isn't terrorism.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, it is.
No, no, no, no, no.
There's no organization going on here.
This is just a one-off a radical.
No, no, no, no, no.
This guy has been programmed to do what he did.
He's been thinking about it for a long time, and his dad was in the resistance in Libya, and in case you need to know his father, uh, fought among anti-Gaddafi rebels in Libya in 2001.
Now, before you get confused on that, Mr. Zihaf was born in Quebec to a Muslim Libyan named Bulgassim Zahef, who appears to have fought uh on the rebels' side in Libya 2001.
Now, keep in mind the rebels in Libya are the ones who attack the U.S. mission in Benghazi.
It kind of all fits together, but if you don't want to admit it, if you don't want to see it for what it is, then of course you're going to join the crowd that claims to be utterly surprised and confused and still looking for answers.
And we we're told the shooter, Mr. Zhalf, is a recent convert to Islam.
It's not a recent convert to Islam.
Committed to Islam quite a while ago.
To run through the list of things.
Ms. Muslim convert shot dead a Canadian soldier is the privately educated son of Canada's immigration chief.
He had his passport revoked, and his links has links to Syrian terrorist.
He's not a recent convert.
This guy has been headed in this direction for a long time, as many are.
You know the real question, and I heard Steve Emerson make this point on TV today, is a well-known terrorism expert.
These guys are all over the place.
You can revoke their passport, it isn't going to change a thing about their behavior.
These these sleepers, if for lack of a better term, these recent converts, if that's what you want to call them, they're all over the place.
The thing that Intel has tough time discerning is which one Of them is going to act at any given time, but they're all capable at any given moment of launching an attack like happened yesterday.
The question is you can take away their passports, you can you can put your head in the sand and think, well, nah, isn't gonna happen.
You can you can hope and pray, but the odds are that the intelligent thing, guided by experience, is to be prepared for it and to dial up intelligence services, try to find out which of people like this are going to act, because there's all kinds of them out there.
Not just in Canada.
They are here in the U.S., they are they are here in the UK, they're all over the place.
Now, this guy had his passport seized seized after being designated a high-risk traveler, despite his mother being on Canada's immigration board.
He had multiple drug and robbery arrests.
He had a 2003 weapons charge.
But he's a late convert.
He had told a friend the devil was after him, and knew a man who is still at large after leaving Canada to join Islamist fighters in Syria.
Stephen Harper addressed his country later, saying that this terrorist attack would not intimidate Canada, placed flowers at the scene today.
I just how does all this happen?
People are asking themselves, okay, where do these people come from?
They're lurking in the shadows.
But what would what would take somebody born in Canada, born in the United States wanting to join ISIS, for example?
Why what's happening to cause that?
Why would people born in the land of the free and the home of the brave to use the cliche?
Why would they be enticed?
Why would they be intrigued?
Why would they be curious about joining a terror group?
Well, yeah, they think America is the source of all evil, but why do they think that?
Okay, so what do we have when you strip it all away?
We have a wacko with a gun driven to kill.
Uh and in a place that anybody was able to enter.
There didn't appear to be a whole lot of security.
I think this event in Canada is another example of how the weak and mentally unstable can be driven insane by propaganda from socialists wherever they find it, in the classroom, in the media, or wherever.
I think they're unstable to begin with, and then they are subjected to a barrage of Western civilization is dangerous, it's bad, it's murderous.
The United States, Canada, whatever, dangerous, bad, murderous, the problem in the world, not the solution.
They hear this over and over again.
And then we come back to people who find themselves wandering aimlessly in life but want meaning.
They want their lives to have meaning.
They want to make a difference, and they're inundated with all of this anti-Western civilization clap trap.
They're inundated, they're pummeled with all of this socialist propaganda that portrays the United States as the problem, the real evil in the world that portrays the U.S. military as its agent.
We see it all over this country.
We see it all over this country.
Not kids turning to jihad, although some are, some are that that is a a direction some of them are taking.
But it's, I think it's a perfect illustration of how all of this works.
I mean, these people that are affected by this are not immune to it, can't be immune to it.
If you are subjected enough and regularly, to an onslaught of how rotten the United States is, how guilty the United States is, if you are subjected to a daily tirade of all the injustices and all the unfairness and all the discrimination and all the inequality and all of the inequity.
At some point you're gonna snap if you're not well adjusted to begin with.
And who knows then what could become attractive to you As you seek to put action to your thoughts, become a hero or what have you.
You know, Mark Stein has a book.
I just talked to him, uh, interview for the Limbaugh Letter, and the subtitle of his new book is called Don't Say We Weren't Warned.
Don't say you weren't warned.
He says, I've been writing for over a decade now about the West's wannabe jihadists, often born and raised in Canada and America and Britain and Australia and Europe.
Some of them converts or reverts, as they call them.
Throughout that period, the past decade, throughout that period, the multicultural delusionists have insisted that Islam's contribution to the diversity mosaic is no less positive than that of the Poles or the Italians.
And now we have pure lame Quebecers and Nigerian South Londoners converting to Islam because it's the coolest gang on the planet now.
And one consequence of that is that a relaxed open capital city will descend into the same lack of security as Washington was.
Stein writes, I love Ottawa.
I know every yard of that stretch of Wellington Street connecting Parliament and the Cenotaphs.
Chateau Laurier is where I always stay when in town.
And not so long ago I walked past that war memorial with a senior minister of the crown.
And we talked about how simple and dignified and profoundly moving it was.
And during my battles with the human rights commissions, I had the honor of testifying the House of Commons and strolling that same center block corridor that the Alahu Akbar loon rampaged down yesterday.
An assault on the heart of the Canadian States title of a piece that he's written about this.
Stein online.
And I think there's every bit of evidence to support what he is saying.
All these wannabe jihadists, born and raised in Canada, America, Britain, some of them converts.
Multicultural delusionists have insisted, oh, there's beauty and there's peace and da-da-da-da-da.
And I'm telling you, you take a out-of-balance mind that has been pummeled over and over and over again with all of the horrible things the United States and Canada and Great Britain have done.
And make no mistake, they're subjected to it, so are you.
We all are, each and every day.
We are all subjected in the classrooms in this country, especially.
Classrooms all the way up from elementary school to the university liberal, pummeled with how rotten this country is, how guilty this country is, how fraudulent our founding was.
And this is a natural end result when you're dealing with unstable minds who are subjected to this kind of assault.
And you know it happens.
I mean, you've had people call here, you've read stories, some of the things their professors inundate them with and teach them, supposedly.
So it's uh it's a it's a rude away, and in the midst of all of this, what are we still talking about?
Amnesty and open borders.
And why are we doing that?
Once again, because we deserve it.
Once again, because we have shut out the rest of the world after conquering their land and stealing whatever they had that we wanted and converting ourselves from an all-sourant to a superpower, now they want back what was legitimately theirs.
And if we have to open our borders and allow them in, then that's the only fair thing we can do.
So it's a combination of self-loathing and political correctness that acts like a lit match thrown on a bunch of gasoline.
And at some point, these explosions are going to happen.
Has Obama called this workplace violence yet?
He hasn't.
He really hadn't called this workplace violence.
Well, I know he refused to call it terrorism.
Uh and he wouldn't even call it man caused disaster.
You know, that's what they used to have to call terrorism.
They banned the term at the State Department.
I know that's that's the point.
They got free health care in Canada, they've got a great welfare state in Canada, his dad's a powerful position in the government.
Taxes on the wealthy, they raise taxes on the rich, they got multiculturalism up there, multiple languages.
What possibly could have been his problem?
I mean, the left supposedly Canada's a beacon.
Canada exists as a beacon, as a as a as a utopian place.
No military, no defense budget.
Why?
Well, they got a military, but I mean they don't not like we do, and this they don't have it.
They don't spend a lot of money on their military.
What are you talking about?
You know, but the Mounties.
They had look, I'm not trying to not trying to put them down.
They're a valuable coalition partner.
Don't anybody misunderstand it.
They're not.
Nobody is ever going to call the Canadian military the focus evil in the modern world, like they call ours.
That's my.
That's that's the only point I made.
Sheesh.
Now the shooter's father.
He did, he did shoot with the Libyan resistance, but it was a year prior to Benghazi.
I was not saying, and I didn't say that he was part of what happened at Benghazi.
I said he was from the group.
Same people that did what they did at our consulate in Benghazi, but he fought with them in 2011, which is a year before what happened, uh what happened in Benghazi.
Brian Ross, ABC News labored all night trying to find a Tea Party connection, I'm sure, but he couldn't.
Canadian officials this morning are calling Michael Zihoff Lebo a terrorist, a convert to Islam.
Records obtained by ABC News show he had a series of minor criminal convictions for drugs and robbery.
And government officials have told Canadian news outlets they had blocked his efforts to travel to Syria to join ISIS.
The mother of the suspected shooter is reported to be a senior Canadian immigration official.
Yeah, look at all of that.
Now there's Brian Ross desperately trying to find that the guy had Tea Party roots, but he couldn't.
He wanted to go to Syria to join ISIS.
So they pulled his passport.
Didn't work, did it?
See, this is the point.
Steve Emerson was making this point.
You could pull their passport left and right.
You can stop them from traveling, but you can't prevent them from acting.
And so the intel services are going to have to try to find a way, and it's very hard to get some kind of an idea which of these people are going to act on their radical beliefs, because they're all over the place out there.
Audio soundbite from Stephen Harper, who is the Canadian Prime Minister speaking about yesterday's shootings.
Of course, Mr. Speaker, I'd be uh very remiss if I did not conclude in uh acknowledging specifically the work of the security forces here on Parliament and the great work of our sergeant at arms.
I don't know.
I have to say this.
You know, whether it's Benjamin Netanyahu, or whether it is Cameron in the UK, whether it's Stephen Harper.
You hear these other leaders.
You hear these other leaders, and you remember kind of leaders we used to have.
This week's events are a grim reminder that Canada is not immune to the types of terrorist attacks we have seen elsewhere around the world.
We are also reminded that attacks on our security personnel and on our institutions of governance are by their very nature attacks on our country, on our values, on our society, on us Canadians as a free and democratic people who embrace human dignity for all.
Exactly.
But let there be no misunderstanding.
We will not be intimidated.
Canada will never be intimidated.
Remember when we used to have leaders that spelled it out like that?
Instead, what did Obama say?
This is yesterday in the White House, yesterday afternoon in Washington.
We don't yet have all the information about what motivated uh the shooting.
We don't yet have uh all the information about whether this was Part of a broader network or plan, or whether this was uh an individual or a series of individuals who decided to take these actions.
So what a contrast or juxtaposition, if you will.
The Canadians, they're not pretending it isn't terrorism.
Stephen Harper went right out there and told everybody why this happened, who did it, and what their objectives were.
And they're not going to be intimidated.
And in Washington, it kind of looked, I don't know, ridiculous.
Well, we don't know.
We don't have all the information.
Well, heaven, workplace wine.
Well, it was workplace.
Well, we don't know.
We're waiting.
We're waiting to find out.
Meanwhile, the Canadian Prime Minister had already spelled it out.
Political correctness on parade there in the White House.
Can't offend any of the wrong groups.
You want to hear an example of what I was just talking about.
Just happened over on CNN.
They have a show called Legal View.
It's hosted by Ashley Banfield, and she's speaking with the Chief National Security Correspondent named Jim Shuto about Michael Z. Half Bibo.
The recent convert to the jihad.
And Ashley Banfield said, this is a guy who had a very troubled past.
He was a drug user.
He had a criminal record that spans at least a decade.
How much of this do authorities think was that he was a troubled guy looking for a cause, that he'd have done it under any cause, or how much of this is that he was radicalized and that others got him to do this?
So you see, the question even skirts the truth.
The reporter here is given two options, and both options include the possibility that he was motivated by others to do this.
Now he was just a troubled guy.
Had no real sense of purpose.
Here's the answer.
Just a few weeks ago, when we were the first to report that an American who went to fight and die for ISIS in Syria, he was a Minnesota man, similar as well.
He had a long rap sheet, lots of run-ins with the law.
He was not raised Islamic or it was not raised a Muslim, he converted to Islam, and then he joined the terror fight.
That's not to say that anybody who converts to Islam by any means is a candidate for this, but when you look at that profile, you often have troubled young men who find this cause as a new identity, a new uh definition, and they jump in.
See, bending over backwards here to excuse the conversion for being responsible here.
Guy converted to Islam, but that may not mean anything.
And as long as we're going to deal with this by not dealing with it, these kinds of things are going to continue to happen.
That's why it was kind of refreshing to hear Stephen Harper define this for what it was, why it happened and who committed it.
It will not happen in our media, it will not happen at the upper levels, the upper tiers of our leadership.
But look at this.
I mean, it's a long rap sheet, lots of run-ins with the law.
And by the way, one thing that we can conclude from all this, this guy did not come from any anything near poverty.
He had educated parents, they had plenty of money.
That profile that terrorists are driven to it because of poverty, often poverty that's often the result of United States policies, somehow.
You can't lay this or that excuse at this behavior.
There's no poverty involved here.
He wasn't raised a Muslim.
He converted to Islam.
And then he joined the terror fights.
Like Mark Stein says, these guys just they want to be a member of the coolest gang going.
And right now, one of the coolest gangs going is Islamic jihad.
It's got a great enemy, and that is Western civilization, capitalism, wealth, what have you.
You know, I see a lot of similarities In this.
When you talk about out-of-balance minds, look at the people involved in Occupy Wall Street.
Some of them seem to be just a hair breadth away going over the edge.
And Occupy Wall Street, you know what's really instructive about Occupy Wall Street?
It was totally manufactured.
Occupy Wall Street didn't really exist.
The mindset was there, but it was not organized.
Occupy Wall Street was put together by elements of the Democrat Party and the American left to combat the Tea Party.
The Tea Party scared everybody because the Tea Party was the essence of natural.
The Tea Party just sprung up out of nothing but genuine reality.
The Tea Party was made up of people who, in many cases, had never ever been involved in any organized political activity outside of voting.
But they were outraged and they were scared over the future of the country and what this administration's policies would wreak.
They feared the spending and the debt would mean punitive confiscatory taxation for themselves, their kids, and their grandkids.
They thought the American dream was hanging in the balance, and so they organized for the first time.
And there was no leader.
There was no single individual that provided the rallying point and the inspiration, the motivation.
That was all on Obama.
That was all Democrat policies.
People had never been in politics, and those people you can't control.
So that's why Obama sicked the IRS on them.
So they wouldn't have a chance to raise any money.
It's why the Republican Party, the Democrat Party didn't want anything to do with them because they were real.
You couldn't control them.
You couldn't bring them in under some umbrella.
There was no way to organize them.
It was the essence of a mass collection of individuals.
Well, the Democrats saw this and panicked and created Occupy Wall Street.
And they used several left-wing blogs to do it, but it was a it was a mirage or it was an illusion.
They tried to make it look like Occupy Wall Street came up as naturally and is a reaction to the Tea Party.
Well, it was a reaction to the Tea Party, but it was an organized effort to put it together, and there was funding behind it.
There was no funding behind the Tea Party.
Funding?
They did it on their own.
That came later.
But Occupy Wall Street was the exact opposite.
It was a political operation.
It was put together.
It was given a title, and they were given marching orders, and that was to go camp out in various parts of Manhattan and other centers of wealth, pitch tents and raise hell, so that the media that could then portray Occupy Wall Street as bigger than the Tea Party and just like them, except a natural outgrowth.
The Tea Party, I can't emphasize enough how frightened it made the entire political establishment.
Because those people want to be able to control everybody under their umbrella.
Donors, voters, uh the agenda, the platform you name it.
Tea Party didn't fit.
There was no way to control them.
They were in politics, but they were outside of it.
They were, they were genuine outside, and they remain so to this day.
They still to this day have the political class, the establishment bamboozled.
So Occupy Wall Street was created, and it's the same thing.
The people in Occupy Wall Street are bombarded every day, and have been for a while with how rotten this country is and how unfair it's been and how discriminatory and all of this.
And I'm telling you, some of the things that I've heard coming out of people there, and some of the threats they've made.
They're just a hair breadth away from the kind of action this guy in Canada took.
It's all around us.
And if you want to be honest, the reasons for it are right in front of our faces.
Some people don't want to admit it, some people don't, because that means you'd have to you'd have to face it.
You'd have to deal with it.
So in that case, we have this gentleman, Michael Zihaf Bibo, who did what he did in Canada yesterday, converted to Islam, joined the terror fright fight, but that's not that that doesn't mean anything.
No, no, no, no, no.
We still don't know why.
We still don't know who.
It's just a sad, sad thing.
And the the hero in Canada, that Sergeant of Arms, have you seen the video?
Do you know?
I know five minutes standing at Plause House Comments.
I know I saw it.
I was stunning.
And I I also, like everybody else, I saw the video of this guy.
Walking back to his office, walking out of his office with the gun.
Five minutes later, he's back after shooting a guy.
Like, just went out for drink of water at the fountain.
He's got the gun in his right hands walking out, does his business.
You don't see that.
He comes back, goes to his office, took care of the shooter, had his gun.
How long is it going to be?
I mean, his name is Sergeant at Arms.
How long is it going to be before the gun control crowd goes nuts on this?
You mean somebody's armed inside the parliament?
Well, that's dangerous.
Blah, blah, blah.
Don't put it past him.
They won't do it today or tomorrow.
But but and they may never, but such a response would not surprise me.
Yeah, five-minute standing ovation for a guy.
How'd they stop this again?
Well, was it a gun, right?
No.
That's another thing.
He didn't need a grief counselor.
And he didn't need to go home and reflect for a couple of weeks.
And they didn't send internal affairs in with a therapist to ask him, do you like shooting people?
Are you worried you want to do more of this?
Do you think maybe you're starting to like killing?
Do you think maybe you ought to turn in your gun?
That's what happens.
You think I'm making that up?
That's exactly what happens.
A police officer discharges the weapon.
That first thing it happens, a shrink from IA greets him.
You think you liked it?
You think you could really get used to shooting people?
I mean, you haven't discharged your weapon very often, officer.
How do you feel?
Need some time off.
And they they it's a it's an in-depth thing.
I know they do it because they think it's the best procedure uh for identifying, and plus they've got to do it to handle potential lawsuits that might come from Vicks.
Victims, sorry for the lingo.
But this guy, this guy, what is in his 50s, early 60s.
I mean, this is John Wayne.
It was them, this is oh, yeah.
I mean, yeah.
So I was gonna say that.
I think I will say it.
I would I was gonna hold back on saying that, because it would be purposely and thus unnecessarily provocative.
But he was.
He is a man's man.
He's in his office, all hell's breaking loose.
There's a shooter on the loose.
Oh, yeah.
Well, who am I?
I'm sergeant at arms.
So reaches wherever his gun is, grabs it, walks out of his office, finds a guy, pow, problem solved, back to his office.
Reluctant hero, just doing his job.
Man's man.
Didn't call anybody first, didn't consult a policy manual.
Didn't call any insurance company and get the okay.
Yeah, it wasn't a campaign donor stuck in some position.
He was a real guy, and took his job sergeant at arms very seriously.
Anyway, got to take a timeout here, my friends, but you sit tight, we'll be right back.
No, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
Ladies and gentlemen, I just checked the email during the break.
It's becoming predictable.
I love it, but it's becoming predictable.
Rush, you're falling for the media trick.
What do you think the media trick is?
The media.
Right, right.
I'm just I'm being distracted by focusing on what's happening in Canada, which doesn't affect us at all, and I should be talking about the election.
And I should be talking, and my friends, I don't get distracted, and I don't leave anything on the table.
And in fact, I got a whole stack dealing with the election.
Mark Begage, Senator Democrat from Alaska, has just called Obama irrelevant.
I'm the first guy to call Bill Clinton irrelevant.
1993, and he went on TV.
I'm not irrelevant.
The president is still relevant.
But now Beggie says, yeah, two years to go, he's irrelevant.
He's not irrelevant, folks.
Not by a long shot.
He may be irrelevant as far as these Democrats are concerned getting re-elected, but he is not irrelevant.
And I it'd be a mistake for anybody, particularly on our side to uh to think so.
But all that's coming up.
We don't get distracted.
We know how these people work.
We're not being taken off the game.
Don't panic.
It's a three hour program.
Here is uh Mike in St. Catherine, Canada.
We're glad to have you on the program, Mike.
Welcome to it.
Hello.
Thank you.
And make it ditto from us up here in Canada for all you say, Russia.
You're the only broadcaster I've heard of yet that has had the lead that has actually named this person uh a Muslim convert, which he was, and the press up here, just like down there, is doing everything in its power to avoid bringing that to light.
And it's just frustrating.
Are you kidding?
Wait a minute now.
When are you kidding me?
You've got all kinds of media up there, and you're telling me this program, my program is the first one you have heard the shooter referenced as a as a as a convert to Islam.
Let's go a step further, Rush.
When it first came out to his identity, and that surfaced a couple of times, there were some media outlets that were even trying to say, well, quit trying to tie this at uh you know together at this time.
This is not something that's that's uh relevant at this time, even though they've known this thesis.
He was on the Cesus watch list.
I mean, some of the things that have gone on, and it has cost unfortunately this Nathan Sorillo, he was the uh soldier who was killed at the Cenotaph, and the only reason they were out there guarding was because there some of these free thinking liberals ha have had some converts or maybe occupy people.
They were out there because this place is being urinated on in the past couple of weeks.
They're out there with guns with no live ammunition.
This guy comes up, shoots them, then heads into the uh parliamentary buildings, which are right a stone's throw away, and thank heavens for Kevin Vickers, who the sergeant at arms was at that day, went to his office, unlocked the gun, and took this guy out because he was steps away and doors away from getting into caucus.
Okay, well, hold on.
Let me I need to ask you a question based on something I think I just heard you say.
You said the guards were unarmed.
The ones at the Cenotaph, yes.
Right at the Cenotaph.
And you you said that there have been vandals at the Cenotaph recently, which it's Yes, this this has not come out much in Canadian press, but it was very lowly reported, and I heard from somebody in Ottawa today that there have been some urination problems at the Cenotaph, which was one of the reasons these guys were it was uh it's uh Okay, that's one of the reasons why they're there, but is there any any indication that that has a role to play in why the shooter chose this target?
No, I don't think so.
I think uh all along he was headed for the parliamentary buildings, but that's on the walk towards it, and they were there, and they're and what I don't understand is the complacency.
I said to Mr. Snurley, uh Canada has to has gotten a kick in its complacent butt today because just last week two soldiers were run down by another Muslim convert in Quebec.
I don't know if you heard the story, uh, but he drove into a bunch of soldiers killing one of them and injuring a couple of others.
And so they've been on high alert one in uniform.
Accident, right?
There wasn't anything to that.
Yeah, yeah, it was accident when he drove deliberately into a group of soldiers.
Well, something obviously went wrong with the steering mechanism.
But I'm telling you, I mean, you talk about and and then even today, except for Stephen Harper, thank God for him too, because if one of these other opponents of ours, like this Mulkare or Justin Trudeau, that would be your your Democrats or even worse socialists ever were in charge, we'd be hearing all kinds of excuses.
At least at least the Prime Minister stood up and called it what it was an act of.
Don't you wish you had uh uh Kretchen back.
Anyway, uh, I wish we could have had Reagan up here.
That would have helped.
This is this is fascinating.
Your media, even now, is not referring to the shooter as a Muslim convert.
Well, you're hearing it dribble out in small space, but again, just as you made the point, they're not connecting it to any group.
This is just an individual with problems.
And here's the here's the hypocrisy of the left rush.
They call me a uh conservative Canadian, you know, there are some of us up here, by the way, and we do love your show, but they call us mind numbed robots, you and your family of listeners, because we listen to your marching orders, this that and the other thing, and all you have to do is say your snap, and we do.
Yet they won't believe that these individuals can be coerced by their own.
No, that's that's the classic hypocrisy.
The class But that just shows you they're animus for us.
Gotta go.
The Atlantic magazine has a story that says the shooting in Canada can be blamed on uh lack of gun control up there.
Like night follows day.
I can tell you, I did predict it.
Gun control, lack of it, the problem.
That's why it happened in Canada yesterday.
▲
Export Selection