All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 22, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:14
October 22, 2014, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, I didn't see that.
But see, this is my point.
Now that there's a story at something called watchdog.org.
And the story is Cook County ballot box tries to cast Republican votes for Democrats.
It's been discovered.
Now that's Cook County.
Everybody expects that.
My point is that kind of stuff is happening all over the country.
I'm convinced of it.
Now in the past, I have downplayed these charges of voter fraud, not downplayed their existence, but I've downplayed the factor.
The fact that's a big factor, because it would seem to be, it would have to be so massive to explain all these Democrat victories.
But I'm I'm beginning to have second thoughts about this.
The more I see it happening, the more it's uncovered.
And then you apply common sense to the Democrat Party and individual Democrats are not loved and adored like you are told to believe.
Gamby Washerman Schultz.
Respected, loved, and adored, admired.
Give me a break.
We know that's not true.
Hillary Clinton, ditto.
Kay Hagen, North Carolina, Al Franken, these people are not loved and adored.
Hillary can't sell any books.
Andrew Cuomo can't sell any books.
And they don't have any audience on their cable news shows.
They're not these rock star, popular, admirable figures that people run around emulating and wish they were like.
It's not that way.
There's more of a uh branding issue that the Republican Party has, I think, than anything positive the Democrats are exuding.
If it were the case, they'd never lose anything.
If it were so true that the Democrats were universally loved, adored, respected, and popular, we wouldn't be looking at polling data like that that we're seeing today.
And why am I mentioning this?
Because I'm trying to keep everybody's uh mood up.
I I don't there's no reason to get defeatist.
I mean, it's it's frustrating because to me this stuff is overcomable.
It's it's it's beatable.
And the frustration is that we just don't have a Republican Party that seems to know how, in some cases, not even interested.
But some of the stuff doesn't make any sense.
Some of these people that win elections, some of these people leading the doesn't make any sense.
You can't tell me that that people in North Carolina think Kay Hagen is anything great stuff.
I mean, this a woman didn't even show up at her debate last night.
And she didn't show up at her debate because she didn't want to be forced to answer embarrassing questions.
She flip-flopped on on uh air flights from Ebola countries.
She's she's her family got stimulus money, used it personally.
That story's come out in the last couple of weeks.
So she just doesn't show up.
It was an empty chair.
And she tweeted her answers the next day.
That's not the stuff.
That's not.
I mean, you might have some of these underwear clad blog posters in their basements on the Democrat Party thinking it's cool and hip.
But I'm telling you, the majority of the country doesn't say, wow, Kay Hague, that's really that's really smart.
You know, that's really naturally clever to not go to your debate and then tweet the answers later.
Yeah, that's what we want in our leaders.
Yeah, right.
That's not the attitude people have about it.
She's an embarrassment.
Frankens an embarrassment.
A lot of them are.
They're just never characterized that way.
Look, I'm repeating myself here, but you get my main drift here.
I I'm I'm really starting to be curious about the degree, the amount of voter fraud taking place out there.
Have you seen, by the way, let me give you another example of something I find really odd.
Have you seen these before and after pictures of the actress Renee Zellweger?
See, this is such a great test because the people on the other side of the glass, oh, yeah, they're more excited about this than anything I've talked about yet.
And this is my point.
Oh, well, Snerdley hasn't, but you should look them up because whatever she's done, Whatever she's done, she has totally altered her appearance.
Okay, fine and dandy.
Her life, she can do with it what she wants.
However, however, she got a facelift, and the Washington Post has devoted five printed pages to it.
They are critical.
Everybody who has seen the results of her facelift is critical of it.
They're going bonkers over it, snarky comments, mean comments.
What did she think she was doing?
Whoa.
Some are sympathetic.
I mean, there's some sympathetic comments in there, of course, because journalists have to balance their stories, yada yada yada.
But I mean, it's not just the Washington Post.
Everywhere you look and the gossip rags, it doesn't matter.
People are saying, what in the hell happened?
What is she doing?
She lost her mind, blah, blah.
But that's not my point.
She can do what she wants.
It's supposedly the Republicans conducting this war on women, right?
And yet, the Washington Post, five pages devoted to what she did with a lot of snark in there.
It's not a bunch of Republicans piling on Renee Zellweger, is my point.
It's it's these Lily White, just clean and pure is the wind driven snow, nice as they can be Democrats that women supposedly trust and love and don't have a problem with.
They're the mean ones.
They are the ones that engage in snark.
And it is thought they never do.
They're always politically correct, and they're always proper, and they're always respectful, and they're all good feminists, whether they're men or women or what have you, and five pages on a facelift that people disapprove of in the Washington Post.
There's a pew poll out.
Says people with liberal views have no sense of humor when it comes to dissent.
They defriend anybody on the other side when they're social networking.
Conservatives center around one or two resources and so forth, but the the pew poll basically says that the left has no sense of humor.
People on the liberals are humorous.
Oh, I've been saying it for the longest, and they own comedy.
See, here's the irony.
All of the late night comics and all the stand-up comics, they're all leftists, and they're all judged to be brilliant humorists, and they're all judged to be just funny and cool and hip, and yet, here comes Pew with a s with a story in a poll showing that liberals are humorless, especially if you disagree with.
They don't have any humor whatsoever.
You can't, you can't make fun of them.
They don't find anything funny about being laughed at or mocked.
They do not understand self-deprecation.
They have not the ability to laugh at themselves.
Everything's too serious.
And they'll drop somebody, they'll de-friend people on a dime.
I mean, they're tightly wound, they're highly strung.
My my again, my point here is that the Democrats in the left are not who we are all told they are.
They're not all sophisticated, they're not all totally politically correct, they're not all proper.
They're not they're not the people that never make a mistake.
They never make gaffes, they never say anything offensive, they never say anything intrusive.
They never say anything that's disrespectful, and that's the image that's been crafted of them.
What they are is mean.
You get right down to it.
They're mean and they have extremism of their own type, and they employ it.
So many myths, so many myths that we are all living under.
And of course, the drive-by media is responsible for this branding, this imaging and these myths, and everybody tends to believe what they see in the media.
Now to the audio sound bites.
Got some good stuff here today, folks.
First on CNN's New Day this morning.
The guest is CNN's own chief national correspondent John King.
And they're talking about the women's vote and the shrinking gender gap.
And they're very, very worried.
They see this AP poll that shows people support Republicans, women, 42 to 40 over Democrats.
They see the gender gap has gone away.
And they thought they owned it.
They thought they had made this so-called Republican war on women stick.
And now it's disappearing, and they know it means disaster, and so they're talking about it on CNN today.
You have to stretch the gender gap as far as they can stretch it.
That is the key.
Get women to vote.
Hope that men don't vote because they're discouraged.
If you have a huge gender gap in these races, Democrats have a chance.
If it shrinks and polls again show the focus on security issues, the gender gap come back toward Republicans a little bit.
That's the big battleground in the last 13 days.
It's always boggled my mind that with all the things that wives can get men to do, voting all of a sudden, they have absolutely no control.
You always hear the wives lament that, oh, I won't even talk to them about politics.
That was Chris Cuomo there, by the way.
Now, I is there a little uh sexism in there?
Chris Cuomo lamenting why can't wives tell their husbands to vote Democrat, wives tell their husbands everything else to do.
Why don't they tell them to vote Democrat?
And this, of course, is the objective.
I don't have an opinion about anything host of CNN's new day, Andrew Como.
So they're worried about this vanishing gender gap.
Yeah, John King says if it shrinks, and the polls show the focus on security issues, the gender gap comes back toward Republicans.
That's gonna be the big battleground.
Yeah, that and the black vote, and the Democrats are on the short end of the stick on both of them, at least according to polling data.
But Chris Cuomo, it always boggles my mind when all these things wives can get men to do.
Why can't they get them to vote Democrat?
What is his impression of most marriages?
That the women run the show, that the women are telling their husbands what to do, when to do it, how to do it, what not to do, when not to do it, and what's going to happen if they do do it.
Is that what he means?
Women run relationships.
Except when it comes to voting, and for some reason they don't care, and they let their stupid husbands do whatever they want instead of getting their minds right.
This is a liberal.
This is a guy who's supposed to understand this is sexist talk.
You're not supposed to look at women and men this way.
They're all the same.
Women telling men what to do, men telling women what to doesn't happen, but men and women they're not different.
So given they brought this up, let's go back.
Let's go back to Monday morning on MSNBC and Morning Joe and talking about the recent polls that show that Democrats are struggling with women.
In the upcoming election, the co-host Mika Bzhinski says to Tina Brown, what do you think's behind these numbers?
The Democrats losing women, Tina.
Particularly for women, I don't think he makes them feel safe.
They're feeling unsafe.
Uh, they feel unsafe economically, are they feeling unsafe with regard to ISIS?
They're feeling unsafe about Ebola.
What they feel unsafe about is the government response to different crises, and I think that they're beginning to feel a bit that Obama's like that guy in the corner office who's too cool for school, calls a meeting, says this has to change, doesn't put anything in place to make sure it does change, then it goes wrong, and he's blaming everybody.
Well, that's an indictment on Obama is making women feel unsafe about everything, and he doesn't take any accountability for anything.
He's always blaming somebody else.
It just is really a gosh, is Obama is really a failure last night on Hannity.
Sarah Palin showed up.
She had a comment about this.
Question, what's your reaction to what Tina Brown said?
Oh, ironic, because that little lady Tina Brown, she is such a big part of the problem.
She, with her and her ilk being so uber uppity and so cock sure of their um untouchable elitism, they uh who support liberal men who have kept women, unfortunately, um, kind of embracing this lie that they should be dependent upon government.
So Tina Brown, chick, you're a day late and a dollar short.
They've been beating the crap out of strong, common sense, smart conservative women for years, she and her ilk.
So, well, again, day late and a dollar short, Tina.
Yeah, well, that's a good point.
What she's saying is, what is this women feel unsafe because of a president?
Women can take charge of their lives.
I thought that's what women were supposed to do.
I thought feminism was about not depending on a man or a relationship or anything else.
Feminism was about counting on yourself.
Feminism was about setting and churning your own course.
Feminism was about doing what you want to do when you want to do it, how you want to do it, and nobody can stop you.
Feminism is not about how the first black president makes you feel unsafe.
What's that?
And Palin's point is we've got a lot of really strong, tough, independent, brilliant, conservative Republican women, and they're dumped on all the time by people like Tina Brown as traitors to the feminist cause, or worse.
But it is a good question.
What kind of women are these that run around feeling unsafe because of Barack Obama?
Now, I mean as she meant it.
A lot of us feel threatened by Obama and his policies.
Obamacare, the economy, I mean, his he's he's put a lot of obstacles in people's way here.
But that's not what she's talking about.
She's talking about unsafe in the sense of security.
Government is supposed to make women feel safe and secure.
And and because government will provide all the safety and security in the economic needs, and therefore women can can live lives free of disgusting men, insulting predators and so forth.
But Obama's letting them down.
And so these women are exposed.
These women are naked out there in the world and they're vulnerable, and anything bad could happen, and they feel unsafe because of Obama.
It just doesn't sound like the construct of feminism I always thought they believed in.
I don't know, folks, time is going too fast.
I have to take another brief time out, but don't go anywhere.
And greetings, my friends.
Welcome back, Rush Linboy and the excellence in broadcasting there.
Great to have you here.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882 and the email address, uh, L Rushbow at EIP net.com.
Senate Democrat officials start lashing out at the white.
In fact, grab soundbite number six.
This did not make news yesterday, but Barack Hussein oh, the president of the United States, uh, in another soundbite called from the Al Sharpton show, admitted that voter ID laws do not stop black people from voting.
Now that just undercuts one of the primary premises of the Democrat Party.
Oh no, we can't have voter ID laws when that's racist.
That's that's stacking the decks against black people.
You get a voter ID laws.
Black people are not gonna get voter IDs because they know that they're just gonna be identified so the state can handle them.
You can't do that.
That's that's discrimination.
Or whatever else they say it is.
Obama goes on the radio, yes, no, no, no, voter ID, not that big a deal.
Here's what he said.
Keep in mind that most of these laws are not preventing the overwhelming majority of folks who don't vote from voting.
Most people do have an IP.
Most people do have a driver's license.
Most people can get to the polls.
The bottom line is if less than half of our folks vote, these laws aren't preventing the other half from not voting.
Wait, just a minute.
You realize people at the upper levels of the Democrat Party, that'd be blabbermouth schultzes of the world hear this and scratch their heads, say, what is he doing To us.
Their whole premise in opposing voter ID laws is that it will prevent minorities from voting.
The logic is absurd.
There isn't any logic to it, but that doesn't matter.
That's what they claim.
You have to have an ID for anything else.
The idea that you have to show one to vote.
It's just absurd.
And the logic has always been this intimidates African Americans because of our heritage.
Because of the history, the way blacks have been treated in this country, demanding that they show an ID.
Uh-uh, non-starter.
It will, it will harm turnout.
And here's Obama saying, no, won't.
Not sure I understand what he's doing here.
But I'm look the real reason that Democrats don't want voter ID law is so they can cheat.
I mean, it's no more complicated than that.
He's right.
Everybody has an ID anyway.
Most people have a driver's license.
Most people have some kind of an ID, a cash check, use a credit card, what have you.
He says this is not stopping our people from voting.
So he's trying to get voter, he's he doesn't want them relying on excuses.
He's trying to gin up voter turnout here.
And he says, don't fall back on his voter ID.
This is an excuse.
It's not a reason to keep you from voting.
But it is very limiting if your objective is voter fraud.
And we will be back.
Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Did you know it in this last sound bite I played of Barack Hussein Oh?
When he's talking to Sharpton, he says, now keep in mind that most of these laws are not preventing the overwhelming majority of folks who don't vote from voting.
Voter ID law is not why they aren't voting.
Do you realize what a huge rug he's just pulled out from under the Democrat Party?
Now, I know it's not going to have any lifespan.
Nobody's going to react to it.
The Democrats are not going to change it.
But for people who pay attention, the president has just undermined a very serious Democrat Party platform plank, anti-voter ID.
He's just said it doesn't matter.
And to people that did hear this, who can make TV commercials out of it, it's going to matter down the road.
And the reason, the reason that the Democrats don't want voter ID is because that makes it really hard to cheat.
That's the sole reason.
That's why they focus on states.
That's states that don't have voter ID, they're in there trying to prevent it from ever happening.
And after they prevent it, then they're in there and they're doing everything they can to gum up the works.
They're doing everything they can to get away with voter fraud, taking advantage of the fact that people to vote don't have to show a photo ID.
And Obama has just said, that's not why our people aren't vote.
But that's my point.
Our people.
He said, most people do have an ID.
Most people do have a driver's license.
Most people can get to the polls.
The bottom line is if less than half of our folks vote.
He's talking to Al Sharpton.
He's talking about black people.
Can you imagine George W. Bush?
In talking about the white vote said our folks.
Can you imagine if any Republican did it?
Can you imagine what the reaction would be?
But here's Barack who say no.
And he's talking about, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Less than half of our folks vote.
Those laws aren't preventing the other half from not voting.
No big deal, Ho Hummer.
In fact, we totally understand it because they're so discriminated against, and it's they have a champion in the way.
Let's accept that they don't.
Things have gotten worse for them in the past six years than anybody else as a group.
Their unemployment rate is higher.
Their economic circumstances are worse.
Their net wealth, net worth is lower, their their uh the the income gap, black Americans is higher.
I mean, there hasn't been any noticeable improvement.
And most things have gotten worse the way things are measured.
It doesn't matter.
In the real world, I'm just explaining it to you.
Now, let's move back up to the top of the page.
Gloria Allred was on CNN today on New Day, and the Philly and co-host, the former Fox Info Babe, Alison Camarata, who moved over to CNN not long ago.
She's speaking with Gloria Allred about Monica Lewinsky.
She's talking to Gloria Allred about Lewinsky's new cause, using her example.
What happened to her as a as a as a way now to end cyberbullying?
But again, she wasn't bullied.
Matt Drudge didn't make her do anything.
Matt Drudge didn't come along until after Lewinsky had done something.
Or everything.
But that doesn't matter either.
They're going to call it cyberbullying.
And cyberbullying in this case is defined as exposing the immorality of Democrats.
That is cyberbullying.
See, Democrats are supposed to be able to get away with these things.
Democrats are supposed to be untouched.
You're not supposed to report Democrats doing this kind of stuff.
And if you do, you are engaging in cyberbullying, and you are the problem.
Not the people who are committing these various acts that people end up finding about.
So Alison Camarada says to Gloria Allred, won't her story help other people who have felt public humiliation or shame?
Will it help her?
It definitely is a legitimate issue to talk about cyberbullying, and she received a lot of criticism.
But a lot of Republicans are quite aware that Hillary may very well wage a battle for the nomination in the upcoming presidential primary, and they would like to bring back the whole affair with Monica and President Clinton.
And that of course brings Hillary right back into it.
But they may regret what they wish for, because in fact a lot of people may feel a lot more sympathy for Hillary.
The wife who had to put up with this affair and also was humiliated by it.
And so it may end up helping Hillary.
You mean like it has up till now?
Okay, so Gloria's okay, bring it on.
Bring it on.
You Republicans, go ahead.
Hillary runs, bring up Lewinsky.
Bring it all up.
It's only going to make Hillary look vulnerable.
It's only going to make Hillary seem sympathetic, and that I don't know is possible.
Do you think that anybody could make Hillary Clinton look vulnerable?
Do you do you think anybody can make Hillary Clinton become a sympathetic figure?
Do you?
Really, uh Hillary became a sympathetic figure.
You think she was sympathetic then?
You did?
You felt bad for her?
You felt bad for her when she's blaming the right wing conspiracy for this.
Somebody on my staff admits to me they were feeling sorry for Hillary when she's on the Today Show, blaming the right wing conspiracy for what her husband did.
And the right wing conspiracy back then was me.
Fox News was just starting in 1997.
They were just starting to scram the right wing conspiracy was me, and I was the Miss Diller Big.
Anyway, I I disagree.
I don't think Hillary ever comes off as vulnerable, and I don't think she comes off as sympathetic because none of this was news.
The fact that Clinton steps out on her time and time and time again was already widely known.
However, I mean, after all, look at Hillary is seen as invincible.
I have to remind people.
She puts her pants on one leg at a time, like all the other guys do.
I'm the one that has to put this in perspective for people.
She's looked at as superhuman.
I mean, people on our side don't think she's vulnerable.
People in our scared to death of her.
No, don't smirk at me.
I could I could take you to any number of places in New York City, and I could run it.
I just have you meet this person, meet that person, and they're petrified that she's going to get the nomination because they're petrified she's going to win.
They're petrified, she's so all powerful she can't lose.
We get people on our side who are literally quaking in fear over the fact that she is going to get the nomination because they don't think she's beatable.
Well, fine and dandy.
I'm just saying somebody like that's not seen as sympathetic.
Somebody like that is not seen as vulnerable.
And well, see, that's that's the how long we're gonna feel sorry for Hillary.
She's already forgiven the lug, right?
That was the big stroll to the helicopter from the White House with Chelsea and Hillary and Bill.
I mean, how many times are we gonna be feeling sorry?
How many times are we gonna be uh go through this?
Well, anyway, then uh then all red and camarada have this exchange after this last sound bite we just played for Monica was a victim.
She wasn't sexually harassed because what happened was welcome, and therefore it wasn't sexual harassment.
So then why is she a victim if she wasn't launched in the city?
Surely well, because even though she disclosed it uh quite a bit to her friend who then disclosed it to the world, I mean she took a lot of heat over it.
Okay, so Gloria Alrid, you heard right, says that Clinton didn't harass Monica because Monica wanted it, and Monica loved it.
And so there can't be any harassment.
Now, I thought this also goes against every tenet of sexual harassment.
I thought I I don't, I I thought yes never meant yes, and no always means no.
And she asked for it.
That's exactly right.
Monica she wasn't sexually harassed because of what happened was welcome.
It wasn't sexual.
And so Cameron, well, then why is she a victim?
If she wanted it and she pursued him.
And all red harassment because she says she was in love.
She wanted the relationship, but Clinton, he was mean.
He knew that she loved him, and he made fun of it, and he didn't seriously, and that's the harassment.
The harassment is that Monica was in love and totally devoted, and Clinton just toyed with her affections and was so mean.
And that's why, if there was any harassment, that's what it was.
But Monica wasn't harassed because of what happened, because it was welcome.
She wanted it.
Therefore, it wasn't sexual harassment.
Now, the other end of this spectrum, ladies and gentlemen, is none other than Rosie O'Donnell on the view.
Rosie O'Donnell on the view said that Bill Clinton should have been prosecuted for the Lewinsky affair.
She remarked on this speech that Lewinsky gave.
And she said, Monica, or uh Rosie O'Donnell said, you know, I love Monica.
I love it, but if it was a company like GE, he would have been prosecuted because you're not allowed to have sex with the help.
And Whoopi Goldberg jumped into correct O'Donnell.
He was prosecuted.
He was impeached.
Yeah, but he was prosecuted and peached for lying about all this to a grand jury.
He was not prosecuted over sex.
He was not impeached over sex.
But let's keep it now.
Rosie O'Donnell, just to keep this in perspective.
Rosie O'Donnell's a 9-11 truther.
Rosie O'Donnell thinks 9-11 was an inside job.
Don't forget that.
Rosie O'Donnell also has named Jimmy Carter as her favorite president ever.
When Ben Affleck defended Islam to Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell suggested Ben Affleck should run for president.
Rosie O'Donnell is a glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
ABC is paying her millions of dollars to share her ignorance and wisdom about politics and pop culture with their viewers.
When Rosie O'Donnell, I'm going to tell you ignorance isn't just bliss.
In her case, it's a lottery ticket.
Hey, folks, look at all the damage that Bill Clinton has done to feminism first.
Oral sex is not sex now.
You get a Lewinsky, it isn't sex.
And sexual harassment.
You know what it used to be.
All you had to have for sexual harassment was for a superior in your office to use his power to have his way with you, no matter whether you wanted it or not.
Now that's out the window.
Because we can't, of course, have Bill Clinton said to have engaged in sexual harassment.
No way.
Not gonna happen.
So the original definition of sexual harassment was a superior and usually a man, an evil mean man having his way with an underling, a secretary, an executive assistant at uh some lesser employee, but that's out the window now.
Because we can't have Bill Clinton guilty of it.
Since that's what happened, that's not sexual harassment anymore.
Uh-uh.
At least today.
Here's Lynn in Omaha as we head back to the phones.
Really appreciate your patience.
Hi, Rush.
I'm really glad to talk to you.
Um when I heard that clip of Obama talking about why he's not really worried about voter ID suppressing votes.
Uh I had to call and tell you, I can tell you the reason why.
Um there is a campaign across black churches.
I know in the South, probably across the country, called Early Voting in the Pews.
And what these pastors are doing is although they're telling people in their congregations they, you know, that evil they don't want you to vote, they know they can get around this by having people request absentee ballots.
And they're doing that and telling people in their congregations to bring all your ballots to church on a particular Sunday this month, and you'll vote in the pews and to send those in so you don't have to worry about ID.
You know, now that you mentioned this, I vaguely remember having heard of this, but I didn't I didn't recall anywhere near the detail that you have just provided.
Well, it's still going on, and that and a whole lot of other things of voter fraud are still going on.
But this the pastors are not allowed to do what, did you say?
Well, they're they're telling the congregations that you know they don't want you to vote.
There's that they.
Uh and they know that they can get around the ID thing by having people request that the ballot.
Wait a minute.
The pastors are saying they don't want people to vote.
Yes.
Well, that doesn't matter.
You know it's that they.
They mean white people don't want you to vote.
So bring your gangs.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, the the past saying that white people don't want you to they is Republicans, by the way.
Right.
They don't want you to vote, so the way to get if you don't have it, just bring your ballots, your absentees to church next Sunday will vote.
Exactly.
And we'll turn them in for you.
Well, they I think they leave it to people to either mail them in or turn them in, but the point is they get people to request the ballots and bring them to church, and they all vote as one, and of course they're all voting for Democrats.
Right.
And so this is why we're seeing boxes of mail-in ballots showing up at the polls already.
Well, um possibly.
And in particular, I watched one service online where I saw Michelle Nunn addressing the congregation.
And uh I lived in Georgia for a good while, and I'm really concerned about that race there.
And uh you know, it's she's it's neck and neck now, but you know, if she gets all those black folks in all those churches to vote for her, um i it it's gonna have an impact on that race.
Well, yeah.
Major.
I think the polling data that that that shows the Democrats are really in trouble if they can't turn out the black vote.
Those polls are accurate.
I think they're they're and and there's panic on the Democrat side, which is why they're doing this.
And when they do it in a church, they know that nobody's gonna do it and stop them.
Yeah.
They know that nobody's gonna have a guts.
You might, but who are you?
Well, I might, but who am I?
They know the Republican Party is not gonna make an official move.
Not especially not with Eric Holder up there.
Well, no, and you know, uh d I think about that mayor in Houston, and I wonder how many uh how many black pastors she wants a sermon from, because plenty of them against political sexuality.
That is an entirely different thing.
And uh for the for the I think what that mayor in Houston has done may be one of the most vile, filthy violations of the Constituent violations of the Constitution that I have seen.
And I, for the life of me, cannot figure out why law authorities are not pursuing this.
I cannot understand this at the time.
Haven't even gotten to immigration yet today, and that's huge as well.
There's an all-out assault on the traditions and institutions of this country.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection