All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
30:26
September 30, 2014, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right, 99.7% at a time.
The views expressed by the host on this program, not necessarily those of the staff management nor sponsors of this station, but they probably are.
And if not, soon will be.
It's a delight to have you here, my friends.
Rush Limbo, America's real anchor.
It sounded good, didn't it?
Because it's the truth.
America's real anchor man here behind the golden EIV microphone.
We're in Los Angeles all week at 800-282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Now there are other things going on out there besides Secret Service and ISIS and the intelligence apparatus of the country and the way Obama's dealing with it.
And I want to get into some of those things now, here in our final busy broadcast hour.
And here's a story from the Associated Press, all of a sudden concerned about something.
The headline of the story, Screwels scramble to help teenagers who crossed the border.
And I must warn you, the AP is not even calling them undocumented migrants anymore.
Now they are just unaccompanied minors.
It's in Frankfurt, Delaware.
American scrulls are scrambling to provide services to the large number of children and teenagers who cross the border alone in recent months.
Unaccompanied minors, as I say, no longer undocumented migrants, no longer illegal immigrant children.
Nope, these are unaccompanied minors who made up the summer spike at the border, have moved to communities of all sizes in nearly every state, according to federal data, to live with relatives and await immigration decisions.
To live with relatives.
That's the key to this.
At least they want us to think it's the key.
The Supreme Court has ruled that scrulls have an obligation to educate all students, regardless of their immigration status.
So scrubs have become a safe haven for many of the tens of thousands of these young people, mostly from Central America, living in limbo.
They're not in limbo, they're home free.
That's what's happened here.
They're not in limbo.
What is this limbo business?
They're home free.
The taxpayers are going to be paying through the nose for what is a living in limbo business.
Does anybody really think they're going to be deported or sent back?
My friends, they have been quickly dispatched.
They are now, we've been told, these uh these unaccompanied minors, have now been placed in homes in all fifty states.
By design and on purpose.
They're not in limbo anywhere.
It says here that these uh students, these unaccompanied minors, they're eager, very eager, but they face barriers.
You know what the barriers are?
Some of them can barely read or write in their native language, much less English.
And yet they're in our schools.
They know what this means.
It means time is going to have to be taken to accommodate them who don't even speak their own language or write it well.
These are gifts of love, of course.
This is what we've been told.
Gifts of love to the country.
These kids' parents have willingly given them away to America as gifts, gifts of love.
And they don't need to be able to read or write.
Love doesn't need real words.
Love doesn't mean having to say you're sorry.
Love doesn't mean even having to know how to say you're sorry.
Now the district here in Frankfurt, Delaware, their goal is to get them assimilated and eventually into a regular high school, and there they can earn a diploma, even if that means participating in adult education programs and going to school until they're 21, and may I add all for free.
Likewise, their school meals and their meals at home and their housing and their medical treatment and their transportation and their flat screen TVs.
Eventually their cell phones.
All free.
Donald Hatteer, a scroll board member, said advance warning would have helped with planning, but nobody gave them any.
The federal government, he said, just dropped this on us.
He wonders what's next.
These kids are still coming across the border.
This problem hasn't been solved.
That's right, it hasn't.
They've just stopped reporting on it, but the exodus or the whatever you want to call it, it does, continues because what's really going on is the future of the Democrat Party is wrapped up in this.
These are simply young, unregistered future Democrat voters.
My friends, I have another C I Told You So.
Three C I told you so's in one day.
All three big ones, all three major ones.
I was the first.
Well, I think I was the first.
There might have been somebody that came up with it before I did, not sure.
In explaining the value of Obama as the first African American president, it insulated him from any criticism.
Remember the early days when so many people who voted for Obama thought doing so would show how non-racist the country finally had become, and that we were once again good people, and that so many people had voted for Obama simply because he was African American would demonstrate that this country is no longer a bunch of racist pigs.
And instead, what happened was that Obama's race was used as a giant insulation.
He was immune to criticism.
Any criticism of Obama as the president or his policies was immediately chalked up to racism.
And therefore it was rejected.
And it was said to be illegitimate, unwise, unimportant, because it was unserious.
It was all rooted in race.
And this had one really practical impact.
It shut up the Republican Party.
The Republican Party just went mute.
They didn't want to be called racist.
They didn't want that out there during re-election campaigns, so they shut up.
It worked.
So no criticism of Obama was permitted because none of it was considered valid.
It was all said to be rooted in racism.
You know this as well as I do.
And that now I do know that I was first in forecasting this, because during the salad, remember, right after Obama had been elected, but before he was inaugurated, everybody was thinking that this was one of the most wonderful things that had ever happened.
is now the American people had finally proven they no longer were racist and we had shed the original sin of slavery there.
This one act had done all that.
And here I came, throwing cold water on everything, telling everybody, if you think that, you couldn't be more wrong.
It's going to be just the opposite.
This country, it's not going to take very long, is going to be said to be more racist than ever.
Because here we've got the first African American president, and what's happening?
People are criticizing him.
And what does that mean?
It proves that the country's still racist.
They can't tolerate a black man as president, criticize him left, and that's exactly what happened.
And it was then that I warned everybody that the Democrats maybe had planned this, but if not, certainly had learned from it, that their next nominee would be a woman.
And the same thing.
First female president, no criticism permitted.
Any criticism that's offered is sexist.
And part of the war on women.
And then after the first woman serves, then the Democrats will nominate the first Hispanic and repeat the whole thing.
First Hispanic president, no criticism permitted.
If you criticize, you're a bigot.
From the Tea Party News Network, last week Scotty Hughes made an appearance on Fox News, the O'Baxter Factor, where she warned that the take two in three, two, one.
Last week, Scotty Hughes made an appearance on Fox News, the O'Reilly factor, where she warned that the progressive mafia, in preparation for Hillary 2016, are starting to establish a narrative that asserts women are under attack and that the sexism danger must be confronted.
The sub has uh Scotty's a commentator on Fox, by the way.
Scotty Hughes is a commentator.
And Scottie Hughes is out there saying sexism is going to be the new black, and Hillary is the next protected victim.
Now, congratulations to Scottie Hughes.
She's called it exactly right.
And that's why I'm doing the piece.
This is a T I told you so, because other people are now beginning to see what's in store.
The narrative inevitably continues with any legitimate critique of Hillary.
When she inevitably runs, it's not legitimate because it's sexist based.
Any criticism.
This game was played before, or as Mrs. Hughes eloquently put it, this came right out of the election 2008 playbook.
So the Tea Party News Network is praising one of uh one of its own.
But this you have heard about this for the past two, maybe four years.
This was uh easily spotted.
And as I say, when they get around, if they do succeed nominating Hillary or electing her, then the next after her whatever number of years, eight, sixteen, twenty-four, whatever, then the next nominee be Hispanic and just repeat the same thing.
This is how they're planning on doing it.
And so the Tea Party News Network is running a story warning everybody of this.
But you, my friends, see I told you so on the cutting edge.
From the Daily Caller, written by Neil Monroe.
Do you remember the name Neil Monroe ringabelle?
There was a presidential appearance at the White House one day.
Last couple of years.
And the president made his announcement.
There was supposed to be no questions asked, but Neil Monroe asked the question.
Tisk Tisk, a no-no.
Now, normally, if Sam Donaldson would have done this, and it had been Reagan or Nixon, oh man, what a great journalist.
What a great this guy Donaldson, he doesn't take no for he just bores right in.
Neil Monroe, the journalist chased the guy down to the Washington Monument.
They ran him out of the White House grounds.
They were so mad at him for violating protocol.
There are no questions here, you idiot.
You're not supposed to ask questions.
Don't you understand the president's protected from people like you?
And the press corps just jumped all over Neil Monroe, but he's still out there, still filing stories.
And this one is about an unreleased poll that shows Democrats are deeply split on amnesty.
Now it is widely believed that the Democrat Party is 100% fullbore behind.
Amnesty.
This poll says no.
Many Democrats and swing voters strongly oppose Obama's immigration policies according to previously unreleased information from a poll by the George Washington University Battleground poll.
You can see why this wouldn't be released.
It might undercut the news media's lie that everybody's crying for amnesty, especially for Democrats.
That this one shows there's a big split in the Democrat Party over amnesty.
The August survey of 1,015 likely voters showed that Obama's immigration policy faces lopsided opposition.
57% opposed, 38% approved.
It's worse than that now.
In the I think it's the NBC News Wall Street Journal, might be ABC, Washington Post, whatever to Gallup, Obama's 30% approval on Amnesty, 60% disapproval.
One of the polling firms that sent the Daily Caller data showing how many demographic groups strongly opposed or supported Obama's immigration policies.
The new data showed 114 conservative Democrats split 28% strongly against 23% strongly for.
But the bottom line is not going through all the uh details here, that there's a big gap between support and disapproval of amnesty, even in the Democrat Party.
Now, what does that tell you?
It tells me that an anti-amnesty candidate could attract a lot of Democrat votes.
But it seems like both parties are all in for amnesty, and we know why.
We've talked about it numerous times.
But I just thought it would be interesting to pass on.
Even in the Democrat, even among Democrat voters, there is a wide gap between approval and disapproval for Amnesty.
Speaking of which Obama the the pro-amnesty group that was salivating for Obama to issue his executive order granting amnesty by Labor Day, sorely disappointed.
They were beside themselves, very angry.
Luis Gutierrez, Illinois among them.
So they've been running around crying about it.
And the words come out of the White House, don't want it, don't don't don't sweat it.
It is gonna happen.
Don't panic.
It is gonna happen.
It's gonna happen before the end of the year.
Don't worry about it.
So the regime is continuing to send signals to the pro-amnesty groups that it is gonna happen.
He's just waiting for the right moment.
Now, what is the right moment to do when there's no popular support for it?
When there is no credit to a crew for doing it.
In other words, whoever does this, whoever signs off on amnesty, be it by executive order or legislation, whoever is seen as making it happen is not going to be applauded.
There isn't any credit to be had here is only blame and probably some pain at it at election time.
So under what circumstances would Obama do this if there's no credit to happen?
Now, clearly Obama doesn't care about that.
Obama has a much larger agenda with amnesty, and that is the further transformation of America and anything he can do to take down what have been the traditions and the institutions that have defined greatness.
But what what circumstance would it be if Labor Day wasn't right?
And if uh now there's maybe not even before the election, at what point, since there's not popular support for it, what is the occasion?
What is the impetus for it?
If nobody's gonna get credit for it, if nobody's gonna be applauded for it, or if uh no no majority uh uh support for it exists, then when remain the big questions.
And I have always maintained that since whoever does this is gonna really get shellacked.
I mean, whoever is seen as making this happen is gonna get really ripped.
My view is that Obama is still trying to figure out a way to see to it that the Republicans have fingerprints on it, and if he can do it, see to it that they are the ones who are seen as making it happen.
Quick timeout, my friends, sit tight, much more straight ahead right after we get back.
Welcome back, my friends El Rushbow serving humanity simply by being here.
Here's um here's Renee in Gainesville, Georgia.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Um, I just wanted to share with you what I'm hearing from my teacher friends here in the Gainesville area about unaccompanied minors.
All right.
So we started the school year with about eight in one classroom, and I think we're up to a count of about 100 now.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, just you started with eight in one classroom, and now you've got a hundred spread out over a number of classrooms, is what you mean.
Yes, yes, yes.
So we're up to uh about a hundred in the local school system that are unaccompanied minors.
Um that is concerning enough, but what really concerns me is what some of the teachers that are teaching these students are telling me about the students themselves and what they're being expected to do.
The students are um varying ages, all in one classroom.
And she said, honestly, some of them, you know, they change their age from day to day, so I'm not even really sure you know how old they are.
They could be too old for school for all I know.
And they're, you know, one day they're 16, one day they're 15, one day they're 17, you know.
But the other thing that really concerned me more is that they are not being expected to teach these children in a traditional way that we think of educating people that really they've been told that their goal is to teach these students um survival phrases and just basically hold it.
Slow down slow Renee slow down just a second here.
They're not being expected to teach them in a traditional way that we think of in educating people.
They've been told their goal was to teach these students survival phrases, did you say?
Yes, like surviv basic communication, you know, hi my name is, uh, where is the bathroom?
Um, you know, things like that that are just very basic as opposed to teaching them how to actually read or write or things like that.
Well, how can that happen?
They they don't even from what I just read, some of them can't even read or write their native language.
Exactly, which is I which is what prompted me to call you when I heard you say that, and it makes more sense to me now why they're saying just teach them these survival phrases because these children are coming here at high school age with no foundation education.
Things like don't shoot.
Perhaps, I don't know.
But uh, but but you know, it it's sad that they are coming here without knowing, you know, even the most basic things that we take for granted that that uh uh you know fifth grader would know.
Renee, can you hang on to the break?
I I have a s I have a serious question to ask you about about this when we uh when we come back.
Just a few short minutes, it won't be long, and we will be right back.
Survival phrases.
It's cool.
Now we're back to Renee in Gainesville, Georgia.
My my question to you, Renee, you're still there, right?
Yes, I'm still here.
My my real we've got now, you have eight in a classroom now in this one school in Gainesville, you have a hundred students who are being taught survival phrases, not even being educated the way the other students are.
What's happening to the education of the other kids while all this is going on?
That's my question.
Well, these students, it's my understanding, are in self-contained classrooms.
So they're not being mixed with um the general population of students, even other students that speak Spanish, they're not being it's my understanding they're not being assimilated or mainstreamed as they to use education lingo.
Um that they are being taught separately, and they're um at uh a school location that houses the alternative school and um a special education branch of the school and some things like that.
So they're not at like the high school where all the other kids are.
Well, thank actually, thank goodness for that.
I mean, I I would hate I I'm glad they're being segregated in that in that regard, because this would be a disaster if they were being uh integrated with the rest of the kids here who are trying to learn the traditional subjects, reading, writing, mathematician, mathematics, whatever history, and all of a sudden that stops while the uh undocumented migrants are taught survival phrases.
So at least they're being segregated.
But the schools can't be prepared for this.
They're they're not.
Uh they absolutely are not.
Um and the the teachers are doing the best they can and they're taking classes on teaching English language learners, but it's still it's it's very difficult, um, especially you know, teenagers are a difficult age to teach regardless, even when they speak your language.
Um and so the language barrier in addition to just the normal teenage resistance to authority, um, I can imagine it's not a very fun process on some days.
Now, I'm trying to put myself inside one of these schools, and one day, while things are going normal, and I've got the usual student body in there, and they're all in their various classrooms and they're learning whatever they're learning or they're trying to.
Then all of a sudden, you've got maybe two or three, the next day, four or five, the next day, seven of these kids that have crossed the border illegally, who don't speak English, who can't read or write their own language, basically can't communicate with them.
How do they even show up?
I mean, who's taking them to school?
They don't know where the school is.
Who's bringing them?
What is the expectation when they show up?
Who is telling the school what they have to do with these kids?
Those are all very good questions that I don't really know the answer to.
Well, there has to be some kind of system or policy in place because otherwise the people that run these schools would be pulling their hair out.
Now what do we do here?
So they have to find a classroom to put these people in by themselves because they they they're learning curve is an entirely different process.
And there's nobody there that speaks their language, or very few.
I know the the initial teacher who um are there pictures of Obama in this classroom where these kids are pictures of Obama and Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, and and is there like a voter registration form in there?
All with Halo's, of course.
All with Halo.
You're good.
You're Renee, you got a great sense of humor.
Look, I'm I'm glad you called.
I I appreciate it.
I've I'm trying to imagine what that would be like.
You're you're a principal, vice principal, a teacher, and everything's going along as it always does.
And then one day, here's a new arrival, a four or five, whatever number, and it just keeps growing.
And uh I'm surprised to even have room.
We keep hearing about how uh how overcrowded schools are.
Anyway, Renee, thank you again.
I appreciate it.
This is uh this is Vicky in Shawano, Wisconsin.
Hello, and welcome to the program.
Hey, hi, Rush.
It is such a pleasure to talk to you.
Such an honor.
Um just a quick comment.
My husband and I used to live in Honolulu, and we would stay up in the early morning just to watch your TV show, because we loved Coco the Gorilla, and we loved when he did sign line.
Was that not funny?
I couldn't when we had to do in the West Maui Mountains.
I just couldn't contain myself laughing myself silly when we had Coco the Gorilla.
Great.
We loved it.
Thank you so much for all of the things.
Thank you.
Coco is now running uh Rushlimbaugh.com, by the way.
Oh, great, great.
You took them out of the um the Forest Preserve to give them a real job.
Thank you.
Uh uh.
But um my question and comment, well, it's you had was talking earlier about the Tem the Democrats wanting to run someone who's gonna be the first woman president, the first later on the first Hispanic.
Well, what I think the Republicans should do in 2016 is to run, and I I run Susanna Martinez.
I would be so contrast to Hillary, it would be a contrast in character, competency, and charisma.
And you need to win Ohio, so you run Rob Portman as his her vice president.
It would be a winning thing.
I mean, they that would squash the Democrats' uh uh.
Well, you know what would happen.
Look, I I I I appreciate your thinking on this, and I I know why you're thinking.
Let me say what would happen.
If l let's say it's uh it's uh Julia Castro, uh who the Democrats nominate.
Now let's stick with Hillary.
Let's just stick with it.
Hillary's gonna be the Democrat nominee 2016, and they got this grandiose plan that she's gonna be elected and therefore first female president can't be criticized.
Republicans decide, okay, we'll fight fire with fire.
Here's Susanna Martinez, governor of New Mexico will put her up there.
She's not only Hispanic, she's female as well.
What the media would say is she's not legitimate Hispanic, just like Clarence Thomas is not a legitimate African American.
She's not legitimate Hispanic, and they would question how she could possibly be a real woman being in the Republican Party since they're conducting a war on women, and they would attack her.
They would attack her as unreal and illegitimate and not down for the struggle for women and and and traitors and all that and that's how they would do it.
I'm not saying they would succeed, but that's what their reaction it would not quiet the critics, is my point.
But she's a tough cookie.
She can I think she could take it better than she's got more, you know what, than a lot of the men.
It it doesn't.
I I know she is.
If she's a Republican female Hispanic, she's the enemy.
And they're gonna take her, they're not gonna reward her toughness.
They're gonna say it's phony.
They're gonna call her a traitor.
They're gonna do all kinds of They'll do everything they can to discredit her with the people they're trying to convince to vote for Hillary because she's the real woman, if you can believe that.
I want to take a stab at answering my own question that I asked mere moments ago.
Okay, so Obama originally said that he was going to grant executive amnesty by Labor Day.
Then Labor Day came and went and nothing.
And then they said, well, it's going to happen before election day.
And then they said, no, it's not going to happen.
It's going to happen after election day, but before Thanksgiving.
They keep putting it off.
And again, the reason is whoever is seen as responsible is not going to get applauded.
It's not supported.
And they keep moving it back.
Now the latest is from the Obama camp.
These are people that are being told by sources close to Obama.
Democrats that want this, media people that want it, they're being told by people close to Obama it will happen before the end of the year.
All right.
What is going on might make the end of the year relevant.
I think that it's all going to be gauged by what happens to Mary Landrew.
There is a high likelihood, ladies and gentlemen, that Mary Landrew's Senate race in Louisiana is going to go to a runoff in December.
Not guaranteed, obviously, but some of the smart thinking suggests that she's going to find herself in a runoff.
So they had to come off of the Thanksgiving target.
Thanksgiving after the election.
They had to come off of it.
They have to, they can't do this before the Senate is decided because it's going to destroy any Democrat who is incumbent or otherwise seeking the Senate.
Well, it's going to hamper.
It's going to be a big obstacle.
So I think, because they knew it's going to be poison.
They know that there is no credit that's going to be given for this.
If they announce that they're going to do amnesty before her runoff, and they're going to wait.
If she needs, if she finds herself in a runoff, you wait.
They're not going to announce amnesty until after that runoff election, because she will lose otherwise.
If they do amnesty and they need Landry to keep the Senate.
The Kansas City Royals are in the American League playoffs for the first time in 29 years.
Ladies and gentlemen, I used to work there, as you well know.
I called them.
I offered to come back one time only to arrange a ceremonial first pitch and the national anthem singer.
And they told me, thanks.
We've got it handled.
But I just want to get it all.
I offered.
It was magic back in those days.
Anyway, thanks for being with us, my friends.
As always, it's great fun, and we'll be back 21 hours tomorrow.
Do it all over again.
▲
Export Selection