All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 19, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:41
September 19, 2014, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program have captivated a nation for twenty six years.
And they will keep doing so.
It's Friday, folks, and here we go.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
And here's the telephone number, 800-282-288-2.
If you want to appear on the EIB network.
What makes Friday different from the other days of the week?
We don't screen as tightly.
Monday through Thursday, you have to talk about something that I'm interested in, because I don't want to be bored.
If I am, everybody else will be.
Friday, throw that out.
Take a great risk.
Whatever you want to talk about is fine and dandy.
It's a great opportunity for you, actually.
If you have a point you think nobody's made, or if there's something you think isn't being discussed that needs to be.
Now I want to I want to build up on Todd from Toledo, our last caller.
He uh he said that sports writers today are not writing like men.
Uh and he's comparing it to sports writers of days gone by.
His basic point was that he believes that the sports media is as cowed as anybody else by political correctness and fear, and they've got to write a certain way to keep their jobs and so forth.
And I just want to stress again that that is not the case.
There's a very good analogy to explain the sports media today.
And I've said this in in numerous ways in an attempt to have my opinion understood, because that's what I mean, a primo communicator here, and I keep sticking to it till I'm convinced people understand what I'm what I'm trying to say.
What we're looking at here is the sports media flexing its muscles.
The sports media is attempting to demonstrate its power to change things, to move people, uh, both people in a particular business, the NFL in this case, and public opinion.
The sports drive bys are trying to do to the National Football League what the news drive-bys did to Nixon.
They are trying to demonstrate their power.
They are trying to show that they can change the game and the attitudes that accompany the game, both by players, coaches, owners, and fans.
The same way they think they changed the presidency and politics in general.
Watergate for a journalist, sports entertainment, food, you name Watergate is the seminal moment.
Before that it was Vietnam.
Watergate, they took down a president.
They think it's not me asserting it.
They believe it.
Woodward and Bernstein gods.
60 minutes, a close second.
What did 60 minutes do?
Destroyed people that they thought needed to be destroyed.
I mean, that's the ultimate demonstration of power.
And so they are doing everything they can to demonstrate their power to change the game.
And their desire to change the game is real.
It's it's rooted in what they truly believe.
The way they've been educated, the way they've been raised, and the way they've been taught in journalism school specifically.
Watergate, profound change on politics in the presidency, uh, since Watergate, Republicans have been presumed guilty on everything.
Since Watergate.
And that's what they're tempting.
Now, to get news today from an NBC News Marist poll that the public is yawning.
The public doesn't care.
The public knows full well what's going on with all this, but it's not affecting their love for the game.
It's not affecting their stated uh desire to watch games and so forth.
All the ratings for last night's Thursday night game were not good.
But it was also a blowout.
It was a it was an uncompetitive blowout.
But again, the pregame show last night, it took about 45 minutes to get to football.
The rest of the time was on this domestic violence stuff, including interviewing coaches and players about it.
So there's no there's no question what's going on here.
But on the other side of it, and this is only going to steal them even more.
I mean the media is only going to motivate them any more.
We know by polling the NFL is supported by the public.
And it's the politicians and the media who are despised by the people for all the polls that the media shows you about the disgust people have with Congress and the president, whatever.
They are also.
They rank journalism very, very low on the integrity scale.
For example, Roger Goodell's ratings as commissioner of the NFL are higher than Obama's as president.
NFL popularity, six times higher than Congress.
The media, despised, distrusted, suspected by nearly everybody.
Doesn't mean they don't have influence.
But there's a constant quest to prove it.
That's all I'm saying.
There's nothing uh fake or faux.
F-A-U-X about it.
Two different national figures have weighed in on our pop culture and politics and sports leagues.
One of them, the president of the United States.
This at the White House today, Obama hosted an event to launch the It's On Us campaign.
You know what that is?
The It's on Us campaign.
Well, it's a it's a new public awareness and action campaign designed to prevent sexual assault at colleges and universities and to change the culture on our camp eye and to better engage men in this effort.
So within a week of this subject blowing up in the NFL, the White House has an instantaneous plan.
The It's on Us campaign to straighten this up.
It's on us to engage men and to get them to shape up.
It's on us to design programs to prevent sexual abuse at colleges and universities.
Here is a portion of what President Obama said.
Today we're taking a step and joining with people across the country to change our culture and help prevent sexual assault from happening.
Because that's where prevention uh that's what prevention's gonna require.
We've got to have a fundamental shift in our culture.
As far as we've come.
The fact is that from sports leagues to pop culture to politics, our society still does not sufficiently value women.
We still don't condemn sexual assault as loudly as we should.
We make excuses.
We look the other way.
How can he say that?
With this orgy of of blame that that is is going on here, the the the amount of conversation taking place, the attention focused on sexual abuse against women just in the NFL.
And he says, the fact is our society still does not sufficiently value women.
We still don't condemn sexual assault as loudly as in what world is the man living?
That's all that happens in the NFL media today, is the condemnation of sexual assault.
I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna rewrite this or reread this.
And I I think I've got something, and it's gonna sound partisan to you, but I believe it.
I wouldn't say it if I didn't.
Here's how I should have said it.
As far as we've come, the fact is that from sports leagues to pop culture to politics, our society still does not sufficiently value conservatives and Republicans.
You want to talk about a group that is constantly picked on and attacked and lied about from the IRS to Hollywood to movies to books to newspapers, you name it.
American conservatives are routinely lied about, impugned, destroyed lives and reputations.
It's a daily quest.
We still don't condemn sexual assault as loudly as we should.
We make excuses.
We looked at who's making who is making excuses for sexual assault?
Can somebody give me a name?
Did Barclay say something I don't know about?
Okay, well, who who no, I'm just kidding.
Who who who is making excuses for it?
Another straw man example, exactly right.
We make excuses.
We look who is making excuses of looking the other way.
And not to be left out, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Also in Washington today.
Democrat National Committee leadership forum.
We have two sound bites.
We have fought for families, for moms and dads and kids and the values that hold us all together.
So don't let anyone dismiss what you're doing here today as women's work.
Don't let anyone send you back to the sidelines.
We're here, proud Democratic women, and proud democratic men to stand up not just for ourselves, not just for women, but for all our people, for our families, our communities, and our country.
Okay, now obviously Democrats are all in on the war on women.
But what the heck is the rest of that?
Well, I know it's blather, and you could be saying, what did she say?
Let's let's we have fought for families for moms and dads and kids and the values of the whole What did they be they they do nothing but break apart families?
Democrat Party policies destroy the family unit.
They replace the father with a welfare check.
This isn't even arguable.
We have fought for families for moms and dads.
Why?
You mean families and moms and dads are hopeless going through life unless a Democrat party's out fighting for them, doing what?
Protecting them from those evil Koch brothers.
That's what?
And from those evil conservatives on the radio.
That's another.
We're here, proud Democrat men and women stand up, not just for ourselves, not just for women, for all of our people, for our family.
Standing up for what what who's under siege here?
You guys have the power.
You guys are in the White House.
You guys have the Senate.
You guys own the meet.
Who who is under siege here?
What are you standing up and protect?
See, this is limbaugh theorem being adopted by Hillary.
She's been in power in one way or another since the mid-90s.
And it's as though she's had nothing.
She's an instant bystander.
She's a spectator.
She's way over there in the sideline.
She's looking at what's going on.
She's outraged by it, and it's time we all got involved to fix it.
Except she's been intimately involved in every decision that's gone wrong for the past 20 years.
Here's the next bite.
Look at violence against women.
Twenty years ago this week, my husband signed the Violence Against Women Act.
It was a great victory, thanks to years of hard work from leaders like Vice President Biden.
But celebration of this anniversary was tempered by troubling news on many fronts.
From the outrages of the NFL to more assaults against women in uniform and at college.
War on women.
They're not going to abandon it.
They're gonna ride it for all that it's worth.
I mean seriously.
To brag about her husband's record on women's rights?
Ha!
Ha ha.
Your guiding light, your bulwark.
Your rock solid foundation, Rush Limbaugh, the Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies and back to the phones open line Friday.
This is oh, look at this.
We have a ten-year-old from Grand Rapids named uh Leah.
Leah High, great to have you on the program.
Hi.
How are you?
Good.
Well, that's great.
That's that's just great.
It's so great to have you.
I'm excited you're here.
I was wondering if you were going to write another book.
I am.
You are?
I can tell you with with no hesitation whatsoever.
I can fill you with total complete confidence.
Yes, I am.
You you mean a rush revere Uh time travel adventure series book?
Yeah.
Yep, that's exactly right.
I am going to write another one.
Yay!
Oh, you like them?
Mm-hmm.
And let me guess your favorite character probably is Liberty the Talking Horse.
Nope.
Really?
Who is your favorite character?
Mr. Revere.
Mr. Revere.
Now, now, now, now you, you are one smart little girl.
So have you read, Leah, have you read both books that are out now?
Yeah, I've read them at least three times.
Really?
Man, you must really like them.
Yep.
Well, this is making my day.
You don't know, because you are right there.
You are right at the target age that these books are written for.
Because it's so important that people your age learn the truth of just how wonderful the founding of this country was and how great it was and how special it was.
And I'm really glad that you have you taken the time to really read the three times, that's great.
Do you have do you have the um uh you probably don't have the audio versions, I'd like to send those to you.
That's me reading both books.
It's a different, unique way of enjoying it.
Would that be okay with you?
Yeah.
All right, cool.
And and you know what?
We'll throw If you and if you hang in there and be tough, if you can be patient, uh, if if you'll give Mr. Snerdley your address, if your parents will give us permission, we'll I'll say I'll send you some some new stuff when it's ready.
Like I could send you a we have a great little thing called Ted T. Bear, colonial dressed uh bear that you would you would just love, and some other things too.
Okay.
So if you hang on, Leah, Mr. Snerdley, the nice man who answered the phone will get your address and we'll get the stuff out to you as soon as we have it ready.
All right.
Okay, thankfully, very much.
Appreciate.
Now, don't hang up.
Okay, Mr. Snerd will be right there too.
There's something in the stack.
Let me here it is.
I was I have to admit I was I was surprised by this, but I I really was.
It is a story in the Washington Post, Wednesdays, you know, two days ago is Constitution Day, the 227th anniversary of the signing of the Constitution.
Do you know that only 36% of Americans can actually name the three branches of government the Constitution created?
36%, folks.
This is according to a new survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center.
And it is, I don't know, sad, disappointing.
I don't know.
Maybe some of you aren't surprised.
I mean, I know that there's a lot of overall ignorance, not stupidity.
There's an a lot of overall ignorance about the structure of government.
And I know that there's all kinds of ignorance about politics itself.
But only 30.
What are these people being taught?
You know, people say, why are you rushed?
Why did you really want to take all this time to write children's books about American history?
This is it.
This is one of the many answers.
We have a we have a top-tier Democrat union run public school system, right?
The Democrats and the unions have been in charge of the public school system for who knows how many years.
36% of Americans can name the three branches of government.
And by the way, that's basic.
That doesn't even require opinion.
They can't even name legislative, executive, judicial.
They probably say Congress, Senate, and President.
I'm guessing.
I don't know what they say, but that's what I would bet they're in it.
What are the three branches?
If they don't admit that they don't know, or if they do admit they don't know, that's it.
If they don't admit it and they guess, whoa, oh President, Congress, and the House.
Or President Congress and the Senate.
How much how much money are we spending on education?
You know, Barack Obama's endorsed union controlled schools, and Obama knows everything, right?
When when it comes to our schools, Obama and Muchell, they not only know everything, they know best from what's taught to what people should eat.
We spend billions of dollars on our schools.
What can you possibly add to the best school system to best educated children in the world?
Well, never mind.
Thirty-six percent.
That is among the many reasons I decided to write children's history books.
And we're back.
Rush Limboy here on the cutting edge, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Back to the phones of Houston.
This is uh Gus.
Welcome, Gus.
It's great to have you here.
Hi.
I want to bring you back to 1984, one of the classic football games.
It's the Orange Bowl, the national championship with the Miami Hurricanes against the Nebraska Corn Huskers.
The Cornhuskers are underdogs, and it looks like they're going to get blown out.
It goes up 17 to nothing fairly quickly.
The Huskers cannot throw the ball.
They've tried and tried, they can't throw it.
It's third down.
The Huskers have the ball.
They've got 17 yards to go for a touchdown, and everybody knows this is a running play.
The announcers call it, everybody watches it happen.
The ball's hiked, the quarterback hands it off to the running back or appears to hand it off.
Everybody runs right.
Both teams are running right.
In the meantime, what nobody saw was the quarterback intentionally fumbled that when the ball was hyped, so the ball is sitting on the ground.
Both teams are running to the right.
One of the bruising linemen picks it up from Nebraska, runs left all the way in for a touchdown.
That was the birth of one of the greatest plays, the old fumble rooskey.
I don't know if you remember the fumble roosky rush, but let me tell you, I think our president is in the middle of pulling a fumble rooskey on us.
He had the immigration law bill in his hand, ready to shove down our throats, but now it's sitting on the ground.
He intentionally threw it down, and while everybody's looking right at the midterm elections, at the beheading by ISIS, that ball is sitting there, and I can assure you, either himself or one of his henchmen is about to pick that up and run it in, and we're going to have one of the worst immigration liabilities we've ever had.
Down in Houston, our schools are overcrowded right now because we cannot we don't have the space for the illegal immigrants that we have to, or the illegal aliens that we have to house in school here.
It is going to be an unbelievable problem, and we're doing nothing about it.
All right, now I had not remembered the fumble rusky.
I know of the the Bummeruski.
Uh a play popularized by the late Oilers coach Bum Phillips.
But the Fumble Ruski, I have a vague memory of what you're talking about.
Right.
Wait, hang on, just a question about the game.
That was the first touchdown Nebraska scored.
They come back and win the game.
No, they came back and it was one of the greatest games ever.
They lose 52 to 50 by missing the last second two-point conversion.
They don't score it, so the game doesn't get tied.
Right.
And it was all because they couldn't throw the ball.
They had to run it and even had to fake a run right in order to score a touchdown on a fumble.
And nobody saw it, Russ.
That ball sitting there, the announcers didn't see it.
They're all calling a run to the right, and that lineman picks it up, just runs to the left.
He's one of the few guys.
Yeah, that's like it's it's it's it's a great trick, boys.
Like the Dolphins ran against the Chargers in uh Miami 1980 playoffs, the uh the hook and lateral.
Yeah.
But anyway, let me hear you go back to your main thrust here.
That Obama is doing a fumble roosky while everybody's distracted.
All of a sudden, out of the blue in the next week, day, whatever, he's gonna do executive amnesty.
My only point in arguing with you on this, and I'm not really arguing, I'm I'm uh playing devil's advocate.
He doesn't have to do any trickery.
He can do this whenever he wants, up front or not, because the end result when he does it, however he does it, is gonna be the same.
There is going to be outrage.
If he does it now, if he does it after the election, whenever he does it, I'm not gonna matters how.
I don't think anybody's expecting it right now.
They're all waiting for the midterm election.
But there's nothing we can do to stop him anyway if he wants.
If he's gonna do it, he's gonna do it.
We can't just because we know he's gonna do it next Tuesday doesn't mean we can gear up and stop him from doing it next Tuesday.
I may not be as smart as the next guy, but I gotta believe there's something we can put in place to block this.
The cost to the citizens down in Houston alone.
My kids are in school down here, and their classes are overcrowded specifically because we have so many of the illegal kids that are in these in these schools.
We don't have housing for them.
We're bringing trucks, uh trailer trucks so the kids can go to school.
It's a it's a travesty.
Well, I don't all of that is true.
I'm just I'm just looking here at the practical realities.
You've got amnesty that he wants to do and said so and had everybody thinking he was going to do it before Labor Day or around Labor Day.
Democrats are all he didn't do it, question why.
I think why is because he couldn't finagle it with Republican fingerprints on it.
He knows look at his numbers on immigration.
30 percent approved, 60 percent disapproved.
There is no credit to accrue to him whenever he does it.
Not that he cares about that, but if he can arrange for Republican blame, there nobody's gonna get any credit.
The American people don't want this.
So if he sneaks it in, my point is the impact is the same.
The outrage is the same, whether he does it in front of our eyes or does it as the result of fakery, the end result is still the same.
Executive order amnesty.
There's nothing stopping him.
My point, Gus, there's nothing stopping him now but himself.
I hate to think we're gonna sit back and watch this one go through, but uh, you may be you very well may be right, Rush.
Uh well, I now wait.
I'm not predicting one way or the other, except to say I never th and I I'm on record, I didn't think he was gonna do this before the election.
It's going to it it's gonna cause damage.
Obama may not be on the ballot, but he he has a number of ways I can go.
I don't think he, even though he doesn't care so much about Democrats, I don't think he wants something that could result in permanent damage to the Democrat Party.
But I also think, on the other hand, that he wouldn't mind having a Republican-controlled Senate with a Republican-controlled House, because that way he can just blame everything that doesn't get done on the Republicans and set everybody up for the Democrats sweeping in 2016.
But then on the other side of that, Gus, if he doesn't have a Democrat Senate, he doesn't get to put any more judges on the Supreme Court.
And believe me, that is a big deal.
And he can't do that with a Republican Senate.
He needs a Democrats holding the Senate, because they're probably gonna be a vacancy or two, at least one.
And he he wants that.
He wants as much as he wants amnesty.
On the plus side rush, maybe our government's investing in some of this Alibaba stock and we'll have the cash to take care of all this.
Yeah, right.
Gus, I love the way you're thinking.
And my only disagreement is, and I could be wrong, we'll let other people weigh in.
I I just I don't think he needs to fake anybody out.
Because there's nothing stopping him now.
If you're by definition, if he's gonna do this by executive order, he doesn't need public support.
He doesn't need votes in Congress, he doesn't need anything.
By definition, he is violating the Constitution.
So whenever he does it, and however he does it, uh the only way that I can see him trying something like you suggest is if he really wanted to roll the dice and make it look like it happened and he had nothing to do with it.
But how the how can he do that when it's gonna happen by virtue of executive action?
So I don't disagree with your thinking that we're always head faked.
They always attract our attention to something while other things are going on while nobody's looking, the old magician's trick.
Don't doubt that at all.
It's just in this case, I don't know why he would need trickery.
Because he doesn't need support.
He doesn't have any and he's not going to get it.
And in fact, it was the Democrats, supposedly, who leaned on him and begged him not to do this before the election.
Because it would hurt them too much.
We will um we will see.
But I love your analogy.
We'll be right back, folks.
Only one thing argues against my previously expressed theory, and it is this.
Republicans never stop Democrat judicial nominees anyway.
So it could well be that Obama won't care if he has a Republican or Democrat Senate.
Now, on paper, you would think he wouldn't want Republicans because they would theoretically stop and uh object to his judicial nominees.
But the Republicans, they're agreeing with it, but to show how cooperative they can be.
Oh, yes.
So the filibuster was wiped out by Harry Reid, it'll be put back just in time for the Republicans not to be able to do it.
Look, let me tell you where we are with the Republicans.
I had a guy who was chatting back and forth with a friend last night.
He says, You seem remarkably calm.
I said, I am.
It's all about expectations.
I finally figured out the Republican Party's what it is, and it isn't any going to change it.
And every day being invested in the hope they're going to change is a waste of time and energy.
I said, let me give you an example.
And then my friend said, well, let me just tell you something.
If one of these ISIS guys gets in through the southern border and sets off some kind of bomb in LA, that's the end.
That's the end of the Democrat Party.
And I said, see, no, that's where you're looking at this the wrong way.
If some ISIS guy gets into the country through the southern border and drops a bomb, sets off a bomb in LA, it's the Republicans who will get blamed for not working with Obama on comprehensive immigration reform that could have kept the ISIS guy out.
The Republicans are going to get blamed for everything.
And because they're going to get blamed for everything, they're going to keep cooperating with the Democrats in hopes that they will stop being blamed.
That's the reality of the day, folks.
Call it battered wife syndrome.
Call it PTSD, call it outright fear of the media or what have you.
But the Republicans simply look at John Boehner.
Just voted for the continuing resolution that funds Obamacare.
All right?
And at the same time said that comprehensive immigration reform is got to happen.
It's the only thing that the uh can help the American people.
Well.
So I I have ceased.
It's not the way to put it.
The question that drew all these answers out of me was how how do you go up and go to work every day?
Aren't you just totally frustrated?
I said, I used to be.
But I have finally come to grips with the reality that's out there, and I can't change it.
He says, so well, what is what is your hope?
I said, I'll tell you what my hope is.
And what I'm gonna do is what I've always done.
I'm gonna show up here every day and tell the truth about what I see and think.
And I'm gonna have my audience in mind, and that's where my focus is gonna be.
I'm I'm I'm not here to change the behavior or the votes of the Republican Party.
That's not it has never been the purpose here.
And it's it was never even designed.
It's never even one of the structured designs of this program.
It's always been audience focused and related.
Um I believe that if if there is a turnaround that's gonna happen here, I just don't think the Republican Party's gonna lead it.
I think they'll follow whatever happens to reverse things in this country.
And I think, and this is gonna sound Pollyannish, and it's gonna get a lot of objections from a lot of people, is simplistic.
But and I can't explain why why.
I've just always had a tremendous faith in a majority of people in this country to get it right and do eventually get fed up and to eventually do something or that some event will happen.
I I I I've mentioned this many times before.
I can't be more specific.
It's just an it's a it's a gut level instinct I've got.
It's not a false hope.
It's not a dream.
It's a real substantive feeling that I have.
And I'm confident that all of this rot gut that is happening to our country at some point is going to be stopped and beat back.
And maybe this is a big one, maybe a serious reversal will take place, but that it's going to be over time.
I don't know if it's going to be generational.
Young people growing up and refusing to accept the idea that America's best economic days are behind them.
I wouldn't.
If I were becoming 2530 today and was told that, I'd say, screw you, and I'd set out trying to prove everybody wrong.
I just I don't I don't think young people are going to sit there and accept this talk from leaders that uh uh American economy get used to it.
This is the new normal.
It appears that they are now, but give them time to get frustrated and so I just I think human nature is going to take over at some point.
Look, I I know it's sounding Pollyanish here.
I know I sound like a Miss America pageant contestant, uh male lesbian.
I can't get any more specific.
It's not a dream.
I'm not trying to be falsely optimistic.
And I'm not saying that taking action isn't necessary.
It is.
There has to be active pushback.
Well, we do that here, with the American people.
The Republican Party isn't, though.
All I'm telling you is I it didn't take long to set in, expecting the current Republican Party to all of a sudden behave differently than they have been for six years.
That doesn't make any sense.
Hoping for that, waiting for that, trying to influence that, that's what doesn't make sense to me.
The die is cast.
No, I was not joking.
If an ISIS guy, I'm telling I know how this works.
For crying out loud.
When a kid shoots up a school in Denver and ABC goes to the roster of a local Tea Party to see if the name is on it, what do you think's gonna happen if an ISIS guy blows up LA?
The Republicans are gonna get blamed for it.
Whether they deserve it or not is not the point.
Everything's politics.
It's gonna happen.
And it's made to order.
Republicans refuse to cooperate with our brilliant, brave president in a comprehensive immigration reform plan that could have kept that guy out.
Never mind that.
That's just totally BS.
And not one syllable of truth in it.
Doesn't matter.
The low information people will be told that.
If you can convince enough people that the Republican Party actually hates women, well, then you can convince them of anything.
If you can convince a sizable number of people in America that the Republican Party actually doesn't want women to have sex, then what can you not convince them of?
If you can actually convince convince a decent number of people that the Republican Party is conducting a war on women that is rooted in Republicans not wanting them to have access to birth control pills, then what the hell?
It's the same old Democrat trick.
They create all this dependency in people and then accuse the Republicans of wanting to take it away.
Social security for the elderly, cell phones for welfare recipients, food stamps, you name it.
That's all they have to do.
And if if that's all you've got, if government welfare is all you've got to live on, and somebody comes along that you've been voting for and telling you that the other guys want to take it away from you don't have a chance.
You don't, you're not gonna take the risk and investigate to find out you're being lied to.
You're just not gonna vote for the Republican.
Now it's up to them to find out a retort of this.
I've we're all exhausted telling them what to do.
there are ways around this message, but it's core principle belief message ways that they don't, they're not interested.
They want their committee chairmanships.
They want their consultants to get paid off.
And they want to keep close ties to the Chamber of Commerce, and they want their retirements paid for, by the way.
And here we are in the midst of the fastest three hours in media.
Ladies and gentlemen, only one big exciting lickety split broadcast hour to go.
And then about four hours of frustration.
▲
Export Selection