All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 18, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
September 18, 2014, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh here on the cutting edge of societal evolution, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882.
The email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
So I checked the email again.
And I can guarantee what's going to happen.
When I quote an email asking me, why aren't you doing X?
Then the why aren't you doing Y crowd shows up.
And the next crowd, why aren't you spending more time talking about what Obama's doing in Syria with ISIS and ISIL?
I'll tell you why.
Because I don't think he even cares what he's doing.
This is an absolute joke.
John Kerry gets up there and says absolutely inane things.
He was taken to town by Bob Corker yesterday, sent Pelosi shuddering away in tears.
We got the sound bites coming up.
Kerry doesn't know what he's talking about.
Hegel doesn't know what he's talking about.
The generals know what they're talking about, and they're actively being ignored.
This isn't about beating ISIS is why.
This is all because Obama's poll numbers are falling.
And I'm not going to get roped in to talking about this the way the soap opera writers demand that it be talked about.
Can this revive the Obama presidency?
Screw that.
That's what this is not about.
We're sending 3,000 troops to fight Ebola.
We won't send 3,000 troops to protect our border.
We won't send 3,000 troops.
We won't admit that that's what we're doing to stop terrorists that want to wipe us out.
We're going to send the Iraqi army and the Syrian army who are supposedly somehow going to become loyal.
What the hell is.
It's stupid, folks.
It is.
And the generals know it's stupid, but they can't come out and say they're getting as close to trying to tell everybody how literally wacko this is without actually saying it because they can't be insubordinate.
But for crying out loud, Barack Obama, commander-in-chief, that's scary.
John Kerry has already demonstrated that he is clueless.
Chuck Hagel, ditto.
We knew that back when he was a proud Republican.
But the whole motivation behind this is once again to improve Obama's chops in the polls.
That's why we're doing this.
Three weeks ago, didn't have a strategy.
Three weeks ago, they were the JV team.
Now we've done a 180.
And when there's something relevant, really important about this talk about, you can count, I'm going to be right there, but I'm not going to get roped in to talking about this in identically the same way you see it on cable news or standard news, wherever you see it, because it's all being talked about in the same way.
Same questions are being asked with the same people about the same people.
The same analysts are coming up with the same opinions about this or that.
Nobody will tell you that this is an absolute embarrassment.
And that the only reason this policy is being undertaken is because of the November elections.
That is also, by the way, why there is so much focus right now in the National Football League.
It's about the war on women and reviving that as a tool of defeating the Republican Party in November by turning out the female vote.
So let's talk about the NFL, the latest developments here.
A couple of things first.
Claire McCaskill, classic, classic liberal Democrat politician.
Moisten the finger, put it in the wind, see which way the wind's blowing, and then get behind it.
And then start pandering and meandering all over the place without making any sense whatsoever.
Claire McCaskill Says that sports leaders put victory over decency.
Sports leaders put victory over decency.
You know, the same thing can be said about the Democrat Party, Senator McCaskill.
The Democrat Party puts victory over decency.
Let's conduct a poll, Senator McCaskill, and let's ask the American people which is the sicker culture, Washington, D.C., or the American professional sports leagues.
The Democrat Party or the NFL.
Where really is there strikingly noticeable corruption, Senator McCaskill?
Might it be in the Democrat Party with all the voter fraud and all the extra-constitutional attempts by the president to break the law on amnesty and whatever the hell else and Obamacare?
You want to talk about victory over decency?
How about the whole war on women thing that you people have created?
An out and out lie.
There is no Republican war on women.
Republican women, Republicans, period, are not against sex.
They're not against women having sex lives.
It's absolutely absurd what they're trying to get away with here.
The entire Democrat Party agenda is sick.
It's made up of baseless, false, character assassination, character-destroying accusations about their opponents.
The Democrat agenda long ago stopped being about the good things you're going to do for the country because there aren't any.
Six years of evidence has accrued about what the Democrat Party agenda does to this country.
Okay, so let's divert everybody's attention and let's start focusing on the National Football League, where, yeah, all this stuff going on is not good, but the incidence of sexual abuse, spouse abuse, all of these criminal acts in the NFL is 13% what it is in the general population.
And yet, the Democrat Party and the sports drive-bys are doing everything they can to make you think that the worst examples of all of these social diseases exist in the National Football League.
They don't.
They exist in far greater numbers in the general population, but that doesn't matter because there's an election coming up here.
We were repeatedly lied to about Obamacare, Senator McCaskill.
We were lied to about shovel-ready jobs with the first stimulus.
We were lied to about Fast and Furious.
We were lied to about Benghazi.
We were lied to about the IRS.
And the IRS was targeted against us, Senator McCaskill, conservatives.
We've been lied to repeatedly about the economy and jobs.
We have been lied to about doctors supposedly amputating limbs on patients just to get the money when it doesn't happen.
We've been lied to about every damn thing that matters by this administration and the Democrat Party.
You want to conduct a war on women?
The champion of women in this country in the Democrat Party is Bill Clinton and Teddy Kennedy.
And you want to talk to us about the war on women.
You celebrate sexual abusers.
You celebrate and put them at the top of your ladder of prestige, sexual adulterers.
And you preach to us about the war on women?
All we do is respect them and try to understand them.
And I say that affectionately.
It's one of life's great pursuits.
It is.
I can't say that anymore.
That's sexist and bigoted because it implies that women can't be figured out.
Well, okay.
Maybe Jay Carney's figured him out.
I'll ask him.
Maybe Jay Carney can explain women to me.
Maybe Bill Clinton can do it.
Whoever their heroes are.
We are $17 trillion in debt.
The Constitution is threatened every day by the Democrat Party.
And Claire McCaskill wants to go out and try to convince you that the culture of sports is what's tearing the country apart.
Sorry, it may not be a pretty sight, but the culture of sports is not what's tearing this country apart.
We've seen the facts about criminal behavior in the NFL compared with the rest of society.
The NFL fares far better.
The culture of sports is competition.
The culture of sports is meritocracy.
Best team wins.
The culture of sports is becoming the best you can be.
The Democrat Party doesn't stand for that anywhere except in electoral politics.
Democrat Party wants to beat up on the NFL.
The NFL is about hard work.
The NFL is all about diversity.
The NFL is about definitive results.
You win or you lose.
The NFL isn't any affirmative action.
Well, there wasn't.
The NFL is about people pursuing their dreams, trying to be the best they can be at a job not everybody can do.
They're all being tarred and feathered now by the people like Claire McCaskill, who want to come along and tell us that sports leaders put victory over decency.
Please.
You could just as easily be talking about the Democrat Party.
Victory over decency.
Gloria Allred.
This takes the cake.
There was a story on ESPN.
ESPN did a profile of the Chicago Bear wide receiver Brandon Marshall.
In 2006 or 2007, I believe it was.
Brandon Marshall, bipolar, he's had some, I don't want to say mental issues, but I don't know the proper term mental will suffice for now, but he had them dealt with.
He went and got help, therapy, a number of things.
But in his past, 2006, 2007, was a case of spousal abuse.
So ESPN has got their show behind the lines, on side the lines, down the line.
I don't know what it's called.
They did a profile of Brandon Marshall.
And they went back and they said it must be fair and it must be thorough.
So of course they had to go back and touch on this.
Brandon Marshall says, you know what?
They're lying about me.
I should have never agreed.
They're telling lies.
Brandon, what was your first clue?
It's the media.
It's a profile.
What do you think?
They're going to fawn all over you?
At any rate, the woman who was the victim of his abuse in 2006 or 2007.
Well, actually, I don't think the woman has.
Gloria Allred popped up in Atlanta and is now demanding that Goodell resign, citing the league's failures in dealing with domestic violence and citing a particular case which dates back more than five years.
She was in an Atlanta news conference.
She said resignation makes sense, talking about Goodell.
I think he should resign because of the way investigations have been conducted in the past.
On Wednesday, Gloria Allred recalled the allegations of Rashida Watley against Brandon Marshall in 2006 and 2007.
At the time, Marshall lived in Atlanta with Rashida Watley.
Now, the police reportedly responded to numerous calls by Watley alleging abuse by Marshall.
But Marshall was never convicted of any crime.
Charges were dropped in one instance.
Marshall was acquitted in the other.
In 2012, Watley's civil suit against Brandon Marshall was dismissed.
And here comes ESPN reliving all of this as though it's current.
Marshall was given a three-game suspension August 2008 for violating the NFL's personal conduct policy following an arrest related to an alleged incident with Rashida Watley, but that suspension ultimately was reduced to one game.
So on Wednesday, after a whole lot of nothing, Allred sat at a table flanked by the self-described best friend of Rashida Watley on one side and Rashida Watley's father, Clarence, on the other side.
The friend, Christina Spivey, recounted incidents of abuse suffered by Rashida Watley.
Clarence Watley said that the NFL and Marshall's team at the time, the Broncos, were made aware of the incidents and said they would follow up, but that they never did.
Rashida Watley didn't show up at her own press conference yesterday.
It was Gloria Allred, Rashida Watley's best friend, Rashida Watley's father.
Allred said she has no plans to sue the NFL, but she wants the league to change its procedures for investigating claims of domestic violence.
So Gloria Allred has a news conference about a woman who didn't show up and is all fit to be tied now, demanding that Goodell resign.
Let's go to the audio sound rides.
I want to take you back because it's all starting to pan out now.
And I don't mind.
I don't mind showing you how when I told you what I predicted was going to happen, it is beginning to happen.
This August 6th, two years ago, 2012, talking about my theories, predictions on how the NFL would be targeted by people that wanted to go after it.
If you'll just stop and think about it, you'll know I'm right when I tell you that everything is politics to the left.
Everything.
There's not one thing in our culture or lives that they do not politicize.
Now, where would this country be?
Stick with me here for a second, folks.
Where would this country be without contact sports?
Where would we be without, say, the Second Amendment?
Motorcycles.
Pick anything.
What really is going on, this is not exclusively about football.
It's not self-contained, and it's not unique.
It isn't just about football.
Football's just the latest iteration of what the left is trying to do.
In New York, it's being done with trans fats.
It's 16-ounce sodas.
And before that, it was done with smoking and cigarettes, tobacco, and all that.
I said yesterday that the defining characteristic of liberalism is force.
They use bullying, brute force to get what they want.
They don't mess with the arena of ideas and debate and trying to win the hearts and minds of a majority of Americans because they know they never will.
They are not a majority way of thinking.
So they only have one way.
They brute force, they intimidate, and they literally get people to give up and cow down and give the left what it wants for some peace, some security, some silence until they get agitated about the next thing, and then they're off and running.
If it's not 16-ounce sodas, it's trans fats.
It's global warming, then it becomes tobacco and cigarettes and then Joe Camille.
And then all of a sudden, that's become the NFL.
And it's the name of the Redskins.
Now it's Goodell, now it's sexual abuse.
Ferguson, Missouri.
Now we got to make sure that cop gets convicted or there's going to be race riots.
That's been promised in Ferguson, Missouri, by the way.
So here's Greg Easterbrook.
Actually, I got to take a break because I got more than one Easterbrook sound button.
I can't squeeze them all in here in this particular segment.
But proof, validation, my most recent contentions coming up.
Don't go away.
By the way, those of you on the hold, your phone calls are coming up in the next segment.
Promise.
Greg Easterbrook is a good writer.
He's wrong on global warming and climate change.
He's a great writer.
He has a great column on ESPN every Tuesday called TMQ, Tuesday Morning Quarterback.
Last night he's on the news hour on PBS.
And he's got a new book, The King of Sports: Football's Impact on America.
First question: Greg, what's the threshold that has to be crossed where there are serious financial consequences to all of this upheaval in the NFL?
If people begin to say that football is the new cigarettes, and you're starting to hear that, if football becomes perceived as a woman's issue, nobody saw that coming.
And especially if football, stop the tape, take it back to the top.
What do you mean nobody saw that coming?
This is my exact point.
I did see it coming.
And when everybody was calling me crazy for warning about it, that's how long I have been.
You just heard the soundbite I played two years ago comparing it to the way they went after tobacco.
Woman's issue?
Nobody saw that coming.
Here's the whole bite now.
If people begin to say that football is the new cigarettes, and you're starting to hear that.
If football becomes perceived as a woman's issue, nobody saw that coming.
And especially if football, people turn their attention to the fact that the vast majority of football is played at the youth and high school level by people who legally are children.
That's where the health harm of football is done.
If public high schools begin to drop out of playing football, and there's some indication they will, that over a period of years could change the NFL's economics very radically.
And then he added a new angle to all of this, and that is class warfare.
It's the perfect game for the United States.
I call it the king of sports because it expresses what we are as a nation.
It's too loud.
It's too crazy.
It's too violent.
It's the perfect game.
And it's a fascinating game to watch.
I love it.
But when you add the sociological impact, the distorting effect that it has on high school education, the fact that NCAA football has a big public university's, and then add in that the public subsidizes the production of NFL profit, roughly a billion dollars a year goes to subsidize the construction and operation of NFL stadiums, where almost all the revenue generated is kept by the super rich.
You have these sociological impacts, and suddenly the fact that the game is a fabulous game doesn't seem so great anymore.
Yes, and they say nobody saw this coming.
But perfect game, perfect game for the U.S. loud, crazy, violent, perfect game.
Actually, he's got a point there.
And I also think that there's a factor in that that has made it a target of the left.
That it is, in fact, too American for many of the people on the left.
And we go back to the phones.
We got Jennifer here from Middleton, Idaho.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Jennifer, hello.
Hello.
Thank you for taking my call.
I'm shaking.
I'm so excited.
Great to have you here.
Thank you.
I wanted to bring up a point that I don't think I've heard anywhere, and it's horrible.
I mean, men should not hit their wives in most, you know, but the women are staying with them.
In the case that you were just talking about, she was with them for two plus years, and you never left.
I'm thinking after the first time my husband hits me, totally out of there.
You're talking about Rashida Whatley staying with Brandon Marshall.
Exactly.
It happened more than once.
Jennifer, I think it's rather common.
It's been a phenomenon people talk about forever in terms of trying to understand it.
Meredith Vieira the other day owned up to the fact that she hung around a really abusive relationship before she married the guy she's currently married to.
She stayed in a relationship for years with a guy that choked her, threw her up against the wall.
It got worse and worse.
He'd promise every time he'd be the last time he wouldn't do it again.
She wrote or explained why she stayed in the relationship.
And a lot of it is guilt.
A lot of it is self-blame.
A lot of it is fear of what else is out there if you abandon that relationship.
Relationships are important to a lot of people.
I mean, the fear of losing one and finding another is so great that you hang in.
In the case of we had a woman call after the NFL upped its suspension to six games for spouse abuse, and a woman call said this, and they're not going to report it.
The women that marry these guys, in large part, marry them for the money.
And if the guys are prevented from earning money because they get suspended, the women aren't going to admit it.
They're just going to sit there and take it and so forth.
And it's going to be counterproductive.
Now, you say that you would leave the first time it happened, but most.
Absolutely.
I'm sure you mean it, but a lot of women don't, even though they mean it too.
It's a phenomenon.
Well, I don't think they, I think you lose your right to have to complain about it then.
If you're not going to do anything about it, you have no right to complain about it.
You either be part of the solution or part of the problem.
Okay, now we have just had something provocative stated here on the EIB network and not by me.
Sorry.
No.
Congratulations.
So just to be clear, if a woman is in an abusive relationship and stays in it, then you aren't interested in what she says about it after that.
No, not unless she's going to be part of the solution.
So yesterday, I think it was you were talking about changing, they want to focus on changing men's behavior.
Well, I think maybe they should look at this or look at themselves in the mirror and focus on changing their behavior as well.
Oh, no, no, no.
We never ever, and we never will hear about reprogramming the way we raise girls.
Oh, it drives me insane.
I have a girl and a boy, and it just drives me insane.
Which, by the way, she's looking forward to your next book that's overdue.
So that's all I've got.
Well, you tell her that she's got a lot to look forward to.
Let me just put it that way.
I know, I'm excited.
But I just wanted to bring up that point, and people just look.
It just, I'm sorry, it drives me insane.
So it's interesting.
Thanks for calling.
I want to repeat this because it reminds me of something.
I was talking to Mr. Snergly about this before the program.
And not the specific point she just made.
It is kind of interesting.
Okay, look, if you're in an abusive relationship and you don't leave, then you are part of the problem, and continuing to whine and complain about it should fall on deaf ears.
That was her point.
But it's a fat chance.
I mean, this is never, I don't care what.
This is one of those things where the fault is never going to be transferred.
But I was, I was something related to this.
How many times, ladies and gentlemen, when there has been domestic civil unrest in a town or a city, let's say, riots, or After a team wins the championship, the town goes nuts and starts burning buildings and cars and so forth.
Or political reasons, there's rage.
Or a book comes out on how to assassinate George W. Bush.
How many times are we told that we are not to judge that?
That we instead are to take time and understand the rage.
How many times have you heard that over the course of your life in the midst of any kind of outbreak of civil unrest and violence?
Hey, wait, don't be too quick to condemn.
You must understand why they are mad.
You must take time to understand the rage.
The left is famous for that, folks, because most of the behavior we're talking about is committed by leftists, so it can't be condemned.
It must be understood.
Because you see, in trying to understand the reasons for the rage, we then get closer to accepting the premise that the rage and whatever resulted from it was valid.
Okay, so here we come to spousal abuse in America.
Whatever happened to can you imagine if somebody says, hey, wait a minute, we should take some time to understand the rage here.
I'm just trying to point out leftist hypocrisy is practically in everything that occurs here.
I mean, these are the people, they're the ones that run anti-bullying campaigns when in fact they are the bullies in the political realm.
They really are what they accuse us of doing.
They really do what they accuse us of doing in many ways.
I think this battered wife syndrome, I think it extends to political parties.
I actually think the Republican Party is suffering from it.
The Republican Party is the equivalent of a battered wife.
They don't get out.
They continue to take the abuse.
They get beat up all the time.
The media beats them up left.
Look at what they did to Mitt Romney.
Mitt Romney, a classic example of battered wife, just incessant lies, distortion.
It was brutal what was done to Romney.
The lies that were told about Romney and the way he treats his wife and kids and his animals, his pets on the roof of the family sedan on vacation or what have you, all didn't pay his taxes.
I think the Republicans exhibit classic battered wife traits.
Too scared to do anything about it.
They've got post-traumatic stress disorder because they know the media is going to come calling and rip them to shreds.
It's a phenomenon that actually encompasses a wide swathe of our society.
Here's Debbie in Texarkana, Texas.
You're next.
I'm glad you waited.
Great to have you here.
Hey, Rush.
I'm a number one promoter defender of Rush since 1988.
I got two concerns about us sending our military to Africa.
One of them is, of course, you recently heard that another doctor has gotten this disease, and you know they're totally covered and protected over there and they're still getting it.
Right.
And number two, I'm worried that humanitarian military types, I don't know what their process is, but I'm worried about that could be a setup for an ISIS to use as an opportunity to attack our troops.
Yeah, you know, I haven't.
You may be a little bit more up to speed on this than I.
I have not, other than the fact we're going to send 3,000 troops to fight Ebola, I haven't dug too deeply.
I don't know.
What are they going to do?
I'm not sure if it's just a perimeter type thing or what they're planning on doing, but I'm not sure if I can do it.
Well, I know you cannot shoot a virus.
You can't imprison and you can't torture a virus like the American military did with George Bush.
You remember that?
Obama told us.
So we're going to set 3,000 people, a corral, a disease, and we're going to use the Iraqi army to fight genuine terrorists that want to wipe it.
I don't understand what the military is going to do.
I don't either, and I'm wondering if they're even going to be armed.
Well, I would think so.
They're the military.
Well, they're not armed on our own bases.
Well, that's true, but they're going to be deployed in foreign environments.
Well, hasn't there been times when we've had people at the embassies and they didn't even have bullets?
Yeah, rare, but yeah, those incidents have happened.
But I would think if you're going to send the military to Africa to fight Ebola, you used the word perimeter.
Maybe it's going to be used to surround communities where the disease is broken out and make sure nobody leaves.
I don't know.
This is another one of these things that there's a lot of for-show stuff here.
There's a lot of image-building stuff that Obama is engaging in now.
Yeah.
And voter turnout stuff.
Ebola's serious.
I don't mean to downplay that, but the purpose of the United States military is to kill people and break things.
And I just don't know.
But again, it may be out there to know.
I haven't really dug deep into that because that's another one of these things, folks.
I mean, to get deep into it and try to understand what the it's all political thinking, whatever it is that's going on here.
I just, more and more, I find myself resisting the seduction of the daily soap opera news narrative.
That is, to talk about whatever story in the proper, accredited way, like every network does.
It just doesn't appeal to me.
But I appreciate the call, Debbie, very much.
We've got another obscene profit time out here, folks, but we'll be right back.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchor man and truth detector and doctor of democracy.
Here's George in Norcross, Georgia.
Welcome, sir.
Glad you waited.
Nice to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Not suspect here.
As you can tell probably from my accent, I'm British.
I'm here legally.
I'm married to a U.S. citizen.
I wanted to talk to you about immigration.
Right.
Because for me to eventually get my full green card, that's a 10-year green card.
I had a conditional one initially, just covered me for two years.
It took me nearly three years to get that, and $3,500 in fees and expenses over that period.
Now, I want to know if the elite was going to have to pay that.
No.
No.
No, no.
They're going to end up being paid.
You know, this is crazy.
I mean, I'm not sure.
By that, I mean they're going to end up being on public assistance.
Look, I should be upfront here.
There are claims.
The amnesty types in Congress advocating for this do claim that there will be some penalties have to be paid and do claim that there will be have some fees and so forth that will have to be paid.
But what's going to happen is, and they also claim that the citizenship will not be immediate.
That they will be subject to taxes and so forth.
What's going to happen a couple of days after this thing becomes law, if it ever does, then somebody like Chuck Schumer is going to go to the microphone and say, you know, it's just unconscionable.
We've just passed this legislation that has granted them legality and they can't vote.
That's obscene.
And then they make a move to move up the process by which they can vote to next day instead of five years.
And they'll make these people are so poor they can't afford the fees in this legislation.
We need to waive those.
That's the way this would all work out.
Whatever it takes to get the bill passed and then change it to what you want later.
Well, I can't vote, as you can appreciate, because I'm not a U.S. citizen.
But they'll say this took me three years and I went through everything apart from erectile examination to get it.
Now, to me, this hints of discrimination.
Well, yeah.
I mean, there's all kinds of discrimination going on.
There's obviously a preference when we talk about comprehensive immigration form.
There is thousands of people.
There are thousands of people like me trying to do it legally currently in the system.
My other question is: when these illegals, and it will go through, I think, when he starts giving them green cards and citizenship, are those thousands of people who are trying to do it legally going to be pushed to one side under the back of the queue?
Yes.
That's not new.
That's been going on for – I think that's one of the great disparities here.
There are people trying to get into the country legally on whatever kind of visa that applies to them, student visa, temporary business visa or what have you.
But it all, every one of them, have various requirements.
You have to promise that you're going to go home at some point.
And then if you want to get in line for permanent status, eventually become a citizen, people that are following the quote-unquote rules of the law on this.
Nobody's looking at it.
I mean, they're scared to death.
That's where immigration law is being enforced by the people who identify themselves and get in line.
Well, I think it's possibly because I'm against service.
And if I was a citizen, I'd be a Republican over here, and that's probably why it took me so long to get in.
That's a joke, Rush.
No, I understand.
I'm having trouble.
I'm having to read what you say because I'm having trouble following you.
It's my fault.
So what is your basic point?
My basic point is why it should take me over three years to actually get my final green card and cost me £3,500, $3,500, I should say, when all these illegals are going to get pushed.
Because it is not automatically assumed you're going to vote Democrat.
Oh, of course.
Yeah, yeah.
That's a fact.
Well, let's not lose sight of what illegal immigration at the southern border is all about.
It's about two things.
It's about cheap labor for American businesses that want it.
And it's about registration to vote for the Democrat Party.
The assumption is that the vast majority of these people crossing the border are going to want the welfare state, are going to want to vote Democrat to keep it up.
They're low-skilled.
They don't have much money.
They have not gotten much education.
I mean, they're classic potential Democrat voters.
Believe me, I mean, that is the Democrat Party's attraction to this.
You, though, people like you, not automatic an assumption that you will also vote Democrat.
That's actually an excellent point that, you know, really people don't talk about it much anymore.
It used to be talked about a lot, the people trying to get in legally, following the rules, assimilate, learn the various things that you have to learn to become an American.
They're lost.
They're forgotten.
And nobody is making any move to let them come in just because they want to come in.
It's such a different story of the southern border.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Democrat Party turning on Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz.
And looky here, a story from a Republican consultant, why a GOP Senate majority still in doubt.
The answer to that headline in this column is money.
I think it's more than that.
▲
Export Selection