All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 1, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:56
September 1, 2014, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hey, greetings to you music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plane.
The surreal days of 2014 continue with Rush Lynn Boy behind a golden EIB microphone trying to make sense of all of it and help keep everybody sane, well-adjusted, and positively focused.
It's a mean task, meaning it's a tough task.
But if there's anybody up for it, anybody up to it, it's me.
Happy to have you here, folks.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Email address, ilrushvo at eibnet.com.
This is a, it's surreal.
You know, that the PGA of America just gave its distinguished something or other of the year award to Bill Clinton.
The guy cheats on the golf course for one thing, and I'll tell you how he does it later on.
But I mean, of all the people, it's just, it's an example of the decline of all the people.
You ought to see the people on this list.
Not very many have ever received this award.
People like Jack Nicholas and Arnold Palmer.
It is, it's just one of the many things in the stack of stuff today that makes you cock your head and go, what the hell is happening and what is going on?
And then CBS News, ladies, and they've got their own poll on Obama.
Yesterday was NBC News in the Wall Street Journal.
Today it's CBS, The New York Times.
In their poll, Obama is at 41%.
They are burying it just exactly as NBC News did yesterday.
The only thing they are finding newsworthy in the poll is, well, listen to Charlie Rose on CBS this morning describe it.
More of the crisis at the Mexican border, CBS News poll out this morning finds 50% of Americans think children crossing into the U.S. illegally should be sent back to their home countries.
43% believe those children should be allowed to stay while waiting for an immigration hearing.
That was it.
The fact that Obama's at 41% scant mentioned.
But they had to mention that the CBS News poll out today, 50% of Americans think children crossing into the U.S. illegally should sent back home, which means that 50% of Americans are racist.
This is probably going to be translated 50% of Americans are Tea Party, racist, superiorists, and so forth.
And I have a thought on all this when we get to the Joe Biden soundbite on this.
Now, the numbers in the CBS poll, 29 percent of Americans have a favorable.
This I'm going to read.
This is the front page.
This is the lead of the CBS poll where Obama is at 41%.
Okay?
Americans' views of both political parties are negative and nearly match historic lows, according to a new CBS News poll.
Just 29% of Americans have a favorable view of the Republican Party, down four points from May, and just one point above the lowest favorability rating for that party recorded in this poll.
While more, 41%, have a positive impression of the Democrat Party.
This percentage is also just one point above the all-time low for the Democrat Party reached in November of 1994.
Then you get to the next page and you find a heading, Obama's job performance.
President Obama's approval ratings on other key issues remain more negative than positive.
40% of Americans approve.
54% disapprove.
I'm sorry, it's not 41.
It's 40.
40% approve of Obama.
It's identical to what it is in the NBC News Wall Street Journal poll.
But it's just the way this is worth not even newsworthy.
President Obama's approval ratings on other key issues remain more negative than positive.
40% approve, 54 disapprove how Obama's handling the economy.
Well, I guess overall it is 41%.
And Obama's leadership.
That's it, folks.
I mean, that's the sum total of it.
And then there is, let's see, what did I do?
There's another poll out.
Ditch.
This is.
Oh, yeah.
AP.
With U.S. aimed the wrong way, most want new leaders.
Now, say, here we have the CBS today, which does the same thing at NBC did yesterday.
We spent a lot of time yesterday talking about how the recent NBC News poll was spun to emphasize Congress's low approval ratings and everything else rather than report on Obama's record low numbers.
And today we have more of the same from the AP.
In fact, the AP doesn't even mention Obama's name until the 13th paragraph.
And even then, they only mention it to say that Congress's approval rating is even lower than Obama's.
Congress has checked.
This is the way this story begins, AP poll, Jennifer Aguesta.
Congress has checked out, and the American people have noticed.
Three quarters of Americans doubt the federal government will address the important problems facing the country this year, according to a new AP poll.
All told, only 28% of Americans think the nation is heading in the right direction, the lowest level in August of an election year since 2008.
It's about on par with 2006 when Democrats took control of it.
This is uncanny.
It is unbelievable.
It's on par with 2006 when the Democrats took control.
The fact is the Democrats are going to lose the Senate.
It may be a wave election, and AP has a poll in which all they can report is how bad Congress is perceived, which is nothing new.
Congress is always hated.
There's a poll out.
Yeah, I didn't bother to mention this to you because this is every year.
There's a poll out about how people hate Congress, but 90% of them are going to re-elect their own guy, or maybe not 90, but well over 50 are going to re-elect their own guy.
It's the way it's always been.
Low approval numbers for Congress don't mean Jack Diddley.
Well, I'm glad I said diddley because I was really close there, folks.
I really was.
I've never said Jack Diddley before.
I mean, I've said Diddley squat, but I have never said Jack Diddley.
I don't know Jack Diddley.
I mean, I'm worked up about this.
I know it's the media, but this is outrageous.
Journalistic malpractice, what have you.
I mean, here we have AP reporting on a poll where Obama's at a record low in their poll.
They don't mention it.
They report it.
That's it.
They kind of sneak it in the 13th paragraph.
Even then, it's only in reference to how bad Congress is doing, which is no big shakes.
And then they have to say that the polling data shaking up this year with the anger at Washington is reminiscent of 2006 when the Democrats took control of the House, which they're going to not do this year.
And they're going to lose the Senate.
Congress has checked out.
The American people have noticed only 28% of Americans think the nation's heading in the right direction, the lowest level, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
This time around, it's not clear whether either party will benefit from the disaffection.
Oh, really?
It's a complete mystery which party will do better in the midterms this time around?
They don't have a clue at AP.
This time around, it's unclear whether either party will benefit from the disaffection.
Well, okay, so there you have it.
CBS News, AP both have polls showing Obama at record lows, as did NBC and the Wall Street Journal yesterday.
And they shape the reporting of the poll to tell their readers and viewers just how much people hate Congress and just how low the Republicans are.
And in fact, AP says we may be looking at a replay of 2006 when the Democrats took control of the House.
There's nobody predicting that.
So let's stick with the audio soundbites.
Let's go to John King.
Last night, CNN situation.
CNN wants to get in on this.
Obviously, the editors at CNN have seen NBC protect Obama.
They got up today and they saw, well, they were in AP last night when their story posted protecting Obama.
And CNN said, you know what, we got to get in on this.
I mean, we can't be left out.
And you've got to hear this.
This is Wolf Blitzer last night in a situation room talking to ACE correspondent John King about the NBC Wall Street Journal poll on these major issues.
Blitzer said, hey, you know, there's not a whole lot of satisfaction out there, John, among the American people.
Now, get this, my good friends.
He's essentially in Quickstand right now, politically.
I'm not blaming the president for this.
It's a complicated world and it's not all his fault.
But when people look around the world and then look at home, there's not much to cheer about right now.
And we have one president at a time.
He's paying the price.
They're looking for success.
They're looking for results.
And this is not all the president's fault again.
But remember, he ran promising Washington would work.
He was going to change Washington.
It doesn't work.
He ran saying George W. Bush had messed up alliances around the world.
He was going to fix them.
And they were going to work.
They're not working.
So in some ways, these poll numbers are people, some of them are the people who voted for him now disappointed in the performance.
Yeah, but it's not his fault.
It's no, no, no.
It's not.
Do you ever remember hearing that?
When George Bush was at 39%, did Wolf Blitzer said, or say, but it's not his fault.
It's not George.
There's so much falling apart all over the world, but it's not his fault.
He's really trying hard, doing everything he can.
He's not doing what he said he was going to do in the campaign, but it isn't his fault.
Do we ever remember hearing that?
So CNN, NBC, CBS, circling the wagons.
So today, standby soundbites 12 and 13.
These things are not in sequential order, so I have to tell the broadcast engineer what's coming next.
I'm sorry to have to do that to you folks.
You shouldn't have to listen at it.
It ought to just happen automatically, but it's the way it is.
Anyway, I'm watching, I got my two TV monitors on here today as I'm doing show prep.
And I knew, I already knew that Ron Fournier of the National Journal was on Fox on All-Stars, the Fox All-Stars, the special report Brett Baer last night, really hammering Obama.
I mean, really hammering Obama.
So I'm watching, Bret Baer comes on to promote the show for tonight, being interviewed, I think, by Bill Hemmer.
And Bret Baer is asked about Fournier.
And Bret Baer said, now, look, this is serious.
This is Ron Fournier.
This is not talk radio.
This is Ron Fournier.
And I said, what the hell is that?
This is not talk radio.
The heck does that mean?
Let me tell you, folks, I will stack up the substance and the seriousness on any issue we discuss.
I will gladly stack that up against anywhere else on cable news.
Now, what Baer meant was, well, talk radio, everybody knows, bunch of partisans, maybe a little loudmouth extremism there, but Ron Fournier, oh, Ron Fournier, totally unbiased.
Oh, yeah, Ron Fournier down the middle, certainly not when Ron Fournier forms an opinion.
It's really rare.
And I'm watching this, and I know exactly that's what he means.
And I have to tell you, it kind of ticks me off, this idea that just because it's said on talk radio means it doesn't count.
We are way ahead of everybody on all this stuff.
And I would dispute the notion that Ron Fournier isn't opinionated.
Ron Fournier is dead stuck in the let he may not think he is.
If you look at Ron Fournier on environmental issues, he's stuck right there in the midst of the environmentalist wackos on global warming, the AP bureau chief.
I mean, there's no question in my mind that whatever Ron Fournier may be a nice guy, I don't know him, but the idea that Ron Fournier never has an opinion on anything, and then when he does, that means it's really powerful and that we should all listen to it.
This isn't talk radio, you know.
Well, I don't know.
Maybe I took it a little too personally, but it just bugs me this kind of stuff.
Because as you know, as regular listeners, we're way ahead of the curve on all of these things because we're not afraid.
I'm not afraid on this program to tell you who's who, what's what, what I think about it.
Anyway, so what did Fournier say?
Well, we have two audio sound bites last night.
Now, this is during the pre-Obama press conference coverage.
And there's a discussion of possible Obama executive action on amnesty.
And Ron Fournier, the National Journal Senior Political Columnist, said this.
The fundamental reason he became president was he was promising there's no red state, there's no blue state.
I'm going to bring the country together.
He's been a polarizing president, and this would be a nuclear bomb that would blow open and make this country even more divided in a way that most Americans just don't want.
Right.
Yeah.
Your first clue?
No question.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm happy to welcome Mr. Fournier to the camp of right.
And this is right.
But remember, my friends, it was I who told you on January 16th of 2009 that all this is going to happen and I didn't want it to.
I told you it wasn't going to be the end of racism.
I told you it wasn't going to be the end of this whole unity and post-racial and post-American post, but none of that was going to happen.
I told you it was going to get worse.
And I gave you the reasons why it was going to get worse.
And that's why I said, I hope he doesn't succeed at it.
Fundamental reason he became president was he promised no red state, no blue state.
I don't believe that, by the way, as the primary reason he became president.
These guys all live in this world where the American people don't want any arguing.
And the American people don't want any partisanship.
And the American people voted for Obama because he was going to unite us.
We were all going to love each other.
And that's not why Obama was elected.
Some people voted for him for that reason, but not the majority.
The majority of people voted for Obama because of his race.
They thought they could erase the black mark of slavery.
There were a lot of people who thought there'd be the end of racist America if we showed we would elect a black man as president.
The other factors were he was an empty canvas.
You could do whatever you want with it.
You can make him whatever you wanted him to be.
He wasn't George W. Bush.
It was the third reason the media dredged up so much hatred for Bush and blaming Bush for everything.
I got to take a brief time out.
Don't go away.
Back after.
Okay, so the inside the Beltway conventional wisdom is Obama is in trouble because he didn't unite the country.
He didn't get rid of red states and blue straights.
And that's what he was going to do.
He didn't bring the country together.
He's been a polarizing president.
Yeah.
He's been polarizing since his campaign, if anybody was paying any attention.
He was never going to unite the country.
It was never.
That was what everybody else was hoping would happen, just like they were hoping to be the end of racism.
And just like they were hoping we get somebody smart because they thought Bush was so stupid.
And just like people were hoping the rest of the world would love us because they mistakenly thought they hated us because that's what the media said.
There was so much BS that was part of that whole campaign.
And it was all a derivative of the four to five years of pounding that George W. Bush got.
Obama was simply a blank canvas alternative that voters, particularly low information voters, could make of him whatever they wanted.
Going to be the end of racism?
Check.
Going to be the end of arguing in America?
Check.
Going to bring love back from foreign leaders?
Check.
Going to get rid of blue states and red states?
Check.
Whatever anybody, going to give me a new kitchen, check.
Going to buy me a new car?
Check.
Going to finally make other people shine my shoes for a change?
Check.
Whatever anybody wanted Obama to be.
He was campaigning on messianic platitudes in front of Greek columns.
I mean, it's just.
And it was all known.
It was all.
And then we have all these people now acting shocked that Obama might, after all these waivers on Obamacare, which didn't seem to bother anybody, and offer all the executive orders and all the other things, now that he might drop the bomb on immigration.
Whoa, wow, that might really divide him.
What do you think it is now?
The nuclear bomb has already detonated.
The nuclear bomb is Obama, not an executive order on immigration.
Crying out loud, simple as pie.
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back, El Rushbow, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Don't misunderstand, folks.
I'm not ticked off at Ron Fournier.
He's who he is.
But this business that just went, well, when Ron Fournier says, we got to listen, this isn't talk radio.
Oh, no, this is Ron Fournier.
What is this?
This isn't talk radio business.
Anyway, anyway, I mean, I can expect to hear crap like that on PMSNBC or CNN or read it in the newspapers.
But anyway, there's another Fournier bite, and it wasn't just Fournier, it was A.B. Stoddard.
They were both laying into Obama like they're surprised.
See, this is another thing.
They're surprised.
Are any of you surprised Obama might just grant amnesty to five or six million people?
And damn the results.
They still don't, for all it is assumed that they're right.
Both A.B. Stoddard and Fournier, they still don't get why Obama's doing what he's doing.
They're just stuck on the usual inside the belt voice.
My God, that'd be a nuclear wife.
That would divide the country.
Yeah, right.
What did you think he's been doing?
We're six years in for crying out loud.
Where has the unity been from day one?
There hasn't been any.
Anyway, here's the second Fournier bite.
This keeps getting better.
This is after the press conference.
Well, the first bite before the press conference.
Then Obama went out and did what he did, said what he said.
And Fournier can't believe it.
He can't be.
This guy's the guest speechmaker he's ever heard, except he isn't anymore.
This guy, my God, this guy's good.
He was so great with words, and now he just, he doesn't do words good anymore.
This guy, they all bought this notion that they were looking and witnessing at somebody we'd never seen before in politics.
Somebody was messianic.
Going back to 2008 campaign, 2009, they all drank the Kool-Aid.
They all think, my God, look at the crease in the slacks.
Holy smokes.
Great presidency.
Gee, whiz.
We've never had a guy this smart.
You know, he's as smart as we are.
This guy went to the Ivy League.
When he talks, we understand him.
He speaks our language.
This guy is brilliant.
This guy is a wizard of smart.
And then they're noticing here that lately Obama's been saying, you got to stop hating.
You know what?
The community is working on you.
I mean, even Daniel Henninger today in the Wall Street Journal has a piece.
You know why Obama's plummeting?
Because his words all of a sudden aren't magic.
He's dropping his Gs, and presidents don't drop their G's.
If you're going to go out there and talk about people hating, use hating.
Don't say Hayton.
Hayden isn't presidential.
And Fournier has a column day much the same thing.
Wow, Obama's really letting us down.
He's really surprising us.
Holy smokes.
Why, we thought this guy was as smart as we are, maybe even smarter.
These words and speech that he gave at the 2004 Democratic Convention, they drank the Kool-Aid so long ago.
And they still can't get past the fact that what we're really dealing with here was somebody who has no qualifications to this job, has never had anywhere near the real world life experiences that would qualify him for this.
They look at presidential qualifications as something really boiled down to one thing.
Can he beat a Republican?
If he can, he's qualified.
That's all we need.
And if he can beat the Republicans and beat the Tea Party, can make them look like idiots, that's our guy.
That's why they love Clinton.
They love Clinton because he routinely ran rings around the Republicans, and that's what they really love: Tea Party Republicans, conservatives getting shellacked.
And so since Obama did that twice, oh, yeah, man, this is a president.
It's a myth.
It's all been a myth.
It's all been the black, blank canvas that people could make of it, whatever they wanted.
Here's the second soundbite.
This is a guy who is an incredible Reuter when he's writing.
I'm stunned all the time by the passive voice he uses, which is very ineffective and sounds weak.
For example, to say Hamas is extraordinarily irresponsible, frat boys are extraordinarily irresponsible.
Hamas is a terrorist organization that's killing people.
Words matter when you're trying to lead a country and try to lead a world.
I'm stunned by how poorly he uses them.
Really?
Well, welcome to the party.
That's great.
It's fine and dandy.
I know it's frustrating, folks, to be this far ahead of the curve, to be this far ahead of the people who think they are the center of the universe.
This guy's an incredible writer when he's right.
Really?
Really?
Yeah.
And the passive voice he uses, very ineffective, sounds weak.
Say Hamas is extraordinarily irresponsible.
It's not that he says that.
You guys need to look into why he says that.
Why does he not call Hamas a terrorist organization?
You probably have seen by now the story in the UK Daily Mail about Obama's monster's ball, how the White House opened its doors to some of Africa's most evil dictators and homophobes and turned a blind eye to their human rights record.
Have you seen it?
The Daily Mail does a story on this, and they basically provide a rap sheet for each of the nine dictators that Obama invited into the White House.
They detail their crimes, have pictures of them, with Obama and Muchel smiling, greeting them as though they're long-lost buddies, right at home with them all.
Instead of being amazed that he would refer to Hamas as extraordinarily irresponsible, maybe you better dig deep and try to find out why he does not call them a terrorist organization.
Maybe you might look into being curious why Obama is three times as tough on Israel as he is on Hamas in the words he uses.
May not want to go there and find the answer to that, so we'll just chalk it up.
You know, maybe he's just gotten bored by the job.
You know, the guy's so smart.
He's so much ahead of all of us.
We can only hope to keep up.
We are blinded by the light of his essence.
His brilliance emanates in ways that we can't even comprehend.
Most of us only use 10% of our brain.
Obama's using 110% of his.
There's no way we can keep up.
He's just bored.
That's why he doesn't speak right anymore.
And that's why he doesn't take time to write anymore.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
That's why the economy is in the tank.
And that's why the border's wide open.
And that's why the VA is a mess.
And that's why the IRS is targeting a Tea Party.
And it's why what happened at Benghazi happened?
And the list is endless.
It's why the stimulus didn't stimulate.
It's why all the job summits didn't summit jobs.
We're the victims of a very real practical joke here.
And we're the only ones in on it.
Every other people are duped by it.
Now, A.B. Stoddard, in addition to Fournier, said, you know, I was surprised that he dodged the question about what he would do on immigration by executive action.
But he said he still wants to work with both parties in both chambers.
It's some kind of compromise.
But he's really not doing that.
That executive amnesty, that'd be very toxic politically.
So A.B. Stoddard and Ron Fournier were both just beside themselves at what Obama might do and the way he speaks.
Man, when they say it, you got to listen.
It's not like hearing it on talk radio.
No way.
Washington Post has an editorial today.
Frustration over stalled immigration action does not mean Obama can act unilaterally.
This may be the most surprising thing I have read.
Why are you laughing?
Don't tell me that you've just, you can't take any more of this.
The only thing you can do is laugh at it.
Is that what you're doing?
Try this.
Stymied by congressional paralysis, President Obama reportedly considering unilateral action to address, though surely not fix, the nation's immigration policy mess and the more recent surge of minors streaming across the southwestern border.
The president's frustration is understandable.
Faced with a genuine humanitarian crisis, Congress's failure to pass a fix is unconscionable.
They go on to trash the Republicans for a while.
But then they quote Obama from last fall.
If in fact I could solve all these problems without passing laws in Congress, I would do so.
But we are a nation of laws.
And to act on his own, the president said, would violate those laws.
And they go on to talk about the president threatening to just grant amnesty to five or six million of these people.
And then they say the president should think twice.
Some of the same Democrats and pro-immigrant advocates urging him to protect millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation would be outraged if a Republican president took a similarly selective approach to enforcing the laws, say those that guarantee voting rights or prohibit employment discrimination.
So the Post has to throw in that the Republicans might, you know, what would a Republican, a lawless Republican president do?
Well, he might take away the right of black people to vote, or he might not prohibit employment discrimination.
Don't you just love that?
So no Republican president's done this.
Obama has done it.
Executive orders outside the Constitution over and over again, now threatening the nuclear bomb executive amnesty.
And the Washington Post writing to condemn it imagines what a Republican president would do if he were as lawless as Obama.
And a Republican president would deny black people the right to vote and would not stand in the way of businesses discriminating against black people or gays.
Never mind.
There hasn't ever been a Republican president do any of that.
But nevertheless, frustration over stalled immigration action doesn't mean Obama can act unilaterally.
They really, really warn him not to do it.
They're letting him know they will not be on his side if he does this.
And folks, I have barely scratched the surface.
We'll take a timeout.
We'll be back.
We'll continue after this.
Don't go away.
Oh, folks, you got to hear this call.
If I understand what you're going to hear here, if I've heard it right, this is one for the ages.
This is Jay in Seattle.
Jay, I think I'm really glad you called.
How are you?
I'm fine.
I'm a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, and I've always been a fan of the Rush Limbaugh program, your array of sanity through the fog.
Thank you.
I appreciate that very much.
You're welcome.
Yeah, well, I was calling because I'm, as you may know, I mean, the folks around Seattle, it's kind of the liberal echo chamber.
And so most of the people I work with and just acquaintances, I mean, the majority of them are die-hard liberals.
I know.
They just defy common sense.
You can't really engage in a conversation with them.
I know.
And I know how frustrating it is to live amongst that.
I really do.
I've done that.
Sacramento was the same way.
Not when I left, though.
When I got there, that's how it was.
When I left, it wasn't it.
I don't know what's happened since.
But it changed when I was there.
Yeah, well, I mean, conservatism is common sense, and it just defies logic some of the rationale that people come up with to try to defend the indefensible.
So it just amazes me.
Well, anyway, what happened?
Yeah, so I went to get my teeth cleaned, and I'm just sitting there going through the process.
Okay, hang on, just that.
That means for those of you, he went to the dentist.
Yeah.
Okay, so he's a dentist's office.
Yeah, so at the dentist's office, they have this nice place.
It's in Seattle, and they have this, all these, they have computer or televisions in front of each chair, but the radio, they have one radio that's kind of on the windowsill in front.
And I asked Nicole, she asked me, what do you want to watch?
And I said, can you put on Rush Limbaugh?
And she said, sure, walked over, turned the radio to your show, and it was cruising along.
And then about a minute later, this woman walks over and turns the channel and just walks away.
And I looked at Nicole and I said, well, what's up with that?
And so she went over, turned the channel back, and then continues with the cleaning.
And then this woman comes over again, changes it, and my hygienist says, hey, wait a minute.
And then they get in this argument.
And she's saying, I don't want to hear something about I don't want to hear that tripe.
And then she started yelling.
And then the boss, the head dentist, he comes over and he gets involved in it.
And he says, what's going on?
And then she starts yelling at him.
And anyway, a few words went back and forth.
And then he told her to roll it up.
And he fired her on the spot.
He fired her?
He fired her on the spot.
I mean, she was out of there before I was done with getting my teeth cleaned.
It was hilarious.
And Nicole, I didn't get to talk to the head dentist, but Nicole told me that they had other issues where she couldn't stand watching Fox News.
That is great.
Normally, what would happen to a place like Seattle is that the hygienist you first asked to turn the radio to the show would kindly ask you, sir, would you mind if we turned it to something else?
What's her face over here?
It's just going to make trouble, and it would be really simpler if we just – but they didn't do that.
They turned the show back on.
The woman comes back in, starts railing, holy hell, and I can't believe it.
She's sick.
Yep, fired her on the spot.
She must have been really, I mean, that's.
Her attitude must have really been caustic and mean or whatever to cause that to happen.
Yeah.
Hey, how do I go about getting, or I've heard rumors that when you get special Apple laptops with a Rush Limbaugh logo on them, how do I get one of those?
Well, I don't, they're not laptops.
They are iPads.
We have EIB engraved iPads, except I don't have any now.
Okay.
And the reason I don't have any now is because Apple is going to be releasing new ones sometime this fall.
And I don't want to restock a bunch of iPads that by the time I get them and engrave them and give them away are the old versions.
So I'm waiting for the new ones to come out before we buy a stock of them and send them out to get them engraved.
Can someone buy one?
I mean, if I were interested, because that would just grate on everybody.
I mean, if I were able to have a rush motor, we're not an authorized Apple reseller.
We can't sell them.
And I wouldn't anyway.
We don't engrave that many.
They're meant to be special because of being rare and that kind of thing.
But Mr. Snirdley, I got your phone number.
So if and when we do this again, we'll be in touch and we'll let you know what we might have to do in order to procure one if we do it again.
I probably will.
I do this kind of stuff on the spur of the moment.
Seattle Media, I guarantee you, Seattle Media is now on the warpath and try to find out who it was that ended up getting canned at the dentist's office.
You wait.
Unfair.
How could they?
▲
Export Selection