Views expressed by the host on this program, documented to be almost always right, 99.7% of the time.
I'm inching up there, but we've been stuck almost for a year.
I think it's over a year.
And that's because it takes a lot of accuracy to move it.
When you're that close to 100%, 99.7, you've got to be right for a heck of a long time with no mistakes.
Bump it up.
The opinion auditing firm of Sullivan Group continues to audit deeply and report regularly.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Anyway, folks, what better way could you think of if you wanted to implement this so-called affirmatively furthering fair housing, if you have a war on the suburbs and if you resent the people that live there, because they had the ability to move out of dilapidated cities and escape dilapidated cities.
And if you're mad at that and you want to get even with them, and so you got a war on the suburbs and you're going to do this by building public housing in the middle of these suburban communities.
What better way to give a boost to the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Act and the remaking of American neighborhoods than to start injecting illegal immigrant populations into targeted cities and towns in the suburbs all across the country?
It fits perfectly with Obama's community organizer roots.
You overwhelm the local government social services with new claimants.
That requires higher taxes, higher fees to pay for schools, medical services, disability unemployment, all that.
Massive redistribution of wealth.
You're importing kids.
They can't provide for themselves.
They don't have any skills yet.
They're poor.
They need to be totally supported by somebody, Obama to the rescue.
Now, here's the thing about this.
Here's what you do not know.
There are towns all over America standing up to this invasion.
Just like they did in Murieta, California.
You're not hearing about it, however.
And I am here to tell you why you're not hearing about it.
Westminster, Maryland is a town standing up to it, just like Murieta, California did.
Oracle, Arizona is standing up to it.
In Nebraska, they're going to stand up to it when they find out Governor Fit to Be Tied.
Upper Michigan, same thing.
There are towns all over America standing up to this.
There are protests happening, but they're not being covered.
The drive-bys are ignoring them.
And there's one reason why.
The drive-bys.
You remember Murietta, California?
Busloads of children illegals dumped in Murieta.
People who lived in Murieta met those buses with long lines and shouts and turned those buses away.
They had meetings with the mayor and the city council, and they were committed to not accepting these busloads of illegals in Murieta, and they turned them away.
Now, the drive-bys, I am convinced, I'm so sure of this.
I think the drive-bys didn't get the reaction from their coverage of Murietta that they thought they were going to get.
You know what they thought they were going to get?
I guarantee you, when they put pictures of the protesters in Murieta all over national TV, what they expected was a bunch of other people all over the country calling the people of Murieta racists and bigots and all of these other insults.
They were thinking that by showing the people of Murieta, refusing to accept these poor innocent little children, that the people of this country would be outraged at the selfishness of the people of Murieta, California, but that didn't happen.
Did it?
They thought the drive-bys thought their news audiences would be outraged at the racist and hard-heartedness of the protesters, but that didn't happen.
The viewing audiences sided with the people of Murieta, California, so there won't be any more coverage of people in these towns where the illegal children are being dumped protesting.
No more.
You won't see it.
Because the drive-bys didn't get the reaction they wanted.
But rest assured, the protests continue to happen.
You know, I'm wondering at what point people are going to figure this out.
It's going to be slow, town by town.
People are going to figure out what's happening to them.
And, you know, we've been trying to warn people all over this country for five and a half years of what is ahead and what's in store for everybody because of this regime.
And, of course, we've been thought of as various names and this kind of thing.
But the reality is going to hit them at some point.
But it's going to be too late, I fear.
By the time they figure out what's going on, that there's something to be worried about, the mechanisms for stopping it will have been exhausted.
At any rate, that's that.
Now, moving on to some of these stories I referred to at the top of the program as what it used to be the light-hearted social stack, the wacko stack.
It's not what it is.
It's still the stack, but it's not, well, it's still wacko, but it isn't fringe.
It is indicative and has been all along of where we are trending culturally.
For example, salon.com, women who post sexy photos to social media are seen as less competent.
A new study finds that the virgin whore dichotomy is concentrated in a new place, young women's profile pictures.
If a young woman thinks she looks hot in that chesty selfie that she just sent is her Facebook profile picture, chances are another woman thinks she looks incompetent.
Well, maybe not incompetent, but less capable than if she were wearing a buttoned-up, button-down cardigan classic Levi's whatever.
According to a new study published today, girls and young adult females who post revealing photos of themselves on social media are received by their peers as being less attractive physically and socially, as well as less competent in general.
Elizabeth Daniels, the study's lead researcher, assistant professor of psychology, University of Colorado, said, There's so much pressure on teen girls and young women to portray themselves as sexy, but sharing the sexy photos online may have more negative consequences than positive.
Now, they think this is new.
They think women looking at other women and critically judging them is something new and unfair.
And it isn't.
How many times, Snerdley, how many times have you heard me say on this program in the last 25 years that the most ingrained envy and jealousy is woman to woman in this country?
And men never see it.
Well, not never.
I mean, sometimes husbands are made aware of it.
But it manifests itself this way.
You and your significant other female are walking down the street, and across the street is a hot babe.
And you're looking at the hot babe, whatever your reaction is, but so is your spouse.
And your spouse is looking at the hot babe.
She's not seen a hot babe.
She's how dare she think she can get away with wearing a shirt court that short.
Who does she think she is?
And there's all kinds of negative assessment and criticism going on.
It's vicious.
It's vicious.
It's been around for a long, long time.
Now, these people think they're on to something new.
And it's not new.
It's been around forever.
But to these people, it's new.
Women who post racy, sexy pictures on Facebook.
Bottom line, other women resent them.
Pure and simple.
But they're not going to say they resent them.
They're going to say, you know, she looks like a whore.
Oh, my God.
She doesn't look company.
Why would she want to make herself look that way?
But she just resents.
She's jealous, envious, or what have you.
Come on.
Snerdley, don't doubt me on this.
He's not.
He's in there applauding.
Everybody knows this is true.
Federal judge.
Oh, I'm going to get to the soundbites.
Yeah.
You know me.
I don't like to make the program about me.
There's enough of them here.
I'll get to the sound bites about me because they're good.
I mean, actually, they're good.
These I don't mind.
I mean, some of them, the Eric Holder things, it just gets, again, stupidity in the media and out of context, purposeful, out of context, stupidity.
But it is what it is.
So, yes, I'm going to get to those.
But I've got this stack here.
What used to be wacko stuff we would laugh at and put over there in the sandbox of fringe is now no longer the sandbox of fringe.
It is, if you listen to it, an indicator tells us where we're headed.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is not the only federal authority that has taken a stance against the name of the Washington Redskins.
A federal judge in Maryland issued a ruling last week that purposely did not contain the team's name.
U.S. District Judge Peter Messit, who is presiding over a lawsuit that former New York Giants linebacker Barrett Green brought against the Redskins, issued a 21-page ruling with the following footnote on the first page: quote: Pro Football's team is popularly known as the Washington Redskins.
But this court will refrain from using the team name unless reference is made to a direct quote where the name appears.
Instead, he wrote, the team will be referred to as the Washington team.
The note comes months after the judge ordered attorneys in the case not to use the team's name in his courtroom, according to one of the lawyers.
Now, I don't.
Is that not prior restraint of speech, which is unconstitutional?
Last month, the Central Atlantic Conference of the United Church of Christ passed a resolution calls on its members to boycott the football team.
That's the Reverend Wright's denomination, by the way.
So, you know, they're very, very severe about racism, except black racism.
Now, here's the well, Snerdley said, how can the team get a fair shot if he's this biased?
My question is different.
I'm going to have trouble articulating this.
I've tried articulating this for months now.
Let me try again.
We went for however long the team has been called the Redskins.
We went for however many decades that's been to nobody caring.
And then one day we heard a couple people cared and were offended.
And then all of a sudden, this year, it has become a political cause.
And it is said to be hurtful and irritating and demeaning.
Well, why wasn't it for 80 years then?
And then people say, well, it was.
We just didn't say anything.
Oh, really?
See, I'm on thin ice when I say this.
This is the kind of stuff that the left likes to harp on.
I just don't believe this.
I think this is being used as a springboard to all kinds of other stuff.
If somebody's really, really, I mean, just so self-absorbed that they can't function because the name of a football team, then something's not right.
No, I'm not defending.
That's not the point.
There's always it, what we are presented as an issue we ought to care about is really never the issue, is my point.
This is being used by the left to advance other aspects of their agenda.
It's, it didn't bother anybody for who knows how long.
And now all of a sudden it's become this bandwagon every leftist has to get on.
It just doesn't pass the legitimacy test with me.
Now, Rush, what you're missing, I can hear the critics.
What you're missing is that the country is changing.
These kinds of changes happen all the time.
What used to be acceptable 100 years ago no longer is.
It just happens and you've got to change with the times.
I understand all that.
But when I suspect that the changing times are not evolutionary, but because of the left trying to advance their political agenda, that's when I do my William F. Buckley Jr. impersonation and stand up and say, stop.
I also realize a very small minority of people see this as a political issue, but it is.
And you can ascertain that by looking at the people promoting it.
And move.
I mean, Eric Holder even came out.
We didn't play the soundbite yesterday, but he even came out.
Now, a federal judge, how many times in this guy's courtroom has the name Redskins been said and he didn't care?
Now all of a sudden in 2014, in June, July, he gets upset about it.
How does that happen?
You have to be talked into being upset about it?
Or did you come to realize that you were a racist in the past and you don't like it and you don't want to be a racist now?
So, to get rid of the racism in your past, you come out against the name.
How does this happen?
How does something nobody had a problem with for years, for decades, in less than six months become something this big?
I just don't believe it's evolutionary.
And if I suspect that the left is behind it to advance political agendas, I'm going to be suspicious, pure and simple.
And now, a brief obscene profit timeout.
Don't go away.
Ella Rushbo, audio soundbites of me, 12 of them, in fact, coming up.
But first, at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, this is Jamie, and welcome to the program.
Hi.
Hi, Ray.
How are you?
Pretty good.
Pretty good.
Thank you.
I wanted to talk about how on the 4th of July I saw the fireworks, but I really didn't feel like a sense of overwhelming national pride.
And I think that's purposeful by the Obama administration.
Wait a minute now.
Where were you?
I mean, who were you with when you were watching fireworks?
I was with the guy I was seeing, Eric.
I'm seeing currently.
But were you at a feel.
It's kind of a feel, but it's.
Wait, was it just you two, or were there a group of people?
No, no, there was a lot of people there, about 100 people or so.
And did even you're watching the fireworks, it's 4th of July, and yet you just didn't feel the pride that you usually felt?
No, and I think that, I mean, that's on purpose because we're made to feel like we aren't as important anymore, and we're diminishing in the world standing.
And it's on purpose to make us feel like we aren't good enough.
Like we're mediocre, and we are not mediocre and the greatest nation in the world.
Now, nobody said anything, right?
No.
You're just watching the fireworks with Eric, the guy that you're seeing.
Yes.
And the other 98 people that are there.
But you're just, you're basically with Eric and you're watching this fireworks.
Nobody's sitting and you're watching the fires and you're just internally manifesting a little guilt.
I mean, you are.
We're all being pummeled with this idea that there's nothing special about America.
There's nothing exceptional about it.
And we're guilty of this transgression here or that discrimination there or this mistreatment over here or what have you.
And so you feel disconnected from your own country.
You don't feel like it's justified to be patriotic anymore.
I'm constantly made to feel guilty.
Everywhere I go, it seems like I have to be careful about political correctness.
Well, look where you live.
I mean, you live in Moscow West.
Exactly.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, is not exactly where you're going to be surrounded by fellow patriots.
Exactly.
They'll think they're patriots, but for different reasons than you do.
They are patriotic because they don't like the country as is, and they are changing it and making it into what it should be by cutting it down to size.
And that's patriotism as they define it.
But not how you do it.
What it should be to them.
What it should be to them is a state of, you know, the third world, you know, state.
And we are not the third world.
And we, that's why it's a main third world country.
Want to come here and are coming here because of it.
And I think it's not a good thing.
Well, see, in their view, Jamie, we are responsible for the third world.
We made the third world by stealing all of their stuff, their minerals, their resources, their oil and whatever.
We took their wealth from this.
Is what your buddies in Chapel Hill believe, along with a lot of other cockamamie things.
And they believe that the only way to make this stuff fair and even is if we make ourselves poorer, like the rest of the world is.
So we find out what it's like.
Okay, our last caller from Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
That is exactly how it works.
On every issue that the left gets behind, they stigmatize certain behavior.
For example, they get off on global warming and climate change and CO2 and pollutants and the greenhouse effect.
And they actually create guilt in people who are driving around in their cars.
Oh my God, am I destroying the planet?
You know, people make jokes about it.
But it's in everybody's head.
Whatever issue that comes up, contraception, they stigmatize and they're almost subliminal, the effect.
So they transfer guilt and suspicion to people.
So this young woman is watching a fireworks display.
And because of the inundation she hits every day about how rotten her country has treated this group of people, or how rotten her country has treated that country, or how rotten her country is treating immigrants, it all eventually permeates everybody's head, or a lot of people's heads.
And then what results from this is what the left loved.
and that's a constant Self-awareness of all this stuff, and it's what happens to you when you don't, by by routine matter, reject it.
I will tell you ladies, I do not suffer from any of this.
When I see a fireworks display, when I see the U.s military show up somewhere, I am as proud as i've ever been.
When this country does something that I adopt, adore and love, I am just as in love with it as i've ever been.
I have no guilt whatsoever.
I don't allow these people to work this kind of magic on me because I reject it.
I have never once.
In fact, I do just the opposite.
When I see a guy driving a Prius, I give him an anal in my my buck, or i'll pass him real fast, or i'll go.
I'll go beyond a speedle just to just to just to ram it down this little person's throat, just to just to show them, hey, bud, you're not affecting me.
You're not making me feel miserable.
I'm not going to join you in feeling guilty and unhappy and miserable every day.
I'm not going to do it.
No, I don't threaten them.
No, no, no, I don't intimidate them.
I'm just telling you, I don't hide from them.
I see somebody driving around a little lawnmower, a smart car.
I am happy to be noticed in my car that I proudly get eight miles to the gallon with.
When they have these, you know, one night a year, they'll get a Hollywood actor to support.
I forget the name of the cause, but it's a global warming cause.
And I think it's every April.
It might even be on Earth Day, where they ask everybody to turn off all lights for an hour or something.
I turn everyone on.
And I do it with a smile, and I do it with happiness.
You have to, folks, you have to fight this stuff internally too.
You have to vow not to be impacted or affected by it.
That's exactly what they want.
They want everybody running around feeling the stigma of every one of their issues.
How many of you, when you find yourself in a group of minorities, think, oh my God, oh my God, oh gee, I'm a racist.
They think I'm a racist just because I'm, oh, my, oh, how many of you just, oh, my, I got to show them I'm not a racist.
I have to show them I'm not a racist.
How many of you feel that way?
Probably a lot of you.
That's just the stigma.
And that results from your assumption that they think of you that way because that's what the news media is telling everybody you are.
If you're not a minority, you have to be a racist.
So, and the war on women, same thing happens.
You'll go out of your way to prove, oh, look, I have nothing against contraception.
I have nothing because you don't want them thinking of you the way the media has told them you are.
And that's why I get into so much trouble with them.
Because I taunt them.
And you're not supposed to do that.
You know, you're not supposed to tell jokes about the left.
You're not supposed to laugh at them because what they're doing is too serious.
We can be laughed at and mocked all day long.
Have you ever noticed that there are really no conservative comedians?
And there isn't a whole lot of conservatism in the pop culture, in music, in movies.
And whenever there are conservatives, they have to meet secretly in unknown locations.
And they can't tell anybody where they're going so they won't be discovered because if it is, they might not work anymore, this kind of stuff.
And I heard somebody espouse a theory as to why the left owns all of comedy.
And this person, I forget who it was, said what you conservatives are missing is that the comedians are not liberals first.
They're comedians.
They're funny people who just happen to be liberal.
They're not liberals.
They're not ideologues first, who then also become comedians.
And that's what you're missing.
You guys take your conservatism and you want to be a conservative first and then a comedian.
You just need to be a comedian who's conservative.
And what they meant was, you need to sneak up on people.
You don't want to advertise who you are in advance and make yourself a target.
Now, there may be something to that.
But my television show, Rush Limbaugh, the TV show, for those of you that haven't seen it, it was what Jon Stewart does today.
But it was hated and it was reviled and it was ignored and it was never thought to be creative artistically because we made fun of the left.
Whereas Comedy Central makes fun of conservatism.
That's proved and regaled and considered art and worthy of Emmys and all this stuff.
But we made jokes about the left and you're not supposed to do that.
You know, all the updates they used to do, the global warming update and the peace update, mocking and making fun of the insanity that's on the left.
Not supposed to do that.
And so what was and remains a very funny program is never considered that other than when they need to try to take me down to pay.
He's just an entertainer.
But then the next day I'll be the leader of the Republican Party again.
It doesn't last long.
And the reason is that I just refuse to follow the stigma.
You know, when I turn on the shower in the morning hot water, I'm not feeling guilty about it, folks.
And I'm not thinking, ooh, oh, what am I doing to the planet?
And if I get on a boat and I sail around out there, I'm not worried about any pollution I might be causing.
Or if I get on an airplane, I don't think about any of that.
I don't let them get to me because I know who they are and what they're doing.
You have to actively fight this internally and then turn it around on them.
Otherwise, you can't escape the guilt, which is exactly what they want.
From Reuters, ladies and gentlemen, a high-level female Yahoo executive has been sued in California.
Are you aware of this?
A high-level female Yahoo exec has been sued in California by a woman who worked under the female exec.
She's accusing her former boss of sexual harassment and wrongful termination.
Maria Zhang, Senior Director of Engineering at Yahoo Mobile, has been sued by Nan Shi, who worked as a principal software engineer, Yahoo, from February 2013, according to a complaint filed on July 8th in Santa Clara Superior Court in San Jose, California.
The complaint alleges that Maria Zhang, the executive, coerced she, the underling, to have oral and digital sex with her on multiple occasions in Sunnyvale, California, and told her that she would have a bright future at Yahoo if she had sex with Zhang.
Have you ever heard of digital sex?
Does that involve computers or fingers?
What is digital sex?
Is it about comp it okay, so it's fingers, not computers.
Well, no, sexting, that's not that.
Well, it could be.
Anyway, Nan Shi, the underling, is seeking monetary as well as punitive damages.
A lawsuit also names Yahoo as a defense.
So she's seeking a lot of money.
Can you, I can't wait for the HBO movie about this.
Oh, you know, there's going to be one.
So you have female on female sexual harassment guaranteed to draw a huge male audience.
Oh, yeah, because the guys are going to want to.
What is this digital sex?
What are we missing here?
Greetings and welcome back.
El Rushbo on the cutting edge of societal evolution, an excellent role model for the youths of America.
And anyone else needing guidance?
Stephanie McHannixburg, Pennsylvania.
You're next.
It's great to have you.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
I just wanted to share my experiences with you.
Recently, our neighborhood in the neighborhood next to us tried unsuccessfully to fight against the development of a subsidized housing project.
Basically, that's going to be put in our backyard.
That would be called low-income housing, correct?
Yes.
Affordable.
Sorry.
Affordable.
Sorry.
Affordable.
Affordable.
Or affordable.
The kicker is this, they're going to build 35 two to three story housing units, a community building, and 76 parking lots in what now is currently a parking lot used by a car dealer on a very busy road, very dangerous for the new residents that will be going into this neighborhood.
They estimate 75 to 100 children will potentially live there.
And there's a lot of things that I think...
Now, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait just a minute, because you've already scrolled it.
Did you say 35 buildings?
35 to 2 to 3 story housing units.
Housing, okay.
A community building and 76 parking lots.
So its own self-contained little project.
Right.
On a parking lot of a car dealer.
Is the car dealer being moved or closed down?
No, they just sold this parking lot.
And we heard, it was kind of interesting how it all turned out.
One of our commissioners happened to be going door-to-door campaigning, and my mom thanked him and asked about we were trying to fight this area.
They just recently moved a major road, which kind of opened our street and made it into a throughway, which used to be a very quiet neighborhood.
So we've definitely had some changes due to, you know, just building and everything getting larger.
He then shared that currently that I should look into it because something big was coming.
And we happened to, and if we didn't do that, if that door-to-door information wasn't shared, we wouldn't have known anything about this.
And this would have been passed without anyone knowing about it because we don't always check our board website by design.
Our township board website.
You weren't supposed to know about it.
Nobody checks the board.
Right, exactly.
Nobody watched the board's public access TV show.
Nobody watches that stuff.
So you weren't supposed to find out.
But I think a lot of people would be interested in knowing the one thing about when a place like this comes in.
Now, they're going to have the 35 low-income housing, but 10 of them are going to be Section 8, and 6 of them will be for mentally ill.
4 will be for physically ill.
We did fight, and we actually got it delayed.
Now, they had expected to be building it already, and it has not started yet.
So we've delayed it for a year, which we think is great.
Now, let me, I need to ask you a question plaguing devil's advice I know that there are a lot of leftists in this audience who will not admit they're there, but I know they're there.
And if they were talking, what they're shouting at their radio.
Well, what's wrong with people like that moving in your neighborhood?
Who do you think you are?
Why is it big?
Why is it bad for people like that to move into your neighborhood?
What are you afraid of?
Why don't you like those people?
Huh?
Are you a racist?
Are you a bigot?
Are you sexist?
Do you not like the retarded?
Why don't you like about it?
That's what they want to know.
And I can tell you, as a stay-at-home mom, I've been at home for eight years raising my two children, and I have made a lot of sacrifices myself.
And I'm actually one that I don't have a fancy phone.
I don't have actually text messaging either, just because I want to save money.
We've lived with the basics, and my husband has two jobs.
And for these people to be able to come in, And when you look at it, the average salary that they're accepting is from $27,000 to $50,000.
And then they are going to put in all the units are going to have Energy Star labels.
They're going to have the Energy Star-rated refrigerators, washers, dryers, dishwashers.
I know the drill.
This is exactly.
Basically, my theory is that you should work hard.
And if you don't have it, then you should continue working for it.
And I understand everybody needs a break from time to time, but I don't think that you need to be put in a spot where other people would then have to pay for you to do that.
And our schools that they're going to be going into, they're already maxed out.
They're actually going to now have to expand our school, and they're knocking our middle school down.
They're going to have to build a new one.
Now, Stephanie, let me interrupt you only because of the constraints of time, but I'm sure you know, but this is, by design, this is what the noted author, Stanley Kurtz, who's written a book about this that's happening to you in Mechanicsburg, calls Obama's war on the suburbs.
And it is exactly your attitude that Obama would cite as the justification.
You say you worked hard.
Well, you didn't.
You just got lucky.
And maybe your husband does work two jobs, but at least he's got the freedom to do it.
But you're no different than these other people coming in, and you're no better.
And it's time you learned that, Stephanie.
This is an all-out assault on all the values that you hold dear.
This is about, I mean, I could ask you another question, Left Woodlaw.
Well, when did you leave the city to get rid of these people to escape these kind of people that you don't like?
Because that's only fair that Obama would put them back where you are.
Did we lose her?
Did I?
Are you still there?
I am here.
Okay.
Well, the other thing they do not have to do is they do not have to pay real estate taxes in full like we did.
Of course not.
They're disadvantaged.
Of course not.
Why should they?
They have been, they've been giving the excrement sandwich their whole life, and it's time you made it up to them because their plight is because of you and people like you.
So learn it, love it, live it.
Our last caller was really great in putting up with those questions, devil's advocate questions.