All Episodes
Previous Next
April 16, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:44
April 16, 2014, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yes, sir Remond.
Level check test one, two, three.
There we go.
There we go.
That's about as good as it's going to get.
Greetings, my friends.
Oh, we're a little hot.
We're a little hot.
Uh in a mix minus.
No, my voice.
My mic line line's a little hot.
Testing one, two, three, four, testing one day.
There we go.
Well, we'll make it.
You're not, it's not changing.
Greetings and welcome.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and the Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Here we are, folks.
Another big day somewhere out on the left coast.
Not identifying specifically where, so that the left coast taxing authorities will have a little bit more difficult time finding me.
Did you see, by the way, taxing authorities?
See what Rumsfeld did?
I absolutely I didn't know he does this every year, and I didn't know it.
He sends a letter with his return in to the IRS.
Now, this is a guy who has worked in the government over half his life.
He's been the private sector.
He was the CEO of GD Searle Company when they uh introduced Equal to the market.
And he's been the Secretary of Defense, he's been uh chief of staff here and there.
He's just been all over the place.
And he files his tax return every year.
He sends a letter, and he finally published the letter yesterday on Twitter.
Says he doesn't know whether his return's accurate.
He has no idea whether any return he has ever filed is accurate.
He tells he went out and hired the best accounting firm he could hire.
He got the best information he could from his wife, been married 59 years, they file taxes every year.
They have no idea whether or not what they are filing is accurate.
They're trying to be as honest and upfront and thorough as they can be, but it's impossible to know.
Even with the best accounting firm his money can buy, he is not confident that the tax return he sends in every year is accurate.
It basically is uh well, it's a little bit more than a wild guess because I guess I guess he's got some W-2s, in addition to all the other uh, you know, that income that these rich guys get from Halliburton and who knows the chaining Cheney Chain.
That's just a little pee into the left.
Um but still I get I I laughed at it uh because it's it's right in the money, and he suggests I I find it I don't know, the irony is here is a guy, he's worked for presidents, even the Secretary of Defense, and he's sending a letter to the IRS, dear sir or madam is how he addresses the letter.
And he makes a pitch for changing the tax code because it's simply not possible to know whether he is complying with the law, and he wants to be a law-abiding person.
I have sent in our federal tax and our gift tax returns for 2013.
As in prior years, it's important for you to know that I have absolutely no idea whether our tax returns and our tax payments are accurate.
I say that despite the fact that I am a college graduate.
Throws that in there.
And my wife is a college graduate.
And I try hard to make sure that our returns are accurate.
But I have no idea.
It's a great way to um to make a point.
Uh also, ladies and gentlemen, census uh is starting to release some data, and I'm gonna make a prediction to you on this Census Bureau stuff.
One of the first things is, and I can almost I can almost guarantee this, 100%.
But I'm gonna predict, and I just want to get it out there.
And I'm gonna be out for the next couple of days and maybe a couple of days next week.
I don't know yet.
It depends on some things.
So this is it for me.
This week, by the way, speaking of that, who do we have as a guest hosts on Mark Stein uh is is tomorrow, and Buck Sexton.
Buck Sexton from theBlaze.com is going to guest host on on Friday, and then next week it depends on.
Well, it just depends.
But the next two days definitely not gonna be here.
So I won't know.
Uh, well, I won't be able to be here and chronicle this prediction for you, but it's almost a guarantee that the number of uninsured Americans is going to dramatically drop.
Because they are massaging this Census Bureau data.
It doesn't matter what the real number is.
It doesn't matter if the number of insured stays flat or even increases, the number is going to go down because the regime is massaging the data.
They are changing the questions that they ask people here to rig the results.
And if you don't like it, you are a racist.
And I think one of the things the regime is going to try to do is with the census data that they massage and then release, they're going to try to show that the number of uninsured has dropped dramatically as a means of showing how successful Obamacare is.
And how beautiful and how wonderful a thing it is.
And how the exact purpose for doing Obamacare is actually occurring right before our very eyes.
Why the uninsured are all of a sudden getting insured.
So keep a sharp eye on that.
I uh because I don't have hardly, I mean, it's not 100% as anything can happen, but I wouldn't doubt it.
Uh in fact, Robert Pear, one of the reasons I'm thinking in the way I am here, Robert Pearr of New York Times Census Survey revisions mask.
Health law effects.
A Census Bureau, the authoritative source of health insurance data for more than 30 years, is changing its annual survey so thoroughly that it'll be difficult to measure the effects of Obama's health care law in the next report, which is due this fall.
And this is according to Census Bureau officials that changes are intended to improve the accuracy of the survey being conducted this month in interviews with tens of thousands of households around the country, but the new questions are so different that the findings will not be comparable to anything in the past.
They're redoing it in such a way that we're not going to be able to compare what they tell us the census data this year is compared to past years.
An internal Census Bureau document said that the new questionnaire included a total revision to health insurance questions, and in a test last year produced lower estimates of the uninsured.
Aha, you see.
In a test run, they ran a test of the questionnaire last year, a You know what?
Why it produced lower numbers of the uninsured.
Plus, officials said it's going to be difficult to say how much, if any change is attributable to the Affordable Care Act and how much to the use of a new survey instrument.
Well, this is just this is ripe.
If you can't attribute it to anything, and Obama can say whatever he wants to say, and the media will then parrot it out there, and then the late night comedians will parrot it further, and then the drive-by's will get into the entertainment culture and it'll be all over the place.
But Obamacare has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured.
When nobody's going to know if that's actually true.
This is my prediction to you.
And it's just more of the onslaught that we face every day.
More of the absolute just make it up as we go to advance the Democrat Party agenda, just fake it as much because they know that they're going to have total accomplices and allies in the media to spread it however they want it spread.
It I mean, this in my mind, if this happens, it's going to be deliberate fraud.
Nothing's real, is what this all adds up to.
Nothing is real anymore.
You don't know what's real.
I mean, the regime will not Release insurance data that it has and is making changes to the collection of future information, i.e., via the census, guaranteeing that the Obamacare rollout remains shrouded in mystery, orchestrated by Obama.
And I guarantee you, whatever they're gonna tell you, they're already on a roll.
Oh, yeah, we got seven million.
Oh, yeah, it's working out just great.
Oh, yeah.
And they make it up as they go, whatever they need.
James Carve says the Republican Party is dead if they lose the White House 2016.
Remember that.
Well, and the country's dead if the Democrats win if this kind of stuff keeps up.
I mean, once once the once once people have no faith in what has always been an accepted authority, I mean there's always been doubters.
I just think this is it's serious stuff.
We'll just think keep a sharp eye on it.
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston Marathon bombing memorial yesterday.
By the way, Obama went out there and spoke too.
Do you know he never used the word terrorism?
Or militant Islamist or anything of the nature of what it was.
He just called it a tragedy.
But the real fun began when the vice president stood up there, and less than a minute into his speech, Vice President Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of survivors that it was worth it.
You want to hear?
It's only 14 seconds.
We're going to have to, I'm sure the shock here is such that we'll have to play it a couple of times.
Let me say to those, quote, survivors, my God, you have survived and you have soared.
It was worth, it was worth it.
He said it twice.
What in the world could he be thinking here?
I mean, I can easily translate this.
I know exactly what he was thinking.
I'll tell you in a minute.
But stop and think of this.
You've got these survivors out there.
People died.
Things were blown to smithereens.
The Boston Marathon was tarnished forever.
Every time they run the race now, there's going to be this fear.
Is it going to happen again?
And some clown show up yesterday with his face fake rice cooker, must be from Cuba.
They gave away rice cookers down there one year.
And a rice cooker is a uh one of the latest uh weapons of destruction used by our terrorist friends.
And so they're always gonna have that in the back of their mind.
Here, the vice president was worth it.
How in the world, what in the world?
Now, if you do not understand liberals, you will not understand how somebody could say something like that.
I guarantee you that when Biden said that, he thought he was being as empathetic as possible.
He was being brilliant, he was praising them.
He was complimenting them.
He was telling them how tough they are.
It was worth it.
Losing that member of your family, it was worth it.
What was worth it?
What's the value here?
What was worth what?
People are asking.
But in his mind, he was addressing the toughness.
He was complimenting the toughness of it was worth it to show that we can handle these people.
It was worth it to show that we at the regime could help you through this.
It was worth it to demonstrate that these people who committed this tragedy, don't say terrorism, can't get away with it.
It was worth it so that we can show you how qualified, competent, good wish it was worth.
It's absolutely, I mean, you talk about insensitive, out of touch.
I mean, it's just it boggles the mic.
Listen to it again.
This and he went off script, and you know, he's trying.
I know this guy, he's trying to, He's really sensitive.
He's really in touch.
He's really empathetic.
He really feels everybody's pain.
And he wants to praise them.
They're the toughest people in the world.
It was worth it.
Here he is saying it again.
Let me say to uh those uh quote survivors.
My God, you have survived and you have soared.
It was worth it was worth it.
He went on to say, I mean this sincerely.
Just to hear each of you speak, you are truly, truly inspiring.
It was worth it.
I mean this sincerely, just to hear each of you was worth it to find out how good you are.
It was worth it to find out how strong you are.
It was worth it to find out how strong we are.
The audience, of course, sat there in stunned silence.
And after a moment of stunned silence, Biden then said, I've never heard anything so beautiful than what all of you just said.
He didn't say anything.
I've never heard anything more beautiful than what you just said.
Of course, the Democrats, that's just Joe Bing Joe.
Yeah, it was just Joe B. Let Bush or Cheney show up this thing and tell them it was worth it.
And you see what would happen in that situation.
Now it's it's uh it's fascinating, by the way, to take a look here, folks, at how the uh the I call them the the left-wing first responders.
Whenever Biden steps in it, or Obama or any Democrat makes a mess of things, causes an emergency, then you have the first responders, i.e.
the drive-by media to come out and deal with the carnage and try to recast it.
In this case, the regime's first responder was the Atlantic.com website, rushing to Biden's defense.
And here's what they said.
We, like most viewers of the vice president's speech, assumed that Biden was poorly talking about coming to the event rather than the bombings themselves.
Despite getting flagged by a Fox News reporter to quote, didn't even make it into the news channel's write-up of the tribute.
Of course not.
Of course, that's what the first responders do is they keep it out of the news.
And we, ladies and gentlemen, found it, and I gonna shield you from it.
So the drive-by first responders, emergency services personnel arriving on the scene, clean up the mess that Biden make.
Oh no, he wasn't talking about the bombing being worth it.
No, no, no, no, no.
He was talking about it was worth it attending the event.
That everybody in the audience attending the event was worth it.
Okay.
Well, let's listen again.
What is a quote survivor, by the way?
Let me say to the uh to those quote survivors.
What is it?
Why do you have to put quotes around survivors?
They either did or they didn't.
It's like my buddy Phil Mushnick.
Latest column of the New York Post talking about how the media is uh trying to really ratchet up emotions the way they report crime, the grisly murder scene, for example.
What's grisly about it?
And the favorite was the stray bullet.
Somebody got hit by a stray bullet.
Yeah, bullet was just marching along and decided to change directions and hit somebody.
What is a stray bullet?
Anyway.
Here's Biden, quote, survivors.
Let me say.
Listen to this again.
Let me say uh to uh those uh quote survivors.
My God, you have survived and you have soared.
It was worth it was worth it.
And the first responder say he's talking about attending the event.
You quote survivors.
It was worth it.
It was worth it to come listen to me speak.
It was worth it To come hear the president.
I don't know.
The thing is that these are the people that get all the credit for tolerance and compassion and feeling and here, another example.
Biden gets away.
This is a major, major gaff.
I mean, and but yet he didn't mean to.
His intentions are good.
His intentions are honorable.
He didn't mean to be stupid.
He didn't mean to insult anybody.
So it's okay.
Whatever he did, because he didn't mean to.
We know he's a good man.
So according to the Atlantic, if the survivors hadn't given good speeches, it wouldn't have been worth it for Biden to come.
The enlisted survivors make the speech.
Oh, my God, it was worth it.
It was worth it.
So I guess it was worth coming to hear the survivors speak.
But if they hadn't given good speeches, it wouldn't have been worth it for anybody to show up.
Noah Rothman writing at uh Media IT headlined yet another crazy conservative conspiracy theory proven correct in 2009, in the earliest weeks of the Obama regime, the White House made the controversial decision to take the unprecedented step of moving the Census Bureau from control to Commerce Secretary over to the White House ahead of the 2010 census.
Conservatives sounded the alarm bells.
It takes something that is supposedly apolitical, like the Census, gives it to a guy who is infamously political.
That was Rob Bishop, Republican Utah, talking about Ron Emmanuel at the time, who was the chief of uh chief of staff.
The White House dismissed the concerns of conservatives, which were indeed unfounded insofar as they related to the 2010 census, but the fears of some that the Census Bureau would be corrupted may today be proven accurate.
That's because of the health care data.
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Great to have you here, folks.
Again, 800-282-2882.
Mr. Schnerdley, wait, Snerdley not here today.
So it's HR screening calls today.
We may as well do open line Friday and Wednesday today, since this is it for me this week.
All right.
So pretty what whatever anybody wants to talk about, feel free.
It's an easy job for the screener on Friday to basically say, hi, what do you want to talk about?
Okay, hang on.
Um, but the other days, this program is really tightly screened.
You've got to be able to speak, you have to be able to talk about something I care about.
You got to be passionate.
Uh you gotta be able to get in, get it, and get out.
We haven't done a caller seminar in a long time, because it hadn't been necessary.
But on open line Friday, all that gets broken.
Whatever you want to talk about is fine.
Well, I mean, we don't talk about the electric bill and how it's too high or carrot cake recipes of that stuff, but whatever.
800-282-288-2.
Now, this piece from uh Noah Rothman at Media I on uh the headline, yet another crazy conservative conspiracy theory proven correct.
Don't forget that in addition to Obama claiming control of the Census Bureau from the Commerce Department shortly after his immaculation, they also changed the way the gross domestic product, the economic growth is measured, just in time to get better numbers in the months before the 2012 elections.
So the regime is is been engaged in a in a massive power grab uh since it was immaculated.
You know, I interviewed Trey Gowdy for the next issue of the Limbaugh letter.
I interviewed him Monday after the after the program.
He broke down and cried a couple of times, by the way.
He was so overcome with emotion about some of the answers that he was giving.
Uh and and talk to him about the fact that I have never seen in my lifetime the legislative and judicial branches just lay down in the face of an onslaught of the executive branch trying to claim so much power from both branches.
He wasn't crying about that.
I don't mean to imply that.
Uh but it it is amazing.
They claim control the Commerce Department right here in this there were a lot of conservatives back then who warned everybody this is not going to have a good outcome.
These people are the census is another one of these things, like the CBO, supposed to be totally apolitical.
Umpartisan, not bipartisan, but nonpartisan.
The Census Bureau is simply a head count.
Who lives where?
How many of us are there?
Period.
And some of the other demographic data.
But now the regime's gotten control of it.
And even at Mediaite, here's a pull quote from the story.
The changes in the census, and that is the questions they're asking.
Remember, this is for political scientists and social scientists and demographers.
This is a massive change.
Brand new questions, the answers to which cannot be added to or compared to previous years, because they're all different.
So it's like starting all over with massive data.
And here, the pool quote from this story, the changes will, however, likely have the effect of showing a reduction in the number of uninsured.
So my prediction is actually in a story of media.
And I promise you, I did not see this mediaite thing until after I made my production prediction.
But it wasn't a hard prediction.
If you know these people what they're doing, Obamacare is the number one thing.
It's in trouble.
It's the reason they're having trouble in the midterms coming up in November.
Anything they can do to change people's minds about how bad it is, they'll do.
And if they can come out and show with the census, because I guarantee you, most low information people are not going to know it's been politicized.
The Census Bureau, the numbers that's going to believe it.
Why, why not believe it?
It's the government, after all.
And these people believe everything else the government says.
These are the people who believe the government ought to fix every problem that exists, even though the government creates most of them.
So they're going to hear that, wow, Obamacare really, really working after all.
Why the majority of people signing up are the uninsured.
Boy, are we good people?
We're transforming the health insurance industry in this country to help the uninsured in its work.
And that's what the census number is going to produce.
And these new questions, people have seen them.
That's exactly the effect it's going to have.
Show a reduction in the number of uninsured.
And even make the point here that it's not going to be the result of the law, it's going to be because of the Census Bureau's questions.
It's going to be due to the questions and how they were asked.
You wait when this data comes out later in the year.
It is going to be the case.
Oh, something else in the census.
Terry Jeffrey at Town Hall.
No, Cybercast News Service.
I remember talking about this 20 years ago, 25 years ago, the welfare, social security, the number of but when I started this program, if I'm if my memory is right, in 1988, 1990,
it took the taxes of four or five people to provide the benefits for one social security or retiree recipient, meaning that if a retiree gets 30 grand a year just to pick a number out of the blue, that the taxes from four people would pay for it.
So you were spreading the burden of providing for that one retiree over four people.
Which I think was outrageous then, but it was considered good.
Oh, okay, that's a small price to pay.
Protect our beloved seasoned citizens and pay for their existence after they've retired or when they're on Social Security.
But then the demographics were changing, and baby boomers getting older, living longer, retiring at the same age, and the projection was that it wouldn't be long.
About now, that it would require the taxes of two workers to provide benefits for a Social Security recipient or somebody that's retired, living off federal uh donations or contributions or what have you.
So whereas that burden used to be spread across four people, it would be spread across two, and that would therefore cost those two people a lot more than it did 25 years ago.
Well, now it looks like we're getting close to this.
Because here's the headline from Terry Jeffrey's piece.
86 million full-time private sector workers are responsible for sustaining 148 million benefit takers.
And this is buried deep on the website of the U.S. Census Bureau.
If Harry Jeffries has the number every American citizen, especially those entrusted with public office should know.
86,429,000.
That's the number of Americans who get up every morning, go to work in the private sector, do it week after week after week.
These are the people who make America work.
These are the people who build America.
These are the people who can sustain it as a free country.
The liberal media has not made them famous like the polar bear, but they are truly the people who make this country work.
The 86 million people that are working.
And 92, 93 million people aren't working, but there are 148 million that are simply taking.
So you've got 86 million private sector workers, backbone of America, are sustaining 148 million benefit takers.
Now, not all of the 148 million are unemployed.
Some of them work part-time or what have you, but that's the number of people getting some sort of federal benefit.
And of course, for anybody to get a federal benefit, somebody working has to be taxed, is the point.
Now, this is a number that cannot be sustained for very long, and a direction that we're going that can't be sustained because eventually 86 million is going to become 80, and in 75, and at some point they're going to throw their hands up and they're going to refuse.
Their tax rates are going to get so high, the money taken from them will mount up so much in order to pay for the $160 million down the road benefit takers.
They're just going to refuse to pay the tax rate.
That's where this kind of thing is headed, and it's been going in this direction.
And this is what you hear politicians talk about, kicking the can down the road.
They want to deal with this now.
Leave it for the next Congress.
Leave it for the next administration.
And at some point, this is why there's a Tea Party.
At some point, we're not going to be able to kick it down the road.
At some point, it's going to have to be dealt with.
And that is when America stops looking like America.
That's when it looks like the Great Depression.
That's when it looks like deterioration all over the place.
And we're headed in that direction, as that number indicates.
And at the meantime, U.S. or the UK Daily Mail Online, one of the uh columnists there, a guy named Edward Lucas, I hope I'm wrong, he writes, but historians may look back and say that this was the start of World War III.
And he's talking about Putin striking at Ukraine and the Crimea, and the tanks are in fact Drudge's headline is World War III.
And his point is that Putin is striking at the heart of the West.
Just because they're going at Ukraine, remember the West promised to defend Ukraine.
It would be well worth your while to remember that Ukraine disarmed and demilitarized on the promise, started this treaty, if you will, originated in the Clinton years, and it was reaffirmed in 2009, signed again by Obama.
So Ukraine disarmed.
They got rid of their military.
They got rid of weapons.
They're sitting ducks.
And they did it in exchange for promise from us and the UK and the Western democracies to protect them.
Should something like this happen, except we're not.
We're threatening sanctions, we're huffing and puffing.
But basically, what we're doing is taking over the census to jury rig the uninsured numbers for making speeches out on college campaign.
We're getting all hopped up on who the next late-night comedian is going to be.
Meanwhile, Putin is marching.
And as Mr. Lucas writes, we can choose to surrender any responsibility we have to protect Ukraine and the Baltic states, or we can mount a last ditch attempt to deter Russia from furthering its imperial ambitions, and those imperial ambitions are to reassemble to reconstitute the Soviet Union.
That is what Putin wants to do as a former KGB.
It has always been his long-term desire.
He says if we choose to resist Putin, we will risk a terrifying military escalation.
I don't think it's an exaggeration to say this could bring us to the brink of nuclear war.
Now that I think is something written to grab attention, readers of a newspaper, but uh that is the logical progression if things get out of hand.
His point is what do we do here?
Do we just let Putin have it and get away with uh a strike at the heart of the West, or do we try to stop him?
And if we try to stop him with words and doctors and nurses and clean water negotiations and global warming threats and trying to appeal to his good conscience, not destroy the planet and all.
If that doesn't work, then what do we do?
Well, we've pledged to defend Ukraine.
If we don't if if we do that militarily, uh, that people are worried about that.
If we don't, people are worried about that.
That's something that's real that's going on that is significant, that is totally unnoticed by vast majority of people.
I mean, they're tanks with Russian flags on them in East Ukraine.
And uh the drive-by's are calling it a civil war, and it's not, it's an invasion.
And the reason they call it a civil war is because we have no business getting involved in a civil war.
Vietnam, how did that go?
How'd that work out for us?
A civil war is none of our business.
We stay away.
In the meantime, a brief time out, we'll get back and get to your phone calls.
So stay with us.
Don't go away.
Yeah, that's right.
The takers outnumber the workers.
Right.
That's a f it's it's official.
And it's significant.
The takers outnumber the workers.
That can't that can't keep on this way for very long.
I mean very long.
I mean, not tomorrow.
Uh, but you particularly these millennials right now are fed up with no job, they've got their college degree, and where's the big house?
Where's the Ferrari?
They did what everybody said.
They went to college.
That was the route to everything.
So they go to college, they come out, and they got nothing.
Can't find a job, can't find a career.
When they find out that whatever job they do get, their taxes are going to support people that are not working.
Well, we'll just see.
Remember, they're already fed up with the government, not for anything that you and I would be.
They're upset that they're being spied on by the NSA.
So the phones, as I promised, in Baltimore, we start with Mike, and I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you with us.
Hi.
Russ, I'm a hundred percent honored and thrilled to talk to you after many years of listening and calling and trying to get through.
I'm I'm delighted to be on your show.
So thank you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Really appreciate that.
Um, with regard to the uh Census Bureau, I remember reading the story.
I actually read it yesterday, so I don't recall exactly what site I read it on.
But um with regard to them changing the questions, part of their justification was because that the respondents were confused as to whether they had insurance and what type of insurance that they actually had.
So they wanted to rephrase these questions because the numbers of uninsured that they were getting, they believe are over inflated.
In other words, too many people were reporting that they were uninsured when in fact they had insurance.
Wait, they're guessing at that?
They're assuming that or they claim to know it in the previous.
But my point is Well, what now wait a minute?
Do you know whether you have health insurance or not?
I know whether I have health insurance.
I do have health insurance.
And do you but yet do you think that if you walk down the street knocked on doors that most of the people in your neighborhood wouldn't know whether they've got health insurance or not?
You know, Rush, it's confusing to me, and and uh you know, I don't know how that could happen, but apparently uh, you know, that goes They're making an assumption that most people don't know, and so they've got to come up with a new questionnaire to simplify it.
That's right.
But to my point is that if they're saying the questions were so confusing that people were not sure if they had insurance, therefore, more people were reporting that they did not have insurance when in fact they did, meaning that those numbers were inflated.
My point is we didn't need Obamacare to begin with.
Yeah, you know, that's that is an excellent.
And we certainly didn't need to do it the way we're doing it, if the sole reason or the primary reason was to ensure the uninsured.
We could have done it for $350 billion instead of the two trillion that's going to cost.
But see, you're illustrating once again that that wasn't the reason for Obamacare.
Insuring the uninsured wasn't wasn't the real purpose.
That's not why we're taking over one-sixth of the economy.
The real reason is obvious.
Look, it folks, I know this kind of thing.
Some people poo-poo it, but this is how every totalitarian leader, authoritarian, whatever, tries to get control of a of a population.
is to put the government in charge of health care, because when you do, it puts you in charge of virtually every aspect of the way people live.
you Here's another one, folks.
This is a story from Bloomberg.
It's a column by Megan McArdle, is Obama cooking the census books for Obamacare.
I swear I made my prediction before I saw any of this stuff.
This stuff just cleared the printer.
So we'll follow it up.
Right back.
▲
Export Selection