All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:23
November 6, 2013, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Wait a minute.
Don't tell me that's true.
Have you heard this?
Obama snubbed Christie last night.
Obama called all the people at one, but he didn't call Christie.
No, that can't be.
I just heard that.
According to reports, even though Obama called a number of winners last night, he didn't call Christie to congratulate him.
I mean, which is really odd because Christie campaigned for Obama in 2012.
They hit it off there on the shore.
It was two guys always, it was right there on the shore, not quite on the boardwalk, the Onyx Club, but I mean it was close.
And when that was over, I mean, Obama was talking about how great Christie was talking about how great Obama was and so forth.
And I mean, Christy, you could you could arguably say, couldn't we?
Could we arguably say that Christie campaigned for Obama but not Cuccinelli?
Well, he in that last week, I mean, what would you call it when Obama comes to town after Hurricane Sandy and you praise Obama to the hilt one week before the election, after you've just keynoted the Republican convention for for Romney?
Did Mitt call Christie to congratulate him?
Did that happen?
Does anybody know if that happened?
From the Hill.com.
President Obama phoned several Democrats who won Tuesday night.
He called Terry McCaula, the bagman for the Clintons.
He called Bill de Blaze.
We haven't even talked about that guy.
I am so happy I moved out of New York.
I cannot begin to tell you this guy and what did he get?
73% of the vote or something?
Yeah, you can predict what's going to happen in New York.
You can literally predict it.
This guy is gonna, he is gonna go after the rich like they've never been gone after before.
That's gonna be the sole focus of what he does.
They're not paying their fair share, they're gonna be paying taxes they don't know they have.
They're gonna be giving up money that they didn't know they had hidden away.
This guy is gonna take everything he can from them.
I am so, so I've toyed with the idea of going back to work just for a day or something just just to say hi to the staff.
No way.
I may never even land in New York, and then the whole state.
I'm not even, I may never get close to it.
I am not.
I am not kidding.
Well, flybys, you have to if you land at Teterborough, you have to fly by New York, but who?
De Blasio did?
Work for General Dinkins?
Not surprised.
Not surprised.
And then talking about this guy being the first Democrat to win since he.
What do you mean the first Democrat?
What do you think Bloomberg was?
He's been the liberal Democrat from the get-go.
He just called himself a Republican, so he wouldn't have to be in a crowded primary.
And so he could he could trade on Rudy's coattails.
Man, but this de Blasio guy, this guy, there's no disguise.
This guy's not wearing camouflage.
He's trying, he's not trying to make anybody think that he isn't what he is.
It's victory for progressives.
I mean, this guy is just, he is up front.
No hiding, no camouflage, no mask.
He's a sandinista.
He's a communist.
I'm telling you, he's a communist.
Let's just get right down to it.
That's what he is.
He's a communist.
Everything's the collective.
Let's just be honest about what this guy is.
There's no two ways about it.
And 60% of the vote went for him, and they know it.
How long?
Well, yeah, because he's going to get rid of Stoppin' Frisk, right?
So the question, how crime rate, how far from the well, they won't call it crime.
They'll call it socioeconomic circumstances leveling things out.
He's not going to call it crime.
When the poor starts committing crime against the rich steal money, it's going to be applauded.
It ain't going to be crime.
They'll say the crime rate's going down.
This is just people getting even for a lifetime worth of discrimination.
This is called redistribution of wealth.
And he's going to say he applauds it.
He didn't have to do it.
No middleman.
The poor wants their money.
Just go steal it.
Cool.
And if they don't, He'll do it for them.
I exaggerate a bit, but in 1983, when he was still at NYU, De Blasio toured parts of the communist Soviet Union and at one time served as an organizer with the anti-nuclear, anti-American organization called Physicians for Social Responsibility.
He was hired to work as a political organizer by a Maryland-based Catholic social justice organization that was Marxist.
And in 88, he was an ardent supporter of the Marxist Sandinistas in Nicaragua.
And he joined a number of his uh his Maryland-based Catholic social justice organization colleagues in a trip, 10 day trip to Nicaragua to help distribute food and medicine.
No wonder Obama called him Obama, this is probably the biggest Obama's chump.
I had to support this chump McCauff, but this de Blasio, now there's my guy.
There's my guy.
And then when he got home, when de Blasio got home from Nicaragua, he joined the Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater New York, which was an organization that held meetings and fundraisers on behalf of the Sandinista communists.
He subscribed to the Sandinista Party newspaper, Baricada.
And he speaks admirably of the Sandinistas to this day.
He's a communist.
I interviewed David Horowitz yesterday.
He's got a new book out, black book on the left.
And he said, look, it's time.
They're not liberals.
They're not progressive.
They're communists, they're bigots, they're racists, they're sexists, it's their religion.
They don't care.
We gotta, we've got to take the gloves off on it.
You're gonna love this interview with Horowitz in the Limbaugh Letter.
Uh, which have now digitized, you can get it uh uh from the from the uh from the app store.
Just search Limbaugh Letter on your iPhone or your iPad.
This interview is uh I mean I couldn't shut him up, which is actually the greatest kind of interview.
I didn't have to say a thing.
I had to carry him.
I didn't have to, you know, a couple of questions, and that was it.
And I sat here and smoked the cigar and said, this is my favorite kind of interview.
He was just off and running, David Horowitz.
But anyway, uh, you know, I don't like playing the coulda woulda game, and I don't believe in moral victories.
You you lose or you win, and that's it.
But having said that, folks, do you realize what could have happened if the Republican establishment would have supported Cucinelli yesterday, in addition to him winning, I mean.
The GOP apparently didn't want to win Virginia because they didn't want the Tea Party getting credit for it.
But we can also add to that, I think we have to be honest and say, that they didn't care about repudiating Obamacare either, because if there was a place to plant the flag in opposition to Obamacare in the midst of this rollout, it was in that election.
I can't tell you how frustrating this is.
Here, the country is just abandoning Obama and Obamacare as fast as they can on this.
And here's a race where the albatrosses of Obamacare is hanging around Macaulay's neck if the Republicans had gone in there and secured a Cucinelli victory.
Do you realize Obamacare would have gotten the blame for McCaula's loss?
And do you know what that could have done?
That could have caved the Democrats in Obamacare.
Now stop and think about this.
This is why this really frustrates me, what happened there.
Because if Cuccinelli wins, everybody's going to blame Obamacare for McAuliffe's loss.
They're not going to blame McCauliff.
They're not going to blame the Clintons.
They would blame Obamacare.
And imagine the Democrats running for reelection next year, see what happens to a Clinton bag man.
He loses an election where he had all the money.
He had all the support.
And you imagine what that would have done to other Democrats and their support of Obamacare.
It was a chance to plant the flag by the Republicans against Obamacare to drive a stake, maybe, a little one at least, through the heart of Obamacare, and the Republicans didn't take the chance.
wrong way to put it.
The Republicans didn't take the opportunity.
Now we know that the Republican establishment did not want the Tea Party being credited for any victory.
We know that the Republican establishment is happy that the Tea Party get blamed for the loss.
But can we also say that the GOP establishment didn't care about repudiating Obamacare?
Because they clearly had a chance.
The Republican Party could have really dealt a huge blow to Obamacare by helping Cuccinelli win.
And they didn't.
It's just.
As I say, I hate playing the could have, would have, what might have happened game, because it didn't happen.
But man, you can't deny what an opportunity it was.
Ladies and gentlemen, the um the official count of book sales is in for last week.
The official count is provided by a company called Nielsen.
TV ratings people, Nielsen book scan.
The Nielsen book scan for last week was in this morning.
Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims is the number one best selling book in the country this week in any category.
In all categories.
Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims is numero uno in adult children, hardcover paperback, fiction nonfiction.
158,005 copies sold.
The number two book, John Grisham, and the hardcover of Sycamore Row at 82,000 copies sold.
John Grisham's uh debut week was 141,000, but actually our 158,000 numbers, not the total, because there were about 20,000 e-books sold.
So we're up to 176,000, 115 copies the first week.
The second place book is at 82,000.
And if you throw in, our publisher has informed me that if you if you if you count the sales that we know that have happened Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday, we are over 200,000 books sold in our first week.
And we are thrilled.
We are excited because of the mission that is this book.
I want to emphasize something that I said yesterday as I engage in yet another attempt to say thank you to everybody here for this.
I didn't do this just to do another book because I've done that.
And uh you remember the discussion I had yesterday about what's the purpose of the radio show here.
I don't have to prove anymore that I'm number one on radio that's been there for 25 years.
Nothing left to prove there.
There's a different purpose for this now.
Satisfied the business requirements to make this a numero uno show.
There's a purpose here now, and that is share the values and traditions and institutions, protect them, try to save the country as it was founded.
That's a mission.
And it's something I care deeply about.
I mean, I'm uh I love this country.
I'm proud of it.
I'm I'm proud of the way it was founded.
I have no guilt about it, I have no shame.
I want everybody to love this country the way I do.
I think this country is well worth being a Norman Rockwell portrait.
I just do, I see it that way.
Now the left doesn't, and that infuriates me, and it bothers me.
And I the purpose here is to simply spread the word to try to convince and persuade as many people possible to agree with me.
I'm proud of what I think.
I'm proud of the way I was raised.
I'm proud of the opinions I have about things, and I'm eager to share them.
I've got nothing left To prove financially, nothing left to prove professionally.
I didn't do another book to do another book, didn't do another book to another celebrity book.
In fact, I had people tell me, you know, you better not do another book.
Why?
I said, well, because your first two books sold two million.
It's a different world, and you're not going to sell two million books now.
And the left is going to come out and talk about how you've lost this and lost that if you don't sell two million books.
I don't care.
That's not what the purpose of this is.
By the way, who says we can't sell two million?
It was just the consensus.
Well, Russia was a different world.
Back in 1992, your first book comes out, and there isn't anybody else doing what you're doing, and there isn't any book like that.
And you're new and you're validating what a people a lot of people believe, and they ran out and bought this thing in a mad dash, but the conservative book market's populated now with a lot of people and a lot of books.
It's a different world.
There's no way you're going to replicate that.
And so you I had people trying to tell me don't do it for that reason.
Snurdly knows.
There's all kind of, when I first talked about doing it, you better be careful, you know, just waiting to sew.
The left is waiting to get evidence out there how you're losing audience and losing domains.
I don't care.
That's not why we're doing this.
The reason for this book is to reach an audience I don't reach here.
Children.
The left has a stranglehold on them in the schools.
This is an effort to get the truth out about the one aspect, the pilgrims, the founding of this country, the values and everything that led to this country being founded the way it was.
American history has been corrupted and bastardized by the multicultural curriculums.
I don't need to go through this again.
I've explained all this to you countless times, but I just, I've just, I wanted to, again, remind you that there's a purpose here and it's, by the way, it's validated.
We're getting more fan mail.
It's just the greatest.
It's the greatest thing.
And this this the horse, the talking horse, the time-traveling horse, is getting fan mail at the wazoo.
Here's an example.
Horse's name is Liberty.
Dear Liberty.
We are nine-year-old twin brothers, Bobby and Joey.
We have some questions for you.
What's it like going back in time?
Does it look like going through a long tube?
Does it feel like falling?
Joey.
Can you go all the way back to see the dinosaurs?
Bobby.
Do you take requests for other stories?
Because I would like to learn more about Martin Luther King Jr., Joey.
I really like your book, but I'm not finished yet.
I'm on page 92.
When I'm finished, I will loan it to my brother, Joey.
Can't wait to finish the book, Joey and Bobby.
This is this is it's just cute as it can be.
And they're sending these uh these these fan letters to Rush Revere and Liberty, the uh the talking horse.
And here's a PS, a note from their mom.
Joey has been taking your book to school to read during class reading time, and his classmates are asking him about it.
When they say history, ugh.
He tells them about liberty and how funny he is and how cool it is to time travel and see what it was really like back then.
I hope his schoolmates get a chance to read it too, Rush.
I bought the digital copy to read first before my boys read it.
And then when I heard about how nice the hard copy looks, I bought that too.
I really appreciate this book series to help supplement the concept that I've been teaching my boys that America truly is special and blessed, and we are so very fortunate to have been born here.
And I believe you have started a trend that will catch on and build our national pride.
Please tell Rush that I have been listening to his show since the days of the Rush Rooms, and that my three sons are rush babies from the very beginning.
A woman's name is Robin.
And that stuff like this is pouring in.
I I'm just gratified, like I cannot express it.
I've got to take a break here, sadly, but thank you again, folks.
Awesome.
Snerdley.
I think it's safe to say that more people have uh have bought Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims and have signed up for Obamacare.
And signing up for Obamacare is the law.
You have to.
Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims is an elective decision.
Here's Denise in Charlotte, North Carolina, as we head to the phones.
It's great to have you, Denise.
Thanks for waiting.
Well, thank you.
And congratulations on your book.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
It's congr I appreciate.
I really do.
Um well getting back to the election in Virginia, um, I know we've analyzed and there's a lot of different reasons why Coccinelli lost.
But I think the primary reason that really needs to be taken seriously is that he lost because of the war on women.
The women's issues hit him hard.
They youth it was the same reason that Romney lost to Obama in close elections, this issue, this strategy from the left is killing us.
And the Republican Party is doing nothing to fight back and counter it.
And I'm telling you in 2016, we are going to get beat up with this.
And the other thing is is that while Obamacare can be an advantage for us, the left is going to tie and fuse the Obamacare and the women's issues together so that it will weaken the advantage we have to fight with Obama to Obamacare.
What would you do out there to uh counter the war on women meme?
Number one, I would use all that money that the Republican Party is not spending on qualified candidates to have a bad campaign that counteracts the propaganda on the left.
When they say we are against women we put out they're against women you fight fire with fire and show that they are actually undermining women.
We don't agree with that.
I think that's exactly right.
I but see this is what the Republican Party isn't doing that on any issue.
It's not just women that but look at what they're doing they've destroyed the black family.
They're destroying minority families what they're looking what they're doing to women with their policies.
I mean they're they're demeaning them they're turning him in nothing but abortion machines I mean you're there's so much that we could be doing we just fight back but the Republican Party even if they had all the money in the world right now doesn't seem inclined to do any of this caller had a point.
If you look at some of the exit polling data McCullough beat Cuccinelli by nine points in women he was up 24 though that the the gap was shrinking and it was shrinking rapidly as they got near the election on abortion it was voters that care about that as a number one issue the punk was ahead by 20% on that.
But on the economy and on Obamacare, Cuccinelli cleaned up.
So the caller has a point, this war on women thing.
Can I take you back to how this started?
I mean, I know some of you are new to the program and may have joined us since the, say, Republican primaries, which is when this started.
I'm going to tell you exactly how this whole thing started.
It was a strategized event between the Democrat Party and the Republican Party.
George Stephanopoulos who happened to be moderating a Republican primary debate and it was January of 2008 I believe.
Yeah yeah just right after the very beginning of the year.
And Stephanopoulos was moderating as the ABC good morning America anchor and a couple other people and in the middle of the debate he started asking Romney about contraception and it came out of the blue and Romney didn't know what to do with it.
He said, no, I favor contraception.
What are you talking about, George?
Well, I just want to know.
You think states should have the ability to provide contraception or not provide contraception or whatever?
And Romney was just totally flummoxed.
He had neither did any other Republican.
What the hell is this all about?
And he said, George, nobody's talking about this.
This is not an issue.
And Stepanopoulos just kept at it.
And finally, Romney answered and said no.
And that's how it began.
It became this Republican war on women.
And it just expanded.
It got into Obamacare.
And when the Republicans were accused of wanting to deny women abortions, the same old thing.
And it just blew up.
And it was totally made up.
totally manufactured.
And but I think our previous caller is exactly right the way you fight back on this stuff is to run is is to run TV ads and have your candidates go on offense about the whole allegation and turn it around on them.
And start leveling accusations at them instead of rather, instead of trying to cover it up or paper it over or hide it as though it's true.
Ignore it, hoping it'll go away.
Can't do that because they keep pounding on it.
And it's true of any issue.
Go on offense, be aggressive about it, and start accusing these people of what they are doing.
Start accusing the Democrats of being who they are.
And they're not liberals or progressives.
These people are collectivists.
They are far worse than just standard ordinary ordinary Democrat liberals.
They are genuine bigots.
They are racists.
They are, they are, they deny free speech under their code of political correctness and so forth.
There's nothing compassionate about them.
There's nothing open-minded about them.
And stuff is never said.
The Republicans, in truth, tend to think that they've got to try to temper that criticism at the Democrats'level.
They've got to stop doing and think saying what they believe.
Democrats stop accusing them of hating women and so forth.
Of course, it's never going to happen.
And of course, the Republicans are anti-Hispanic and they're anti-women and they're anti-black and they're anti-minority and they're anti-this, and it's all bogus.
None of it is true.
It's the exact opposite.
But they think the way to fight it is to, okay, we'll we'll show you we're not anti-Hispanic, and we'll come out for amnesty too.
And it's that's never going to work.
But the Republican establishment, the consultant class seems to think that's the answer to this stuff.
And it isn't.
But in this case, I don't think it was just the war on women.
You had the third party candidate in there siphoning votes, the other Republican establishment not participating in the race.
There are a whole lot of factors that led to this.
Yeah, there's a piece that, you know, this website that we quote from now and then campus reform.
They found a professor somewhere, this is some professor, says Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Cuccinelli sees women as sperm receptacles.
So you got some professor out there.
That's absolutely outrageous.
It's flat out B.S., a journalism professor.
At Virginia Commonwealth University claimed on Twitter last month that Cuccinelli thinks women are simple sperm receptacles and birthing machines.
The professor's a woman, Mary Ann Owens.
She made the remark in an October 15th tweet, discovered by campus reform.
She reiterated her views again in a tweet on October 16th, just wondering why a woman would campaign for Cuccinelli when he wants to limit women to sperm receptacles and birthing machines.
This is what said of you, if you happen to be pro-life, then you're a sperm receptacle.
I mean, this is the kind, and of course, the low information crowd reading this stuff on Twitter, and it it never it never gets counted.
Do you know something else that that happened?
I kid you not.
This is from the Washington Post.
Folks, do not you're gonna think this is making this up.
From the Washington Latino voters say health care and controversial remark spur them to turn out for McCallough.
Now, what was the controversial remark that he made?
I'm gonna tell you.
This is from the article in the Washington Post.
Cucinelli was pillowied in a Democrat campaign commercial for a remark that he made criticizing a Washington, D.C. law on pest control, which he claimed prevented the killing of rats.
It's worse than our immigration policy, Cucanelli said.
You can't break up rat families.
You can't even kill them.
And it's true in Washington, you cannot kill rats.
You have to capture the rats and move them out of compassion for them.
And he opposed that.
In a Spanish language television ad that aired last month, Virginia's Democrat Party denounced the comment, which Cuccinelli's campaign said was taken out of context.
They said he was talking about how disturbing it was that our laws treat rats better than people, because our laws let us break up immigrant families.
But judging by interviews with Latino voters on Tuesday, the ad resonated.
And all Cucciinelli did, he opposed that Washington DC, the city, has a policy.
If you find a rat pop, you can't kill the rat or the popular.
You have to round them up and move them someplace.
And he was saying, for crying out loud, we're treating rats better than we do immigrants.
And that became Cuccinelli anti-immigrant and anti-rat.
And I kid you not, they made hay on the fact that on an animal rights issue that Cuccinelli hates animals, hates rats, and hates immigrants.
That's what they did with that comment.
And there's no pushback on it.
No, I'm not kidding.
I'm reading to you verbatim from the Washington Post.
I am not kidding.
He crit it.
There is the law.
The law in DC says that you cannot kill the rat.
If you see a rat in your building or in a wherever you have to capture it and move it, find its family and move it.
You can't kill it.
The animal rights wackos have gotten in there.
It said you can't do it.
And Cuccinelli heard about the well, that's a that's that's that's silly thing.
You can't, I mean, they spread disease, they're vermin, my God, you and he said, you know, we're we're best you find a rat if you can't even if you can't find the rat family, how the hell do you find a rat family?
If it's a single mother rat, if it's a single rat, if it's a teenager rat, if it's a it's it's a straggler rat.
How do you find it's freaking family for crying out loud?
Well, you can't.
So you take the rat and you move it.
And the and the DC people, well, that's breaking up rat families, and it was horrible.
And so Cuccinelli said, My God, that law is silly.
We're treating rats better than we're treating immigrants.
And they turned that into a Cuccinelli hates rats and hates immigrants commercial.
And then they put it on Twitter, and the low information universe out there picked this stuff up.
And they cucchelli, wow, what a rotten ass guy.
This guy, he just killed rats for crying out loud.
It's just you tell me, you tell me how to combat this stuff.
I'm just out and out, outrageous.
This is not even lies.
This is this is just the kind of thing, folks, that 20 years ago you didn't worry about because nobody would fall for this.
It wouldn't influence anybody.
You you you have a policy that protects rats, and you get loose, you get defeated, you lose an election if you come out for a policy that protects rats.
Now the guy that wants to kill the rats or move them or whatever, get them out of your, he's the problem.
That's why nobody knows what to do with this.
Because in the old days, everybody was sensible.
Now I got rat advocates, and they happen to be Democrats and residents of the nation's capital.
And the rat advocates decided to take it out on Cuccinelli.
Uh well, you say it's starting to make sense.
Why in the world when this stuff starts happening?
Does the party, Ken Cuccinelli's party, why do they not move in there and mobilize and assist with just it's just asinine.
Totally, totally asinine.
Meanwhile, rats are being elected.
In a sense, all during the commercial break, Snerdley is saying you got to be making this up.
Rats, rat families relocating them, Democrat commercials.
And I said, you don't really remember this, because we we did this story back in January of 2012 about a DC law that said when rats were discovered, they could not be killed.
They had to be captured and relocated.
We even did a parody.
People for the ethical treatment of rats, which I'm going to play it for you here in a second.
Now, at the time this happened, Cuccinelli was the attorney general for Virginia, and he didn't want the city of DC relocating the rats in Virginia.
He was trying to protect the people of Virginia's.
This is asinine.
And here's his quote.
He appeared on a Cybercast news service story.
He said this law is crazier than fiction because it requires that rats not be killed but captured, preferably in families.
That's what the law says, by the way.
No glue or snap traps can be utilized.
The rodents must be relocated from where they're captured.
And some of these animals may need to be transferred to a wildlife rehabilitator as part of their relocation process.
The law does not allow pest control professionals to kill these rats, Cuccinelli said.
He said they have to capture them.
Then they have to capture them in families.
Cuccinelli said, now how do you do that?
Can I just ask how in the world you identify a rat family?
But this is the law in the District of Columbia, and he's the attorney general of Virginia, and he doesn't want them dumping rats in his state.
That became Cuccinelli hates rats, anti-animal.
And he, when he was commenting on the law, he said, we're treating these rats better than we treat immigrants.
Because he was talking about how we big we break up immigrant families in the deportation process sometimes.
It was against that.
He was trying to make a pro-immigrant state statement and saying, My God, we care more about rats than we do immigrants.
That was turned into he's anti-immigrant and anti-rat.
On Twitter and in Democrat commercials.
Now, January 13 of 2012, Ken Cuccinelli said that he was worried that a new District of Columbia law that governs how pest control operators have to handle rats may result in entire rodent families.
Families being relocated across the Potomac River into Virginia by DC pest control personnel.
And lo and behold, folks, I don't know if you know this.
But there have been reports of growing infestations of rats around the occupied D.C. protests at Freedom Plaza and McPherson Square.
You don't remember any of this.
I'm sure you I didn't know that they had run this commercial.
I didn't know the Democrats put together this ad, claiming that Cuccinelli's anti-rat family.
And that he ended up getting a majority of the Hispanic vote on that ad.
They turn that into Cuccinelli compares immigrants to rats.
And I'm sure that you know the ad runs and the Cucinelli people are watching this ad and they're thinking, nobody's gonna believe this.
Just like you don't believe it.
You don't believe it happened even now, and I'm telling you it happened.
You can't believe it.
Not only did it happen, apparently it swung the majority Hispanic vote to McCulliffe to the punk.
Because it turned voters away from uh from Cuccinelli.
When this kind of low information stuff triumphs, what do you do?
Now, the way, the way to beat women, or that to beat the Democrats as war on women's stuff is gonna be Obamacare.
But the Republicans are gonna have to, they're gonna have to want to beat back Obamacare, and right now they don't.
They're fighting any Republican that wants to beat back Obamacare, if you'll recall.
Okay, folks, have take a brief time out here at the top of the busy broadcast hour, but you sit tight because we've got much more straight ahead.
▲
Export Selection