All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 10, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:36
September 10, 2013, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we are back.
And the views expressed by the host on this program still documented to be almost always right.
99.7% of the time.
And as usual, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have here at the Limbaugh Institute.
A sheer delight.
Yes, yes, we are still number one at Amazon.
We've regained number one at Barnes and Noble.
There are other things going on.
Because of the level of pre-orders, gosh, I don't know if I should say this or not.
When in doubt, what would I do?
Say it, right?
And then suffer the consequences later, because I will overcome it as I always do.
Talk about Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims.
Time travel adventures with exceptional America.
The pre-orders are I don't, folks, it's not unprecedented what's happening, but it is it is close.
And because of the level of pre-orders, decisions on stock, let's put it that way.
Decisions on how many copies to stock are being revised upwards, which is just I can't.
I can't tell you.
And of course, what this is, this book is a way of teaching what isn't being taught.
I didn't know this.
I learned yesterday from a phone call, there's a movie coming out.
Free birds or something.
Free birds.
It's an animated cartoon movie.
Woody Harrelson does one of the voiceovers.
And it's about a couple turkeys that time travel.
Go back to Thanksgiving and remove Turkey from the first Thanksgiving dinner, so that turkeys, of course, are spared.
Animal rights, you know.
But then it goes on to portray the pilgrims as a bunch of really evil white guys that came to this region, this country, the North America, and perverted it and corrupted it and all that.
And it's exactly that and this movie I found been in production or the idea germinated back in 2009.
It's it's it's been in development for four years.
And they're just bringing it out around Thanksgiving and Christmas this year.
And it is a genuine bastardization of American history.
And it's being done by a bunch of leftist multiculturalists who do not like this country and want to and do not want kids, young skulls full of mush learning the truth.
And of course, this book is to counter all of that.
Movies like that, what's being taught in the schools that's incorrect.
There's not a political agenda to my book, folks.
There really isn't.
It's just true historical fact.
And that alone's gonna make it controversial.
Although there's nothing in the book that is controversial.
It's just the truth of the pilgrims.
And who they were and why they came, and what happened to them when they got here.
And it does contain the true story of Thanksgiving, and it's an entertaining way it's for kids, seven to or ten to thirteen, but it's for everybody.
I don't like mentioning it's written for that age group, but it's for everybody.
And it's if if you are troubled by what kids are learning, I'm telling you, this is it's a it's a great way to counter it, and that's why it was written.
It's a way of teaching what isn't being taught.
This book promotes the greatness of America, American exceptionalism, the kind of people that came here and overcame hardship and obstacles to realize their dreams.
It's a unique story, it's a blessed story.
It is a great story.
It's why we're all here.
And it's uh it's an it's an attempt to give kids the truth.
The things you and I were all taught that are no longer taught because the multiculturalists have taken over the uh curriculum.
So Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims pre-order it out.
It's in Amazon, iBooks, Barnes and Noble, the pre-orders, and it's out October 29th.
And it's not a it's 214 pages, it's a real book.
And it's got a price you can't beat.
We saw to that.
Uh so like 10 or 11 dollars.
That's before any discounts take place.
But it tells these kids who William Bradford was.
The Exceptional people, the stories, rags to riches that made it with hard work and determination, a little luck and the grace of God.
You read what William Bradford wrote, and much of that's in this book, there was thanks to God consistently.
These were religious people or Puritans.
That's why they came.
For religious freedom, religious liberty, liberty overall.
It's a great, great story.
There's nothing wrong with this story.
Except modern leftists hate it for whatever inexplicable reason.
And again, it remains at number one in the pre-orders that all these places and you all are just uh I don't know how to we're just blown away.
We can't thank you enough.
Our appreciation and gratitude here is uh is boundless, and that's the update on it.
And if there and and and the pre-orders are such that um all the retailers have uh, you know, we want more.
So it will be available on October 29th.
Now, Don just said, you're gonna create a panic that there won't be enough stock.
Well, if you're worried about that, pre-order.
The pre-orders end up being delivered on October 29th, but there will be stock.
That's uh we we're not running this like Apple does with their iPhones, announce it, and you've got to wait three weeks to get one.
That isn't gonna be the way this is.
You want it, you're gonna be able to get it.
And we priced this so that you can buy multiple copies to give as gifts at Christmas time.
You check it out, you'll see.
Now, yesterday, in addition to that call we had about the Free Birds movie that I had not heard of, I had a call from a woman, and I imagine that this uh might be something that a lot of you think.
That all this attention on Syria is causing other things to be swept aside and not being talked about on this program and and and others.
And I understand your concern about this, but I I, in good conscience, I can't just slough this off.
Uh I can't act like this is some purposeful diversionary trick.
If I had not spent a lot of time on Obamacare, and if you in this audience were not fully aware of it already, I'd have a little bit different attitude.
But you know, when somebody calls and God bless them, I'm not being critical when they call in and say, Rush, rush, you're being sidetracked.
It's not true because you in this audience already are fully up to speed on Obamacare.
You know what a disaster it is.
Just because it may not be in the news front and center for a couple of days, doesn't mean that you have forgotten about it.
And of that I am I'm totally confident.
But we do have a couple of bits of news about it today that we'll that we'll get to.
But there are just a couple of other things about the Syria business that I want to uh that I want to mention.
The New York Times story that I quoted right before the break at the top of the hour claims that this is Putin's idea.
Not Carries.
They don't even mention the John Kerry gaff in this story.
They don't even mention the John Kerry gaff.
And they just say that Putin came up with this idea to take all the chemical weapons out of Syria and that the regime took it because, oh, that's a wonderful thing.
No more chemical weapons will be used.
No more chemical weapons will exist in Syria.
It's a beautiful thing.
In which case I said, well, shouldn't Putin be addressing us on TV tonight instead of uh instead of Obama.
But the New York Times story makes it look like that Putin saved the day, that Putin saved Obama.
And he didn't.
Putin again has beaten Obama.
There is there's no two ways about that.
Putin comes out The big winner.
Putin gets credit for getting the weapons out of Syria if they're out.
Putin gets credit for holding the weapons, so Putin gets credit for being trustworthy in all this.
Putin gets credit for there being no U.S. military attack.
And it's being portrayed here as Putin saves Obama.
Lee Smith writing of the weekly standard today.
Maybe Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin really did discuss the idea of putting Syrian chemical weapons under international control last week.
Putin sure doesn't care that Obama's taking credit for the proposal or that the administration is posturing like a mob enforcer.
The only reason why we are seeing this proposal, said Jay Carney, is because of the U.S. threat of military action.
In truth, Putin is laughing to himself.
Whatever, if Obama wants to sell it like a Christmas miracle on Pennsylvania Avenue, that's fine with Putin because Putin won.
These people, Carney, Carey, talking about the threat of U.S. military action, sending chills up the spine of Assad.
U.S. liberals don't even believe in that.
You let you let a Republican president threaten military force, and who do they run to?
You go back to Gorbachev and Reagan.
The liberals were scared to death that Reagan's finger was on the nuke button, proverbially.
And they ran to Gorbachev and asked him to save the world.
They don't like the threat of U.S. military force.
Except now they do.
Now they're claiming that the world is respectful of them and scared of them.
And I and this guy at the Weekly Standard has it exactly right.
Here's a pull quote.
The president's supporters and publicists in the press know how to package Obama's weakness.
The fear that everyone else in the world smells emanating from him like a wounded animal is really just humility and modesty.
Fitting attributes for the leader of a superpower that needs to make amends for having meddled so long in the affairs of others.
And besides, this talk of strength and weakness is juvenile.
The world is not a schoolyard.
And so Obama ignored Putin's slights and held his head high.
This revealed to Putin Obama's real liability, his vanity.
Obama always needs to look good.
That's the key.
That's how you own Obama.
You engineer it so he can make it look like he's the good guy that he looks like the smartest guy in the room, so the press can position it there.
You can get whatever you want out of Obama if you allow him to look like the smartest guy in the room.
And that's what Putin has done here, and that's where Putin is the winner.
He will embrace defeat so long as he this is Obama.
He will embrace defeat so long as he can still imagine himself a handsome princeling.
After pushing Obama around for five years, now Putin escorts him out of the Middle East.
Here, my friend, take my hand.
Let me help you to the sidelines.
Putin's goal is to replace the United States as the regional power broker in the Middle East.
And he's just done it.
And that's why everybody is chuckling over this.
This U.S. weakness on display.
This John Kerry Gaff now all of a sudden turned into a brilliant bit of foreign policy.
They're laughing themselves serious.
They're silly in Moscow.
I'm not, folks, I'm not saying this because I oppose Obama politically.
This isn't partisan.
I don't know how many of you wonder over the course of your lives.
Why wherever there's trouble in the world, why is it always incumbent on us to be involved and maybe be the solution?
And there's always been a reason for that.
We were the world's power, not just militarily, but morally, folks.
We had the moral authority because of who we were.
We had the military might, but we had the moral authority to stand by it and use it.
That's what's gone now.
And we have the Military might, but we're reluctant to project it in real ways, and even Obama and Kerry said this isn't going to be any big deal, just a couple of missiles, 25 minutes, no big deal.
They bragged about how small the attack would be.
Unbelievably small carries that they would go overboard trying to assure everybody that it wasn't going to be really big or really bad.
It was going to be unbelievably small.
Now the Russians have always wanted to be us.
And the Chinese want to be us.
They want to be the power brokers in all of these hotspot regions, particularly where there is oil.
And it's looking a lot to people like Putin now.
I mean, who's getting the credit?
Putin got rid of the chemical weapons.
Putin's idea.
New York Times credits Putin, not Kerry, folks.
They don't even mention Kerry's gaff.
In fact, let me ask you that where do you think Assad got his chemical weapons?
Iran?
Russia?
Who would really be surprised if Assad got most of their chemical weapons from the Russians in the first place?
So this is like a lend lease between Russia and Syria.
The Russians take the poison gas that they gave for now and give it back if Assad needs it again once we are effectively out of the picture.
And if this was discussed between Putin and Obama at such a high level last week, why didn't Kerry know that?
Because Kerry said this idea would be when Kerry proposed this, that everybody's now claiming Obama genius, Kerry's idea that everybody's accepted now, and Obama is running, oh, yeah, yeah, Putin and I were talking about that last week in a G20.
Why didn't Kerry know that?
When Kerry proposed it, why did the State Department try to walk it back?
Why did they admit that it was a gaffe, a rhetorical exercise?
Why were they embarrassed by it?
Why were they frightened of it?
Why did Kerry call the Russians say, hey, I'm not serious, I'm just kidding here, and he tried to walk it back.
If Putin and Obama have been seriously discussed this last week, then why didn't the State Department know it?
Why didn't Kerry know it?
Kerry's out there saying the plan wouldn't be possible anyway because Assad would never get rid of his chemical weapons.
He wouldn't give them away.
So how come the State Department didn't know that?
They said the plan would be impossible.
Yet here's Obama saying, oh yeah, let him in talking about this last week in G twenty.
And Obama has been talking with with members of Congress till he was blue in the face.
How come none of them knew about this option?
Just yesterday, Obama was preparing to do a national address to the country tonight, preparing us for a strike on Syria.
Then Kerry makes his gaff.
If Obama's been talking to Putin about this last week, serious high-level discussions on this specific idea of Assad getting rid of his uh chemical weapons and Russia, international community police, why didn't anybody know this?
The obvious answer to me is I think they're all making this up.
I think they're flying along as it goes, and they're gloming onto it as it happens and trying to take credit for what they think is a good thing as it just happens.
And there wasn't any high-level discussion about this last week.
And Putin is content to let Obama go ahead and talk about that, because Putin knows that all you have to do to get what you want out of Obama is structure so that he looks like the smartest guy in the world and you can have anything you want, because that's all Obama and his minions in the media care about.
And excuse me, folks, now we're back.
And uh let's go to the phone.
It's gonna start with Lisa, Lisa in St. Louis.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks so much.
You know, you've said it before.
Obama is our first true pop culture president.
And he is he is nourished, supported, fed by the pop culture of of this country.
And it really is gonna have to be the pop culture that takes him down.
And so the question is.
I agree with that, by the way.
I agree with that and have have have tried to make that point to be it isn't gonna be a massive political event like this that does it.
Right.
You're absolutely right about that.
And and and the question then becomes when will pop culture finally get its intelligence insulted?
You know, my intelligence on this guy has been insulted since day one.
But when will the likes of John Stewart and the writers at uh you know SNL, who are also nourished and fed and supported by the pop culture, and I guess help create the pop culture.
When will they finally not be able to take it?
Because when that happens, and when Obama loses that nourishment, that's going to be a little bit more than a little bit of a little to him.
Let me tell you what's effervescing right now, below the surface, and that is all of these pop culture uh entertainment icons, actors and actresses primarily, they are seething over the potential use of force in Syria.
And they just, you know, they were being told to shut up for the good of Obama, shut up, shut up, but they can't some of them just couldn't stop it, and they're and they're they're they were threatening to break out now because of of what's happened.
There isn't going to be any U.S. military action in Syria, and so there's gonna be no reason for them to start to come out and and and oppose Obama for doing that.
So they that that that is something that you might have had hopes that would happen, i.e.
the left anti-war Hollywood crowd finally rising up against Obama.
It's not going to happen because there isn't going to be a military strike.
Yeah.
Well, I just this is so badly bungled.
You talked about SNL at the beginning of the show.
I mean, this script is written.
The skit you don't even have to write it.
Lisa, hang on.
It's listen, right?
Hang on, I've got a good break here, but I want to I know you're not through, so I want to continue this when we get back.
Okay, we are back with Lisa in St. Louis, and I feel b I I I interrupted the point that you were making, and I knew you were in a uh you want it you were on a on a roller making a point about the pop culture in Saturday Night Live and all that.
Um I just wanted to ask you what what pop culture meltdowns I don't think there's anything that's ever going to change the writers of the Daily Show's opinion on Obama or David Letterman or I mean you you name it, Saturday Night Live.
They are gonna band together, no matter how bad a mistake, gaff, whatever this guy might ever make, they're gonna band together, prop him up and protect him and support him because of race, Lisa.
I uh I hear that, but I mean, it's so obviously ripe for picking.
It's like, are you kidding me?
H how do they maintain their credibility as drivers of the pop culture if they don't do something with that red line, if they don't do something with, you know, uh uh the gaff that Kerry did that now has become, you know, he is the he he's the chief diplomat of the country.
That has now become, you know, uh the uh the administration's policy.
I just feel like i it it's getting to the point.
This is bungled so badly.
And the other thing is other stuff has been bungled.
And more stuff to come will be bungled.
And I just think you get to a tipping point where if they want to stay relevant, everybody wants to be relevant.
Um the key is we have to get, you know, the low information voters to clean their ears out, get the wax out, or get their earbuds out, and be primed and ready to hear this.
And I think the more bungling and the more experience they have with all these bad Obamacare policies that are gonna cost them a fortune, and the m you know, the more negative experiences they have, I think they're gonna be primed to listen.
And they're they're gonna they're gonna hear it.
Well, um I don't know, and I uh the reason that I'm doubtful is the reason that I concocted the limbaugh theorem to explain it, because using the belief system that you just touted, it should have happened by now.
We've got horrible economy, rotten jobs.
The bottom line is that I call the low information voters, that's who you're talking about, pop culture audience.
They don't associate Obama with any of this.
They blame the Republicans for it.
They really do.
And even now, the Republicans, the New York Times today is blaming the Republicans for Syria.
Obama blamed the Republicans for the red line on Syria just just last week.
And the media just runs with it.
The media doesn't question him.
He can say whatever he wants to say.
The people you're talking about are not going to get the information he's bungling anything.
Even if their lives are bungled royally, the the great the the great thing the the the very sad thing that's happening here is that what you say is happening.
People are losing faith, but not in Obama.
They're losing faith in America.
They think America's great days are gone, and they're feeling left out.
The young people think that they're not going to do as well or better than their parents, but it's not Obama's fault.
It's just they're lost, they've lost faith in the country.
They've lost faith in the ability of the country to provide for them.
And that's the way they look at it.
They've lost faith in the country to provide opportunity for.
They're living at home with their parents, but they don't blame the Democrat Party for any of it.
They don't blame Obama for it.
And and that's that's uh first time in in in my life that a president has remained insulated from the very results of his own policies.
It's never happened.
It is remarkable.
It is amazing.
Exact i I I totally get what you're saying, and it is completely amazing to me that the re the reality is of of what's going on is never attributed to him.
It is an absolutely remarkable it's a remarkable uh uh way of thinking.
It's like now, but let's go back to what you said when you when I first took your call.
Do you do you disagree?
Do you think that something is gonna happen that's gonna wake these people up?
I think if popular culture, the drivers of popular culture want to stay relevant, and they start uh uh using some of this stuff in Saturday Night Light Skits on the John Stewart show.
I think that's the beginning of people.
You know, we don't have to get people to say, oh, Obama is terrible and he's the reason that everything's bad, and he's I now get it, he's the reason my life is bad.
We just need to get them to say, maybe he's not all that great.
Maybe he's he is kinda weak.
Maybe he did.
We just have to plant the seed in there.
And I think the rest of it'll just by natural course.
Okay, but then what?
I mean, where he can't he's he can't run for re-election.
So what even if that were to happen, so what?
He's still gonna be president for the next uh three years and and he's not gonna have any opposition.
I mean, even if the Republicans hold the House, they're not opposing him now.
Why are they going to oppose him then?
The Republicans are afraid to oppose him, again, because of race.
So even if this happens, what the earliest opportunity for anything to be done to correct this is 2016.
And then, as uh Norman Padoritz wrote yesterday, he hi his opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal is our only hope is that Obama's successor is somebody, the same worldview that we're discussing here who can begin to implement change that reverses this headlong descent into destruction.
It's definitely step by step.
It's it's not a wholesale turn on a dime and turn around, which is what we need, but it is going to be a slow U-turn over the next three years.
I think but I I swear to the Again I look, I'm not trying to be I'm not I'm not trying to be negative.
I'm I'm trying to be realistic.
Even if what you say happens, and by the way, all for it.
I don't want anybody misunderstand.
There has to be an alternative for people.
Where is that successor Norman Pedoritz talks about going to come from?
The Republican Party.
The Republican Party is not opposing now.
The Republican Party is not drawing distinctions between it itself and the Democrats or Obama.
So you can have this dream of yours come true, where the Daily Show starts making fun of Obama and Letterman starts making fun of Obama.
And Saturday Night Live starts making fun of Obama.
And by the way, I don't think that those three are actually the key, but you do, so we'll stick with them.
Even if that happens, there isn't, if if there isn't somebody who then stands up and agrees with what all of these people that you hope happen someday start start distancing themselves from this, if there's no alternative, if there's no pushback, if there's nobody that stands up, or no political party of opposition, it gives an alternative to vote for to get this turned around, then it's moot anyway.
This is why I've I've kept I I'm totally puzzled where the Republican Party is, just within the realm of politics.
Okay, maybe they don't want to be conservative.
Fine.
Leave that for another day.
But at least they're not Democrats.
Why aren't they opposing the party?
Well, they oppose the Democrats without saying bad things about Obama because they're afraid to do that.
But they're not even, and there's been never any greater opportunity for a political party ever to oppose the Democrats.
Twenty years ago, 10 years ago, we could campaign on the basis of if these guys win, let me tell you what's going to happen because who they are.
No longer, we're not living the predic we're we're not, we don't have to predict anymore.
We're living it.
We're in the middle of the predictions made 15 years ago and 30 years ago and 15 years ago.
Things that I warned people about that would happen in America if liberals got control, they've they're happening now.
It's no longer what might happen, it's happening.
And so the opportunity to stand up and draw a distinction between us and it's never been better.
Because we don't have to convince people of what will happen.
It has happened.
The problem is, and it's very simple.
The problem is tying what has happened to the Democrat Party, which nobody seems to be trying to do.
That boggles my mind.
I gotta take a break.
Lisa, thanks very much.
I'm glad you called.
And uh I hope, I hope that what you think is going to happen does.
Don't misunderstand.
Ha, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh here on the cutting edge.
Here is uh Punit in San Jose, California.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hello, Rush.
It's an honor to speak with you.
Thank you.
I just wanted to vent my frustrations at the way that Barack Obama is constantly being propped up.
Already you can see that those in the statement media, they're working fiercely feverishly to turn it into his own Cuban missile crisis.
And those of those who know history know that JFK only got into that mess because he's so badly bonded at the initial meeting with Kusha.
No one remembers that.
You remember him managing his way through that crisis.
It's considered one of the highlights of his presidency.
Similarly, no one, no one's gonna remember that we only got in this mess because of his uh Obama's incompetence.
No one can remember that we only potentially get out of it because he stumbled across a solution just out of pure dumb luck, and know that she's gonna care if it's a real solution or not.
If he can get out of it and they can make him look at it, we'll get immediate blackout and anything that happens in Syria from here on out because the problem is solved.
Barack Obama through his brilliance solved this crisis, and and uh that's what we're gonna read about in the history of those 15, 20 years from now.
I think you're right.
And your your use of the JFK Cuban Missile Crisis is a great example, great illustration.
If I heard you correctly, you're uh uh you went by pretty quickly there, but I think let me summarize what you said, this so I know before I comment.
You said JFK, essentially what you said, JFK actually bungled the Cuban Missile Crisis, but the history books never ever said that.
He was he was lauded as a hero forever, and particularly after his assassination.
Gutsy, courageous, really took it to Khrushchev, and nobody knew in the general population how close we came to disaster and what we had to allow, what we actually gave up.
We gave up missile positions in Turkey and a bunch of things in exchange for the missiles uh never getting to Cuba and so forth.
And you're saying the same thing here.
This is a manufactured crisis.
Obama draws his red line last summer.
Then we have the threat and the supposed use of chemical weapons, we've got a video out there showing this.
We have this supposed crisis that Obama even says yesterday doesn't matter.
It doesn't affect us.
It's not affecting U.S. national security, but yet Obama today hailed as a great leader and is a great hero for averting a potential world disaster with chemical weapons and the history books are going to repeat this for who knows how long, and nobody's gonna know the truth in the general population, low information population, and it's it's gonna be the same same thing, media covering for him like they covered for JFK.
Is that basically your point?
Exactly, exactly.
But also just the fact that even the reason we got into the Cuban Missile Crisis to begin with was because JFK was seen at such a weak leader, Christian rolled over him.
That's the only reason that it even it the crisis even occurred is true.
So his own incompetence there, similarly here, we don't have to be even even be having this conversation if it wasn't for the fact that Obama is so incompetent that he created this problem.
So they're getting credit for managing their way through problems game, they felt created.
Well, uh I think I think that's exactly right.
It all boils down to the fact that Obama is just too big to fail.
He's too incompetent to fail.
It just can't be permitted.
It just won't.
And there are so many other factors or reasons why that is going to be the case.
And numero uno is a race.
And the left's view of it, and it's history in this country.
Can be summed up with the very apt description, the soft bigotry of low expectations.
And we are right smack dab in the middle of that.
Soft bigotry of low expectations.
And you know, the first media sounds about we played today is a great indication of how they'll circle the wagons, and they always have.
There's nothing new.
Now, let me address something.
By the way, Poonette, thanks for the call.
I I um I appreciate it.
I know all this sounds depressing.
Uh because it just doesn't seem right.
I mean, in a just sense, or in uh in a in a moral sense, it doesn't seem right that bad guys get away with it, that the incompetent get away with it, that whoever circles the wagons protects the bad guys.
The country suffers the consequences.
It just doesn't seem right.
Okay, what?
What's gonna happen to meet out justice here?
These people don't deserve this kind of credit.
They don't deserve this kind of success.
They don't deserve this kind of treatment.
They don't deserve these accolades.
They're incompetent, they're boobs, they're destroying elements of this country that defined its greatness, the traditions, the institution, they botching health care.
Botch immigration.
Uh you know, uh sit and wonder where's the justice in this?
Where does it where does it even out at some point?
And the answer, those these things don't just happen.
You can't sit around and wait and hope something happens.
Now, sometimes life takes unexpected turns.
I mean, things do happen, but it's not it's not a policy.
You have to try to make things happen, And that's all about educating people, informing people, working on them.
And it's it's it's tough.
It's hard.
It's very easy to be ignorant.
It's blissful sometimes.
Uh and most ignorant people don't know that they are.
And don't want to admit that they are.
And I'm not saying stupid, I'm saying ignorant.
We just really don't know.
It takes a a never give up attitude about it.
And I know it's it's tough, but the more people talk about it and the more people are made aware of it.
I think I think actually the table is set.
I think a large number of Americans just isn't right.
Well, they may not be able to put their finger on it, but this isn't right.
Healthcare ought to not be the way it is.
This this just isn't right.
There ought to I ought to be able to get a job that pays me some for crying out loud.
This is the United States of America.
All of this, the table is set.
People are are primed, I think, for explanations that persuade them.
I gotta take a break.
I just noticed the clock.
Sit tight, my friends.
We'll be back with much more.
Don't go away.
By the way, Jay Leno, just so you know, who's got the highest late night ratings of any of the 1130 p.m. shows, has been making fun of Obama for months.
Obama jokes left and right.
They've been good.
And they're occurring in an echo chamber.
And of course, Leno's, he's gotta go.
We gotta replace Leno.
We can't have limo.
▲
Export Selection