All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 27, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
August 27, 2013, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, folks.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh and the EIB network.
The Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
And the latest opinion audit from the Sullivan Group is not in.
Well, because I have some documents I have to sign.
The Sullivan Group is once again changed affiliations with something that has nothing to do with the opinion auditing firm, and I haven't signed the latest documents, and they're withholding the opinion audit from me.
I pay the fees, I do everything, but I just haven't signed the documents, and so they're withholding uh uh uh latest audit of my opinions.
All we've got to go on, and I'm assuming it hasn't changed, is documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time.
All right, I'm sure we're gonna get back to uh Syria and uh anti-Iraq.
Hasn't have the what been the Limbaugh theorem been tallied into the I that's what I'm no the Limbaugh theorem, well, not the last two months of it, the last two months of the Limbo theorem could possibly go up.
But you gotta be you gotta be right 100% of the time for a long time to move up when you're at 99.7.
I mean, go from 99.7, 99.8, you've got to be right for a year.
You know, it gets it it's it's it's tight once you get this close to perfection.
Anyway, I'm sure we're gonna get back to Syria.
But but I just I got a note from somebody.
Let me run this by you and see what you think.
Rush, I think you are making a mistake in calling out Obama on his hypocrisy or the contradiction things based on what Obama said about Bush and Iraq and what Kerry said about Bush and Iraq versus what they're doing and saying now.
Rush, the correct thing is that Obama has finally learned the way the world works.
And I'm I don't I'm not that charitable.
I think Obama knew exactly what he was doing in 2002 and 2004 and 5 and 6.
And I think he knew how the world worked.
I I find it I find it difficult to believe that Obama is just now.
See, I don't buy this incompetence bit.
Uh foreign policy or otherwise with Obama at all.
And I don't I I don't think that in 2002 and 2004 when he was accusing Bush of lying and when he's accusing Bush of uh going into Iraq as a distraction and so forth.
Uh hard for me to accept that Obama really believed all that back then.
It was not just being politically in opposition.
Anyway, I'm sure we'll get back to that as the program unfolds.
But this Miley Cyrus incident from Sunday night twerking uh on the MTV music awards continues to be discussed.
And I ran across something today I really want to share with you about the curriculum at many, one particularly, but I'm sure at many other universities and colleges in this country, which have been the curriculum has been co-opted by the radical feminists for a long time.
It is one of the reasons male enrollment at universities is way down.
Uh and it is also explanatory in certain ways about what kind of women the way they think and act are being graduated from these universities.
It really is amazing.
Now to set it up, I want to do some audio sound bites.
The first two are just for the fun of it.
The last two will set up actually what's coming here.
I want to start Eric Bowling on the five on Fox yesterday afternoon during a discussion of uh Miley Cyrus performance.
Eric Bowling said this.
Russia's right.
He says border's pornography.
I think it was.
I mean, she literally does some stuff with that foam finger right there that you don't want to see.
You don't want your kids to see.
I'm surprised MTV let that air.
Surprised they let it air.
MTV's repeating it.
Surprised they let it air.
That's the whole point.
This aired on purpose.
They knew what was coming.
That thing was choreographed.
There wasn't anybody in that production that didn't know that that bit, that routine, was not coming.
Or didn't know it was coming.
Here's Bob Beckle.
Bob Beckle wanted to weigh in on this.
He had a different way of defining it.
You know what that is?
That was his cheerleading squad for hookers.
That's exactly what that thing was.
Cheerleading squad for hookers.
Now we go to the today show.
And the today show's guests today are Mika Brzezinski from the Morning Joe Show on MSNBC and Nancy Snyderman, the chief medical correspondent for NBC News, and the TV personality Star Jones.
And they're talking about the Miley Cyrus performance.
Matt Wauer said to these uh three women, parents groups are saying somebody at MTV needs to be fired.
Absolutely.
Somebody should be fired.
It's hard to believe they're burnt parents at MTV who couldn't have put two and two in two together.
But did we expect this?
There's raunchy corn that's disgusting and disturbing.
And seeing a young girl, a 20-year-old young woman, literally in the process of her undoing and everyone clapping for it and being disturbed by it and talking about it and showing it, which I hope we don't.
I don't want to see it.
Don't show it here on my segment, please, here with you guys.
Please don't show it.
It was Mika Brzezinski at the beginning and the end of the bite saying somebody should be fired, absolutely, and don't show it here on my segment here, please with you guys, please don't show it.
I don't want to see it.
I'm for real.
That's Mika Bzezinski.
This is what sets up what's coming.
These are the people.
How do I say this?
Very judicious here.
Let me ask why all of a sudden is it okay to be judgmental on this kind of stuff?
Maybe that's that's the right.
You know, I love to expose this stuff by way of questions.
I thought it was judgmental.
I thought we didn't have the right to judge somebody else's morality, and I thought we didn't have a run that thought this was art.
It was performance art.
I thought we were supposed to see the beauty and the innovation and the creativity, just like we were supposed to see it when Karen Finley lathered chocolate all over her nude body on stage, prominent arenas and so forth with an NEA grant, or Andre Serrano and his famous work of art, piss I can't even say it, the crucifix in a jar of urine.
Um does this upset these progressive women.
These are the women who send as many other women to planned parenthood as they can lasso in Roundup.
These are the same women who have no problem with pro-choice actually meaning what it means.
They have no problem with 1.7 million death uh sorry abortions a year.
But this has their backs up.
What, because their daughters used to watch Hannah Montana?
And that's why they're so because their daughters are watching Hannah Montana go pro and get paid for it, that's what they find offensive.
So if if that had been, let's see, let's say Beyonce had done that, would they not be upset?
Beyonce was never Hannah Montana.
Let's say it was Beyoncé and Jay-Z up there doing that instead of Alan Thick and Miley Cyrus.
Would they still be upset?
You know, it is an interesting question.
Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, though.
Why all of a sudden is it okay for these women to be judgmental?
I thought we weren't supposed to do fired?
Somebody is supposed to lose their job at MTV.
Why, who do these people think they are?
Tipper Gore.
What do they think they're running the uh the parental advisory council for Hollywood content?
Who do they think they are?
Robin Thick.
I can't have Robin thick, Robin Thick, Alan Thick.
I mean, they're clones, right?
One's father, one's son, but they're clones.
Just look at the hair.
It's all you need to look at.
You see it so Robin Thick, by the way, does this guy need to get noticed or what?
Is a career in that bad shape?
Do you need to do this to get noticed?
Just an aside.
No, really.
When did it become okay to be this judgmental of performance?
When did it become okay to demand that MTV somebody be fired?
Now, that was just one bit.
Here now is Star Jones and Mika Brzezinski again.
This is on the Today Show as they continue their shock and outrage at the oversexualization of young girls as though this just happened.
The over-sexualization of young, they're they're just now learning about this.
As you said, they've got daughters.
They're just now outraged by this.
Something really curious going on.
No one disagrees that it was really ratchet.
But I think it speaks more to young women thinking that being oversexualized is a way to be seen and to be heard.
Over sexualized as one thing.
Is it sexual to stick your face in the back of a life-size teddy bear and stick your tongue out?
We're talking about raunch.
That was Mika Brzezinski there on the tail end in Star Jones at the front end.
Talking about raunch.
Clearly was, but this is by no means the first example of this kind of raunch.
And near pornography.
Anyway, I'm going to take a brief time out when we come back.
Uh a I don't know how to describe this.
There's a the only tenured professor, conservative professor, in the University of North Carolina system, was attacked by a fellow professor because he dared say that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Another professor, a guy by the name of Ed, don't know his last name, really launched a salvo on the tenured conservative professor.
And the tenured conservative press professor wrote back, and that letter has been published on a website.
And I want to read that letter to you because it details nine outrageous things being taught to women that make what this thing with Miley Cyrus was look like romper room.
Sit tight.
Coming back in a momento.
You know, I'm about to lose my mind trying to figure out why this is not working, and it's driving me crazy.
It is, it's becoming a distraction.
And I can't even tell you what it is.
Maybe I will.
But I just it just I know it's beta, but it's working on one of the others.
Why not working on that?
I want to find out what triggers it.
Sorry.
Now the website where I found this is called Clash Daily.
An embarrassment to higher education.
Clash Daily.
It's uh Doug Giles, I think if I remember right, is the guy that runs the site.
And on his site is a letter from Mike Adams.
This letter is a total slapdown of the feminazis who have taken over the university system, not only in North Carolina, but all over America.
And if you wonder why or how a very young woman could think it was acceptable to act out sex on national TV, you really don't have to look any further than what is going on in the classrooms of several hallowed American universities.
Now, Mike Adams, who wrote the letter I'm going to read excerpts from.
Mike Adams is a lone conservative tenured professor in the University of North Carolina system.
He is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina.
And he has the audacity to be outspoken on the definition of marriage, as that being a union between a man and a woman.
This has caused controversy out the wazoo Throughout the University of North Carolina system.
And he ended up getting a very nasty email from another professor named Ed, I don't have the guy's last name, doesn't matter.
The letter said the professor said that Mike Adams was an embarrassment to higher education because of his definition of marriage.
So Adams took that as a I guess is an opportunity to fight back with his own words.
And as you read this letters, I as I read this letter to you that Mike Adams wrote this.
Remember what this is about now.
Mike Adams, the only tenured conservative professor at the University of North Carolina system, simply said that marriage is a union between a man and a woman.
And that caused anger and outrage and demands that he be fired.
So he wrote back to the professor that caused all the grief.
And when you read this, you'll find out that this professor who criticized Adams is the real embarrassment to higher education.
Dear Edward, it begins, I want to take the time to thank you for writing and telling me that I should be fired from my position as a tenured professor because I am the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America, as you said.
I also want to thank you for responding when I ask you exactly how you arrived at that conclusion.
Your response, quote, because you insist that marriage requires one man and one woman.
That was helpful and concise, Ed.
Now, while I respect your right to conclude that I'm the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America, I think you're wrong.
In fact, I don't even think I'm the biggest embarrassment to higher education in the state of North Carolina, but since you're a liberal and you support choice, provided we're talking about dismembering children and not school vouchers for those who weren't dismembered.
I want to give you some options, Ed.
In fact, I'm going to describe the antics of ten professors, official, campus groups, and invited campus speakers in North Carolina and let you decide which constitutes the biggest embarrassment to higher education.
Number one, in the early spring semester of 2013, a women's studies professor and a psychology professor at Western Carolina University co-sponsored a panel on bondage and SM.
The purpose of the panel was to teach college students how to inflict pain on themselves and others for sexual pleasure.
When you called me the biggest embarrassment in higher education, Ed, you must not have known about their bondage panel.
Maybe you were tied up that evening, couldn't make it.
Number two, at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, there's a feminist professor who believed that women can lead happy lives without men.
Now that's nothing new.
But what's different, Ed, is that she thinks women can form lifelong domestic partnerships with dogs, and that those relationships will actually be fulfilling enough to replace marital relationships with men.
She's teaching this stuff, Ed.
I can't make it up.
I don't drop acid.
Well, at least not since the late 80s, but I promise this story is real.
Number three, at Duke University, feminists hired a sex worker, i.e.
prostitute, to speak as part of an event called Sex Workers Art Show.
After his speech, the male prostitute pulled down his pants, got down on his knees, and inserted a burning sparkler into his rectum.
While it burned, he sang a verse of a Star Spangled Banner.
I believe that stripping incident was almost as embarrassing as the other one involving the Duke Lacrosse team, Ed.
Each of these incidents actually happened and are taught.
Remember now this guy was threatened with being fired to suggest that he be fired because he says marriage is that between a man and a woman.
Number four, a porn star, was once paid to give a speech At the University of North Carolina.
The topic was safe sodomy.
And after her speech, the feminist pornographer sold autographed butt plugs to students in attendance.
I'm not sure whether the ink could contribute to rectal cancer.
I'm no health expert, but I do know, Ed, that it was pretty darn embarrassing when the media picked up that story.
Number five.
A few years ago at North Carolina Chapel Hill, a feminist group built a large vibrator museum in the middle of the campus quad as part of their orgasm awareness week.
Now, Ed, I think that was probably the climax of the semester, academically speaking, but they certainly weren't too embarrassed to display a vibrator made out of wood back in the 1920s.
Keep your batteries charged, Ed.
We're about halfway done here.
Number six.
A feminist administrator, UNC Wilmington, sponsored a pro abortion event.
During the event, they sold t-shirts saying I had an abortion to students who had had abortions.
That's right, Ed.
The students were encouraged to brag about the fact that they had killed their own kids.
That's how the University of North Carolina system is preserving the future of our great Tarheel state.
The following semester, the same administrator sponsored a workshop teaching students how to appreciate their orgasms.
I learned art appreciation in college, Ed.
Today college kids are taught orgasm appreciation.
I'll let you decide whether that's an embarrassment to higher education, Ed.
Now that's seven of them.
There are two more to go.
But this is the stuff, and it's this is not just at University of North Carolina.
This stuff is common and happens in many places where the feminists have taken over the curriculum.
Folks, I apologize if everything sounds helterskelter today.
I hope it doesn't, but I've got 13,000 things coming at me every commercial break I'm trying to deal with here.
And so I hope this is sounding somewhat uh organized.
It does to me.
I want to tell you who who Mike Adams is.
In addition to being the only tenured conservative presser professor at the University of North Carolina, the whole system, a criminology professor.
He's at Wilmington.
He is the author of a book called Letters to a Young Progressive.
How to avoid wasting your life protesting things that you don't understand.
Now, these things that he is citing in this letter to this bigoted professor Ed who wanted him fired.
Because of his definition of marriage, he says marriage must require a man and a woman.
That's uh just what it is.
And that represented the biggest embarrassment ever to the whole UN University of North Carolina system, UNC system.
So he wrote back, I want you to keep in mind, North Carolina is a red state in all of this deranged liberalism is taking place on campus there.
It's even worse in other university systems.
And this is just North Carolina.
Probably doesn't have that many colleges.
It's a red state.
Now here are the other two examples that he cited.
A few years ago, a UNC English professor posted nude pictures of underage girls as a part of an art exhibit at the university library.
The provost then ordered the nude pictures to be moved away from the library and into the university union.
Not taken down, moved.
This decision was made after several pedophiles had previously been caught downloading child pornography in the university library, just a few yards away from the location of this display.
The English professor was incensed, so she asked the faculty senate to censure the provost for violating her academic freedom.
The faculty Senate sided with the feminist professor, the provost was later pressured to leave the university.
Let me run through that one again.
A UNC English professor posted nude pictures of underage girls as an art exhibit in the university library.
The provost ordered the pictures to be moved into the university union, away from the library, not taken down, just moved.
This decision was made after several pedophiles had previously been caught downloading child porn in the university library, just a few yards away from the display of nude pictures of underaged girls.
The English professor who had posted the nude photos of the underage girls was mad.
So she asked the faculty senate to censure the provost for violating her academic freedom because she had academic freedom to post to post nude photos of underage girls in the library as an art exhibit.
And the faculty sided with her.
And the provost was pressured to leave the university.
The ninth little factoid referenced in Mike Adams'letter, a different feminist professor at the University of North Carolina, Wilmington, accused a male professor of putting tear gas in her office.
She was later caught putting her mail in a microwave oven.
She did this because she thought people were trying to poison her with anthrax and that the oven would neutralize the toxins.
She was not placed on leave for psychiatric reasons.
Instead, she was designated the university's official counter-terrorism expert.
And then there's Mike Adams.
He thinks marriage is between a man and a woman, and he is the biggest embarrassment on campus.
So those are the choices, Ed, you can simply write back and tell me which of these professors, groups or guest speakers has caused the biggest embarrassment to higher education.
Now, my point in going through all of this is that Mika Bzzynski and Star Jones and Nancy Snyderman, I would have to imagine are totally supportive of the feminist curriculum at all these institutions of higher learning, whether they know what's in it or not.
This kind of stuff is routine.
It happens as a matter of course.
And so when you have Miley Cyrus going through her near porn act, to some people it's it's not unusual to say the least, or strange at all.
And some people are sitting around saying, what is the big deal?
Because this is what many young women are taught.
This is the kind of thing that they are exposed to, to expand their feminist horizons and so forth.
Not every woman, of course, not every female student, but the feminist curriculum is what it is, and the and the women that sign up and take this stuff become radicalized more often than not.
I don't think Miley Cyrus went to school.
That's not that's not my point.
That's a whole different thing why she did it, but the reaction to it.
Here Washington Post, guy named Clinton Yates.
Miley Cyrus and the issues of slut shaming and racial condescension.
Wow, this ought to be good.
Miley Cyrus is America's worst nightmare.
Last night when her performance at the MTV Video Music Awards, she proved that many people in this country are still preoccupied with slut shaming and coded racial condescension in the context of entertainment.
Her performance of We Can't Stop is clearly the most talked about moment of the show, but for all the wrong reasons.
Her body performance that featured Miley and other dancers twerking on stage drew criticism as lewd, grotesque, and shameful.
Mika Brzezinski of M SNBC went so far as to say that Cyrus is obviously deeply troubled, deeply disturbed, clearly has confidence issues, probably an eating disorder.
But what is so disturbing about Miley Cyrus?
It seems that we still can't handle what it's like for a young woman to be able to perform as she chooses without layering in a heavy helping of insults.
While Cyrus was condemned for grinding on thick, very little criticism has been laid on the singer himself for his role in the performance.
The nastiest of the comments have implied that Cyrus has somehow diseased because of her preferred dance methods.
When the white 20-year-old former child star and daughter of a country singer goes on stage and does something that the so-called ruling classes deem unseemly.
It starts a firestorm.
When scores of young women across the globe take the stage to express themselves in exactly the same way at an EDM concert by Diplo and plaster their exploits all over social networks, no one bats an eye.
And by the way, I it should be pointed out that in hip hop music videos, this has been going on for a long, long time.
Nobody says a word about it.
But it hasn't also been seen at the MTV music awards.
And so the question if Beyoncé had done this with Jay-Z, what would the reaction have been?
Here's uh here's I guess that's Laura in Orlando, Florida.
Hi, Laura, welcome to EIB Network.
Great to have you.
Oh, I am starstruck.
It's a pleasure and a privilege to talk to you.
I I had said to the gentleman who took a call that it was just a few months ago, Beyoncé and J Lo both did this, and the event that they were having was a world event about women's rights.
There were women in the audience who had headscarves on holding their phones up.
I looked at my husband and said, this is what the best we can do to show that we've gone through all these struggles so that I can crawl on all floors across the stage and hunch like a dog.
They both did it, but no one said a word.
It's ridiculous.
You report yourself.
This is what we're getting.
Well, uh, you know, I've I remember seeing photos of Beyonce scantily clad like Miley Cyrus was uh in uh in some performances.
But you you raise a um a good point that it happened, but nobody criticized it then.
It was it was it was uh said to be great performance art because it was Beyonce doing it.
Beyonce can't do anything wrong.
I think Beyoncé might have even coined the term twerk.
Um not sure about that, but it's uh it it's entirely possible.
Anyway, I look at here's what about this that is interesting to me.
It clearly was just this side of porn.
There's no question about it.
Now the guy in the Washington Post does raise a good point that nobody is talking about Robin Thick's involvement, but there's an explanation for that.
And I I don't I don't want to embarrass him by explaining that.
She was the focus of it, which was the intention.
I just I find it I don't I don't know what, I don't know how to describe it.
Just to listen to all these progressive women who's ideology, whose feminism promotes this kind of stuff in young women is the bottom line.
All of this permissiveness, do whatever you want to do, and we can't judge anybody's morality, it leads to this, and then all of a sudden they express outrage over it.
And is it simply because their daughters watched Hannah Montana, and they can't believe that this is what Hannah Montana has become?
Remember Hannah Montana was clean and pure as the wind driven snow, right?
Well, at one time Madonna was somebody's cute little girl too.
Every woman is somebody's cute little girl at some point.
But with the you know, the this this feminism stuff, folks, it hasn't gone away.
It's taken root on campus, and it is radical.
And it is based in in in what most people would classify as sexual perversion.
It's rooted in that.
And the and the feminist leadership that sponsors such things, they have their own issues that motivate them and inspire them.
And they're enraged to begin with, and they're angry to begin with.
They're unhappy to begin with.
And it's a true mess.
And every day we keep thinking at some point we're going to reach the bottom.
At some point we're all going to recognize we're in the gutter and say this is low enough.
And we haven't gotten there.
Now the reaction to Miley Cyrus from so many different circles of life is intriguing to me.
The women that I thought would be standing up and defending her right to do it and telling all of us to stop being Neanderthals and get with it and understand what performance art is, are the ones standing up the loudest and ripping it to shreds.
Feminists.
Women who proudly think of themselves as independent, don't need a man for any reason whatsoever, don't need a relationship for any reason whatsoever.
Sperm bank is all you need, and a dog are the ones who are upset about it.
Not a cat.
It's got to be a dog.
It's got to be a dog.
Do who?
Miley Sy.
Do I think she's being did all do the upset feminazis think that she's being subservient to men by doing this?
It's interesting question.
In other words, why are they so upset about this?
What is the real reason they're upset about this?
Because they're the ones who told us little girls are going to have sex, can't stop it.
So introduce them to Planned Parenthood, introduce them to condoms, introduce them to cigarettes afterwards on the nightstand, introduce them to rooms in your house instead of the backseat of the car.
Yeah.
Why are they upset about it?
Interesting question.
Unfortunately, we're going to have to delay our investigation of that because it's an obscene profit break time, so we gotta go.
Would these ruling class aerodite uh elite women be as upset if Miley Cyrus had twerked with another woman instead of Robin Thick.
It would not be an issue.
I'll bet I'll bet you a dollar, and I have a few of those, that it would not be an issue.
You think so?
Obama might have called Miley to praise her for her heroism had she twerked with another girl.
Woman, woman, sorry.
Here's uh here's Randy Temecula, California.
Hi, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Rush, thank you for taking my call, buddy.
Hey, say, um the reason for my call is because um what I see uh this country and the uh majority of the American voters is that uh the Democrat Party can put any moron up there for president, and America's gonna vote for them.
Um I I'm worried, Rush, and I I just I'm not sure what what how we could combat this, what do we need to do?
Um, long term.
I think short term it's not gonna turn around.
It's gonna stay the same.
I think America's gonna still be the majority of American voters are gonna be uh people on the take.
And you know, what do we do, Rush?
I think we nominate Miley Cyrus.
She can help in rebranding the party, she can call attention to the party, she can make us uh look progressive, uh, well, by progressive, I mean advanced.
I don't mean progressive as in liberal.
Uh make us look tolerant, hip, uh what if not nominator, have her as the official performance on the night that our candidate is nominated, or maybe the night before.
Uh I I don't know uh I don't know which.
Anyway, seriously, Randy, your call's kind of a little bit out of place here.
I'm sorry.
Um in terms of uh what the Republican Party can do in terms of a nominee.
The Democrats can't put any more on up and win.
I know what you mean by that, but they can't.
Uh it they they need a whole lot of things to align, uh, and they can generally ensure that those things do align.
But the the mistake that everybody's making here is that they're invincible.
And that's what I tried to make the point yesterday.
I am a lot of Democrats, well, not a lot, but a sizable number privately told me.
Folks, they're worried about things.
They're not in Fat City like you might think they are, or like you would think you would be if you were in their shoes right now.
I gotta take a time out.
Don't go away.
Back after this.
I don't know where the time is going, folks.
It's just zipping by.
But I've got a we've got still got an hour to go, and you sit tight, because I've got lots of stuff.
You know, either some stuff from yesterday I didn't even get to that I'm I might want to touch on.
So we we're still loaded as we commence the third hour.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection