All Episodes
Previous Next
June 19, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:12
June 19, 2013, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, you're watching a little bit of Obama in a speech at the Brandenburg Gate.
200,000 people showed up for an Obama's speech in 2008.
6,000 a day.
Fox has a side-by-side comparison comparison to the crowd size.
That's not 6,000 people there today.
What are they telling us?
There's no way that's 6,000.
That's not even a minor league hockey game crowd.
Anyway, um, I didn't hear it, but supposedly the end of Obama's speech today at the Brandenburg Gate, kind of.
No Pizazz, and Chris Matthews, the sycophantic thrill up the leg, Obamaite, said that it was because the sun, the setting sun was obscuring Obama's prompter, and he wasn't able to see the words on the prompter.
And without the prompter, he doesn't know what he's saying, apparently.
Well, what else is there to conclude?
Well, we know the real reason he's on prompter.
They got to make sure he doesn't drift offward and reveal what's really in his mind.
Anyway, great to have you back, folks, Rush Limbaugh, EIB Network, Limbaugh Institute, Advanced Conservative Studies.
You may have heard me mention.
Catherine and I took a vacation recently, and as part of it, we went to visit Normandy.
Omaha Beach, Juan Duhock, Bonduho, pronounced both ways.
We stood on the beach where so many incredible American troops acted in bravery that is incomprehensible to the average person, all in the name of freedom.
In the name of freedom for people of other countries, in addition to their own, and ours.
And then we walk through the American cemetery in Normandy.
Over 10,000 white crosses, the names of American young people.
In in a in an unreal, perfect geometric order.
I mean, it was really moving, folks.
It was phenomenally sobering and moving.
And the older I get, the more awstruck I am by people who do what they do.
Now many of you in this audience are military, former military.
And to us, you are heroes.
You are true eternal heroes.
And those of us in this audience, people I can speak for, we are eternally grateful for what you and your families have sacrificed for this country.
Our little small business, two if by tea, is a proud sponsor of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
This is a great organization, tremendous work.
They provide scholarships and financial support to the children of military personnel lost in combat or in other tragedies, such as 9-11.
It's been around since the mid-90s.
I was present in the living room when the idea came together and the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation was born.
And our goal when we when we launched 2F by T two years ago this week, this is our little birthday that we're celebrating here.
Our goal was to experience firsthand all of the rules, all the regulations, all of the obstacles that American small business people face.
All the paperwork, all of the requirements your people are required to produce from scratch in this country just to start a business.
And we wanted to create jobs.
We wanted to work with American companies, and of course, raise awareness about the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
And we know that many of you out there are small business owners, and we even have a greater appreciation for what you do.
We're one of you now.
And we applaud you.
And so we are celebrating our second birthday, second anniversary at 2 if by T. of course, our icon is me, Rush Revere.
And that's in honor of our good buddy Paul Revere rode through the streets of Boston prior to American independence, 1776.
So we're starting here at 2F by T, our greatest, what we think is our greatest sweepstakes yet.
Here's the deal, folks, right now, from right this minute, right this minute through Friday at 11.59 p.m. Pacific time, you could be the grand prize winner that drives away with a brand new Jeep Patriot.
How perfect is that?
I'll repeat the grand prize winner gets a fully equipped all weather drive Jeep Patriot SUV.
The 2013 Jeep Patriot is a perfect way to celebrate all the Patriots that helped create the United States and sustained it.
It's uh it's a beautiful SUV.
It's got eye-catching strong in the exterior, beautifully laid out, tasteful, comfortable interior.
We wouldn't do anything less.
Your next adventure could be in total style.
Now, all the official rules, all the pictures of the Jeep Patriot, the pictures of previous winners are posted at our website, 2F by T.com.
And all you have to do to be entered to win is very simple.
You just have to shop at 2F by T.com right now through Friday at 11 59 p.m.
Pacific.
What are you buying?
Very simple.
Very uncomplicated.
You are buying the best iced tea, we think in the country.
Whatever flavor you got, however you have it sweetened, even if you want unsweetened, if you just want regular tea, you won't find any better.
And we ship it to you El Fribo.
We even absorb that in our effort to get it to you.
Now we also know the gasoline prices are high.
So in addition to the Jeep Patriot, the grand prize winner is going to get a check worth $1,500 to cover some of your gasoline or your insurance.
But fear not, there are also incredible first and second place prizes that include the most tender steaks, hamburgers, and jumbo hot dogs in this country from Allen Brothers.
Most contests would offer you Allen Brothers as the big prize.
In our case, it's a second place prize, and you can't do better than that.
The first place winner gets $1,500 worth of Allen Brothers in addition to the $1,500 check for gasoline insurance, in addition to the Jeep Patriot SUV.
It's a lot of barbecues.
It's the big kahuna sweepstakes, the best vehicle, the best Allen Brothers steaks, the best iced tea in America.
Keep in mind all prizes, including the Jeep Patriot can be gifted to a person or a friend or family member of your choice if you don't happen to want it or need it.
You can even give the Jeep Patriot to a military family if you choose to do so.
Catherine and I can't wait to call and personally let whoever the winner is know that they have won.
This is uh that's one of our favorite things to do.
Call the winners.
Listen to how unbelieving they are.
They never believe it's us.
Then they get all excited.
It's just priceless.
All you have to do, folks, to enter go to 2ifyt.com right now through Friday at 11.59 p.m. Pacific Time shop, and you are registered.
That's it.
The Jeep Patriot Allen Brothers stakes, 1,500 bucks cash, 1,500 bucks worth of Allen Brothers.
I mean, it's just to die for.
2FByT.com, everything explained there.
New Jersey lawmakers have approved a bill that would allow those in the country illegally.
This is an AP story.
New Jersey lawmakers have approved a bill that would allow those in the country illegally to qualify for in-state tuition rates at state colleges and universities.
Dozens of students or students, as some people say.
Dozens of students and supporters clapped when the measure was passed on Monday.
If it becomes law, it would take effect for the fall semester.
So compare and contrast here.
The New Jersey legislation wants to start using taxpayers' dollars to subsidize college tuition for students who are in the country illegally.
By the way, I've heard people, Rush, you know, you need to stop using that word illegal.
It just is too stigmatizing.
And it's one of the reasons why Hispanics don't like Republicans.
It's because they're always talking about illegals.
Um what what would snurly what would be a substitute?
Undocumented.
Undocumented, they don't like aliens either, because that that connotes big-eyed monsters from Mars.
Undocumented wannabe citizens.
Undocumented, but though they said they don't like this illegals.
You guys keep talking about illegals.
And we're see the problem, you can't do that, we're losing a language.
But at any rate, what's happening here is that the state of New Jersey is going to start using taxpayer dollars to subsidize college tuition for students who are in the country ill-alienly.
Illalienally.
And meanwhile, a judge in New Hampshire says that it is unconstitutional to let a private organization give scholarships to schools, but he's going to let it continue as long as the money doesn't go to any religious schools.
Isn't that discrimination based on religion?
Besides, we're still supposed to believe a judge won't be found to give these newly legalized ill aliens government benefits and such other perks.
So while all the gang eight stuff is going on, the states are doing their own things to uh to advance the uh the cause.
By the way, folks, I should put the Jeep Patriot has freedom drive.
Does that not seem fitting?
The Jeep Patriots that somebody in our audience is going to win big has something called freedom drive.
is to drive for.
To drive for.
Undocumented Democrats, I think, is what we need to call them.
Okay.
Undocumented Democrats.
Because that's what we're talking about.
Brief time out.
We'll be back and continue after this.
Okay, we're back.
We mob on Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
Do you want to know how taxes are raised in a surreptitious way?
I doubt that if somebody came out and said we need to raise income taxes, it would get much support right now.
Everybody's overtaxed.
Just had an income tax rate increase thanks to Obamacare's.
I know, Obama ending the Bush tax rates.
The House of Representatives is scheduled to consider on Tuesday.
A bipartisan bill to add new seasonal flu vaccines to the IRS definition of taxable vaccines.
The Senate has already reached an agreement to vote on its version of the bill without further debate.
If the House passes an identical version.
Now, if all of this happens, all new flu vaccines would become subject to the 75 cents per dose vaccine tax, and also become eligible to be included in the vaccine injury compensation program.
A summary of the bill provided by the House Republican Conference explains this.
The vaccine injury compensation program is a federal program designed for trial lawyers as a no-fault alternative to traditional tort law for resolving vaccine injury claims arising from covered vaccines.
The program is funded through a 75 cent excise tax on each dose of specified vaccines.
Now there is a there's already one of these uh vaccine injury compensation programs.
This would just be added to it.
The current balance in the vaccine injury compensation program as of May was about $3.4 billion.
The fund has paid out only $2.7 billion since it was established in 1988 for cases involving all vaccines.
About 17% of those cases involved a flu vaccine.
So at that payout rate, the $3.4 billion balance could last another 25 years with no new revenue.
It isn't needed.
We have plenty of money in this fund to cover whatever the hell we're covering here.
However, in response to initial reports on the legislation in April, Julia Lawless, a GOP press secretary, U.S. Senate Finance Committee issued a statement saying, first off, the Joint Committee on Taxation is clear that this bill is not a tax increase.
Right.
It's not a tax increase.
Just we're going to increase the tax by 75%.
The fee or the uh what have you.
Obamacare.
Listen to this.
I have mentioned several times.
My belief that the bureaucracy involved in Obamacare is unsupportable.
I believe that the system is incapable of doing what it is supposed to do.
I think it's too massive, it's unmanageable, it's unfundable.
There is not going to be one person who knows what to do.
There isn't going to be a final authority with the answers to whatever questions that come up.
This thing is going to be an absolute disaster.
Much like I think the Gang 8 bill is a disaster on substance.
This Obamacare bill cannot possibly function.
It's just too unwieldy.
It's too big, it's too massive, its tentacles just go into too many hidden crevices in our society and culture.
And I don't know how this thing is ultimately going to be run.
And I think that may be by design.
I think the whole bit of confusion and the chaos and just the panic that is sure to be part of this is going to lead people to ask for something simpler.
And the something simpler is going to be something that sounds simpler, like, well, how about we just do single payer?
How about the government just run it?
You know, early conservative thinkers knew exactly what was going to happen as government grew.
They knew Edmund Burke, Toqueville, they all spelled it out.
The bigger government gets, the more efficient government gets.
The only place you can go for remedy is government.
There isn't a private sector place to go to administer this mess to fix it, to clean it up.
You have to go back to government to ask them to fix what's wrong in the first place.
And but the process, government grows and grows and grows and becomes unaccountable, unmanageable, unaffordable.
And that's exactly what this is.
Now, here are the details.
This is this is uh a column in the Wall Street Journal by Holman Jenkins.
Very simple.
There have there's plenty of research data on this.
Healthy adults spend an average of $854 a year on health care.
And most of those are young adults because young people are the healthiest.
Average healthy people today spend on average $854 a year.
Obamacare is going to mandate that they buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800.
These people are going to figure out pretty quickly that they are not paying for their health care.
They are subsidizing all kinds of health care for all kinds of other people.
You go into a store, you want to buy an iPhone, the iPhone costs $200 with a two-year contract, and you pay it.
Then you find out that next year the iPhone is going to cost $1,500.
Nothing changes.
Your service stays the same.
Your contract stays the same.
The phone hasn't changed, but all of a sudden the phone's going to cost $1,500.
And the reason given, well, not everybody can afford a phone.
And so we're charging you an additional $1,300 so other people can have a phone.
Well, why should I pay for other people to have a phone?
Well, because it's an emergency device.
Everybody needs a telephone.
In the case of health care, it's a right.
In the case of health care, it's a right.
So basically what's going to happen here is that people believe me, they are aware of what they're spending on health care.
And when they are told that their costs are going to go up what?
Five $854 to $5,800.
I mean, that's serious.
Mandated.
That's what all the IRS agents are for, is to make sure that that's either paid or the fine is now the fine's going to be cheaper than that for a while.
Young, healthy adults spend an average of $854 a year on health care.
Obamacare is going to require them to buy policies expected to cost $5,800.
Why would they sign up for Obamacare?
The penalties are going to be much cheaper.
So why would people you're going to people just say, no, I'm not going to do it.
And come catch me.
I'm not doing it.
You can't find me with the NSA.
Well, you can't find me here.
No, I just got a an email.
There may be some confusion on the two of my T sweepstakes.
No, no, all you have to do to enter is purchase.
All you have to do is shop at 2FYT.com.
You're entered.
And you do that anyway.
There's some of the best selling tea in the country.
You do that anyway.
I'm just thinking you you go to the two of by tea.com website, shop, buy some tea.
Best tea free shipping, blah, blah.
You're automatically entered to win.
It's all splained there at uh 2FbyT.com.
Here's Mark passing through the little bighorn.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hi.
Great to be here, Rush.
I cannot believe I'm actually getting to speak to the man himself.
I am a gratified student of the Limbaugh Institute.
And I uh wonder thank you for buying me.
Thank you.
Making me think more critically.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate that.
I uh I will I've always believed that the simplest answers in life are probably the best.
And I've never heard anyone on either side of the aisle propose something that is similar to what we had at Ellis Island in the last turn of the last century.
I mean, if it worked then, and if we do look back on history and say that it did work, and it did, well, it was more or less efficient, did what it was supposed to do.
Why are we not doing something similar in a possibly in a joint venture with the Mexican government or government where they have screening facilities, free screening facilities on the south of the border?
And then we as you come across, we screen them again and find out what their what their goals are.
You want to be a full-fledged American citizen?
That's great.
We we'd love to have you.
You're going to learn to speak English.
And uh you're gonna take the test.
If you want to be a migrant worker and you want to come back every six months, we'll give you the workers' visa.
No, you're you're you're asking questions that make too much sense.
And they don't they don't have any relationship to the legislation pending.
No, and you know, when I it's not being proposed because they don't care as long as they vote for them and keep them in office, and condom in the believing they actually do care.
And now I wish there was if there ever were proposed, I'll I I believe I could hear the words coming out of the politicians.
No, no, no, we can't do that.
And what I want to tell you something.
I have you know me.
I have said countless times that the Democrats want these people, they're voters, that that's a permanent underclass.
And I, you know, I've been struggling to try.
Is there any other reason I'm missing?
Is there is there some other inexplicable or unknown, unforeseen reason why the Democrats don't want any real change to this system other than legalization?
They don't want any changes on the border, they don't want any added uh uh measures on on legalization.
Uh they just what you propose is is is actually quite sensible.
Okay, we acknowledge that people are gonna come here from Mexico.
So we set up places where people in Mexico go if they want to come to the United States.
And we interview them like we did at Ellis Island.
Hey, why are you here?
What do you want to do?
What are your objectives?
Blah, blah, blah, blah.
We we check their health.
We find out if if any of them are are sick and might be transporting a disease or whatever.
Uh, and then and then we make a a judgment based on policy guidelines at the moment.
Uh instead we're talking about fences and border control keep them out, uh deal with the eleven million are here every 20 or 30 years we grant amnesty, then wait for the next big batch to accumulate and grant some more amnesty.
I I I have I I realize how sadly, how partisan it sounds to say the Democrats simply look at these people as a bunch of future voters, but they do.
Of course they do.
They do.
There's no question that they do, and and it can be explained as logically as anything else can.
The Democrats need a lot of poor people dependent on government.
That's just undeniable.
That's the Democrat constituency.
And as pre-Obama, as people improved themselves financially and climbed ladders of success, they became less and less dependent on government, which made them less and less dependent on Democrats.
And so those people might have stopped voting Democrats, stopped being Democrat, they need to be replaced if the Democrats are to win elections.
So that's what this is.
It's patently obvious.
Now, to some people that sounds so cynical and so partisan, and that Democrats couldn't possibly do but but they do.
So then when you ask a sensible question like this and balance it against what's actually happening, I don't have an answer for you.
If we're serious about immigration, it makes perfect sense.
Because we don't want to shut it down.
We don't want to make the country impenetrable in this way.
We we have we we want to welcome people who are going to enhance this nation.
Uh uh it's I can't I don't have I uh don't have the answer for you, other than to say that both political parties do have political objectives here that really don't have anything to do with immigration.
Well I uh am I still on?
Well can you say what?
I'm sorry, am I still on?
You're still on, but I'm sure after I've you don't have any else to say, do you?
You couldn't possibly after I've no, well I had to say was uh when I hear talk about securing the border, I don't know what that means.
I have no idea what they're talking about when they talk we need a more secure border.
I I don't have any input from them other than they we need a secure border, we need a secure border.
Tell me what that means, because if you're building a fence, well, you know what that means.
You know what when people talk about securing the border, don't play you know what that means.
It means making sure that people aren't able to illegally cross it.
You're going to, though.
You had a wall in Berlin with armed guards, people trying to uh they risk their lives for that was to keep people in.
They still try to get to freedom.
If you've got a fence with no armed security, they're gonna cross the fence.
It's just a fence.
They're doing it every day with the fence that already exist.
How big of a fence do you want to build?
It's never gonna work.
Since you bring up the fence, the fence has already been authorized.
Money has been allocated for the fence.
It just hasn't been built.
And I think it was either Senator Sessions or Senator Cruz, might have been Senator Paul, one of them submitted an amendment to do what was already authorized.
And the amendment was voted down.
But the money for the fence has already been authored.
Some I forget how many miles of fence have been authorized, but very small percentage of the fence authorized has been built.
So somebody submitted an amendment to finish what's already been signed into law.
And then amendment failed.
And so the conclusion was they're not serious about this fence business.
just did that for political reasons.
It's well, Look, one thing I wanted to ask Senator Cruz, and I didn't have time, uh, and I should have written it down.
We are in this position because we never say no to a Democrat initiative.
The Democrats want national health care.
We don't say no.
And oppose it.
We have to have an alternative.
So they're always setting the agenda.
And by virtue of that, it's always us who seem to be contrarian.
We never, well, not never, but seldom do you hear of Republican initiatives.
And when they do exist, they're always characterized as reactionary things.
But I don't understand just because the Democrats want this, why do we have to have a version of it?
Democrats want amnesty.
Why can't we just say no and fight them on that?
Why do we have to, oh, you want amnesty?
Okay, well, we don't really like the way you're gonna do it.
Here, let's try it our way.
Now, in this case, so well, we need outreach to the Hispanics because they don't like us.
Okay, fine.
But and Rush we kiss can't say no because the Hispanics will never like us.
I mean, they already dislike us, didn't they?
Hate us.
So the Democrats want national health care.
Why don't we just say no?
That's the wrong thing to do.
What what?
But we don't say no.
Well, I take that back.
With Hillary Care, we did say no.
And look at, we won.
We did say no.
So we can do it and succeed.
But in way too many instances, I don't care what it is.
The Democrats decide they want something.
And I guarantee you, what has got the Republicans caught in the trap is this whole notion of what people are going to think of them.
They are so browbeaten by that, and they so believe it Democrats are so loved and Democrat policies are so loved that when the Democrats support something, the Republicans better appear to be that's what all this talk of bipartisanship is Republicans agreeing with Democrats.
It just ticks me off.
The whole thing just ticks me off.
When I stop and think about it.
I gotta take a breaker, I'm gonna get really, really obscenely ticked off, and that wouldn't be good.
That's it.
That's right.
You are automatically entered.
You go to 2FYT.com.
You're automatically entered to win the Great Sweepstakes Prize.
Okay, now, folks, um Obama.
Oh, first I want to answer the question about we.
Why don't we say no?
Because you know what I really got to do?
We have to define who the we is.
So what when I say the Democrats propose something, why don't we say no?
Well, what I'm talking about is the Republicans, but the problem with that is that there is a ruling class in Washington that is made up of people of both parties, and they don't really think of themselves as Republicans or Democrats.
They're identified that way for political purposes.
But Washington is its own universe.
So it's true that the Democrats want 46 million undocumented Democrats to come into the country.
Forty-six million foreigners, uh illegal immigrants, whatever.
Washington wants that.
The Democrats want that.
So when the Democrats want it, Washington wants it.
And some Republicans, this is where we get hung up on the why don't we say no?
Because there are people among the we, Republicans who support big government.
Oh, yeah, why do you think Tea Party candidates are opposed by the Republicans?
The Republic, you go back to the Christine O'Donnell, Sharon Angle, you know, those races, uh 20, whatever they were, 2010 midterms of 21, whatever.
Forget the years.
Doesn't matter.
The reason the Republicans really were worried about Christine O'Donnell and Sharon Engel is they really thought they wouldn't have a chance to win.
The Republicans wanted, you could hear them say they wanted to control the chairmanships in the Senate.
They wanted to get the chairmanships back.
They wanted.
There are Republicans that want to be in charge of the money too.
There are Republicans who want the power of controlling the money.
And that's what winning elections in Washington means.
It's not about to a lot of Republicans, it isn't about conservatism or liberalism or Democrats or Republicans.
It's about having the money or not having the money.
Having the power over the money, having the power to spend it for whatever things that they're trying to buy.
So there are a lot of Republicans who are also part of the we.
Democrats propose something.
There are some of the we who agree with it.
So Washington wants illegal immigration.
That means the Democrats want it.
And some Republicans too.
Washington wants a powerful IRS.
Washington wants Obamacare.
Washington wants 46 million foreigners.
And there are a number of Republicans, you now and I know that get saddled into the have-to-be categorized as in the we.
And that's the problem.
When I say, why don't we say no, I'm making a felonious uh not felonious, fallacious assumption that all Republicans oppose this, and they don't.
And that ticks me off even more.
But I got to hear a little bit of Obama.
In Berlin today, at the Brandenburg Gate, audio soundbite number six.
This he said the most important issue facing the people of the planet.
With a global middle class consuming more energy every day, this must now be an effort of all nations, not just some.
For the grim alternative affects all nations.
More severe storms, more famine and floods, new waves of refugees, coastlines that vanish, oceans that rise.
This is the future we must avert.
This is the global threat of our time.
And for the sake of future generations.
Our generation must move toward a global compact to confront a changing climate before it is too late.
That is our job.
That is our task.
And we cannot do it.
We cannot control the climate.
We cannot affect it.
We can't fix it.
We can't stop it.
We can't make it happen.
We can't do anything.
The way to translate this is you need to stand aside and let governments grow and grow and grow.
That's what that means.
We all must come together and then stand aside and let us who run governments grow them even bigger.
That's all this global warming climate change crap is about.
You can't stop a hurricane.
You can't stop a coastline or whether it's sinking or rising sea levels.
You can't stop any of it.
You can't cause it.
You can't limit it in any way.
Absolute croc.
That's it, folks.
We are a wrap for today.
Hope you have a uh a wonderful rest of the day.
We'll be back in 21 hours, revved up and ready to go, do it all over again here at the EIB Network.
▲
Export Selection