All Episodes
Previous Next
May 24, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:18
May 24, 2013, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
News flash, ladies and gentlemen, President Obama has just appointed Colonel Sanders to oversee and investigate the slaughter of chickens.
It's Friday.
Let's hit it.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
That's right, folks.
Eric Holder will examine himself.
Eric Holder will investigate himself and his department over the bugging of journalists, telephones, phone records, and emails.
Specifically James Rosen of Fox and a couple others, AP.
And Barack Obama, President Obama, has said he really doesn't like this.
He doesn't think that journalists doing their jobs should be criminalized.
While his administration is criminalizing it.
It's the limbaugh theorem.
It is what it is.
Obama coming out in publicly opposing everything he's doing.
Same thing at the uh at the Code Pink speech yesterday.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back.
It's open line Friday.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network and the Limbaugh Institute.
By the way, if you um if you're just really hankering to write some emails to people about your true thoughts of the IRS, this is the day to do it.
They're furloughed.
This is May 24th.
The IRS is furloughed today because of the sequester.
And then, of course, Monday is Memorial Day.
They're not working.
You might have an entire weekend where you can unload.
Plus Lois Learner.
Do you know Lois Learner in the whatever it was, three or four years, it's now scrolled out of my vision.
Lois learner was paid something like $780,000 over four years or three years, where she was engaged in all of this activity that was aimed at denying tax exempt status to Tea Party groups.
Salary and bonus.
She was earning more than members of Congress.
She was earning more than some senators, some committee chairmen.
And now she's been placed on administrative leave.
Do you know what that means?
Paid vacation.
Not paid leave, paid vacation.
Lois learner.
So the IRS uh the this is it's the first weekend of the of the Memorial Day weekend, first day of the of the weekend, and everything's pretty much changed its vibe.
Uh there isn't a whole lot going on.
Everybody psychologically, mentally already is uh is engaged in the long weekend.
Lois learner from 2009 to 2012 earned about 780,000.
That was for a job well done.
Uh paid more than 740,000 between 2009 and 2012, which is the period that the IRS was targeting the Tea Party.
Her salary therefore averaged more than 185,000 a year, which is higher than Congressmen and Senators.
And on top of that, she received more than 42,000 in bonuses.
But if she helped Obama get re-elected and she earned two days ago, three days ago, folks, spent a lot of time, and by the way, I've now seen this reported in a number of places, and again, it's cutting edge stuff.
Three days three days ago, you know, we've been talking for the longest time actually about the phenomenon of the 2012 election.
Obama got millions fewer votes in 2012 when he didn't know eight.
But so did Romney get many million fewer votes than did McCain.
And up until this IRS scandal hit, the analysis of Romney's low vote turnout centered on white voters.
There were Supposedly, four million white voters who just didn't show up.
And then people began to offer their theories, me included, as to why, based on that statistic.
And you remember the theories they ran the gamut.
Well, a lot of these people were conservative and didn't like Romney, wasn't a conservative enough, and so they sat it out.
The other explanation was that these people were just, they're the ones, they're the backbones of the country.
They're the ones getting up and going to work every day.
They're the ones losing their jobs.
They're the ones that are trying hard to improve, play by the rules, and nobody's paying attention to them.
Everybody's focused on the illegals, everybody's focused on gay marriage, everybody's focused on all these other things.
The hell with it.
And they just stayed home.
Now we know.
Now we know it may have been all that, but there was also vote suppression.
Major, that's what this IRS scandal is, folks.
Voter suppression.
This election, the 2012 election, honestly deserves an asterisk next to it.
Lois Lerner and the IRS made sure.
Oh, and here's another thing.
It is still going on.
Don't think that it's ended.
You do not, let's say you're a Tea Party group and you're applying for tax exempt status.
You don't have to be denied in order to be discriminated against.
What if your application has been in for years and it's still open and you just haven't heard?
It's the equivalent of being denied.
You still can't get into action.
You can't get into gear.
So this partisan attack on Tea Party and other conservative groups concerning tax exempt status is still going on.
There are groups who have applications in they're just languishing.
No action has been taken.
So the IRS doesn't have to flat out deny you your status.
They can just delay the approval.
So you're sitting out there in limbo.
And that is continuing to happen.
And the upshot of it is that a lot of Tea Party money was never raised and therefore was never spent on this campaign.
A lot of Tea Party enthusiasm was tamped down.
A lot of religious Tea Party groups never got into gear.
They were never authorized to.
They were never authorized to start.
They needed to be able to fundraise on a tax-exempt way in order to get started, and they weren't.
There was a flat out, there's no doubt about it now.
That's what this is all about.
There was a flat out effort to suppress the conservative vote in this election while everybody was listening to the allegation that conservatives wanted to suppress the black vote or the gay vote.
All the attention focused on photo ID to be able to vote.
That's just racism.
That's an effort to suppress the black vote.
You remember all during that campaign, the Democrats worried about Republican vote fraud and suppressing the vote.
Well, where it really happened was the government, the IRS.
Another political arm of the Obama regime, literally suppressing conservative voting, fundraising, and turnout.
Right?
I'll tell you something.
You know, I I if I would have been thinking, you know, even I end up taking too much at face value.
The reason that I thought all of the pre-election polling in 2012 was wrong was because they were using 08 turnout for their models.
And I was sitting here telling you, I'm all frustrated.
What about 2010?
Is nobody remembered the 2010 midterms?
The 2010 midterms, the Democrat Party got smoked.
And it was the Tea Party that did it.
The Democrat Party got smoked all the way down to local elections, where they got beat.
I think the Democrats lost close to 700 seats nationwide, including the Republicans taking back the House.
It was a huge turnaround in 2010.
It was massive.
And I just naturally concluded that that turnout would show up again in 2012 because what was it that inspired that turnout?
Obamacare.
and the stimulus and every other assault that Obama had made on this economy in this country.
Nothing had changed.
It had only gotten worse.
And I kept looking at these pre-election polls which show Obama winning by five or sixes.
This doesn't make sense to me.
The election happens.
I look at the exit polling data.
55% still blame Bush for the economy.
I saw that, I knew it was over.
Five o'clock exit poll.
I knew it.
And then the other question that sealed it for me was that question cares about people like me.
That one broke out 81 to 19 for Obama.
And that was the 5 o'clock exit poll.
I said, it's over.
This is and the whole night then everybody kept waiting for Ohio as the last chance.
So the election's over, and we're analyzing it, and we talk about all this.
And I think what happened at 2010 turnout?
Well, now we know, folks.
Now we know.
The Democrats did take note of what happened to them in 2010.
They did take note of what the Tea Party did, and by God, they make sure they weren't going to be able to do it in 2012, and they did.
And those pre-election polls that were using a 28, 2008 turnout for their modeling.
And you remember, we would marvel here at the samples that would have Democrats plus 11 and plus eight.
And they were basing that on what happened in 2008 and nothing changing in 2012.
So what about 2010?
I said, now, 2010 especially, there wasn't even a Republican on the ballot.
There wasn't a Republican issue on the ballot.
There wasn't a single thing on the ballot that would unite and inspire Republicans what that 2010 turnout was about was stopping Obama.
Now that, well, those people are going to show up again.
And then we were told, nope, Romney made them stay home.
And that never made sense to me.
I'm sorry, it just never made sense to me.
I never understood intellectually how people who were so opposed to Obama in 2010 because of what was happening to the country could in two years end up having more dislike for Romney.
That just didn't fit.
But we didn't know then what we know now.
We had to accept that explanation.
And I'm feeling like an idiot here for doing so.
Because now we know there was utter, there's no other way to describe this.
It was pure, utter voter suppression.
That's what the IRS was doing.
It was no different than what the Black Panthers, the new Black Panther Party did at places in Philadelphia.
There was voter intimidation there at those polling places.
So this is, you know, this is this is uh really serious stuff, and it's not getting traction really beyond the political class.
Not yet, be honest about it.
Low information voters, the polling date anyway, says they don't care, who knows.
But I'll tell you, I'm I never forget that Thomas Edsall piece.
I quoted this over and over.
New York Times column.
It was in November of 2011, which they admitted that Obama was was uh going to abandon the white working class vote and try to suppress it.
That's what the purpose of that column was.
They came out and said what they were going to do.
They were going to try to depress and dispirit the conservative vote while giving up on the white middle class vote.
They were going to give up on getting the vote, but they were going to do what they could to make sure they didn't show up, and they did.
Just another form of uh election fraud.
Now, in hindsight.
Nothing you can do about it other than learn from it for future, but I mean it's it really is maddening.
Did you did you have you seen uh, ladies and gentlemen, the story about the boyfriend and girlfriend who stabbed each other over what happened on American Idol.
I am holding here in my formerly nicotine stained fingers.
Story from Gauker.
An argument between a Pennsylvania couple over which American Idol finalists deserve to win the contest escalated quickly, resulting in a knife fight that left the pair bloodied and behind bars.
Forty-eight-year-old Karen Elaine Harrelson, 57-year-old Gregory Stambaugh, were hanging out in the basement of Stambaugh's West Manchester Township home last week, watching the American Idol season finale and drinking beer.
According to Stambaugh, it was Harrelson who produced the knife, stabbing him in the left forearm.
He claims that she was accidentally wounded during a subsequent struggle for the weapon.
Though they were found by the police on the porch with their clothes covered in blood, neither has sustained a serious injury.
Their pictures, their mug shots are posted here.
Boyfriend and girlfriend in a knife fight over the...
I mean, what we have here.
What we have here, folks, is the epitome of low information voters.
You should see these mugshots.
In fact, you know what I'm going to do?
I'm going to show them to you in the ditto cam.
I take a break here and I'll set it up.
And if you it's always it's always good.
Talk about low information voters.
It's good to be able to put a face or faces to such human categories.
We'll do it when we come back.
Okay, here we go.
I'm going to turn on the ditto cam now, and I'm going to hold his picture up.
These are the two people in Pennsylvania got into a knife fight during the finale of American Idol ended up.
These are their mugshots, and this is it, folks.
These are I mean it if you've ever wondered what low information voters look like that's it.
There's your uh debt.
Speaks for it.
I'm sorry, those of you listening and don't have access to the ditto cam can't see it.
We'll post it at uh Rushlinbaugh.com.
There you go.
I've got to refocus the diddle cam I'll get it back on here in just a second.
In the meantime, we start on the phones in Homer, Alaska.
This is Fred, and it's great to have you here, Fred.
Hello and welcome.
Mr. Limbaugh, it's an honor and a pleasure to be on your show again.
Uh just a brief reminder, we talked about Dan's bake sale back in 1992.
Way to be a good idea.
But anyway, my question is this.
If we take Barack Obama at his word and all the people that are underneath him at their word, my question is who's running this country?
We have many scandals uh going on here.
We have the Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, and uh the list goes on and on, the AP and so on and so forth, and then you have Barack Obama, the number one most powerful man in the world, and he has all these people underneath him from Eric Holder to Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Jay Carney, Joe Biden, Leon Panetta, Lois Lerner, and on and on and on.
And yet when they're asked questions, they're like, I don't know.
I haven't heard anything, and then our president gets on national TV and broadcasts to the people.
Well, I get my news from the same place you do.
I just heard about this last week over uh on the mainstream uh media.
So if if our president is as uninformed as he claims to be, who's running this country?
Well, now you and I know that Obama is running the country, and that all of these people are doing exactly what they know Obama wants done.
But that's you and me.
Let me give you a different picture, a different scenario.
So all of this stuff is going on, all of it, except George Bush is president.
Uh and George Bush is saying, I don't know anything about this, and Alberto Gonzalez didn't know about it, and Cheney didn't know anything about it.
Do you think that the media would be, oh, okay, uh, you guys don't know about it.
Government's too big.
It's really impossible for any one person to know what's going on.
For a nanosecond.
So it we it unfortunately, you know, be it becomes a cliche.
And it it oftentimes it it sounds like it becomes too simplistic, but it always comes back to the media.
It always comes back.
And the reason it does is because low information voters still patronize the media.
That's their audience.
Plus they're Obama voters, and they believe him.
They believe him because for five years Obama hasn't been in charge of anything.
For five years, Obama's been opposing everything.
This is just standard operating procedure par for the course.
Nothing new here.
Plus the government's so big it's it's hard for a guy like that.
Okay, so we had the two low information voters engaged in a knife fight in Pennsylvania during the finale of American Idol, and we showed you their mugshots.
A North Carolina mother had her son arrested this week for taking her pop tarts without permission.
A child was busted on a larceny charge, according to the Charlotte Mecklenburg police department, whose officers were summoned Monday night to a Charlotte home by Latasha Renee Love, the accused juveniles, 37-year-old mother.
Police report notes that the known suspect stole Pop Tarts belonging to his mother at their home.
Suspect was uh juvenile, arrested at the home at the time of the offense.
Cops described the stolen goods as valued at five dollars.
The cops were called in Charlotte, North Carolina for a five dollar theft of Pop Tarts by a mother on her son.
Low information voters, no doubt.
Can't spank them, but you can call a cop, a 37-year-old mother, again, the name here is uh Latasha Renee Love, reportedly has had discipline issues with the child, apparently received or said decided to have him arrested as some kind of a lesson.
By the way, there's a mugshot picture of her here after a September 2009 drunk driving arrest.
The misdemeanor case against the kid will be handled in juvenile court.
There's...
Okay.
Well, I I the the file didn't print.
The mugshot file didn't print of Latasha Renee Love.
I don't have that.
Um the people of Venezuela are grappling with a nationwide shortage of toilet paper.
We mentioned this a couple of weeks ago.
An all-too common occurrence in socialist states.
But rather than question maybe their economy as the problem, the president, the new president of uh of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, said this week that shortages in luxury items.
Did you know that toilet paper is a luxury item in Venezuela, apparently it is.
And the shortages in luxury items are the result of a shadowy conspiracy concocted by the rich.
Conservatives and the rich in Venezuela have concocted a conspiracy to commandeer all the toilet paper in Venezuela.
Now I don't know this for sure, but if I had to guess, I would say that the middle class voters in Venezuela believe it.
Be my guests.
Here's Robert in Norfolk, Virginia on Open Line Friday.
Welcome, sir.
Great to have you.
Hey, old friend.
I was calling a brag on one of your uh advertisers.
I my mother's 85, she lives in Winchetau Falls, Texas, and I uh order those flowers on your flower program for Mother's Day.
And uh, I gotta tell you the truth.
I order them so they get there early, because she's old, and uh I had emailed her to see if she received a package from me.
She said no.
So I said I said, Mom and calling back in two minutes.
So I called that Flowers 800 Flowers program and I said, My mom's expecting something.
She doesn't receive them, and they said they're on the front door, so I call mom back.
She's eighty-five.
I said, Mom, when's the last time of your front door?
And she says, I never go to my front door, she's a big old house widow.
So she goes front door, she says, There's two big boxes here, Bobby.
I said, Mom, don't bend down and pick 'em up.
You're gonna fall down.
So she uh she kicks them in.
I thought to mom yesterday, those flowers are still going.
I doubled the order, mentioned your name.
It's not a setup call, America.
I mean, that was it was a good day.
It was a good day.
That's absolutely fine.
It was a good day.
And and I when I had emailed my computer blew out that day, so and um thing is totally shot.
But I mean they followed up and then about four hours later they called to see did she not get him at the front door.
I told them the story anyway.
Uh and I talked to mom today and I talked to her almost every day, and uh she says those flowers are still gone.
She stinned them down to about eighteen out of the two dozen.
I double it like I said, and she says they're gorgeous, all her friends are jealous of them.
Where is where does your mother live?
Wichita Falls, Texas.
My dad's an old Shepherd Air Force Bay.
My old man is uh uh well he passed, he was an old phantom pilot.
And uh but uh she lives out there in Wichita Falls, Texas.
That's north that's up north by the Oklahoma border.
She's got uh she's got a tornado shelter.
But uh how old is your mom?
Eighty-five.
Eighty five.
And uh, like I said, I I I she didn't get the email.
I didn't know my computer blown out, but the uh but uh God bless her, you know.
I mean, she loved it.
I said, Mom, I I got him off the Rush Limbaugh show.
She's I listen to him all the time.
All my girlfriends like him.
So you know blue-haired bloody marriages, like my mom's she's our threat, blue haired bloody marriage, she's still driving her own car, she's talking about uh going into an another home, and uh but you know what that made that that was that was a good thing.
Uh yeah, you're you are your product your that corporation is exactly what it says.
Well, you know, they're the first.
1-800 flowers is the first.
They started uh just it as just uh the owner owned a couple flower shops and they pioneered the entire overnight delivery uh with flowers concept and in conjunction with their flower shops, they uh uh in many cases grow their own and they come up with their own unique bouquets, and they really are great people.
And they've also got a uh uh a company called the Popcorn Factory.
I've I've I have And they make more flavors of and and concoctions of popcorn than you can possibly imagine.
I'll be done.
And that's delighted.
I think that's out of Chicago.
I'll be darn.
Well, you know, the the thing is they did exactly what they said, and when they called me back, they said they're didn't she know, and I said, No, I couldn't get through to her with the email, and she loves her email, and they and I but uh I said, Mom, do not bend down and pick she said, There are two boxes out here, Bobby, and I said, Mom, push him in somehow or get my brother over.
And I said, you know, I've got eight brothers and f uh sisters.
I said, the last thing you need to do is find you out there on the sidewalk and blame me for sending your flowers.
Well, that's great.
I can't thank you enough for that.
Did you say your dad flew phantoms?
Do you mean the McDonnell Douglas F four for them?
My dad flew 86's P 51s.
Uh my dad flew P fifty ones.
My dad flew, my dad was uh flew with uh Joe Foss in the South Dakota Air National Guard.
He was his uh left wing man.
No kidding.
And uh my family's from South Dakota.
I was born there.
I never really lived there, but uh uh he was uh P 51 pilot in the South Dakota Air National Guard, P51s.
I didn't know your old man flew.
So China Burma.
I'll be darned.
We uh when I was young man, I I met General Claire Chenault.
So his uh that was back in a long time ago.
Well, I can't thank you enough.
I I appreciate that.
And the people at 1800 Flowers are going to a door hearing the story.
They um we we we go to great lengths to make sure that that the uh sponsors here who who claim certain levels of customer service actually can pull it off.
I don't want to give away our techniques in determining this stuff, but we do it.
We create scenarios like yours and we try it, and uh if they're gonna claim it, we want to know that it happens.
And that's just it's it's fabulous news.
Now, folks, for those of you uh you may not know what an F four phantom is.
If you happen to see the movie The Right Stuff, there's a scene near the end of the movie where the actor playing Chuck Yeager steals an F4.
Commandeers an F4.
And Yeager is just dying to go into space.
And he missed it by virtue of age.
So he gets in at F-4.
He now the incident didn't really happen in the way it's portrayed.
He didn't illegally commandeer an F-4 and take off in violation of control tower authority and so forth.
But the it's the plane in that scene, if you recall, that's what a uh Phantom F-4 is, F four phantom.
And Yeager took that thing in the movie as high as it goes.
He's flying that thing straight up.
He wants it to get high.
He wants to go into space.
And ends up having to eject.
And the right stuff is about all the people in the space program who have the right stuff.
But not that the incident is verbatim true to form, but if you remember the movie, that's the aircraft.
That's what the guy's talking about.
I just want you to be able to visualize.
If you don't know what an F4 phantom is, that was it.
Anyway, Robert, thanks.
I really appreciate it.
Speaking of all this, Catherine and I called a sweepstakes winners last night uh for the five-day, four-night first class all the way trip to Hawaii.
There's two of my T sweepstakes.
And the uh the winners are Stephen and Linda from Texas.
And we called them.
And we knew it was going to go to voicemail because they got the two rings real close together, and then the standard steady rings.
And I said, that's just going to voicemail.
So we decided, normally when we get voicemail, we just give them all the data, hang up and you know, tease them for missing us.
We said, you know, we're gonna call you back.
We'll call you back within a couple of hours.
If your phone rings the next couple hours and you don't recognize it, it's us.
So we called back and they picked up and we talked to them, and it was just it's it's it's so much fun to do that to actually talk to these people who are entering the contest and winning it.
Uh to hear how excited they are.
It was it turns out they are celebrating their 30th wedding anniversary this year.
Uh they're from Texas, and they haven't been to Hawaii in many, many moons, 25 or 30 years.
So they're gonna they're looking forward to it.
So that was an upper.
Uh that was oh, and folks, we are sold out of Tumblr.
I knew this is gonna happen.
Those things went like I mean, you the the the these are the 1299 turvis tumblers, this thing right here.
Sold out of them.
They're literally sold out.
Well, the the the next pressure point is Father's Day.
We don't know if we can restock in time.
And and we're trying, and I can't possibly commit to this.
Uh Foxcon does not these are American-made.
Foxconn does not make turf tumblers, Turvis makes the tumblers.
But I knew this is gonna happen.
Once they're out there, and believe me, tens of thousands of them are out there, sold out, and once people see them at 1299 are gonna won.
That's what's happening.
And we just we blew through the original supply.
So uh we're trying to find a way to get restocked by Father's Day, and I don't know if we're gonna be able to do it.
I'll keep you posted on it.
But it's um it was uh it was just a great time.
So I wanted to congratulate Lyndon Steve again from Texas of Sweepstakes winners and then that other ten other grand prize winners that would be calling during the day to day today to um let them know as well what it is that they have won.
Okay, that's it.
Timeout back after this, no course.
All right, now I'm being told that I got it wrong.
It was not an F4 Phantom in the in the movie The Right Stuff, it was an F-104.
Starfighter.
And I could have sworn I could have sworn it was an F4.
I could have sworn I heard Yeager talking about that scene in the movie, claiming, nah, I didn't steal F4, nobody steal an F4.
I could have sworn he said F4.
But now I'm being told here it was an F-104, a Lockheed, as opposed to McDonnell Douglas.
Sorry for the confusion.
Here's Mike in Greenville, North Carolina.
Great to have you, sir, on open line Friday.
Hi.
Thank you, sir.
I really appreciate it, Mr. Limbaugh.
It's a pleasure to see you be on your show.
And let me do two things.
First of all, I'm reading from the good people of North Carolina to you yourself.
And you can be forgiven for confusing an with a F 104, as far as I'm concerned.
Well.
I appreciate that, sir.
Thank thank you for your for your understanding and your tolerance.
Yes, of course.
I'm going to try to make some sense here for a moment.
What I would like to do is make a connection to something that you said yesterday that was interesting and powerful.
And then I would like to try to make a point, which is going to be, I hope, a polite disagreement with you.
So the connection is yesterday, um, you know, it was interesting that here Obama is in this almost perfect storm, right?
Three major scandals all at the same time is Benghazi, the IRS scandal, um scandal concerning procurement of AP emails.
And what hasn't happened as a result of that, as you were saying, is that apparently, you know, the polls aren't moving in response to these scandals, and I scratched my head, and you know, you you said something I thought compelling, which is what well this is the problem of the low information public.
That people aren't.
Yeah, that's the the the latest polling data is that only 25-26% of the people are paying close attention or even care about any of these scandals.
Yeah.
That just makes the point.
My point, which is that it's important that people be informed, that they need to know what's happening, and you and I can certainly agree with that.
So, but here's the point.
Um, and I'm gonna ask you, please, sir, to not cut me off.
I just want to make the point.
Um, I wondered very much about what you were saying about the low information voter, and that got me to go to a study that has recently been um public.
What is let's we're we're running out of time here.
No, sir.
Yeah, the clock is gonna cut you off if we don't get to the polite disagreement.
I thought you might do.
I I hope you won't, sir.
I hope you won't.
I hope you won't say that you're running out of time.
I think you can do better than that.
Farley Dickinson University, according to their study, Fox viewers are the least knowledgeable audience of any outlet, and they know even less about politics and events than people who watch no news at all.
What's really interesting about that, if you're still there and you're not going to cut me off.
Well, you know what, if that's the case, if the if the uh if Fairley Dickinson University says that the Fox News audience is the least informed, then I think it's perfectly okay to bug their reporters.
I'll rethink this.
If the if Fairley Dickinson University says that it's that the Fox News audience is the stupidest and the least informed, then that's cool.
Then it's okay to bug their reporters.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, this man speaking from the bottom of the barrel in which he lives.
Uh, lied intently to Mr. Snerdley about what he wanted to talk about.
Um it took him much longer to get to his point with these endless implications that I was going to cut him off.
And he deserves to be cut off because a liar.
Uh what he said he wanted to ask me was how can I claim that Obama declared the war on terror is over.
He doesn't think Obama said that.
That's what he claimed he wanted to talk about.
And it said he wants to insult the Fox audience.
Now, if he would have said he wants to talk about the Fox audience being the least informed, we'd have talked about it with him.
But he thought he had to sneak in here and then imply that I am unfair to callers when I am the most polite and the most tolerant, as I've just demonstrated, with this guy.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, a brief timeout, another obscene profit timeout here on the EIB network.
Don't go away.
That's it.
Open line Friday rolls on.
We've got another big exciting hour, just awaiting its commencement, which will happen immediately after this.
▲
Export Selection