All Episodes
Previous Next
May 21, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:42
May 21, 2013, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Lots of stuff happening out there, ladies and gentlemen, and we are on top of all of it.
That's what we do.
I am Rush Limbaugh, and I am America's real anchor man.
I am America's truth detector, and I am America's doctor of democracy on this, the most listened to radio talk show in the country, the Excellence and Broadcasting Network of the Rush Limbaugh program.
Great to have you here.
We are going to get to your telephone calls, El Quico, the telephone number 800 282-2882, the email address.com, Max Bauch.
Max Bauchus, now investigating the IRS.
The same guy who urged the IRS to target conservative groups in 2010.
Senator Max Bauchus, who happened, he's retiring, isn't he?
Yeah.
And none too soon.
Max Bauchus today.
To what extent did the IRS say we got to look at some of these organizations in the context of Citizens United?
Well, he's the one who asked them to.
Max Baukas, who's now investigating the IRS, is the guy, one of many, by the way, who urged the IRS to target conservative groups way back in 2010.
Max Bauchus leading an investigation into why the IRS targeted conservative nonprofit groups.
Remember now the acting commissioner Stephen Miller said today that it was partisan.
The only thing noteworthy about that was that he said it wasn't partisan last week.
I guess a threat of perjury has this tendency to squeeze the truth out of things.
So he's admitting that it was partisan.
Max Bauchus, leading an investigation into why the IRS targeted conservative nonprofit groups for extra security.
Despite the fact that Bauchus once wrote a letter urging the IRS to do exactly that.
Balk is the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and he will head that committee's investigation into the IRS.
But Bauchus wrote a letter to then IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman.
It was dated September 28th of 2010.
He urged the IRS to investigate nonprofit conservative groups during the Tea Party dominated 2010 midterm election.
This um this scandal's gonna continue to dribble out.
This is it's it's uh what do you call this?
Just a drip drip drip.
You know, a little wet leak, wet leak here.
This is just it's just gonna keep dribbling out.
And I'm not gonna change what I said, yeah.
This is not gonna, it's not gonna get Obama, folks.
That isn't gonna happen.
This country is not gonna support removing the first African American president from office.
It isn't gonna happen.
Change your focus.
Uh the the the focus here, as I said yesterday, the day before and last week, the focus here needs to be this is what happens when liberals run things.
You really need to be pointing this out.
This is what happens when liberals have control of government.
It gets big out of control, and they use every aspect of government they can for political purposes.
The in fact, as far as liberals are concerned, the reason to acquire power is to use government to target your enemies.
That's exactly what's happening here, and it wouldn't matter if it was it was what was going on to a certain extent with Clinton.
It's certainly what happened with FDR.
They're liberals.
This is what they do.
We conservatives want to get government out of everybody's lives, including our own.
These people salivate over the possibility of having all this power, and believe me, their purpose, not to defend and protect the Constitution.
Their purpose not to build a greater country.
Their purpose is to get rid of their enemies.
Their opponents.
I'll tell you there's something else happening in health care.
Labor unions are breaking with uh President Obama on Obamacare, and I tell you, you know, one of the one of these little pleasures in life, folks, Is when liberals realize that their fellow liberals are screwing them too, in addition to us.
It's just one of those little pleasures when these little libs, the pajama clad little kook extremists doing nothing all day but cashing welfare checks and typing comments on all their favorite blogs.
When they realize that their fellow libs are targeting them too.
That's fun to watch.
And from the Hill.com, labor unions are breaking with Obama on Obamacare months after the president's re-election, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the regime plans to implement Obamacare.
And they warned that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic.
These are unions that supported Obama, gave money to Obama, campaigned for Obama, beat up Tea Party people at town hall meetings for Obama.
These are people that run out and try to intimidate people at town hall meetings or any at voting places.
The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, the UFCW, 1.3 million member labor group that endorsed Obama twice for president now very worried about how the Obamacare law will affect its members' health care plans.
I, in a related story, I've got it somewhere here in the stack, and I'll paraphrase it pending having it right in front of me.
There are actually people, I have stories on this.
There are actually bureaucrats, liberal bureaucrats in government in positions of administering the health care law, who the reports I have say are literally shocked that premiums are not going down.
They really believe, so the story says, they really believed that Obamacare was going to expand coverage and make it cheaper and expand treatment and make it better, and they are literally shocked.
They can't believe it.
So says the story.
I'm not making this up, and it's this is not from an isolated kookball website.
This is like it's either Time or USA Today or some Washington Post, New York Times.
It's something that everybody would consider a credible mainstream media to the extent they're credible, but my point is it's not some unheard-of website putting this out.
The people are, as they're watching it be implemented, they can't believe what they're seeing.
They can't believe, I know what it is.
They can't believe that companies are having to go part-time, part-time, reduce hours to stay in business.
That's what it is.
They are shocked to see that, and they believe it now.
They are shocked to see what companies are having to do to stay.
They thought, so says the story, these nameless bureaucrats, they thought that this was going to be a shot in the arm for small business.
Well, it's what I was talking about in the first hour.
Who are these people?
These are the groupies, these are the sycophants, these are the acolytes.
They listen to Obama make all these blind, nameless, mindless promises, and they believe it.
Your premium will come down 2500.
And if you like your doctor, you get to keep your doctor.
If you like your plan, you believe this stuff.
They believe Obama was going to make the sea levels go down.
They believed Obama's going to end global warming.
They believed all this stuff.
These are just full-fledged mindless twerp groupies.
And these are the people that Obama puts in office or puts in these positions to execute his agenda blindly following it no matter where it goes, and then when they see that what their dear leader told them isn't true, they're literally confounded.
That's why I've always said there's there's a bunch of different strata of uh of liberals.
It's like any other group.
You got the leaders, the strategists, the organizers, And then you've got the dupes and the true believers and the useful idiots ranking who believe all this crap.
And they're shocked.
That's why I say it's it's a fun thing to witness when liberals realize that they're getting screwed by their buddies.
The politicization of the tornado, to get back to this, Liz Winstead was a creator of the Daily Show.
Oh, by the way.
You know, I have never made a big deal about this because that's not who I am, as it is.
Popular culture, you know, some guy gets arrested for DUI.
That's not who I am.
The guy gets arrested for beating up a woman.
I don't know what happened.
That's not who I am.
Yes, it is who you are.
It's a common excuse now.
That's but the crisis PR people urged it.
It's not who I am.
That person wasn't me.
Anyway.
The Daily Show is said to be the newest show of young adults.
And they ran a graphic last night that we have had on our website since 2010, Barack Elips now.
They ran it in conjunction with all these scandals that are starting to chip away at Obama.
Barack Ellips now.
Coco sent it to me today.
Coco says he sent me a note.
I'm so ticked off at this.
You did the Daily Show before John Stewart ever thought about doing TV.
You did the that's what your TV show was.
And this guy gets all this credit and all this stuff.
And now they're lifting stuff from our website.
Conceptually.
I mean, the graphic is a little different, but the whole Barack ellipse now, that was us in uh in 2010.
And anyway, the the creator of the, and they've got 30 writers, and they've got, you know, when the writers go on strike, that show goes off the air.
Anyway, Liz Winstead, creator of the Daily Show, within minutes of the tornado hitting yesterday, tweeted, this tornado is in Oklahoma, so clearly it has been ordered to only target conservatives.
This is the same woman, Liz Winstead, who attacked Michelle Bachman on abortion.
She raises money for planned parenthood.
She tweeted an apology about 7 o'clock last night, made a political joke, twas before devastation revealed.
In hindsight, had I understood, I would have refrained beyond sorry.
Sheldon White House, Rhode Island Senator, got on an anti-Republican rant over global warming five minutes after the tornado hit.
Well, here you have Liz Winstead.
Tornadoes in Oklahoma.
Clearly it's been ordered to only target conservatives.
Oops, oops, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I didn't mean it.
If I didn't know the devastation was so bad, I wouldn't have done it.
Oh gosh, I'm so sadly.
See, the liberals can get away with all this mean-spirited extremism that they mean.
They intend it.
Cheryl Atkison.
Cheryl Atkison is suggests she was answering some questions what happened to James Rosen at Fox.
That's, and we talked about that in great detail yesterday, too.
In order to basically bug James James Rosen's emails, the regime had to call him a co-conspirator in a plan to undermine U.S. foreign policy.
I mean, it's it's just beyond the pale.
And of course, who did that?
Obama didn't know anything about it.
No, no, no.
Obama doesn't know anything about anything.
Obama didn't even know he's president.
That's how detached he is.
They have to tell him every day, you know, you are president.
Oh, yeah, okay, I'll see you on a basketball court, gonna go shoot hoops.
Anyway.
So whoever's doing what they're doing to James Rosen, they don't have to be told by Obama to do it.
That's that they know that's what's expected.
Cheryl Atkison, who she's answering a question about James Rosen, said that She's not ready to fully talk publicly about this, but there has been an issue with her house and with her computer that was first noticed on or possibly before February 2011 that is being investigated by an analyst.
See, she'd been covering Fast and Furious and the Green Energy Stories and uh the Benghazi, but that hadn't happened yet.
Uh she'd been covering these things.
Nobody else at CBS was.
The White House is very nervous about it.
And she said several times that uh she thinks her work and personal computers have been compromised.
She hasn't detailed it yet.
But she's convinced that somebody has wormed in to her personal and work computers.
Quote, there is definitely been an intrusion into my computer system.
I really can't say more than that right now.
Wonder if she'll talk to Bob Schiefer about it.
And Eugene Robinson, the columnist of the Washington Post.
Mr. Snerdley, I'll let your take on this.
Because Eugene Robinson, a prominent African American, a regular guest on MSNBC.
Obama administration mistakes for espionage.
The Obama administration has no business rummaging through journalist phone records, pursuing their emails, tracking their movements in an attempt to keep them from gathering news.
This heavy-handed business isn't chilling, it's just plain cold.
And Rosen's only apparent transgression was doing journalism.
This unwarranted snooping would be troubling enough if it were an isolated incident, but it's part of a pattern that threatens to redefine investigative reporting as criminal behavior.
Eugene Robinson dumping on Obama and the regime.
You know, I I I don't know about this.
Eugene, how could you do this?
Not you, Gene.
From me to you, but how could you do this?
What about the struggle?
I mean, Obama's trying his best.
He got all those racist hicks out there trying to stop everything he's doing.
It doesn't need you piling on.
Come on, man.
It's just a guy from Fox.
Who cares?
Okay, to the phones we go, and uh we're gonna go to Pittsburgh.
This is Kathy, and I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the program.
Mr. Limbaugh, it's an honor.
I was gonna say it's a pleasure to talk to you.
It's an honor to speak to you.
Thank you very much.
Um Thank you.
I'll get right to the point.
Um you spoke earlier about the Democrats and how they used every disaster and and everything to promote their agenda such as global warming.
Well, yesterday when um this all happened when when this was all unfolding, I got onto my Twitter feed.
I seemed to be able to get news quicker that way than from anywhere else.
And before I saw anything about the tornado, I saw um a few Democrats tweeting the names of Republican, I assume Republican lawmakers in Oklahoma that voted against the Hurricane Sandy relief bill.
I was disgusted.
I mean, where does that even fall?
Where does that play into anything that happened yesterday?
Well, those Republicans, by the way, and of course, I wouldn't expect the these these Twitter bobs to, even if they did know what I'm gonna tell you, they wouldn't include it because they're trying to advance a fraudulent uh concept.
Of course.
But the Republicans that voted against the aid that the aid package was part of a huge budget busting bunch of pork.
Right.
That went way beyond disaster relief.
And that's why I tweeted back to him.
They were not they were not opposed to assisting the idea that what these people on Twitter try to convey is that Republicans don't care about people who are suffering, and just as soon let them die.
And just as soon let them not get their houses rebuilt.
When in fact, the bottom line is that you go we've got a Democrat governor, we got a Republican governor trying to make everybody think he's a Democrat in New Jersey, we got a Democrat president, and we still have people In dire straits where that hurricane hit, all these so-called people of great compassion with their hands on the purse strings, and there still hasn't been a whole lot of the relief aid that's come forth.
Nothing to do with the Republicans.
Now, on an interesting note to this, Tom Colburn, Republican senator from Oklahoma.
When the whole idea of disaster relief for Oklahoma hit just yesterday, Tom Colemard said, fine and dandy, but there better be some appropriate spending cut somewhere in the budget.
I don't want this disaster relief to be a budget buster.
So in his own state, you know, let these Twitter bobs get hold of this.
Tom Colburn in his own state said, fine, I'm all for disaster relief, but I'm not gonna authorize it or vote for it unless there's corresponding budget cuts or spending cuts somewhere else so that it's not anything but but but revenue neutral.
Now imagine that.
Right.
Well, that's the the Democrat uh translation of that is that he doesn't care what happened to the people in his state.
All he cares about is, you know, making sure that um, you know, uh relief is appropriated, uh you know, it's whatever the the reason they don't understand what the under, you know, he does care.
He's just trying to be realistic.
This this Hurricane Sandy relief bill was ridiculously full of torque.
But here's the And that's they had every right to vote against the R. Right, but here's the thing, just in a in a you know, low information world, the the people for whom all that's intended believe it.
The Atlantic Monthly has a headline.
Why we can't forget that Oklahoma's senators voted against sanity relief.
It was a slush fund.
It took money from relief and funneled it to Democrat loyalists.
And they called it a relief fund, and it wasn't.
It was a slush fund.
And that's why the Republicans voted against it.
But low information voters are not going to get that news.
Okay, folks, I have done found that story that I've been done looking for.
Oh, before I I get to that, I got I got an email note from a friend.
Rush is any part of you enjoying the inquisition the Apple execs are going through today.
You mentioned all of these welfare check cashing bloggers who are out there blindly supporting Obama on everything he's doing, and then he doesn't live up to his promises and they can't believe it.
What about the high information voters like these Apple execs from a liberal thinking company?
They're probably all a bunch of libs, and here they are under attack from the president they supported.
And by the way, folks, don't think that this Senate stuff isn't happening without Obama's knowledge.
Again, Apple is to be made an example of here.
They're too big, they're too successful, and they didn't use government to get there.
He ran against business and rich people.
He ran against these kind of guys not paying their fair share.
He ran against these guys.
Now I know he went out there and he had dinner with Steve Jobs and Zuckerberg and all that, but Jobs told him, you know, you're not gonna get re-elected if you don't change the way you're doing.
You're gonna the education system in this country is a mess.
Jobs, jobs told Obama what for.
Now, Jobs was wrong about Obama getting re-elected.
But these the most of Apple, I don't really know.
I'm just assuming, because of efforts that we've made, get in touch with them.
I'm just assuming that that most of the people out at Apple are politically liberal.
And so the question I'm getting is so how do you how Rush, how do you feel?
These guys are under their Inquisition, and they're the the the president they supported and the Democrats they vote for are giving them hell today and attacking them and just trying to destroy their company, destroy their their image.
Isn't it don't you just have a little Shaden Freud Rush?
Aren't you just a little pleased to see I said no?
I am totally frustrated.
This kind of thing totally frustrates me that otherwise intelligence people could be this kind of wrong.
And I'm wondering how these Apple execs feel.
There's one guy in that Senate committee that's defending them.
And to the left, this guy is a racist, extremist, loony-tune, wacko Tea Party kook by the name of Rand Paul.
The only senator in this committee defending Apple, the only senator in this committee defending low taxes, the only I'll give you an example.
Rand Paul was talking to one of these Harvard or Princeton professors that the Senate brought in to agree with them that Apple's a bunch of cheats.
Nobody's accusing Apple of breaking the law, by the way.
What they're accusing Apple of is bad citizenship.
They're saying Apple should be paying more.
Apple saying we're paying exactly what we owe.
Well, you're you got shell companies, you've got holding companies in Ireland.
What do you mean?
And Rand Paul asked this guy, this this Harvard, let me ask you a question on your taxes.
Yes, sir.
Yes, Senator.
Do you minimize your tax burden as much as you can?
Yes, Senator, I do.
Oh, you mean you are not trying to pay as much as you can?
No, Senator, I'm not.
Do you try to find every legal tax deduction you can and take it, sir?
Yes, Senator, I do.
So it's safe to say that you are trying to minimize your tax burden.
Is that right?
Yes, Senator.
Well, then what the hell is your beef here?
That's all Apple's doing.
Taxes are a cost.
They're doing everything they can to keep their costs down.
What Apple's being accused of here is bad citizenship.
What the Democrats on this Senate committee aided and abetted by Senator McCain, by the way, are trying to say is that Apple can pay more because they have more.
That Apple doesn't need all this money that they're making.
Apple doesn't need all this money that they're hoarding.
Apple doesn't need all this money that they're saving.
The government needs this money, and Apple has it and are capable of paying it, and a definition of good citizenship is paying more taxes than you have to.
And these guys are trying to publicly humiliate Apple, put pressure on their stock price.
Many of us go through this kind of thing, folks, when the left gets in gear trying to do economic damage, and that's what they're trying to do to Apple.
And Apple's defending themselves.
We haven't done any law wrong.
We haven't broken any law.
We've paid every dime of tax that we owe, and we will continue to.
And nobody's accused them of breaking the law.
They're just accusing them of bad citizenship.
But the people accusing them of bad citizenship are the people they support, the people they vote for.
And the guy they think that they wouldn't dare go to a cocktail party with is the one guy defending them.
And to me, it it's frustrating to me.
There's no Shad and Freud.
Now here's that story I've done been looking for.
Veronique De Ruby, De Rugi, and I have no idea if I'm pronouncing her name right.
I'm pretty sure I'm right on Veronique.
But then it's little D E, then Capital R-U-GY could be De Rouget, could be De Rougy, could be De Roggy, De Rogie, De Roger.
I'm pronouncing it Veronique de Rugi.
And she posted a little bit at National Review Online in the corner about a Wall Street Journal journal article that talks about the law of unintended consequences.
The short version is employers are flocking the lower cost, bare bones medical plans to avoid the increased cost and mandates of Obamacare.
And the point of the Wall Street Journal story is they've gone out and they've found all of these bureaucrats that helped to write the law who can't believe this is happening.
They can't believe that these businesses are laying people off and converting people from full-time to part-time, and furthermore, are buying bare bones medical plans.
They thought benefits advisors, insurance brokers, these bureaucrats, they thought That Obamacare would broadly enrich benefits, that Obamacare would expand coverage, expand treatment options.
And they just can't believe that this has happened.
That's the point of the Wall Street Journal story.
I knew I had it here in the stacks that were.
Uh Wall Street Journal asked some of the key planners of Obamacare, and they seem mystified that this would happen.
Robert Coker, a former White House health advisor who helped Shepherd the Law said in the Wall Street Journal story, we would not have anticipated that there'd be demand for these types of band-aid plans in 2014.
Our expectation was that uh employers would offer high quality insurance.
So here's one guy, and there's a bunch of them quoted.
Robert Coker.
A former White House health advisor who helped shepherd the law through Congress is literally stunned that businesses are laying people off, converting full to part-time, and buying the cheapest medical plans they can.
They thought the opposite would happen.
And they're literally genuinely surprised.
Now that's something I take Shaden Freud in folks.
That yes, sir rebub.
All right, who's next?
Uh Andy in Asheville, North Carolina.
Wonderful to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
I've been there.
It's a wonderful place.
I've I've been there.
I t I toured the Vanderbilt Mansion there.
Yes, wonderful place.
Um I was actually calling because I find it amazing that it's not a big thing.
Well, it's a little small, but but still I I just still wanted to see it.
I'm sorry, what were you what were we saying?
I'm I'm calling because I find it amazing that it's not more in the news.
Let me say that I'm I'm thirty-three years old.
I just have a month my first kid's a month old right now, and I work at two national food n national restaurants, and it's actually policy in both of them right now to keep us below full time so that they don't have to provide you know the health care and everything just and everything.
And so it's you know, I I'll admit, you know, I've I spent my twenties partying and I I I'll f be the first to say I don't deserve a handout, I don't want a handout.
But now I'm trying to get my life in order, trying to get full time jobs and everything, and they just aren't out there.
And I find it amazing that it's not getting more coverage that and like my wife's mom is a liberal to the death and still thinks that Obamacare is so great for everyone and there are no ill effects, and it's like I can't find full-time work right now because of the companies being afraid that they're gonna have to pay out the medical benefits to everyone.
That's exactly what this Wall Street Journal story I just references about.
Your call could not be more timely.
This Wall Street Journal I was listening to you while I was at one of my jobs, I drive around and I I heard that and I was like, that that's me to a tea.
It's like I I don't understand why it's not getting more coverage.
There are negative effects already happening from the Obamacare thing that no one is talking about.
Let me tell you it is starting to get more coverage.
I mean, having this show up in the Wall Street Journal is not insignificant.
Um and the story that I've read earlier about the union's upset with Obama, that's in the Hill dot com, which is widely read in uh in Washington.
I I think the problems with Obamacare are obvious to everybody.
And I'm t Andy.
Yes.
I I hate to tell you this.
I mean, I I really do.
Part-time is gonna be the new normal because of Obamacare.
And you, by the accident of when you were born, are are running headfirst right into it.
Yeah, it's just amazing that I mean, and then it's you know, it's hard to with a month-year-old child to try to balance two jobs, get the scheduling between the two jobs worked out, so I can almost pull off a full-time work week.
Now you said that you work at two national restaurant chains?
Yes.
So you get two jobs and they're both they've been converted to part-time.
Yes.
And if you add the work together, you've essentially got one full-time job.
Yes.
But you don't have full-time benefits because no benefits at all.
Nun none at all.
Not at all.
Because you've been downsized to part time.
Like how many hours a week in each place do you have?
Uh the one will not let you work more than twenty-eight and the other one is thirty, and that's it.
Like they will cut you in the middle of a shift if you get to that number of hours there.
I know.
In the they just send you home if you get close to the limit.
So uh is it safe, say you're working a fifty-five to fifty-eight hour week?
Yeah.
Two jobs.
Yeah.
And and you've just your wife just had a baby, so at age thirty-three, I heard you say you spent your twenties partying.
I'm assuming what you mean is that you've now, because of the birth of your child, uh you've you've uh you've gotten more serious.
Yes, absolutely.
And then I turn around to look to, you know, try to get full-time work and everything like that, and now it's time, and it's just not possible.
Everywhere I go is like all the the best we can offer you is.
Andy let me I I there's nothing I can specifically do, but I can tell you something.
I've had um over the twenty-five years I've been doing this program.
There have been ups and downs in the U.S. economy over that period.
And it in in one particular time, it was uh an economic downturn that uh had as its primary feature white collar people being laid off, and and the media, by the way, back then, led by USA Today, incidentally, was ecstatic that it was finally management being laid off instead of the blue collar workers that management can find out what it's like.
And so what happened was a lot of these people were forties and fifties and they were being laid off not from jobs but from careers, and they're they weren't gonna be able to go out at their age and replace what they had lost because people younger than they are willing to work for much less.
So these guys, I did a three-day consecutive three-day show on what these people were gonna do, and they called here and they said, you know what?
I'm gonna do what I've always wanted to do, finally.
I've had to work because I've got life responsibilities, family responsibilities, and I've always had a hobby over here I'd like to do that I wish somebody would pay me for.
So out of necessity, for the first time in their lives, many of them found out what they really loved and wanted to do and tried to make a business out of it.
And some of them we kept in touch with them, and some of them succeeded, and they said they'd never been happier.
Now that is still possible for people.
What I want to tell you is, even now in this era of Obamacare, it's it's tougher than it's been for a lot of people, and it's there's nothing you can do about it.
It just happened to be when you were born.
It's the reality you face, but there are still ways that you can overcome it, and you have to realize, Andy, that most of the limitations that you think you face are actually limitations you're putting on yourself and you may not know it.
For example, are you willing to move in order to well that's that's a big hurdle.
Do you know is there something you really would love to do?
Is there a a career job, whatever activity you just love doing and you'd like to get paid for it?
Oh man, I'm already doing that.
I mean, and I love cooking, and that's what I do.
That's that's my passion.
All right.
Well, I'm gonna tell you the opportunity is still there because a lot of people are tuning out and getting depressed and deciding to go ahead and take the welfare check.
There is still a chance you can still overcome this.
I've got to run because I'm way long on time, but you can overcome this because this is still America, and people like you overcoming it are gonna help save this country.
So you can you can beat this, but it isn't gonna be it's gonna be easy.
I wish you the best in it.
Think positive.
My adopted hometown, Sacramento, California, and Jerry, thanks for calling, sir.
It's great to have you here.
Well, thank you.
Good morning or afternoon there, I suppose it is.
Uh I just wanted to say that you know, these current uh scandals going on are merely the bureaucratic bunglings of an affirmative action and incompetent president.
In no way rises to the uh egregiousness of his telling the church what their convictions have to be.
He cannot do that.
He is violating his constitutional oath.
He's playing God.
And I'm my fear is as long as we've got the threat of a president Joe Bite me, we will never get rid of Obama.
Yeah, we're not gonna get rid of Obama anyway.
It's it's is a race.
It just isn't gonna happen.
Not that it needs to.
No matter what, and I mean no matter what, that's not gonna happen.
Uh you've got a blank check with that, especially with the threat of President Biden.
I know.
But you know, you have a good point here.
This attack on the Catholic Church, that is an in-your-face flouting of the Constitution.
Yes, we don't uh run our lives or we don't how do I say this?
We don't change our lives to meet our business.
We change our business to meet our our personal convictions.
And he he wants it the other way around.
He wants our convictions to take second base as opposed to our convictions running how we live, how we're not.
No, he wants he wants you to uh change your loyalties to him and government and give up this Catholic stuff.
You that's loser.
You need to be investing in him and uh and and government.
They can tell you how to better live your life than the church can.
Church is a bunch of restrictive moralists, not gonna let you have any fun and that kind of stuff.
Constitution's full of it.
These guys that wrote it, a bunch of racists themselves, so you'd be wise just to forget those beliefs and channel it somewhere else.
That's what he's trying to do.
Okay, folks, a uh a brief respite here at the top of the busy broadcast hour, and we will be back and resume.
Pick up somewhere, you know, right where we left off or with something new.
I don't know.
▲
Export Selection