All Episodes
Previous Next
April 15, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:23
April 15, 2013, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back to the program, ladies and gentlemen.
It's Douglas Urbansky filling in for Rush Limbaugh.
As I mentioned an hour ago, to those of you who would still like to donate money to Russia's wonderful cause, the leukemia and lymphoma society, the Curathon.
The phone number for that is 1877-3798.
And you don't have to give a lot.
But apparently many of you still want to do it.
And if you go to Rush Limbaugh.com, all of the information is there for you to see.
Now, before we went to the I was mentioning that Bill Maher has made this threat to leave California due to high taxes.
Ladies and gentlemen, here in the state of California, between our federal and state taxes, you can fall into a bracket that is over fifty percent.
So Bill Maher, who you know, Bill Maher, like Rosie O'Donnell, a walking, living, breathing argument to the an attestation to the fact that looks can get you any place.
Bill Maher is on a panel with uh Rachel Maddow, and she was blasting Paul Ryan's proposal as beneficial to the rich during this during this panel.
Anyway, she's she's out there saying, and she says, well, the Ryan budget is a document that says the big problems in America right now are that the rich people don't have enough money.
Which, of course, nonsense.
This is this woman is no intellectual she is she is a by definition a low information news broadcaster.
Um answers.
Bill Maher says, you know what?
He says, you know what, rich people, this is Bill Maher.
Rich people actually do pay the freight in this country.
And then he goes into the statistics that California millionaires pay nearly 40% to the federal government and another 15% here to the state.
And he goes on to say, he says, I just want to say, liberals, you could actually lose me.
It's outrageous what we're paying, over 50%.
I'm willing to pay my share, but yeah, this is ridiculous.
And now, Bill, Bill, what do you think you have been proselytizing for your entire career?
You've been promoting the very people who push for higher taxes.
These taxes are not some little nuance, some little bug in the political philosophy you've been pushing.
They are they are a central feature of it.
Or they are amongst the core features of it.
It is literally difficult for my brain to comprehend someone who can be so ignorant as to not understand this.
And by the way, these taxes, which seem to have caught Bill Maher's attention, Bill, Bill, if you're hearing me, these are only the tip of the most enormous iceberg.
An iceberg bill that you and your ilk have been driving us to at full speed.
Does your side ever give any consideration to all the ramifications and a $17 trillion dollar debt?
Or open-ended money printing.
I mean, Bill, it's great for you to complain about it.
But Mr. Maher, there's no doubt you voted for President Obama.
You gave him money, I think, a lot of money.
A million million dollars.
There's no doubt you voted for Governor Brown, so quit crying.
You know these guys' agenda is taxes, redistributive wealth.
You've even encouraged it in your own way from time to time.
You know, in Urbansky's fantasy laws, we would pass the law that any rich liberal would be banned from moving to a red state.
So just to save on taxes.
Look, California's in a disastrous state.
We have an exodus of jobs and talent.
Let us remember that so goes a California, so can go the United States of America.
Ladies and gentlemen, California was at one point the seventh largest economy in the world, and it's been destroyed by progressives, By the Democrats.
In less than one decade, they have ruined something that was once fine, beautiful, admired.
You just wonder what the people who founded California, the tough people who founded California would think of this.
And what do we have now?
Now we have California is the specter that awaits the rest of the country.
If Obama and his friends continue, in every socialist state that has ever existed, there is nothing but economic devastation.
Read some history, ladies and gentlemen.
And not everyone who lives in California, don't get me wrong, not everyone who lives here is a liberal.
There are plenty of us other folks, but still too few to matter.
Of course, Bill Maher supported Obama.
He makes a living ridiculing those who like me who oppose confiscatory tax policies.
So, Mr. Maher, Bill Maher, you've made your bed.
You've got to lie in it, along with the rest of the liberals who keep voting in these policies.
You don't like it, you're outraged when they tax you.
Or, or ladies and gentlemen, is Bill Mahr having some sort of epiphany?
Class warfare, tax indenturement, entitlement dependency.
Is he having an epiphany?
Is it subtly different when it affects the social celebrity elite?
Mr. Maher, what about Obama's so-called fair share?
The governor of California likes discussing that.
The legislator here likes that.
Fair share.
What is the fair share?
Or are you asking, maybe Bill Maher would like an exemption from taxes in California?
Well, it's happened.
Nancy Pelosi, I think, has had some of her favorite restaurants who have been, she's asked to have them exempt from Obamacare.
Bill, here's the bottom line.
Liberalism isn't working out for you.
It doesn't work out for anybody.
It never does work out.
Gerard Despardue left, he left France because of their taxation policies.
He went to Russia, where they've got much more favorable tax system.
Now, there are many many people out there saying, Bill, don't leave California.
There may be many states that say we don't want you.
But at the end of the day, Bill, what we've had is the fact that the chickens have come home to roost for you.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, the story caught my attention that the IRS, it's tax day, so we'll talk about some tax things.
The IRS can now read your emails without a warrant, without a warrant.
They claim that agents do not need warrants to read emails, text messages, and other private communications.
This is according to internal agency documents that have been released.
Now, just ask yourself for a second, what would happen if you hacked into one of the IRS computers and read their emails?
See how long, see how long that gets you.
Ladies and gentlemen, on tax day, I start to have ideas.
Because I think I listen to the Rush Limbaugh show and I think about the low information voters, and I've said this to you before I said it to you at Christmas time when I was here.
The low we're going to have to eventually think of a way of dealing with the low information voter in this country.
Because you can't really speak fully over the heads of the media as the deck is entirely stacked a certain direction.
And I look at the United States tax code, whether it's 66,000 pages long, 75,000 pages long, it's huge.
And Obama's out there talking about closing loopholes.
Ladies and gentlemen, the United States tax code, if it's more than one page long, is nothing other than loopholes, and loopholes are not a bad word.
Loopholes are a pandering to a special interest group to a lobbyist group for tax exemptions.
So income is exempt.
I tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I tell you, The night before taxes are due, I start thinking about the need to maybe one day we talk about abolishing the IRS, maybe one day we start talking about simplifying the tax code so it can be read on one page.
Because right now you pay to be tormented.
And if Obamacare stands, well, they're going to use that to police you as well.
They're going to use that to police you.
But what happens?
If you decide that if it goes the direction of this country that they're going to need all sorts of mental checks for you to own a gun.
And what happens if you've been someone who wants tax reform and or you don't believe in the collective?
Will there be a government agent qualified to say you're not medically sound enough, psych psychologically sound enough to own a gun?
Because you don't believe in this kind of taxation?
Because you don't believe in the collective?
You think that's crazy?
Governments have been using for years the idea of mental, psychological soundness to punish people.
There's nothing, there's nothing that's not that far-fetched.
We have strange theories of taxation in this country.
Yeah, there's there's there's a new tax that's currently being promoted called the financial transaction tax.
Have you heard of this one?
And this is an idea that Katrina Vanden Hoovel, who's a left-wing writer, she thinks is a great idea.
Tom Harkin and a few others unveiled a bill, and this bill would place what they call a light tax, a light tax on all financial transactions.
Three pennies of every one hundred dollars traded.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, everything you do is taxed as we stand.
You're taxed when you earn your money, you're taxed when you spend your money.
You're taxed when you give your money away.
Get taxed when you do you're taxed when you don't even realize you're being taxed.
There are hidden embedded taxes into the cost of everything you buy.
Which of course pay corporation taxes because they're passed on to the customer.
Obamacare loaded with new taxes.
There's not a tax the left has ever seen that they didn't like.
So having the discussion about taxation.
If you do it in the tall grass, you do it in the details, the low information voter will never follow you.
That's why I start thinking in the nighttime that maybe the tax code should be very simple, one page long.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's Douglas Urbanski filling in for Rush Limbaugh.
The phone number here is 1-800-282-2882.
I'll be right back.
Doug Rabansky back with you, ladies and gentlemen, filling in for Varsh Limbaugh who will be back here tomorrow.
I was telling you that that the idea, and I want to be very clear about this.
If the United States tax code is 65,000 pages long, 75,000 fifty-five, whatever it is, it is enormous.
And it is 65,000 pages of pandering to special interest groups.
There's no such thing as a bad loophole.
When Obama talks about closing loopholes, he's talking about changing the tax code.
There's nothing illegal about so-called loopholes.
Loopholes are the things politicians gave their friends, actually.
The entire tax code is a pandering to special interest groups.
You know, and there's not a lot of passion out there to change the tax code.
If you've got if you've got a society where fewer than half of all Americans are paying federal income tax, there's not going to be a lot of popular support for repeal.
Now look, all taxes are bad.
Every kind of taxes are bad.
Even if the government started to itemize services, it would be a colossal failure.
The government wages war, and it does that okay when that happens.
The government builds roads, it does that fine when that happens.
Apart from those things, government in general is extremely inefficient.
Under the best case scenario.
Almost every government service, Social Security, Medicare, they are patchwork quilts designed primarily to get politicians elected at some point in time.
And perhaps that point in time was far in The past.
So schemes for raising taxes for these programs only turn into contests.
Rush made the point the other day that perhaps, just perhaps, Obamacare was so confusing, so unmanageable, so impossible to implement.
He's made this point repeatedly, but he made the point the other day that maybe this was all set to drive the public into an outcry, begging for single payer as the answer, as the solution.
Ladies and gentlemen, single payer is not the solution to anything.
It's one of the greatest evils that will ever, ever come into your life.
You think that we don't have death panels now under the current system.
Wait until you get single payer, which will decide everything about your body from birth till natural or unnatural death.
One of the things people don't understand is what they have in England.
I often hear the British health care system cited.
In England, they do not have single payer.
In England, if you want to hire your own private doctor, you're welcome to do it.
And they have very fine doctors there.
They're called in the U.K. Harley Street doctors.
And you can still hire them.
You have a choice.
In Canada, no choice.
In Canada, you hire a doctor privately, you'll be punished.
A doctor performs services for you privately, he'll be punished.
If you're in Canada, you have more choice for your pet when it comes to veterinary care than you do for a human being.
So all of these taxes, ladies and gentlemen, especially in Obamacare, all of these taxes, and the progressives loves to use the progressive loves to use the word wealthy, because when they use that word, it's a word of agitation.
They know that they can create a sort of almost intrinsic hatred among some segments of society towards people who have accumulated wealth.
That's been done as far back as the feudal system.
Although most low information voters have no understanding of any of this anyway.
They'll follow anyone or anything that takes wealth from those who got it.
They'll follow anyone.
Most low information voters think they could never become wealthy anyway.
This is very important.
They think that they could never become well that wealthy anyway.
So why not take it from those who from those who are, from those who have it.
Moreover, the Democrats, the control freaks, the leftists, they believe that all money belongs to the government.
None of it belongs to you.
And they slip.
They say we can't afford this tax cut.
Meaning they're saying they can't afford to give you some money.
That's already you think is yours, they think it's theirs.
All money belongs to the government.
This is how they believe.
We will let you keep the part that is not taxes.
If you keep complaining, we'll come back.
Maybe not that you keep so much next time around.
Now, what makes the situation worse in America is that we don't even really we don't really get a lot back for the huge amount of taxes that those who are productive are paying.
You've got crumbling cities.
You've got roads and highways that are in need of work.
Education system turning out a product that is been brainwashed into leftism to start with.
We have the most pampered public servants, highest paid bureaucrats, the most bloated, the most inefficient, the most wasteful governments on the national, the state, the local levels in the first world.
And at the same time, these governments with their gigantic bureaucracies and their mountains of red tape are stifling innovation, stifling growth of the private sector, allowing lucrative resources to rot in the ground.
Oil, I'm talking about.
Money is continually being printed, which of course lowers the value of money, and it lowers the value of your assets.
Money is just spread around.
Tell you, ladies and gentlemen, the the what they say the power to tax is the power to destroy.
It sure is, it sure is.
The 16th Amendment.
Not a good thing.
It has given the government nearly infinite powers of taxation over the American people.
And the worst part of it is that this has institutionalized the sinful behavior, the corrupt behavior of the very fabric of our governance.
Ladies and gentlemen, progressive taxation is based upon covetous covetness.
Covetousness.
Meaning that you covet the neighbors' goods, the folks who have more.
Therefore tax them because they have more.
Welcome back to the show, ladies and gentlemen.
It's Doug Rebansky here filling in for Rush Limbaugh, who will be back here tomorrow.
Let's go to the call, shall we?
Tom in Ridgewood, New Jersey, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh Show.
How are you today, Tom?
I'm good.
Uh Doug, thanks for filling in for Rush.
I always I always enjoy listening to your commentary.
Um I'm a first time caller and I'm a little nervous, so I'll get right to the point.
Um what can I do, Tom?
What can I do, Tom, to make you more nervous?
Good question.
Anyway, getting back to your uh the point uh uh uh the North Korea issue.
Uh I really want to thank you for being willing to speak candidly about the obvious reality that China is North Korea's puppet master.
Um now you mentioned Reagan and I often listen to some of Reagan's radio broadcasts, which have been compiled in the collection called Reagan and his own voice, I'm sure you've heard of it.
Uh and uh in one of the broadcasts he speaks about China's deviousness and uh I think the name of the broadcast is uh commencement address uh uh uh commencement address in China.
Um anyway, like so many of uh of his other radio commentaries during the mid seventies, uh Reagan was he was almost prophetic in his warnings about China.
And in this particular broadcast, he warns that we should be wary of the Chinese communists who speak kind words in public while they plot behind the scenes to undermine American interests.
And um And is he making reference to some to a speech that was given in China?
He was, yeah.
It was uh it was uh uh a communist official.
Oh, wait, can I guess the name of the official?
Sure, go ahead.
Was it Joe Biden?
Yes, it was.
Go on.
It might as well have been.
But uh I I forget the guy's name, I honestly couldn't pronounce it.
Uh but it was a commencement address at a graduating class of uh College of Foreign Affairs.
And um anyway, in this address, this Chinese official says, uh, and I quote, for all its vaunted power, the United States has a soft weak side which we can use to our advantage.
And then he also goes on to speak of uh uh uh what's called a policy of duality where the ChaiComs uh could develop a friendly relationship with the United States while simultaneously undermining us.
Yeah, and this is of course this picks up what Khrushchev had said earlier, decades earlier.
Right.
And um I'm gonna lose every low information voter if they've not already lost them already by saying this.
If you've not read a book, Tom called The Unknown Mao, I've mentioned it before on the air.
I urge everyone to read it, because um it's a very brutal regime in China.
Then not our friends.
And finding don't you find it appalling that John Kerry has gone to China on his knees and said, Hey, if you control this guy in North Korea, um we'll get rid of some of our m some defenses in the air.
Well, and that's what's so frustrating is that that plays exactly into the hands of the Chinese.
This is exactly what they want.
Well, not by accident.
They this is what they've orchestrated, and we just go along.
I know, I know.
And it drives me crazy to see it happening and to see that Reagan was speaking about it back in the late 70s, and yet we're still clueless.
It really is frustrating.
Yeah, we we need the next generation of the kill.
Well, you heard me mention the Nixon Kissinger doctrine, and that's where that's where the worst decision history has ever made.
I thank you so much.
Is that it, Tom?
Do you have anything else you want to add?
Well, I I was gonna say, you know, uh there is another book, not you mentioned that one.
There's another one called Red Dragon Rising, which I recommend.
Yep.
Uh well there we there you go.
They're the last of the low information voters have just left the building.
Tom, thanks so much for calling me on the Rush Limbaugh show.
I I Appreciate it more than I can more than I can tell you, honestly.
Thank you so much for calling.
I also wanted to speak to Tom in the suburbs of Chicago.
It's not often that I take a call back to back, but he's got something that touches on what I was saying earlier.
Hello, Tom, welcome to the Rush Lombaugh Show.
Good afternoon.
How are you doing?
I'm good.
How are you, sir?
Just great.
Back in 1966, I went to what they called an anti-Cimmunist training meeting.
And the people out there told us the United States was too powerful and it will never be taken from without.
It will only be taken from within and people you're seeing it done just as this man predicted it would be done.
Um we have a slump here in the Midwest that we've been going through since uh, say two thousand eight, two thousand nine.
It it's been rocky, it's been rolled.
It's the worst economy we've ever had in my industry here.
And most of my customers are experiencing the same thing, some who vote.
What is your industry on broadly speaking by a thread?
Um and now we've got Kerry over there, uh you know, trying to uh placate, if you will, a little dictator who, if he would just sit aside and wait, uh the United States is being systematically torn down without his help, but I think he just wants to make the final thrust so that he can take the credit for it.
Um Having said all that, um I have to f wind up with is we're talking about Barack and his fair, fair, fair, fair.
Uh he pays eighteen percent, and he makes uh a real nice dollar.
I make less than a hundred thousand, I'm paying twenty-seven percent.
But I guess what I'm going to do is take whatever meager funds I have and invest him in John Kerry knee pads because right now he is doing us no good whatsoever.
Not at all.
He's Tom, broadly speaking, Tom, what is your industry?
Uh we're in the machining trades.
Mm-hmm.
There's a Obama saying for to secure peace, prepare for war.
The Obamas are paying roughly eighteen percent.
I've seen the story, I've got it someplace here from the Wall Street Journal, their tax return shows lower earnings.
The Obama's family income um was um let's see what it was.
It was six hundred and eight thousand dollars, and they paid eighteen point four percent in taxes uh this year.
They give some money to charity in the process and yet they're living would you say, Tom, that the Obamas are living in the lifestyle of the one percenters?
Oh my god, they're in the stratosphere right now.
Wouldn't you say if I revised that number that they're living in the point zero zero zero zero zero one percent?
That's about where he's at right now with the kind of taxes he pays and for the benefits he gets besides the regular.
Exactly so.
Exactly so.
Well, Tom, is that it?
Thank you very much for calling the Limbo Show.
Is that it, Tom?
Yes.
Very grateful for you call.
Couldn't agree more, Tom.
Very good callers.
Have you seen this one?
There's a film out there, ladies and gentlemen, about Jackie Robinson.
And I've not yet seen it.
I'm told it's uh what's that, sir?
Uh yes.
Have you seen this film?
Have you heard about it?
Um the film I'm I hear it's very good.
And um I just did a film with Harrison Ford last year, so we we've spoken about it.
He's very proud of his work playing Branch Ricky.
Um Mrs. Obama had a screening at the White House, Mr. Ms. Obama had a screening, and she uh said that she and the president felt raw emotion from watching the racial abuse that Jackie Robinson and his wife endured.
Um she said the film is a reminder of how far we have to go and how much work we have to do.
Ladies and gentlemen, I go back to Jim Carrey during the past couple of weeks making fun of Chuck Heston, who was my neighbor and I also knew.
Chuck Heston risked life and limb to go march in Selma.
Is anyone aware of that?
He did it, and he was one of the biggest movie stars in the world.
Meantime, the Jim Carrey and others ridicule this man because of his interest in protecting the Second Amendment rights.
Now, this movie about Jackie Robinson, where Mrs. Obama says we've got so far to go, it made her mad.
Is the Jackie Robinson story remotely like the movie of Michelle Obama's life or Barack Obama's life?
If you were making a movie about either of them, would it be anything like the Jackie Robinson story?
Mrs. Obama's been mad a long time.
I would I I put it to you That there are lessons to be learned from Robinson's dignity, from his courage.
The type of thing he faced.
What he did.
Um it's not necessarily what Barack and Michelle Obama ever faced.
By the way, if she's mad at the movie, wait till she finds out that Jackie Robinson was in fact a Republican.
Or if she was mad, wait until she actually figures out that Jackie Robinson was recruited based upon his merit.
Not his skin color.
She's upset that he was taunted, which of course is terrible.
But where are the Obamas on the subject of the Christians and the Coptic Christians in Egypt and across Africa?
Who are being taunted and worse?
They're being burned alive in their schools and their churches.
I mean, Robinson is a historical figure.
He is the first African American to play in the majors.
And he did break the color barrier, but he didn't break it alone.
He broke it with Branch Ricky.
Did she mention that?
She did not mention that.
She did not mention that.
Did you does she get mad if Reverend Wright made racial slurs against people?
I don't think so.
I don't think so.
So the movie I'm told is very good.
I'm told it's a very, very good film.
Would she get mad if it was a film about Dr. Carson?
I mean, one of the things people forget in the Robinson story, yes, it was him.
He had to deal with hate, he had to deal with racism.
He I'm sure it was very bad because of his position of fame, worse than many people.
But was he kicking indoors?
Was he walking around the field demanding the play?
He was not.
He had great dignity.
Great, great, great dignity.
As I said, what what would she say if it was a film about Dr. Ben Carson?
Dr. Carson's film.
Would she say that's the film you should all go see?
I'm running long here, ladies and gentlemen.
Gonna scoot Douglas Orbanski for Rush, we'll be right back.
Welcome back to the show, ladies and gentlemen, Dr. Bansky filling in for Rush Limbaugh.
And the question was really we're talking about this new film 42 about the Jackie Robinson story, which I have not seen, but I hear it's very good.
And uh Michelle Obama was making the point that the film made her mad, and I was making the point that she was generally pretty mad about a lot of stuff with or without having seen the film.
But would the film, if you made it about Dr. Ben Carson's life, would that make her mad?
I think it would make her very mad.
Eddie in St. George, Utah, you've been holding Sir Welcome to the Rush Limbo Show.
How are you today, Eddie?
Super superb, excited to be on and get it finally through to talk to you.
Well, I'm pleased to talk to you too, Eddie.
What's what's on your mind?
Well, I my wife and I went and saw the film 42 just this last weekend, and uh, like the Obamas, absolutely loved it, but my perspective was it shows how far we've come more than it shows how far we have to go.
The the negativity of the attitude of saying I can't there's nothing remotely even similar to what happened to Jackie Robinson that exists today.
Well, can you imagine sitting in the White House and making that observation?
You're sitting in the darn White House.
Well, I I'd love to stand in the White House and make that observation, maybe wake a couple of people up.
I mean I mean the I mean the observation, I mean the observation that we have far to go and how angry she is and how mad it made her.
It's it's an unreal level of pessimism and and negativism that comes out of that white house.
I grew up in the 70s in uh in Kentucky, as I was telling your call screener, and that was the time that the Supreme Court was forcing integration and bussing.
My school housed the buses for the county school district and were bombed, and we had burned barrels up and down the highway, and the Ku Klux Klan rallies were a mile from my house in Louisville, Kentucky, and helicopters overhead, and I got the abuse because I played basketball and was with those fellows.
And I I remember in the sixties, I had to walk down the dirt streets to visit my friend Johnny Paul, but I could go on the paved roads to visit my friend Brad, and I didn't know why until years later I looked at the picture and saw, hey, Johnny Paul was black.
Who knew?
Well I don't have to walk down dirt roads.
I have one of my best golf buddies in white St. George Mormon, Utah is a black fellow.
And he lives in a Nice house.
How far have we come, for pity's sakes?
I guess my question to you is this.
You saw the film, which I have not seen.
Did the film um the film didn't make you angry?
Did it was it a film that showed great dignity of Jackie Robinson and uh Well, like I say, having grown up athletically and and participating with black Americans, I was I was moved by it.
It really was a moving experience, and to me it just showed the hope of what we've been able to accomplish and the the greatness of guys like Brant Ricky that stepped up.
I mean, he in my mind, he's the equivalent of uh um Oh, what's the I just totally lost my thought that you're Branch Ricky in this story.
The interesting thing about this story, and I've not seen the film.
The interesting thing about Brent Rickey is this.
He's motivated by wanting the best and by wanting his team to win.
Absolutely.
There was no affirmative.
He's not motivated by by being a he's not motivated by being a revolutionary, he's not motivated by being by trying to change society.
He's motivated by baseball.
Yes.
And of course, and of course, as you see, it makes you colorblind at that point because he was interested in the game, and of course, he ended up really risking his own life and limb for a moment to step over that barrier and to say this is the best guy.
It's a wonderful time in history.
And there's an ex there's an extremely poignant point in the film where there's a little kid in the stands with his dad, and the dad starts yelling the racist racist taunts, and he looks up at his dad and begins to copy him, and then his hero, Pee Wee Reese, comes over and puts his arm around Jackie Robinson and stands there in front of the Louisville,
Kentucky hometown fans, and the little boy's hero has his arm around Jackie Robinson, and the boy looks up at his dad, and his face changes, and you can see the attitude change, and that's happened across the country, and we've made huge strides in progress.
So that like I say, that level of negative attitude from the White House is really killing any progress we've made.
Well, Eddie, throw this irony into it.
This attitude, the continual racial division attitude from the White House, from people who sat listening to Reverend Wright for many years.
Just uh just pointing out the irony.
Anyway, Eddie, thanks so much for calling the Rush Limbaugh Show.
Very delighted that you're there with us.
Um let's go see the film this week, and I say to my wife, let's let's go see it.
Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, it's Dugger Basky filling in for Rush Limbaugh.
We're gonna take a short break.
We'll be right back.
Welcome back to the show, ladies and gentlemen, Duggar Bansky filling in for Rush Limbo.
I'm seeing come on Drudge as we're speaking to you, that um the madness of King Bloomberg continues.
He says, if you sell a gun to your son, there is something wrong with your family.
Uh I I think there's something wrong with with with Nanny Bloomberg.
He said in this famous interview recently on NBC, he said there, I he said, I think there are certain times when we should infringe on your freedom.
Me we, of course, means him, the government, you were means you.
This guy's obsessed with the freedom to own guns.
He's obsessed with your freedom in New York City to feed your child formula rather than breast milk.
His his whole life is government knows best, no matter what.
The banning of the drinks, the removing of salt from the from the tables, and all the rest.
Meantime, Mayor Bloomberg, who's a billionaire, you know this.
Maybe you don't know this.
The New York Times had the story.
He shares his time between New York City and Bermuda.
Do you know that that most of the time this guy is from they don't make appointments for him from Friday morning till till Monday?
He's out of there.
He goes to Bermuda where he lives.
He lives in Bermuda.
He's got a waterfront estate, and they have a sort of wall between all the reportage of his life in Bermuda and the voters in New York.
They say it's none of their business.
He refuses to say when he's on the island.
They they have gone through the trouble of blocking aviation websites from making public the movements of the private planes of Mayor Bloomberg.
Are you aware of this?
The guy who campaigns against guns takes armed New York City police officers with him to Bermuda.
He's gotten special special permission from the government of Bermuda to have these people there with him.
And he apparently plays golf once, twice a day.
They say he's obsessed with it.
He's got five balcony is living this lavish lifestyle.
Nanny Bloomberg, you can't have a large drink.
You mustn't own a gun.
Don't give your child formula, no salt on the tables.
▲
Export Selection